Text

After Action Report/Improvement Plan Exercise Dated 08/09/2016
	ML16365A035
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	11/29/2016
From:	; US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	Download: ML16365A035 (64)
	v • d • e

FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant After Action Report/

Improvement Plan Exercise Date -August 9, 2016 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Published November 29, 2016

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant This page intentionally left blank.

2

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant After Action Report/Improvement Plan Published November 29, 2016 Contents Contents...................................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

......................................................................................................... 6 SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW.................................................................................... 13 1.1 Exercise Name................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Exercise Planning Team.................................................................................................. 13 1.3 Participating Organizations.............................................................................................. 14 SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN SIBvIMARY...................................................................... 18 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design........................................................................................... 18 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities, and Activities.............................................................. 18 2.3 Scenario Summary.......................................................................................................... 19 SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITES.......................................................... 19 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results...................................................................................... 19 3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation....................................................................... 200 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries........................................................................................ 27 3.3.l Risk Jurisdictions - State ofMichigan.................................................................... 27 3.3.1.1 State of Michigan - Initial Warning Point....................................................... 27 3.3.1.2 State of Michigan-SEOC.............................................................................. 27 3.3.1.3 State of Michigan-Joint Information Center.................................................. 27 3.3.1.4 State of Michigan-State LNO-Monroe County........................................... 28 3.3.1.5 State of Michigan-State LNO-Wayne County............................................ 28 3.3.1.6 State ofMichigan-MDEQ Rep at PR/DC/CCC Whiteford HS...................... 28 3.3.1.7 State ofMichigan-MDEQ Rep at PR/DC/CCC Bedford HS.......................... 29 3.3.1.8 State ofMichigan-MDEQ Rep at PR/DC/CCC Wayne CC........................... 29 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions - Monroe County....................................................................... 30 3.3.2.l Monroe County EOC-Initial Warning Point.................................................. 30 3

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant 3.3.2.2 Monroe County-Emergency Operations Center............................................. 30 3.3.2.3 Monroe County-Dosimetry Briefing............................................................. 32 3.3.2.4 Monroe County-TACP and Dosimetry/KI Stocks......................................... 33 3.3.2.5 Monroe County-MC REP at JIC................................................................... 33 3.3.2.6 Monroe County-Rumor Control.................................................................... 33 3.3.2.7 Monroe County-EAS Radio Station/WJR..................................................... 34 3.3.2.8 Monroe County-Dosimetry........................................................................... 34 3.3.2.9 Monroe County-PR/DC/CCC-Whiteford HS.............................................. 34 3.3.2.10 Monroe County - PR/DC/CCC - Bedford HS............................................... 34 3.3.2.11 Monroe County-EV-2 School Interview -Airport Public Schools.............. 35 3.3.3 Risk Jurisdictions - Wayne County........................................................................ 36 3.3.3. l Wayne County-Initial Warning Point............................................................ 36 3.3.3.2 Wayne County-Emergency Operations Center.............................................. 36 3.3.3.3 Wayne County-Dosimetry Briefing.............................................................. 36 3.3.3.4 Wayne County-TACP Demonstration........................................................... 36 3.3.3.5 Wayne County-Wayne County REP - JIC.................................................... 37 3.3.3.6 Wayne County-PR/DC/CCC......................................................................... 37 SECTION 4: CONCLUSION.................................................................................................... 38 APPENDIX A: IMPROVEMENT PLAN................................................................................. 39 APPENDIX B: EXERCISE TIMELINE...................................................................................40 APPENDIX C: EXERCISE EVALUATION TEAM.................................................................42 Exercise Management........................................................................................................... 42 Exercise Evaluators............................................................................................................... 42 APPENDIX D: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................... 50 APPENDIX E: EXTENT OF PLAY AGREEMENTS..............................................................46 State of Michigan, Monroe and Wayne Counties Extent of Play Agreement..........................47 APPENDIX F: SCENARIO TIMELINES................................................................................. 61 Scenario Timeline............................................................................................................... 62 4

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant This page intentionally left blank.

5

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

On August 9, 2016, a Partial Participation Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise was conducted in the IO-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) around the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region V. The purpose of this exercise was to assess the level of State and local preparedness in responding to a radiological emergency. This exercise was held in accordance with DHS/FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERPs) and procedures.

The most recent exercise at this site was conducted on April 29, 2014. The qualifying emergency preparedness exercise was conducted on February 2, 1982.

The DHS/FEMA wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals who participated in this exercise. In the State of Michigan, the risk counties of Monroe and Wayne participated along with the State government.

c Protecting the public health and safety is the Partial-time job of some of the exercise participants and an additional assigned responsibility for others. Still others have willingly sought this responsibility by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities.

Cooperation and teamwork on the part of all the participants was evident during this exercise.

This Final After Action Report/Improvement Plan (AAR/IP) contains the evaluation of the biennial exercise and the evaluation of the following out-of-sequence interviews and activities:

State of Michigan Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) at the Monroe and Wayne Counties' out-of-sequence activities demonstration.

Monroe County Public Reception and Decontamination Center/Congregate Care Center at the Whiteford High School.

Public Reception and Decontamination Center/Congregate Care Center at the Bedford High School Wayne County Public Reception and Decontamination Center/Congregate Care Center at the Wayne County Community College.

6

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Except where noted in this report, the State and local organizations demonstrated knowledge of and adequately implemented their emergency response plans and procedures.

No Level 1 Findings were identified for any jurisdiction during this exercise.

No Level 2 Findings were identified for the State of Michigan during this exercise.

There was one Level 2 Finding for Monroe County, 23-16-5al-A-Ol.

The faxes that were sent to WJR at 1214 and 1224 hours0.0142 days 0.34 hours 0.00202 weeks 4.65732e-4 months , (received at 1215 and 1227) outlining an Emergency Alert System (EAS) to be broadcast were not written so as to permit radio station personnel to directly read the information to the public. The EAS message required radio station personnel to obtain information from a six-page fax regarding evacuation routes and reception centers. Area 6, another evacuated area, did not have an evacuation route stated in the EAS message. Similarly, the second EAS message contained conflicting information for areas 1, 2, and 4, with no information for areas 6 and 7. The transmitted EAS message also required WJR to broadcast information regarding reception centers. However, the information in the fax was difficult to decipher, as there were notes about whether the reception center was open, and whether to include all reception centers or just the open ones.

Staff at the Monroe County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) did not coordinate with and did not verify with WJR staff when sirens were to sound and when the EAS message was to be broadcast or if radio station staff had any questions. The EAS message was the PAO to evacuate PAA 1, 2, & 6 and had been faxed to the radio station. Although the Emergency Management Director (EMD) called radio station WJR at 1214 hours0.0141 days 0.337 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.61927e-4 months and confirmed the fax had been received, he did not allow time for the radio station staff to prepare text for broadcast or to record the message before sounding sirens at 1217 hours0.0141 days 0.338 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.630685e-4 months . The radio station staff had difficulty sorting through the six-page fax due to inconsistencies in the information that had been sent.

There were two Plan Issues for the State of Michigan both have been corrected and closed.

44-16-1.e.1-P-01; On February 1, 2016, the new State EOC at 7150 Harris Drive, Dimondale, MI was declared operational. The State EOC Emergency Operations Plans/Job Aids observed during the exercise all bore issue dates of 3/2015 or 4/2015. State EOC SOP# 3, SEOC Setup still contained the 4000 Collins Road, Lansing, MI facility floorplan and procedures. A similar Plan Issue identified during the October 27, 2015 D.C. Cook Exercise when SEOC staff members brought in their own versions of position specific procedures/ job aids and roughly half of the job aid manuals were observed to be left on the cart. Had the outdated references in the job aid manuals been used, confusion and/or errors could have resulted. This Plan Issue has been resolved.

15-15-3.a.1-P-01: The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Health Physic Response Team (HPRT) No. 1 Guidance Document Final (7/29/15) indicated that the Canberra MiniRadiac alarms were set at 1,000 mR/hr (low dose rate), 10,000 mR/hr (high dose rate), 800 mR/hr (low dose), and 2,500 mR/hr (high dose). The Guidance Document Final 1 (10/27/15) 7

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant indicated that the alarms were set at 1,000 mR/hr (low dose rate), 10,000 mR/hr (high dose rate),

800 mR (low dose), and 2,500 mR (high dose). The NFEMP Update October 2015 Staff Briefing document indicated and the Field Team Center Coordinator stated during his briefing that the MiniRadiac will alarm at 800 mR. The NFEMP Attachments document (7/27115) indicates that notification should take place at 100 mR, 1 R was the administrative limit for 5 rem TEDE dose limit, 2 R for 10 rem, and 5 R for 25 rem. The Decontamination Section used a computer and infrared interface to program the MiniRadiacs to alarm at 1,000 mR/hr (low dose rate), 3,000 mR/hr (high dose rate), 100 mR (low dose), and 1,000 mR (high dose). This Plan Issue has been resolved.

8

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant INTRODUCTION - EXERCISE BASIS On December 7, 1979, the President directed FEMA to assume the lead responsibility for all offsite nuclear planning and response. The DHS/FEMA's activities are conducted pursuant to 44 Code of Federal Regulations (CPR) Parts 350 "Review and Approval of State and Local Radiological Emergency Plans and Preparedness", 351 "Radiological Emergency Planning and Preparedness" and 352 "Commercial 352 "Commercial Nuclear Power Plants: Emergency Preparedness Planning." These regulations are a key element in the REP Program that was established following the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station accident in March 1979.

