ML18324A584

Final After Action Report, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise July 31, 2018

ML18324A584
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	11/02/2018
From:	US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML18324A715	List: ML18324A583 ML18324A584
References
Download: ML18324A584 (48)

Text

, ~-,w * * ,-.,- .. P -*-

1 Final After Action Report I Brunswick Nuclear Plant I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise I Exercise Date: July 31, 2018 I November 2, 2018 I  ;.::,r~n,.~"~\ FEMA

(

1

:J ~Ii d

I \~<".

• ,~'1ND ~\\~/

"""t.,,,,.,,.,..,....

I

I

, I I

l l

1 Final After Action Report I Brunswick Nuclear Plant I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise I Exercise Date: July 31, 2018 I November 2, 2018 I

I Radiological Emergency,Breparedness Program*

I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant*

Table of Contents I Page I Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 Section 1: Exercise Overview ......................................................................................................... 7 I 1.1 1.2 Exercise Details ............................................................................................................. 7 Exercise Planning Team Leadership ............................................................................. 7 1.3 Participating Organizations ........................................................................................... 8 I Section 2: Exercise Design Summary ........................................................................................... 11 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design ....................................................................................... 11 2.2 Core Capabilities and Exercise Objectives .................................................................. 11 I 2.3 Scenario Summary ....................................................................................................... 13 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities ............................................................................................... 15 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results .................................................................................. 15 I 3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation .................................................................... 15 3.3.l State ofNorth Carolina .................................................................................... 16 3.3 .1.1 State Emergency Operations Center. ............................................. 16 I 3.3 .1.2 3.3.1.3 Eastern Branch Office - Regional Coordination Center ................ 19 Emergency Operations Facility ..................................................... 20 3.3.1.4 Joint Information System ..... :......................................................... 20 I 3.3.1.5 Waterway Warning/Clearance ....................................................... 21 3.3.2 Risk County Jurisdictions ................................................................................ 22 I 3.3.2.1 3.3.2.2 Brunswick County ......................................................................... 22 3.3 .2.1.1 Emergency Operations Center ..................................... 22 New Hanover County .................................................................... 24 I 3.3.2.2.1 Emergency Operations Center ..................................... 24 Section 4: Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 27 Appendix A: Exercise Timeline ................................................................................................... 29 I Appendix B: Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders .................................................................. 31 Appendix C: Extent-of-Play Agreement ...................................................................................... 33 I

I I

I I 3 I

Radiological Emergen:ey Preparedness Program I After Action Report , 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

I I

I I

I

,' ,,I

-' ~). ;

I I

_1:'his page is intentionally blank I

I I

I I

I I

I 4 I I

I Radiological EmergencY'P,reparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Executive Summary I The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program staff evaluated a plume exposure pathway I exercise for the 10-mile emergency planning zone of the Brunswick Nuclear Plant on July 31, 2018. Those evaluative observations as well as out of sequence activities conducted July 9-13, 2018 are included in this report.

I The Brunswick Nuclear Plant is operated by Duke Energy and is located near the City of Southport in southeastern Brunswick County, North Carolina. The 10-mile emergency planning I zone encompasses portions of both Brunswick and New Hanover Counties.

The purpose of the exercise was to assess the level of state and local preparedness in responding I to an incident at the Brunswick Nuclear Plant. It was conducted in accordance with Federal Emergency Management Agency's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of state and local radiological emergency response plans and procedures. The previous federally evaluated I exercise was conducted on July 26, 2016. The original qualifying emergency preparedness exercise was conducted November 13, 1981.

I Officials and representatives from participating agencies and organizations demonstrated knowledge of their emergency response plans and procedures and successfully implemented them during the exercise and out of sequence activities. Alljurisdictions met their exercise I objectives and successfully demonstrated the corresponding core capabilities identified in Section 2.2 of this report. During this exercise, the Federal Emergency Management Agency I evaluation team did not identify any level 1 or level 2 findings.

Officials and representatives from the State of North Carolina, Brunswick and New Hanover I Counties, National Weather Service, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Duke Energy, as well as numerous volunteers and other agencies, participated in this exercise. It was apparent during the exercise that a great deal of training and practice was I conducted by the offsite response organizations to successfully demonstrate the ability to provide support and resources as necessary to the Brunswick Nuclear Plant. Both Brunswick and New Hanover Counties used this exercise and out of sequence activities to enhance their current level I of preparedness and more importantly, bolster services to the access/functional needs community.

