Text

Amend 4 to Environ Rept
	ML19224D765
Person / Time
Site:	New Haven
Issue date:	07/01/1979
From:	; NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORP.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML19224D760	List: ML19224D759; ML19224D765;
References
	ENVR-790701, NUDOCS 7907170016
	Download: ML19224D765 (67)
	v • d • e

NYSESG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR INSERTION INSTEUCTIONS FUR AMENDMENT 4 hemove old pages and insert Amendmen'- 4 pages as instructed below (amendment pages bear the amendment number and date at the foot of the page) .

Vertical bars (change bars) have been placed in the outside margins or revised text pages and tables to show the location of any technical changes originating with this amendment. Some pages bear a new amendment designation, but no change bars, because revisions on other pages in that section caused a text shift. A f ew unrevised pages have been reprinted because they f all within a run of closely spaced revised pages. No charge bars are used on figures or on new sections, appendices, questions and responses, etc. Change bars f rom previous amendments have been deleted on pages revised by this amendment.

Transmittal letters along with these insertion instructions should either be filed or entered in Voluma I of Part I, in front of any existing letters, ins tructions, distributic a lists, etc.

LEGEND Remove / Insert Columns Entries beginning with "T" or "F" designate table or figure numbers, respectively. All other entries are page numbers:

T2.3-14 = Table 2.3-14 FG5-3 = Figure GS-3 2.1-9 = Page 2.1-9 EP2-1 = Page EP2-1 vii = Page vii Pages print ^d back to back are indicated by a "/":

1. 2- f '6 = Page 1.2-5 backed by Page 1.2-6 T2.3-14 (5 of 5) /15(1 of 3) = Table 2.3-14, sheet 5 of 5, backed by Table 2.3-15, sheet 1 of 3 Location Column Ch = Chapter, V = Volume, S = Section, Ap = Appendix Remove Insert Location None MEP-1/ blank before Summary Table of Contents EP2-1 thru -11/ blank EP2-1 thru -11/ blank after Ch2 tab 2.1-iii thru -v/ blank 2.1-111 thru -v/ blank S2.1 2.1-1 thru -4 2.1-1 thru -4a/ blank 2.1-17/-18 2.1-17 thru -18a/ blank 2.1-23/-24 2.1-23 thru -24a/ blank 2.1-31 thru -36 2.1-31 thru -36 T2.1-1 (1 of 1)/-2 (1 of 1) T2.1-1 (1 of 1)/-2 (1 of 1)

T2.1-10 (1 of 1) /-11(1 of 1) T2.1-10 (1 of 1) /-11 (1 of 1)

None T2.1-30A (1 of 1) / blank 2.6-3/-4 2.6-3/-4 S2.6 EP3-1/-2 EP3-1/-2 after Ch3 tab Amendment 4 _ 1 of 2 July 1979 b 0 7907170BNr

NYSESG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR Remove Insert Ix> cation 3-ix thru -xv/ blank 3-ix thru -xv/ blank EP4-1/-2 EP4-1/-2 atter Ch4 tab 4-1 thru 4-iv 4-1 thru 4-iv 4.1-17/-18 4.1-17 thru 4.1-18a/ blank S4.1 EPS-1/-2 EP5-1/-2 after Ch5 tab T5.1-1 (1 of 1)/-2 (1 of 1) T5.1-1 (1 of 1)/-2 (1 of 1) SS.)

EP8-1/ blank EP8-1/ blank after Ch8 tab 8.2-11/-12 8.2-11/-12 S8.2 9

< G

/

\J

' "J U 9

Amendment 4 2 of 2 July 1979

NYSE6G EP ND: ?!AVEN-NUCLEAP MASTER LIST OF EFFE:.TIVE PAGES (Amendment 4, July '89D)

Amendn.ent Chapter fand If.Tes) Number 1 (2) 2 2(11) 4 3 (2) 4 4 (4) 4 5 (2) 4 6 (2) 3 7 (1) 3 8 (1) 4 9 (1) 0 10 (1) 1 11(1) 1 12 (1) 0 13 (1) 0 App 1.1A (1) 0 App 2.2A(2) 0 App 2.2B (1) 0 App 2.2C(1) 0 App 2.2D (1) 0 App 2.2E (1) 0 App 2.2F (1) 0 App 2.2G (1) 0 App 2.3A (1) 0 App 2.3B (1) 0 App 2.3c(1) 0 App 2.3D (1) 1 App 2.4A(1) 0 App 2.5A(1) 0 App 2.5B (1) 0 App 2.5C (4) 1 App 2.5D (1) 0 App 2.5E (1) 0 App 2.5F (1) 0 App 2.5G (1) 0 App 2.5H(1) 2 App 2.5I(1) 2 App 2.5J (1) 0 App 2.5K (1) 0 App 2.5L(1) 0 App 2.5M (1) 1 App 2.7A(1) 0 App 2.7B (1) 0 App 2.7C (1) 0 App 2.7D (1) 0 Ispp 2.7E (1) 0 App 2.7F (1) 0 App 3.5A(1) 0 App 3.5B (1) 3 App 4.2A (1) 0 App 5.2A(1) 3 App 5.3A (1) 3 App 6.1A(1) 1 MEP-1

NYSESG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR 9 LIST Ok EFFFMIVE P%ES (Amenciment 4, July 1979)

Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqure (F) Number 2.1-1 thru 2.1-11 1 2.1-111 thru 2.1-v 4 2.1-vii/-viii 3 2.1-1 thru 2.1-4a 4 2.1-5 thru 2.1-6 0 2.1-7 thru 2.1-14a 2 2.1-15 thru 2.1-16 0 2.1-17 thru 2.1-18a 4 2.1-21 thru 2.1-23 0 2.1-24 thru 2.1-24a 4 2.1-25 thru 2.1-27 0 2.1-28 1 2.1-29 thru 2.1-31 3 2.1-32 thru 2.1-36 4 T2.1-1 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-2 (1 of 1) 4 T2.1-3 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-4 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-5 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-6 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-7 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-8 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-9(1 of 1) 0 T2.1-10 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-11 (1 of 1) 4 T2.1-12 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-13 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-14 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-15 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-16 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-17 (1 ot 1) 0 T2.1-18 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-19(1 of 1) 0 T2.1-20 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.1-21 (1 of 1) 2 T2.1-22 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-23 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 1 T2.1-23A (1 of 1) 1 T2.1-24 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.1-24A(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 1 T2.1-25 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-26 (1 of 9 thru 9 of 9) 0 T2.1-27 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T.2.1-27A (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 2 T2.1-28 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.1-29 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-30 (1 of 1) 0 2.1-32 thru 2.1-36 4 T2.1-31 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 T2.1-32 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.1-33 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-34 (1 of 1) 1 T2.1-35 (1 of 1) 1 T2.1-36 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-37 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-38 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-39 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-40 (1 of in 0 T2,1-41 (* of 2 thru 2 of 2) O EP2-1 h ,h

NYSESG ER NEW 11AVEN Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqure (F) Num ber T2.1-42 81 of 1) 0 T2.1-43 (1 of 1) 0 T2.1-44 (1 of 1) 1 T2.1-45 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.1-46 (1 of 16 thru 5 of 16) 0 T2.1-46 (6 of 16 thru 16 of 16) 1 T2.1-47 (1 of 1) 3 T2.1-48 (1 of 1) 3 F2.1-1 thru 2.1-6 0 F2.1-6A 1 F2.1-7 thru 2.1-9 0 F2.1-9A 2 F2.1-16 1 F2.1-17 thru 2.1-18 0 F2.1-19 thru 2.1-26 3 2.2-1 thru 2.2-111 1 2.2-iv 2 2.2-v thru 2.2-xxix 1 2.2-1 thru 2.2-15 0 2.2-16 3 2.2-17 thru 2.2-30 0 2.2-37 thru 2.2-38 1 2.2-39 thru 2.2-84 0 2.2-85 thru 2.2-86a 1 2.2-87 thru 2.2-99 0 2.2-100 thru 2.2-100a 1 2.2-101 thru 2.2-111 0 2.2-112 thru 2.2-112a 1 2.2-113 thru 2.2-132 0 2.2-133 thru 2.2-134b 1 2.2-135 thru 2.2-150 0 2.2-151 thru 2.2-152b 1 2.2-153 thru 2.2-162 0 2.2-163 thru 2.2-164a 3 2.2-165 thru 2.2-180 0 2.2-181 thru 2,2-188 1 2.2-189 1 2.2-190 thru 2.2-190a 3 2.2-191 thru 2.2-192 1 2.2-193 0 2.2-194 thru 2.2-198 1 2.2-199 thru 2.2-200 0 2.2-201 thru 2.2-208a 1 2.2-209 thru 2.2-219 0 2.2-220 thru 2.2-220a 1 2.2-221 thru 2.2-223 0 2.2-224 thru 2.2-224a 1 2.2-225 thru 2.2-232 0 2.2-233 thru 2.2-234a 1 2.2-235 thru 2.2-236 0 2.2-237 thru 2.2-238 3 2.2-239 thru 2.2-242 0 T2.2-1 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-2 (1 of 5 thru 5 of 5) 0 T2.2-3 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-4 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-511 ot 1) 0 T2.2-6(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-7 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-8 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-9(1 of 11 thru 11 of 11) 0 T2.2-10 (1 of 1) O EP2-2 -

}g)

NYSL6G ER NEW HAVEN Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Figure (F) Nitmber T2.2-11(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-12 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-13 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-14(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-15 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-16(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-17 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-18 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-19 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-20 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-21(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-22 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-23 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-24 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-25 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-26 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-27 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-28 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-29 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-30 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-31 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-32 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-33 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-34 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-35 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-36 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-37 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-38 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-39 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-40 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-41 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-42 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-43 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-44 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-45 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-46 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-47 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-48 (1 or 1) 0 T2.2-49 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-50(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-51 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-52 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-53 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-54 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2 55 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-56 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-57 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-58 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-59 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-60 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-61 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-62 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-63 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-G4 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-65 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-66 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-67 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-6B (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-69 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-70 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-71(1 of 15 0 T2.2-72 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-73 (1 of 1) 0 ,j7 ..j f '

Iu EP2-3

NYSELG ER NEW HAVEN Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqure (F) Numbe r T2.2-74 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-75 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-76 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-77 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-78 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-79 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-60 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-81(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-82 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-83 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-84 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-85 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-86 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-87 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-88 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-89(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-90 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-91 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-92 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-93 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-94 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-95 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-96 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-97 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-98 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-99 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-100(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-101(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-102 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-103 (1 of 1) 0 T2.?-104 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-105(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-106 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-107 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-108 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-109(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-110 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-111(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-112 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-113 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-114 (1 of 10 thru 10 of 10) 0 T2.2-115(1 of 11 thru 11 of 11) 0 T2.2-116 (1 of 7 th2 u 7 of 7) C T2.2-117(1 of 9 thru 9 of 9) 0 T2.2-118 (1 of 7 thru 7 of 7) 0 T2.2-119 (1 of 10 thru 10 of 10) 0 T2.2-120(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-121(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-122 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-123 (1 of 10 thru 10 of 10) 0 T2.2-124(1 of i) 0 T2.2-125 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-126 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-127 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-128 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-129 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-130(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-131 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.2-132 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-133 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-134 (1 of 1) 0 ,

T2.2-135il of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 i D' '")

T2.2-136 (1 of 1) 0 ,

b,

'J EP2-4

NYSE6G ER NEW 11AVEN Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqure (F) Number T2.2-137 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-138 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) o T2.2-139 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.2-140 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-141(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-142(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-143 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.2-144 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.2-145 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-146 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-147 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-148 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-149 (1 of 2 thru 2 or 2) 0 T2.2-150 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-151(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-152 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-153 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-154 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-155 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-156 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-157 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-158 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-159 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-160 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-16) (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-162 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-163 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-164(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-165 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-166 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-167(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-168(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-169 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-170 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-171(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-172 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-173 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-174 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-175 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-176 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-177 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-178 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-179 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-130(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-181 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-182 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-183 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-184 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-185 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-186 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-187 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-188 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-169 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-190 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-191(1 of 6 thru 6 of 6) 0 T2.2-192 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-193 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-194(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-195 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-196(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-197 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-198(1 of 1) 0 / ii t

~

T2.2-199 (1 of 1) 0 J J [)

L lbJ EP2-5

NYSESG ER NEW !!AVEN Page, Table (T) , or Amend: nut Figure (F) NtLite r T2.2-200 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-201(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-202 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-203 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-204(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-205 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-206 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-207 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-208 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-209 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-210 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-211(1 of 1) 0 T2,2-212 (1 of 1) 1 T2.2-213 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-214 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-215 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 T2.2-216 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-217 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.2-218(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-219(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-220 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-221(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-222 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-223 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-224 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-225 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-226 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-227 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.2-228 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-229(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-230 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-231(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-232 (1 of 1) 3 T2.2-233 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-234 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.2-235 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-236 (1 of 1) O T2.2-237(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-238 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-239 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-240 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-241 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-242(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-243 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-2c 4 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-245 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-246 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-247 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-248 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-249 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-250 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-251(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-252(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-253 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-254 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 T2.2-255 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-256 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-257 (1 of 1) 0 -

.h T2.2-258 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 *-

3' T2.2-259(1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 N T2.2-260(1 of 5 T2.2-261(1 of 2 thru thru 5

2 of of 5) 2)

O 0

c(s T2.2-262 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 'i) ) #

EP2-6

NYSELG ER NEW HAVLN Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqure (F) N umber T2.2-263 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.2-264 (1 of 1) 0 12.2-265 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-266 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-267(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-268 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-269 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-270 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-27)(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-272 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-273 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.2-274 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-275 (1 or I) 0 T2.2-276(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-277 (1 of 7 thru 7 of 7) 0 T2.2-278 (1 or 1) 0 T2.2-279 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.2-200 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-281(1 ot 2 thru 2 of 2) 1 T2.2-282(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-283 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-284(1 of 1) 0 T2.2-285 (1 of 1) 0 T2.2-286 (1 of 1) 0 F2.2-1 1 F2.2-2 thru 2.2-84 0 F2.2-85 2 F2.2-86 thru 2.2-87 0 F2.2-88 2 F2.2-89 thru 2.2-107 0 2.3-1 thru 2.3-xi 1 2.3-xiii 1 2.3-1 0 2.3-2 thru 2.3-2a 1 2.3-3 thru 2.3-14 0 2.3-15 0 2.3-16 thru 2.3-16a 1 2.3-17 thru 2.3-26 0 2.3-27 thru 2.3-28 1 2.3-29 thru 2.3-34 0 T2.3-1 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.3-2 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-3(1 of 1) 0 T2. 3-4 (1 of 11 0 T2.3-5 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-6 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-7 (1 of 4) 0 T2.3-8(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-9 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-10 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-11 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-12 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-13 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-14 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-15 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-16 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-17 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-18 (1 of 1) 0

' T2.3-19 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-20 (1 or 1) d T2.3-21 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-22 (1 of 1) 0 - .