The Federal Code, 44 CPR 350 establishes the policies and procedures for DHS/FEMA's initial and continued approval of State and local governments radiological emergency planning and preparedness for commercial nuclear power plants. This approval is contingent, in part, on State and local governments' participation in joint exercises with licensees.

The DHS/FEMA's responsibilities in radiological emergency planning for fixed nuclear facilities include the following:

Taking the lead in offsite emergency planning and in the review and evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERPs) and procedures developed by State and local governments; Determining whether such plans and procedures can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of exercises of the plans and procedures conducted by State and local governments; Responding to requests by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the NRC and FEMA dated June 17, 1993 (Federal Register, Vol. 58, No. 176, September 14, 1993); and Coordinating the activities of Federal agencies with responsibilities in the radiological emergency planning process:

o U.S. Department of Agriculture; o U.S. Department of Commerce; o U.S. Department of Energy; o U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; o U.S. Department of the Interior; o U.S. Department of Transportation; 9

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/hnprovement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; o U.S. Food and Drug Administration; and o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Representatives of these agencies serve on the DHS/FEMA Region V Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by DHS/FEMA.

Formal submission of the RERPs for the FNPP to FEMA Region V by the State of Michigan and involved local jurisdictions occurred on November 19, 1981. Formal approval of these RERPs was granted by FEMA on March 9, 1987, under 44 CFR 350.

A REP Partial-Participation, Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise was conducted on August 9, 2016, and evaluated by DHS/FEMA to assess the capabilities of State and local offsite emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their RERPs and procedures to protect the public health and safety during a radiological emergency involving the FNPP.

The purpose of this report is to present the exercise results and findings on the performance of the Offsite Response Organizations (OROs) during a simulated radiological emergency.

The findings presented in this report are based on the evaluations of the Federal evaluation team, with final determinations made by the DHS/FEMA Region V RAC Chairperson, and approved by the DHS/FEMA Headquarters.

The criteria utilized in the FEMA evaluation process are contained in:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," November 1980; FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Manual, dated January 2016.

Section 1 of this report, entitled "Exercise Overview", presents information pertaining to the team that planned and coordinated the exercise. This section also provides a listing of all participating jurisdictions and functional entities that were evaluated.

Section 2 of this report, entitled "Exercise Design Summary", contains the purpose and design of the exercise, a description of the plume pathway EPZ and presents basic information and data relevant to the exercise scenario.

Section 3 of this report, entitled "Analysis of Capabilities," presents detailed information on the demonstration of applicable exercise criteria at each jurisdiction or functional entity evaluated in a jurisdiction-based, issues-only format. This section also contains: (1) descriptions of all Level 1 Findings, Level 2 Findings and Plan Issues (if any) assessed during this exercise, recommended corrective actions, and the State and local governments' schedule of corrective actions, if 10

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/hnprovement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant applicable, for each identified exercise issue; and (2) descriptions of unresolved ARCAs and Plan Issues assessed during previous exercises and the status of the ORO's efforts to resolve them.

Section 4 of this report, entitled "Conclusion" presents the DHS/FEMA summary of overall exercise conduct and results as evaluated against the requirements of 44 CFR 350.

EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE (10-Mile EPZ) DESCRIPTION The FNPP is comprised of approximately 1,120 acres of land owned by DTE Energy. The plant operator is the Detroit Edison Company. The site is bounded on the north by Swan Creek, on the east by Lake Erie, on the south by Pointe Aux Peaux Road, and on the west by Toll Road.

Entrance to the site is from Enrico Fermi Drive (a private road owned by Detroit Edison) to the west and from Pointe Aux Peaux Road to another private road owned by Detroit Edison to the south.

The plant is approximately six miles northeast of Monroe, Michigan; 30 miles southwest of downtown Detroit, Michigan; and 25 miles northeast of downtown Toledo, Michigan. The latitude of the site is 41° 57' 48" north and the longitude is 83° 15' 31" west. Site elevations range from the level of Lake Erie, on the eastern edge of the site, to approximately 25 feet above the lake level on the western edge of the site.

The 10-mile EPZ includes parts of Monroe and Wayne Counties in Michigan; parts of Lake Erie; and the southern tip of Essex County, (Bay Point) Canada. Most of the 10-mile EPZ lies within Monroe County. Coordinated efforts occur between the two counties, which are divided into five PAAs. The following jurisdictions are located within the 10-mile EPZ: Ash Township, Carleton Village, Berlin Township, Estral Beach Village, Exeter Township, South Rockwood Village, Frenchtown Township, Monroe City, Monroe Township, Raisinville Township, Brownstown Township, Gibraltar City, Flat Rock City, and Rockwood City. The population in the 10-mile EPZ, based on the 2010 census, is 97,825.

Land use within the 10-mile EPZ is diverse. About 55 percent of the land is farmland. The majority of agricultural land is located in Monroe County. The portion of Wayne County nearest to Detroit is a growing residential suburb. Twelve state parks and recreational areas and several light industries are located within the 10-mile EPZ.

There are three major roads within 10 miles of the plant, Interstates 75 and 275 and U.S. Route

24. Their closest approach to the plant is 4.1 miles, 4.2 miles and 5.8 miles, respectively. Five railroad lines operate within IO-miles of the plant. These include the Canadian National Railroad, the Norfolk Southern Railroad, the Chesapeake and Michigan Railroad, the Detroit Toledo and Ironton Railroad and the Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad. There are no major airports within 15-miles of the site.

II

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant This page intentionally left blank.

12

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW 1.1 Exercise Name FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Type of Exercise Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise Date August 9, 2016 Program Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Scenario Type Radiological Emergency 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Sean 0 'Leary Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) Chair DHS/FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street, 7th Floor Chicago, IL 60605 312-408-5389 Sean.Oleary@fema.dhs.gov Dwaine Warren Exercise Director DHS/FEMA Region V Supervisory Team Leader 536 South Clark Street, 7th Floor Chicago, IL 60605 312-408-5342 Dwaine.Warren@fema.dhs.gov James King (Acting) Site Specialist DHS/FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street, 7th Floor Chicago, IL 60605 312-408-5596 James.King@fema.dhs.gov 13

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Tonya Nobach REP Program Manager Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Michigan State Police 7150 Harris Drive Dimondale, MI 48821 517-284-3956 NobachT@michigan.gov 1.3 Participating Organizations Agencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Exercise on August 9, 2016, and/or in out-of-sequence demonstrations:

State of Michigan Governor's Authorized Representative State Director EMHSD Assistant State Director EHSD Site Liaison Utility Liaison State Agency Technical Specialist PIO Operations Chief Message Controller Planning Group Chief Logistics Group Chief Hotline Operators (utility, Wayne, and Monroe)

GIS Support IT Support Finance Section Chief National Weather Service 14

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant

Health Physics Section (SIMCELL)

State Agencies:

0 Agriculture 0

American Red Cross 0

Attorney General 0

Civil Rights 0

Community Health 0

Corrections 0

Education 0

Environmental Quality 0

Human Services 0

Licensing and Regulatory Affairs 0

Michigan Supreme Court 0

Military and Veteran Affairs 0

Natural Resources 0

Office of Services to the Aging 0

State Police 0

Technology Management and Budget 0

Transportation Monroe County

American Red Cross

MC Health and Human Services

Michigan State Police

Monroe County Sheriff's Office

Department of Health

MC DPW /Road Commission

M-Mental Health

DTE Energy 15

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant

RACES

Monroe County EMA

Monroe City Police

Monroe Department of Education

Monroe Department of Agriculture

Commission on Aging

Wayne County EMA Representative

MSP Department of Emergency Management

Pro Medical Health Systems

Rockwood Fire Department

City of Monroe Fire Department

Frenchtown Township Fire Department

Huron Township Fire Department

Monroe School District Wayne County

Michigan State Police

Michigan Department of Health and Human Services

Salvation Army

American Red Cross

Public Health

Health Emergency Medical Services

Wayne County Damage Assessment 16

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant

Wayne County Public Information

Down River Police Mutual Aid

Down River Fire Mutual Aid

Western Wayne Mutual Aid

Wayne County Sheriffs Office

Wayne County Environmental Health

Wayne County Emergency Management Wayne County Regional Educational Services Agency

Wayne County Public Works

City of Gibraltar

City of Rockwood

City of Brownstown

City of Flat Rock 17

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN

SUMMARY

2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design The purpose of this exercise is to evaluate Player actions against current emergency response plans, procedures, and performance capabilities for a National Preparedness Program-related incident, and to comply with the requirements of 44 CFR 350 and the guidelines ofNUREG 0654/FEMA-REP-1. Exercise Planners utilized the REP Program Manual (RPM) (January 2016) to develop this exercise.

The objective of the exercise was to demonstrate reasonable assurance that the public can be protected during a NPP emergency.

2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities, and Activities Exercise objectives and identified Capabilities/REP Criteria selected to be demonstrated are discussed in Appendix E.

The Exercise Planning Team (EPT) selected objectives that focus on evaluation of emergency response procedures, identifying areas for improvement, and achieving a collaborative attitude.

This exercise focused on OROs effectively demonstrating the following objectives:

Emergency Operations Center Management Protective Action Decision-Making Protective Action Implementation Emergency Notification and Public Information Support Operations and Facilities 2.3 Scenario Summary Appendix B "2016 FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Offsite Timeline," contains a summary of the Exercise Scenario, a simulated sequence of events that was used as the basis for invoking emergency response actions by OROs in the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise for the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant held on August 9, 2016.

This exercise scenario was submitted by the State Michigan and accepted by DHS/FEMA Region Von July 5, 2016.

During the exercise, in addition to information and data provided through the FNPP onsite scenario, controllers from the State of Michigan provided "inject messages" containing scenario events and/or relevant data to those persons or locations who would normally receive notification of such events. These inject messages were the method used for invoking additional specific response actions by OROs.

