Text

Proposed RO Admin JPMs
	ML19248C636
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	08/09/2019
From:	Joseph Demarshall; Detroit Edison, Co
To:	; NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
	Demarshall J
Shared Package
ML17215A391	List: ML19248C281; ML19248C288; ML19248C625; ML19248C636; ML19248C637; ML19248C660; ML19248C664;
References
	Download: ML19248C636 (41)
	v • d • e

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 Job Position SRO / RO No.

JP-OP-802-4101-431 Revision 2

JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT)

Duration 15 minutes*

Page 1

2 times Duration for ILO Exams Examinee:

SRO / RO Evaluator:

Validating Representatives Name: Ken Griffin / Phil Heuker JPM Type:

Normal / Alternate Path / Time Critical Start Time Evaluation Method:

Perform / Walkthrough / Discuss Stop Time Location:

Plant / Simulator / Classroom Total Time:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SUMMARY

Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

SRO Only OPERATOR FUNDAMENTALS OBSERVATION Monitor operator fundamentals during the JPM set. Rate each area based on the criteria by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column. Indicate the comment number associated with the observation.

Operator Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Comment Number Monitoring Control Conservatism Teamwork Knowledge OVERALL EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

REMEDIAL CONTENT:

______ PASS

______ FAIL Evaluator Signature / Date:

/

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT)

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-431 Revision: 2 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 JPM Observation Criteria Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Monitoring Equipment status monitored at proper frequency, using multiple means if available.

Understood which indications were critical.

Some monitoring was performed but undue focus on task or lack of system knowledge prevented ideal monitoring.

Did not recognize key equipment status indicators, too much focus on single indications and ignored total system status.

Control Task preview used to prepare for job. Aware of control bands and maintained them.

Configuration control maintained.

Adequate control of system maintained throughout task but some improvements could be made such as better manual control or greater depth of knowledge for anticipating system response.

No anticipation of results of actions. Unaware or control bands or not able to maintain them. Lack of knowledge of how to control system parameters.

Conservatism Low threshold for identification of problems.

Questioning attitude. Uses stop when unsure if needed. Sensitive to nuclear safety.

Some opportunities existed to question before proceeding, High focus on task completion without consideration for other system affects.

Proceeds even when unsure with unanswered questions.

High threshold for problem conditions.

Teamwork Routinely communicates system status changes to the team. Communicates actions before taking them.

Communicated most status and actions. Some improvement would be warranted.

Routinely takes action without informing the team.

Knowledge Able to anticipate system response based on solid system knowledge. Good working knowledge of generic fundamentals to predict and monitor system response.

Plant, system, or generic fundamental knowledge has some gaps.

Unable to predict system response, unsure of generic fundamentals concepts related to plant operation.

Only relied on procedure for operating knowledge.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT)

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-431 Revision: 2 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 JPM Information System:

B1100 & J1100 - Core and Fuel Task:

8068 - Perform core performance parameter check

References:

Required (R) / Available (A) 24.000.02, Shifty, Daily and Weekly Required Surveillances, Attachment 2 (pg 19 of 24) (R)

Tools and Equipment Required:

3DM Edit Printout (attached)

Initial Conditions:

Today is Sunday (previous Sundays date) Dayshift.

You are the Patrol LNO.

The plant is operating steady state at 100% rated thermal power, and has been at 100% power for greater than one week.

Initiating Cue(s):

The CRS directs you to complete Step 16 of 24.000.02, Attachment 2, Core Thermal Limit Verification.

The STA has indicated that 3DM limits are reflective of the status of the MSR and BPVs.

There has been no TAU change.

Terminating Cue(s):

Surveillance is complete, and Tech Spec and limiting time identified (SRO only).

Task Standard:

Perform Core Thermal Limit verification in accordance with 24.000.02 Attachment 2 (Step 16), and identify Tech Spec LCO 3.2.1 not met - one hour time limit (SRO only).

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT)

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-431 Revision: 2 Page 4 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 Licensed Operator Exam Information (required for NRC exams)

Safety Function:

N/A K/A

Reference:

(from NUREG 1123)

K/A SYSTEM: 293009 - Core Thermal Limits K/A STATEMENT: Generic 2.1.7 Ability to evaluate plant performance and make operational judgments based on operating characteristics / reactor behavior / and instrument interpretation..................................... 3.7 / 4.4 2.1.33 Ability to recognize indications for system operating parameters which are entry-level conditions for technical specifications............................................................................... 3.4 / 4.0 Maintenance Rule Safety Classification:

N/A Maintenance Rule Risk Significant? (Yes or No)

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT)

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-431 Revision: 2 Page 5 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Start Time ELEMENT STANDARD CUE:

Provide examinee with Cue Sheet.

Provide examinee copy of 24.000.02 Att. 2, and the 3D Monicore Edit (attached). Inform the examinee this is the latest 3DM Edit.

1.

Verify LPRMs are not failed (except for Bypassed LPRMs) and no other sensors are failed which affect the Heat Balance

1.

Verifies there are no failed LPRMs or other sensors shown on the 3DM edit.

2.

Verify Flow basis is MEAS.

2.