J.)b '

o. .

EP2-7

NYSELG ER NEW 11AVEN Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqure (F) Nwrh?r T2.3-23 (1 of 1) 0 T2. 3-24 (1 of 13 0 T2.3-25(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-26 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-27 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-2B (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-29 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-30 (1 of 1) 9 T2.3-31 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-32 8 2 of 1) 0 T2.3-33 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-34 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-35 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-36 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-37 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-38 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-39 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-40 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-41(1 of 1) 0 T2.3442(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-43(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-44 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-45 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-46 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-47 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-48 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-49 (1 or 1) 0 T2.3-50 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-51 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-52 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-53 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-54 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-55 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-56 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-57 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-58 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-59(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-60 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-61 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-62 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-63 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-64 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-65 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-66 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-67 (1 of 1) 0 12.3-68(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-69(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-70(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-71 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-72 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-73(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-74 (1 ot 1) 0 T2.3-75 (1 of 1) 0 T2. 3-76 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-77 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-78(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-79 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-80 (1 of 1) 0 ,

T2.3-81 (1 of 1) 0 \ "[. 3 T2.3-82 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-83 (1 of 1) 0 < 43 T2.3-84 (1 of 1) 0 9 )

T2.1-85 (1 of 1) 0 2P2-8

NYSE6G ER NEW llAVEN

@ Page, Table (T) , or An.endment Fiqure* (F) NumlM' T2.3-8b (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-87 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-88 (1 or 1) G T2.3-89 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-90 (1 of 7 thru 7 of 7) 0 T2.3-91(1 of 7 thru 7 of 7) 0 T2.3-92 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-93 (1 of 7 thru 7 of 7) 0 T2.3-94 (1 of in 0 T2.3-95 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-96 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-97 (1 ct 1) 0 T2.3-98 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-99 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-100 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-101 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3 - 102 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-103 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-104 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-105 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-106 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-107 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-108(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-109 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-110 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-111(1 of 1) ()

T2.3-112 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-113 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-114 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-115 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-116 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-117(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-118 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-119(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-120(1 of 1) 0 T2.3-121 (1 c1 1) 0 T2.3-121A (1 of 1) 1 T2.3-122 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-123 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-124 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-125 (1 ot 1) 0 T2.3-126 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-127 (1 or 1) 0 T2.3-128 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-129 (1 of 1) 0 T2.3-130 (1 of 1) 0 F2.3-1 thru 2.3 -14 0 2.4-1 thru 2.4-vii 1 2.4-1 thru 2.4-6 0 2.4-7 1 2.4-8 taru 2.4-30 0 2.4-31 1 2.4-32 thru 2.4-32a 3 2.4-33 thru 2.4-36 1 2.4-3ba 3 2.4-37 thru 2.4-43 0 2.4-44 1 2.4-4 5 thru 2.4-52 0 T2.4-1 (1 of 1) 0 T2.4-2 (1 of 1) 0 '/~' ,

T2.4-3 (1 of 1) 0 -- J O j'-

T2.4-4 (1 of 1) 0 EP2-9

NYSE6G ER NEW IIAVEN Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqure (F) Number T2.4-5 (1 of 6 thru 6 of 6) 0 T2.4-6 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.4-7(1 of 8 thru 8 of 8) 0 T2.4-8 (1 of 1) 0 T2.4-9 (1 of 1) 0 T2.4-10 (1 of 1) 0 T2.4-11(1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.4-12 (1 of 1) 0 T2.4-13 (1 of 1) 0 22.4-14 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.4-15(1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.4-16 (1 of 2 th 2 of 2) 0 T2.4-17 (1 of 1; O T2.4-18 (1 of 1) 0 T2.4-19 (1 of 1) 0 T2.4-20 (1 of 1) 0 T2.4-21 (1 of 1) 0 T2.4-22 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 T2.4-23 (1 of 15 0 T2.4-24 (1 of 1) 1 T2.4-25 (1 of 1) 1 F2.4-1 thru 2.4-? O F2.4-3 1 F2.4-4 thru 2.4-t 0 F2.4-7 3 F2.4-8 thru 2.4-11 0 F2.4-12 thru 2.4-13 3 F2.4-14 thru 2.4-62 0 F2.4-6.' 1 2.5-i thra 2.5-v 1 2.5 wii thru 2.5-ix 1 2 . 5 -0 0 2.5-1 thru 2.5-18d 1 2.5-19 thru 2.5-20 0 2.5-21 1 2.5-22 thru 2.5-24 0 2.5-25 thru 2.5-34n 1 2.5-35 thru 2.5-39 0

2. 5-4 0 thru 2.5-4 f.a 1 2.5-47 thru 2.5-4) 0 2.5-50 thru 2.5-f2 1 2.5-53 thru 2.5 ~14 0 2.5-75 1 2.5-7 6 thru 2.5- 76c 2 2.5-77 thru 2.5 -104 1 2.5-104a 1 2.5-104b thru L.5-104c 2 2.5-105 thru 2.5-158 0 T2.5-1(1 of SS thru 55 of 55) 0 T2.5-2 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T2.5-3 (1 of a thru 4 of 4) O T2.5-4 (1 of *) 0 T2.5-5(1 of J) 1 ,

T2.5-6 (1 of I) 1 Y3 T2.5-7 (1 of 4 t hru 4 of 4) 1 '. -

T2.5-8 (1 of 1) 1 T2.5-9 (1 of 1) 1 'g s T2.5-10 delete notice 1 ,4 v, Ti.5-11 (1 cf 1) 1 ")-

T2.5-12 (1 ( f 3 thru 3 of 3) 2 T2.5-13 (? of 1) 2 EP2-10

NYSESG ER NEW HAVEN Page, Table p), or Amendment Fiqure (F) Number F2.5-1 thru 2.5-5 0 F2.5-5A thru 2.5-5B 1 F2.5-6 thru 2.5-8 0 F2.5-9 1 F2.5-10 thru 2.5-11 0 F2.5-12 thru 2.5-13A 1 F2.5-14 1 F2.5-15 thru 2.5-48 0 F2.5-49 thru 2.5-62 1 F2.5-63 0 F2.5-64 1 F2.5-65 thru 2.5-66 0 F2.5-67 thr2 2.5-69 2 2.6-1 2 2.6-111 1 2.6-1 thru 2.6-2 0 2.6-3 3 2.6-4 thru 2.6-4a 4 2.6-5 thru 2.6-6 1 2.6-7 thru 2.6-10 2 F2.6-1 thru 2.6-16 0 2.7-i 1 2.7-iii 1 2.7-v 1 2.7-1 thru 2.7-5 0 T2.7-1(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2. /-? (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.7-3 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 F2.7-1 thru 2.7-10 0 2.8-1 1 2.8-111 1 2.8-v 1 2.F-1 thru 2.8-4 0 T2.P-1 (1 of 1) 0 T2.8-2 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T2.8-3 (1 of 1) 0 T2.8-4 (1 of 1) 0 T2.8-5(1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 6 T2.8-6 (1 of 1) 0 T2.8-7 (1 of 1) 0 F2.8-1 thru 2.8-3 0 b b EP2-11

NYSESG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Amendment 4, July 1979)

Page, Table fr) , or Amendment Figure (F) Number 3-1 thru 3iii 0 3-v thru 3-vii 3 3-ix thru 3-xv 4 3.1-1 thru 3.1-2 3 T3.1-1 3 T3.1-2 3 T3.1-3 3 F3.1-1 0 F3.1-2 1 F3.1-3 thru F3.1-3A 1 F3.1-4 0 F3.1-5 thru F3.1-14 0 F3.1-15 thru F3.1-15B 1 3.2-1 thru 3.2-2 0 T3.2-1 (1 of 1) 0 T3.2-2 (1 of 1) 0 T3.2-3 (1 of 1) 0 T3.2-4 (1 of 1) 0 T3.2-5 (1 of 1) 0 F3.2-1 thru 3.2-3 0 3.3-1 thru 3.3-2 0 T3.3-1(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T3.3-2 (1 of 1) 0 F3.3-1 0 Title Page 0 3.4-1 thru 3.4-7 0 T3.4-1(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T3.4-2 (1 of 1) 0 T3.4-3 (1 of 2) 0 T3.4-3 (2 of 2) 0 T3.4-4 (1 of 1) 0 T3.4-5 (1 of 1) 0 T3.4-6 (1 of 1) 0 F3.4-1 thru 3.4-6 0 3.5-1 thru 3.5-10 0 J3.5-1(1 of 1) 0 T3.5-2 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T3.5-3 (1 of 2) 0 T3.5-3 (2 of 2) 1 T3.5-4 (1 of 1) 0 T3.5-5 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T3.5-6 (1 of 1) 0 T3.5-7 (1 or 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T3.5-8 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T3.5-9 (1 of 1) 0 T3.5-10 (1 oi 1) 0 T3.5

1 (1 of 1) 0 F3.5-1 thru 3.5-26 0 3.6-1 thru 3.6-9 3 T3.6-1(1 of 2) 3 T3.6-1 (2 of 2) 0 T3.6-2 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0

@ T3.6-3 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2)

T3.6-4 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 3 0

EPI-)h j 7,}

sa v

NYSESG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqure (F) Number T3.6-5 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T3.6-6(1 ef 1) 3 F3.6-1 thru 3.6-2 0 F3.6-3 3 F3.6-4 0 F3.6-5 3 3.7-1 0 3.7-2 3 T3.7-1 (1 of 1) 3 T3.7-2 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 3 T3.7-3 3 F3.7-1 0 3.8-1 0 3.9-1 thru 3.9-37 0 T3.9-1 (1 of 1) 0 T3.9-2 (1 of 1) 0 T3.9-3 61 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T3.9-4(1 of 1) 0 T3.9-5 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 T3.9-6 (1 or 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T3.9-7 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T3.9-8 (1 of 8 thru 8 of 8) 1 T3.9-9 (1 of 2 and 2 of 2) 0 T3.9-10 (1 of 1) 0 T3.9-11 (1 of 1) 0 F3.9-1 thru 3.9-72 0

.\

'- \

\

b O

EP3-2

NYSESG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Amendment 4, July 1979)

Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqtare (F) Number 4-i thru 4-iv 4 4-v thru 4-vi 3 4 -vii 3 4.1-1 0 4.1-2 0 4.1-2a 1 4.1-3 thru 4.1-6d 3 4.1-7 thru 4.1-10 1 4.1-11 thru 4.1-12 2 4.1-12a 1 4,5-13 0 4.1-17 thru 4.1-18a 4 4.1-19 1 4.1-2 0 thru 4.1-30 0 4.1-31 3 4.1-32 0 4.1-33 thru 4.1-35 1 4.1-36 thru 4.1-38d 3 4.1-39 thru 4.1-61 0 4.1-62 thru 4.1-69 3 T4.1-1 (1 of 1) 3 T4.1-2 (1 of 1) 3 T4.1-3 (1 of 1) 0 T4.1-4 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T4.1-5 (1 of 1) 0 T4.1e6 (1 of 1) 0 T4.1-7 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T4.1-8 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T4.1-9 (1 of 1) 0 T4.1-1011 of 1) 1 T4.1-11(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 1 T4.1-12 (1 of 1) 0 T4.1-13 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T4.1-14 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T4.1-15 (1 of 1) 1 T4.1-16 (1 of 1) 3 F4.1-1 thru F4.1-2 0 F4.1-3 1 F4.1-4 thru F4.1-10 0 F4.1-11 thru F.1-12 1 4.2-1 thru 4.2-30 0 T4.2-1(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T4.2-2 (1 of 3 thru 3 or 3) 0 T4.2-3 (1 of 1) 0 F4.2-1 thru F4.2-5 0 4.3-1 0 4.3-2 1 4.3-3 0 4.4-1 thru 4.4-2 0 T4.4-1(1 of 1) 0 T4.4-2 (1 of 1) 0 g.5-1 thru 4.5-4a 3 g.5-5 thru 4.5-9 1

@ T4.5-1 t i of 1)

T4.5-2 (1 of 2) 0 1

~/i EF '4-1 )J(V 1 j/i 3

NYSESG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqtire (F) Number T4.5-2 (2 of 2) 1 0

T4.5-3 (1 of 1) 4.6-1 0 F4.6-1 O O

9

\

'} \'

J~

O EP4-2

NYSELG ER NEW HAV"N-NUCLEAR LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Amendment 4, July 1979)

Page, Table (T) , or Amendment Fiqure (F) Number Title Page 0 5-i thru 5-iv 3 5-v thru S-ix 0 5-xi thru S-xii 0 5.1- 3 thru 5.1-26 0 5.1-27 thru 5.1-28 3 5.1-29 thru 5.1-34 0 5.1-35 thru 5. t-44a 1 5.1-4 5 thru 5.1-67 0 T5.1-1 (1 of 1) 4 T5.1-2 (1 of 1) 0 TS.1-3(1 of 1) 0 T5.1-4 (1 of 1) 0 TS.1-5 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-6 (1 of 1) 0 TS.1-7 (1 of 1) 0 TS.1-8 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-9 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-10 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-11 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-12 (1 of 6 thru 6 of 6) 0 TS.1-13 (1 of 5 thru 5 of 5) 0 T5.1-14 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 T5.1-15 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-16 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T5.1-17 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-18 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-19 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-20 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-21 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-22 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-23 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 3 TS.1-24 (1 of 1) 0 TS.1-25 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T5.1-26 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 T5.1-27 (1 of 1) 1 TS.1-28 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-29 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T5.1-30 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 T5.1-31 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T5.1-32 (1 of 1) 1 T5.1-33 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 TS.1-34 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-35 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T5.1-36(1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T5.1-37 (1 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 TS.1-38 (1 of 1) 0 TS.1-39 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T5.1-40 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T5.1-41(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T5.1-4 2 (1 of 1) 0 T5.1-43 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T5.1-44 (1 of 8 thru 8 of 8) 0 FS.1-1 thru 5.1-11 0 5.2-1 thru 5.2-3 0 /I ;-

" ' ', O 5.2-4 1 ij .

