Text

FEMA - Final After Action Report/Improvement Plan for Fermi, Unit 2, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Medical Service and School Evacuation Drills Conducted October 29 and November 29, 2018
	ML19078A213
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	01/28/2018
From:	; US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	Download: ML19078A213 (122)
	v • d • e

Final Medical Service Drills and School Evacuation Interview After Action Report/Improvement Plan Exercise Dates - October 29 and November 29, 2018 Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

-FE-M- -A-

_L::L- --__ *_ - *

Published_January 28, 2018 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview This page is intentionally blank ii FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview CONTENTS CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. iii EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

......................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 1: Drill Overview ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1 EXERCISE DETAILS ............................... :.................................................................... 4 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership ................................................................................ 5 1.3 Participating Organizations .............................................................................................. 6 SECTION 2: Exercise Design Summary ..................................................................................... 7 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design ........................................................................................... 7 2.2 FEMA Core Capabilities and Exercise Objectives ........................................................... 7 SECTION 3: Analysis of Capabilities ....................................................................................... 10 3 .2 Exercise Evaluation .and Results .................................................................................... 11 Table 3.2.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation-MS I Drills and EV-2 Interview.12 3.3 Jurisdictional Summary ofExercise Evaluation Results ................................................. 13 3.3.1 Risk Jurisdiction - ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital, Monroe MI ................. 13 3 .3 .1.1 ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital (Transportation) ............................. 13 3 .3 .1.2 ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital (Medical) ....................................... 13 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdiction-Beaumont Hospital, Trenton, MI ................................. ,........... 14 3 .3 .2.1 Beaumont Hospital (Transportation) .......................................................... 14 3 .3 .2.2 Beaumont Hospital (Medical) .................................................................... 14 3.3.3 Risk Jurisdiction - Gibraltar School, Woodhaven, MI ........................................... 15

3.3.3.1 Gibraltar School (School Evacuation Interview) ........................................ 15 SECTION 4: Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 16 APPENDIX A: Improvement Plan ........................................................................................... 17 APPENDIX B: Exercise Evaluation Team ............................................................................... 19 APPENDIX C: Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................... .20 0 APPENDIX D: Extent-Of-Play Agreements ............................................................................. 22 Evaluation Area 1 - Emergency Operations Management .............................................. 25 Evaluation Area 3 - Protective Action Implementation .................................................. 26 Evaluation Area 6 - Transportation/Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals ...... 27 iii FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview This page is intentionally blank iv FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview EXECUTIVE SUM MARY On October 29 and November 29, 2018, the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (DHS/FEMA) Region V Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program staff evaluated two plume exposure pathway Medical Service Drills (MS-1) and a School Evacuation Interview (EV-2) in the emergency planning zone (EPZ) of the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP).

The FNPP is located approximately six miles northeast of Monroe, Michigan; 30 miles southwest of downtown Detroit, Michigan; and 25 miles northeast of downtown Toledo, Ohio. The 10-mile Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ of the FNPP encompasses part of Monroe and Wayne Counties in Michigan, parts of Lake Erie, and the southern tip of Essex County, (Bay Point) Canada. The major portion of the 10-mile EPZ falls within Monroe County.

The purpose of the MS-1 Drills and the EV-2 interview were to assess the ability of offsite agencies to respond to a medical emergency involving a radiological-contaminated member(s) of the public, as well as how the school responds during a radiological event. The drills and the interview were held in accordance with DHS/FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans. Evaluation drills were conducted for the following locations:

ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital- October 29, 2018

Beaumont Hospital- November 29, 2018

Gibraltar School- November 29, 2018 Officials and representatives from the State of Michigan, the risk counties of Monroe and Wayne, and the licensee participated in this exercise. State and local officials demonstrated knowledge of their emergency response plans and procedures and successfully implemented them. The DHS/FEMA Region V evaluation team identified no Level 1, or Level 2 Findings and one Plan Issue.

The DHS/FEMA wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals who participated in the exercise and made it a success. Approximately 60 individuals participated in the offsite portion of the exercise, of which about one-third were local volunteers. The professionalism and teamwork of the participants was evident throughout all phases of the exercise.

Executive Summary 1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview This page is intentionally blank Executive Summary 2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview SECTION 1: Drill Overview The DHS/FEMA's responsibilities in radiological emergency planning for fixed nuclear facilities include the following:

Taking the lead in offsite emergency planning and in the review and evaluation of Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans (RERPs) and procedures developed by State and local governments;

Determining whether such plans and procedures can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of exercises of the plans and procedures conducted by State and local governments;

Responding to requests by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the NRC and DHS/FEMA dated December 7, 2015 (Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 88, May 9, 2017); and

Coordinating the activities of Federal agencies with responsibilities in the radiological emergency planning process:

o U.S. Department of Agriculture; o U.S. Department of Commerce; o U.S. Department of Energy; o U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; o U.S. Department of the Interior; o U.S. Department of Transportation; o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; o U.S. Food and Drug Administration; and o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Representatives of these agencies serve on the DHS/FEMA Region V Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by DHS/FEMA.

Medical Service Drills were conducted on October 29 and November 29, 2018 to assess the ability of offsite agencies to respond to a medical emergency involving a radiological-contaminated member(s) of the public.

A School Evacuation Interview was held on November 29, 2018 to assess the school's emergency response capabilities.

The MS-1 Drills and School Evacuation Interview were held in accordance with DHS/FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans.

Evaluated drills were conducted in Monroe and Wayne Counties.

Section 1: Drill Overview 3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview The findings presented in this report are based on the evaluations of the Federal evaluation tec1.m, with final determinations made by the DHS/FEMA Region V RAC Chair, and approved by the DHS/FEMA Headquarters.

The criteria utilized in the FEMA evaluation process are contained in:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," November 1980;and

FEMA P-1028 REP Program Manual, dated January 2016.

1.1 EXERCISE DETAILS EXERCISE NAME 2018 Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Out-of-Sequence Medical Service Drills and School Evacuation Interview f?r surrounding risk counties of Monroe and Wayne TYPE OF EXERCISE Medical Service Drills and School Evacuation Interview EXERCISE DATE October 29 and November 29, 2018 LOCATIONS See Appendix D for Extent-Of-Play Agreement Locations SPONSORS Michigan State Police Emergency Management & Homeland Security Division 7150 Harris Drive Dimondale, Michigan 48821 PROGRAM Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program MISSION

Response

SCENARIO TYPE Radiological Emergency Section 1: Drill Overview 4 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview 1.2 EXERCISE PLANNING TEAM LEADERSHIP Sean O'Leary Chair, Regional Assistance Committee Chief, Technological Hazards Branch DHS/FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street

. Chicago, Illinois 60605 312-408-5389 sean.oleary@fema.dhs.gov Dwaine Warren Exercise Director DHS/FEMA Region V Supervisory Team Leader 536 South Clark Street Chicago, Illinois 60605 312-408-5342 dwaine.warren@fema.dhs.gov Katherine Boyce Site Specialist DHS/FEMA Region V 536 S. Clark Street Chicago, Illinois 60605, 312-408-5397 katherine. boyce@fema.dhs.gov Tonya Nobach Radiological Emergency Preparedness Unit Management Michigan State Police Emergency Management & Homeland Security Division 7150 Harris Drive *

Dimondale, Michigan 48821 517-284-3956 nobachT@michigan.gov Section 1:

Drill Overview 5 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview 1.3 PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS

' Agencies and organizations of the followingjurisdictions participated in the exercise:

STATE ORGANIZATIONS Michigan State Police Emergency Management & Homeland Security Division RISK COUNTY ORGANIZATIONS Monroe County Emergency Management Wayne County Emergency Management ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital Beaumont Hospital Gibraltar School PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS Monroe Community Ambulance (MCA)

Huron Valley Ambulance Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant FEDERAL ORGANIZATIONS Federal Emergency Management Agency Section 1: Drill Overview 6 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview SECTION 2: Exercise Design Summary,.

2.1 EXERCISE PURPOSE AND DESIGN The DHS/FEMA administers th.e Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program pursuant ~o the regulations found in Title 44 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) parts 350, 351, and 352. Title 44 CFR Part 350 names 16 planning standards that form the basis for radiological emergency response planning for state, tribal, and local governments impacted by the EPZs established for each nuclear power plant site in the United States. Title 44 CFR Part 350 sets forth the mechanisms for the formal review and approval of state, tribal, and.' local government radiological emergency response plans and procedures by DHS/FEMA. One of the REP Program requirements established by these regulations is the biennial exercise of offsite response capabilities. During these exercises, DHS/FEMA evaluates state, tribal, and local government plans, procedures, and actions to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency at the nuclear plant.

. The DHS/FEMA provides a statement with the transmission of this Draft AAR/IP to the United States NRC that the affected state, tribal, and local plans and preparedness are: (1) adequate to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of the nuclear power facility by providing reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiological emergency; and (2) capable of being implemented. The report and statement are based on the results of this exercise, review of the radiological emergency response plans and procedures, and verification of the periodic requirements set _forth in "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation ofRadiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support ofNuclear Power Plants," November 1980 (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-f, Rev. 1) through the annual letter of certification and staff assistance visits, Formal submission of the radiological emergency response plans for the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant to FEMA Region V by the State of Michigan occurred in May and*June, 2018 for Wayne a:nd Monroe Counties respectively. Formal approval of these RERPs was granted by FEMA on July 10, 2018 for Wayne County and on July 27, 2018 for Monroe County, under 44 CFR 350.

2.2 FEMA*CORE CAPABILITIES AND EXERCISE OBJECTIVES Core Capabilities-based planning allows for exercise planning teams to develop exercise objectives and ..

observe exercise outcomes through a framework of specific action items. Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program methodology, the exercise objectives meet the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program requirements and encompass the emergency preparedness evaluation areas. The critical tasks to be demonstrated were negotiated with the State of Michigan and its risk counties. The Core Capabilities demonstrated during this exercise were:

Operational Coordination: Establish and maintain a unified and coordinated operational J,tructure and process that appropriately integrates all critical stakeholders and supports the execution of Core Capabilities. Mobilize all critical resources and establish command, control, and coordination structures within the affecteµ community, iti other coordinating bodies in surrounding communities, and across the Nation, and maintain as needed throughout the duration of an incident. Enhance and maintain command, control, and coordination structures consistent with the National Incident Management System (NIMS) to meet basic human needs, stabilize the incident, and transition to recovery.

Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 7 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview Environmental Response/Health and Safety: Conduct appropriate measures to ensure the protection of the health and safety of the public and workers, as well as the environment, from all-hazards in support of responder operations and the affected communities. Identify, assess, and mitigate worker health and safety hazards, and disseminate health and safety guidance and resources to response and recovery workers. Minimize public exposure to environmental hazards through assessment of the hazards and implementation of public protective actions. Detect, assess, stabilize, and clean up releases of oil and hazardous materials into the environment, including buildings/structures, and properly manage waste.

Identify, evaluate, and implement measures to prevent and minimize impacts to the environment, natural and cultural resources, and historic properties from all-hazard emergencies and response operations.

Mass Care Services: Provide life-sustaining and human services to the affected population, to include hydration, feeding, sheltering, temporary housing, evacuee support, reunification, and distribution of emergency supplies. Move and deliver resources and capabilities to meet the needs of disaster survivors, including individuals with access and functional needs. Establish, staff, and equip emergency shelters and other temporary housing options (including accessible housing) for the affected population. Move from congregate care to non-congregate care alternatives and provide relocation assistance or interim housing solutions for families unable to return to their pre-disaster homes.

Public Health, Healthcare, and Emergency Medical Services: Provide lifesaving medical treatment via Emergency Medical Services and related operations and avoid additional disease and injury by providing targeted public health, medical and behavioral health support, and products to all affected populations.

Deliver medical countermeasures to exposed populations. Complete triage and initial stabilization of casualties, and begin definitive care for those likely to survive their injuries and illnesses. Return medical surge resources to pre-incident levels, complete health assessments, and identify recovery processes.

Operational Communications: Ensure the capacity for timely communications in support of security, situational awareness, and operations, by any and all means available, among and between affected communities in the impact area and all response forces. Ensure the capacity to communicate with both the emergency response community and the affected populations and establish interoperable voice and data communications between Federal, tribal, state, and local first responders.

The Core Capabilities and their associated Evaluation Criteria selected for demonstration by the jurisdictions establish the assessment objectives for the exercise. These Core Capabilities, when successfully demonstrated, meet the exercise objectives.

The objectives for this exercise were as follows:

Objective 1: Demonstrate the ability to provide direction and control and make protective action decisions through the state emergency operations centers, county emergency operations centers, and field activities by exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Objective 2: Demonstrate the ability to make protective action decisions affecting state and county emergency workers and the public through exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Objective 3: Demonstrate the ability to implement protective actions for state and county emergency workers and the public through exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Objective 4: Demonstrate the ability to activate the prompt alert and notification system utilizing the primary notification system and the emergency alert system through exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 8 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview Objective 5: Demonstrate the ability to monitor, decontaminate, register, and shelter evacuees through exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Objective 6: Demonstrate the ability to provide dose projection and protective action decision making for the plume phase.

Objective 7: Demonstrate the capacity for timely communications in support of security, situational awareness, and operations in accordance with the plan, procedures, and Extent-of-Play Agreement, among and between affected communities in the impact area and all response forces.

Objective 8: Demonstrate the capacity to stabilize critical infrastructure functions, minimize health and safety threats, and efficiently restore and revitalize systems and services to support a viable, resilient community. Demonstrate the capacity to provide transportation (including infrastructure access and accessible transportation services) for response priority objectives, including the evacuation of people and animals, and the delivery of vital response personnel, equipment, and services into the affected areas.

Collectively, these eight objectives successfully demonstrated the Core Capabilities and Evaluation Criteria selected by the jurisdictions in accordance with NUREG-0654/FEM-~P-1 and the REP Program Manual (FEMA P-1028, dated January 2016).

Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 9 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Michigan Medical Evaluation Drills

SECTION 3: Analysis of Capabilities 3.1

SUMMARY

RESULTS OF EXERCISE EVALUATION This section provides a combined assessment of state and local jurisdictions based upon their collective demonstrated performance under the core capabilities associated with the exercise evaluation criteria described in Appendix D Extent-of-Play Agreements. It employs an integration of the Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation Program and REP Program evaluation methodologies - an analytical process used to assess the demonstration of specific capabilities during an exercise. A capability provides a means to perform one or more critical tasks under specified conditions and to specific performance standards. Core capabilities form the foundation of the National Preparedness System. The REP Program evaluation criteria provide the conditions and performance standards for establishing reasonable assurance that State and Local authorities can protect public health and safety in response to a nuclear power plant accident.

An overall summary of demonstrated capabilities is presented in Section 3.2 and Table 3.2.1 of this report. The organizations, locations, and evaluation criteria selected by the State and counties are described in Appendix D Extent-of-Play Agreements, which were approved by DHS/FEMA on October 22, 2018 (Momoe County) and November 1, 2018 (Wayne County).

The results of the assessment are summarized below by Core Capability, as demonstrated during the October 29 and November 29, 2018 drills.

Operational Coordination: Key leadership personnel established and maintained a unified and coordinated operational structure which provided effective and responsive command, direction and control and coordination within and between the affected jurisdictions to meet basic human needs and stabilize the incident. Critical stakeholders were appropriately integrated within the overall decision-making process, which enabled protective action recommendations to be evaluated in an appropriate and timely manner. This process included input from both relevant critical stakeholders and support personnel and took into account the safety and well-being of emergency workers and the general public and protecting property and infrastructure protective action decisions were made without undue delay.

Environmental Response/Health and Safety: Conduct appropriate measures to ensure the protection of the health and safety of the public and workers, as well as the environment, from all-hazards in support of responder operations and the affected communities. Identify, assess, and mitigate worker health and safety hazards, and disseminate health and safety guidance and resources to response and recovery workers. Minimize public exposure to environmental hazards through assessment of the hazards and implementation of public protective actions. Detect, assess, stabilize, and clean up releases of oil and hazardous materials into the environment, including buildings/structures, and properly manage waste.

Identify, evaluate, and implement measures to prevent and minimize impacts to the environment, natural and cultural resources, and historic properties from all-hazard emergencies and response operations.

Critical Transportation: Officials demonstrated the capability to provide infrastructure access and accessible transpo,rtation services for response priority objectives, including the evacuation of people and animals and the delivery of vital response personnel, equipment, and services into the affected areas.

School officials effectively demonstrated the ability to implement protective actions for affected local schools.

Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 10 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview Mass Care Services: Congregate care center staff demonstrated the ability to provide life-sustaining services to affected populations with a focus on family reunification, feeding and sheltering. The American Red Cross, which manages all shelter operations under the REP Program, demonstrated the ability to provide resources, services and accommodations consistent with planning guidelines. They also demonstrated knowledge of the process, and to determine whether evacuees had been monitored for contamination and determined to be acceptable before entering congregate care facilities.

Public Health, Healthcare, and Medical Services: Qualified medical personnel successfully demonstrate the ability to provide targeted public health, medical, and behavioral health support and products to populations that might enter shelters and deliver medical countermeasures to exposed populations.

Operational Communications: Each applicable organization and location demonstrated the capacity for timely communications in support of security, situational awareness, and operations by primary and backup means, the ability to communicate with both the emergency response community and the affected populations, and to establish interoperable communications between Federal, state, and local all response groups and locations and between affected communities in the impact area.

3.2 EXERCISE EVALUATION AND RESULTS This section contains the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the October 29 and November 29, 2018, Medical Evaluation Drills and School Evacuation Interview during out-of-sequence demonstrations and interview.

Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated based on their demonstration of Core Capabilities and their equivalent Radiological Emergency Preparedness Evaluation Criteria, as delineated in the Federal Emergency Management Agency Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Manual dated January 2016. Exercise criteria are listed by number, and the demonstration status of those criteria are indicated using the following terms:

M: Met (no unresolved Level 1 or Level 2 findings were assessed, and there were no unresolved findings from prior exercises)

P: Plan Issue was assessed Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 11 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview Table 3.2.1- Summary of Exercise Evaluation -MS1 Drills and EV-2 Interview i::

DATE: October 29 and November 29, 2018 0

-~

SITE: Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant M:Met Q) o-

~ -~0..

csl t::

i::

0 0 0..

'El

-~

--5

a'2 -0 .E

~

Q)

Oil ti)

LI: Level 1 Finding 0 Q) i:: 0 ~ 0 0 i=

~ ~

L2: Level 2 Finding ~ ~ ::r: , .-. .