Verifies Flow basis is MEAS.

3.

If failed sensors exist (other than Bypassed or PANACEA-rejected LPRMs) or the flow basis is not MEAS, consult with the STA/SNE for appropriate action before continuing.

3.

Identifies no failed sensors exist on the 3DM edit.

4.

Place a check in items a and b when the review is satisfactory or when discrepancies are resolved and logged by the STA/SNE.

4.

Checks blocks a and b. The review is satisfactory.

5.

Record Calculated Date and Time (items c and d) of the Core Monitor Periodic Log and verify complete in last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

5.

Records Date and Time and verifies complete within the last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months CUE:

As CRS acknowledge report of Tech Spec.

6.

Record the listed parameters (items e - h) as they appear on the Core Monitor Periodic Log.

6.

Records CTP and Thermal Limit values.

Identifies that MAPRAT is 1.008. Notifies CRS that TS is not met.

NOTE: Examinee may state that this non-compliance should be noted in the Comments Section

7.

Step signature

7.

Does NOT initial or sign since Acceptance Criteria is NOT met.

8.

Review Tech Specs (SRO Only)

8.

Identifies TS 3.2.1 APLHGR Condition A.1, Restore within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months (SRO Only).

CUE:

End JPM when surveillance is complete, and Tech Spec and limiting time identified (SRO only).

______ SATISFACTORY

______ UNSATISFACTORY Stop Time

Critical Step

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT)

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-431 Revision: 2 Page 6 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 Evaluator Notes:

ENSURE ALL INDUSTRIAL AND PERSONNEL SAFETY PRACTICES ARE USED AND ENFORCED AT ALL TIMES.

Generic Notes and Cues:

None System Specific Notes and Cues:

None Task Performance and Cues:

The Elements of this JPM are step by step in accordance with the procedure. The Standard is that the procedure is performed as written. The Cues are as listed above for indication or as each step is completed the appropriate information is reported to the examinee.

Critical Steps:

Critical Tasks are identified by asterisk (*) and bolded steps on the cover sheet. Verify that the latest revision of the procedure is used and critical tasks are correctly identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT)

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-431 Revision: 2 Page 7 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS Reason for follow-up question(s):

Question:

Reference:

Response

Question:

Reference

Response

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT)

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-431 Revision: 2 Page 8 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 Simulator Setup IC#:

N/A Malfunctions:

Number Title Value Delay Ramp N/A Remote Functions:

Number Title Value Delay Ramp N/A Override Functions:

Number Title Value Delay Ramp N/A Special Instructions:

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 Cue Sheet: (JP-OP-802-4101-431)

Initial Conditions:

Today is Sunday (previous Sundays date) Dayshift.

You are the Patrol LNO.

The plant is operating steady state at 100% rated thermal power, and has been at 100% power for greater than one week.

Initiating Cue(s):

The CRS directs you to complete Step 16 of 24.000.02, Att. 2, Core Thermal Limit Verification.

The STA has indicated that 3DM limits are reflective of the status of the MSR and BPVs.

There has been no TAU change.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE PAGE 1 FERMI CYCLE 20 SEQUENCE NO 11 CORE PARAMETERS 3DM/P11 Today 08:00 CALCULATED POWER MWT 3430 PERIODIC LOG Today 08:01 PRINTED POWER MWE 1134.

AUTOMATIC CASE ID FMLD1050609105759 FLOW MLB/HR 92.266 CALC RESULTS RESTART FMLD1050609095759 FPADPR 0.905 LPRM SHAPE - FULL CORE SUBC BTU/LB 21.97 Keff 1.0026 PR PSIa 1040.78 XE WORTH % -2.33 LOAD LINE

SUMMARY

CORE MWD/sT 23998.7 XE/RATED 1.02 CORE POWER 100.0%

CYCLE MWD/sT 3997.3 AVE VF 0.469 CORE FLOW 92.3%

MCPR 1.628 LOAD LINE 104.9%

CORRECTION FACTOR: MFLCPR= 1.000 MFLPD= 1.000 MAPRAT= 1.000 OPTIONS: ARTS 2 LOOPS ON MANUAL FLOW MCPRLIM= 1.350 MOST LIMITING LOCATIONS (NON-SYMMETRIC)

MFLCPR LOC MFLPD LOC MAPRAT LOC PCRAT LOC 0.829 29-10 0.985 51 4 1.008 51 4 1.011 9 5 0.826 9-30 0.975 33 5 0.975 33 5 1.006 9 5 0.814 29-14 0.955 51 4 0.925 51 5 1.006 13 5 0.812 13-30 0.867 51 5 0.900 41 5 1.006 11 5 0.805 27-12 0.862 53 5 0.747 51 4 1.005 7 5 0.803 11-28 0.861 41 5 0.747 37 5 1.005 27 3 0.796 27-10 0.861 31 5 0.743 51 5 1.004 7 5 0.790 9-28 0.854 53 4 0.742 53 5 1.004 13 4 0.786 25-10 0.854 37 5 0.734 31-8- 5 1.003 19-5- 4 0.785 9-26 0.849 51 5 0.727 47 5 1.003 23 4 SEQ. A002 C=MFLCPR D=MFLPD M=MAPRAT P=PCRAT *=MULTIPLE CORE AVE AXIAL NOTCH REL PW LOC 0.110 25 00 0.244 24 02 0.582 23 L