5.2-5 thru 5.2-16 0 5.2-17 3 EPS-1

NYSESG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR Page, Table fr) , or Amendment Figure (F) Number 5.2-18 0 T5.2-1 (1 of 1) 0 T5.2-2 (1 of 1) 0 T5.2 .T (1 of 1) 0 TS.2-4 (1 of 1) 0 T5.2-5 (1 of 1) 0 T5.2-6 (1 of 1) 0 TS.2-7 (1 of 1) 0 TS.2-B (1 of 1) 0 TS.2-9 (1 of 1) 0 T5.2-10 (1 of 1) 0 TS.2-11 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 1 T5.2-12 (1 of 1) 1 TS.2-13 (1 of 1) 1 T5.2-14 (1 of 1) 1 T5.2-15 (1 of 1) :

TS.2-16 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 1 T5.2-17 (1 of 1) 1 T5.2-13 (1 of 1) 1 T5.2-19(1 of 1) 2 T5.2-20 (1 of 1) 1 T5.2-21 (1 of 1) 1 T5.2-22 (1 of 1) 1 T5.2-23 (1 of 1) 0 T5.2-24 (1 of 1) 1 T5.2-25 (1 of 1) 3 FS.2-1 thru 5.2-3 0 5.3-1 thru 5.3.3 0 55.3-1(1 of 1) 0 F5.3-1 thru 5.3-2 0

5. 4 -1 0 5.5-1 thru 5.5-7 0 5.5-8 thru 5.5- 9 0 5.6-1 thru 5.6-8 0 5.6-9 thru 5.6-10a 1 5.6-11 thru 5.6-32 0 T5.6-1 (1 of 1) 0 T6.6-2 (1 of 1) 0 T5.6-3 (1 of 1) 0 T5.6-4 (1 of 1) 0 T5.6-5 (1 of 1) 1 T5.6-6 (1 of 1) 0 T5.6-7 (1 of 1) 0 FS .6-1 thru 5.6-9 0 5.7-1 thru 5.7-3 0 T5.7-1(1 of 1) 0 5.8-1 thru 5.8-4 0

,]c (3 EPS-2

NYSESG ER NEW !!AVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES (Amendment 4, July 1979)

Page, Table (T) , or Amend:Knt Fiqure (F) Number 8-i thru 8-ii 3 8-iii thru 8-v 0 8.1-1 thru 8.1-13 0 T8.1-1(1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 1 0

T8.1-2 (1 of 1) 0 T8.1-3 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T8.1-4 (1 of 4 thru 4 of 4) 0 T8.1-5 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T8.1-6 (1 of 1) 0 T8.1-7 (1 of 1) 0 T8.1-8 (1 of 1) 0 T8.1-9 (1 of 1) 0 T8.1-10 (1 of 1) 0 TS.",-11(1 of 1)

To.1-12 (1 of 1) 0 T8.1-13 (1 of 1) 0 8.2-1 thru 8.2-4 0 8.2-5 2 8.2-6 0 8.2-7 thru 8.2-Ba 3 8.2-9 thru 8.2-10 0 8.2-11 4

- 8.2-12 thru 8.2-22 0 8.2-23 thru 8.2-24a 2 8.2-25 thru 8.2-32 0 T8.2-1(1 of 3) 2 T8.2-1 (2 of 3 thru 3 of 3) 0 T8.2-2 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T8.2-3 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T8.2-4 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-5 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-6(1 of 1) 0 TS.2-7 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-811 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 0

T8.2-9 (1 of 2 Uhru 2 of 2) 2 T8.2-10 (1 of 2 thru 2 of 2) 0 T8.2-11 (1 of 1)

TS .2-12 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-13 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-14 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-15 (1 of b) 1 T8.2-15 (2 of 6 thru 6 of 6) 0 T8.2-16 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-17 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-18 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-19 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-20 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-21(1 of 1) 0 T8.2-22(1 of 1) 0 T8.2-23 (1 of 1) 0 T8.2-24 (1 of 1) 0

~ (~ /

1 ~

s./ ()

l/y E?8-1

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF TABLES Table Title 2.1-1 Distances from the Release Points to the Restricted Area Boundary 2.1-2 Population of Settlements within 10 Miles of the Site (1970 and 1975/1976 Estimates) 2.1-3 1970 Population and Density, by sector, within 10 Miles of the Site 2.1-4 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, within 10 Miles of the Site, 1991 2.1-5 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, within 10 Miles of the Site, 1993 2.1-6 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, within 10 Miles of the Site, 2000 2.1-7 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, within 10 Miles of the Site, 2010 2.1-8 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, within 10 Miles of the Site, 2020 2.1-9 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, within 10 Miles of the Site, 2030 2.1-10 Age Distribution of the Population within 10 Miles for Station Midlife 2.1-11 1970 and 1976 Population of Cities and Towns of Approximately 50,000 Persons between 10 and 50 Miles of the Site 2.1-12 1970 Population and Population Density, by S ' tor, between 10 and 50 Miles of the Site 2.1-13 1970 Population and Population Density, by Sector, between 10 and 50 Miles of the Site, 1991 2.1-14 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, between 10 and 50 Miles of the site, 1993 2.1-15 Projected Population and Population Density, by sector, between 10 and 50 Miles of the Site, 2000 2.1-16 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, between 13 and 50 Miles of the Site, 2010 , .

'b i Amendment 4 2.1-iii July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd)

Table Title 2.1-17 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, between 10 and 50 Miles of the Site, 2020 2.1-19 Projected Population and Population Density, by Sector, betwt n 10 and 50 Miles of the Site, 2030 2.1-19 Age Distribution of the Pop'11ation between 10 and 50 Miles for Station Midlife 2.1-20 Transient Topulation within 10 Miles of the Site 2.1-21 Summary of Land Use within the Site (Based on LUNR Classification) 2.1-22 Onsite Industrial and Commercial Land Use 2.1-23 Onsite Farms and Production 2.1-23A Potential Agricultural "alue 2.1-24 Assessed Valuation of Onsite Residential Property .

2.1-2aA Residents per House Onsite 2.1-25 Summary of 1973-1977 Property Taxes raid by Onsite Land Owners 2.1-26 Property Taxes Faid by Land Owners at Site, 1973-1977 2.1-27 Summary of Land Use within One Mile of the Site (Based on LUNR Classification) 2.1-28 Farms within 5 Miles of the Siue 2.1-29 Identification and Description of Institutional Facilities within 5 Miles of the Station, 1977 2.1-30 Identification and Description of Recreational Facilities within 5 Miles of the Proposed Site, 1975 2,1-30A Pier and Anchorage huorings within 15 Miles in 1976 2.1-31 Primary Access Routes, Capacities and Volumes 1977; 1989 2.1-32 Institutional Facil :ies within Air Quality Area of Impact,(15q111e Radius) *

\i 1 3 Amendment 4 2.1-iv J'11y 1979

NYSE1G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd)

Table Title 2.1-33 Nearest Offsite Residence, Milk Cow, and Vegetable Garden as Measured from Reactor Centarline, by Sector 2.1-34 Annual Milk Production in Liters within 50 Miles of the Station, by Sector 2.1-35 Annual deat Production in Kilograms within 50 Miles of the Station, by Sector 2.1-36 Annual Truck Farm Production in Kilograms within 50 hiles of the Station, by Sector 2.1-37 Total Field Crops Produced within 50 Miles of the St-tion 2.1-38 Total Harvested Forage Crops Produced within 50 Mt.es of the Station 2.1-29 Grazing Practices within 50 Miles 2.1-40 Grazing Seasons within 50 Miles 2.1-41 Total Commercial Fish Harvested from Lake Ontario by Species, in Kilograms, from the U.S- Side and the Canada Side, Respectively 2.1-42 Sport Fishing Catch by Species on Lake Ontario 2.1-43 Annual Harvest of Game by Species within 50 Miles of Proposed Site, 1976 2.1-44 Identification and Description of Public and Private Water Supply Systems Drawing frcn Lake Ontario within 50 Miles across Vater from the Station Discharge Structure 2.1-45 Public Ground Water Systems 2.1-46 Individual Water Supply Systers 2.1-47 Runoff Predictions of 50- and 100-Year Precipitation 2.1-48 Predictions of Concentration Time and Storage Coefficient h I Ii Amendment 4 2.1-v July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR CHAPTER 2 THE SITE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACES 2.1 GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2.1.1 Site location and Description 2.1.1.1 Scecification of Location The site is in the Town of New Haven, Oswego County, New York, approximately 9 mi east of the City of Oswego and 30 mi north of Syracuse. Figure 2.'-1 shows the general site location. The site is located approximately 2 mi south of Lake Ontario on gently sloping terrain, apprcximately 340 ft above mean sea level (ms1). The site is located within an trea bounded by Mason Road and State Route 104B to the north and northwest, State Route 104 to the south, Tollgate Road to the east, and approximately 1,900 ft east of County Route 6 to the west.

The coordinates of the center of the containment structures z or Unit.: 1 and 7 are:

NYS Coordinate Geographic Zone System-Central Coordinates UTMw Grid Zone Unit 1 43 deg-29'-3" N Lat N4815200m N1269630.00 76 ceg-17'-46" W Long E395200m E576240.00 Unit 2 43 deg-28'-58" N Lat N4815000m N1269139.47 76 deg-17'-41" W Long E395300m E576602.61 M Universal Trans*;erse Mercator 2.1. J . i Site Area The site area map (Figure 2.1-2) is a detailed topographic map showing the identification, location, and orientation of the principal station structures.

This figure also indicates the exclusion area and proposed site boundaries.

All cf the property within the site boundary will be owned by NYSE8G. The area within the site boundary is approximately 1,294 acres. There will be no industrial, recreaticaal, or residential structures, railways, or navigable waterways within the site boundary. Lee Road, passing through the site area, will be owned and controlled by NySE1G.

2.1.1.3 Boundaries for Establishine Effluent Eelease Limits The restricted area coincides with the exclusion are- (Figure 2.1-2) and wil_

be posted and controlled for the purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials. The radiation dose to

" i:

2.1 -I

'ab ' u j-

NYSERG ER NEW HAVtN-NUCLEAR individuals outside of the restricted area will be within the limits defined in 10CFR20 and ICCFR50, Appendix I.

The exclusion area boundary is formed by two half circles drawn from the centerline of each containment, connected by tangent lines. The radius of each half circle is defined as the shortest distance from the centerline of Unit 2 to Route 104 Section 2.1.'.2 discusses the property within this boundary. Pigure 2.1-1 shows the orientation of the restricted area boundary tc the surrounding region, including lakes and rivers.

The only potentially radioactive gaseous effluent release point is the ventilation vent (Figure 2.1-2). Table 2.1-1 gives the distance from the ventilation vent to thc restricted area boundary (as a function of direction) for each unit.

2.1.2 Population and Poorlation Distribution U.S. Census Data from 1970 and projected future populations of sectors defined by distance and direction from the proposed site are presented in the sections and tables that follow. Mileage and radii have been measured from the site center, the midpoint of the line drawn between the two containment structures of the station.

Population projections for all sectors are identified by compass direction and distance from the site. The area within 50 mi was divided by concentric circles to the site at distances of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mi from the site center, and these annular rings were, in turn, divided into 22.5-deg sectors corresponding to the 16 points of the compass and oriented to true north. The geographic relatienship of these sectors to counties, t owr.s .

and villages in the area is shown in Figures 2.1-3 and 2.1-4 The methodologies used to project population growth by sector are discussed in Section 6.1.a.2.1.

2.1.2.1 poculation "ithin 10 Mi of the Site Average population densities within the 10-mi radius surrounding the site are low. The area is principally classified as rural-residential in the state inventory of land uses. In 1970, this area had an eotimated 105 persons per sq mi, atout 28 percent of the average for the state of New Ycrk'2'.

Portions of one city and all or part of nine townships in Oswego County lie within a 10-mi radius of the site: The city of Oswego, the Towns of Albion, Palermo, Hactings, Mexico, New Haven, Parish, Richland, Scriba, and Volney.

Only three of these communities were estimated to have more than 5,000 inhabitants in 1976, which is the most recent population estimate.

'.aese communities included the City of Oswego, which had a population of 21,445, the Town of Hastings with 7,061 residents; and the !m n of Richland, which had 5,847 residents. The largest settlement in Richland is Pulaski, about 10 percent of whose population is within the 10-mi radius. The 1976 population of Pulaski was 2,615. Population concentrations within 10 mi cf the site are shown in Figure 2.1-3 and in Table 2.1-2,",*a, and "b> ,

(

~\

Amendment 4 2.1-2 July 1979 I

k- '.

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR The settlements nearest to the proposed facility are the town center of New Haven, which was estimated to have 402 inhabitants in 1970588, and the Hanlet of Texas, which had an estimated 1970 population of 392'58 The center of New Haven is approximately 0.9 mi vest-southwest of the site; and Texas is located 3 mi northeast. The closest community of more than 500 persons is Mexico.

The covn center of Mexico, which is 4 mi east-southeast of the proposed site, had an estimated 1,555 residents in 1970.

The largest community within 10 mi is the City of Oswego, which is just under 10 mi vest and southwest of the site. About 20 percent of the built-up area of the city falls within the 10-mi radius. The only othar significant settlements within 10 mi, as shown in Table 2.1-2, are the Ville.es of Mexico and Pulaski, as noted above. Both had less than 2,500 people in 1970'">.

The population of the 314 sq mi area within 10 mi of the proposed site is projected to the first year of each unit's commercial operation and to each subsequent census decade through 2030 in Tables 2.1-4 through 2 1-9.

Projected population densities are also shown. About one-quarter of the 314 sq mi is covered by Lake Ontario.

The total 1970 population of the area within 10 mi was 24,397, as shown in Table 2.1-3. The rural and lightly settled character of the area within 10 mi is evidenced by the scattered nature and i ill size of most settlements. Most of these settlements are unincorporated areas, and have less than 200 people.

Their locations can be seen in Table 7.1-3 by noting the higher density sectors. They tend to be east and west, sr northwest of the site. To the south, the land tends to be marshy and lightly settled. To the north is Lake Ontario. A population " corridor" extends from Fulton, 12 mi south-southwest, along the Oswego River north through Minetto to the City of Oswego.

Population densities within 10 mi, as shown in Table 2.1-3, are generally in the 50 to 150 people per sq mi range. Higher concentrations are localized in the scattered, small communities in the area.