I The Federal Emergency Management Agency staff wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals who participated in the exercise and made it a success. The professionalism and teamwork of the participants was evident throughout all phases of the exercise.

I I

I 5*.

I

Radiological Emergeney Preparedness Program. I After Action Report.. 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

I I

I

• \ ,I ,' ,., '

I

• .1.

I I

I

. This.page is intent~op.ally blank I

I I

I I

I I

I 6 I I

I Radiological Emergency-Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Section 1: Exercise Overview I 1.1 Exercise Details I Exercise Name 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise I Type of Exercise Functional I Exercise Date(s)

July 31, 2018, with out of sequence activities July 9-13, 2018 I Program Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I Mission

Response

I Locations I See Appendix C, extent-of.-play agreement for exercise locations Scenario Type I 1.2 Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise Exercise Planning Team Leadership I Mr. J.T. Ackermann DHS/FEMA RIV Mr. DeShun Lowery DHS/FEMA RIV I North Section Chief 3003 Chamblee-Tucker Road Atlanta, Georgia 30341 Site Specialist 3003 Chamblee-Tucker Road Atlanta, Georgia 30341 I

I I

I I T I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program* I After Action Report Mr. James Young 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Mr. John Wisner I

REP Program Manager North Carolina Emergency Management State Exercise. Officer North Carolina Emergency Management I 1636 Gold Star Drive 1636 Gold Star Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 Raleigh,,North Carolina.27607 I

Ms. Diane Curtis Mr. Kent Crocker Eastern Branch Office Manager 3802 Highway 58 North, Suite B Kinston, North Carolina 28504 Emergency Pr_ep;:tredness Manager

. Post Office Box 10429, BNP 04. I Southport, North Carolina 28461 Mr. Brian Watts Mr. Steven Still I

Director birect~r of.E{n~rgency Management/911 Brunswick County Emergency Services Post Office Box 249 New Hanover C_ounty EM 230 Government Center Drive, Ste.115 I

Bolivia, North Carolina 28422 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 1.3 Participating Organizations I

State of North Carolina I Office of the Governor Department of Public Safety

• Division of Emergency Management I

• State Highway Patrol Department of Environment Quality

• Division of Marine Fisheries, Marine Patrol I

• Division of Water Quality, Law Enforcement .*

Wildlife Resources Commission

• I Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Department of Transportation I

• Division of Highways

• Ferry Division I Department of Health and Human Services

• Division of Health Service Regulation, Radiation Protection Section I

• Division of Public Health

• Office of Emergency Medical Services I Risk Jurisdictions Brunswick County, North Carolina I

8- I I

I Radiological Emergency Rreparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant

• Board of Commissioners I

• County Manager's Office o, Public Information

• Emergency Services I o Emergency Management o Emergency Medical Services (EMS) o Fire Marshal ' '*

I *

. o Volunteer Center' Department of Social Services

• Health Department I

• Sheriffs Office o Communication~ - 911 Center o Public Inf~rmation ' ;

I

• Schciolbistrict

• Department of Transportation I

• Public Utilities * * '

Operations Services ~. .:.* ..:,

• Southport Police Department

'I

• Oak Island Police Department Boiling Spring Lakes Police Department

• Bald Head Island Public Safety I

• Leland Volunteer Fire Department New Hanover County, North Carolina I

• Department of Emergency Management o Response Emergency,Management Organization o Public Safety Communications ,<=enter (911)

I o Emergency Public Information Center

• Assistant County Manager I

• Public Information Office.

• Department of Social Services

• Fire Rescue I

• Sheriffs Office

• City of Wilmington Police Department

• City of Wilmington Fire Department I

• Schools

• Department of Transportation

• Town of Kure Beach I

• Town of Carolina Beach

• Cape Fear Public Utility Authority

• Department of Health I

I 9 I

Radiological Emergeney Preparedness Program I After Action Report Federal 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector N9rth Ca~olina I United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

... National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, }Jational We_atherService I

. N(m-:Governmental Organizati.ons

. , _,Radio Arnat_eur Civil Em~rgenqy Servjces/Amateur Radio E~e~ge~cy Servic~s I i\m,erican ~ed Cross, .Cape_ Fear Chapter.,.