04 0.780 22 55 06 0.835 21 51 08 0.902 20 L

10 0.927 19 47 06 06 12 0.934 18 43 P 14 0.953 17 L

16 1.015 16 39 06 10 06 18 1.049 15 35 20 1.103 14 L

M 22 1.152 13 31 10 10 24 1.190 12 27 26 1.203 11 L

28 1.219 10 23 06 10 06 30 1.269 09 19 32 1.312 08 L

34 1.335 07 15 06 06 36 1.405 06 11 C

38 1.449 05 L

40 1.382 04 07 42 1.280 03 03 44 1.008 02 L L L L L L L 46 0.362 01 02 06 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 CORE AVERAGE RADIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION RING #

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 REL PW 1.123 1.259 1.138 1.202 1.123 1.261 1.087 0.497

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Page 2 FERMI CYCLE 20 INSTRUMENT READINGS/STATUS SEQUENCE NO 11 CALIBRATED LPRM READINGS Today 08:00 CALCULATED Today 08:01 PRINTED 57 D 20.0 26.5 26.3 22.3 CASE ID FMLD1050609105759 C

23.8 32.2 31.1 29.2 LPRM SHAPE - FULL CORE B

26.0 38.8 40.0 35.3 A

23.3 41.5 39.0 37.5 FAILED SENSORS 49 D 20.7 27.9 30.1 30.3 29.7 24.7 LPRM ( 0 SIGNALS FAILED)

C 25.8 40.6 40.7 38.7 39.6 25.8 LPRM ( 0 PANACEA REJECTED)

B 28.9 49.3 49.8 53.9 50.6 43.7 OTHER SENSORS ( 0 TOTAL )

A 27.4P 58.9 56.9 63.8 62.1 52.3 SUB RODS NONE 41 D 26.2 29.7 31.9 34.2 30.2 28.8 22.5 C 35.9 39.5 42.4 40.5 40.2 38.7 30.2 B 46.8 48.9 53.2 52.8 53.2 50.5 36.6 A 64.8 55.0 53.7 52.7 60.6 63.4 39.4 T = T I P RUN RECOMMENDED 33 D 28.1 32.0 35.9 34.5 35.5 31.4M 25.3 C = MFLCPR LOCATION C 40.2 42.8 41.1 42.5 41.8 43.3 36.3 M = MAPRAT LOCATION B 50.7 53.7 50.4 50.3 53.4 55.0 43.2 D = MFLPD LOCATION A 69.7 56.9 50.7 58.9 53.7 43.4 41.0 P = PCRAT LOCATION

= MULTIPLE LIMIT 25 D 28.4 31.7 34.7 35.4 31.3 28.9 25.6 C 39.1 43.0 44.6 40.9 41.5 38.8 32.6 B 51.1 53.1 56.7 52.0 52.9 51.1 39.5 A 66.0 51.2 56.4 50.8 57.7 51.2 44.1 17 D 22.1 30.7 31.8C 32.9 29.4 26.9 19.4 C 31.2 41.7 43.7 44.0 38.4 39.3 23.7 B 40.1 53.4 54.3 54.6 49.4 49.8 26.0 A 51.7 61.6 49.6 54.8 58.5 61.5 24.6 09 D 23.6 28.9 29.5 26.8 21.1 C

39.3 39.6 41.6 38.6 25.5 B

42.4 50.6 51.4 47.6 28.8 A

51.6 64.7 66.3 63.0 28.0 08 16 24 32 40 48 56 CORE

SUMMARY

CORE POWER 100 %

CALC SUB FLOW 94.1% DP MEAS PSI 13.681 CORE FLOW 92.3 %

OPER SUB FLOW 92.3% DP CALC PSI 18.836 LOAD LINE 104.9 %

FLOW BASIS MEAS FEEDWTR FLOW MLB/HR 14.81 APRM CALIBRATION 1

2 3

4 READING 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.9 AGAF 1.001 1.001 1.002 1.001 APRM - %CTP -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 TIP RUNS RECOMMENDED STRINGS : NONE

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Job Position SRO / RO No.

JP-OP-802-4101-191 Revision 0

JPM Title Calculate Secondary Containment Vacuum Duration 15 minutes*

Page 1

2 times Duration for ILO Exams Examinee:

SRO / RO Evaluator:

Validating Representatives Name: Ken Griffin / Phil Heuker JPM Type:

Normal / Alternate Path / Time Critical Start Time Evaluation Method:

Perform / Walkthrough / Discuss Stop Time Location:

Plant / Simulator / Classroom Total Time:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SUMMARY

Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment

1.

2.

3.

4.

5

6 7

OPERATOR FUNDAMENTALS OBSERVATION Monitor operator fundamentals during the JPM set. Rate each area based on the criteria by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column. Indicate the comment number associated with the observation.