~ fl *::C

"' E-< 1:

~ -~ ..c: ......

<.)

r/)

i::

0

~ 0

<.) .._,

i::

P: Plan Issue *-

"O ca i:: ca :.a ca 0 0

s csl%g -~8 ,--,

<.)

.t:: s -~"' 0 0..

~u . ~ ~

ND: Not Demonstrated a a J5 "'>c-;t Q) ti) 0 *-

~

Q) ;::, "O 0 *-

Oil "O Q) ~ 0..

NS: Not Selected 0 ti) "' Q)

~

/:I.< .._, ~~

Q) ~

a:l .._,

Q) a:l .._, a~. e Emetg~l\~y'Op*&ratioris)vf~agement ' '.,{~.;;:, ..., . **,,pi* ,.~* (' " *:,, *. ***;,'<' *J' ', .;..

Mobilization lal Facilities lbl Direction and Control lcl Communications Equipment ldl M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M PrciteclhreA¢tioh ,I)ecisio11iJvlakin$1: ., ' *,t: .. : :;lS, .'.< *,,* ",: .,

EW Exposure Control Decisions 2al PARs 2bl PADs 2b2 PADs for Disabled/Functional Needs 2cl Ingestion PADs 2dl RRR Decisions 2el

.. . **. .\

Pro.teciive_.,&:ction Imoleim,htfltion .. *. ,. '*'*

EW Exposure Control Implementation 3al M M M M M KI Public/Institutionalized 3bl PAD Implementation Disabled/Functional Needs 3cl PAD Implementation Schools 3c2 M T ACP Establishment 3dl Impediments 3d2 Implement Ingestion PADs 3el Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation ofRRR Decisions 3fl

" . ;** .'.0*1' .*' .. tf *.* . .. .. :: :,

0 Ffold Measurement and &ialysis **

.,:,,* :>: I , '

RESERVED 4al Field Team Management 4a2 Field Team Operations 4a3 Field Team Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl

.. ' . .. ,s_;:~ .* . . . .. .,

,Errterget{qy*NottficationJilc:1:~uolic.\.'Info* .. " ._,,*

Initial Alert & Notification Sal RESERVED 5a2 Backup Alert & Notification 5a3 Exception Area Alerting 5a4 Subsequent Information & Instructions 5bl SupporfQnerationsind J<'~dJjties Reception Center Operations 6al EW Monitoring & Decontamination 6bl Congregate Care 6cl Contaminated Injured Transport & Care 6dl p M M M Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 12 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview 3.3 JURISDICTIONAL

SUMMARY

OF EXERCISE EVALUATION RESULTS The following sections present a summary of the exercise pursuant to the Evaluation Criteria and Core Capabilities demonstrated at each jurisdiction's response locations. The sections are organized by Jurisdiction, Location, Evaluation Criterion, and Assessed Core Capability, as discussed in the Appendix D Extent-of-Play Agreements. The results of the assessments are summarized in Table 3.2.1.

3.3.1 Risk Jurisdiction - ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital, Monroe Ml In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for the ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital (Wayne County) is as follows:

MET: All Core Capabilities and Evaluation Criteria identified in the DHS/FEMA-approved extent-of-play agreement.

3 .3 .1.1 ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital (Transportation)

Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3.a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.d. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety 3 .3 .1.2 ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital (Medical)

Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion 1.e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core C_apability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.d. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety

a. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE

b. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE

c. PLAN ISSUES: ONE (SEE APPENDIX A)

Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 13 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED 1 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview

d. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: NONE

e. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdiction - Beaumont Hospital, Trenton, Ml In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for the Beaumont Hospital (Wayne County) is as follows:

MET: All Core Capabilities and Evaluation Criteria identified in the DHS/FEMA-approved extent-of-play agreement.

3.3.2.1 Beaumont Hospital (Transportation)

Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3.a.J - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.d. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety 3.3.2.2 Beaumont Hospital (Medical)

Criterion 1.d.1 - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care S~rvices Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3.a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.d. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety

a. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE

b. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE

c. PLAN ISSUES: NONE

d. PRIORISSUES-RESOLVED: -NONE

e. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: NONE Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities

14 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview 3.3.3 Risk Jurisdiction - Gibraltar School, Woodhaven, Ml In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA evaluated core capabilities and criteria for the Gibraltar School (Wayne County) is as follows:

MET: All Core Capabilities and Evaluation Criteria identified in the DHS/FEMA-approved extent-of-play agreement.

3.3.3.1 Gibraltar School (School Evacuation Interview)

Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 3 .a.2 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety

a. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE

b. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE

c. PLAN ISSUES: NONE

d. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: NONE

e. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: NONE Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 15 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedne~s (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview SECTION 4: Conclusion There were no Level I or Level 2 Findings for Monroe and Wayne Counties. There were no Plan Issues identified for Wayne County. There was one Plan Issue identified for Monroe County.

Based on the results of the exercise, the planning and preparedness for the State of Michigan and affected local jurisdictions provide reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can be taken to protect public health and safety. Therefore, Title 44 CFR Part 350, approval of the offsite radiological emergency response plans and preparedness for the state of Michigan, remains in effect.

Section 4: Conclusion 16 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview APPENDIX A: Improvement Plan This .appendix summarizes the findings from the of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the October 29 and November 29, 2018, Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Out-of-Sequence plume exposure pathway Medical Service Drills (MS-1) and School Evacuation Interview (EV-

2) in the emergency planning zone (EPZ) for the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP).

Plan Issue: '23-18-6d1-P-04 ORO: Monroe County/Promedica Monroe Hosp. CriteriQn: 6.d.1 CONDITION: Monroe County/Promedica Monroe Hospital Public Radiological Emergency Operations Plan (Procedure 4.5b) dated 09/2018 makes several references to obtaining a radiological survey meter to determine the area(s) of patient contamination, where a meter reading of 300 Counts Per Minute (CPM) or greater require decontamination. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) indicated a new guidance had been delivered to the ORO prior to the demonstration date. That guidance changed the 300 CPM to a more conservative survey result of 100 C'. .. ~

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The limited amount of time prior to exercise demonstration to adhere. to the change as directed by MDEQ and, the ORO to make the necessary change or amendment to their procedure followed by adequate training resulted in a misunderstanding as to acceptable survey results.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1; F.2;'H.10; K.5.a, b; Ll, 4.

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Field Monitoring Team Standard Operating Guide, May 29, 2018. Monroe County/Promedica Monroe Hospital Public Radiological Emergency Operations Plan (Procedure 4.5b) dated 09/2018.*

POTENTIAL EFFECT: During the demonstration conducted on Monday, October 29, 2018, conflicting information was briefed regarding the correct CPM standard noted for identifying contamination. Th~ RAD Tech was operating under the hospital procedures that noted a contamination level reading was 300 CPM. This requirement was confirmed in the procedures submitted for approvai and reviewed prior to exercise .initiation. The representative f.r:om the

Department of Environmental Quality informed the REA staff that the newest tolerance level was 100 CPM and subs~quently had the RAD Tech operate with the 100 CPM as the contaminant threshold standard.

RECOMMENDATION: Coordinate and formalize the procedures between the hospital and MDEQ, then conduct the necessary training insuring that staff can adequately perform readings at the correct CPM. ,

Appendix A: Improvement Plan 17 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview Plan Issue: 23-18-6dl-P-04 ORO: Monroe County/Promedica Monroe Hosp. Criterion: 6.d.l SCHEDULE OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: To be completed by next biennial submission of Monroe County/Promedica Monroe Hospital plan update.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION: The FMT Procedure does not provide guidance to hospitals nor does it discuss contamination limits. A more appropriate reference is the May 5, 2018 Nuclear Facilities Emergency Management Plant (NFEMP), Chapter 11 Medical Support. No specific decontamination limit is provided, though REAC/TS methods are recommended. A footnote on the REAC/TS flowchart (Tab C to Chapter 11) indicates that "acceptable levels" are "<2-3x background or no reduction in counts, medical priorities dictate stopping decontamination, health physics consultation warranted."

Consistent with the NFEMP, on the d~y of the exercise the MDEQ representative recommended that the REAC/TS values should be used. However, as several numerical thresholds were present in the hospital's Emergency Operations Plan, county emergency management staff and the MDEQ representative negotiated the use of 100 cpm above background as an agreeable value. All parties involved will be meeting and discussing the plan issue and how to adjust the training and procedures to reflect proper numerical thresholds.

REP ASSESSMENT AREA: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY(S):

Environmental Response/Health and Safety Monroe County EMA, Promedica Hospital and Michigan Department of Environmental Quality CORE CAPABILITY ELEMENT: AGENCYPOC:

Field Team Measurement and Analysis *Michigan Department of Environmental Quality ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

Not later than April 2020.

Appendix A: Improvement Plan 18 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Prepan:dness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview APPENDIX B: Exercise Evaluation Team DRILL DATE: October 29, 2018 SITE: Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant (Monroe County)

Chair, Regional Assistance Committee Sean O'Leary DHS/FEMA Exercise Director Dwaine Warren DHS/FEMA Michigan Site Specialist/Evaluator Katherine Boyce DHS/FEMA Evaluator Don Daniel DHS/FEMA.

DRILL DATE: November 29, 2018 SITE: Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant (Wayne County)

Chair, Regional Assistance Committee Sean O'Leary DHS/FEMA Exercise Director Dwaine Warren DHS/FEMA Michigan Site Specialist/Evaluator Katherine Boyce DHS/FEMA Evaluator James King DHS/FEMA Appendix B: Exercise Evaluation Team 19 FOR.OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview APPENDIX C: Acronyms and Abbreviations f',V'JT,C 'f',0 'F' L'ifi' ~~~, ,r,,1:,r;,,:1fil,; li,i: ',}S'.J1:1~:,;1,,, r ,'.;,,,i~?ii: ;if i}{}~;r~i.ili;,~;fl::'Q~ ,:,...,,. """1 M ~J~~;'i~}11f:f,t~~t~\f1'.;tj~~~I~':}'":?

AAR After Action Report Ag Agricultural ANS Alert and Notification System ARC American Red Cross ARES Amateur Radio Emergency Service B/Up Back-Up CCC Congregate Care Center CEDE Combined Effective Dose Equivalent CFR Code of Federal Regulations cpm counts per minute Cs Cesium DC Dosimetry Coordinator DCL Dosimetry Control Log DCO Dosimetry Control Officer DHS Department of Homeland Security DOE Department of Energy DRD Direct Reading Dosimeter EAL Emergency Action Level EAS Emergency Alert System ECL Emergency Classification Level EDT Eastern Daylight Time EMA Emergency Management Agency EMD Emergency Management Director EMHSD Emergency Management Homeland Security Division EMS Emergency Medical Service EMT Emergency Medical Technician EOC Emergency Operation Center EPZ Emergency Planning Zone EST Eastern Standard Time EW Emergency Worker EWDC Emergency Worker Decontamination Center FBI Federal Bureau oflnvestigation FD Fire Department FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FMTs Field Monitoring Teams g gram(s)

GE General Emergency gpm gallons per minute KI Potassium Iodide Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations 20 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Medical Service Drills & School Interview "lZl',;iit~

, '.'*. "*" ,;:J~'IF't]A ,,, ;y; It£ftf{, ~;;,~, 11:~..1 'l;1*;c-i:,;; *;~ """ . ~,. ".,. ,~ ,',)'~/;~,t;~1;1!ii::~1:m4s:1!it1;J1ii~:

MID Monitoring/Decontamination MARCS Multi-Agency Radio Communications System

µCi/ml micro (10-6) Curies per milliliter mg milligram MHz Megahertz min minute(s)

MPH/mph miles per hour

µR micro (10-6) R/micro Roentgen NRC Nu.clear Regulatory Commission oos Out-of-Sequence ORO Offsite Response Organizations OSLD Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter PAA Protective Action Area PAD Protective Action Decision PAR Protective Action Recommendation PDAFNs Persons with Disabilities and Access/Functional Needs ppm parts per million PRD Permanent Record Dosimeter R Roentgen RA Radiological Advisor RAC Regional Assistance Committee RADEF Radiological Defense RC Reception Center RCM Reception Center Manager RCS Reactor Containment System RDO Radiological Defense Officer rem radiation exposure man REP Radiological Emergency Preparedness RERP Radiological Emergency Response Plan RESA Regional Education Service Agency RIMC Radiological Instrumentation, Maintenance and Calibration RO Radiological Officer SAE Site Area Emergency SEOC State Emergency Operations Center SIP Shelter-in-Place SOG Standard Operating Guideline SOP Standard Operating Procedure TEDE Total Effective Dose Equivalent THD Technological Hazards Division TLD Thermoluminescent Dosimeter UHF Ultra-High Frequency VHF Very High Frequency Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations 21 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan Michigan Evaluation Drills APPENDIX D: Extent-Of-Play Agreements EXTENT OF PLAY AGREEMENT FOR THE MEDICAL SERVICE DRILL October 29, 2018 Location: ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital 718 North Macomb Street Monroe,.Michigan 48.161 Transportation Provider: Monroe Community Ambulance (MCA)

Lead Controller: Shasta Cole MSP/EMHSD/MCA/EMS Controller: Shasta Cole Victim: Provided by ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital MCA: Provided by MCA Staff ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital: Hospital Emergency Department Staff Criteria that can be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator, include the following: For Transportation: l.d.l, 3.a.l and 6.d.l; for the Hospital, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l and 6.d.l. Criteria may be re-demonstrated, as agreed by the MSP/EMHSD Controller and FEMA Evaluator(s).

EVALUATION AREA 1 - EMERGENCY OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Criterion 1.d.1: At least two communication systems are available, at least one operates properly, and communication links are established and maintained with appropriate locations. Communications capabilities are managed in support of emergency operations.

Monroe Community Ambulance will use 2-way radios to communicate with ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital. Other communication systems that can be used include commercial telephone or cell phones.

Appendix D: Extent-Of-Play Agreements 22 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED RadiologiGal Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan Michigan Evaluation Drills Criterion 1.e.1: Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, potassium iodide (Kl) and other supplies are suffi'cient to support emergency operations.

ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital will adequately demonstrate the ability to support operations, with adequate resources. The availability of dosimetry and Kl for hospital personnel will be demonstrated during this exercise, Monroe Community Ambulance staff will also be issued dosimetry and Kl as field team members.

EVALUATION AREA 3 ~ PROTECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION Criterion 3.a.1: The OR Os issue appropriate dosimetry and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plan and

procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart.

The- use of dosimetry and Kl will be demonstrated by ambulance crew. For the purpose of this drill the ambulance Monroe County will simulate issuing dosimetry and Kl to the ambulance crew in lieu of the emergency worker decontamination center.

For purposes of this exercise, if there is no medical need to bring equipment into and out of the treatment room, swabs will be taken at the injury locations and passed out of the room to demonstrate movement of equipment and supplies into and out of the controlled *area.

EVALUATION AREA 6.d -TRANSPORTATION AND TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED INJURED INDIVIDUALS Criterion 6.d.1: The facility/ORO has the appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination, and medical services to contaminated injured individuals. ,

The hospital will demonstrate procedures .for limiting exposure to hospital staff, decontaminating a patient, and restricting access to the area where the patient is being treated and monitored.

Monroe Community Ambulance will demonstrate the capability to transport a contaminated, injured individual to ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital. The ambulance crew will pick up a contaminated injured patient at Monroe Community Ambulance (simulated location of accident). Monroe Community Ambulance staff will utilize universal precautions and good housekeeping practices to minimize the spread of contamination focusing on treating the patient's medical condition.

Monroe Community Ambulance will call in the information regarding the patient to ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital so they can prepare for receipt of a contaminated patient.

Appendix D: Extent-Of-Play Agreements 23 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan Michigan Evaluation Drills ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital will implement their plan for receipt, isolation and treatment of an injured contaminated patient. Two-hospital staff members will demonstrate proper donning and doffing of full personal protective equipment (PPE).

Upon completion of this portion of demonstration PPE requirements may be relaxed

with the concurrence of the lead controller and FEMA evaluator. Medical personnel will utilize universal precautions and good housekeeping practices to minimize the spread of contamination, and will focus on treating the patient's medical condition.

Simple decontamination efforts will be demonstrated after the patient has been medically stabilized. Hospital personnel will demonstrate their knowledge of who to call for assistance in Radiological Accidents (e.g., REAC/TS).

The drill will conclude with hospital representatives demonstrating the removal of protective clothing and surveying of the emergency room and hospital personnel.

Termination will be at the discretion of the Lead Controller, MSP/EMHSD Controller and FEMA Evaluator(s) based on successful demonstration of objectives.

Appendix D: Extent-Of-Play Agreements 24 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan Michigan Evaluation Drills EXTENT OF PLAY AGREEMENT FOR THE MEDICAL SERVICE DRILL SCHOOL EVACUATION INTERVIEW November 29, 2018 Locations: Beaumont Hospital 5450 Fort Street Trenton, Michigan. 48183 Gibraltar School 19370 Vreeland Road Woodhaven, Michigan 48183 Transportation Provider: Huron Valley Ambulance (H;VA)

Lead Controller: Shasta Cole MSP/EMHSD/HVA/EMS Controller: Michigan State Police Medical Controller: Shasta Cole Victim:* Provided by Beaumont Hospital HVA:. HVASTAFF Beaumont Hospital: Emergency Department Staff Criteria that can be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator, include the following: For Transportation: l.d.1, 3.a.l and 6.d.1; for the Hospital, l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l and 6.d.1; for the School, l.d.1, l.e.1, 3.a.1,.3.c.2. Criteria may be re-demonstrated, as agreed by the Lead Controller, MSP/EMHSD Controller and FEMA Evaluator(s).

Evaluation Area 1 - Emergency Operations Management Criterion 1.d.1: At least two communication systems are available, at least one operates properly, and communication links are established and maintained with appropriate locations.

Communications capabilities are managed in support of emergency operations.

Appendix D: Extent-Of-Play Agreements 25 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan Michigan Evaluation Drills

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the EOC, JIC, Emergency Worker Decontamination Center, and Access Control. If both the primary and back-up systems fail, this objective may be demonstrated by successful use of an alternate method of communication.

a. The ambulance will use 2-way radios to communicate with the hospital.

Other communication systems that can be used include commercial telephone or cell phones. ,

b. The buses will use 2-way radios to communicate with the school. Other communication systems that can be used include commercial telephone or cell phones.

Criterion 1.e.1: Equipment, maps, displays monitoring instruments, dosimetry, potassium iodide (Kl), and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations.