18

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/hnprovement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILTIES 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results This section presents the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the August 9, 2016, REP Partial Participation, Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of State and local governments in the 10-mile EPZ surrounding the FNPP.

Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated based on its demonstration of exercise criteria delineated in the FEMA P-1028 REP Program Manual, dated January 2016. Detailed information on the exercise criteria and the extent-of-play agreement used in this exercise can be found in Appendix E.

Presented below are definitions of the terms used in this report relative to the criteria demonstration status:

M - Met: The status of a REP exercise Evaluation Area Criterion indicating that the participating ORO demonstrated all demonstration criteria for the Evaluation Area Criterion to the level required in the extent-of-play agreement with no Deficiencies, ARCAs or Plan Issues assessed in the current exercise and no unresolved prior ARCAs.

Ll - Level 1 Finding: An observed or identified inadequacy of organizational performance in an exercise that could cause a finding that offsite emergency preparedness is not adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken in the event of a radiological emergency to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant.

L2 - Level 2 Finding: An observed or identified inadequacy of organizational performance in an exercise that is not considered, by itself, to adversely impact public health and safety. Listing of the demonstrated exercise criteria under which a Level 2 Finding was assessed during the current exercise or Level 2 Finding assessed during prior exercises remain unresolved. Included is a description of any Level 2 Findings assessed during this exercise and the recommended corrective action to be demonstrated before or during the next biennial exercise.

P-Plan Issue: An observed or identified inadequacy in the ORO's emergency plan or implementing procedures, rather than in the ORO's performance.

N - Not Demonstrated: Exercise criteria that were not demonstrated as scheduled during this exercise and the reason(s) they were not demonstrated.

Prior Issues -Resolved: Descriptions of Level 2 Findings assessed during previous exercises that were resolved and the corrective actions demonstrated, in this exercise.

19

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Prior Issues - Unresolved: Descriptions of Level 2 Findings assessed during prior exercises that were not resolved in this exercise. Included in the descriptions is the reason the Level 2 Finding remains unresolved and the recommended corrective actions to be demonstrated before or during the next exercise.

3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation This subsection provides information on the evaluation of each participating jurisdiction and functional entity in a jurisdiction-based, issues-only format.

The matrix presented in Table 3.1, on the following page(s), presents the status of all exercise criteria from the FEMA P-1028 REP Program Manual, dated January 2016, which were scheduled for demonstration during this exercise by all participating jurisdictions and functional entities. The Exercise Criterion status box is blank if it was not scheduled for demonstration.

The DHS/FEMA has developed a standardized system for numbering exercise issues. This system is used to achieve consistency in numbering exercise issues among DHS/FEMA Regions and site-specific exercise reports within each Region. It also is used to expedite tracking of exercise issues on a nationwide basis.

The identifying number of Level I Findings, Level 2 Findings, and Plan Issues includes the following elements, with each element separated by a hyphen (-).

Plant Site Identifier -A two-digit number, corresponding to the Utility Billable Plant Site Code (03 for FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant).

Exercise Year - The last two digits of the year the exercise was conducted.

Demonstration Criterion - The letters and number corresponding to the Demonstration Criterion in the six Exercise Evaluation Areas described in the FEMA P-1028 REP Program Manual, dated January 2016, which supersedes the Federal Register Notice, Vol. 67, No. 80, dated April 25, 2002.

Issue Classification Identifier - (LI =Level 1 Finding, L2 =Level 2 Finding, P =Plan Issue).

Exercise Issue Identification Number - A separate two or three-digit indexing number assigned to each issue identified in the exercise.

20

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI IT Nuclear Power Plant Table 3.1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation

[/)

r:

[/)

1: ::r: u u

cf: 1:

Q)

State of Michigan B

cf:

i::

~

-0 id' Q)

3

DATE: August 9, 2016 0

o:l SITE: FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant i::

0 u u u

l i:: u u u 0

l u u

~

u 0

-.. u Q) u u u

M: Met, Ll: Level 1 Finding, L2: Level 2 Finding, 0

Q)

~ ~ ~

~

P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated i::

0 p..

p..

E

3

'iii

'iii u

I I

a. a. a.

0 0

~ ~

Q) 0 u

i::z::

~

0 3 3 O' O' O' t:.t.l

[/)

Q)

Q) t:.t.l t:.t.l t:.t.l

~ ~ u l'l Ol

~ ~ ~

en

[/)

Emergency Operations Management Mobilization Jal M M M Facilities lbl Direction and Control lei M M Communications Equipment ldl M M M M M Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lei M M M M Protective Action Decision-Making EW Exposure Control Decisions 2al M

M M PARs 2bl M

M M PADs 2b2 M M PADs for Disabled/Functional Needs 2cl M

Ingestion PADs 2dl RRR Decisions 2el Protective Action Implementation EW Exposure Control lmplementation 3al M M Kl Public/Institutionalized 3bl M

PAD Implementation Disabled/Functional Needs 3cl PAD Implementation Schools 3c2 TACP Establishment 3dl M

Impediments 3d2 Implement Ingestion P ADs 3el Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation ofRRR Decisions 3fl Field Measurement and Analysis RESERVED 4al Field Team Management 4a2 Field Team Operations 4a3 Field Team Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl 21

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Cl)

r:

Cl) 1'. :r: u u

c8 1'.

State of Michigan 2

c8 c

~

-0

~

DATE: August 9, 2016 0

ill SITE: FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant c

0 u u u c u u u 0

"' u u u u

0 -- -- --

.., u u u u M: Met, L1: Level 1 Finding, L2: Level 2 Finding, 0

~

Cl Cl 2

c

~ ~

P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated 0

~ 0...

0...

E

~ 'iii

'iii

'iii u

I I

c. c. c.

0 u

0 0

~ ~ ~

~

0 3 3 O' O' O' w

Cl)

.., w '1.l

'1.l

~ - u

'iii

'iii Cl

~ ~

E UJ UJ

E Emergency Notification and Public Info Initial Alert & Notification Sal M M M M RESERVED 5a2 Backup Alert & Notification 5a3 Exception Area Alerting 5a4 Subsequent Information & Instructions 5bl M

Support Operations and Facilities Reception Center Operations 6al M M EW Monitoring & Decontamination 6bl M

Congregate Care 6cl M

Contaminated Injured Transport & Care 6dl M

22

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Table 3.1-Summary of Exercise Evaluation c

0

~

0

..c::

u

0.

en

. ~

Cl

0 Monroe County

..c::

l

~

p...

DATE: August 9, 2016

.!2 t::

i::

0 u

0.

SITE: FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant

.8 0

en en c;

i::

en S2 e:;

l

-0

i::

I 0

M: Met, Ll: Level 1 Finding, L2: Level 2 Finding, u

t8

-0

~

u 2

t8 P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated b

0 00 0

~

-0 w

c; E

0

!.i:;

-~

0

'° B

0

.~ *;;;

u 0

~

I I

c;

§ as 0

cZi Cl t::i b

I u u 8 0

ti c;

0 u u u £

-0 0

'6 £ c;

u u u

..c::

ro

0.

ro u

0

.§ p...

~

Ci 0::

E u u en c:

~

Cl N

p...

"' u E

en

~

0 0

u

~ <

0

s Cl E-<

s w

Cl p...

p...

w Emergency Operations Management Mobilization la! M M

M M

Facilities

!bl Direction and Control lei M

M M

Communications Equipment

!di M M

M M

Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lei M

M M

M Protective Action Decision-Making EW Exposure Control Decisions 2al M

PARs 2bl M

PADs 2b2 M

P ADs for Disabled/Functional Needs 2cl M

Ingestion P ADs 2dl RRR Decisions 2el Protective Action Implementation EW Exposure Control Implementation 3al M

M M

Kl Public/Institutionalized 3bl M

PAD Implementation Disabled/Functional Needs 3cl M

PAD Implementation Schools 3c2 M

M TACP Establishment 3dl M

M Impediments 3d2 M

Implement Ingestion PADs 3el Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation ofRRR Decisions 3fl Field Measurement and Analysis RESERVED 4al Field Team Management 4a2 Field Team Operations 4a3 Field Team San1pling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl 23

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant c

<!.)

0

~

0

..c

(.)

0..

Cll

<!.)

.S!

0

0 Monroe County

..c

l

~

0..

DATE: August 9, 2016

~

t::

0

(.)

0..

SITE: FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant 2

0 Cll Cll c;

c:

Cll

<1'.

~

e:;

l "E!

c:

I 0

M: Met, LI: Level 1 Finding, L2: Level 2 Finding, u

.J2 "E!

~

u

~

<!.)

£

.J2

<!.)

P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated 0

00 e

~

-0

<!.)

w c;

E 0

c;

<!.)

~

0

~ £ 0

<!.)

c:;;

u 0

~

I I.s

§ 0

en

~ 0

~ b I

u u 8 0

o:;

c; 0

u u u f'

-0 0

a c u u

..c

<!.)

§ 0.. u ro

...._ u

(.)

0

.§ 0..

~

(5 0:::

.§ u Cll

~

2 u

E Cll

~ ~

N u

0 0

<1'.

l Z5 0

~ 0 f-<

~ 0:::

0 11..