Operator Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Comment Number Monitoring Control Conservatism Teamwork Knowledge OVERALL EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

REMEDIAL CONTENT:

______ PASS

______ FAIL Evaluator Signature / Date:

/

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Secondary Containment Vacuum No.: JP-OP-802-4101-191 Revision: 0 Page 1 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Observation Criteria Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Monitoring Equipment status monitored at proper frequency, using multiple means if available.

Understood which indications were critical.

Some monitoring was performed but undue focus on task or lack of system knowledge prevented ideal monitoring.

Did not recognize key equipment status indicators, too much focus on single indications and ignored total system status.

Control Task preview used to prepare for job. Aware of control bands and maintained them.

Configuration control maintained.

Adequate control of system maintained throughout task but some improvements could be made such as better manual control or greater depth of knowledge for anticipating system response.

No anticipation of results of actions. Unaware or control bands or not able to maintain them. Lack of knowledge of how to control system parameters.

Conservatism Low threshold for identification of problems.

Questioning attitude. Uses stop when unsure if needed.

Sensitive to nuclear safety.

Some opportunities existed to question before proceeding, High focus on task completion without consideration for other system affects.

Proceeds even when unsure with unanswered questions.

High threshold for problem conditions.

Teamwork Routinely communicates system status changes to the team. Communicates actions before taking them.

Communicated most status and actions. Some improvement would be warranted.

Routinely takes action without informing the team.

Knowledge Able to anticipate system response based on solid system knowledge. Good working knowledge of generic fundamentals to predict and monitor system response.

Plant, system, or generic fundamental knowledge has some gaps.

Unable to predict system response, unsure of generic fundamentals concepts related to plant operation.

Only relied on procedure for operating knowledge.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Secondary Containment Vacuum No.: JP-OP-802-4101-191 Revision: 0 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Information System:

T5000 - Primary Containment Monitoring System Task:

02A0006027 - Perform Control Room Mode 4 Surveillances

References:

Required (R) / Available (A) 24.000.02, Attachment 4 - Shiftly/Daily - Mode 4 - Control Room Surveillances, Step 10.0 Secondary Containment Vacuum (R) 24.000.02, Attachment 5 - Shiftly/Daily - Mode 4 - Plant, Step 5.0 Secondary Containment Pressure Correction Information - Location of highest reading (Least Negative) Pressure Sensor [T41-N342A(B),

N343A(B), N344A(B), or N345A(B)] on the Refueling Floor (R) 24.000.02, Enclosure B, SECONDARY CONTAINMENT DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE CORRECTION TABLES (R)

Tools and Equipment Required:

Calculator 24.000.02, Attachment 4, Step 10.0 (Page 7 of 13).

24.000.02, Attachment 5, Step 5.0 (Page 6 of 10).

24.000.02, Enclosure B, Pages 1 and 2.

Initial Conditions:

You are an extra person on shift.

The plant is in MODE 4.

Movement of recently irradiated fuel assemblies is taking place in the Spent Fuel Pool.

It is currently Sunday Nightshift.

Secondary Containment Diff Pressure was recorded on 24.000.02, Attachment 4, Step 10.0 as shown on the supplied attachment.

An NO has just called in with the Secondary Containment Differential Pressure readings shown on the supplied data sheet.

RB5 Temperature from IPCS Pt T41DT2408 (EOP Log No. 6) is 70°F.

Outside Air Temperature from IPCS (MET Display) is 40°F.

Initiating Cue(s):

The CRS directs you to calculate Division 1 and 2 Secondary Containment Differential Pressure in accordance with 24.000.02, Attachment 4, Step 10.0 Secondary Containment Vacuum.

Terminating Cue(s):

Secondary Containment Vacuum has been determined by calculation.

Task Standard:

Perform Secondary Containment Vacuum Calculation in accordance with 24.000.02, Attachment 4, Step 10.0.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Secondary Containment Vacuum No.: JP-OP-802-4101-191 Revision: 0 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Licensed Operator Exam Information (required for NRC exams)

Safety Function/Category:

N/A K/A

Reference:

(from NUREG 1123)

K/A SYSTEM: 290001 Secondary Containment K/A STATEMENT:

A4. Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room:

A4.01 Reactor building differential pressure: Plant-Specific.3.3 / 3.4 Generic:

2.1.45 Ability to identify and interpret diverse indications to validate the response of another indication. 4.3 / 4.3 Maintenance Rule Safety Classification:

N/A Maintenance Rule Risk Significant? (Yes or No)

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Secondary Containment Vacuum No.: JP-OP-802-4101-191 Revision: 0 Page 1 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Start Time ELEMENT STANDARD CUE:

Provide examinee with Cue Sheet and copies of 24.000.02, Attachment 4, Step 10.0 (Page 7 of 13), 24.000.02, Attachment 5, Step 5.0 (Page 6 of 10) and 24.000.02, Enclosure B, Pages 1 and 2.

1.

Highest Reading (Least Negative) Sensor Location (North, South, East, West) T41-N342A/B, N343A/B, N344A/B, N345A/BP.

1.

Determines that the highest reading (least negative) sensor is T41-N345A, which is a West sensor. Records Sensor Location as either T41-N345A or West.

