ML19225A400
| ML19225A400 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 05/25/1979 |
| From: | Dail L DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19225A388 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7907190132 | |
| Download: ML19225A400 (2) | |
Text
--
-f DUIm POWER COMPANY ELECTRIC CEYTER, BOX 33180. CH ARLOTTE N. C.
2s242
]
,s
--! C L c omt e
o.0% 7.'la'L.
May 25, 1979 g
- co
=
>z
,O
~
.m co Q
~
Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director li ci, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comissioa co 101 Marietta Street, Suite 31M Atlanta, Georgia 30303 7
Re: Catawba Nuclear Staduo IE:II:WPA Inspection Report:
Go-434'? 7 M-6 Duke File: CN-1412.il-;
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
In the subject Inspection Report, one infraction and one deficiency Enclosed are Duke Power Company's responses to were identified.Duke does not consider any of the infonnation in the these items.
referenced Inspection Report to be proprietary.
Very truly yours, L. C. Dail Vice President Design Engineering JDW/jmi Attachment
., q
,I LI-7807290/ 3 2 qg OFFK1AL COPY
DUKE'S RESPONSE TO INFRACTION 50-413/79-06-01 This infraction concerns the failure to identify, record and evaluate the defects remaining on the concrete containment dome pour number 32.
As a corrective measure, the entire exterior surface of dome pour number 32 was reinspected in accordance with the criteria established per nonconforming item report 5252.
All areas requiring repair were also completed as instructed by the resolution of nonconforming item report 5252.
To avoid further nonccmpliance, responsible individuals have been instructed in the importance of following the instructions as detailed on nonconforming item reports.
Full compliance was achieved April 30, 1979.
DUKE'S RESPONSE TO DEFICIENCY 50-414/79-06-01 This deficiency concerns litter and debris located on a platform which partially covered Unit 2 refueling canal. The area in question was cleared of litter and debris to meet good construction site housekeeping practices as required by a Zone VI area.
To avoid further noncompliance, responsible individuals have been in-structed in the importance of naintaining designated zones to the proper housekeeping requirements.
Full compliance was achieved April 10, 1979.
e
-i na!
^
[) /; U LL'