0.. w Emergency Notification and Public Info Initial Alert & Notification Sal L2 M

RESERVED 5a2 Backup Alert & Notification 5a3 Exception Area Alerting 5a4 Subsequent Information & Instructions Sbl M

M M

Support Operations and Facilities Reception Center Operations 6al M

M EW Monitoring & Decontamination 6bl Congregate Care 6cl M

M Contaminated Injured Transport & Care 6dl 24

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Reportllmprovement Plan FERMI II N uclear Power Plant Table 3.1-Summary of Exercise Evaluation (Cont'd)

Wayne County DATE: August 9, 2016 SITE: FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant M: Met, L 1: Level 1 Finding, L2: Level 2 F inding, u

P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated c:

ca u

bl) 0

c.

0 c:

-~.,

w t+:

b p::

0.,

"' 0 c:

c: co 0

c: u E

u 8 £., 8 u Cl., u c:

E 0..

c:

~

0..

~ *;;; u

~

~ ~

0

~ ~

Cl 0..

Emergency Operations Management Mobilization la! M M Facilities

!bl Direction and Control lei M

Communications Equipment ldl M M M

Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lei M M M Protective Action Decision-Making EW Exposure Control Decisions 2al M

PARs 2bl M

PADs 2b2 M

P ADs for Disabled/Functional Needs 2cl M

Ingestion P ADs 2dl RRR Decisions 2el Protective Action Implementation EW Exposure Control In1plementation 3al M M M Kl Public/Institutionalized 3bl M

PAD Implementation Disabled/Functional Needs 3cl M

PAD Implementation Schools 3c2 M

TACP Establishment 3dl M

Impediments 3d2 M

M Implement Ingestion P ADs 3el Ingestion Pathway Decisions 3e2 Implementation ofRRR Decisions 3fl Field M easurement and Analysis RESERVED 4al Field Team Management 4a2 Field Team Operations 4a3 Field Team Sampling 4bl Laboratory Operations 4cl 25

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMJ II Nuclear Power Plant Wayne County DATE: August 9, 2016 SITE: FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant M: Met, L 1: Level 1 Finding, L2: Level 2 Finding, u

c:::

P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated c

ta u

Oil 0

a.

0 c

~

w t.:;

~ °'

0 0

c:

c

§

~

0

§ u 0 £ E 8 u u

0 u

.§ 0...

.., u c

c

~

~ "' u

~

0

~

0 E-0...

Emergency Notification and Public Info Initial Alert & Notification Sal M

RESERVED 5a2 Backup Alert & Notification 5a3 Exception Area Alerting 5a4 Subsequent Information & Instructions 5bl M

M Support Operations and Facilities Reception Center Operations 6al EW Monitoring & Decontamination 6bl Congregate Care 6cl Contaminated Injured Transport & Care 6dl 26

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/hnprovement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 3.3.1 Risk Jurisdictions - State of Michigan 3.3.1.1 State of Michigan - Initial Warning Point In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.a.1, l.d.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.2 State ofMichigan-SEOC In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: lal, lcl, ldl, lel,2al,2bl,2b2,2cl,3bl,3dl,5al,5bl

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.3 State of Michigan - Joint Information Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: lal, lcl, ldl, lel, 2b2, 5bl

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 27

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant 3.3.1.4 State of Michigan - State LNO - Monroe County In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 2.a.l, 2.b.l, 5.a.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.5 State of Michigan - State LNO - Wayne County In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 2.a.1, 2.b.l, 5.a.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.6 State of Michigan -MDEQ Rep at PR/DC/CCC Whiteford HS In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.d.1, 1.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.a.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 28

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant 3.3.1.7 State of Michigan - MDEQ Rep at PR/DC/CCC Bedford HS In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 1.d.l, 1.e.l, 3.a.l, 6.a.1

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.1.8 State of Michigan -MDEQ Rep at PR/DC/CCC Wayne CC In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET:

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 29

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions - Monroe County 3.3.2.1 Monroe County EOC-Initial Warning Point In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.a.l, l.d.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.2 Monroe County - Emergency Operations Center Criterion 5.a.1 During the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant (FNPP) Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise on Tuesday, August 9, 2016, Monroe County failed to complete activities associated with primary alerting and notification of the public in a timely manner following the initial decision by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. The initial instructional message to the public included all minimum elements required by current FEMA REP Guidance. The demonstration was conducted at the Monroe County Emergency Operations Center located at 987 S. Raisinville Road, Monroe, Michigan.

At 0845 hours0.00978 days 0.235 hours 0.0014 weeks 3.215225e-4 months , the Emergency Management Director (EMD) at the Monroe County EOC received notice that an Alert Emergency Classification Level (ECL) had been declared at FNPP at 0837 hours0.00969 days 0.233 hours 0.00138 weeks 3.184785e-4 months . The Executive Secretary for the EOC prepared a message that was faxed to WJR Radio, the Emergency Alert System (EAS) radio station located in Detroit, Michigan. The message informed the station of the event at FNPP a placed the station on standby.

The EOC used pre-scripted EAS messages that are completed by the Executive Secretary with situation specific information and then faxed to the radio station for broadcast. Once the fax was sent, the EMD called the radio station to confirm the fax message was received. After the confirmation process, the sirens were sounded for all or part of the EPZ. Sirens for the entire FNPP EPZ are sounded by the Monroe EOC with coordination from the Wayne County EOC. All siren soundings and radio broadcasts were simulated throughout the exercise.

At 1013 hours0.0117 days 0.281 hours 0.00167 weeks 3.854465e-4 months , the notice was received that a Site Area Emergency (SAE) had been declared at FNPP at 1002 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00166 weeks 3.81261e-4 months . And at 1158 hours0.0134 days 0.322 hours 0.00191 weeks 4.40619e-4 months , the notice that a General Emergency (GE) had been declared at 1149 hours0.0133 days 0.319 hours 0.0019 weeks 4.371945e-4 months was received.

A total of two EAS messages were broadcast during this exercise. The first was a Governor's Protective Action Order (PAO) to evacuate Protective Action Areas (PAA) 1, 2, & 6 and included marine traffic on Lake Erie to five miles. At 1214 hours0.0141 days 0.337 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.61927e-4 months , the EMD faxed the EAS message to 30

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant WJR and at 1215 called the station to confirm they had received the fax and upon conclusion of the call, sounded the sirens at 1217 hours0.0141 days 0.338 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.630685e-4 months .

At 1208 hours0.014 days 0.336 hours 0.002 weeks 4.59644e-4 months , an amended PAO was received at the EOC that evacuated 1, 2, 4, 6 & 7 and marine traffic to 10 miles from FNPP on Lake Erie. The amended PAO was faxed to the radio station by the EMD at 1224 hours0.0142 days 0.34 hours 0.00202 weeks 4.65732e-4 months . The EMD called WJR to confirm the station had received the second fax and sounded the sirens at 1227 hours0.0142 days 0.341 hours 0.00203 weeks 4.668735e-4 months .

The faxes that were sent to WJR at 1214 and 1224_hours, (received at 1215 and 1227) outlining an Emergency Alert System to be broadcast were not written so as to permit radio station personnel to directly read the information to the public. The EAS message required radio station personnel to obtain information from a 6 page fax regarding evacuation routes and reception centers. Each faxed packet contained the following documents; cover sheet, evacuation order, protective action areas, a map of PAA, routes to reception/congregate care centers for Monroe County, and reception/congregate care centers for Wayne County. The initial EAS request contained information regarding evacuation routes in two places for areas 1 and 2, and they differed in content. Area 6, another evacuated area, did not have an evacuation route stated. in the EAS message. Similarly, the second EAS message contained conflicting information for areas 1, 2, and 4, with no information for areas 6 and 7. The transmitted EAS message also required WJR to broadcast information regarding reception centers. However, the information in the fiix was difficult to decipher, as there were notes about whether the reception center was open, and whether to include all reception centers or just the open ones.

The EAS messaging process from Monroe County EOC to WJR Radio requires that station personnel have a certain amount of training and familiarity with the documents that were sent to prepare for an accurate and timely broadcast. There was little evidence of coordination or instruction from the EOC to the station as to when the sirens would sound and when the EAS message should be read. This lack of coordination could lead to the EAS message being delivered prior to siren alerting that could lead to confusion for public.

Additionally, the message Evacuation Order stated that EAS message was to be broadcast every 15-minutes, while the Monroe County Emergency Plan, Annex D, Appendix 1, Nuclear Accident Procedures Public Information", pp Dl 1 & Dl3, states "(Note: Please rebroadcast this message every five minutes for the first fifteen minutes and then every fifteen minutes until changed or cancelled.)" These are pre-scripted massages for Shelter in Place and Evacuation respectively.

Condition: The faxes that were sent to WJR at 1214 and 1224 hours0.0142 days 0.34 hours 0.00202 weeks 4.65732e-4 months , (received at 1215 and 1227) outlining an Emergency Alert System (EAS) to be broadcast were not written so as to permit radio station personnel to directly read the information to the public. The EAS message required radio station personnel to obtain information from a 6 page fax regarding evacuation routes and reception centers. Area 6, another evacuated area, did not have an evacuation route stated in the EAS message. Similarly, the second EAS message contained conflicting information for areas 1, 2, and 4, with no information for areas 6 and 7. The transmitted EAS message also required WJR to broadcast information regarding reception centers. However, the information in the fax was difficult to decipher, as there were notes about whether the reception 31

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant center was open, and whether to include all reception centers or just the open ones.

Staff at the Monroe County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) did not coordinate with and did not verify with WJR staff when sirens were to sound and when the EAS message was to be broadcast or ifradio station staff had any questions. The EAS message was the PAO to evacuate PAA 1, 2, & 6 and had been faxed to the radio station. Although the Emergency Management Director (EMD) called radio station WJR at 1214 hours0.0141 days 0.337 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.61927e-4 months and confirmed the fax had been received, he did not allow time for the radio station staff to prepare text for broadcast or to record the message before sounding sirens at 1217 hours0.0141 days 0.338 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.630685e-4 months . The radio station staff had difficulty sorting through the six page fax due to inconsistencies in the information that had been sent.