2.

RB5 Temperature from IPCS Pt T41DT2408 (EOP Log No. 6) (°F).

2.

Records RB5 Temperature as 70°F.

3.

Outside Air Temperature from IPCS (MET Display) (°F).

3.

Records Outside Air Temperature as 40°F.

4.

Enclosure B DP Correction Factor [C].

4.

Refers to Enclosure B Table 1 (for a West Transmitter Controlling) and records DP Correction Factor as 0.039.

5.

Calculate Div 1 Secondary Containment Diff Pressure Corrected [A + C].

5.

Calculates and records Div 1 Secondary Containment Diff Pressure as -0.17.

6.

Calculate Div 2 Secondary Containment Diff Pressure Corrected [B + C].

6.

Calculates and records Div 2 Secondary Containment Diff Pressure as -0.15.

7.

Verify Acceptance Criteria is met and initial for completion.

7.

Initials for completion.

CUE:

End JPM when Secondary Containment Vacuum has been determined by calculation.

______ SATISFACTORY

______ UNSATISFACTORY Stop Time

Critical Step

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Secondary Containment Vacuum No.: JP-OP-802-4101-191 Revision: 0 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Evaluator Notes:

ENSURE ALL INDUSTRIAL AND PERSONNEL SAFETY PRACTICES ARE USED AND ENFORCED AT ALL TIMES.

FAILURE TO WEAR ALL PPE REQUIRED FOR TASK PERFORMANCE WILL RESULT IN FAILURE OF THIS JPM.

Generic Notes and Cues:

None System Specific Notes and Cues:

None Task Performance and Cues:

The Elements of this JPM are step by step in accordance with the procedure. The Standard is that the procedure is performed as written. The Cues are as listed below for indication or as each step is completed the appropriate information is reported to the examinee. Notify Examinee that time compression may be used for activities performed outside of the Control Room. Notify Examinee if JPM is Time Critical (only if JPM is NOT Alternate Path.)

Critical Steps:

Critical Tasks are identified by asterisk (*) and bolded steps on the cover sheet. Verify that the latest revision of the procedure is used and critical tasks are correctly identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Secondary Containment Vacuum No.: JP-OP-802-4101-191 Revision: 0 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Secondary Containment Vacuum No.: JP-OP-802-4101-191 Revision: 0 Page 4 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Secondary Containment Vacuum No.: JP-OP-802-4101-191 Revision: 0 Page 5 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS Reason for follow-up question(s):

Question:

Reference:

Response

Question:

Reference

Response

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Data Sheet: (JP-OP-802-4101-191)

The following have been recorded by the RB Rounds NO:

T41-N342A, RBHVAC RB North Wall Div 1 DP Xmtr: -0.23 wc T41-N342B, RBHVAC RB North Wall Div 2 DP Xmtr: -0.25 wc T41-N343A, RBHVAC RB South Wall Div 1 DP Xmtr: -0.22 wc T41-N343B, RBHVAC RB South Wall Div 2 DP Xmtr: -0.21 wc T41-N344A, RBHVAC RB East Wall Div 1 DP Xmtr: -0.22 wc T41-N344B, RBHVAC RB East Wall Div 2 DP Xmtr: -0.25 wc T41-N345A, RBHVAC RB West Wall Div 1 DP Xmtr: -0.19 wc T41-N345B, RBHVAC RB West Wall Div 2 DP Xmtr: -0.20 wc

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Cue Sheet: (JP-OP-802-4101-191)

Initial Conditions:

You are an extra person on shift.

The plant is in MODE 4.

Movement of recently irradiated fuel assemblies is taking place in the Spent Fuel Pool.

It is currently Sunday Nightshift.

Secondary Containment Diff Pressure was recorded on 24.000.02,, Step 10.0 as shown on the supplied attachment.

An NO has just called in with the Secondary Containment Differential Pressure readings shown on the supplied data sheet.

RB5 Temperature from IPCS Pt T41DT2408 (EOP Log No. 6) is 70°F.

Outside Air Temperature from IPCS (MET Display) is 40°F.

Initiating Cue(s):

The CRS directs you to calculate Division 1 and 2 Secondary Containment Differential Pressure in accordance with 24.000.02,, Step 10.0 Secondary Containment Vacuum.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Job Position SRO / RO No.

JP-OP-802-4101-192 Revision 0

JPM Title Determine Isolation Valves for a leak Duration 10 minutes Page COVER SHEET

2 times Duration for ILO Exams Examinee:

SRO / RO Evaluator:

Validating Representatives Name: Ken Griffin / Phil Heuker JPM Type:

Normal / Alternate Path / Time Critical Evaluation Method:

Perform / Walkthrough / Discuss Start Time (Circle method used)

Plant / Simulator / Classroom Stop Time Total Time:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SUMMARY

Element S

U Comments Element S

U Comments

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

OPERATOR FUNDAMENTALS OBSERVATION Monitor operator fundamentals during the JPM set. Rate each area based on the criteria by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column. Indicate the comment number associated with the observation.