Populat and land use projections do not suggest any significant change in existint :tlemenu patterns'55 The 10-mi area is generally outside the econom.c anfluence of Syracuse, a fairly vigorous middle-sized city 30 mi south southeast of the site. The long term population growth rate for all of Oswego County is about 1.5 percent annually'b'. Between 1970 and 1991 the population within a 10-mi radius is projected to increase by about 10,000 people, from 24,397 to 34,225, as shown in Tables 2.1-3 and 2.1-4 This is about a 40 percent increase over the 21 year period. Projected increases to 2030, as shown in Tables 2.1-5 through 2.1-9, are at approximately the same rate, with the total increasing to 56,362.

The age distribution of the population within 10 mi for the years of station mid-life (2011 to 2014, is presented in Table 2.1-10. The age cohorts shown are those used by New York State in projecting population'78 The New York State projections are the basis for the population projections in this document.

Amendment 4 2.1-3 [ f u1 July 1979

.} J ( l, e

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NEZEAR 2.1.2.2 Population Petween 10 and 50 Mi of site The area beyond 10 mi but within 50 mi of the proposed site comprises approximately 7,536 sq mi in New York State and Canada. Eleven counties in the State of New York and three counties in the Province of Ontario, Canada lie wholly or partially inside 50 mi. The area in this range includes all or parts of Cayuga, Cortland, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Ontario, Oswego, Seneca, and Wayne Counties, New York; and parts of Frontenac, Lennnx and Addingt n, nd Prince Edward Counties, Ontario. Abcut one-quarter of the area within 50 mi of the site is occupied by Lake Ontari , to the north, northeast, and northwest. The parts of Canada lying in the 50 mi range are either islands (emherst, 'Jo l f e ) or peninsulas (Picton) in the lake.

The two largest cities in this 7,536 sq mi ar a are the City of Syracuse, approximately 30 mi south-southeast of the site, and the City of Rome, about

4 mi east-southeast. In 1976, Syracuse had a population of 181,105; and Rome had a population of 48,3a3. Both cities are centers of standard metropolitan statistical areas (SMSAs). as defined by the United States Bureau of the Census. The Syracus F.SA includes Oswego, Fidison, and Onondaga Counties, which in pcrt lie within 50 mi of the proposed site. The Utica-Rome SMSA includes oneida County, parts of which are withia the 50-mi radius. In 1976, the population of the Syracuse SMSA was 652,100, an increase of approximately 15,000 since 1970. The Utica-Rome SMSA in 1976 was 332,500, a decline of approximacely 8,0C0 since 1970. Table 2.1-ll'*,"a, and "b > pres ents 1970 and 1976 populations for the two communities of approximately 50,000 persons within 50 mi of the site.

Population projections for Oswego County, which includes the area roughly 20 mi around the site, do not predict any significant changes in existing settisment patterns. The principal areas of population growth within the cou...y are along the Fulton-Minetto-Csvego Corridor, 10 to 12 mi vest and southwest of the site, and along the southern edge of the county in the Townships of Shroeppel and Hastings around the Villages of Phoenix and Central Square, respectively, 15 to 20 mi south and southcast of the site. Central Square and Phoenix are adjacent to the northern suburbs cf Syracuse, and experience population pres 5ures in relation to the continuing growth of the Syracuse SMSA.

Tables 2.1-12 through 2.1-18 give estirated populations and pop.lation densities from 1970 through 2030 for each of 64 sectors in the area between 10 and 50 mi from the site. The population between 10 and 50 mi is expected to grow about 1 percent annually from 819,797 in 1970 to 1,023,299 in the first year of commercial operation, and to 1,289,a99 by 2030.

Table 2.1-19 p ro jects age distributions of the population between 10 and 50 mi from the site for the midpoint of the o p e ra tici.al life of the proposed facility, based on the age cohorts used by the Unv York Economic Development Board. The 1970 age distributions of the 11 counties in the State of New York were similar to those cf the three counties in the Province of Ontario, and in the absence of comparable age cohort distributions for Canada, it was assumed

.-/ (i (:0 'h s,y J July 1979 Amendment 4 2.1-4

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR that this relationship would continua. A discussion of age projection methodologies is in Section 6.1.4.2.

~

b' h '

f Amendment 4 2.1- 4a July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR Private marinas, public launching rarps, and Jummer cottages contribute to the substantial recreational boating in eastern Lake Ontario and Mexico Bay.

Recreational boaters passing by the site may originate from locations beyond the 5-mi radius. Over 230 pier and anchorage moorings are located at marinas within 15 mi of the site and several public launching ramps exist in the area'268 The locations and capacities of pier and anchorage moorings are given in Table 2.1-30A,26 6. In addition, there are boats at many of the over 570 cottages located within 10 mi of the site along the shores of Lake Ontario. The launching area nearest to the site is the privately owned Catfish Creek Marina. An average of 25 small fishing boats are kept there.

The only other harbor in the area is the Mexico Point Harbor, at the mouth of the Little Salmon River, 2.8 mi from the site. Here, the previously mentioned state-maintained launching ramp at Mexico Foint provides public access to the small harbor and to Lake Ontario.

Recreational fishing is popular on Lake Ontario. Fishing activity is described in Section 2.1.3.4.2.

The Leatherstocking Club, a private hunting club, is located 2.75 mi vest of the site center'2. Members hunt primarily for partridge, rabbits, and red squirrel. Hunting of ducks by club members also occurs along Lcke Ontario. A detailed description of hunting in the area is found in Section 2.1.3.5.3.

There are three special wildlife-use areas within 5 mi of the site. They consist of two Onondaga Addobon Society sanctuaries (Noyes Woods and Derby H:. ll ) , and one privately owned waterfowl hunting area (Butterfly Svamp).

The Noyes Woods Sanctuary is located on the east side of Nine Mile Point near the intersection of Nine Mile Point Road and Lake Road. This tract consists of about 50 acres of beech-maple-hemlock forest bordered by abandoned apple orchards and pine plantations <22'.

The Derby Hill Sanctuary is located about one quarter of a mile off the southeast corner of the Lake Ontario shoreline along Sage Creek Road. This strategic point on the Lake Ontario shore has become famous in recent years for the diurnal raptor observations which are made there, particularly during spring migration. When varm southerly winds carry migrating birds to the lake shore, many individual birds funnel eastward past Derby Hill before resuming their northward flight.

Butterfly Swamp is located along the Lake Ontario shoreline to the north of the site. It is currently under private ownership and being leased for hunting cy the Butterfly Swamp Waterfowl Association. It is also being co.-idered by the state as a future wildlife preserve.

Bird witching areas are located at the ends of many roads which lead to the Lake Ontario shoreline. Shore Oaks and Demster Beach are two such areas.

In addition to the recreational activities desc11 bed, three playing fields and/or playgrounds provide local public recreational activities within 5 mi of 3 ..

J ' b' Amendment 4 2.1-17 :p- July 1979 lJ3

NYSE'G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR the site'26'. The nearest of these is the New Haven Town Park, located less than 1 mi west of the site, and described in Section 2.1.3.2.1.4 Hotchkiss Field provides court and field games 4.5 mi cast-southeast of the si.te and a commercial picnic area and playground is found 5 mi northwest at the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station.

Table 2.1-30 lists the recreational facilities within 5 mi of the site.

2.1.3.2.3.9 Transportation Numerous two-1 9 state and country roads are found within 5 mi of the site.

Principal regional Mutes are State Rcute 104, running east-west adjacent to the southern site boundary, State Route 1043, an east-west road adjacent to the northern site boundary, and State Route 3, which passes through the village of Mexico in a north-south direction. Access to communities on the shores of Lake Ontario is provided by spur roads frcm County Route 1, and rarious other county roads cross the area within 5 mi of the site, including County Routes 6 and 29, which are important north-south routes. Table 2.1-31 describes the major roads providing access to the site.

There are no active rail lines within 5 mi of the site <27'. However, there is a linc just outside the 5-mi radius, which, at its closest point, passes 5.75 mi vest of the site. This line runs from the City of Oswego past the Alcan Aluminum, Ltd. facility to the two power-generation facilities located on Lake Ontario at Nine Mile Foint. The line is traveled by 10 freight trains weekly, averaging 20 cars each and is used by Alcan and Nine Mile Foint Nuclear Station. There is also a line about 8 mi east of the site, from Sy; .use to Massena, which carries 32 trains weekly of about 100 cars each.

Another 12 local trains per week with 20 cars each run on this line from Messena as far as Fulaski, which is about 10 mi northeast of the site. At present, no passenger rail service is available in Oswego County.

Shipping channels into and out of the part of Oswego extend due north of that port for 25 mi into Lake Ontario. They do not come closer than 10 mi to the location of the station intake structures. There are no locks and no cormercial docks or anchorages within 5 mi of the site <28'.

No commercial airpor.s, landing strips, or seaplane bases are located within 5 mi of :ne site. The nearest commercial airport, located 10 mi southwest of the site, is the Oswego County airport near Fulton. A private landing strip is located north of State Route 104 on the site; a second strip is located in the Village of Mexico, 3.25 mi east-scutheast of the site center.

2.1.3.2.3.10 Zoninn and Land Use penulatiens Within 5 mi of the site, zoning occurs in both the Town and Village of Mexico.

The Town of New Haven has no zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance of the town of Mexico would not affect the propoced use of the New Haven site but would regulate potential secondary development including residential and ccreercial uses resulting from the construction of the station'. As

,Oh Amendment 4 2.1-18 y3 July 1979

'l C h.

NYSE6G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR discussed in Section 2.1.3.2.2.2, residential uses including mobile homes in Agriculture A Districts and mobile home parks by special permit are permitted

~

bh 7 i,

Amendment 2.1-18a July 1979

NYSEtG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR Grazing practices for cattle and other livestock are shown by sector in Table 2.1-39. The grazing season for cattle and other livestock runs approximately 5 months a year from May to October. Slight variations occur from county to county, as indicated in Table 2.1-40. The average density of pasture grass per square meter for a 50-mi radius around the proposed site is displayed in Table 2.1-38, 2.1.3.4 Fishinz Uithin 50 Mi 2.1.3.4.1 Commercial Fishinn The only commercially fished body of water receiving station discharge from the proposed site is Lake Ontario. The principal fishing area and the chief port of landing, within 50 mi of the station, is Chaumont Bay, lying about 20 mi south-southeast of the source of the St. Lawrence River, and approximately 40 mi north of the site. Primary species landed at Chaumont Bay are bullheads, eels, rock bass, sunfish, and perch. Principal species of the open lake fished. by U.S. fishermen are smelts, yellow and white perch, and eels. Principal species harvested in Canadian waters are perch, carp, bullhead, sunfish, eels, and white perch.

The total catch reported for 1977 on Lake Ontario (Canadian side) was 1,116,085 kg, and 93,957 kg for the United States (on the United States side) for a total of 1,210,042 kg for tne entire lav.e(888 Table 2.1-41 displays the levels of commercial fish harvest for both shores of Lake Ontario from 1974 through 1977. However, official estimates of future harvests have not been made.

The decline in the U.S. catch between 1974 and 1977 can be explained by two factors: a low price level for lake fish in general has resulted in reduced catches of sunfish and white perch in particular. Also, partial restrictions on the taking of eels and on the fishing season for bu11 heads in the Chaumont Bay area account for reductions in catches of these species.

Because of contamination caused by Mirex, a ban was instituted on commercial and recreational fishing of certain species by United States fishermen. The ban was established through a directive issued by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation affecting Sections 11-0305 and 11-0317 of the New York Environmental Conservation Law. The directive specifically affected salmon, trout and other lakefish such as pike, bass, and eels. Since there is no commercial fishery in salmon and trout, the principal commercial fish species affected was eel. The ban on eel has been partially rescinded recently so that eels can be taken commercially for export only.

Other principal commercial species such as smelt, perch, and bullheads were not affected by the ban and are still being fished commercially.

Fishing activity for these latter species is occurring in the vicinity of the Nine Mile Point area and Oswego Harbor. There is also gillnetting activity at Stoney Point and Southwick Beach for yellow perch, and open water trawling for smelt and alewives. There may be an increasc in trawling activity for smelt and herring to make up for the reduction necessitated by the ban on eel. Even 2.1-23 od

NYSE2G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR vith the partial ban in effect, experimental commercial fishing for eels with electro-fishing equipment is occurring and white perch and shite bass are being harvested with power lift netting methods. Less intense commercial fishing is occurring at Henderson Harbor and the touth of Catfish Creek. The current feeling cf fisheries experts is that future catches should stabilize or increase slightly as the fishing ban is rcmoved further<'28 The steady increase in Canadian catches are due to several factors. The salmon s tocking that occurred in 1971 and 1972 produced a harvestable crop by 1975 and 1976. Canadians were allowed to set gillnets for white perch and take unrcstricted incidental catches of salmon. These incidental catches have been quite large. Also, in recent years gillnet sizes for perch have been reduced so that additional amounts of smaller perch can be caught. Therefore an increased tonnage of larger perch has been realized. In addition to these regulatory changes, tne Canadian industry has been heavily subsidized by the government in recent years. As a result, the overall Canadian catch has increased steadily and is expected to remain at relatively high levels in the future.

Still, New York State officials do not characterize Lake Ontario as a significant ccmmercial fishery'338 Discussions with industry experts"' suggest that approximately 50 percent of the commercial catches are censumed in local markets and approximately 10 percent are consumed in nenlocal markets. The remainder is not consumed by humans.

There is no known harvest of seaweed or other aquatric vegetation being conducted in waters affected by the preposed pcuer station's discharge. For a discussion of fish farms or hatcheries, vnich have some affect on t he commercial fishing, refer to Section 2.1.3.4.3.