Possible Cause: The possible cause of the EAS process is a lack of coordination between the EOC and radio station as to what and when events should happen. Procedures for the station staff were not available. Documentation sent to the station contained inconsistent information.

Reference:

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, E.5, 6, 7 Potential Effect: The potential effect of a cumbersome EAS process and lack of coordination is the possibility that EAS messages may be sent out of sequence relative to siren sounding, messages may not be sent in a timely manner or may contain erroneous information.

Recommendation: Ensure that enough time exists between the decision to activate the sirens and EAS and their actual activation. Coordination between the EOC and radio station as to when sirens are sounded and when the EAS is broadcast is to occur. Staff should review procedures prior to the GE ECL to ensure any preparations that can be made in advance of the decision are done so. Review documents relating to EAS messaging for clarity and remove any unnecessary documents from the fax packet sent to the radio station. Provide the radio station with training and procedures to more familiarize staff with procedures.

In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: lal, lcl, ldl, lel, 2al, 2bl, 2b2, 2cl, 3al,3bl, 3cl, 3c2, 3dl, 3d2, 5bl

b. LEVEL I FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: 5.a. l

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.3 Monroe County - Dosimetry Briefing In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: lei, 3al

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None 32

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.4 Monroe County-TACP and Dosimetry/Kl Stocks In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: ldl, lel, 3al, 3dl

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.5 Monroe County - MC REP at JIC In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 5.b.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.6 Monroe County - Rumor Control In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: lcl, ldl, 5bl

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 33

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant 3.3.2.7 Monroe County-EAS Radio Station/WJR In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: ldl, Sal

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.8 Monroe County - Dosimetry In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.e.1

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.9 Monroe County - PR/DC/CCC - Whiteford HS In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: lal, lcl, ldl, lel, 6al, 6cl

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.10 Monroe County - PR/DC/CCC - Bedford HS In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: lal, lcl, ldl, lel, 6al, 6cl 34

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.2.11 Monroe County-EV-2 School Interview-Airport Public Schools In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.1, 3.c.2

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 35

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant 3.3.3 Risk Jurisdictions - Wayne County 3.3.3.1 Wayne County-Initial Warning Point In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.a.l, l.d.1

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.2 Wayne County - Emergency Operations Center In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: lal, lcl, ldl, lel, 2al, 2bl, 2b2, 2cl, 3al, 3bl, 3cl, 3c2, 3dl, 3d2, Sal, 5bl

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.3 Wayne County - Dosimetry Briefing In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.e.l, 3.a.l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f.

PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.4 Wayne County-TACP Demonstration In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: ldl, lel,3al,3d2 36

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.5 Wayne County-Wayne County REP - JIC In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: 5.b. l

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 3.3.3.6 Wayne County-PR/DC/CCC In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET:

b. LEVEL 1 FINDINGS: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDINGS: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

£ PRIOR ISSUES: RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES: UNRESOLVED: None 37

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant SECTION 4: CONCLUSION This section summarizes the findings from the of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the August 9, 2016, Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Partial Participation Plume Exposure Pathway exercise to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of State and local governments in the 10-mile and 50-mile EPZs surrounding the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant.

There were no Level 1 Findings identified for the State of Michigan or the Counties of Monroe or Wayne during this exercise.

There was one Level 2 Finding for Monroe County, 23-16-5al-L2-0l.

The faxes that were sent to WJR at 1214 and 1224 hours0.0142 days 0.34 hours 0.00202 weeks 4.65732e-4 months , (received at 1215 and 1227) outlining an Emergency Alert System (EAS) to be broadcast were not written so as to permit radio station personnel to directly read the information to the public. The EAS message required radio station personnel to obtain information from a six-page fax regarding evacuation routes and reception centers. Area 6, another evacuated area, did not have an evacuation route stated in the EAS message. Similarly, the second EAS message contained conflicting information for areas 1, 2, and 4, with no information for areas 6 and 7. The transmitted EAS message also required WJR to broadcast information regarding reception centers. However, the information in the fax was difficult to decipher, as there were notes about whether the reception center was open, and whether to include all reception centers or just the open ones.

Staff at the Monroe County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) did not coordinate with and did not verify with WJR staff when sirens were to sound and when the EAS message was to be broadcast or ifradio station staff had any questions. The EAS message was the PAO to evacuate PAA 1, 2, & 6 and had been faxed to the radio station. Although the Emergency Management Director (EMD) called radio station WJR at 1214 hours0.0141 days 0.337 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.61927e-4 months and confirmed the fax had been received, he did not allow time for the radio station staff to prepare text for broadcast or to record the message before sounding sirens at 1217 hours0.0141 days 0.338 hours 0.00201 weeks 4.630685e-4 months . The radio station staff had difficulty sorting through the six-page fax due to inconsistencies in the information that had been sent.

Both Plan issues for the State of Michigan were closed during this exercise.

38

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX A: IMPROVEMENT PLAN This section summarizes the findings from the of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the August 9, 2016, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of State and local governments in the 10-mile EPZ surrounding the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant, recommended corrective actions, and a schedule of corrective actions for the identified Primary Responsible Agency.

Level 2 Finding:

23-16-5al-L2-01.

==

Description:==

The faxes that were sent to WJR at 1214 and 1224 hours0.0142 days 0.34 hours 0.00202 weeks 4.65732e-4 months , (received at 1215 and 1227) outlining an Emergency Alert System (EAS) to be broadcast were not written so as to permit radio station personnel to directly read the information to the public. The EAS message required radio station personnel to obtain information from a six-page fax regarding evacuation routes and reception centers. Area 6, another evacuated area, did not have an evacuation route stated in the EAS message. Similarly, the second EAS message contained conflicting information for areas 1, 2, and 4, with no information for areas 6 and 7. The transmitted EAS message also required WJR to broadcast information regarding reception centers. However, the information in the fax was difficult to decipher, as there were notes about whether the reception center was open, and whether to include all reception centers or just the open ones.

Corrective Action Response:

Monroe County provided a new memorandum explaining the corrective action and confirming that documentation sent to the radio station will be corrected in all future exercises. A discussion was requested by Monroe County.

Completion Date:

April 2017 39

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX B: EXERCISE TIMELINE Table B-1, below, presents the times at which key events and activities occurred during the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Radiological Emergency Preparedness Partial Participation Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise conducted on August 9, 2016.

40

U nclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant TABLEBl E T"

I'

6 FERMI II N p

Pl E

A 9 2016 xerc1se ime me or uc ear ow er ant xerc1se; ugust '

Time that Notification Was Received or Action Was Taken Emergency Time Classification Level Utility State of State of Monroe Wayne Event or Action Declared Michigan Michigan County County SEOC JIC Unusual Event NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Alert 0837 0848 NIA 0845 0847 Site Area Emergency 1002 1002 1013 1013 1013 General Emergency 1145 1149 1200 1158 1158 Simulated Radiation Release Started 1145 1149 1200 1158 1158 Simulated Radiation Release Terminated NIA NIA NIA 1158 NIA Facility Declared Operational 0943 1023 0929 0905 Ag Advisory 1208 1208 1234 1232 Shelter of Animals 0957 Air, Water, and Rail 1218 1221 1241 1225 County Declaration of Emergency 1019 1013 Declaration of State of Emergency 1046 1049 Exercise Terminated 1338 1347 1338 1338 Early Information Message - Fermi Notice of Incident NIA NIA NIA NIA 151 Early Precautionary/Protective Action State 1012 1015 1017 1018 Distribution KI to Special Populations 1" Protective Action Recommendation 1149 151 Protective Action Order: Evacuate PAAs 1, 2, 4 1149 1149 1210 1212

!st Siren Activation 1217 I ' 1 EAS Message 1220 2nd Protective Action Recommendation: Evacuate PAAs 1208 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 2nd Protective Action Order 1214 2nd Siren Activation 1227 2nd EAS Message 1230 KI Administration Decision 1150 1150 1212 1210 4 1

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX C: EXERCISE EVALUATION TEAM The following is a list of the personnel that managed the evaluation process and evaluated the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise on August 9, 2016. The organization each of the personnel represents is indicated by the following abbreviations:

U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency (DHS/FEMA)

ICF International (ICFI)

Exercise Management MANAGEMENT TITLE NAME ORGANIZATION Regional Assistance Committee, Chair Sean O'Leary DHS/FEMA Exercise Director Dwaine Warren DHS/FEMA Assistant Exercise Director Stephen Tulley DHS/FEMA Acting Michigan Site Specialist James King DHS/FEMA Team Leader - Monroe County, MI James King DHS/FEMA Team Leader - Wayne County, MI Don Daniel DHS/FEMA Regional Coordinator Jill Leatherman ICFI Exercise Evaluators LOCATION EVALUATOR AGENCY Michigan SEOC Alvin Blake DHS/FEMA MDEQ Rep at PR/DC/CCC-Wayne CC Christopher Roe DHS/FEMA Wayne County PR/DC/CCC Monroe County TACP and Dosimetry/KI Stocks Clinton Crackel DHS/FEMA EV-2 School Interview-Airport Public Schools David Ortman DHS/FEMA MI State LNO-Wayne County Don Daniel DHS/FEMA MI State LNO - Monroe County James King DHS/FEMA Michigan SEOC Janet Hlavaty-LaPosa DHS/FEMA Monroe County EOC John Price DHS/FEMA Wayne County IWP Kimberly Alahmadi DHS/FEMA 42

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant LOCATION EVALUATOR AGENCY Wayne CountyEOC MI SEOCJIC Meghan Breitenbach DHS/FEMA Monroe County Rumor Control Wayne County Dosimetry Briefing Todd Lawson DHS/FEMA Wayne County TACP Demonstration MI SEOCJIC Monroe County Rep at JIC Debra Schneck ICFI Wayne County Rep at JIC Wayne County EOC Gary Bolender ICFI MDEQ Rep at PR/DC/CCC - Bedford HS Monroe County EAS Radio Station/WJR Gary Goldberg ICFI Monroe County PR/DC/CCC - Bedford HS MDEQ Rep at PR/DC/CCC - Whiteford HS Monroe County Health Dept. - Dosimetry Marcy Campbell ICFI Monroe County PR/DC/CCC - Whiteford HS Monroe County IWP Monroe County EOC Mark Dalton ICFI Monroe County Dosimetry Briefing Wayne County EOC Michael Meshenberg ICFI Monroe County EOC Thomas Gahan ICFI 43

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant APPENDIX D: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS The following is a list of the acronyms used in this AAR/IP.