Operator Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Comment Number Monitoring Control Conservatism Teamwork Knowledge OVERALL EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

REMEDIAL CONTENT:

______ PASS

______ FAIL Evaluator Signature / Date:

/

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Isolation Valves for a leak No.: JP-OP-802-4101-192 Revision: 0 Page 1 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Monitoring Equipment status monitored at proper frequency, using multiple means if available.

Understood which indications were critical.

Some monitoring was performed but undue focus on task or lack of system knowledge prevented ideal monitoring.

Did not recognize key equipment status indicators, too much focus on single indications and ignored total system status.

Control Task preview used to prepare for job. Aware of control bands and maintained them.

Configuration control maintained.

Adequate control of system maintained throughout task but some improvements could be made such as better manual control or greater depth of knowledge for anticipating system response.

No anticipation of results of actions. Unaware or control bands or not able to maintain them. Lack of knowledge of how to control system parameters.

Conservatism Low threshold for identification of problems.

Questioning attitude. Uses stop when unsure if needed. Sensitive to nuclear safety.

Some opportunities existed to question before proceeding, High focus on task completion without consideration for other system affects.

Proceeds even when unsure with unanswered questions.

High threshold for problem conditions.

Teamwork Routinely communicates system status changes to the team. Communicates actions before taking them.

Communicated most status and actions. Some improvement would be warranted.

Routinely takes action without informing the team.

Knowledge Able to anticipate system response based on solid system knowledge. Good working knowledge of generic fundamentals to predict and monitor system response.

Plant, system, or generic fundamental knowledge has some gaps.

Unable to predict system response, unsure of generic fundamentals concepts related to plant operation.

Only relied on procedure for operating knowledge.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Isolation Valves for a leak No.: JP-OP-802-4101-192 Revision: 0 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Information System:

C1100 - Control Rod Drive System Task:

04A0003008 - Tag a system/component and sign on a Protection Contract

References:

Required (R) / Available (A) 6M721-5703-1, Control Rod Drive System (A)

Tools and Equipment Required:

None Initial Conditions:

You are an extra licensed operator assigned to shift.

Plant conditions are stable at 97% power.

The Reactor Building Nuclear Operator (NO) has called the control room and reported that he has discovered a large water leak from C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator, at the CRD Flow Control Station.

Initiating Cue(s):

The CRS directs you to obtain station references, determine the isolation valve(s) for C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator using the references, and determine any other equipment impacted by the isolation.

Terminating Cue(s):

Terminate the JPM when the valves required to isolate the air leak on C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator, have been identified.

Task Standard:

Obtain the station mechanical drawing, identify the valves required to isolate a leak from C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator, and identify any other impacted equipment.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Isolation Valves for a leak No.: JP-OP-802-4101-192 Revision: 0 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Licensed Operator Exam Information (required for NRC exams)

Safety Function:

SF1 - Reactivity Control K/A

Reference:

(from NUREG 1123)

K/A SYSTEM: Generic K/A STATEMENT:

2.2.41 Ability to obtain and interpret station electrical and mechanical drawings...................... 3.5 / 3.9 Maintenance Rule Safety Classification:

C1100-08 Maintenance Rule Risk Significant? (Yes or No)

No

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Isolation Valves for a leak No.: JP-OP-802-4101-192 Revision: 0 Page 4 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Start Time ELEMENT STANDARD CUE:

Provide Cue Sheet to Examinee.

1.

Access WebARMS to view the required mechanical drawing.

1.

Accesses WebARMS.

2.

Locate the CRD System FOS drawing.

2.

Locates drawing 6M721-5703-1, CRD System Drawing.

3.

Locate C11-R007, C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator, on the drawing.

3.

Locates C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator, on the drawing in section D-3.

NOTE: The following steps can be performed in any order.

4.

Locate high-side isolation valve for C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator.

4.

Determines that C1100-F051, CRD-Cooling Water Flow Transmitter C11-R007 High Source Valve, needs to be closed to isolate the leak from C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator.

5.

Locate low-side isolation valve for C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator.

5.

Determines that C1100-F050, CRD-Cooling Water Flow Transmitter C11-R007 Low Source Valve, needs to be closed to isolate the leak from C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator.

6.

Recognize that isolation of C11-R605, CRD Cooling Water Flow Indicator, will also occur.

6.

Identifies that isolation of C11-R605, CRD Cooling Water Flow Indicator, located in the Main Control Room, will also occur.

CUE:

Terminate the JPM when the valves required to isolate the leak from C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator, have been identified.

______ SATISFACTORY

______ UNSATISFACTORY Stop Time

Critical Step

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Isolation Valves for a leak No.: JP-OP-802-4101-192 Revision: 0 Page 5 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Evaluator Notes:

ENSURE ALL INDUSTRIAL AND PERSONNEL SAFETY PRACTICES ARE USED AND ENFORCED AT ALL TIMES.

Generic Notes and Cues:

None System Specific Notes and Cues:

None Task Performance and Cues:

The Elements of this JPM are step by step in accordance with the procedure. The Standard is that the procedure is performed as written. The Cues are as listed above for indication or as each step is completed the appropriate information is reported to the examinee.