. , Duke Energy*, ,. . , .

, ,The .Salyation A,np.y , I' I * * :.

I

t. ,.i

_I

c*l I

I I

'.!I I

I I

I I

i  ;

I

~

I 10: I I

I Radiological Emergency Breparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Section 2: Exercise Design Summary I 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design I The Federal Emergency Management Agency administers the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program pursuant to the regulations found in Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations parts 350,351,352, 353, and 354. 'fitl'e 44 Code of Federal Regulations 350 I codifies sixteen planning standards that form the basis for radiological emergency response planning for the licensee and for state, tribal; and local governments* impacted by the emergency planning zones established for each imclear power plant site in the I United States. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations. also codify the sixteen planning standards for the licensee. Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations 350 sets forth the mechanisms for the formal review and approval of state, tribal, and local I government radiological emergency response plans and procedures by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. One of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program cornerstones established by these regulations is the biennial exercise of offsite I response capabilities. During these exercises, affected state, tribal, and local governments demonstrate their abilities to implement their plans and procedures to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency at the I nuclear plant.

The results of this exercise, together with review of the radiological emergency response I plans, and verification of the periodic requirements set forth in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, along with supplements through the annual letter of certification and staff I assistance visits, enabled the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide a statement with the transmission of this final after action report to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, that the affected state, tribal, and local plans and I preparedness are: (1) adequate to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of the nuclear power facility by providing reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiological emergency; and (2)

I capable of being implemented.

Formal submission of the State of North Carolina and involved local jurisdictions of the I radiological emergency response procedures for the Brunswick Nuclear Plant was on July 15, 1981. Formal approval was granted by FEMA on March 17, 1982, and the qualifying emergency preparedness exercise occurred August 17-19, 1981.

I 2.2 Core Capabilities and Exercise Objectives I Core capabilities-based planning allows for exercise planning teams to develop exercise objectives and observe exercise outcomes through a framework of specific action items.

Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program methodology, the I exercise objectives meet the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program requirements and encompass the emergency preparedness evaluation areas. The critical tasks to be demonstrated were negotiated with the State of North Carolina and the I 11 I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant participating counties. The core capabilities scheduled for demonstration during this I

exercise were:

I

• .**Operational Coordination: Establish and maintain a unified and coordinated operational structure and process that appropriately integrates all critical stakeholders and

• supports the execution of Core Capabilities. I Situational Assessment: Provide. all decision makers with decision-relevant information 1 regarding the nature and, extent *of the hazard:, any cascading effects, and the status of the I

response.

I ,

Public Information and Warning: Deliver coordinated; prompt, reliable, an.d ;,*

I actionable information to the whole community through the use of clear, consistent, accessible, and culturally and linguistically appropriate methods to effectively relay

, infonhation regarding any threat or .ha~ard and, as appropriate, the actions being ,taken I

.and the assistance being made available: *

': *'* '.. ,= i *.,*_.\:

On-Scene Security, Protection, and Law Enforcement:* Ensure a safe and secure I

environment through law enforcement and related security and protection operations for

. people and communities located within affected areas and also for response personnel

. engage9in'lifesaving and life-sustaining operations. ; '*

I These :core capabilities, when successfully demonstrated, meet the exercise objectives.

• The objectives foHhis exercise were as follows:

I Objective 1: Demonstrate the ability to provide direction and control and make protective action decisions through the state emergency operations centers, county I

emergency operations centers, and field activities by exercise play and discussion of plans and procedures. I Objective 2: Demonstrate the ability to physically implement protective actions for State and County emergency workers, access/functional needs, schools and the public through exercise demonstration and discussion of plans and procedures.

I Objective 3: Demonstrate the ability to conduct independent dose assessment, management of field teams, and mobile or fixed laboratory analysis in response to a I

radiological release.