1. The hospital will adequately demonstrate the ability to support operations, with adequate resources. The availability of dosimetry and Kl for hospital personnel will be demonstrated during this exercise, ambulance staff will also be issued dosimetry and Kl as field team members.

2. The school will adequately demonstrate the ability to support operations, with adequate resources. The avaiiability of dosimetry and Kl for bus driver personnel will be issued Kl as emergency worker members.

Evaluation Area 3 - Protective Action Implementation Criterion 3.a.1: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, Kl, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plan and procedures.

Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of Kl for emergency workers is maintained. _

1. The use of dosimetry and Kl will be demonstrated. For the purpose of this drill the county will simulate issuing dosimetry and Kl in lieu of the emergency worker decontamination center.

a. Dosimetry and Kl will be issued to the hospital staff in the REA.

b. Dosimetry and Kl will be issued to the ambulance crew.

c. Dosimetry and Kl will be issued to the bus drivers.

2. For purposes of this exercise, if there is no medical need to bring equipment into and out of the treatment room, swabs will be taken at the injury locations and passed out of the room to demonstrate movement of equipment and supplies into and out of the controlled area.

Criterion 3.c.2: OROs/School officials implement protective actions for schools. *

1. An EV-2 interview will be conducted at Gibralter School.

Appendix D: Extent-Of-Play Agreements 26 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan Michigan Evaluation Drills Evaluation Area 6 - Transportation and Treatment of Contaminated Injured Individuals Criterion 6.d.1: The facility/ORO has the appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination, and medical services to contaminated injured individuals.

The hospital will demonstrate procedures for limiting exposure to hospital staff, decontaminating a patient, and restricting access to the area where the patient is being treated and monitored.

The ambulance crew will demonstrate the capability to transport a contaminated, injured individual to the Hospital. The ambulance crew will pick up a contaminated injured patient at a predetermined location (simulated location of accident). The ambulance crew will utilize ur1iversal precautions and good housekeeping*practices to minimize the spread of contamination focusing on treating the patient's medical condition.

The ambulance crew will call in the information regarding the patient to the hospital so they can prepare for receipt of a contaminated patif,mt. * -*

The hospital will implement their plan for receipt, isolation and treatment of an injured contaminated patient. Two hospital staff members will demonstrate proper donning and doffing of full personal protective equipment (PPE). Upori completion of this portion of

demonstration PPE requirements may be relaxed with the concurrence of the lead controller and FEMA evaluator. Medical personnel will utilize universal precautions and good

housekeeping practices to minimize the spread of contamination and will focus on treati11g the patient's medical condition. Simple decontamination efforts will be demonstrated after the patient has been medically stabilized. Hospital personnel will demonstrate their knowledge of who to call for assistance in Radiological Accidents (e.g., REAC/TS).

The drill will conclude with hospital representatives demonstrating the removal of protective clothing and surveying of the emergency room and hospital personnel. Termination will be_

at the discretion of the Lead Controller, MSP/EMHSD Controller and FEMA Evaluator(s) based on successful demonstration pf objectives.

Following the conclusion of the drill, a short critique will be held.

Appendix D: Extent-Of-Play Agreements 27

' FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

U.S. Department or Homeland Security Region V 5~!'i South qark Street, Floor 7 Chicago, Illinois 60605 FEMA Emmitt iMcGo.wan.

Deputy State Director,of Emergenpy :Mam1gement/Homeland Security Michigan: State Police

Emergency Managem ent Md Homelan d Security Division P;O. Box 30634 La.nsing;, MI 48909

Dear Captain McGowan:

Enclosed is the Final After-Action Report/Improvement Pian (AARIIP) for the Fermi 2 Nuclear

~ower Plant, Radiological Emergency Prepatednes$; Full Participation Piume Exposure Pathway

~er¢js_e .con4ucted on Tuesday, August 28, 2018. Additfort~lly, one copy of the Final .AAR/JP

will be provided eiectroriically: * *

The e~ercise resulted 'in no Level 1 Findings. There was one preyioµs Level 2 Finding for the County of:M:ottroe that was sµccessfully demonstrated. There were three _Level 4]~indings, two fqr the State of Michigan and one for the County ofMonroe, which were successfully re.:

demortstrateQ 4uring the exercise. There were three Plan Issues identified for the State of Michigan. Please s.ee the report for further details.

B~se4 on the results of the exerdse, the planning and preparedness for both the State of Michigan and the. aff~cted local jurisdictjons continue to provide teasom1ble ~ssurance that appropriate measures cart pe t~en to protect the public health and safety. Therefore, Tide 44 CFR 350 approval of the offsite rac:ljqlqgical emergency response plans and preparedness program remain -~ effect. * * ,

If you have any questions, please contact SeaI1 O'Leary, Chair, Regional Assistance Committee, at (312) 408 ..~389~ * *

$incerely,

-~~-~

~ e s 'I(. Joseph , . ,

Regional ,Administrator Enclosure cc: DHS/FEMA Headquarters NRCReg iqnill NRC Headquarters Document *Control Desk www.fema.gov

Final After Action Report/

Improvement Plan Exercise Date - August 28, 2018 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Published November 28, 2018 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant This page is intentionally blank ii FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan

Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. iii EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

..................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 1: Exercise Overview ............................................................................................................ 3 1.1 EXERCISE DETAILS ................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership ............................................................................................ 5 1.3 Participating Organizations ........................................................................................................... 7 SECTION 2: Exercise Design Su1nn1ary .................................................................................................. 9.

2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design ........................................., .. : .......................................................... 9 2.2 FEMA Core Capabilities and Exercise Objectives ....................................................................... 9 SECTION 3: Analysis of Capabilities .................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation ................................................................................... 13 3 .2 Exercise Evaluation and Results ................................................................................................ 15 Table 3 .2.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation - ............................................................... .

State of Michigan/Joint Information Center Operations .............................. 17 Table 3.2.2- Summary of Exercise Evaluation- ............................................................... .

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality ........................................ 18 Table 3.2.3 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation- Monroe County .................................... 19 Table 3.2.4 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation- ................................................................ .

Monroe County Out-of-Sequence Activities .............................................. 20 Table 3.2.5 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation- Wayne County ...................................... 21 3.3 Jurisdictional Summary of Exercise Evaluation Results ............................................................. 23 3.3.1 State of Michigan ............................................................................................... :............. 23 3 .3 .1.1 State of Michigan - Initial Notification Point ....................................................... 23 3.3.1.2 State of Michigan - State Emergency Operations Center ....... :.............................. 23 3.3.1.3 Incident Management Group ................................................................................ 24 3 .3 .1.4 Field Team Center - MSP Monroe Post ............................................................... 25 3.3.1.5 Field Team I - MSP Monroe Post ........................................................................ 26 3.3.1.6 Field Team 2-MSP Monroe Post ........................................................................ 26 3.3.1.7 Joint Information Center ...................................................................................... 26 3.3.1.8 State Liaison - Monroe County Emergency Operations Center ............................. 27 3.3.1.9 State Liaison - Wayne County Emergency Operations Center .............................. 27 3.3.1.10 MDEQ FTC Emergency Worker Equipment/

Vehicle Monitoring/Decontamination - MSP Monroe Post... ............................... 28 iii FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant 3 .3 .1.11 MDEQ FTC Emergency Worker Monitoring/

Decontamination - MSP Monroe Post ............................................................... 28 3 .3 .1.12 MDEQ Representative - Emergency Worker Equipment/

Vehicle Monitoring/Decontamination - Brownstown F .S. #4 .............................. 28 3 .3 .1.13 MDEQ Representative - Emergency Worker Monitoring/

Decontamination - Brownstown F .S. #4 .............................................................. 29 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdiction - Monroe County .................................................................................... 29 3.3.2.1 Initial Notification Point ....................................................................................... 30 3.3.2.2 Monroe County Emergency Operations Center. ........... :........................................ 30 3 .3 .2.3 Monroe County Rep at the Joint Information Center ............................................. 31 3.3.2.4 MCEM Public Hotline Rumor Control ................................................................. 32 3.3.2.5 TACP Dosimetry Brief .... ;................................................................................. 32 3.3.2.6 Traffic and Access Control Point Demonstration ............................................... 33 3.3.2.7 Dosimetry/Sodium Iodide Stocks - Monroe County Health Department............. 33 3.3.3 Risk Jurisdiction - Monroe County, Out-of-Sequence ....................................................... 34 3.3.3.1 EV-2 School Interview ......................................................................................... 34 3.3.3.2 Public Reception/Decontamination/Congregate Care Center - Summerfield High

School. ................................................................................................................ 34 3.3.3.3 MDEQ Representative - Summerfield High School ............................................. 35 3.3.3.4 Public Reception/Decontamination/Congregate Care Center - Mason High School

.......................................................................................................................... 35 3.3.3.5 MDEQ Representative-Mason High School ....................................................... 35 3.3.4 Host Jurisdiction....: Wayne County .................................................................................... 36 3.3.4.1 Initial Notification Point ....................................................................................... 36 3.3.4.2 Wayne County Emergency Operations Center ...................................................... 36 3.3.4.3 Wayne County Representative at Joint Information Center ................................... 38 3.3.4.4 Traffic and Access Control Point Demonstration-Brownstown F.S. #4 ............... 39 3.3.4.5 Emergency Worker Equipment/Vehicle Monitoring/Decontamination -

Brownstown F .S. #4 .......................................................................................... 39 3 .3 .4.6 Emergency Worker Monitor/Decontamination - Brownstown F. S. #4 .................. 3 9 SECTION 4: Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 41 APPENDIX A: Improvement Plan ........................................................................................................ 43 APPENDIX B: Exercise Tilneline ........................................................................................................ 57 APPENDIX C: Exercise Evaluation Team ............................................................................................ 59 APPENDIX D: Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................... :................... 61 APPENDIX E: Extent-of-Play Agreements ........................................................................................... 65 APPENDIX F: On-Site/Off-Site Scenario ............................................ ,................................................ 81 iv FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

On August 28, 2018, the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region V Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program staff evaluated a plume exposure pathway exercise in the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) for the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP).

The FNPP is located approximately six miles northeast of Monroe, Michigan; 30 miles southwest of downtown Detroit, Michigan; and 25 miles nort,heast of downtown Toledo, Ohio. The 10-mile Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ of the FNPP encompasses part of Monroe and Wayne Counties in Michigan, parts of Lake Erie, and the southern tip of Essex County, (Bay Point) Canada. The major portion of the 10-mile EPZ falls within Monroe County.

The purpose of the exercise was to assess the level of state and local preparedness in responding tb an incident at FNPP. This exercise was conducted in accordance with FEJYIA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans and procedures. The previous federally-evaluated exercise at this site was conducted on August 9, 2016. The qualifying emergency preparedness exercise was conducted on February 2, 1982.

Officials and representatives from the State of Michigan and the risk county of Monroe, and the licensee participated in this exercise. State and local officials demonstrated knowledge of their emergency response plans and procedures and successfully implemented them. The FEMA evaluation team identified no Level I Findings, one previous Level 2 Finding that was successfully demonstrated, three Level 2 Findings (redemonstrated), and three Plan Issues.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals "Who participated in the exercise and made it a success. Approximately 175 individuals participated in the off-site portion of the exercise, of which about one-third were local volunteers. The professionalism and teamwork of the participants was evident throughout all phases of the exercise.

Executive Summary 1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant This page is intentionally blank Executive Summary 2

. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant SECTION 1: Exercise Overview The DHS/FEMA's responsibilities in radiological emerg~ncy planning for *fixed nuclear facilities include the following:

Taking the lead in offsite emergency planning and in-the review and evaluation of Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans (RERPs) and procedures developed by State and local governments;

Determining whether such plans and procedures can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of exercises of the plans and procedures conducted by State and local governments;

- Responding to requests by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the NRC and FEMA dated December 7, 2015 (Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 88, May 9, 2017); and

Coordinating the activities of Federal agencies with responsibilities in the radiological emergency planning process:

o U.S. Department of Agriculture; o* U.S. Department of Commerce; o U.S. Department of Energy; o U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; o U.S. Department of the Interior; o U.S. Department of Transportation; o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; o U.S. Food and Drug Administration; and o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Representatives of these agencies serve on the DHS/FEMA Region V Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by DHS/FEMA.

A REP Full-Participation Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise was conducted on August 28, 2018, and evaluated by DHS/FEMA to assess the capabilities of State and local offsite emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their RERPs and procedures to protect the public's health and safety during a radiological emergency involving the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant. The purpose of this exercise report is to present the exercise results and findings on the performance of the Off-Site Response Organizations (ORO) during a simulated radiological em,ergency.

The findings presented in this report are based on the evaluations of the Federal evaluation team, with

final determinations made by the DHS/FEMA Region V RAC Chair, and approved by the DHS/FEMA Headquarters.

Section 1: Exercise Overview 3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program

. Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant The criteria utilized_ in the FEMA evaluation process are contained in:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," November 1980;and

FEMA P-1028 REP Program Manual, dated January 2016.

1.1 EXERCISE DETAILS EXERCISE NAME 2018 Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP), Full-Participation, Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise TYPE OF EXERCISE Plume Exposure Pathway EXERCISE DATE August 28, 2018 LOCATIONS See Appendices C and E for a complete list of locations.

SPONSORS Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division 7150 Harris Drive Dimondale, Michigan 48821 DTE Energy - Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant 6400 North Dixie Highway M/S 210 NOC EF2 Newport, MI 48166 PROGRAM Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program MISSION

Response

SCENARIO TYPE Radiological Emergency -

Section 1: Exercise Overview 4 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant 1.2 EXERCISE PLANNING TEAM LEADERSHIP Sean O'Leary Chair, Regional Assistance Committee Chief, Technological Hazards Branch DHS/FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street Chicago, Illinois 60605 312-408-5389 sean.oleary@fema.dhs.gov Dwaine Warren Exercise Director DHS/FEMA Region V

_ Supervisory Team Leader 536 South Clark Street Chicago, IL 60605 312-408-5342 dwaine.warren@fema.dhs.gov Stephen Tulley Assistant Exercise Director DHS/FEMA Region V Supervisory Team Leader 536 South Clark Street Chicago, IL 60605 312-408-4425 step hen.tulley@fema.dhs.gov Edward Golinski Assistant Exercise Director DHS/FEMA Region V Supervisory Team Leader 536 South Clark Street Chicago, IL 60605 312-408-5353 edward.golinski@fema.dhs.gov Katherine Boyce Site Specialist DHS/FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street Chicago, Illinois, 60605 312-408-5397 katherine. boyce@fema.dhs.gov Section 1: Exercise Overview 5 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Tonya Nobach Radiological Emergency Preparedness Unit Management Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division 7150 Harris Drive Dimondale, Michigan 48821 517-284-3956 NobachT@michigan.gov Section 1: Exercise Overview 6 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant 1.3 .PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS Agencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the exercise:

STATE ORGANIZATIONS Michfgan State Police Emergency Management/Homeland Security Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Michigan Department of Military Affairs Michigan Department of Transportation RISK COUNTY ORGANIZATIONS City of Monroe Dundee Township Fire Department Frenchtown CERT Frenchtown Fire Department Huron Fire Department Lake Erie Transit Michigan State University Extension Monroe Community Mental Health Authority Monroe Community Ambulance Monroe County Central Dispatch Monroe County Commission on Aging Monroe County Emergency Management Division Monroe County Health Department Monroe County Intermediate School District Monroe County Information Technology Monroe County Road Commission Monroe County Sheriffs Department Monroe Fire Department Monroe Public Safety Wayne County Emergency Management Wayne County DPS Wayne County Sheriffs Department Wayne County HVCW Wayne County RESA (schools)

Livonia Police Department Brownstown Fire Department Allen Park DERT Metro Airport Fire Department Rockwood Fire Department Wyandotte Fire Department Southgate Fire Department Section 1: Exercise Overview 7 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

,UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness *(REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Woodhaven Fire Department PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS American Red Cross DTE Energy ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Services (RACES)

Salvation Army FEDERAL ORGANIZATIONS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

National Weather Service Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Section 1: Exercise Overview 8 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant SECTION 2: Exercise Design Summary 2.1 EXERCISE PURPOSE AND DESIGN The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) administers the Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program pursuant to the regulations found in Title 44 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) parts 350, 351, and 352. Title 44 CFR Part 350 names sixteen planning standards that form the basis for radiological emergency response planning for state, tribal, and local governments impacted by the EPZs established for each nuclear power plant site in the United States. Title 44 CFR Part 350 sets forth the mechanisms for the formal review and approval of state, tribal, and local government radiological emergency response plans and procedures by FEMA. One of the REP Program requirements established by these regulations is the biennial exercise of offsite respons~ capabilities. During these exercises, FEMA evaluates state, tribal, and local government plans, procedures, and actions to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency at the nuclear plant.

FEMA provides a statement with the transmission of this Draft AAR/IP to the United States NRC that the affected state, tribal, and local plans and preparedness are: (1) adequate to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of the nuclear power facility by providing reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite .in the event of a radiological emergency; and (2) capable of being implemented. The report and statement are based on the results of this exercise, review of the radiological emergency response plans and procedures, and verification of the periodic requirements set forth in "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation ofRadiologi,cal Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support ofNuclear Power Plants," November 1980 (NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1) through the annual letter of certification and staff assistance visits, Formal submission of the radiological emergency response plans for the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant to FEMA Region V by the State of Michigan occurred in May and June, 2018 for Wayne and Monroe Counties respectively. Formal approval of these RERPs was granted by FEMA on July 10, 2018 for Wayne County and on July 27, 2018 for Monroe County, under 44 CFR 350.

2.2 FEMA CORE CAPABILITIES AND EXERCISE OBJECTIVES Core Capabilities-based planning allows for exercise planning teams to develop exercise objectives and observe exercise outcomes through a framework of specific action items. Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program methodology, the exercise objectives meet the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program requirements and encompass the emergency preparedness evaluation areas. The critical tasks to be demonstrated were negotiated with the State of Michigan and Monroe and Wayne Counties. The Core Capabilities demonstrated during this exercise were:

Operational Coordination: Establish and maintain a unified and coordinated operational structure and process that appropriately integrates all critical stakeholders and supports the execution of Core Capabilities. Mobilize all critical resources and establish command, control, and coordination structures within the affected community, in other coordinating bodies in surrounding communities, and across the Nation, and maintain as needed throughout the duration of an incident. Enhance and maintain command, control, and coordination structures consistent with the National Incident Management System (NIMS) to meet basic human needs, stabilize the incident, and transition to recovery.

Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 9 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Situational Assessment: Provide all decision makers with decision-relevant information regarding the nature and extent of the hazard, any cascading effects, and the status of the response. Deliver information sufficient to inform decision making regarding immediate lifesaving and life-sustaining activities, and engage governmental, private, and civic sector resources within and outside of the affected area to meet basic human needs and stabilize the incident. Deliver enhanced information to reinforce ongoing lifesaving and life-sustaining activities, and engage governmental, private, and civic sector resources within and outside of the affected area to meet basic human needs, stabilize the incident, and transition to recovery.

Public Information and Warning: Deliver coordinated, prompt, reliable, and actionable information to the whole community through the use of clear, consistent, accessible, and culturally and linguistically appropriate methods to effectively relay information regarding any threat or hazard and, as appropriate, the actions being taken and the assistance being made available. Inform all affected segments of society of critical lifesaving and life-sustaining information by all means necessary, including accessible tools, to expedite the delivery of emergency services and aid the public to take protective actions. Deliver credible and actionable messages to inform ongoing emergency services and the public about protective measures and other life-sustaining actions, and facilitate the transition to recovery.

Environmental Response/Health and Safety: Conduct appropriate measures to ensure the protection of the health and safety of the public and workers, as well as the environment, from-all-hazards in support of responder operations and the affected communities. Identify, assess, and mitigate worker health and safety hazards, and disseminate health and safety guidance and resources to response and recovery workers. Minimize public exposure to environmental hazards through assessment of the hazards and implementation of public protective actions. Detect, assess, stabilize, and clean up releases of oil and hazardous materials into the environment, including buildings/structures, and properly manage waste.

Identify, evaluate, and implement measures to prevent and minimize impacts to the environment, natural and cultural resources, and historic properties from all-hazard emergencies and response operations.

On-Scene Security, Protection, and Law Enforcement: Ensure a safe and secure environment through .

law enforcement and related security and protection operations for people and communities located within affected areas and also for response personnel engaged in lifesaving and life-sustaining operations.

Establish a safe and secure environment in an affected area. Provide and maintain on-scene security and

meet the protection needs of the affected population over a geographically dispersed area while eliminating or mitigating the risk of further damage to persons, property, and the environment.

Critical Transportation: Provide transportation (including infrastructure access and accessible transportation services) for response priority objectives, including the evacuation of people and animals, and the delivery of vital response personnel, equipment, and services into the affected areas. Establish physical access through appropriate transportation corridors and deliver required resources to save lives and to meet the needs of disaster survivors. Ensure basic human needs are met, stabilize the incident, transition into recovery for an affected area, and restore basic services and community functionality. Clear debris from any route type (i.e., road, rail, airfield, port facility, waterway) to facilitate response operations.

Mass Care Services: Provide life-sustaining and human services to the affected population, to include hydration, feeding, sheltering, temporary housing, evacuee support, reunification, and distribution of emergency supplies. Move and deliver resources and capabilities to meet the needs of disaster survivors, including individuals with access and functional needs. Establish, staff, and equip emergency shelters and other temporary housing options (including acc~ssible housing) for the affected population. Move from Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 10 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant congregate care to non-congregate care alternatives and provide relocation assistance or interim housing solutions for families unable to return to their pre-disaster homes.

Public Health, Healthcare, and Emergency Medical Services: Provide lifesaving medical treatment via Emergency Medical Services and related operations and avoid additional disease and injury by providing targeted public health, medical and behavioral health support, and products to all affected populations. Deliver medical countermeasures to exposed populations. Complete triage and initial stabilization of casualties, and begin definitive care for those likely to survive their injuries and illnesses.

Return medical surge resources to pre-incident levels, complete health assessments, and identify recovery processes.

Operational Communications: Ensure the capacity for timely communications in support of security, situational awareness, and operations, by any and all means available, among and between affected communities in the impact area and all response forces. Ensure the capacity to communicate with both the emergency response community and the affected populations and establish interoperable voice and data communications between Federal, tribal, state, and local first responders.

Infrastructure Systems: Stabilize critical infrastructure functions, minimize health and safety threats, and efficiently restore and revitalize systems and services to support a viable, resilient community. Re-establish critical infrastructure within the affected areas to support ongoing emergency response operations, life sustainment, community functionality, and a transition to recovery. Provide for the clearance, removal, and disposal of debris. This core capability includes the capability to address roadway impediments due to landslides and other events that impair/impede safe evacuation of the public.

The Core Capabilities and their associated Evaluation Criteria selected for demonstration by the jurisdictions establish the assessment objectives for the exercise. These Core Capabilities, when successfully demonstrated, meet the exercise objectives.

The objectives for this exercise were as follows:

Objective 1: Demonstrate the ability to provide direction and control and make protective action decisions through the state emergency operations centers, county emergency operations centers, and field activities by exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Objective 2: Demonstrate the ability to make protective action decisions affecting state and county emergency workers and the public through exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Objective 3: Demonstrate the ability to implement protective actions for state and county emergency workers and the public through exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Objective 4: Demonstrate the ability to activate the prompt alert and notification system utilizing the primary notification system and the emergency alert system through exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Objective 5: Demonstrate the effectiveness of plans, policies, and procedures in the joint information centers and the joint information system for public and private sector emergency information-communications through exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Objective 6: Demonstrate the ability to monitor, decontaminate, register, and shelter evacuees through exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures.

Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 11 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Objective 7: Demonstrate the ability to provide dose projection and protective action decision making for the plume phase.

Objective 8: Demonstrate the capacity for timely communications in support of security, situational awareness, and operations in accordance with the plan, procedures, and Extent-of-Play Agreement, among and between affected communities in the impact area and all response forces.

Objective 9: Demonstrate the capacity to stabilize critical infrastructure functions, minimize health and safety threats, and efficiently restore and revitalize systems and services to support a viable, resilient community. Demonstrate the capacity to provide transportation (including infrastructure access and accessible transportation services) for response priority objectives, including the evacuation of people and

.animals, and the delivery of vital response personnel, equipment, and services into the affected areas.

Collectively, these nine Objectives successfully demonstrated the Core Capabilities and Evaluation Criteria selected by the jurisdictions in accordance with NUREG-0654/FEM-REP-1 and the REP Program Manual (FEMA P-1028, dated January 2016).

Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 12 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant SECTION 3: Analysis of Capabilities 3.1

SUMMARY

RESULTS OF EXERCISE EVALUATION This section provides a combined assessment of state and local jurisdictions based upon their collective demonstrated performance under the core capabilities associated with the exercise evaluation criteria described in Appendix E Extent-of-Play Agreements. It employs an integration of the Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation Program and REP Program evaluation methodologies - an analytical process used to assess the demonstration of specific capabilities during an exercise. A capability provides a means to perform one or more critical tasks under specified conditions and to specific performance standards. Core capabilities form the foundation of the National Preparedness System. The REP Program evaluation criteria provide the conditions and performance standards for establishing reasonable assurance that State and Local authorities can protect public health and safety in response to a nuclear power plant accident.

An overall summary of demonstrated capabilities is presented in Section 3.2, Tables 3.2.1 through 3.2.4, of this report. Criteria-specific narrative summaries are presented in Section 3.3 of the report. The narratives summarize observations made pursuant to the REPP Evaluation Criteria used to assess the organizations and locations that were selected by the State of Michigan and Monroe and Wayne Counties.

The organizations, locations, and evaluation criteria selected by the State of Michigan and Monroe and Wayne Counties are described in Appendix E, Extent-of-Play Agreements, which were approved by DHS/FEMA on May 22, 2018.

The results of the assessment are summarized below by Core Capability, as demonstrated during the August 28, 2018, FNPP REP Partial-Participation Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise.

Operational Coordination: Key leadership personnel established and maintained a unified and coordinated operational structure which provided effective and responsive command, direction and control and coordination within and between the affected jurisdictions to meet basic human needs and stabilize the incident.

Critical stakeholders were appropriately integrated within the overall decision-making process, which enabled protective action recommendations to be evaluated in an appropriate and timely manner. This process included input from both relevant critical stakeholders and support personnel and took into account the safety and well-being of emergency workers and the general public and protecting property and infrastructure protective action decisions were made without undue delay.

Situational Assessment: Decision makers were provided with decision-relevant information regarding the nature and extent of the simulated radiological and other hazards, any cascading effects, and the status of the response. The Michigan State Police Emergency Management/Homeland Security Division, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services demonstrated proficiency in the use of dose assessment software to calculate dose projections independent of the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant's dose projections. The staff calculated hypothetical dose projections based on plant conditions, possible release scenarios, and Controller-injected field monitoring team data. Leadership was prepared to gather and deliver enhanced information to reinforce lifesaving and life-sustaining activities, if needed, and engage governmental and private sector resources within and outside of the affected area to meet basic human needs and stabilize the incident, as necessary.

Public Information and Warning: The jurisdictions as a whole demonstrated the ability to deliver coordinated, prompt, reliable and actionable information to the whole community through the use of Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 13 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant clear, consistent and accessible means. Accurate initial information and follow-up on instructions were made with the formulation of news releases being reviewed from the Joint Information System and

. briefings conducted at the FNPP Joint Public Information Center and at the Monroe County EMA. Alert and notification of the public and media was completed in a timely manner by simulated means of sounding of sirens, Emergency Alert System messaging (IPAWs), warning in state parks, news releases and media briefings. The simulated release of information via the aforementioned public information modes were consistent with protective action decisions and contained applicable and specific instructions relative to those decisions.

Environmental Response/Health and Safety: Appropriate measures were taken to ensure the protection of the health and safety of the public and workers, as well as the environment in support ofresponder operations and the affected communities. The availability of guidance and resources to address hazardous radiological materials was integrated in support of responder operations and the affected communities.

State Liaisons at the FNPP Emergency Operations Facility communicated well with the State Emergency Operations Center to ensure that state protective action recommendations and county protective action decisions and responses were coordinated properly. Leadership identified, assessed, and mitigated worker health and safety hazards and disseminated health and safety guidance and resources to responders in accordance with the scenario, plans and procedures, and the extent-of-play agreements.

On-Scene Security and Protection: State and local law enforcement agencies demonstrated the capability to ensure a safe and secure environment through law enforcement and related security and protection operations for people and communities located within affected areas and also for response personnel who could have been directed to engage in lifesaving and life-sustaining operations. The implementation of traffic and access control was appropriately assessed and coordinated in a timely manner. On-scene security at EOCs, schools, reception centers and other facilities met protection requirements and eliminated or mitigated the risk of damage to persons, property, and the environment.

Critical Transportation: Officials demonstrated the capability to provide infrastructure access and accessible transportation services for response priority objectives, including the evacuation of people and animals and the delivery of vital response personnel, equipment, and services into the affected areas.

School officials effectively demonstrated the ability to implement protective actions for affected lo~al schools.

Mass Care Services: Congregate care center staff demonstrated the ability to provide life-sustaining services to affected populations with a focus on family reunification, feeding and sheltering. The American Red Cross, which manages all shelter operations under the REP Program, demonstrated the ability to provide resources, services and accommodations consistent with planning guidelines. They also demonstrated knowledge of the process, and to determine whether evacuees had been monitored for contamination and determined to be acceptable before entering congregate care facilities.

Public Health, Healthcare, and Medical Services: Not Selected - This capability will be demonstrated during the fall of 2018. Qualified medical personnel successfully demonstrate the ability to provide targeted public health, medical, and behavioral health support and products to populations that might enter shelters and deliver medical countermeasures to exposed populations.

Operational Communications: Evaluation Criterion ldl, which is the key criterion for this capability, was evaluated for applicable organizations and functional entities. Each applicable organization and location demonstrated the capacity for timely communications in support of security, situational awareness, and operations by primary and backup means, the ability to communicate with both the emergency response community and the affected populations, and to establish interoperable Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 14 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant communications between Federal, state, and local all response* groups and locations and between affected communities in the impact area.

Infrastructure Systems: Evaluation Criterion 3d2, which is the key criterion for this capability, was assessed pursuant to Monroe and Wayne Counties' capability to address impediments to mass evacuation.

Monroe and Wayne Counties demonstrated the capability to address roadway impediments due to landslides and other events that impair/impede safe evacuation of the public.

3.2 EXERCISE EVALUATION AND RESULTS This section contains the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the August 28, 2018 Plume Exposure Pathway exercise and out-of-sequence interviews and demonstrations.

Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated based on their demonstration of Core Capabilities and their equivalent Radiological Emergency Preparedness Evaluation Criteria, as delineated in the Federal Emergency Management Agency Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Manual dated January 2016. Exercise criteria are listed by number, and the demonstration status of those criteria are indicated by the use of the following terms:

M: Met (no unresolved Level I or Level 2 findings were assessed, and there were no unresolved findings from prior exercises)

Level 1 Finding was assessed

Level 2 Finding was assessed or an unresolved Level 2 finding(s) from a prior exercise

P: Plan Issue was assessed

ND: Not Demonstrated

NS: Not Selected (the Criterion was not selected for demonstration)

Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 15 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant This page is intentionally blank Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 16 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Table 3.2.1-Summary of Exercise Evaluation - State of Michigan/Joint Information Center Operations DATE: August 28, 2018 SITE: Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant M:Met Mobilization lal M M M M M M M Facilities 1bl Direction and Control lcl M M M M Communications Equipment ldl M M M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M M M Eto:t~~1"1e'8ctibifi:ptci:Sii5rf:?MitRUigfit$,~1:('l:!"!~:~ '::!(:;",§ ,,ii,ilki ,:;*;: "* . * * * :'~*,"* . :,.:,~;r; [~{: if'ts~ .J,,:1:~ 1'.,!f;t EW Exposure Control Decisions 2al M P M M PARs 2bl M M PADs 2b2 P M PADs for Disabled/Functional Needs 2cl M M Ingestion PADs 2dl RRR Decisions 2el EW Exposure Control Implementation 3al M M M KI Public/Institutionalized 3bl M PAD Implementation Disabled/Functional Needs 3cl PAD Implementation Schools 3c2 TACP Establishment 3dl M Impediments 3d2 Implement Ingestion PADs 3el Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation ofRRR Decisions 3fl Ei.elfl>>i,')A~~~i,i~ntni'ld1A.naJysJ.lf.; ~::: ;~,!t:*;,;: .:3:;s'J;;: * ,~z' ;; *"*" 1H:.*.w.*)t,,i~;:,,:

RESERVED 4al Field Team Management 4a2 M M M Field Team Operations 4a3 M P L2 Field Team Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl Initial Alert and Notification 5al M RESERVED 5a2 Backup Alert and Notification 5a3 Exception Area Alerting 5a4 Subsequent Information and Instructions 5bl M L2 Reception Center Operations 6al EW Monitoring and Decontamination 6bl Congregate Care 6cl Contaminated Injured Transport and Care 6dl Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 17 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Table 3.2.2 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation - Michigan Department of Environmental Quality DATE: August 28, 2018 SITE: Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant M:Met L1 : Level 1 Finding L2: Level 2 Finding P: Plan Issue ND: Not Demonstrated NS: Not Selected lfo1ergency Qperations Map.agemerit Mobilization lal Facilities lbl Direction and Control lcl Communications Equipment ldl M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M EW Exposure Control Decisions 2al PARs 2bl PADs 2b2 P ADs for Disabled/Functional Needs 2cl Ingestion PADs 2dl RRR Decisions 2el Pmt¢ctive.k\gtJon. lmPle111entati.011 EW Exposure Control lnlplementation 3al M M M M KI Public/Institutionalized 3bl PAD Implementation Disabled/Functional Needs 3cl

. PAD lnlplementation Schools 3c2 T ACP Establishment 3dl Impediments 3d2 Iniplement Ingestion P ADs 3el Ingestion-Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation ofRRR Decisions 3fl RESERVED 4al Field Team Management 4a2 Field Team Operations 4a3 Field Team Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl Initial Alert and Notification Sal RESERVED 5a2 Backup Alert and Notification 5a3 Exception Area Alerting 5a4 Subsequent Information and Instructions Sbl

'.~lJPPQrt Qperations and,Faciliti~;,

Reception Genter Operations 6al EW Monitoring and Decontamination 6bl M M M M Congregate Care 6cl Contaminated 111jured Transport and Care 6dl Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 18 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Table 3.2.3 -Summary of Exercise Evaluation- Monroe County DAIB: August 28, 2018 1:! ti-...

o u

<l)

-~04 .::: I SITE: Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant M:Met p.,

.::: 0 w i::r: .9 "la ~

.s

.9

~ b 00 L1: Level 1 Finding 5

"la i u () 0 jg i.§@

()

~ :::: b .§ 0 s

L2: Level 2 Finding P: Plan Issue ND: Not Demonstrated

~

I

e.:::

u 0

<l) 0 a

0 "la

~

u 0..

1l .:::

p..,

8 w

u 8

...0 s

Q p.,

u 0

Q

<l) p.,

u "'U NS: Not Selected u ..... ::8 ::8 ::8 ~ i'.S i'.S 8 ::8

,* .. ,. : ... ,.c,*

Enreygency*'C>oef:ittt&hs:Mii'ifig~m~Jif4\ '.); * ...: .. :}{* I* ,;,.-,; :(. ",~i Ii~, \ . -~ .'*, :. . :':.:!:';;: I<*0 l ~*.'* ,. *'

Mobilization lal M M M Facilities lbl Direction and Control lcl M M M Communications Equipment ldl M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M M

.* _.,j i:J,:;:, ..

Rti.>t~ctbie ActioliTu)~f~iG6-M~foi?i:'::" 1: .. . /.( 1::.{ *:: . ,l .. ~*.: .. 'l.:}i":i il '. .*... : ... *.

. ; ~.:

EW Exposure Control Decisions 2al M PARs 2bl M PADs 2b2 P ADs for Disabled/Functional Needs 2cl M Ingestion P ADs 2dl RRR Decisions 2el

££9Je#IVeActjqn.Jrrfolem~n~tici1f~I~i: ... .... _:_>.. '~/ .. *. .c .: {;, I*,:

1,*;*

1**,*--***

~

.. :,.. j,.' . .. ..

/" *co/ ,*

~' '"

EW Exposure Control Implementation 3al M M M KI Public/Institutionalized 3bl M PAD Implementation Disabled/Functional Needs 3cl M PAD Implementation Schools 3c2 M T ACP Establishment 3dl M M Impediments 3d2 M Implement Ingestion P ADs 3el Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation ofRRR Decisions 3fl

.:';{; ,..:

~

F'.i~!d M~as\l(ei:Rei:1{~4 ApaJysi{'.~ii~t:'., '"' ,; d .,, '* .. ' . :~ l?f \', ': . *"* .,-.:~]§); ~-. ~ ..*.