Critical Steps:

Critical Tasks are identified by asterisk (*) and bolded steps on the cover sheet. Verify that the latest revision of the procedure is used and critical tasks are correctly identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Isolation Valves for a leak No.: JP-OP-802-4101-192 Revision: 0 Page 6 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS Reason for follow-up question(s):

Question:

Reference:

Response

Question:

Reference

Response

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Isolation Valves for a leak No.: JP-OP-802-4101-192 Revision: 0 Page 7 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 EVALUATOR KEY References (prints, etc.) used:

6M721-5703-1, CRD System Drawing.

Isolation(s) for C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator:

C1100-F051, CRD-Cooling Water Flow Transmitter C11R007 High Source Valve.

C1100-F050, CRD-Cooling Water Flow Transmitter C11R007 Low Source Valve.

When the C11-R007 is isolated, what other indication will be affected?

C11-R605, CRD Cooling Water Flow Indicator.

Where is this other indication located?

Located in the Main Control Room.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Cue Sheet: (JP-OP-802-4101-192)

Initial Conditions:

You are an extra licensed operator assigned to shift.

Plant conditions are stable at 97% power.

The Reactor Building Nuclear Operator (NO) has called the control room and reported that he has discovered a large water leak from C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator, at the CRD Flow Control Station.

Initiating Cue(s):

The CRS directs you to obtain station references, determine the isolation valve(s) for C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator using the references, and determine any other equipment impacted by the isolation.

Document your results below:

References (prints, etc.) used:

Isolation(s) for C11-R007, CRD Cooling Water to HCU Pressure Indicator:

When the C11-R007 is isolated, what other indication will be affected?

Where is this other indication located?

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Job Position RO No.

JP-OP-802-4101-193 Revision 0

JPM Title Calculate Stay time and determine if dose extension is needed.

Duration 20 minutes Page 1

2 times Duration for ILO Exams Examinee:

RO Evaluator:

Validating Representatives Name: Ken Griffin JPM Type:

Normal / Alternate Path / Time Critical Start Time Evaluation Method:

Perform / Walkthrough / Discuss Stop Time Location:

Plant / Simulator / Classroom Total Time:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SUMMARY

Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment

1.

2.

3.

4.

OPERATOR FUNDAMENTALS OBSERVATION Monitor operator fundamentals during the JPM set. Rate each area based on the criteria by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column. Indicate the comment number associated with the observation.

Operator Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Comment Number Monitoring Control Conservatism Teamwork Knowledge OVERALL EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

REMEDIAL CONTENT:

______ PASS

______ FAIL Evaluator Signature / Date:

/

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Estimated Dose and determine if dose extension is needed.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-193 Revision: 0 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Observation Criteria Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Monitoring Equipment status monitored at proper frequency, using multiple means if available.

Understood which indications were critical.

Some monitoring was performed but undue focus on task or lack of system knowledge prevented ideal monitoring.

Did not recognize key equipment status indicators, too much focus on single indications and ignored total system status.

Control Task preview used to prepare for job. Aware of control bands and maintained them.

Configuration control maintained.

Adequate control of system maintained throughout task but some improvements could be made such as better manual control or greater depth of knowledge for anticipating system response.

No anticipation of results of actions. Unaware or control bands or not able to maintain them. Lack of knowledge of how to control system parameters.

Conservatism Low threshold for identification of problems.

Questioning attitude. Uses stop when unsure if needed.

Sensitive to nuclear safety.

Some opportunities existed to question before proceeding, High focus on task completion without consideration for other system affects.

Proceeds even when unsure with unanswered questions.

High threshold for problem conditions.

Teamwork Routinely communicates system status changes to the team. Communicates actions before taking them.

Communicated most status and actions. Some improvement would be warranted.

Routinely takes action without informing the team.

Knowledge Able to anticipate system response based on solid system knowledge. Good working knowledge of generic fundamentals to predict and monitor system response.

Plant, system, or generic fundamental knowledge has some gaps.

Unable to predict system response, unsure of generic fundamentals concepts related to plant operation.

Only relied on procedure for operating knowledge.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Estimated Dose and determine if dose extension is needed.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-193 Revision: 0 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Information System:

N/A Task:

73443 - SOER 01-1 Rec. 5 - Radiation protection training and retraining for plant personnel should include a review of selected industry events involving large, unplanned exposures and the responsibility of individuals for the prevention of such events.

References:

Required (R) / Available (A)

MRP12, Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Thresholds (R)

Tools and Equipment Required:

Calculator Survey map of North RWCU Pump Room Initial Conditions:

You are an LNO on shift.

You must enter the N. RWCU Pump Room to perform an inspection of G33-F013A, North RWCU Pump Discharge Isolation Valve.

You will be working between the lead blanket and the pump casing to inspect the valve.

It would take longer to install more shielding than for you to perform your work.

The estimated time necessary to perform your work is 6 minutes.

Your exposure for the year is 753 mrem TEDE.

The situation is NOT an emergency, but there is no alternative to performing the inspection.

NO other individuals are available to perform the inspection.