ACRONYM MEANING

µR Micro (1 o-6) R I micro Roentgen ARC American Red Cross ARES Amateur Radios Emergency Service cc Congregate Care CDE Committed Dose Equivalent cpm counts per minute DC Dosimetry Coordinator DD Dosimetry Distribution DRD Direct-Reading Dosimeters EAS Emergency Alert System ECL Emergency Classification Level EMA Emergency Management Agency EMD Emergency Management Director EMS Emergency Medical Services EOC Emergency Operations Center EPZ Emergency Planning Zone EV-2 Reference to FEMA REP Guidance Memorandum - GM EV-2, Protective Actions for School Children, November 13, 1986 EW Emergency Worker FD Fire Department FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FMT Field Monitoring Team FMTC Field Monitoring Team Coordinator GE General Emergency HF High Frequency IC Incident Commander nc Joint Information Center KI potassium iodide MID Monitoring I Decontamination MAR CS Multi-Agency Radio Communications System MDH Michigan Department of Health MEMA Michigan Emergency Management Agency 44

Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/Improvement Plan FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant ACRONYM MEANING MSHP Michigan State Highway Patrol MTC Monitoring Team Communicator ORO Offsite Response Organization( s)

OSLD Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter PAD Protective Action Decision PAG Protective Action Guide PAR Protective Action Recommendation PIO Public Information Officer PRD Permanent Record Dosimeter R

Roentgen RAC Regional Assistance Committee RACES Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service RC Radiological Coordinator I Reception Center r context sensitivel REP Radiological Emergency Preparedness RERP Radiological Emergency Response Plan RO Radiological Officer SA Staging Area SAE Site Area Emergency SEOC State Emergency Operations Center SIP Shelter In Place SNB Special News Bulletin SOG Standard Operating Guideline I Suf!f!ested Operational Guidance SSP Sampling Screening Point TARC Triangle Amateur Radio Club TCP Traffic Control Point TEDE Total Effective Dose Equivalent TLD Thermo-luminescent Dosimeter UHF Ultra High Frequency VHF Very high :frequency WCCTC Wayne County Career & Technical Center WCEMA Wayne County Emergency Management Agency 45

APPENDIX E: EXTENT OF PLAY AGREEMENTS This Appendix presents the Extent of Play Agreements and lists the exercise criteria that were scheduled for demonstration in the FERMI II Nuclear Power Plant Radiological Emergency Preparedness, Partial Participation, Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise on August 9, 2016, and the offsite extent-of-play agreements accepted by DHS/FEMA Region Von July 20, 2016 The exercise criteria, contained in the DHS/FEMA P-1028 REP Program Manual, Dated January 2016, represent a functional translation of the planning standards and evaluation criteria ofNUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for the Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," November 1980. Because the exercise criteria are intended for use at all nuclear power plants sites, and because of variations among offsite plans and procedures, an extent-of-play agreement is prepared by the State and accepted by DHS/FEMA to provide evaluators with guidance on expected actual demonstration of the criteria.

The specific Radiological Emergency Preparedness criteria that were scheduled for demonstration during the exercise are listed in the State of Michigan and Wayne and Monroe Counties Extent-of Play Agreements, which follow.

46

State Of Michigan Monroe and Wayne Counties Extent of Play Agreement FERMI IIREP Exercise Objectives August 9, 2016 Extent of Play Agreements for Monroe County, Wayne County and the State of Michigan Evaluation Area 1 - Emergency Operations Management Criterion 1.a.1: Offsite Response Organizations (ORO) s use effective procedures to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency personnel and activate facilities in a timely manner.

State of Michigan

1. The State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC), MSP Operations/Michigan Intelligence Operations Center (MIOC) and Field Team Center (FTC) SIM Cell will be partially activated. State personnel reporting to the SEOC will be mobilized in accordance with procedures.

2. State personnel reporting to the county Emergency Operation Center (EOC) will be pre-positioned and will report when mobilized by the SEOC (approximately 15-20 minutes after play).

3. State personnel reporting to the FTC Sim Cell will be pre-positioned and will become operational at the time determined by the scenario and controller injects (approximately 15-20 minutes after play).

4. State personnel reporting to the Joint Information Center (JIC) will be pre-positioned and will begin participation after the arrival of Monroe and Wayne Counties' JIC personnel.

5. State personnel involved in out-of-sequence demonstrations will be pre-staged.

6. A roster will be provided to demonstrate 24-hour staffing.

Monroe County

1. The Monroe County EOC will be activated and mobilized in accordance with procedures.

2. Monroe County JIC personnel will be mobilized in accordance with procedures.

3. All personnel involved in out-of-sequence demonstrations will be pre-positioned.

4. A roster will be provided to demonstrate 24-hour staffing of the county EOC.

Wayne County

1. The Wayne County EOC will be activated and mobilized in accordance with procedures.

2. Wayne County JIC personnel will be mobilized in accordance with procedures.

47

3. All personnel involved in out-of-sequence demonstrations will be pre-positioned.

4. A roster will be provided to demonstrate 24-hour staffing of the county EOC.

Criterion 1.b.l: Facilities are sufficient to support the emergency response.

State of Michigan

1. The SEOC is maintained in operational readiness and set up will not be demonstrated.

2. The JIC is not maintained in operational readiness and set up will be demonstrated for evaluation. Location: Monroe County Community College 1555 S. Raisinville Rd.

Monroe, Ml.

Monroe County This criterion will not be evaluated during this exercise.

Wayne County This criterion will not be evaluated during this exercise.

Criterion 1.c.1: Key personnel with leadership roles for the ORO provide direction and control to that part of the overall response effort for which they are responsible.

State of Michigan, Monroe and Wayne Counties

1. This criterion will be demonstrated at the SEOC, county EOC, JIC, and Public Reception.

Criterion 1.d.1: At least two communication systems are available, at least one operates properly, and communication links are established and maintained with appropriate locations.

Communications capabilities are managed in support of emergency operations.

State of Michigan, Monroe and Wayne Counties

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the SEOC, counties EOC, JIC, Public Reception and Access Control. If both the primary and back-up systems fail, this objective may be demonstrated by successful use of an alternate method of communication.

Criterion 1.e.1: Equipment, maps, displays monitoring instruments, dosimetry, potassium iodide (KI), and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations.

State of Michigan

1. Equipment, maps, displays, and other supplies will be demonstrated to support emergency operations at the SEOC, JIC, County EOC, and out-of-sequence events.

48

2. Personnel involved in traffic and access control points will demonstrate knowledge of where to secure traffic control equipment.

3. Additional supplies of potassium iodide are stored at the Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division (MSP/EMHSD) office in Dimondale. These supplies are meant to augment the county supplies.

4. Documentation related to emergency worker Kl shelf life extension is maintained by MSP/EMHSD and will be provided to FEMA at the Pre-Exercise Briefing along with instrument calibration data.

Monroe County

1. Equipment, maps, displays, and other supplies will be demonstrated to support emergency operations at the EOC, nc and out-of-sequence events.

2. Personnel involved in traffic and access control points will demonstrate knowledge of where to secure traffic control equipment.

3. Potassium iodide and dosimeters are stored at the county.

Wayne County

1. Equipment, maps, displays, and other supplies will be demonstrated to support emergency operations at the EOC, nc and out-of-sequence events.

2. Personnel involved in traffic and access control points will demonstrate knowledge of where to secure traffic control equipment.

3. Potassium iodide and dosimeters are stored at the county.

Evaluation Area 2 - Protective Action Decision Making Criterion 2.a.1: OROs use a decision-making process, considering relevant factors and appropriate coordination, to ensure that an exposure control system, including the use of KI, is in place for emergency workers, including provisions to authorize radiation exposure in excess of administrative limits or Protective Action Guides.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the Incident Management Group in the SEOC in conjunction with appropriate support staff including the TSG and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS).

2. Authorization for State personnel to exceed state exposure limits was demonstrated by the Field Team Center Coordinator (FTCC) at the FTC during the Palisades graded exercise on Tuesday April 26, 2016.

Monroe County - Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Monroe County may recommend that emergency workers ingest Kl and/or authorize emergency workers to exceed State exposure limits based on best available information, if the incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants, and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to protect emergency workers in a timely manner.

2. Any decision regarding the implementation of protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration by an agency with authority to warn and protect the public in 49

a timely manner will be documented as an "Interim Protective Measures Decision" in lieu of a "Protective Action Decision."

Wayne County-Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Wayne County may recommend that emergency workers ingest KI and/or authorize emergency workers to exceed State exposure limits based on best available information, if the incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants, and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to protect emergency workers in a timely manner.