RESERVED 4al Field Team Management 4a2 Field Team Operations 4a3 Field Team Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl

.... ;', *1,, .' .,:t>J li')(?,F ';,_;

EfuergencyNoHti~!tf6ii ~d~Publi~!lttifo;::, *

~

' 'G:: ): ',,

Initial Alert and Notification Sal L2 RESERVED 5a2 Backup Alert and Notification 5a3 Exception Area Alerting 5a4 Subsequent Information and Instructions Sbl M M M

.. l;'j/(';* ..

'Sli.ppprt ()perll.tigns artij:F'a9ilitJetl~ffif, ;* :'::, ' * .. """ ;,,, . .. *\l,r; Reception Center Operations 6al EW Monitoring and Decontamination 6bl Congregate Care 6cl Contaminated Injured Transport and Care 6dl Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 19 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Table 3.2.4 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation - Monroe County Out-of-Sequence Activities DATE: August 28, 2018 SITE: Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant M:Met LI: Level 1 Finding L2: Level 2 Finding P: Plan Issue ND: Not Demonstrated NS: Not Selected Mobilization lal Facilities lbl Direction and Control lcl M M Communications Equipment ldl M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M EW Exposure Control Decisions 2al PARs 2bl PADs 2b2 PADs for Disabled/Functional Needs 2cl Ingestion PADs 2dl RRR Decisions 2el EW Exposure Control Implementation 3al M M M M KI Public/Institutionalized 3bl PAD Implementation Disabled/Functional Needs 3cl PAD Implementation Schools 3c2 M TACP Establishment 3dl Impediments 3d2 Implement Ingestion PADs 3el Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation ofRRR Decisions 3fl RESERVED 4al Field Team Management 4a2 Field Team Operations 4a3 Field Team Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl

<* '/' - ,,-

Initial Alert and Notification Sal RESERVED 5a2 Backup Alert and Notification 5a3 Exception Area Alerting 5a4 Subsequent Information and Instructions 5bl

-,7'- ,,, -"*~-

Support Qperatiov~ and J<'acilities - - ;' ... ,, : "

Reception Center Operations 6al M M M M EW Monitoring and Decontamination 6bl Congregate Care 6cl M M Contaminated Injured Transport and Care 6dl Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 20 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Table 3.2.5 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation- Wayne County DATE: August 28, 2018 SITE: Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant M:Met LI: Level I Finding L2: Level 2 Finding P: Plan Issue ND: Not Demonstrated NS: Not Selected

. ;:c . ,

Mobilization lal M M M Facilities lbl Direction and Control lcl M M M Communications Equipment ldl M M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lel M M M M M EW Exposure Control Decisions 2al M PARs 2bl M PADs 2b2 PADs for Disabled/Functional Needs 2cl M Ingestion PADs 2dl RRR Decisions 2el

--* __..,. - ~

- ~~ ~ - . ' '- -*-

EW Exposure Control Implementation 3al M M M M KI Public/Institutionalized 3bl M PAD Implementation Disabled/Functional Needs 3cl M PAD Implementation Schools 3c2 M TACP Establishment 3dl M M Impediments 3d2 M Implement Ingestion P ADs 3el Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation ofRRR Decisions 3fl

., , ,.,_ .* ..,:i: ,, '" i\' __ -

RESERVED 4al Field Team Management 4a2 Field Team Operations 4a3 Field Team Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl

,: ,. :)-' ,,

Initial Alert and Notification Sal M RESERVED 5a2 Backup Alert and Notification 5a3 Exception Area Alerting 5a4

Subsequent Information and Instructions Sbl M M Reception Center Operations 6al EW Monitoring and Decontamination 6bl M M Congregate Care 6cl Contaminated Injured Transport and Care 6dl Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 21 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant This page is intentionally blank Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 22 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant 3.3 JURISDICTIONAL

SUMMARY

OF EXERCISE EVALUATION RESULTS The following sections present narrative summaries that describe observations made during the exercise pursuant to the Evaluation Criteria and Core Capabilities demonstrated at each jurisdiction's response locations. Narrative summaries are organized by Jurisdiction, Location, Assessed Core Capability, and the Evaluation Criterion discussed in the Appendix E Extent-of-Play Agreements. The results of the assessments are summarized in Tables 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, and 3.2.5.

3.3.1 State of Michigan In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for the State of Michigan is as follows:

3 .3 .1.1 State of Michigan - Initial Notification Point Criterion I .a. I --: Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications 3 .3 .1.2 State of Michigan :- State Emergency Operations Center Criterion I .a. I - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l.c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety .

Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources

. Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 2.a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 2.b.2 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Intelligence and Information Sharing Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 23 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 2.c. I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment

Criterion 3.b.I - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Criterion 3.d.I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: On-Scene Security and Protection Criterion 5.a. I - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion 5.b. I - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Communications 3.3.1.3 Incident Management Group Criterion I .a. I - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion 1.d. I - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion I.e. I - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health arid Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 2.a. I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 24 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 2.b. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Intelligence and Information Sharing Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 2.b.2 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Intelligence and Information Sharing Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 2.c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment 3 .3 .1.4 Field Team Center - MSP Monroe Post Criterion l .a. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a.1 -:--- Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 4.a.2 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 25 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Situational Assessment -

3.3.1.5 Field Team 1 - MSP Monroe Post Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operation Communications Criterion l .e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3.a.l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 4.a.3 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety 3.3.1.6 Field Team 2-MSP Monroe Post Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a. l __:_ Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 4.a.3 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety 3.3.1.7 Joint Information Center Criterion l .a. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion 1.e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 26 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 5.b. l - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Communications 3 .3 .1.8 State Liaison - Monroe County Emergency Operations Center Criterion 1.a. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .c. l --:- Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability:. Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 2.a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Situational Assessment 3 .3 .1.9 State Liaison - Wayne County Emergency Operations Center Criterion l .a. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion 1.c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l .e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 27 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 2.a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Situational Assessment 3 .3 .1.10 MDEQ FTC Emergency Worker Equipment/Vehicle Monitoring/Decontamination - MSP Monroe Post Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3.a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.b.l - Core Capability: Environmental"Response/Health and Safety 3 .3 .1.11 MDEQ FTC Emergency Worker Monitoring/Decontamination - MSP Monroe Post Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. .1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services

. Criterion 3 .a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.b. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety 3 .3 .1.12 MDEQ Representative - Emergency Worker Equipment/Vehicle Monitor/Decontamination

- Brownstown F. S. #4 Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 28 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Criterion 1.e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a. I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.b. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety 3 .3 .1.13 MDEQ Representative - Emergency Worker Monitor/Decontamination

- Brownstown F .S. #4 Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3.a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.b.l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for the State of Michigan is as follows:

a. MET: All Core Capabilities and Evaluation Criteria identified in the DHS/FEMA-approved extent-of-play agreement.

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: TWO - REDEMONSTRATED (SEE APPENDIX A)

d. PLAN ISSUES: THREE (SEE APPENDIX A)

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE

f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdiction - Monroe County In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for Momoe County is as follows:

Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 29 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant 3 .3 .2.1 Initial Notification Point Criterion 1.a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Communications

Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications 3.3.2.2 Monroe County Emergency Operations Center Criterion l .a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 2.a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 2.b.l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Intelligence and Information Sharing Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 2.c.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 3 .a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 30 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 3.b.I -Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety.

Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Criterion 3.c. I - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical.Transportation Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 3 .c.2 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 3.d.I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: On-Scene Security and Protection Criterion 3.d.2 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: Infrastructure Systems Criterion 5 .a. I - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion 5.b. I - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Communications 3.3.2.3 Monroe County Rep at the Joint Information Center Criterion I .a. I - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion I .c. I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 31 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion I .d.1 - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion 1.e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 5.b.1 - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Communications 3.3.2.4 MCEM Public Hotline Rumor Control Criterion l .c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l .d.1- Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 5.b.1- Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Communications 3.3.2.5 TACP Dosimetry Brief Criterion 1.e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 32 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Criterion :3'.a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety 3.3.2.6 Traffic and Access Control Po1nt Demonstration Criterion l .d.1- Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 3 .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: On-Scene Security and Protection 3*.3.2.7 Dosimetry/Sodium Iodide Stocks - Monroe County Health Department Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for Monroe County is as follows:

a. MET: AU Core Capabilities and Evaluation Criteria identified in the DHS/FEMA-approved extent-of-play agreement.

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: ONE - REDEMONSTRATED (SEE APPENDIX A)

d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED (SEE APPENDIX A)

f. PRIORISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 33 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant 3.3.3 Risk Jurisdiction - Monroe County, Out-of-Sequence In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for the Goodhue County is as follows:

3.3.3.1 EV-2 School Interview Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3.c.2 -Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety 3.3.3.2 Public Reception/Decontamination/Congregate Care Center - Summerfield High School Criterion l .c.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l .d.1 - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion 1.e.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.a.1 - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Criterion 6.c.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 34 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Mass Care Services 3.3.3.3 MDEQ Representative - Summerfield High School Criterion 1.d.1 - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.a. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services 3.3.3.4 Public Reception/Decontamination/Congregate Care Center - Mason High School Criterion l .c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l .d.1 - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability,: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Enviro"nmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.c.1 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Mass Care Services 3.3.3.5 MDEQ Representative - Mason High School Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 35 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3.a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.a. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for Monroe County, Out-of-Sequence is as follows:

a. MET: All Core Capabilities and Evaluation Criteria identified in the DHS/FEMA-approved extent-of-play agreement.

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE

d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE

e. PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE

f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE 3.3.4 Host Jurisdiction - Wayne County In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for the State of Wisconsin is as follows:

3.3.4.1 Initial Notification Point Criterion l .a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l.d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications 3.3.4.2 Wayne County Emergency Operations Center Criterion l .a.1 - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 36 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 2.a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 2.b. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Intelligence and Information Sharing Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 2.c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion 3 .a. I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 3.b.l - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Criterion 3 .c.1 - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 37 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 3 .c.2 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 3 .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination

Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: On-Scene Security and Protection Criterion 3.d.2 - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: Infrastructure Systems Criterion 5.a. l - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion 5.b. l - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Core Capability: Operational Communications 3.3.4.3 Wayne County Representative at Joint Information Center Criterion I.a. I - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .c. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Criterion l.d.l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion l .e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 5.b. l - Core Capability: Public Information and Warning Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 38 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Rad.iological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Core Capability: Operational Communications 3.3.4.4 Traffic and Access Control Point Demonstration - Brownstown F.S. #4 Criterion I .d. I - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion I.e. I - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Service_s Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3.a. I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 3.d.I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Critical Transportation Core Capability: On-Scene Security and Protection 3.3.4.5 Emergency Worker Equipment/Vehicle Monitoring/Decontamination - Brownstown F.S. #4 Criterion I .d. I - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion I.e. I - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a. I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.b. I - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety 3.3.4.6 Emergency Worker Monitor/Decontamination- Brownstown F.S. #4 Criterion I .c. I - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Operational Communications Core Capability: Situational Assessment Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 39 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Criterion l .d. l - Core Capability: Operational Communications Criterion i.e. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Core Capability: Mass Care Services Core Capability: Public and Private Services and Resources Core Capability: Public Health and Medical Services Criterion 3 .a. l - Core Capability: Operational Coordination Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety Criterion 6.b. l - Core Capability: Environmental Response/Health and Safety In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA-evaluated core capabilities and criteria for Wayne County is as follows:

a. MET: All Core Capabilities and Evaluation Criteria identified in the DHS/FEMA-approved extent-of-play agreement.

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: NONE

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: NONE

d. PLAN ISSUES: NONE

e. PRIORISSUES: RESOLVED: NONE

f. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: NONE Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 40 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant SECTION 4: Conclusion The exercise resulted in no Level 1 Findings. There were three Level 2 Findings, two for the State of Michigan and one for the risk county of Monroe, which were successfully re-demonstrated. There were three Plan Issues for the State of Michigan, which remain open.

Based on the results of the exercise, the planning and preparedness for the State of Michigan and affected local jurisdictions provide reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can be taken to protect public health and safety. Therefore, Title 44 CFR Part 350, approval of the offsite radiological emergency response plans and preparedness for the state of Michigan, remains in effect.

Section 4: Conclusion 41 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant This page is intentionally blank Section 4: Conclusion 42 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX A: Improvement Plan This appendix summarizes the findings from the of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the August 28, 2018, Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Plume Pathway Exercise to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of State and local governments in the 10-mile EPZ surrounding the FNPP, recommended corrective actions, and a schedule of corrective actions for the identified primary responsible agency.

Finding: 23-16-Sal-A-01 ORO: Monroe County Criterion: 5.a.1 CONDITION: The faxes that were sent to WJR at 1214 and 1224 hours0.0142 days 0.34 hours 0.00202 weeks 4.65732e-4 months , (received at 1215 and 1227) outlining an Emergency Alert System (EAS) to be.broadcast were not written so as to permit radio station personnel to directly read the information to the public. The EAS message required radio station personnel to obtain information from a 6 page fax regarding evacuation routes and reception centers. Area 6, another evacuated area, did not have an evacuation route stated in the EAS message. Similarly, the second EAS message contained conflicting information for areas 1, 2, and 4, with no information for areas 6 and 7. The transmitted EAS message also required WJR to broadcast information regarding reception centers.

However, the information in the fax was difficult to decipher, as there were notes about whether the reception center was open, and whether to include all reception centers or just the open ones.

Staff at the Monroe County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) did not coordinate with and did not verify with WJR staff when sirens were to sound and when the EAS message was to be broadcast or if radio station staff had any questions. The BAS.message was the PAO to evacuate PAA 1, 2, & 6 and had been faxed to the radio station. Although the Emergency Management Director (EMD) called radio station WJR at 1214 hours0.0141 days 0.337 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.61927e-4 months and confirmed the fax had been received, he did not allow time for the radio station staff to prepare text for broadcast or to record the message before sounding sirens at 1217 hours0.0141 days 0.338 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.630685e-4 months . The radio*

station staff had difficulty sorting through the six page fax due to inconsistencies in the information that had been sent POSSIBLE CAUSE: The possible cause of the EAS process is a lack of coordination between the EOC and radio station as to what and when events should happen. Procedures for the station staff were not available. Documentation sent to the station contained inconsistent information.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.5, 6, 7 POTENTIAL EFFECT: The potential effect of a cumbersome EAS process and lack of coordination is the possibility that EAS messages* may be sent out of sequence relative to siren sounding, messages may not be sent in a timely manner or may contain erroneous information.

RECOMMENDATION: Ensure that enough time exists between the decision to activate the sirens and EAS and their actual activation. Coordination between the EOC and radio station as to when sirens are sounded and when the EAS is broadcast is to occur. Staff should review procedures prior to the GE ECL to ensure any preparations that can be made in advance of the decision are done so. Review documents relating to EAS messaging for clarity and remove any unnecessary documents from the fax packet sent Appendix A: Improvement Plan 43 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program

.Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Finding: 23-16-Sal-A-01 ORO: Monroe County Criterion: 5.a.1 to the radio station. Provide the radio station with training and procedures to more familiarize staff with procedures.

SCHEDULE OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: Successfully demonstrated during this exercise.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION: Successfully demonstrated during this exercise. This issue is closed.

REP ASSESSMENT AREA: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

Emergency Notification and Public Information Monroe County CORE CAPABILITY ELEMENT: AGENCYPOC:

Public Information and Warning, Operational Mark Hammond - Monroe County Emergency Coordination, Operational Communications Management Director ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

NIA Appendix A: Improvement Plan 44 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Issue: 23-18-5bl-L2-01 ORO: State of Michigan Joint Information Center Criterion: 5.b.1 CONDITION: Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development issued three agriculture advisories at 1120 EDT due to the declaration of a General Emergency at the Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant.

All three advisories listed Palisades Nuclear Power Plant in the body of the advisory.

POSSIBLE CAUSE:

The persons responsible for issuing the advisories did not proof read the advisories closely to insure all information was correct.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l, E.5, 7; G.3.a, G.4.a, c I

POTENTIAL EFFECT: Conflicting information released to the public could cause confusion and a

uncertainty to the agricultural community promote lack of confidence in the information being released.

RECOMMENDATION: The Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development identified the error after release of the advisories and issued updated corrected advisories at 1210 EDT SCHEDULE OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: Successfully redemonstrated.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

The Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development identified the error after release of the advisories and issued updated corrected advisories at 1210 Eastern Daylight Time, REP ASSESSMENT AREA: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

Emergency Notification and Public Information CORE CAPABILITY ELEMENT: AGENCYPOC:

Public Information and Warning, Operational Communications ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

NIA Appendix A: Improvement Plan 45 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Issue: 23-18-4a3-L2-02 ORO: State of Michigan Field Monitoring Team 2 Criterion: 4.a.3 CONDITION: Field Monitoring Team 2 (FMT-2) members were not able to provide the Field Team Center with field data pertaining to the measurement of airborne radioiodine and particulates.

POSSIBLE CAUSE:

1) A FMT-2 member attempted to complete the procedure for the measurement of airborne radioiodine and particulates "from memory" and missed two steps.

2) In the printed SOGs, the pages jumped from 62 to 70 and some of the steps for measurement of airborne radioiodine and particulates appeared to be omitted.

3) Prior to the day of the demonstration, the procedure for the measurement of airborne radioiodine and particulates had been changed, and pages 63 through 69 had been removed from the printed SOGs for that reason. The procedure should have been continued by following Step 10 of the Field Monitoring RadResponder Guide on page 43 of the SOGs. However, there were no instructions following Step 18 on page 62 to do so.

REFERENCE:

Michigan Nuclear Facilities Emergency Management Plan.

Michigan Nuclear Power Plant / Radiological Emergency Response Standard Operating Guide; Field Monitoring Team NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, 1.8, 1.9c POTENTIAL EFFECT: The inability of field monitoring teams to provide field data pertaining to the measurement of airborne radioiodine and particulates could result in an inability to monitor actual or potential offsite consequences of a radiological emergency condition.

RECOMMENDATION: The issue was corrected through retraining of the FMT-2 members on the measurement of airborne radioiodine and particulates, and re-demonstration of the criteria.

ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS

1) Assemble printed copies of Standard Operating Guides in such a way that they can be easily followed, regardless of the experience level of the user.