2.1.3.4.0 Srort richime Statistics on the level of recreational fishing on Lake Ontario frce U.S. and Canadian scurecs are unavailacle because of the vastness of the lake and its m shoreline, the numercus jurisdictions and access points involved, and the vide gf area frce which users of the lake are drawn. McVever, a survey was taken in []j connection with the Rochestcr-Lske Ontario Trcut and Salmen Derby held irril 28 to 31, 1978. It was establishcd that during the 3-day period, approximately ~,641 anglers fished on the lake - 85 percent in boats, No 15 percent on shora. On the peak day of the derby, approximately v3 4,265 fishermen were en the lake in a region from the Tcur Mile Creek area ^7 near the Canadian border to Sandy Creek, which includes approximately 150 milcs of shoreline'3"a> ,

The Coast Guard at the Oswego Station estimated that in 1978 on a spring day gooc for fishing, there would tc approxinately 100 boats out of Oswego Harbor, 300 to 500 cut of "exico Bay, and 300 out of Sodus Foint. In addition, the Coact Guard estimated that in spring and fall, fishing boats comprise O

Amendment - 2.1-24 July 1979

NYSE1G ER NEW HA'JEN-NUCLEAR approximately 70 percent of the ret reation boats on the lake, while in cummer, their share drops to apps,ximately 40 percent (8" 8 Table 2.1-42 presents information on the level of catches attributable to recrc:ticnal fisherten from New York State on Lake Ontario. In 1973, the only year for which data are available, New York sport fishermen landed a total of 1,709,200 kg of fish as shown in Table 2.1-42. To arrive at the estimated figure of 3,418,400 kg of fish for the total lake's recreational catch the New York State total was doubled. This approximation is based on the fact that, although New York has less shoreline than Canada, it has a denser shore.line population, resulting in a larger number of people involved in sport fishing.

Doubling the New Ycrk catch, figures would tend, if anything, to overstate the sport fish catc5 and the arount of food potentially affected by the proposed station.

No efficial projections of future landings exist for this body of water, but three trends suggest increases in future recreational catches. First, fishing is becoming a more popular sport as a result of an incrcased emphasis on leisure tire activities. Second, area population and regional tourism are 356 : ,ov i

Arendnent 4 2.1-24a July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR channel has a trapezoidal cross section and is designed for flow greater than the 100-year flood flow. Approximately the first 1,700 ft to the north of State Route 104 drop quickly to below site grade with a slope averaging approximately 28 ft per 1,000. This section is excavated in bedrock or lined with riprap, where necessary, and has a 20-ft bottom width for the first 1,500 ft, and 2:1 side slopes.

After a 200 ft transition section, the next approximately 2,300 ft tre lined with riprap with a 50-ft bottom width sloping 1.8 ft per 1,000 ft a 5:1 side l slopes. The temainder of the channel, before it rejoins the exis ag stream bed at the northwest corner of the site, is grassed with a 60-ft bottom width and a 5:1 side slope. The bottom slope of this channel segment is 2.7 ft per l 1,000. The channel diversion facilitates the development of the site by removing the source of flooding. There is no net area saved from flooding since the area gained by relocating the stream approximately equals that required for the diversion channel.

Table 2.1-47 gives the 50- and 100-year recurrence interval flood flows.

These were obtained from runoff predictions of 50- and 100-year precipitation events through the use of the HEC-1 computer program'758 The Clark unit hydrograph procedure'768 was used with the time of concentration and storage coefficients presented in Table 2.1-48. These values were obtained using regression equations presented in USGS water supply paper, "Model Hydrographs"t77'. Rainfall amounts were not reduced to account for initia.

loss or infiltration. Unit hydrographs for the Catfish Creek Tributary FE, FW, F, and Butterfly Creek are shown in Figures 2.1-23, -24, -25, and -26, respectively.

The 50- and 100-yr floods produced nearly the same degree of flooding on these streams. Figure 2.1-19 shows the water lovels for the 100 yr flood.

Figures 2.1-20, 2.1-21, and 2.1-22 show the water surface profiles for these streams.

The water levels and water surface profiles were computed by using HEC-2<788 Representative cross-sections for the natural stream portions within the drainage basins were determined from Figures 3.1-1 and 3.1-2 and from USGS topographical maps'7. The Mannings "n" values used in the HEC-2 analysis vete conservatively selected to be 0.06 for the natural stream sections, 0.033 l

for the diverted stream secticns that will be lined with riprap, and 0.1 for those sections of the diverted stream tnat will be seeded with grass.

2.1.4 References for Section 2.1

1. New York State Office of Planning. Point and Area Data Overlays. Land Use and Natural Resources Inventory Project. Albany, NY, 1974

2. U.S. Departmant of Commerce, Bureau of Census. County and City Data Ecok, 1972. Washington, DC, 1973.

3. New York State Department of Transport tion. Planimetric Maps, 2.5 Minute Seties. Albany, NY, 1974 Amendment 3 2.1-31 jhh j {J j June 1979

NYSE&G ER NEW HAVEN-NCCLEAR 4 U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Censu3. 1970 Census of the Population, Number of Inhabitants: New York. Washington, DC, August 1971.

4a. U.S. Sureau of the Census. Current Population Reports Series No. 77-1.

U.S. Goverrment Printing Ofrice. Washington, DC, 1979, p 25.

4b. Central New York Regional Planning and Development Board. Population Projections. Areavide Waste Water Treatment Management Planning Program, November 1976.

4c. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Population Reports Series No. 77-32.

U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC, 1978, p 26.

5. Oswego County Planning Board. Oswego County, 1985 and 2000, Land Use Plan. Pulton, NY, June 1977.

6. New York State Economic Development Board. Official Population Projections for New York Strte Counties. Albany, NY, 1977.

7. Whalen, M. Personal Communication, Statistics / Canada, March 1958.

8. Approximately 25 telephone calls were made to schools and industries to determine place of residence for students - staff and employees.

9. New York State Department of Parks and Recreation. Park Capacities. New York Statewide Outdoor Recreation Plan. Albany, ':Y , January 1977.

10. New York State Department of Parks and Recreation. Forecast of outdoor Recreation in New York State, 1970-1990. Albany, NY, June 1973.

11. U.S. Department of Commerce, Sureau of the Census. Procedural Hiitory.

1970 Census of the Population and Housing. Washington, DC, June 1970.

12. Board and Harrington Realty, Personal Communication, 166 West First St.,

Oswego, NY, April 20, 1978.

13. Hawkings, A. Personal Communication, Director, Oswego County Planning ,

Department. April 1978. y

14. Examination of local tax records, May 1978.

15. New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Crop Reporting M7 Service. Agricultural Statistics, 1976. Albany, NY, July 1977.

[

16 All Onsite Parmers, Personal Cc=munication, May 1978.

17. Rohrbacker, E. Personal Cc=munication, Er.gineer, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, March 16, 1978.

18. Ordinance: " Protection of Construction Areas Susceptible to Plcods," Town of New Haven, NY. July 8, 1975.

Amendment 4 2.1-32 July 1979

NYSEAG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR

19. " Land Use Ordinance" Town of Mexico, NY, May 17, 1976.

20. Robert E. Doyle, Personal Communication, Senior Planner, Oswego County Planning Board, Tulton, NY, March 3: 1978.

21. Harbridge House, Inc., Field Survey, May 2, 1978.

22. Oswego County Planning Soard. Personal Communication, Fulton, NY 1977. i

23. Oswego County Planning Department. Commercial Farmland in Oswego County (Map). Fulton, NY, 197..

24 U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Buread of the Census. Nav York State and County Data. 1974 Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC, April 1978.

25. Steglmeier, Dr. J.J. Personal Communication, Director: Information Center on Education, New York State Department of Education, Albany, NY, 1978.

26. New York State Parks and Recreation Department. Park Capacities. Outdoor Recreation Facilities Inventory. Albany, NY, Se tember 29, 1976.

26a Personal Communication. Proprietor, Dowie Dale Beach Campgrounds, Mexico, NY, July 1979.

27. Hosmer, R.3. Personal Jommunication, Associate Rail Transpo. cation Specialist, Rail Operations Assistance Section, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY, February 6, 1978.

28. Executive Petty Officer Anderson Personal Communication U.S. Coast Guard, Oswego, NY, March 10, 1978.

29. Van Alstyne, R.H. Personal Communication, Supervisor of Enforcement, Division of Milk Control. New York State Eepartment of Agriculture and Markets, March 3, 1978.

30. Mr. Johnson. Personal Communication, Milk Control Commission, Massachusetts Lepartment of Food and Agriculture, Boston, Mass, March 8, 1978.

31. Carr, J. Personal Communication, Great Lakes Liaison Officer, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1977.

32. Creek, C. Personal Communication, New York Department of Environmental Conservarion, Cortland, NY, May 12, 1978.

33. Burton, D. Pers;nal Communication, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Cape Vincent Fisheries Station, May 12, 1978.

34 Jacobs, P. Personal Communication, Board of Drrectors, National Seapal, Inc. (Major Canadian-American Fish Processing Company) May 1978.

Amendment 4 2.1-33 bbb : T

{) J July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HA'iEN-NUCLE AR 34a New York Sea Grant L4 tension Program, The 1978 Rochester Lake Ontsrio Trout end Salnon Derby Angler Survey: A Report and Summary. Prepared in cooperation with the City of Rochester Department e2 Parks and Recreation.

August 15, 1978.

34b U.S. Coast Guard Station, Oswego, New York, Personal Communication, J'ine 20, 19'9.

35. Martin, R. Personal Communication, Sports Fishing Institute, Washington, DC, 1978.

36. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 1976 Ntu York Deer T'.ke by Town and County. Albany, NY, 1976.

37. Schneider, R. Persaani Communication, Provident, Leatherstocking Rod and Gun Club, New Haven, MY, Ma/ 1978.

38. Central N o? York Wattr Quality Management Program, Section 5.26. Oswego County Component, Syracuse, NY, 1978.

39. Correspondence from City of Oswego Water Department, Syracuse, NY, 1978.

40. Correspondence from Metropolitan Water Board of Onondaga County.

Syrr.cuse, NY, 1978.

41. Energy Information Office, Personal Communication, Niagara Mocawk Power Corp., Fulton, FY, March 7, 1978.

42. Summary of Oswego County Uater Supply Report. Boston, Brown, Clyde and Loguidice, Consulting Engineers, North Syracuse, NY, 1967.

43. Onondaga County Compre! ,tve Public Water Supply Study. O'Brien and Gerr, Consulting Enginee Syracuse, NY, 1968. .

44 New York State erartn. t of Health, Bureau of Public Water Saf etyl. _'

Inventory, Community Water Systems with Sources, 1974. Albany, NY, 1974

45. Squires, J.W. Letters to the Editor of January 21, 1875, r; printed in)

"Looking Back...", Mexico Independent, Mexico, NY, October 27, 1976 ar.dl Sovember 3, 1976. b ~)

46. U.S. Department of the Interior, Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service. National Register of Historic Places: Annual Listing of Historic Properties Ulol 43, No. 26, Federal gister, Part III), Washington DC, 2bruary 7, 1978.

47. Historic Site Inventory. St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, 1974.

48. Kwiatkowski, P.C. Personal Communication, Director, Oswego County Historical Society. February 1978.

O Amendment 4 2.1-34 July 1979

NYSERG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR

49. U.S. Department of Com.ne rc e , Bureau of the census. Guide to Local Population Projections Technical Paper Number 23. Washingten, DC.

50. U.S. Department of Ccemerce. Bureau of the Census. Census of Housing, 1970. Washington, DC. Where data for Towns are not available, countywide vacancy rates were applied.

51. Kelleher, W. Personal Communication, Planner, Central New York Regional Planning and Development Board, Syracuse, NY, February 1978.

52. Malcro, C. Personal Commun:. cation, Urban Planner, Department of Comr. unity Development, Syracuse, NY, February 1978.

53. Wallace, H. Fersonal Communication, Fealtor. King, Wallace, and Wilkinson Associates, Oswego, NY, February 1978.

54 Irwin, D. Personal Communication, Irv. Real Estate, Mexico, NY, February 1978.

55. Transient Accommodation Availability calculated Using Vacancy Rates and Average Size Units, as listed in Table 8.2.2-2.

56. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 3ureau of the Census. Urban Division Systems, Inc. Based on 1970 census of the Population, Washington, DC, 1972.

57. N.Y. State Department of Transportation. Planimetric Maps, 7.5 Minute Series. Albany, NY, 1974

58. Cavale, J. Personal Communication, Oswego City School District, November 1977.

59. Telephone Conversation with the Superintendent: Oswego City School District, February 1978.

60. New York State Department of Commerce. Division of Economic Research and Statistics. Albany, NY, February 1978.

61. Individual noted owners in locality, Personal Coccunication, February 1978.

62. Office of the Superintendent, Fersonal Communication, Mexico Central School District, NY.

63. Cooperative Extension Associations, Agricultural Division; New York State Agricultural Agents, NY, 1977-78 (Counties within 50 mi).

64 U.S. Department of Agriculture. Oswegn County Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service, Washlagton, DC.

65. Brown, L. Personal Commurication, Data Information Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Verified bf Ballard, May 15, 1978.

Amendment 4 0.1-35 July 1979

NYSE&G ER NEW HAVi4-NUCLEAR

66. Ridgley, J. Personal Communication, Fisheries Statistician; Commercial Fisheries Branch, Ministry nf Natural Resources, Province of Ontario, Canada, May 16, 1978.

Personal Communication, Area Coordinator: Statistics Branch,

67. Bitmer, H.

U.S. Depart-ent of Commerce, Detroit, Michigan, May 16, 1978.

68. Br:wn, T. 1973 New York State Angler Study, Department of National Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1973.

64 NY State Department of Health. Division of Sanitary Engineering, Albany, NY.

70. Barton, Brown, Clyde, and Loguidice. Report on the Oswego County Water Supply Study. Oswego County Water Agency, Oswego County, NY, 1967.

71. Kantrowitz, I . li . Groucdwater Rescutces in the Eastern Oswego River Basin, New York. New York State Conservation Department Water Resources Ccemission, Basin Planning Report OAB-2, 1970.

72. Crisafalli, L. Personal Communication, Oswego County Health Department, January 1978.

73. Oswego County Planning Board. Central New York Water Quality Management Program. Oswego County Component, Chapter 5, Unpublished, Draft Completed in September 1977.

74. Oswego Country Planning Board. Oswego County Data. Oswego County, NY, 1977.

75. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. HEC-1 Plood Hydrograph Package, Computer 72.3-X6-L2010, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif, Program January 1973.

76. Clark, C.G. Storage and the Unit Hydrograph Trans. American Society of O

Civil Engineers, Vol. 110, 1945, p 1419-1488.

77. Mitchell, U.D. Model Hydrographs, USGS Water Supply Paper 2005, Washington DC, 1972

\C)

78. HEC-2 Water Surface Profiles. Computer Program 723-X6-L202A, United y3 States Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, ,N-)

Calif., November, 1976.

79. U.S. Department of the Interior. Geological Survey Topographic Maps for Texas, Pulaski, New Haven, Mexico, Penne1ville, and Central Square, NY.