2. Any decision regarding the implementation of protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration by an agency with authority to warn and protect the public in a timely manner will be documented as an "Interim Protective Measures Decision" in lieu of a "Protective Action Decision."

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairperson of the Regional Assistance Committee.

Criterion 2.b.1: Appropriate Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) are based on available information on plant condition, field monitoring data, and licensee and ORO dose projections, as well as knowledge of onsite and offsite environmental conditions.

State of Michigan

1. The Technical Support Group (TSG) in the SEOC will evaluate licensee and FTC Sim Cell provided information, and complete an independent analysis of scenario data.

2. Dose assessment will be conducted at the FTC Sim Cell and the results will be sent to the SEOC for further analysis during the plume phase.

Monroe County - Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Monroe County may implement protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration to warn and protect the public based on best available information ifthe incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to warn and protect the public in a timely manner.

Wayne County-Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Wayne County may implement protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration to warn and protect the public based on best available information ifthe incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants and ifthe State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to warn and protect the public in a timely manner.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairman of the Regional Assistance Committee.

50

Criterion 2.b.2: A decision-making process involving consideration of appropriate factors and necessary coordination is used to make Protective Action Decisions (PADs) for the general public (including the recommendation for the use of KI, if it is ORO policy).

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the Incident Management Group in the SEOC in conjunction with appropriate support staff including the TSG and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS).

2. The Potassium Iodide (KI) policy will be demonstrated at the General Emergency declaration through SEOC discussion and a press release at the TIC.

Monroe County This criterion will not be demonstrated by the County.

Wayne County This criterion will not be demonstrated by the County.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairman of the Regional Assistance Committee.

Criterion 2.c.1: Protective Action Decisions are made, as appropriate, for groups of people with disabilities and those with access/functional needs.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the Incident Management Group and TSG in the SEOC in coordination with applicable support staff, through the decision to recommend the use of KI to institutionalized persons that cannot be evacuated.

Monroe County - Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Monroe County may implement protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration to warn and protect the public based on best available information ifthe incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to warn and protect the public in a timely manner.

Wayne County-Does not apply unless situation warrants immediate action.

1. Wayne County may implement protective measures prior to a Governor's Declaration to warn and protect the public based on best available information ifthe incident (intentional vs. unintentional) warrants and if the State is unable to provide Protective Actions Orders to warn and protect the public in a timely manner.

Criterion 2.d.l: Radiological consequences for the ingestion pathway are assessed and appropriate Protective Action Decisions are made based on the ORO planning criteria.

51

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Criterion 2.e.1: Timely post-plume relocation, reentry, and return decisions are made and coordinated as appropriate, based on assessments of the radiological conditions and criteria in the ORO's plan and/or procedures.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Evaluation Area 3 - Protective Action Implementation Criterion 3.a.1: The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plan and procedures.

Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for emergency workers is maintained.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will not be demonstrated by the State, This criterion was demonstrated during the Palisades exercise on Monday, April 25, 2016 and Tuesday, April 26, 2016.

Monroe County

1. Monroe County will demonstrate this criterion at the access control point when emergency workers are issued dosimeters at the local EOC.

Wayne County

1. Wayne County will demonstrate this criterion at the access control point when emergency workers are issued dosimeters at the local EOC.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Criterion 3.b.1: KI and appropriate instructions are available in case a decision to recommend use of KI is made. Appropriate record keeping of the administration of KI for institutionalized individuals and general public is maintained.

State of Michigan

1. The State will demonstrate this objective at the SEOC and through decision-making and directives to implement appropriate Protective Action Orders.

Monroe County 52

1. Monroe County will demonstrate the ability (simulate) to administer KI to institutionalized individuals.

Wayne County

1. Wayne County will demonstrate the ability (simulate) to administer KI to institutionalized individuals.

Criterion 3.c.1: Protective Action Decisions (PADs) are implemented for people with disabilities and those with access/functional needs other than schools within areas subject to protective actions.

State of Michigan This criterion will not be demonstrated by the State.

Monroe County

1. This criterion will be demonstrated in the EOC via staff discussions that may include evacuation of hospitals, nursing homes, correctional facilities, mobility impaired individuals, and transportation dependent. These discussions will be documented in situation logs.

2. Actual contacts to special population groups will not be made. Simulation of calls will be logged as such.

3. Monroe County will contact a minimum of four providers of transportation services, which may include public transit authorities, school systems for buses, ambulance services, or fire/rescue services. An endeavor will be made to contact a quarter of the total number of transportation providers. There will be no discussion of scenario information during these calls.

Wayne County

1. This criterion will be demonstrated in the EOC via staff discussions that may include evacuation of hospitals, nursing homes, correctional facilities, mobility impaired individuals, and transportation dependent. These discussions will be documented in situation logs.

2. Actual contacts to special population groups will not be made. Simulation of calls will be logged as such.

3. Wayne County will contact a minimum of four providers of transportation services, which may include public transit authorities, school systems for buses, ambulance services, or fire/rescue services. An endeavor will be made to contact a quarter of the total number of transportation providers. There will be no discussion of scenario information during these calls.

Criterion 3.c.2: OROs/School officials implement protective actions for schools.

State of Michigan 53

This criterion does not apply.

Monroe County

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by Monroe County EOC as driven by the scenario.

2. An EV-2 interview will be conducted out-of-sequence at Airport School on Monday, August sth at 10:00 am.

3. Refer to the Table of Exercise Demonstrations for specific times. This will be conducted out-of-sequence.

Wayne County

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by Wayne County EOC as driven by the scenario.

2. An EV-2 interview will be conducted out-of-sequence at St. Mary's School on Wednesday, November 9th, at TBD.

3. Refer to the Table of Exercise Demonstrations for specific times. This will be conducted out-of-sequence.

Criterion 3.d.1: Appropriate traffic and access control is established. Accurate instructions are provided to traffic and access control personnel.

State of Michigan

1. This criterion will be demonstrated by the SEOC through the restriction of air, interstate, rail, and waterway access.

Monroe County

1. Decisions related to traffic and access control will be demonstrated in the Monroe County EOC. Monroe County demonstration locations will be determined during the exercise at a time agreed upon by the FEMA evaluator, the Exercise Controller, and the county Emergency Management Coordinator.

2. Staffing of all other access and traffic control points will be simulated.

Wayne County

1. Decisions related to traffic and access control will be demonstrated in the Wayne County EOC. Wayne County demonstration locations will be determined during the exercise at a time agreed upon by the FEMA evaluator, the Exercise Controller, and the county Emergency Management Coordinator.

2. Staffing of all other access and traffic control points will be simulated.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Criterion 3.d.2: Impediments to evacuation are identified and resolved.

State of Michigan This criterion does not apply 54

Monroe County

1. This will be demonstrated through discussions at the county EOC. Messages will be injected by Exercise Controllers to drive these demonstrations. Personnel will deal with the impediments by discussing the need for equipment, discussing its estimated time of arrival, etc. If the impediment posed involves road closures that would have been known to exercise participants during the course of normal operations, this information will be provided to the players as part of the initial conditions for the exercise. All contacts, actual or simulated will be logged. Information will be provided to the nc for each impediment.

Wayne County

1. This will be demonstrated through discussions at the county EOC. Messages will be injected by Exercise Controllers to drive these demonstrations. Personnel will deal with the impediments by discussing the need for equipment, discussing its estimated time of arrival, etc. If the impediment posed involves road closures that would have been known to exercise participants during the course of normal operations, this information will be provided to the players as part of the initial conditions for the exercise. All contacts, actual or simulated will be logged. Information will be provided to the nc for each impediment.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Criterion 3.e.1: The ORO demonstrates the availability and appropriate use of adequate information regarding water, food supplies, milk, and agricultural production within the ingestion exposure pathway emergency planning zone for implementation of protective actions.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Criterion 3.e.2: Appropriate measures, strategies, and pre-printed instructional material are developed for implementing Protective Action Decisions for contaminated water, food products, milk, and agricultural production.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Criterion 3.f.1: Decisions regarding controlled reentry, relocation, and return of individuals during the post-plume phase are coordinated with appropriate organizations and implemented.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Evaluation Area 4 - Field Measurement and Analysis Criterion 4.a.1: (RESERVED) 55

Criterion 4.a.2: Field teams (two or more) are managed to obtain sufficient information to help characterize the release and to control radiation exposure.

State of Michigan This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise. This criterion was demonstrated during the Palisades exercise on April 26, 2016.

Monroe County and Wayne County This criterion does not apply.

Criterion 4.a.3: Ambient radiation measurements are made and recorded at appropriate locations, and radio iodine and particulate samples are collected. Teams will move to an appropriate low background location to determine whether any significant (as specified in the plan and/or procedures) amount ofradioactivity has been collected on the sampling media.

State of Michigan This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise. This criterion was demonstrated during the Palisades exercise on April 26, 2016.

Monroe County and Wayne County This criterion does not apply.

Criterion 4.b.1: The field teams (two or more) demonstrate the capability to make appropriate measurements and to collect appropriate samples (e.g., food crops, milk, water, vegetation, and soil) to support adequate assessments and protective action decision-making.

State of Michigan This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise. This criterion was demonstrated during the Palisades exercise on April 26, 2016.

Criterion 4.c.1: The laboratory is capable of performing required radiological analyses to support protective action decisions.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Evaluation Area 5 - Emergency Notification and Public Information Criterion 5.a.1: Activities associated with primary alerting and notification of the public are completed in a timely manner following the initial decision by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation. The initial instructional message to the public must include as a minimum the elements required by current FEMA REP guidance.