Objective 4: Demonstrate the ability to activate Prompt Alert and Notification System I

(PNS includes sirens & EAS, back-up route alerting) and Emergency Alert System (EAS) through exercise play. I Objective 5: Demonstrate the effectiveness of plans, policies, and procedures in the joint information system for public and private sector emergency information communications. I 12 I I

I Radiological Emergency :Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant 2.3 Scenario Summary I The following is a summary of the licensee's scenario. This scenario and supporting documents*were adequate for the:demonstration.ofthe exercise objectives and associated I *. technical criteria identified in the extent of play agreement.

The exercise began at 0800. At approximately 0809, a tube rupture occurred on the feed I ,. water heater. At 0813, the spurious closur.e of a main steam isolation valve occurs

• resulting ih a reactor scrariL This closure o£the main steam isolation valve results in a small-break loss of coolant accident inside primary containment. At 0815, .drywell I pressure increased above 1. 7 pounds per square inch. Conditions exist to declare an Alert emergency dassification level; loss of reactor coolant system barrier,:,-. , ...

I The feed water heater isolation:tJypass valves fail to open during an attempt to align condensate for reactor inj:ectionat 0945. Dryw'eltradiation monitors exceed,2,000 R/hr.

Conditions exist to declare an emergency classification level of Site Area Emergency I . based on loss of fuel cladding barrier and reactor coolant system barrier. With the Site Area Emergency declaration, the loss ,of coolant accident leak rate increased. >

• I ' , At 1149 drywell radiation monitors' exceed 20,000 R/hr. Drywell conditions Jxist to declare an emergency classification level General Emergency based ori the potential loss of containment barrier and loss of other two barriers. Meteorological conditions were I *. winds at 4 mph from 158 degrees with,a stability class E*and*no forec;asted chang*es. At 1218, a seal leak from residual heat removal pumps result in a radiological' release' 1218 through the stack.

I I

I I

I I

I ,. . '

. ; \ (:;/.* ,.-,* ., !,

I I

Radiological Emergerfoy Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant, I

I I

I I

I I

I This page is intentionally blank I

I I

I I

I I

I 14 I I

I Radiological Emergency Rreparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities I 3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results I This section contains the. results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the July 31, 2018, plume-exposure-pathway exercise and out of sequence activities.

I Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated based on the demonstration of core capabilities, capability targets and critical tasks, and the underlying Radiation Emergency I Preparedness criteria as delineated in the Federal Emergency Management Agency Radiation Emergency Preparedness Program Manual dated January 2016. Exercise crit~ria are listed by number and the demonstration status of those criteria are indicated I by the use of the following terms:

• M: Met (no unresolved level 1 or level 2 findings assessed and no unresolved I

• findings from prior exercises) 1: Level 1 finding assessed I

• 2: Level 2 finding assessed or an unresolved level 2 finding(s) from a prior exercise P: Plan issue N: Not demonstrated ,

I 3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation I The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program evaluation methodology is an analytical process used to assess the demonstration of specific capabilities during an exercise. A capability provides a means to perform one or more critical tasks under I specified conditions and to specific performance standards. Core capabilities form the foundation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program evaluations. The core capability summaries below I provide an overall combined assessment of state and local jurisdictions based upon their collective demonstrated performance as it relates to the specific core capability. Each jurisdiction's standalone capability summaries are listed in Section 3.3 of this report.

I Operational Coordination: Key leadership personnel from different agencies established and maintained a unified and coordinated operational structure which I provided effective direction and control. Overall, the decision making process integrated all critical stakeholders which enabled protective action recommendations to be thoroughly understood. The decision making process allowed for consideration of I relevant and appropriate factors, with protective action decisions made in a sensible and timely manner.

I I lS I

Radiological Emergeriey Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Situational Assessment: State dose assessment personnel successfully demonstrated the I

.ability to independently assess radiological and plant conditions. County and state decision makers were provided with relevant and accurate .radiological information by I state* dose assessors throughout the demonstration. The information allowed decision makers to understand the extent of the hazards and cascading effects, *and to make the appropriate protective action decisions: I Public Information and Warning: The risk jurisdictions aided by the State of North

• Carolina effectively demonstrated the activation of the primary alert and notification I system. Additional emergency information and instructions were provided to the public and media using a joint information system process, which was defined and supported by each jurisdiction's emergency operations center. These process~s -enabled* coordinated, I prompt, and reliable information to be delivered to the public and media..