Initiating Cue(s):

Refer to the survey map of the North RWCU Pump Room to determine the following:

Projected Dose for the job, total projected Accumulated Dose, if 80% of a Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline or federal dose limit will be exceeded.

Terminating Cue(s):

Candidate determines that a dose extension is not required.

Task Standard:

Accumulated dose is calculated and determination is made that authorization to exceed Fermi 2 Administrative Guidelines is not required per MRP 12.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Estimated Dose and determine if dose extension is needed.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-193 Revision: 0 Page 4 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Licensed Operator Exam Information (required for NRC exams)

Safety Function:

N/A K/A

Reference:

(from NUREG 1123)

K/A SYSTEM: Generic K/A STATEMENT:

2.3.4 Knowledge of radiation exposure limits under normal or emergency conditions........ 3.2 / 3.1 Maintenance Rule Safety Classification:

N/A Maintenance Rule Risk Significant? (Yes or No)

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Estimated Dose and determine if dose extension is needed.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-193 Revision: 0 Page 5 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Start Time ELEMENT STANDARD CUE:

Provide candidate with Cue Sheet, copy of MRP12, and survey map of North RWCU Pump Room.

1.

Review survey map and determine dose rate in area of G3300-F013A.

1.

Determines dose rate in area of G3300-F013A to be 6,000 mr/hr.

2.

Calculate projected dose for the inspection.

2.

Calculates Projected Dose =

6/60 hr

6,000 mr/hr =

0.1 hr

6000 mr/hr = 600 mr

3.

Calculate projected accumulated dose for the year.

3.

Calculates Projected Accumulated Dose

=

600 mr + 753 mr = 1353 mr = 1.353 R CUE:

As supervisor, acknowledge the report.

4.

Inform immediate supervisor when accumulated dose is 80% of a Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline or federal dose limit.

4.

Determines (Circles NO) that supervisor does NOT need to be informed.

NOTE: Fermi 2 Admin Guideline = 2 REM/yr TEDE.

80% of this guideline is 1.6 REM TEDE.

The examinee may determine that the supervisor needs to be informed that accumulated dose is approaching 80%

of the Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline.

CUE: End JPM when information has been calculated and provided to supervisor.

______ SATISFACTORY

______ UNSATISFACTORY Stop Time

Critical Step

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Estimated Dose and determine if dose extension is needed.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-193 Revision: 0 Page 6 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Evaluator Notes:

The Plant can be in any mode of operation to conduct this JPM.

This JPM may be started at the CRS Desk in the Simulator.

ENSURE ALL INDUSTRIAL AND PERSONNEL SAFETY PRACTICES ARE USED AND ENFORCED AT ALL TIMES.

Generic Notes and Cues:

None System Specific Notes and Cues:

None Task Performance and Cues:

The Elements of this JPM are step by step in accordance with the procedure. The Standard is that the procedure is performed as written. The Cues are as listed above for indication or as each step is completed the appropriate information is reported to the examinee.

Critical Steps:

Critical Tasks are identified by asterisk (*) and bolded steps on the cover sheet. Verify that the latest revision of the procedure is used and critical tasks are correctly identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Estimated Dose and determine if dose extension is needed.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-193 Revision: 0 Page 7 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS Reason for follow-up question(s):

Question:

Reference:

Response

Question:

Reference

Response

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Calculate Estimated Dose and determine if dose extension is needed.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-193 Revision: 0 Page 8 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 EVALUATOR KEY Projected Dose for the inspection: 600 mrem Projected Accumulated Dose (TEDE) after the inspection: 1353 mrem Inform supervisor that projected Accumulated Dose (TEDE) will be within 80% of a Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline or the federal dose limit:

YES NO (Circle one)

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Cue Sheet: (JP-OP-802-4101-193)

Initial Conditions:

You are an LNO on shift.

You must enter the N. RWCU Pump Room to perform an inspection of G33-F013A, North RWCU Pump Discharge Isolation Valve.

You will be working between the lead blanket and the pump casing to inspect the valve.

It would take longer to install more shielding than for you to perform your work.

The estimated time necessary to perform your work is 6 minutes.

Your exposure for the year is 753 mrem TEDE.

The situation is NOT an emergency, but there is no alternative to performing the inspection.

NO other individuals are available to perform the inspection.

Initiating Cue(s):

Refer to the survey map for the North RWCU Pump Room to determine the following.

Projected Dose for the inspection: ______________________________

Projected Accumulated Dose (TEDE) after the inspection: ___________

Inform supervisor that projected Accumulated Dose (TEDE) will be within 80% of a Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline or the federal dose limit:

YES NO (Circle one)

ML19248C636

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

References:

Reference:

Reference:

Response

Response

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

References:

Reference:

Reference:

Response

Response

SUMMARY

References:

Reference:

Reference:

Response

Response

SUMMARY

References:

Reference:

Reference:

Response

Response

Navigation menu

ML19248C636

Text

SUMMARY

References:

Reference:

Reference:

Response

Response

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

References:

Reference:

Reference:

Response

Response

SUMMARY

References:

Reference:

Reference:

Response

Response

SUMMARY

References:

Reference:

Reference:

Response

Response

Navigation menu

Search