2) When changes are made to Standard Operating Guides, review changes with all personnel who may be tasked to perform the affected procedures.

3) Provide more training opportunities for all personnel who may be assigned to field monitoring teams so that they are able to better familiarize themselves with field team procedures.

SCHEDULE OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: Successfully redemonstrated.

Appendix A: Improvement Plan 46 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Issue: 23-18-4a3-L2-02 ORO: State of Michigan Field Monitoring Teain 2 Criterion: 4.a.3 CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION: The issue was corrected through retraining of the Field Monitoring Team-2 members on the measurement of airborne radioiodine and particulates, and re-demonstration of the criteria.

REP ASSESSMENT AREA: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

Environmental Response/Health and Safety CORE CAPABILITY ELEMENT: AGENCYPOC:

Field Team Measurement and Analysis ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

NIA Appendix A: Improvement Plan 47 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Issue: 23-18-5al-L2-01 ORO: Monroe County EOC Criterion: 5.a.1 CONDITION: The Monroe County EOC personnel did not demonstrate familiarity with the Monroe County Nuclear Power Plant Public Warning and Notification Procedures (June 2018 rev A).

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Possible lack of pertinent training on expectations for siren system activation and tone alert radio messaging in regards to an incident at FNPP. Lack of the proper procedures available in the Communications Room of the EOC.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.5, 6, 7 and Monroe County Nuclear Power Plant Public Warning and Notification Procedures (June 2018 rev A).

POTENTIAL EFFECT: Failure to effectively disseminate EAS message to entire public.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendations For Improvement:

1) EMA work with Dispatch Center Supervisor(s) or Dispatch Center for clarification of expectations as to who will activate the siren system (per the plan either EMA or Dispatchers can activate the siren system) and tone alert radio activation and messaging (as they should be transmitting the EAS message via radios per the procedure).

2) Have the Enrico Fermi Siren Activation Procedure available in the BOC Communications Room as they do in Dispa!ch.

3) In regard to tone alert radio activation, consider a predetermined patched group or at least provide guidance on which tone alert radio recipients should be patched together to receive the alert and message.

4) Consider annual REP Training (REP basics, ECLs, siren activation, siren testing, backup siren activation procedures, tone alert radio activation and message transmission) be added to annual Dispatcher training program.

SCHEDULE OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: Successfully redemonstrated.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

As a corrective action, tp.e Controller conducted training and provided the expectations of the siren system activation and notification process to the personnel involved. During the second alert and notification sequence, the dispatchers disseminated the EAS message to the entire public.

The Level 2 Finding was closed as the corrective action was effective and the alert and notification sequence was successfully redemonstrated.

Appendix A: Improvement Plan 48 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

. UNCU\SSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Issue: 23-18-5al-L2-01 ORO: Monroe County EOC Criterion: 5.a.1 REP ASSESSMENT AREA: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

Emergency Notification and Public Information CORE CAPABILITY ELEMENT: AGENCYPOC:

Public Information and Warning, Operational Coordination, Operational Communications ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

NIA Appendix A: Improvement Plan 49 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Plan Issue: 23-18-4a3-P-01 ORO:State of Michigan Field Team 1 Criterion: 4.a.3 CONDITION: The Standard Operating Guide (SOG) for Field Monitoring Teams procedure for air sampling require that an area radiation survey be conducted while the air sample is being collected; however, there is no specification regarding the time(s) within the sampling interval when such measurements should be made.

POSSIBLE CAUSE:

The SOG does not specify that exposure rate measurements should be taken at the beginning, mid-point, and end of the air sampling interval to ensure that the plume is initially present and that it doesn't significantly drift away from the sampling location during the collection interval.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654 / FEMA-REP-1, Planning Standard I, Criteria 1.9 and 1.10 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Field Monitoring Team Standard Operating Guide, May 29,2018 POTENTIAL EFFECT: During the exercise conducted on August 28, 2018, the opert I closed window exposure rate measurement required by page 57, steps 9 and 10 was made at the end of the sampling interval. Although this measurement indicated that the plume was present at that time, there was no assurance that it was present at the time that the sample collection was begun, or had shifted during the sampling period. In addition, had an exposure rate measurement been performed immediately prior to air sample collection and it showed no difference between the window open and window closed results, it would mean that direct radiation ("shine") from the plume was present and not the plume itself. Hence, an air sample collected under those conditions would have no value.

RECOMMENDATION:

Add a requirement to the air sampling procedure in the Field Monitoring Team SOG to perform a window open/ window closed exposure rate measurement at 3 feet above ground immediately prior to, at mid-point, and at end of air sample collection interval. The team should notify the Field Team Center Coordinator if exposure rates vary significantly during the sampling period. Exposure rate variance would indicate the plume has shifted and may render the sample invalid. Ground level exposure rate measurements can be performed if time permits.

SCHEDULE OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

Plans/procedures will be updated and submitted for review prior to the August 2018 DC Cook Ingestion Pathway Exercise.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

Appendix A: Improvement Plan 50 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Plan Issue: 23-18-4a3-P-01 ORO:State of Michigan Field Team 1 Criterion: 4.a.3 REP ASSESSMENT AREA: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

Environmental Response/Health and Safety CORE CAPABILITY ELEMENT: AGENCYPOC:

Field Team Measurement and Analysis ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

Appendix A: Improvement Plan 51 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Plan Issue: 23-18-2al-P-02 ORO: State EOC Incident Management Group Criterion: 2.a.1 CONDITION: The process demonstrated by the State of Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) for upgrading an emergency worker's administrative exposure limit of 1000 mR was informal and not well documented. The process was evaluated through the review of procedures and interview of the Dose Analyst and Health Physicist at the SEOC and personnel at the Field Team Center.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Missing and unclear procedures.

REFERENCE:

NUREG-0654/FEMA- REP-1, C6; J.10, e, f; K.3.a, 4.

EFFECT: Missing and missing procedures could lead to inconsistent handling of EWs approaching the lOOOmR turn-back limit and EWs requesting or queries concerning dose exceedance.

RECOMMENDATION:

The MDEQ should formalize the process used for upgrading an emergency worker's administrative exposure limit in order to ensure that decisions regarding dose exceedance are handled consistently and adhere to best practices.

Specifically:

MDEQ should ensure that the first level supervision of emergency workers in the State and Counties are trained in the process.

The process should be expeditious and documented on a form.

The process should include the following considerations:

The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) exposure philosophy.

Availability of a qualified replacement.

Critical nature of the assignment.

Validity of the dosimeter correction factor (default or calculated).

Ingestion of potassium iodide.

The utilization of respirators.

In addition, it is recommended that the MDEQ method for calculating the dosimeter correction factor, when the isotopic mix in the radiation release is known, should be documented in a procedure.

The process should run full-circle from tracking Emergency Worker exposures incrementally above 1OOmR, to questions/requests regarding dose exceedance, to dose assessment, to health-physics-based decision-making, to communicating decisions back down the chain to the worker/requester.

Appendix A: Improvement Plan 52 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Plan Issue: 23-18-2al-P-02 ORO: State EOC Incident Management Group Criterion: 2.a.1 SCHEDULE OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

Plans/procedures will be updated and submitted for review prior to the August 2018 DC Cook Ingestion Pathway Exercise.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

REP ASSESSMENT AREA: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

Protective Action Decision-Making CORE CAPABILITY ELEMENT: AGENCYPOC:

Operational Coordination; Environmental Response/Health and Safety, Situational Assessment ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

Appendix A: Improvement Plan 53 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program' Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Plan Issue: 23-18-2b2-P-03 ORO: Michigan State EOC Criterion: 2.b2 CONDITION: At 1204 Eastern Daylight Time, after the second PAO was made, the AGR recognized that the map he needed to correctly display the P AAs in the PAO was not in his plans and procedures. The state representatives from Wayne County noted that based on the PAR, they did not have a map in their current Boundary Book (book of 14 maps depicting P AAs) that would capture the recommended evacuated areas. The only map in the Boundary Book that did capture all of the areas, also included PAA 7. The AGR notified the other state staff members, including the GAR, IM, Deputy IM, and the SEOC Manager of the confusion with the maps. The SEOC Manager made contact with the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) team and they located the correct map on their network drive. The GIS team then emailed it to the AGR. Through*the entire process of trying to determine which version of the Boundary Book/maps was being used, the SEOC proceeded with announcing the evacuations of P AAs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, based on the initial PAR from the FNPP, without acknowledging 7, in accordance with their current copy of Boundary Books.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The SEOC did not have of all possible maps in current Boundary Book.

REFERENCE:

NUREG 0654/FEMA-REP-1 D.4, J.9, J.10.m EFFECT: Produced confusion based on PAAs.

RECOMMENDATION:

The State Emergency Operations Center should ensure that current copies of their Boundary Books are available in all the emergency operating facilities support their Radiological Emergency Response procedures.

SCHEDULE OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:

Plans/procedures will be updated and submitted for review prior to the August 2018 DC Cook Ingestion Pathway Exercise.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION:

REP ASSESSMENT AREA: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

Protective Action Decision-Making Appendix A: Improvement Plan 54 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant CORE CAPABILITY ELEMENT: AGENCYPOC:

Operational Coordination, Irttelligence and Information Sharing, Environmental Response/Health and Safety, Operational ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

Communications, Situational Assessment Appendix A: Improvement Plan 55 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant This page is intentionally blank Appendix A: Improvement Plan 56 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX B: Exercise Timeline Time that Notification Was Received or Action Was Taken All times are Eastern Daylight Time IBDT)

Emergency Time Classification Level Utility State of Monroe Wayne Michigan Event or Action Declared Michigan County County JIC SEOC EOC EOC Unusual Event 0805 0813 0812 0812 NIA Alert 0851 0859 0858 0858 NIA Site Area Emergency 0941 0953 1000 1000 NIA General Emergency 1101 1114 1123 1123 1108 Release of Rad Material Started 1058 1114 1123 1123 1109 Release of Rad Material Terminated NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Facility Declared Operational 0951 0942 0930 1033 Declaration of State Emergency 1108 0943 1000 1108 Exercise Terminated 1315 1315 1315 1330 Agricultural Advisory 1001 1010 1010 1041 Water, Air, and Rail Restriction 1131 1159 1200 1127 Early Informational Message: Fermi 2 Notice oflncident 0957 NIA NIA NIA pt Early Precautionary/Protective Action State: (KI Distribution) 0957 1003 1003 1035 2nd Early Precautionary/Protective Action State:

NIA NIA NIA NIA pt Protective Action Recommendation 1117 NIA NIA NIA pt Protective Action Order: Evacuate Protective Action Area: 1,2,3,6 1118 1129 1129 1118 pt Siren Activation: NIA 1135 NIA NIA pt EAS Message: NIA 1141 NIA NIA 2nd Protective Action Recommendation: Evacuate 1204 NIA NIA NIA Protective Action Area: 1,2,3,4,6,7 2nd Protective Action Order: 1206 1219 1220 NIA 2nd Siren Activation: NIA 1230 NIA NIA 2nd EAS Message: NIA 1235 NIA NIA KI Administration Decision: 1115 1123 1134 1132 LEGEND: NIA= ECL/Event/Action Not Applicable at Location -------=Time Not Reported Appendix B: Exercise Timeline 57 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant This page is intentionally blank Appendix B: Exercise Timeline 58 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX C: Exercise Evaluation Team EXERCISE DATES: August 28, 2018 SITE: Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

: ".',;f:: ,, *.*::5jfj),!: ,* 1:',~ 1'-.~ *"'_, .

. k,*::

E~e.rdse' ,_

Man~M.ment t.=~-*'" * ~:f.':. -.. :

Chair, Regional Assistance Committee Sean O'Leary DHS/FEMA Exercise Director Dwaine Warren DHS/FEMA Assistant Exercise Director Stephen Tulley DHS/FEMA Assistant Exercise Director Edward Golinski DHS/FEMA Michigan Site Specialist Katherine Boyce DHS/FEMA Team Leader- State of Michigan Alvin Blake DHS/FEMA Team Leader - Monroe County Todd Gemskie DHS/FEMA Team Leader- Wayne County Jim King DHS/FEMA Contractor Evaluator Support - Regional Coordinator Marcy Campbell ICFI Contractor Administrative Support HaesunJang ICFI

- ~t' :,i~'.~;~ : ----,,- . ,.:

' - );:t:~ ' -** "_?_';:'.;: - *-

":*/~;";, l

. , )c_* - .'

-.1;: - -~~~teA)f~kbJg~~~: '~*'-- ,*x ---

le - --

-- ,-,* ,- --;.--- -.- - ,. - . . . - - t* ~ - - .-- -- . -

~-

~~-

E\r~!tj?te.d Qtf-Site~~es poJ}se. ' Age.ncy/. -

- :_(2lkfg~njz~ti~~s1:to~catiQ~f

, , E~~1uat9fi,~-

.,,, ' ' 'J .' _ ::(;>.\:g!lnij:Y\iol). *,

Cs" < oh *" **'

i

,-.,:" , . *"~-"

Michigan - Initial Notification Point/Michigan Intelligence Carl Bebrich DHS/FEMA Operations Center Michigan - State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) Brett Beardsley DHS/FEMA Michigan - SEOC Carl Bebrich DHS/FEMA Michigan - Incident Management Group Reginald Rodgers ICFI Michigan - Field Team Center - Michigan State Police (MSP)

Marcy Campbell ICFI Monroe Post Michigan - Field Team 1 - MSP Monroe Post Thomas Essig ICFI Michigan - Field Team 2 - MSP Monroe Post Cheryl Weaver ICFI Michigan - Joint Information Center (JIC) Rosemary Samsel ICFI Michigan - JIC Meg Swearingen ICFI Michigan - State Liaison at Monroe County BOC Todd Gemskie DHS/FEMA Michigan - State Liaison at Wayne County BOC Jim King DHS/FEMA Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) FTC Thomas Essig ICFI EW Equipment/Vehicle Mon/Decon - MSP Monroe Post MDEQ FTC EW Mon/Decon - MSP Monroe Post Cheryl Weaver ICFI MDEQ Rep - EW EQUIP/YEH Mon/Decon - Brownstone F .S. #4 David Persaud DHS/FEMA MDEQ Rep - EW Mon/Decon - Brownstone F.S. #4 Reginald Rodgers ICFI Appendix C: Exercise Evaluation Team 59 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCU\SSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Momoe County - Initial Notification Point David Persaud DHS/FEMA Momoe County - Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Mark Dalton ICFI Momoe County - EOC Terry Blackmon ICFI Momoe County - BOC David Persaud DHS/FEMA Momoe County - REP at Joint Information Center Meg Swearingen ICFI Momoe County - Momoe County Emergency Management ICFI P.J. Nied Public Hotline/Rumor Control Momoe County - Traffic and Access Control Point (TACP) ICFI P.J. Nied Dosimetr Brief Momoe County - T ACP Demonstration Terry Blackmon ICFI Momoe County - Dosimetry/Potassium Iodide Stock- Momoe ICFI P.J. Nied Count Health De artment Momo'e County - EV-2 School Interview- Jefferson High School Jim King DHS/FEMA Momoe County - Public Reception/Decon Center/Congregate DHS/FEMA Brian Reinhart Care - Summerfield Hi h School Momoe County - Public Reception/Decon Center/Congregate DHS/FEMA Katherine Boyce Care - Summerfield Hi h School Momoe County - Public Reception/Decon Center/Congregate DHS/FEMA Jim King Care - Summerfield Hi h School Momoe County - Michigan Department of Environmental Quality DHS/FEMA Dwaine Warren MDE Re - Summerfield Hi h School Momoe County - Public Reception/Decon Center/Congregate DHS/FEMA Brian Reinhart Care - Mason Hi h School Momoe County - Public Reception/Decon Center/Congregate DHS/FEMA Katherine Boyce Care - Mason Hi h School Momoe County - Michigan Department of Environmental Quality DHS/FEMA Katherine Boyce E Re - Mason Hi h School Wayne County- Initial Notification Point Ken Wierman DHS/FEMA Wayne County - Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Ken Wierman DHS/FEMA Wayne County - BOC Curtis Williams DHS/FEMA Wayne County - BOC Paul Ringheiser ICFI Wayne County - REP at Joint Information Center Meg Swearingen

ICFI Wayne County - Traffic Access Control Point Demonstration -

Ken Wierman DHS/FEMA Brownstone F.S. #4 Wayne County - Emergency Worker Equipment/Vehicle David Persaud DHS/FEMA Mon/Decon - Brownstone F.S. #4 Wayne County -Emergency Worker Mon/Decon - Brownstone Reginald Rodgers ICFI F.S. #4 Appendix C: Exercise Evaluation Team 60 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX D: Acronyms and Abbreviations

\~,r~a,;z;r'c';.f~:: .. *"" ' 1ri'Ni;;/

,~'z",...... ,:,,,,.. ,

,,. a' ~c,c=c,,=

']~::,,,;,; ,,,,,,, ~\, ~,,,,,,:. .:.:;,:)

AAR After Action Report AGR Attorney General's Representative ANS Alert and Notification System ARC American Red Cross ARES Amateur Radio Emergency Service

ccc Congregate Care Center CERT Community Emergency Response Team CFR Code of Federal Regulations coc Change-of-Custody cpm counts per minute Cs Cesium DCO Dosimetry Control Officer DEQ Department of Environmental Quality DHHS Department of Health and Human Services DHS Department of Homeland Security DO Duty Officer DPS Disaster Preparedness Specialist DRD Direct Reading Dosimeter DRFD Downriver Fire Department EAS Emergency Alert System ECL Emergency Classification Level EDT Eastern Daylight Time EMA Emergency Management Agency EMD Emergency Management Director EMHSD Emergency Management Homeland Security Division EMT Emergency Medical Team EOC Emergency Operation Center EOF Emergency Operations Facility EPZ Emergency Planning Zone EV-2 Reference to FEMA REP Guidance Memorandum- GM EV-2, Protective Actions for School Children, November 13, 1986 EW Emergency Worker EWDC Emergency Worker Decontamination Center EWMD Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination FA Facility Administrator FD Fire Department FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FMT Field Monitoring Team FNPP Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Appendix D: Acronyms and Abbreviations 61 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant 11;1~1,s:1,.:cc,ro*, .,,"'""'. (0; ,,/tc/. ~~~{:(f,;)t:::~:3'.f ;c;';'~i'i:J:f~;~:,~\Lj:~i$~,;cKHi ***.,. ,,..,.,,~ *;'71,t\';f~t1'?tt'~:~;,;*; ;)7y.;4,' 7 ~7'~~