.1 ..

On-Scene Security, Protection, and Law Enforcement: The,U.S. Coast Guard and I

state and risk county law enforcement representatives demonstrate.d the ability to coordinate and implement appropriate traffic\fud access 'control operations and'to' conduct coordinated operations to clear the.waterways, beaches, and parks.within.the 10-I mile emergency planning zone of the Brunswick Nuclear Plant. This was demonstrated out of sequence during a facilitated/training tabletop exercise. I 3.3 . Jurisdiction.al Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation

• 3.3.1

,..., 1: :

State of North Carolina I

3.3.1.1 State Emergency Operations Center-* I Operational Coordination Capability Summary:.

The North Carolina State Emergency-Response Team successfully demonstrated the I

ability .to conduct response operations and direct resources in support of the risk counties surrounding the Brunswick Nuclear Plant.

Notification of the em~rgency at the Brunswick Nuclear Plant was received by the state warning point, with key staff being notified*and responding to the state emergency operations center in a timely manner. The Duke Emergency Management Network was the primary communications system for notifications from the utility and coordination with stakeholders. Redundant communication systems were in place if needed, and all operated without fail. There was ample space, equipment, and supplies to support the I

response activities associated with this exercise, with same demonstrated during real world emergency activations. '* ~ '*. . .

I The North Carolina State Emergency Response Team .leader immediatelY,estal5lished direction and control of the state emergency operations center staff, and kept the staff I informed of evolving conditions through frequent situatfoiJ. briefs. State perdodnel' 16' I I

I Radiological Emergency P,reparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant effectively used and coordinated all available information to support the protective action I decision making process for the public and emergency workers alike. Potassium iodide for the public and emergency workers was discussed among the North Carolina State Emergency Response Team and the risk counties. Law enforcement personnel discussed I their ability to coordinate and manage impediments at traffic control points in tlie risk jurisdictions. Throughout the exercise, a unified, coordinated; and collaborative.

operational response and support structure was maintained.

,I For this capability the following radiological emergency preparedness criteria were MET:

La.I, l.c, 1, 1.d. l, 1.e: 1, 2.a. l, 2.b.2, 3 .a. I, 3 .d.1, 3 .d.2 ....

I . a. . Level J Finding:

• None I b. Level 2 Finding: None

. ;. c. Not Demonstrated: None. ,

I d. Prior Level 2 Findings,_ Resolved: None' ..

' * ' '*I ' * *,,

, e. Prior Level 2 Findings - Unresolved: *None

,i I

\'

Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:

Public information officers demon*strated their; ability tO'.provide emergency, information .

• I and instructions to the public and media. The public information officers, in conjunction with the risk counties and Duke Energy, established a joint information system*and disseminated information in a manner consistent with the protective action decisions.

I Media briefings were relevant, timely, and accurate; The State and counties each.

established public inquiry systems. Public inquiry personnel provided accurate and timely information to the public and shared information received- from the *public with I each other so that they could identify trends and address rumors. Pre-scripted Emergency Alert: System messages were chosen on the. decision line, modified: by the lead risk county, and: broadcast were simulated by staff in the state emergency operations center.

I State staff were also responsible for activating the tone alert radios through the National Weather Service. Residence within the two mile radius of the plant are provided tone I alert radios by the utilities. The siren systems were notionally activated by .the risk counties after coordination with the state.

I For this* capability the following radiological emergency preparedness criteria were MET:

5:a.L, 5.b.l.

I

• a.: -Level l Finding: None *

b. Level 2 Finding: None I :c. :Not Demonstrated: None d:'. ;l>i*ior Level 2 Findings -

.:, , ,( , **r*. '

Resolv~d: None

.. * . . i.

I 17 I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

e. Prior Level 2 Findings - Unresolved: None Situational Assessment Capability ,*.~ummary: I North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Service Regul~tfon: Radiation Protection Section personnel successfully dem~nstrated the ability_

to as'se~s}adi9logical and plaµt conditions and to provide appropriate recommendations I

to dec'isfon makers iri. response to' a radiofogi~al incident ~tthe Biiinswick Nuclear Plant.

' . . ,:,', .. *,. ' 1. * ,:  ! :.* ..* : .. ' .