56

State of Michigan

1. The State will provide information to the county for release in the Emergency Alert System messages.

Monroe County

1. Monroe County is the primary activation point for the public warning sirens. Monroe County also activates the Emergency Alert System (EAS). An interview with WJR personnel will be conducted by FEMA following transmittal ofEAS messages.

Notification to the public will be simulated.

Wayne County

1. Wayne County will provide, as needed, information to Monroe County for inclusion in EAS messages.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairman of the Regional Assistance Committee.

Criterion 5.a.2: [RESERVED]

Criterion 5.a.3: Backup alert and notification of the public is completed within a reasonable time following detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notification system.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Criterion 5.a.4: Activities associated with FEMA approved exception areas (where applicable) are completed within 45 minutes following the initial decision by authorized offsite emergency officials to notify the public of an emergency situation The FERMI IIEmergency Planning Zone (EPZ) does not contain any DHS/FEMA approved exception areas.

This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Criterion 5.b.1: OROs provide accurate subsequent emergency information and instructions to the public and the news media in a timely manner.

State of Michigan, Monroe County & Wayne County

1. This will be demonstrated at the IlC via dissemination of emergency information and instructions through joint media briefings and news release announcements in coordination with the SEOC and County EOCs. All media briefings will be conducted at the nc.

2. A public inquiry hotline will be operated by Monroe County during the exercise by personnel based at the Monroe County Emergency Management Office. Trending is performed by the Rumor Control Coordinator, who identifies trends and ensures 57

appropriate information is provided to the public inquiry operators and the JIC for inclusion in press briefings Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated as approved on a case-by-case basis by the Chairman of the Regional Assistance Committee.

Evaluation Area 6 - Support Operation/Facilities Criterion 6.a.1: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontamination, and registration of evacuees.

State of Michigan

1. State personnel will provide phone assistance as requested by the counties per the procedures in the Nuclear Facilities Emergency Management Plan during county Public Reception/Emergency Worker decontamination center demonstrations. Phone calls may be simulated through discussions with State personnel who are available in person for the out-of-sequence demonstrations.

Monroe County

1. Monroe County will demonstrate separate public reception/decontamination center out-of-sequence: Monday, August 8, 2016 6:00 PM, Whiteford High School, and Wednesday, August 10, 2016, 6:00 PM Bedford High School.

2. The capability to monitor 20% of evacuees in the 10-mile EPZ allocated to that facility over a 12-hour period will be demonstrated. 6 simulated evacuees will be monitored for demonstration. One portal monitor will be set up and the 6 evacuees monitored.

3. Dosimetry and survey instrument calibration and maintenance records will be evaluated as described under Criterion l.e. l.

4. The process for setting up the Center will not be evaluated. Set-up will occur and conclude in a reasonable time. Evaluators will observe but not interfere with the set up process at the Center prior to the beginning of the evaluated demonstration.

5. A Radiological Worker Break area will be demonstrated through discussion and will not be required to be set up. Workers will be allowed to eat and drink during the center setup period, prior to demonstration of operations. Workers may use restrooms freely during center set-up and operation.

6. Decontamination of the public and vehicles will be demonstrated through simulated actions and interview. Equipment will be set up, but no water or decontamination solutions will be used in the demonstration.

Wayne County

1. Wayne County will demonstrate separate public reception/decontamination center out-of-sequence: Thursday, August 11, 2016 1 PM, Wayne County Community College.

2. The capability to monitor 20% of evacuees in the 10-mile EPZ allocated to that facility over a 12-hour period will be demonstrated. 6 simulated evacuees will be monitored for demonstration. One portal monitor will be set up and the 6 evacuees monitored.

58

3. Dosimetry and survey instrument calibration and maintenance records will be provided as described under Criterion l.e. l.

4. The process for setting up the Center will not be evaluated. Set-up will occur and conclude in a reasonable time. Evaluators will observe but not interfere with the set up process at the Center prior to the beginning of the evaluated demonstration.

5. A Radiological Worker Break area will be demonstrated through discussion and will not be required to be set up. Workers will be allowed to eat and drink during the center setup period, prior to demonstration of operations. Workers may use restrooms freely during center set-up and operation.

6. Decontamination of the public and vehicles will be demonstrated through simulated actions and interview. Equipment will be set up, but no water or decontamination solutions will be used in the demonstration.

Criterion 6.b.1: The facility/ORO has adequate procedures and resources to accomplish monitoring and decontamination of emergency workers and their equipment and vehicles.

State of Michigan This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise. This criterion was demonstrated during the Palisades exercise on April 26, 2016.

Monroe County This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Wayne County This criterion will not be demonstrated during this exercise.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

Note: The decontamination and washing of vehicles and individuals, if detailed in the county plans, will be simulated.

Criterion 6.c.1: Managers of congregate care facilities demonstrate that the centers have resources to provide services and accommodations consistent with American Red Cross planning guidelines. Managers demonstrate the procedures to assure that evacuees have been monitored for contamination and have been decontaminated as appropriate prior to entering congregate care facilities.

State of Michigan This criterion does not apply.

Monroe County 59

1. Monroe County will demonstrate a congregate care center out-of-sequence with the exercise on Monday, August 8, 2016 6:00 PM at Whiteford High School and Wednesday, August 10, 2016, 6:00 PM at Bedford High School. Personnel operating the center will not go through alert, mobilization, activation, or shift changes. Appropriate 24/7 staffing will be demonstrated via personnel rosters, call-up lists, etc.

Wayne County

1. Wayne County will demonstrate a congregate care center out-of-sequence with the exercise on Thursday, August 11, 2016 1 PM, Wayne County Community College.

2. Personnel operating the center will not go through alert, mobilization, activation, or shift changes. Appropriate 24/7 staffing will be demonstrated via personnel rosters, call-up lists, etc.

Criterion 6.d.1: The facility/ORO has the appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination, and medical services to contaminated injured individuals.

State of Michigan During this exercise State Technical Personnel will provide phone support upon request. Phone calls may be simulated through discussions with State personnel who are available in person for the out-of-sequence demonstrations.

Monroe County Note: This criterion will be demonstrated during an MS-1 Drill Thursday, November 10, 2016 with Promedica Hospital located at 718 North Macomb Street, Monroe, MI 48161.

Wayne County Note: This criterion will be demonstrated during an MS-1 Drill Wednesday, November 9, 2016 with Beaumont Trenton, South Shore Campus Medical Center located at 5450 Fort Street, Trenton, MI 48183out-of-sequence.

Note: This criterion may be re-demonstrated immediately for credit, at the discretion of the evaluator.

60 I

I

APPENDIX F: SCENARIO TIMELINES This Appendix presents the Off-Site Scenario Timelines for the State of Michigan and Wayne and Monroe Counties that drove the FERMI IINuclear Power Plant Radiological Emergency Preparedness, Partial Participation, Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise conducted on August 9, 2016. The timelines include both On-Site events and comments, and expected Off-Site response actions.

61

Scenario Timeline

_ Iim~_ I _

Event§.

I

- SEOC Actions

-,,,- -- - f M.om*oe AcuO:n~*

_ *_

~

-- "J_~ _** _* ~--. Wayne Action l

JTC Actions 0700 Initial conditions provided to SCR.

0740. Conditions met for an Unusual Event.

0835-0850 Alert declared.

. MSP Operations notified by plant.

. Local & State

. MSP Operations notifies Sheriff Dispatch notified by plant and. Sheriff Dispatch notified by plant. nc activation begun. Utility notifications made.

MSP/EMHSD and MDEQ/DWRPS.

MSPLEIN.

and MSP LEIN.

personnel will not demonstrate A/N

. OSC, TSC, and EOF SEOC activation begun.

Dispatch notifies EM & Chairperson.

Dispatch notifies EM &

or facility setup.

activated.

. MSP Operations notifies Monroe

. EOC activation begun.

Chairperson.

. State JIC personnel pre-positioned.

. 15-minute notification and Wayne Counties.

. EOC activation begun.

update established.

. Activation ofJIC and FTC begun.

. SEOC notifies FEMA, Ontario and Ohio.

0845-. Hotline established to. SEOC operational.

. EOC activation underway.

EOC activation underway.

. Communications initiated with 0900 SEOC.

. Hotlines opened to plant and

. Hotline opened to SEOC.

. Hotline opened to SEOC SEOC.

counties.

. Notifications to counties via SEOC.

. Site Area Emergency Plant notifies SEOC within 15 1000-declared due to Loss of minutes.

1015 Clad 4A.

Notifications to counties via SEOC.

Declare State of Emergency/

Disaster.

1000-EOF operational.

. EOC operational

. nc operational.

1010. TSC&OSC RID & CCCs placed on standby.

. RID & CCCs placed on standby operational.

1135-. General Emergency 1150 (GE) declared dne to a. Plant notifies SEOC within 15 bro ken flange.

minutes.

. Sounds sirens.

. Implement PAO (if pertain to Informed of GE and PAO by SEOC.

Protective action

. Notifications to counties via SEOC.

Issues EAS message.

Wayne County)

. Informs media.

recommendation (PAR). If not done previously, declare State Implements PAO.

made to State Director.

of Emergency/ Disaster.

Evaluates PAR.

. Decides on a Protective Action Order (PAO).

62

. Issues PAO to counties.

. Issues further P AOs as needed.

1300. Plant terminates

. Exercise play terminated when all exercise play with objectives demonstrated.

State.

May terminate independently.

Exercise play terminated when all objectives demonstrated.

May terminate independently.

63 Exercise play terminated when all objectives demonstrated.

May terminate independently Exercise play terminated when all objectives demonstrated.

May terminate independently.

This page intentionally left blank.

64

ML16365A035

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Reference:

Navigation menu

Search