FT Field Team FTC Fermi Transportation Center/Field Team Center FTCC Field Team Center Coordinator g gram(s)

GAR Governor's Authorized Representative GE General Emergency GIS Geographical Information System GM Geiger Mueller gpm gallons per minute HEMS Health Emergency Medical System HSEMD Homeland Security and Emergency Management Division HVCW Health, Veterans and Community Wellness IM Incident Manager IPAWS Integrated Public Alert and Warning System IT Information Technology IWP Initial Warning Point JIC Joint Information Center JPIC Joint Public Information Center JIT Joint Information Team KI Potassium Iodide KV KiloVolts LEIN Law Enforcement Information Network MARCS Multi-Agency Radio Communications System MCANS Monroe County Alert Notification System MCCA Monroe County Commission on Aging MCCD Monroe County Central Dispatch MCSO Monroe County Sheriffs Office MDARD Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development DEQ Michigan Department of Environmental Quality MDHSS Michigan Department of Health and Human Services

µCi/ml micro (10-6) Curies per milliliter mg milligram MHz Megahertz MIOC Michigan Intelligence Operations Center min minute(s)

MOSA Michigan Office of the Services to the Aging MPD Monroe Police Department MPH/mph miles per hour

µR micro (10-6) R/micro Roentgen MSP Michigan State Police NARS Nuclear Accident Reporting System NFEMP Nuclear Facilities Emergency Management Plan Appendix D: Acronyms and Abbreviations 62 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

~:Jff"'#* ,,~...:;.= .*,,1_;.a,<.l,f.l:.~":.{ ~;?:

,;,;1,.A'.\.: . ..., ,} :*:ifJ'.~~';,;,z:~s;:~;<<:;:,,,, I5':;J'Jef ~i°, ,:::;i '.,J,)!!}~,~'J,<JK "" 0

,,,,;;t:f;;}:;J '.:: J:? ,lzf+/-l:: *,_*,c-;g):,."f

,;l l;,:tv' ;; Jt:

\

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPENF Nuclear Plant Event Notification Form NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission OBE Operating-Basis Earthquake oc Operations Section Chief oos Out-of-Sequence ORO Offsite Response Organizations OSLD Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter PAA Protective Action Area PAD Protective Action Decision PAG Protective Action Guidelines PAO Protective Action Order PAR Protective Action Recommendation PDAFN Persons with Disabilities and Access/Functional Needs PIO Public Information Officer PPB Personal Protective Equipment ppm parts per million PRD Permanent Record Dosimeter R Roentgen RAC Regional Assistance Committee RACES Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service RADEF Radiological Defense RADPRO/RadPro Radiological Protection Officer RC Reception Center RCS Reactor Containment System RDL Radiological Decontamination Leader rem radiation exposure man REP Radiological Emergency Preparedness RERP Radiological Emergency Response Plan RESA Regional Education Services Agency RIMC Radiological Instrumentation, Maintenance and Calibration RTS Radiation Technical Specialist SAE Site Area Emergency SDEM State Director of Emergency Management

'SEOC State Emergency Operations Center SITREP Situation Report SLRCS Supplementary Leak Collection and Release System SOG Standard Operating Guideline SOP *Standard Operating Procedure soo School Operations Officer sso School Services Officer TACP Traffic and Access Control Point Appendix D: Acronyms and Abbreviations 63 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

\~tJ;)~:4 ,*, "" m,J,;':: "' ,,,,.,et I, ,.::,;:;::/~;]f***-='C'.:~2i;:J;~?

,, ** :r: ,1 IS\',?!~£f'l~)!i~:t'.t:;:J;\l7s"& r. OM ,;.,,t]~S~

TEDE Total Effective Dose Equivalent TLD Thermoluminescent Dosimeter TSG Technical Support Group UE Unusual Event UHF Ultra-High Frequency VHF Very High Frequency VOIP Voice Over Internet Protocol WC Wayne County wccc Wayne County Community College WDC Worker Decontamination Center Appendix D: Acronyms and Abbreviations 64 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX E: Extent-of-Play Agreements Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant State of Michigan, Monroe County, and Wayne County.

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Full-Participation Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise

August 28, 2018 Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 65 State of Michigan, Monroe Coun1;y, Wayne Coun1;y FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Fermi 2 REP Exercise Objectives August 28, 2018 Extent of Play Agreements for Monroe County, Wayne County and the State of Michigan Criteria:

Criteria that will be demonstrated during this exercise and can be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, include the following:

3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.2, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 6.a.1, 6.b.1, 6.c.1, 6.d.1 Criteria that may be re-demonstrated, as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Regional Assistance Committee, include the following: 2.a.1, 2.b.1, 2.b.2, 5.a.1, 5.b.1 Criteria that are not evaluated for this exercise include the following: 2.d.1, 2,e.1, 3.e.1, 3.e.2, 3.f.1, 4.b.1, 4.c.1, 5.a.3, 5.a.4 Evaluation Area 1 - Emergency Operations Management Criterion 1.a.1: Offsite Response Organizations (OROs) use effective procedures to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency personnel and activate facilities in a timely manner.

State of Michigan

1. The State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC), MSP Operations and Field Team Center (FTC) will be fully activated. State personnel reporting to the SEOC will be mobilized in accordance with procedures.

2. State personnel reporting to the county Emergency Operation Center (EOC) will be pre-positioned and will report when mobilized by the SEOC.

3. State personnel reporting to the FTC will be pre-positioned and will begin exercise participation at the time determined by the scenario and controller injects.

4. The Worker Decontamination Center (WDC) will be demonstrated out of sequence on Monday, August 27h, 2018, at 2:00 pm. Personnel reporting to the WDC will be pre-positioned and will begin participation at the direction of the controller.

5. State _personnel reporting to the Joint Information *center (JIC) will be pre-positioned and will begin participation after the arrival of Monroe and Wayne Counties' JIC personnel.

6. State personnel involved in out-of-sequence demonstrations will be pre-staged.

7. A roster will be provided to demonstrate 24-hour staffing.

Monroe County

1. The Monroe County EOC will be activated and mobilized in accordance with procedures.

2. Monroe County JIC personnel will be mobilized in accordance with procedures.

3. All personnel involved in out-of-sequence demonstrations will be pre-positioned.

4. A roster will be provided to demonstrate 24-hour staffing of the county EOC.

Wayne County

1. The Wayne County EOC will be activated and mobilized in accordance with procedures.

2. Wayne County JIC personnel will be mobilized in accordance with procedures.

3. All personnel involved in out-of-sequence demonstrations will be pre-positioned.

4. A roster will be provided to demonstrate 24-hour staffing of the county EOC.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 66 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Criterion 1.b.1: Facilities are sufficient to support the emergency response.

State of Michigan

1. The SEOC and is maintained in operational readiness and set up will not be demonstrated. The state was evaluated in 2017 due in 2024.

2. The JIC and is maintained in operational readiness and set up will not be demonstrated.

The state was evaluated in 2014 due in 2022.

Monroe County

1. The EOC is maintained in operational readiness and set up will not be demonstrated.

Monroe County was evaluated in 2014 due in 2022.

Wayne County

1. The EOC is maintained in operational readiness and set up will not be demonstrated.

Wayne County was evaluated in 2015 due in 2023.

Criterion 1.c.1: Key personnel with leadership roles for the ORO provide direction and control to that part of the overall response effort for which they are responsible.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by state personnel at the SEOC, by State Liaison Officers at county EOCs, and state personnel at the FTC, FMTs, WDC, and the JIC.

Monroe County

1. This criterion will be demonstrated at the county EOC, JIC, Congregate Care and Public Reception Monitoring and Decontamination Centers.

Wayne County

1. This criterion will be demonstrated at the county EOC, JIC, and Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Center.

Criterion 1.d.1: At least two communication systems are available, at least one operates properly, and communication links are established and maintained with appropriate locations.

Communications capabilities are managed in support of emergency operations.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the SEOC, FTC, FMTs, WDC, JIC. If both the primary and back-up systems fail, this objective may be demonstrated by successful use of an alternate method of communication.

Monroe County ,

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the EOC, JIC, Public Reception Decontamination Center, Congregate Care and Access Control. If both the primary and back-up systems fail, this objective may be demonstrated by successful use of an alternate method of communication.

Wayne County Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 67 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the EOC, JIC, Emergency Worker .

Decontamination Center, and Access Control. If both the primary and back-up systems fail, this objective may be demonstrated by successful use of an alternate method of communication.* -

Criterion 1.e.1: Equipment,. maps, displays monitoring instruments, dosimetry, potassium iodide (Kl), and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations.

State of Michigan

1. Equipment, maps, displays, and other supplies will be demonstrated to support emergency operations at the SEOC, FTC, FMTs, WDC, JIC, State Liaison Officers at County EOCs, and out-of-sequence events.

2. Additional supplies of potassium iodide are stored at the Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division (MSP/EMHSD) office in Dimondale. These supplies are meant to augment the county supplies.

3. Calibration records will .be provided for equipment calibrated by DEQ for the current calendar year.

4. Additional monitoring instruments are stored at the Department of Environmental Quality facility located on Fill.ey Street in Lansing.

Monroe County

1. Equipment, maps, displays, and other supplies will be demonstrated to suppo.rt emergency operations at the EOC, JIC and out-of-sequence events.

2. Personnel involved in traffic and access control points will demonstrate knowledge of where to secure traffic control equipment.

3. Potassium iodide and dosimeters are stored at the county.

Wayne County

1. Equipment, maps, displays, and other supplies will be demonstrated to support emergency operations at the EOC, JIC and out-of-sequence events.

2. Personnel involved in traffic and access control points will demonstrate knowledge of where to secure traffic control equipment at the Emergency Worker Decontamination Center.

3. Potassium ioaide and dosimeters are stored at the county.

Evaluation Area 2 - Protective Action Decision Making Criterion 2.a.1: OROs use a decision-making process, considering relevant factors and appropriate coordination, to ensure that an*exposure control system, including the use of Kl, is in place for emergency workers, including provisions to authorize radiation exposure in excess of administrative limits or Protective Action Guides.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the Incident Management Group in the SEOC in conjunction with appropriate support staff including the Technical Support Unit (TSU) and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS).

2. Authorization for State personnel to exceed state exposure limits will be demonstrated by the State Health Physicist. If the scenario does not provide an opportunity to demonstrate these items, this will be demonstrated through an interview at a time that will not interfere with exercise play to demonstrate the ability to perform these actions.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 68 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Monroe County - Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Monroe County may recommend that emergency workers ingest Kl and/or authorize emergency workers to exceed State exposure limits based on best available information, if the incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants, and if the State is unable to provide Protective A~tions Orders to protect emergency workers in a timely manner.

2. Any decision regarding the implementation of protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration by an agency with authority to warn and protect the public in a timely manner will be documented as an "Interim Protective Measures Decision" in lieu of a "Protective Action Decision."

Wayne County - Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Wayne County may recommend that emergency workers ingest Kl and/or authorize emergency workers to exceed State exposure limits based on best available information, if the incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants, and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to protect emergency workers in a timely manner.

2. Any decision regarding the implementation of protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration by an agency with authority to warn and protect the public in a timely manner will be documented as an "Interim Protective Measures Decision" in lieu of a "Protective Action Decision."

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairperson of the Regional Assistance Committee.

Criterion 2.b.1: Appropriate Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) are based on available information on plant condition, field monitoring data, and licensee and ORO dose projections, as well as knowledge of onsite and offsite environmental conditions.

State of Michigan

1. The Technical Support Unit (TSU) in the SEOC will evaluate licensee and FTC provided information and complete an independent analysis of scenario data.

2. Dose assessment will be conducted as required by the scenario at the SEOC.

Monroe County - Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Monroe County may implement protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration to warn and protect the public based on best available information if the incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to warn and protect the public in a timely manner.

Wayne County - Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Wayne County may implement protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration to warn and protect the public based on best available information if the incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to warn and protect the public in a timely manner.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairman of the Regional Assistance Committee; Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 69 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Criterion 2.b.2: A decision-making process involving consideration of appropriate factors and necessary coordination is used to make Protective Action Decisions (PADs) for the general public (including the recommendation for the use of Kl, if it is ORO policy).

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the Incident Management Group in the SEOC in conjunction with appropriate support staff including the TSU and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS).

2. The Potassium Iodide (Kl) policy will be demonstrated at the General Emergency declaration through SEOC discussion and a press release at the JIC.

Monroe County This criterion will not be demonstrated by the County.

Wayne County This criterion will not be demonstrated by the County.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairman of the Regional Assistance Committee.

Criterion 2.c.1: Protective Action Decisions are made, as appropriate, for groups of people with disabilities and those with access/functional needs.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the Incident Management Group and TSU in the SEOC in coordination with applicable support staff, through the decision to recommend the use of Kl to institutionalized persons that cannot be evacuated.

Monroe County - Does not apply unless* situation warrants immediate action.

1. Monroe County may implement protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration to warn and protect the public based on best available information if the incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to warn and protect the public in a timely manner.

Wayne County- Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Wayne County may implement protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration to warn and protect the public based on best available information if the incident

. (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to warn and protect the public in a timely manner.

Criterion 2.d.1: Radiological consequences for the ingestion pathway are assessed and

_ appropriate Protective Action Decisions are made based on the ORO planning criteria.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 70 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Crite-rion 2.e.1: Timely post-plume relocation, reentry, and return decisions are made and coordinated as appropriate, based on assessments of the radiological conditions and criteria in the ORO's plan and/or procedures.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Evaluation Area 3 - Protective Action Implementation Criterion 3.a.1: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, Kl, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plan and procedures.

Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the reading~ on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of Kl for emergency workers is maintained.

State of Michigan

1. The State of Michigan will demonstrate this criterion through Radiological Emergency Worker briefing(s) and interview(s) at the FTC, FMTs and WDC.

2. Radiological Emergency Worker/ Equipment Monitoring and Decontamination procedures will be demonstrated by the WDC personnel at the WDC.

3. Decontamination demonstrations, through out-of-sequence activities on Monday, August 27th, 2018 at 2:00 pm at Monroe MSP Post #28, 300 Jones Ave., Monroe, Ml. This will include full equipment set-up, simulated decontamination actions and/or interview(s) as appropriate, but no water or decontamination solutions will be used during the demonstration.

Monroe County

1. Monroe County will demonstrate this criterion at the access control point when emergency workers are issued dosimeters at the local EOG.

2. Monroe County will demonstrate this criterion through out of sequence activities at Summerfield High School Decontamination Center on Tuesday, June 25th, 6:00 pm and Mason High School Decontamination Center Wednesday, June 27th, 6:00 pm.

Wayne County

1. Wayne County will demonstrate this criterion at the access control point when emergency workers are issued dosimeters at Emergency Worker Decontamination Center.

Criterion 3.b.1: Kl and appropriate instructions are available in case a decision to recommend use of Kl is made. Appropriate record keeping of the administration of Kl for institutionalized individuals and general public is maintained.

State of Michigan

1. The State will demonstrate this objective at the SEOC and through decision-making and directives to implement appropriate Protective Action Orders.

Monroe County Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 71 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFil;:D Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

1. Monroe County will demonstrate the ability (simulate) to administer Kl to institutionalized individuals.

Wayne County

1. Wayne County will demonstrate the ability (simulate) to administer Kl to institutionalized individuals.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for c;redit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Criterion 3.c.1: Protective Action Decisions (PADs) are implemented for people with disabilities and those with access/functional needs other than schools within areas subject to protective actions.

State of Michigan This criterion will not be demonstrated by the State.

Monroe County

1. This criterion will be. demonstrated in the EOG via staff discussions that may include evacuation of hospitals,* nursing homes, correctional facilities, mobility impaired individuals, and transportation dependent. These discussions will be documented in situation logs.

2. Actual contacts to special population groups will not be made. Simulation of calls will be logged as such. *

3. Monroe County will contact a minimum of four providers of transportation services, which may include public transit authorities, school systems for buses, ambulance services, or fire/rescue services.

Wayne County

1. This criterion will be demonstrated in the EOG via staff discussions that may include evacuation of hospitals, nursing homes, correctional facilities, mobility impaired individuals, and transportation dependent. These discussions will be documented in situation logs.

2. Actual contacts to special population groups will not be made. Simulation of calls will be logged as such.

3. Wayne County will contact a minimum of four providers of transportation services, which may include public transit authorities, school systems for buses, ambulance services, or fire/rescue services.

Criterion 3.c.2: OROs/School officials implement protective actions for schools.

State of Michigan

This criterion does not apply.

Monroe County

1. This criterion will *be demonstrated by Monroe County EOC as driven by the scenario.

2. An EV-2 interview will be conducted out-of-sequence at Jefferson School District, 2400 North Dixie Hwy, Monroe, Ml 48162 on June 26, 2018, at 10:00 am.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 72 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

3. Refer to the Table of Exercise Demonstrations for specific times. This will be conducted out-of-sequence.

Wayne County

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by Wayne County EOC as driven by the scenario.

2. An EV-2 interview will be conducted out-of-sequence at Gibralter School on November 30, 2018, at 10:00am.

3. Refer to the Table of Exercise Demonstrations for specific times. This will be conducted out-of-sequence.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Criterion 3.d.1: Appropriat~ traffic and access control is established. Accurate instructions are provided to traffic and access control personnel.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the SEOC through the restriction of air, interstate, rail, and waterway access.

Monroe County

1. Decisions related to traffic and access control will be demonstrated in the Monroe County EOC. Monroe County demonstration locations will be determined during the exercise at a time agreed upon by the FEMA evaluator, the Exercise Controller, and the county Emergency Management Coordinator.

2. Staffing of all other access and traffic control points will be simulated.

Wayne County

1. Decisions related to traffic and access control will be demonstrated in the Wayne County EOC and the Emergency Worker Decontamination Center. Wayne County demonstration locations will be determined during the exercise at a time agreed upon by the FEMA evaluator, the Exercise Controller, and the county Emergency Management Coordinator.

2. Staffing of all other access and traffic control points will be simulated.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Criterion 3.d.2: Impediments to evacuation are identified and resolved.

State of Michigan This criterion does not apply Monroe County

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 73 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY .

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

1. This will be demonstrated through discussions at the county EOG. Messages will be injected by Exercise Controllers to drive these demonstrations. Personnel will deal with the impediments by discussing the need for equipment, discussing its estimated time of arrival, etc. If the impediment posed involves road closures that would have been known to exercise participants during the course of normal operations, this information will be provided to the players as part of the initial conditions for the exercise. All contacts, actual or' simulated will be logged. Information will be provided to the JIG for each

impediment.