O 2.1-36 July 1979 Amendment 4

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR TABLE 2.1-1 DIST AlfCES TPO!! THE RELEAJT-E13IS_ TO THE RESTEICTED APE A &QCfj!C Unit 1 Unit 2 Ventilation Ventilat!cn Vent Vent Directionu ___;ft) ____( f t )

N 2,790 3,.50

!T!iE 2,790 3,050

!!E 2,790 2,320 E!!E 2,880 2,790 E 3,110 2,790 ESE 3,200 2,790 SE 3,390 2,790 SSE 3,380 2,790 5 3,260 2,790 SSU 3,060 7,790 SU 2,820 g,790 USU 2,790 3.380 W 2,790 3,110 UliU 2,790 3,*0) tiU 2,790 3,390 N!!U 2,790 3,320

!iOTE :

M Uith respect to true north Ob /

1 of 1

O 9

e e 7 l l 9 b b 1 n a a y

6os l l

7ie i

i * * *

l 9tt a

a * * * *

u 1aa v

v x 5 * *

J

/lm A 8 A 7 4

5 7 3 5ui 2 3 4,

1 4 6 t t 4 7 pt 9os o 9, o 9, 1 1 6, 8, 0, s 1PE N 1 N 1 2 8 2 5 7 t n

a

t E i T n b I o a S i 2 5 2 5 3 4 0 4 2 h 0t 0 4 9 5 2 3 8 2 4 n E 8, H

7a 9l 4 3 5, 9 6

, 4, 3, 0, i T 1u 1 1 0 2 5 6 0 p 2 0 F o 4 O P

) n SS a EE h LT t I A ne MM ot e RC R

A E

L 2 0 T 1S N

I E

ii tS c

e-ro U

S UN WV N

U S

N E E E E N

E S

S h

r o

m O EU 1 I6 ir ,W .V E S S E E E t G-N . H7 Df W W N E W E N N S i 2 T9 w

&N I1 EE E " / t SV L 5 e 1 YA B S7 e l NH A T9 et m f T N1 gi a o W E aS e

9 9 0 0 6 0 9 5 6 h E MD .

N EN lm 0 0 3 4 8 0 9 4 8 r :

L A T

io Mr 1 o )'

T0 f r l E7 e S9 t 1

n F( e O y o o g

o g

o g o og o go og c b b t g g g, 4 N n e e e e e e e e e e ?)

O I

u o

w s

ws w s v sw ws w s s g

a d

n ,b T C O O O O O O O O l a A l L i ,

U v a P ) 4 O t ) r e e P e ) ) ) e o t t ,

l n e e g ) ) a a 4 m w ) g g a n n n mm a o t e l a ) a l w o o w w o.

i i ,

H T y l l t t 3

( ( l l t l i T T t0 s s 4 t m i i i V ( ( 7 e e s n n n a V C V ( 5 e t e e e H ( ( ( d s y1 5 6 : c n r v v ( i n g t 7 7 S n e e a a o o h k g

a n : in 9 9 E e m l H H s c s s l i S Ci 1 1 C r d t a i e i a h t E R e n t

e w w x e e x ws r l c s T * *

U f e

e e e a u i a O O m S N N T M O P P R H N

S R A O

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR TABLE 2.1-10 AGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION UITHIN 10 MILES FOR STATION MIDLIFE Year __

Age 2011 2012 2013 2014 0-9 6,770 6,788 6,806 6,826 10-19 7,822 7,883 7,944 8,006 20+ 29,856 30,387 30,928 31,478 Total 44,448 45,058 45,678 46,310 SOURCE:

Reference 6

~2 J) E { lOO 1 of 1

NYSESC Ek

~

F S. - *! A'/ E N- 2. J CL E AR TABLE 2.1-11 O

1970 AND 1976 POPULATIOS OF CITIES AND TOWNS OF APPROXIMATELY 50.000 PEPSONS BETUEEN 10 AND 50 MILES OF THE SITE Mileage Direction 1 ?'/ 0 1976

[j tv or Town County # rom Sitq fron Site Egr,ulation Estimates Rome Oneida 44 ESE 50,148 48,343 (Rome - Utica (340,670) (332,500)

SMSA)N Syracuse Onondaga 30 SSE 197,297 181.105 (Syracuse (636,507) (652,100)

SMSA)*

SOURCI References 4, 4a, and 4c NOTE:

kSMSA - Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area 1

l'~h

'V

. \S

'ir r,

y O

Amendment 4 1 of 1 July 1979

NYSE8G ER NE'J HAVEN-NUCLEAR TABLE 2.1-30A EJER AND ANCHOF AGE F0hRINGS UITHIN 15 MILES __Iti 1976 Number of Number of Pier Anchorage Facility Location !!acrines !!c o r ines

1. Lock F Marina Oswego City 1 0

2. Oswego Marina Oswego City 66 0

3. Catfish Creek Marina

New Haven 25 0

e. Davie Daie Beach tiev Haven 68 0

5. Kenny's 20at Livery Richland 0 15

6. Lighthouse Hote. Richland 1 0

7. Freeman's Marina Sandy Creek 10 0

8. Reiter's Marina Sandy Creek 10 0

9. Jones Marina Sandy Creek 36 0

10. Eartlett's Bait Shop Sandy Creek 1 0

11. Greene Point Sandy Creek __0 _1 218 16 NOTES:

1978 data References 9, 26a, ani 61 7cr ., , ;

s ) L$ g ,l I

l l

t Amendment 4 1 of 1 July 1979

NYSE80 ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR S The field investigation located 14 archaeological sites within the limits of construction. A group of six of these sites (Site numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 in the northwest quadrant and Site number 14 in the southwest quadrant of the construction area) consist of modern (less than 50 years old) refuse dumps.

Thesa sites can be dismissed since they are too recent and without sufficient cultural importance to meet the criteria for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places and are of limited archaeological significance.

The remaining eight sites have potential archaeological significance. Two sites (Site numbers 3 and 12) are located within the northwest quadrant. Site number 3 consists of a 19- early 20th century barn foundation and covers an area 53 x 132 ft. Site number 12 is the Rome-Oswego Railroad, completed through New Haven in 1865. The line later became part of the Rome, Watertown, and Oswego Railroad and, still later, part of the New York Central system.

Th9 rail line was abandoned in 1959.

Two sites (Site numbers 10 and 13) are located within the northeast quadrant of the limits of construction. Site number 10, foundations of a 19th century farm, covers an area 200 x 200 ft and includes a barn, toolshed, ice house, milkshed, and house. A modern dump lies just behind the house and covers an area approximately 200 ft in diameter, including parts of the habitation site.

Site number 13 consists of a small refuse scatter covering an area 30 x 37 ft.

The material seems to date to the early 20th century.

The southeast quadrant contains two sites - site numbers 7 and 11.. Site number 7 covers an area approximately 40 x 30 ft and consists cf a scatter of refuse and large stones which suggest the presence of a 19th century house foundation. Site number 11 consists of a house foundation, wells, and refuse area which has dated to the late 19- early 20th century. The site covers an area 200 x 150 ft.

Two sites (Site numbers 8 and 9) fall within the southwest quadrant. Site number 8, a barn and silo f;undation, covars an area approximately 70 x 60 ft.

Both were built in the late 19th century. Site number 9 consists of the foundations o' a late 19- early 20th century farm complex. Included in the complex are a house, granary, ice house, milkshed, and barn.

A fieldstone obelisk found on the site is of undetermined age and significance and was partially destroyed during the 1977 hunting season.

2.6.3 Resourcas within 5 Miles No structures listed on either the National Registry of National Landmarks are located within 5 mi of the site. The nearest property listed as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places is the Gustin-Earle Factory located in a 19th century industrial area, along the Little Salmon River in the Village of Mexico. This factory, located approximately 2 mi cast of the site, manufactured butter dishes, animal polks, pails, and caskets in the 1870's.

This site was excavated prior to construction of a sewage treatment plant and is probably no longer eligible for the National Register.

Amendment 3 2.6-3 June 1979 i

NYSE&G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR One building vaich is included in the state inventory of historic places, at the recommendation of the St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, is the Shepherd-Timbello House in the Town of New Haven. Located on the northeast corner of State Route 104 and Ccunty Route 6, the nause is a large rambling structure with an observation tower built in the latter half of the nineteenth century. It is, however, in a dilapidated condition. At the death of the last Shepherd family owner, the building was sold to a local philanthropist while most of the surrounding property was given to _he State University Foundation Inc. After the closing of a cpecial scLool housed in the structure, the interior furnishings of the building were sold at auction and the house itself is now for sale. Visitors to the location are neg11gible'22 Upon request, town historians identified a few other places of local historical interest including three churches in me Town of Scriba, the , grave site of Silas Tovre (a revolutionary var spy for George Washington) at Mexico Foint, and several residences in the Village of Mexico. All of these places are of uncertain historic value und all would be between 4 and 5 mi from the proposed station. A formal opinion regarding the present condition of, and potential station impacts on, these and other historic places near the

~

site has been requested from the Ne; York State Division of Historic Preservation. A reply from hr. Frederick L. Rath, Deputy Commissi]ner of the New York State Department of Parks and Eecreation, is ey.pected.

2 . 6 . '. Visually Sansitive and Intensive Land Uses - Invantory Visually sensitive and intensive land use areas within a 5-mi radius of the proposed station site are presented in Figure 2.6-1. These areas, include residential concentrations, recreational and conservation areas, historic sites and scenic areas as well as highways and roadways or rail lines through the area. The significant visually sensitive or intensive locations that exist in the area involve permanent and seasonal residences and recreational usage along Lake Ontario. There are no historic sites, national parks, or major public recreational areas and no major highway or rail corridors within 5 mi of the site.

Selkirk Shores State Park is the chief recreational attraction in the area, although it is beyond the 5-mi radius from the station. Another visually }

sensitiv.' location within 5 mi, the Derby Hill Sanctuary, is a bird '

V observation point on the shore of Lake Onta-ic at a distance of 4 mi from the site. Ulevs of the site are possible from the hilltop. Other conservation Ac) areas witnin 5 mi, N$yes " cods and Butterfly Svamp, do not have views to the '

site. The representative photo locations chosen are described below. A ^

limited number of photo locations were identified because of the low residential concentrations and limited number of public facilities within 5 mi.

Selected photo locations frem representative visually sensitive and incensive areas are also shown in Tigure 2.6-1. These photo locations were selected to portray the views generally afforded of the station from various lotations within a 5-mi radius.

Amendment 4 2.6-4 July 1979

NYSE1G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF FIGURES Finure iib 3.1-1 Site Plan 3.1-2 Plant Roads and Pinish Grading Plant Area 3.1-3 Proposed Site Restoration 3.1-3A Proposed Offsite Restoration 3.1-4 Location of Gaseous Release Points 3.1-5 Gaseous Release Elevations 3.1-6 Station Profiles 3.1-7 Site Elevation 3.1-8 Site Elevation 3.1-9 Site Elevation 3.1-10 Site Elevation 3.1-11 Perspective View of Site Area Looking South 3.1-12 Perspective View of Site Area Looking Northwest 3.1-13 Perspective ew of Makeup Water Pumphouse Area Looking SoutF';9st 3.1-14 Aerial Vertical Photograph - Site Area 3.1-15 Construction Site Development 3.1-15A Construction Site Develop,ent, Phase I 3.1-15B Construction Site Development, Phase II 3.2-1 Preliminary Heat Balance Diagram-Turbine Guarantee 3.2-2 Preliminary Heat Balance Diagram-Turbine VWO 3.2-3 Plant Heat kate vs Effective Condenser Back Pressure 3.3-1 Station Water Use .

!b c .

Amendment 4 3-ix July 1979

NYSERG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF FIGU/.ES (Cont'd)

Finure Title 3.4-1 Heat Dissipation System Diagram 3.4-2 General Arrangerent Heat Dissipation Systems 3.4-3 Reactor Plant Service Water 3.4-4 Makeup Uater and Blowdown Lines 3.4-5 Offshore Inlet and Discharge Structures 3.4-6 General Arrangement Makeup Uater Pumphouse 3.5-1 Fuel Fool Cooling System 3.5-2 Fuel Fool Furification System 3.5-3 Fuel Building HVAC 3.5-4 Radioactive Liquid Waste (with Laundry) System 3.5-5 Radioactive Liquid Waste (with Laundry) System 3.5-6 Radioactive Liquid Waste (with Laundry) System 3.5-7 Radioactive Liquid Waste (with Laundry) System 3.5-8 Radioactive Liquid Uaste (with Laundry) System 3.5-9 Radioactive Liquid Uaste (with Laundry) System 3.5-10 Radioactive Liquid Waste (with Laundry) System 3.5-11 Release Faths for Fotentially Radioactive Gases ,

D 3.5-12 Radioactive Gaseous Waste System e >

3.5-13 Radioactive Gaseous Waste System 3.5-14 Radioactive Gaseous Waste System 3.5-15 Radioactive Gaseous Waste System 3.5-16 Radioactive Gaseous Waste System 3.5-17 Radioactive Gaseous Waste System Amendment 4 3-x July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF TIGURES (Cont'd)

Tinvre Title 3.5-18 Radioactive Gaseous Waste System 1.5-19 Reactor Plant Ventilation 3.5-20 Radioactive Solid Waste System 3.5-21 Radioactive Solid Waste System 3.5-22 Radioactive Solid Waste system 3.5-23 Radioactive Solid Waste System 3.5-24 Radioactive Solid Waste System 3.5-25 Radioactive Solid Waste System 3.5-:6 Radioactive Solid Waste System Estimated Quantities 3.6-1 Pretreatment System 3.6-2 Demineralizer System 3.6-3 Schematic Flow Diagram Waste Treatment System 3.6-4 Circulating Water System 3.6-5 Conceptual Normal Roof and Yard Drainage Plan 3.7-1 Sanitary Waste Treatment System Schenatic 3.9-1 Key Map - Transmission Project Area 3.9-: Map 1: Transmission Routes 3.9-3 Map 2: Transniscion Routes 3.9-4 Map 3: Transmission Routes 3.9-5 Map 4: Transmission Routes ,

-) .v f. , ,.

