ML19225A400

Responds to NRC 790502 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-413/79-06 & 50-414/79-06.Corrective Actions: Exterior Surface Dome Pour Number 32 Reinspected & Repaired & Area Cleared of Debris

ML19225A400
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	05/25/1979
From:	Dail L DUKE POWER CO.
To:	James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19225A388	List: ML19225A400
References
NUDOCS 7907190132
Download: ML19225A400 (2)

Text

-- ..

. -f

• DUIm POWER COMPANY ELECTRIC CEYTER, BOX 33180. CH ARLOTTE N. C. 2s242 L c omt

] ,s

--! C e

May 25, 1979 g - co o.0% 7.'la'L. = >z

~

,O

.m

' co Q

~ , . .

Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director ci, li .

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comissioa co .

101 Marietta Street, Suite 31M Atlanta, Georgia 30303 7

Re: Catawba Nuclear Staduo IE:II:WPA Inspection Report: Go-434'? 7 M-6 Duke File: CN-1412.il-;

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

In the subject Inspection Report, one infraction and one deficiency were identified. Enclosed are Duke Power Company's responses to these items. Duke does not consider any of the infonnation in the referenced Inspection Report to be proprietary.

Very truly yours, L. C. Dail Vice President Design Engineering JDW/jmi Attachment

., q

,I LI-7807290/ 3 2 qg OFFK1AL COPY

DUKE'S RESPONSE TO INFRACTION 50-413/79-06-01 This infraction concerns the failure to identify, record and evaluate the defects remaining on the concrete containment dome pour number 32.

As a corrective measure, the entire exterior surface of dome pour number 32 was reinspected in accordance with the criteria established per nonconforming item report 5252. All areas requiring repair were also completed as instructed by the resolution of nonconforming item report 5252.

To avoid further nonccmpliance, responsible individuals have been instructed in the importance of following the instructions as detailed on nonconforming item reports.

Full compliance was achieved April 30, 1979.

DUKE'S RESPONSE TO DEFICIENCY 50-414/79-06-01 This deficiency concerns litter and debris located on a platform which partially covered Unit 2 refueling canal. The area in question was cleared of litter and debris to meet good construction site housekeeping practices as required by a Zone VI area.

To avoid further noncompliance, responsible individuals have been in-structed in the importance of naintaining designated zones to the proper housekeeping requirements.

Full compliance was achieved April 10, 1979.

e

^

-i na!

[) /; U LL'