Wayne County

1. This will be demonstrated through discussions at the county EOG. Messages will be injected by Exercise Controllers to drive these demonstrations. Personnel will deal with the impediments by discussing the need for equipment, discussing its estimated time of arrival, etc. If the impediment posed involves road closures that would have been known to exercise participants during the course of normal operations, this-information will be provided to the players as part of the initial conditions for the exercise. All contacts, actuar or simulated will be logged. Information will be provided to the JIG for each impediment.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Criterion 3.e.1: The ORO demonstrates the availability and appropriate use of adequate information regarding water, food supplies, milk, and agricultural production within the ingestion exposure pathway emergency planning zone for implementation of protective actions.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Criterion 3.e.2: Appropriate measures, strategies, and pre-printed instructional material are developed for implementing Protective Action Decisions for contaminated water, food products, milk, and agricultural production.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Criterion 3.f.1: Decisions regarding controlled reentry, relocation, and return of individuals during the post-plume phase are coordinated with appropriate organizations and implemented.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Evaluation Area 4 - Field Measurement and Analysis Criterion 4.a.1: (RESERVED)

Criterion 4.a.2: Field teams (two or more) are managed to obtain sufficient information to help characterize the release and to control radiation exposure.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the FMTs.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 74 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED

~adiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Monroe County and Wayne County This criterion does not apply.

Criterion 4.a.3: Ambient radiation measurements are made and recorded at appropriate locations, and radioiodine and particulate samples are collected. Teams will move to an appropriate low background location to determine whether any significant (as specified in the plan and/or procedures) amount of radioactivity has been collected on the sampling media.

State of Michigan

1. Two State teams will demonstrate the capability to take ambient radiation measurements-of a (simulated) airborne plume. Will demonstrate the collection of an air sample followed by the measurement of the sample in a low background area. Radiological readings will be simulated and uploaded to the RadResponder website. Back-up methods will be used if necessary. *

2. Charcoal or silver zeolite cartridges may be used for air sampling.

3. Donning and doffing PPE will be not be demonstrated by FMTs. Donning and doffing will be demonstrated by one emergency worker at the WDC.

Monroe County and Wayne County This criterion does not apply.

Criterion 4.b.1: The field teams (two or more) demonstrate the capability to make appropriate measurements and to collect appropriate samples (e.g., food crops, milk, water, vegetation, and soil) to support adequate assessments and protective action decision-making.

State of Michigan This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise .

.Criterion 4.c.1: The laboratory is capable of performing required radiological analyses to support protective action decisions.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Evaluation Area 5 - Emergency Notification and Public Information Criterion 5.a.1: Activities associated with primary alerting and notification of the public are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. The initial instructional message to the public must include as a minimum the elements required by current FEMA REP guidance.

State of Michigan

1. The State will provide information

\

to the county for release in the Emergency Alert System messages.

Monroe County

1. Monroe County is the primary activation point for the public warning sirens. Monroe County also activates the Emergency Alert System (EAS) using IPAWS. FEMA Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 75 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant evaluator will confirm message was received at FEMA IPAWS lab any time after message was sent..

Wayne County

1. Wayne Countywill provide, as needed, information to Monroe County for incltJsion in EAS messages.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairman of the Regional Assistance Committee.

Criterion 5.a.2: [RESERVED]

Criterion 5.a.3: Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within a reasonable time following detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notification system.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Criterion 5.a.4: Activities associated with FEMA approved exception areas (where applicable) are completed within 45 minutes following the initial decision by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation The Fermi 2 Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) does not contain any DHS/FEMA approved exception areas.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Criterion 5.b.1: OROs provide accurate subsequent emergency information and instructions to the public and the news media in a timely manner.

State of Michigan, Monroe County and Wayne County

1. This will be demonstrated at the JIC via dissemination of emergency information and instructions through joint media briefings and news release announcements in coordination with the SEOC and County EOCs. All media briefings will be conducted at the JIC. **

2. A public inquiry hotline will be operated by Monroe County during the exercise by personnel based at the Monroe County Emergency Management Office. Trending is performed by the Rumor Control Coordinator, who identifies trends and ensures appropriate information is provided to the public inquiry operators and the JIC for inclusion in press briefings Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairman of the Regional Assistance Committee.

Evaluation Area 6 - Support Operation/Facilities Criterion 6.a.1: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 76 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant State of Michigan

1. State personnel will provide phone assistance as requested by the counties per the procedures in the Nuclear Facilities Emergency Management Plan during county Public Reception/Emergency Worker decontamination center demonstrations. Phone calls may be simulated through discussions with State personnel who are available in person for the out-of-sequence demonstrations.

Monroe County

1. Monroe County will demonstrate separate public reception/decontamination

center out-of-sequence: Tuesday, June 26 at 6:00 pm, Summerfield High School, and Wednesday, June 27 at 6:00 pm at Mason High School.

2. The capability to monitor 20% of the population in the 10-mi EPZ over a 12 hour1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months period will be demonstrated. To meet this objective a facility must be able to monitor, on average, 3.3 people per minute. Six (simulated) evacuees will be monitored. One portal monitor will be set up to process the evacuees. One person will be_contaminated (simulated).

3. Dosimetry and survey instrument calib,ration and maintenance records will be evaluated as described under Criterion 1.e.1.

4. The process for setting up the Center will not be evaluated. Set-up will occur and conclude in a reasonable time. Evaluators will observe but not interfere with the set up process at the Center prior to the beginning of the evaluated demonstration.

5. A Radiological Worker Break area will be demonstrated through discussion and will not be required to be set up. Workers will be allowed to eat and drink during the center setup period, prior to demonstration of operations. Workers may use restrooms freely during center set-up and' operation.

6. Decontamination of the public and vehicles will not be demonstrated, vehicles will be parked if contaminated.

Wayne County This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Criterion 6.b.1: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated at the State's WDC, out-of-sequence on Monday, August 271h, 2018.

2. At least two radiological emergency workers and two emergency vehicles will be monitored and at least one radiological emergency worker and one emergency vehicle will be identified as contaminated and processed in accordance with the controller injects and procedures. (Note: The two workers and one vehicle may be cycled through the stations multiple times to meet demonstration objectives.)

3. Decontamination demonstrations will include full equipment set-up, simulated decontamination actions and/or interview(s) as appropriate, but no water or decontamination solutions will be used during the demonstration.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 77 State of Michigan, Monroe Councy, Wayne Councy FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant

4. One emergency worker will demonstrate donning and doffing PPE but will not be required to wear for the duration of the evaluation ..

Monroe County This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Wayne County

1. Wayne County will demonstrate the emergency worker decontamination center out-of-sequence with the exercise at Brownstown Township Fire Station 4, Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 1:00 pm.

2. At least two radiological emergency workers and two emergency vehicles will be monitored and at least one radiological emergency worker and one emergency vehicle will be identified as contaminated and processed in accordance with the controller injects and procedures. (Note: The two workers and one vehicle may be cycled through the stations multiple times to meet demonstration objectives.)

3. A Radiological Emergency Worker Break Area will be demonstrated through discussion only. Workers may eat and drink during the unevaluated setup and may use restrooms freely during center set-up and operation.

4. Decontamination demonstrations will include full equipment set-up, simulated decontamination actions and/or interview(s) as appropriate, but no wate*r or decontamination solutions will be used during the demonstration.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Note: The dec(!ntamination and washing of vehicles arid individuals, if detailed in the county plans, will be simulated.

Criterion 6.c.1: Managers of congregate care facilities demonstrate that the centers have resources to provide services and accommodations consistent with American Red Cross planning guidelines. Managers demonstrate the procedures to assure that evacuees have been monitored for contamination and have been decontaminated as appropriate prior to entering congregate care facilities.

State of Michigan This criterion does not apply.

Monroe County

1. Monroe County will demonstrate a congregate care center out-of-sequence with the exercise on Tuesday, June 26, 2108 at 6:00 pm at Summerfield High School and Wednesday, June 27, 2018 at 6:00 pm at Mason High School. Personnel operating the center will not go through alert, mobilization, activation, or shift changes. Appropriate 24/7 staffing will be demonstrated via personnel rosters, call-up lists, etc.

Wayne County This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 78 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Criterion 6.d.1: The facility/ORO has the appropriate space, ~dequate resources, and trained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination, and medical services to contaminated injured individuals.

State of Michigan During this exercise State Technical Personnel will provide phone support upon request. Phone calls may be simulated through discussions with State personnel who are available in person for the out-of-sequence demonstrations.

Monroe County Note: This criterion will be demonstrated during an MS-1 Drill Date TBD fall 2018, with Promedica Hospital located at 718 North Macomb Street, Monroe, Ml 48161.

Wayne County Note: This criterion will be demonstrated during an MS-1 Drill on November 29, 2018, at 9:00 am with Beaumont Hospital-Trenton, South Shore Campus Medical Center located at 5450 Fort Street, Trenton, Ml 48183 out-of-sequence.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 79 State of Michigan, Monroe Coun1y, Wayne Coun1y FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant This page is intentionally blank Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 80 State of Michigan, Monroe Coun1y, Wayne. Coun1y FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Ra diological Emergen cy Prep aredness (REP) Progr am Draft After Ac tion Report/Improvem ent Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX F: On-Site/Off-Site Scenario FERMI 2, 2018 fXEAClS SCfNARIO Event #1- At 0820, Notification Unusual Event ECL declared (EAL SU5.1), Seal failure in Recirculation pump B causes leak into drywell above 25 gpm.

Event #2- At 0850, ALERT ECL declared (EAL FAl. l), drywell pressure above 1.68 psig indicating loss of Reactor Coolant fission product barrier.

Event #3- At 0955, SITE AREA ECL declared (EAL FSl.l), containment radiation monitors read greater than 2250 R/hr indicting loss of fuel clad barrier in addition to the earlier loss of the reactor coolant barrier.

Event #4- At 1055, instrument line into the Torus breaks causing radiation release to the secondary containment and out to the environment indicating loss of reactor containment barrier in addition to earlier loss of the other two fission product ban-iers.

Prepared for DHS, FEMA Region 5 by R. C. Rodgers ICFI Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 8 1 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayn e County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant EVENT #5 At 1110, GENERAL EMERGENCY ECL declared (EAL FG 1.1 ), initial PAR from Fermi Evacuate Areas 1, 2, 3 and clear lake Area 6.

EVENT #6- At 1155, expanded PAR Evacuate Area 4. As the release rate increases and a dose projection indicates EPA P AG for the thyroid exceeded beyond 5 miles.

EVENT #7- At 1315, predicted end of exercise From 1115 to 1215, the Field monitoring teams will see increasing closed window readings out to 7 miles. Readings will be as high as 360 mR/hr at 1.5 miles and 70 mR/hr at 7 miles.

Significant levels of iodine will also be measured on the iodine cartridge.

Timeline of Key Events.

KEY EVENTS TIME*

START OF EXERCISE 0700 REACTOR SHUTDOWN 0810 Event #1 UNUSUAL EVENT declared (EAL SU 5.1) 0820**

Event #2 ALERT declared (EAL FA 1.1) 0850**

Event #3 SITE AREA EMERGERNCY (FS 1.1) declared 0955**

Event #4 RADIOLOGICAL RELEASE FROM THE REACTOR 1055 BUILDING COMMENCED (monitored & filtered)

Event #5 GENERAL EMERGENCY declaration (EAL FG 1.1) 1110**

Fermi PAR- evacuate Areas 1, 2, 3 and clear lake Area 6, recommend administer KI to the public.

Event #6 UPGRADE PAR. Fermi dose projection exceeds thyroid 1155 PAG at 5 miles, Fermi PAR evacuate Area 4 Event #7 END OF PLUME EXERCISE if all objectives are met. 1315 Radiological release was ongoing.

Clock Times in scenario are approximate; **No later than.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 82 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

0

'"1

~

(1)

'"1

~

Fermi 2 August 28, 2018 P-.

0 Off-site Exercise Scenario Timeline ::i

.. .. l

. Jime 0700 .

I. !=vents Initial conditions J *--" : SEQ~ A~i{>ns.. .. ; lll)onro_e ~ou!ltY Actions I vyayne County Actions Jl9f.~ions ! FT9Action_s 0

'"1 rt-

§'

0820 . provided to SCR.

Conditions met for an 'O

~

p.

. Unusual Event (SU 5.1) 0

'"1 o*

0850 Conditions met for ~ 0 Alert (FA-1.1 ). 8 l)Qo*

-0850 . Local & state . MSP Operations notified by . Dispatch notifies EM & . Dispatch notifies EM & . JIC activation begun.

(1)

i rt- e?..

. notifications made.

OSC, TSC, EOF, and . plant.

MSP Operations notifies .. Chairperson.

EOC activation begun. .. Chairperson.

EOC activation begun.

(SEOC controller inject if necessary) . FTC is activated for

g

§ '"1~ (1)

. ENC activated. MSP/EMHSD and Personnel dispatched to Personnel dispatched to Utility personnel will exercise. (SEOC

~c 15 minute notification MDEQ/DWRPS. JIC JIC not demonstrate A/N controller inject if

i z update established. SEOC activation begun .

MSP Operations notifies Monroe and Wayne

. or facility setup.

Monroe and Wayne Counties JIC necessary)

,Q

'1:1~

n

'"1 Ul

. Counties.

Activation of JIG and FTC personnel will be mobilized in

.g e; ,;

Ul

. begun.

SEOC notifies FEMA, Ontario and Ohio. .

accordance with procedures.

State JIG personnel (1) p.m

i 0 (1)

(/)

will be pre-positioned. (/)

~

-0930 . Hotline established to . SEOC will be declared . EOC activation . EOG activation ~

. SEOC.

TSC&OSC operational. .

operational at about this time.

Governor may declare state

. underway.

Hotline opened to SEOC. . underway.

Hotline opened to SEOC.

~

. of Emergency/Disaster

Hotlines opened to plant and ~ s

'"1

. county.

Plant instructed to terminate notifications to Monroe and

§.

Iv Wayne Counties.

~

z

Notifications to counties via ()

SEOC. 0 e;

'1:1

~

'"1

g

§rt-

CJ

'i

~

(1)

'i is"

~-

0

i Fermi 2 August 28, 2018 Off-site Exercise Scenario Timeline l 0

'i

§' :,:I

.. i . " ll)

--~~Tir!JI! .

0955 .

L* ~ *',Events Criteria met for Site Area Emergency (FS

. : ;*SEGC A,:ctiRl]S _. t ~.Mo!1ioe ~ou_n_ty Acticms_ I vyayrie County Actions I

JIC Actions- .

'*"j FTC Actions I 'd

'i 0

(1) e:

§-

(IQ 1.1) 8 (1) ('5'

-1010 . Plant notifies SEOC . Notifications to counties via .. EOG operational

.. . . FTC operational

i

...... e?..

~

within 15 minutes.

. .SEOC.

If not done previously.

declare State of Emergency/ .

Siren System and iPaws station placed on standby Reception Oecon &

EOG operational Reception Decon &

Congregate Care Centers County personnel arrive at JIG (SEOC controller inject if necessary)

Communications i ~c (1)

'i z

Disaster. Congregate Care Centers placed on standby.

placed on standby.

. initiated with SEOC Field Teams dispatched

i

<Q

"'1:1 n

£:

'i (f)

-1025

State Personnel (1)

'd ,__.

(f)

. arrive Communications ei (1) p.m "T1

-1040 . initiated with SEOC.

JIG Operational

i 0 (1)

(/J

-1110 . Criteria met for General Emergency (GE) trl

_:g (FG1.1) 4' 0

(IQ

~

g_

s

'i t..:l z

i::

£?..

(1) ei

"'1:1

~

'i

g g

t:I

'"1

~

(1)

'"1

~

µ.

Fermi 2 August 28, 2018 0 Off-site Exercise Scenario Timeline ::i

~

~Time** !* *.* *:Evel)ts . I SE9c Atjion,s. 1: IYlo!uoe County Actions J I Wayne County Actions ; jlc Actions . ~TC Actions

'd 0

'"1

-1125

. Plant notifies SEOC . SEOC / TSC Evaluates .* Sound Sirens .* Implements PAO. . Informed of GE and . Informed of GE and

§' ~

. within 15 minutes.

Protective action . PAR.

Decides on a Protective Issues iPaws message.

Implements PAO.

Reception Decon &

Congregate Care Centers .. PAO bySEOC.

Informs media.

PAObySEOC 'd

'"1 0

~

p..

o*

recommendation (PAR) made to state Director via SEOC hotline and

.* Action Order (PAO).

Issues PAO to counties.

Requests federal assistance Reception Decon &

Congregate Care Centers activated.

activated. Issues Press Release s

(1) 0 c,r:i

(')"

e:..

i fax.

. via FEMA.

Issues further PAOs as w~

. needed.

Notifies JIG, FTC, Ohio and (1)

'"1

~c

-1155 . Plant issues second PAR to SEOC based

.. FEMA of GE and PAO Evaluates PAR.

Decides on a Protective . Informed of PAO by

i z

~n

'1j ~

exceeding PAG's at 5 miles due to radiation release continuing to

.*

Action Order (PAO).

Issues PAO to county.

Notifies JIG, FTC, Ohio, and

..* Sound Sirens Issues iPaws message Implements PAO.

Implements PAO.

SEOC.

Informs media.

Issues Press Release

Informed of PAO by SEOC

'"1 (1)

(/)

'd ......

~

(1)

"Tl rise. FEMA of GE and PAO. §"~

(1)

(JJ

-1315 . Plant terminates . Exercise play terminated by . Exercise play terminated . Exercise play terminated . Exercise play ~

(JJ

~

exercise play with SEOC Controller when all by SEOC Controller when by SEOC Controller when terminated by SEOC State. objectives demonstrated. al I objectives all objectives Controller when all objectives demonstrated. demonstrated.

~

demonstrated. 0 c,r:i

-1330 . Exercise play terminated by SEOC

'"rj (1) s

'"1 Controller when all objectives

§.

demonstrated. Iv z

i:::

~

'1j

~

'"1

£

§,..,.

UNCLASSIFIED Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Draft After Action Report/Improvement Plan Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant This page is intentionally blank.

Appendix E: Extent-of-Play Agreements 86 State of Michigan, Monroe County, Wayne County FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ML19078A213

Text

SUMMARY

Response

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCE:

Dear Captain McGowan:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Response

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

Navigation menu

Search