' J 3.9-6 Map 5: Transmission Routes 3.9-7 Map 6: Transmission Rcites h

Amendment 4 3-xi July 1979

NYSERG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OT FIGURES (Cont'd)

Figure Title 3.9-8 Map 7: Transmission Routes 3.9-9 Map 8: Transmission Routes 3.9-10 Map 9: Transmission Routes 3.9-11 Map 10: Transmission Routes 3.9-12 Map 11: Transmission Routes 3.9-13 h., 12: Transmission Routes 3.9-14 Map 13: Transmission Routes 3.9-15 Map 14: Transmission Routes 3.9-16 Map 15: Transmission Routes 3.9-l7 Map 16: Transmission Routes 3.9-18 Map 17: Transmission Routes 3.9-19 Right-of-Way configuration Station 0+00 to Station 15+00 3.9-20 Right-of-Way Configuration Station 15+00 to Station 126+00 3.9-21 Right-of-Way Configuration Station 120+90V to Station 324+20V 3.9-22 Right-of-Way Configuration Station 324+20V to Station 348+50V 3.9-23 Right-of-Way Configuration Station 348+50V to Station 370+50V q

3.9-24 Right-of-Way Configuration Sta'. ion 370+507 to Volney Substation cs s c ';

V 3.9-25 Right-of-Way configuration Station 126+00 to Station 187+00 s

, ')

3.9-26 Right-of-Way Configuration Station 187+00 to Station 3326+50 3 3.9-27 Right-of-Way Configuration Station 3326+50 to Marcy substation 3.9-28 765 kV Single-Circuit Steel Lattice Tower Tangent suspension Structure 3.9-29 345 kV Single-Circuit Steel Lattice Tower Tangent Suspension Structure 3.9-30 345 kV Single-Circuit Wood H-Frame Tangent Suspension Structure O

Amendment 4 3-xii July 1979

NYSE&G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF PIGURES (Cont'd)

Pirure Title 3.9-31 Lateral Audible Noise Profile from Station 0+00 to Station 126+00 3.9-32 Lateral Audible Nnise Profile from Station 120+90V to Station 324+207 3.9-33 Lateral Audible Noise Profile from Station 324+20V to Station 348+50V 3.9-34 Lateral Audible Noise Profile from Station 348+50V to Station 370+50V 3.9-35 Lateral Audible Noise Profile from: 370+5^ to Volney Substation 3.9-36 Lateral Audible Noise Profile from: Station 126+00 to Station 187+00 3.9-37 Lateral Audible Noise Profile from Station 187+00 to Station 3326+50 3.9-38 Lateral Audible Noise Profile frame Station 3326+50 to Marcy Substation 3.9-39 Lateral Radio Influence Profile from: Station 0+00 to Statien 126+00 3.9-40 Lateral Radio Influence Profile from: Station 120+90V to Station 324+207 3.9-41 Lateral Radio Influence Profile from: Station 324+20V to Station 3-8+50V 3.9-42 Lateral Radio Influence Profile from: Station 348+50V to Station 370+50V 3.9-43 Lateral Radio Influence Profile from: Station 370+50V to ?olney substation 3.9-44 Lateral Radio Influence Profile from: Station 126+00 to Station 187+00 3.9-45 Lateral Radio Influence Profile from: Station 187+00 to Station 3326+50 3.9-46 Lateral Radio Influence Profile from: Station 3326+50 to Marcy substation 3.9-47 Ground Level Electric Pield Profile from Station 0+00 to Station 126+00 Amendmer. 4 3-xiii July 1979

NYSE&G ER NEW HAVEN-NUGLEAR LIST OF FIGURES ' Cont'd)

Figure Title 3.9-48 Ground Level Electric Field Profile from Station 120+90V to Station 3:4+ 0V 3.9-49 Ground Level Electric Field Profile from Station 324+20V to Station 348+50V 3.9-50 Ground Level Electric Field Profile from Station 348+50V to Str. tion 370+50V 3.9-51 Ground Level Electric Field Profile from Station 370+50V to Volney Substation 3.9-52 Grcund Level Electric Field Profile from Station 126+00 to Station 187+00 3.9-53 Ground Level Electric Field Profile from Station 187+00 to Station 33:6+50 3.9-34 Ground Level Electric Field Profile from Station 3326+50 to Marcy Substation 3.9-55 Magmtic Field Profile 0 Feet above Ground Level from Station 0+00 to Station 126+00 3.9-56 Magnetic Field Profile 0 Feet above Ground Level from Station 120+90V to Station 3:4+20V 3.9-57 Magnetic Field Profile 0 Feet above Ground Level from Station 3:4+20V to Station 348+50 3.9-58 Magnetic Field Profile 0 Faet above Ground Level from Station 348+50V to Station 370+50V C5 3.9-59 Magnetic Field Profile 0 Feet above Ground Level from Station V 370+50V to Volney Substation

,)

3.9-60 Magnetic Field Profile 0 Feet above Ground Level from Station 3' 126+00 to Station 187+00 3.9-61 Magnetic Field Profile 0 Feet above Ground Level from Station 187+00 to Station 3326+50 3.9-62 Magnetic Field Profile 0 Feet above Ground Level from Station 3326+50 to Marcy substation 9

Amendment 4 3-xiv July 1979

NYSEtG ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR LIST OF FIGURES (Cont'd)

Eieure I_iJ;1g 3.9-63 Magnetic Field Profile 6 Teet above Ground Level from Station 0+00 to Station 126+00 3.9-64 Magnetic Field Profile 6 Feet above Ground Level from Station 1:0+90V to Station 324+20V 3.9-65 Magnetic Field Profile 6 Teet above Ground Level from Station 3:a+207 to Station 24S+50V 3.9-66 Magnetic Field Profile 6 Teet above Ground Level from Station 348+507 to station 370+50 3.9-67 Magnetic Fiela Profile 6 Feet above Ground Level from Station 370+507 to Volney Substation 3.9-68 Magnetic Field Profile 6 Feet above Ground Level from Station 126+00 to Station 187+00 3.9-69 Magnetic Field Profile 6 Teet above Ground Level from Station 187+00 to Station 33:6+50 3.9-70 Magnetic Field Profile 6 Teet above Ground Level frcm Station 33:6+50 to Marcy Substation 3.9-71 Landform legions Crossed by Proposed Route 3.9-72 Genera'. Joil Areas

., n .

JU L , N Amendment 4 3-xv July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 4 ENVIRONMINTAL ETTECTS OF SITE PREPARATION, PLANT CONSTRUCTION, AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION Saction Title Face No.

4.1 SITE FREPAnATION AND PLANT CONSTRUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-1 4.1.1 Construction Activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a.1-1 a.1.1.1 Construction Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-1 4 1.1.2 Building Material Supply Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-1 4.1.1.3 Temcorary and Permanent Roads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-2 4.1.1.4 Rail Access. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-2 4.1.1.5 Service Lines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-2 4.1.1.6 Disposal of Solid and Liquid Wastes. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-2 4.1.1.7 Chemical Spills during Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . a.1-5 4.1.1.8 Excavation and Land Tilling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-5 4.1.1.9 Construction in Adjacent Water Bodies. . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-6 4.1.1.10 Vater Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-6b 4.1.1.11 Precperational Cleaning and Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-6b 4.1.2 Land Use and Environmental Impacts of Site Preparation and Station Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a.1-6c 4.1.2.1 Disruption of Site Area Land Uses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-6c 4.1.2.2 Residential Relocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-9 4.1.2.3 Historic and Archaeclogical Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-10 4.1.2.3,e Historic Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-10 4.1.2.3.2 Archaelogical Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-11 4.1.2.4 Uater Supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-12 a.l.2.5 Recreational Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-12 4.1.2.6 Aerial Navigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-12a 4.1.2.7 Com ercial Water Navigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-13 4.1.2.8 Railroad racilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-13 4.1.2.9 Roadway Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-14 a.l.2.10 Aesthetics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-17 a.l.3 Terrestrial Environtental Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-18 4.1.3.1 Construction Activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-18a a.l.3.2 Acreage Altered. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-18a 4.1.3.3 Impacts en Vegetative Cover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-19 a.1.3.3.1 Removal of Vegetative Cover and Succu;sional Changes . . . a.1-19 4.1.3.3.2 Effects of Changes in Vegetative Composition . . . . . . . 4.1-21 4.1.3.3.3 Effects of Dust, Fumes, and Erosion to Vegetative Cover. . 4.1-22 a.l.3.3.4 Effects of Devatering on Vegetative Cever. . . . . . . . . 4.1-23 4.1.3.3.5 Effects on Endangered and Protected Flora. . . . . . . . . 4.1-23 4.1.3.3.6 Capability of Vegetative Cover to Support Wildlife . . . . 4.1-23 a.l.3.4 Impacts on Faunal Fopulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-24 a l.3.4.1 Population Regulating Facters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-24

^'

Amendment 4 4-1 '

July 1979

NYSE'G ER NEW HAVIN-NUCLEAR TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

Secticn Title Fave No.

4.1.3.4.2 Impacts to Tauna thrcugh Vegetative Disruption . . . . . . 4.1-25 4.1.3.4.3 Impacts on Tauna of Human Activity . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-28 4.1.3.4.4 Alteration of Taunal Movement Patterns . . . . . . . . . 4.1-29 4.1.3.4.5 Effects of Vehicular and Rail Traffic on Wildlife. . . . . 4.1-29 a.l.3.4.6 Effects of Cooling Tower Structures on Birds . . . . . . . 4.1-29 4.1.3.4.7 Effects en Threatened and Endangered Tauna . . . . . . . 4.1-30

.1.3.4.8 Totential Impacts on Blue List Birds . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-30 4.1.3.4.9 Effects on Recreationally Ierortant Species. . . . . . . 4.1-32 4.1.3.5 Restoration, Mitigation, and Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-33

.l.4 Aquatic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *.1-33 4.1.4.1 Aquatic Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-33 4.1.4.1.1 Onsite Uater Bedies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-34 4.1.a.l.l.1 Stream Diversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-34 4.1.4.1.1.2 Site Runoff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-36 4.1.4.1.2 Source and Receiving Uater Bedy. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-39a 4.1.4.2 i'ater Quality Environmental Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-38b

.1.4.2.1 Fffinent Discharge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-38b

%1 4.1.4.2.2 Cons:ruction of Shereline Tacilities and the Intake / Discharge Structures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-38c 4.1.4.2.3 Relocation of onsite Streams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-38c 4.1.5 Noise Envircnmental Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-38d 4.1.5.1 Introductica . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-38d 4.1.5.2 Inpacts from Continuous Onsite Activities. . . . . . . . . . 4.1-39 4.1.5.2.1 Continu]us Onsite Noise Sources and Noise Control Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-39 e.l.5.2.2 Development of Projected Construction Noise Emissions. . . 4.1-39 u.l.5.2.3 Assessment of Noise Impacts f rom Continuous Onsite Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-41 4.1.5.2.3.1 Applicable Noise Regulations and Criteria. . . . . . . . 4.1-42 4.1.5.2.3.2 Hearing Impai: ment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-45 4.1.5.2.3.3 Speech Inte:ference. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-45 s v

.1.5.2.3.4 Sleep Interference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-46 r'V

.1.5.2.3.5 Activity Intarference. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-47 4.1.5.2.3.6 Community Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-47s_

4.1.5.2.3.7 TSC Ucise Impact Definition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 .1 - 5 0' J 4.1.5.3 Impacts from Intermittent and offsite Activities . . . . . .

4.1.5.3.1 Intermittenc and Offsita Sources and Noise Control 4.1-53 Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-52 4.1.5.3.2 Assessment cf Noise Impacts frem Intermittent Onsite Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-53 4.1.5.4 Impacts from Transportation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-54 4.1.5.4.1 Ambient Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-55 4.1.5.4.2 construction Transportation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-56 4.1.5.4.3 Assessment of Noise Impacts fren Offsite Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-56

.1.5.5 Assessment of Total Ccemunity Noise Impacts. . . . . . . . . 4.1-58 Amendment 4 4-11 July 1979

NYSE!C ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) lectiSD Title Page No.

4.1.6 Air Quality and Meteorciogy Construction Irracts . . . . . . . 4.1-59 4.1.6.1 Construction Activities Affecting Air Quality. . . . . . . . 4.1-59 4.1.6.2 Irracts of Construction Activities on Air Quality and Meteorology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-60 4.1.7 Flooding Environmental Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-62 4.1.8 Ground Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-62 a.l.9 References for Section 4.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1-64 4.2 TRANSMISSION FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-1 4.2.1 Access Roads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-1 4.2.2 Clearing and Prettetio:. of n_jacent Resources. . . . . . . . . 4.2-1

.2.2.1 Selective Clearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-1 4.2.2.2 Slash Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-2 4.2.2.3 Herbicides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-3 4.2.3 Construction Precedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-4 a.2.3.1 Transmission Line Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-4 4.2.3.2 Substation Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-4 a.2.3.3 Cleanup and Restoration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-4 4.2.4 Ir. pact of Transmission Line Construction and Site Restoration on the Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-5 a.2.4.1 Ef fects on Physical Teatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-5 4.2.4.1.1 Effects on Topography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *.2-5 4.2.4.1.2 Effecte on Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-6 4.2.4.1.2.1 Sensitive Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-6 a.2.4.1.2.2 Mitigative Measures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-9 4.2.4.1.3 Effects of Hydrology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-10 a.*.4.2 Effects on Biological Teatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-11 4.2.4.2.1 Effects on Vegetation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-11 e.2.4.2.2 Effects on Uetlands and S reams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-13 4 . 2 . 4 . .' . 3 Effects on "ildlife. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-16 e.2.4.3 Effects on Land Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-18 4.2.4.3.1 Effects on Regional Natural, Ssehic, Archaeologic, Historic *, Recitational and Wildlife Management Fites . . . 4.2-18 4.2.4.3.2 Effects on Existing Laad Use . . . . . . ... . . . . 4.2-21 4.2.4.3.3 Effects on Agricultural Lands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-23 4.2.4.3.4 Effects on Troposed Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-24 4.2.4.4 Effects on Visual Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-25 4.2.4.4.1 Effects on the Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e.2-25 4.2.4.4.2 Effects on Vieter Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-25

.2.5 References for Section e.2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2-29

.3 RESOURCES COMMITIED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3-1 4.3.1 Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3-1 4.3.2 Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3-1

-ii JU) ? .

Amendment 4 4-iii e t *> July 1979

NYSE80 ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

Esction Iftle Faze No.

