ML19241B212

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-482/79-04 on 790305-08 & 15 & Notice of Violation
ML19241B212
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 04/11/1979
From: Seyfrit K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Koester G
KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML19241B213 List:
References
NUDOCS 7907130126
Download: ML19241B212 (3)


See also: IR 05000482/1979004

Text

.

  1. " "'C Of

UNITE D STATES

.

o

NUCLE AR 8?rGtJLATORY M'.

m4wa

y

y

) ,~

etEulON IV

g .;

-

g

c

  • 1 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000

g Qi

,[

ARLINGTON, TEX AS 76011

J

%

s

April 11,1979

In Reply Refer To:

RIV

Docket tio. STN 50-482/Rpt. 79-04

Kansas Gas and Electric Company

ATTN: Mr. G. L. Koester

Vice President-Operations

Post Office Box 208

Wichita, Kansas

67201

Gentlemen:

This refers to the inroection conducted by Mr. C. R. Oberg and other

members of our staff during the period March 5-8, 1979, of activities

authorized by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-147 for Wol f Creek,

Unit No.1, and to the discussion of our findings with you and other

members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection. This also

refers to a series of visits made to the Portland Cement Associatic.n

(PCA) during the months of February and March 1979, and to our meeting

with you and members of your staff on March 15, 1979, in the Region IV

office.

Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed

in '-he enclosed inspection report. Within these areas, the inspection

consisted of selective examination of procedures and representative

records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspectors.

We have also examined actions you have taken with regard to previously

identified inspection findings. The status of these items is identified

in paragraph 2 of the enclosed report.

During the inspection, it was found that certain activities under your

license appear to be in nonco.npliance with Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 of

the NRC Regulations, " Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power

Plants." The item of noncompliance and references to the pertinent

requirements are identified in the enclosed Notice of Violation.

This notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201

of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal

Regulations.

Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office, within

30 days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement or explanation

/

7 ti 7

L0

JUJ

'_;

/26

g

>

i907130

.

Kansas Gas and Electric

Company

-2-

April 11, 1979

in reply including: (1) corrective steps which have been taken by you,

and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to

avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will

be achieved.

During this particular inspection, only one item of noncomplionce was

identified.

However, during the inspection our review of events leading

to your stop-work order relative to Class 1 concrete raised general concern

on our part in terms of your ce strol of the quality of construction.

Of

further concern, Region IV (wi 1 support from Regions I, II and III) has

conducted over thirty inspectitis of construction activities associated with

the Wolf Creek plant since issua.'ce of a Construction Permit in May 1977.

During this twenty-two month period, thirty-one items of noncompliance

have been detected, twenty-two of which involved Criterion V of Appendix

B to 10 CFR Part 50 for failure to follow or provide procedures on safety

related activities. On several occasions during the twenty-two month

period, the Region IV Project Inspector discussed QA staffing concerns

with you.

This matter is documented in IE Inspection Reports 77-05, 77-07, 77-09

and 78-08.

Moreover, similar concerns were expressed by the Reactor

Construction Branch Chief during meetings with you and your staff on

August 9, 1977, and December 5, 1978. This matter, along with the con-

cern over the numerous items of noncompliance involving Criterion V, was

also the subject of an enforcement meeting conducted by the Region IV

Construction Branch Chief in the corporate offices of KG&E on August 1,

1978, and is documented in IE Inspection Report No. 78-09.

During these

several maetings, commitments were made by KG&E site and corporate manage-

ment to intensify the on-site QA surveillance program.

It was not until

after the concreting problems were experienced in December 1978, which

led to an eighty-nine day hold on placement of safety related concrete

and the recent stop-work order of March 8, 1979, that additional QA people

were added to the site QA organization.

In view of the foregoing, and in the interest of clear understanding of

the courses of action available to the Commission if a continuing pattern

of noncompliance persists, upon receipt of this letter please contact me

to discuss arrangements for a meeting to be held in the Region IV office.

The general purpose of the meeting will be to discuss:

1.

The specific programmatic and personnel plans for prompt identifi-

cation, and correction of, the factors which have caused an apparent

degradation of management controls and which have resulted in personnel

errors leading to significant events and noncompliances.

, , , .

.

1

h ') fO

'

.

Kansas Gas and Electric

Company

-3-

April 11, 1979

2.

The schedule for corrective action.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part

2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the

enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document

Room.

If the report contains any information that you believe to be

proprietary, it is necessary that you submit a written application to

this office, within 20 days of the date of this letter, requesting that

such information be withheld from public disclosure.

The application

must include a full statement of the reasons why it is claimed that the

information is proprietary. The application should be prepared so that

any proprietary information identified is contained in an enclosure to

the application, since the application without the enclosure will also

be placed in the Public Document Room.

If we do not hear from you in

this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in

the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be

pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,-

k.

0"

t

.

K. V. Seyfrit /

Director

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix A, Notice of Violation

2.

IE Inspection Report No. STN 50-482/79-04

'l)

e