4.3.3 Materials, Building Supplies, and Other Resources. . . . . . 4.3-2 4.4 RADI0 ACTIVITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4-1 4.5 CONSTRUCTICN IMPACT CCNTROL FRCORAM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-1 4.5.1 Mitigative Frograms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-1

.5.1.1 Noise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-1 4.5.1.2 Eresion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-1 4.5.1.3 Dust . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e.5-2 a.5.1.4 Truck Traffic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-3 4.5.1.5 riccding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-3 G.5.1.6 Ground Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-3 4.5.1.7 Air and Water cuality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-3 4.5.1.8 Tish and Wildlife Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-4 4.5.1.9 3rcheological Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-4a 4.5.2 Precautionary Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-5 4.5.2.1 Drainage System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-5 4.5.2.2 Tuels, Lubricants, Cily Wastes and Other Chemical Wastes . . 4.5-5 4.5.:.3 Disposal of Solid and Liquid Wastes. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-5 4.5.3 Landscape Restoratien. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-5 4.5.3.1 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-5 4.5.3.2 Design Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5-6 4.5.3.3 Soils Management and Planting Practices. . . . . . . . . . 4.5-7 4.5.3.4 Froposed Flantings and Vegetative Cover. . . . . . . . . . . 4. 5 -8 4.6 ENGINEEP.ING SCHECULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.6-1 r s V

n iY

\vs 3 .:

O Amendment 4 4-iv July 1979

NYSE8G ER NE'J HAVEN-NUCLEAR Traffic Impacts and Mitivation It is important to recognize that these preliminary traffic analyses identify order-of-magnitude traffic impacts which will have an effect on the area access and commutation patterns based upon an accepted Level "D" Service standard utilized by the New York State Department of Transportation.

On the basis of the projected V/C estimates combining normal growth with workforce average and peak traffic volume it appears likely that there would be significant impacts to area roads from station construction. During the peak periods, lasting for a limited and short duration, roadway segments would be affected by increased congestion and reduced access upon area roads. In most cases, these increases do not exceed acceptable service levels relative to area traffic flows and normal growth conditions. In several cases, however, over-capacity levels are projected which would not have resulted from normal growth alone. These exceeded capacities are in some instances significantly higher than the base level and exceed acceptable area traffic standards.

These peak traffic conditions would occur during the period corresponding to the peak construction season. Thus, while traffic impacts would be greatest during peak periods of construction, they would have the lowest duration.

These construction traffic impacts would overlap with the peak recreational season so that some disruption of area recreational use may occur during the peak construction period.

By comparison, the average workforce traffic levels would have less impact upon local roads. This reduced level of impact upon local roads during a arage conditions reflects the generally more moderate impacts that would result over the course of construction. These average construction traffic conditions would be experienced over a 5-year period.

Measures to improve traffic flows and access could involve alternatives including car pooling, busing, and new traffic regulations such as parking limitation or directional routing.

4.1.2.10 Aesthetics Site construction activities will not be visually compatible with the current rural character of the area. Construction impacts, primarily due to view alterations, will be felt most directly by residents of the hamlet of New Haven. Other area residents who pass by the site may also see the construction activities. However, as discussed in Section 2.1.2.1, population densities in the vicinity of the site are low.

Recreational activities along Lake Ontario would also be subjected to temporary visual disruptions from construction activities associated with intake, discharge, and pumphouse structures. These impacts will occur mostly on land and will be felt for approximately 1 to 2 years, corresponding to the construction schedule for this work, with only minimal impacts of brief 7C/

JO 7: .

Amendment 4 4.1-17 Cij July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR duration along the lake shoreline and on water. The limited recreational facilities and usage within 5 mi are discussed in Section 2.1.3.2.3.8.

The disturbances produced by construction activities will have moderate impacts. The construction activities most visible to area residents and passing motorists at the outset would be those associated with the switchyard along Route 104 During construction, landforms vill be constructed on vest, south, and southeast sides of the switchyard (r' ,ures 3.1-15, 3.1-15a , and 3.1-15b ) . Those on the southeast will be built in Phase I of construction, those on the vest and south in Phase II. The landforms will be plunted with trees as discussed in Section 4.5.3.4. Residents and passing motorists vould also be aware of other construction activity along the site perimerer, notably the spoils area along Route 104 and the parking lot and cement batch plant along Lee Road.

For the major station structures, such as the cooling towers, turbine building, annulus building, and containment, temporary impacts from construction activities vould occur through much cf the 6-year construction period. The greatest impact upon aesthetic values would occur during the scheduled periods of major structural work. This v.ek will be phased for each of the separate Unit 1 and Unit 2 structures throughout the construction period. As completion of this structural work is accomplished, ': pacts would subside, becoming negligible at completion. At the time of peak manloading, much of the work onsite would involve interior finishing, such as pipefitting, not readily perceived by viewers.

To some extent, existing mixed vegetation and natural variations in topography will screen the site from middle- and far ground viewers in all directions.

Mixed deciduous and c niferous trees, averaging 70 ft in height, provide much of this screening year round. Due to the major site structures which are larger than the vegetation and topographic features, disturbance of the site's aesthetic character would still be perceived by persons passing the site and would also be felt by some as far away as Mexico.

Construction impacts vill be most significant for permanent area residents, 9

,[

involving major alterations of their daily perceptions and views of the area, ry and vill be felt for most of the construction period. Travelers in the region would be subject to the same visual disturbances. However, the more transient g

nature of their stay would lessan the magnitude of these impacts. gs In summary, the aesthetic impacts of the plant during site preparation and construction are judged to be moderate due to the temporary nature of these activities, and low population density of the area within a mile of the site, and the limited tecreacional resources and usage in the vicinity of the site.

4.1.3 Terrectrial Enviror ental Iroacts A terrestrial biological community or ecosystem possesses both structural and functional attributes <*>. Structurat characteristics include the composition of the biological community (e.g., species and their numbers), the species' life histories, and the distribution of species populations in time and space.

Amendment 4 4.1-18 July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR Functional attributes include rates of biological energy flow, rates of material or nutrient cycling, and biological regulation. The impact of facility construction on terrestrial ecology is approached on a site specific basis; consequently, impacts on the functional aspects of ecosystems can be addressed only in general terms.

4.1.3.1 Construction Activities During site preparation and facility construction, the terrestrial community will be affected by:

1. Clearing and grubbing

2. Excavation, overburden deposition, and devatering

3. Creation of roads and placement of pipelines, rail spurs, transmission line rights-of-way, and fences 4 Operation of mator vehicles and power generating machinery

5. Human activity associated with site preparation and facility construction activities

6. Construction of cooling towers These activities vill result in ecological impacts on the terrestrial ecology of the site and on the terrestrial communities surrounding the site. These impacts are primarily structural and include:

1. The alteration of existing vegetation, which will cause changes in the vildlife populations onsite and within the terrestrial communities surrounding the site

2. The introduction of open areas and barriers to wildlife movement

3. The potential for bird collision with cooling towers 4 1.3.2 Acreace Altered The site encompasses approximately 1,294 acres. During the construction phase, approximately 476 acres will be altered. The station vill be located in the central to southwest portion of the site (Figure 4.1-3) and most site preparation and construction activities will be conducted in these areas.

Permanent structures and facilities will occupy about 136 acres of this total, leaving 340 acres to be only temporarily , turbed.

7 J (> U'

L!i f*

Amendment 4 4.1-18a July 1979

NYSE8G ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR TABLE 5.1-1 PREDICTED MONTHLY AVERAGE AND EXTREMEw DISCHAFGE TEMPERATUEES. FLO'JS . AND HE AT TE JECTIC'T R ATES FOR TUO UNIT OFERATION AT MAXIMM LOAD Jan. feb. FJ_;_ql A p r il. May June July Aug. Sec. Oct. '!c v . Dec. Av_e m Average discharge temperature ('T) 61.0 61.0 62.0 66.5 72.0 77.0 79.5 79.0 75.0 69.5 64.5 61.0 69.0 Averate rate of heat rejection to Lake Ontario (107 Stu/hr) 16.9 16.9 16.2 15.3 13.9 10.9 7.4 5.2 5.5 6.C 9.6 12.9 11.4 Averige discharge flow (gpn) 14,400 14,400 14,000 12,500 10,900 9,700 9,200 9,500 10,400 11,A00 13,300 14,300 12,000 Extreme discharge temperature (*T) 74.0 73.5 76.5 83.5 87.5 91.0 89.5 59.5 87.5 83.5 81.0 73.5 -

Associatedww rate of heat rejection to Lake Ontario (10' Stu/hr) 23.1 20.2 19.6 17.4 15.3 14.0 14.4 13.5 14.7 15.2 15.4 19.0 -

Associated discharge flov*w (gpm) 11,000 9,700 8,800 7,100 6,300 6,000 5,900 6,0]O 6,300 7,300 7,900 9,600 -

NOTES:

W Based on record high 1-hr vet bulb temperature and associated humidity at Syracuse (period of record, 1955 through 1964) ww Heat rejection rates and discharge flow occurring simultaneously with extreme discharge temperature G

(n C?s

r. 3 Amendment 4 1 of 1 July 1979

triSEIG ER

!!E'T HAVElI-!iUCLEAR TABLE 5.1-2 TPT,DICTED 1:0!!THL'i AVER AGE A!!D EXTRE!!E v TE!irEP ATUEE I!! ELE ASE (or) firt,P THE SU RACE Or LAME 0"TAPIO Jan f_el !!a rc h Anril !!av June Juiv Aun Sen Oct E2V 2f_C Average Conditions:

(Two units - maximum load)

Discharge temperature 61.0 61.0 62.0 66.5 72.0 77.0 79.5 79.0 75.0 69.5 64.5 61.0 Av2 rage lake terperature 37.5 37.5 38.5 42.0 46.5 54.5 63.5 68.0 64.5 58.0 50.0 43.0

!aximum A! near surf ace 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.* 0.5 Dilution near surface 3? 39 38 28 25 23 23 26 27 37 37 39 Extreme Conditions:

(Two units - maximum load)

Discharge temperature 74.0 73.5 76.5 83.5 87.5 91.0 89.5 89.5 87.5 83.5 81.0 73.5

!!inimum lal e temnerature 32.0 32.0 32.0 34.5 39.0 14.5 41.0 44.5 41.0 42.0 42.0 34.0

!!aximum AT near surface 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.7 Dilution near surface 24 23 22 19 18 18 18 18 18 19 20 23 Average Conditions:

(One unit ** - maximum load)

Discharge temperature 61.0 61.0 62.0 66.5 72.0 77.0 79.5 79.0 75.0 69.5 64.5 61.0 Averr.ge late temperature 37.5 37.5 38.5 42.0 46.5 54.5 63.5 68.0 64.5 58.0 50.0 43.0

!!ae.ir.um AT near surface 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 Dilution near surface 25 25 24 22 20 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Extreme Conditions:

(One unitw* - maximum load)

Discharge temperature 74.0 73.5 76.5 83.5 87.5 91.0 89.5 89.5 87.5 83.5 81.0 73.5 111nimum late temperature 32.0 32.0 32.0 34.5 39.0 44.5 41.0 44.5 41.0 42.0 42.0 34.0

!aximum AT near surface 2.2 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.5 2.3 2.2 Dilution near surface 19 19 18. 16 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 - 18 t!OTES:

u Dased on recc4u high 1-hr vet bulb tcmperature and associated relative humidity at Syracuse (period of record, 1955 through 1964)

- Aseuming one unit intate flow rate Jf af 3 1 of 1

I)

NYSEtG ER NEW HA'JEN-NUCLEAR 8.2.2.3 Noise As discussed in Section 4.1.5, continuous noise levels during construction will not interfere with speech and physical activity. Intermittent noises may be higher, but only for short periods of time and vill not exceed the hearing impairment level.

8.2.2.4 Aesthetic Disturbances Construction activities may temporarily disturb some residents and recreationists in the immediate vicinity of the site. Station construction will involve alteration a r.d development of onsite and offsite areas, as discussed in Section 4.1.2, changing the character and visual quality of the land at the site.

I The number of people potentially affected and their locationare addressed in Section 2.6. However, because of the subjective nature of individual pe.ceptions relative to the proposed station, precise quantification of attitudes is not possible.

The aesthetic impacts of the plant during site preparation and construction are judged to be moderate due to the temporary nature of these activities, the low population density of the area within a mile of the site, and the limited recreational resources and usage in the vicinity of the site.

-, , m - , .

3 L; b c<J Amendment 4 8.2-11 July 1979

NYSE1G-ER NEW HAVEN-NUCLEAR 8.2.2.5 Municipal services Summary Area Services The existing municipal services have excess capacities facilities or plans to expand independent of station construction. Therefore, the impact of the plant's construction workforce even during the peak year on municipal services (water, sewerage, and solid waste systems) in Oswego and Onondaga should be insignificant.

The existing water and sewetage systems of every community can support ths population projected for 1989 plus several multiples of the expected inmigrating workforce. The exceptionc are the Village of Phoenix's public sewer system and the municipal water and sover systerms serving the Village of pulaski. The Village of Phoenix is planning expansion to offset expect;d shortages not connected with station construction. The Village of Pulaski nas no expansion plans for either systems, though current use of both exceeds design capacity (Sections 6.2.2.5.1 and 8.2.2.5.2).

Many existing disposal areas are also reaching capacity, and the counties have not yet mcde formalized plans for ?roviding new capacity. Nonetheless, the required regional solid waste disposal capacity must be established, regardless of station constrvction. The laad on this new capacity resulting from the nmigrating workforce will be small, as the increase of solid vaste vill be lest than 0.4 percent of projected 1989 tonnage.

Onsito Services With respect to use of municipal services required by the actual construct. ion, there will be no impact. NYSE&G will provide potable water, sewage disposal, and its evn other services for onsite activities.

8.2.2.5.1 Water Systers The public in Oswego and Onondaga Counties receives water from three basic suppliers. There are two major water sources: an intake from Lake Ontario, and ground water. The major water intake from Lake Ontario supplies water to 's, the City of Oswego which supplies the surrounding water districts in the Towns /' ,

of Minetto, Oswego, and Scriba. The next largest public supplier is the V Onondaga County Water District, which serves several communities in southern Oswego County. The Onondaga water system also obtains its water from the ,\3 Ontario intake. The third major supply comes from ground water. ,s'>

l Generally, suburban and urban areas within Oswego and Onondaga Counties are served by municipal water supply systems, whereas rr sidents obtain their vater from individual ground water sources. Aval data indicates that ground water sources are generally good throughou Oswego and Onondaga Counties. Individual wells are, however, occasionally susceptible to pollution, due to failures in nearby septic tanks and cesspools. This problem is particularly prevalent in mobile home parks.

B.2-12

ML19224D765

Text

Navigation menu

Search