.. Jhe do*s~ assessm~p.t leader calculate~ projected doses at varicrµs distances downwind I

froin the plant based on plant conditions, release data supplied by the utility' and field team measurements. All projected offsite doses were well below protective action

~ides; therefore, all recommendations: were b~secl ~n, pJant. co11ditions .. Pers<?nnel also I

monitored plant data and parameters frori1 the utility's plaij.t d,ata system anc;l discu~*sed

. the dat~*with.utility persomuf. The Radiatjpri Prot.e,cti.on Section Chiefbriefed state and county, decisiqn'111~ker's'. presentitjg protec#vfadion ~eco~pien~ations.an,d the reasoning 1

I for those recoi:ni:neridations. .' , .' , ' . .. ' .

1

,_Following.the* start o:fthe ~adfolog{cal rel~~se, dose projections: prepa~ed by'th~ ~tility and I

Radiation Protection Section personnel indicated that radioactive iodine was p;ese~t in th~ ph;me, \Vhich w,as later confirmed by field team a~r samples. Although the I concentratiori 'of radioactive iodirie in the plume was very 1low~ in accordance with

.procedm~s; the Radiation Protectio~ Section Chi~:forde're d field team members to ingest

• ' p~fassit'irii iodjde_ ancl r~ccmimende1 that potassium' iodide be ingested by an e~ergency I workers iri the lO~inile'emerge#cy planning zone .. However, since projected thyroid doses ,,offsite were well below protective action guides,' the Radiation Protection Section Chief did not recommend that members of the public ingest potassium iodide.

I I Radiation Protection Section personnel were farililiar with administrative ~nd tum back dose limits for field personnel. The Radiation Protection Section State Emergency I Response Team coordinator stated that only the Radiation Protection Section Chief or the State Emergency Response Team leader could authorize state personnel to exceed"the limits.

I For this capability the following radiological emergency prepa'rednes~ criteria ~ere MET:

2.a.1, 2.b.l, 2.b2.

I

a. Level 1 Finding: None

b. Level 2 Finding: None I

c. Not Demonstrated: None

d. Prior Level 2 Findings - Resolved: None I

e. Prior Level 2 Findings - Unresolved: None I 18* I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 3.3.1.2 Eastern Branch Office - Regional Coordination Center 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I Operational Coordination Capability Summary:

I . The North Carolina Emergency Management Eastern Branch Office staff demonstrated the capability to inanage the region~l coordination center by activating pers'6nnel to

.. esfablish and maintain aun1fied and coordinated response. The Eastern Branch Office I . * ' transitioned to become the Regional Coordination Center - East upc,h activation under the direction of 'the

"' 'i '

Eastern Branch Incident Commander.

Staff effectively managed

deploym,ents, tracki,ng and coordination ,of resou~c.~s foru~et neegs and stakeholc,ler I ' actions. ' . ' ' . . '

• f*

rv1u1tip1e cbnumui.icati6ns systeins ~ere readily *a:v~i1ab1~ ~d'allowed for. 66nn~ctivity I _***** ac~oss th~,*e~st~rn N6rth Carolina ar~a~. j'he Duk:e. E~ergency Ma~agbri~~t ~~twork

';, ., syste*m; a dedicated line' that connected the' state; counties, and utility; was used' for'

'J :* i -: ***decisi~nmaking and confer~n:dng. **voice :bv~i Ibteniet Pt~tcicol_phones and satellite I phones were used as secondary and backup communicatid'ri, with'800-inegahertz* radios and Radio, Amateur Radio Elllergency System ham radios a,so avaiJable. Both wireless and wired internet connections were readily available* and ~n 9Jierate~ Without fail.

I '<, <  ;  ; ,- * ) I ,'*.

The facility had suffici~tj.t.spa~e, supplies, and~quipment.tci *support.~irie{gbncy response operations for an extended period of time'. Ther~ were bathroom apd fee:di'ng facilities to I sustain long'-temi operations, food cµ1d water'sµpplies:bn hand, ~d natlli"~i gas ana diesel generators for ba.ckup powef. Computer-based resource request aricftracking programs,

.with large overhel:!,d displays; relevant to the emerge;ncy were ori display,' as well as I ' various maps and other status boards. '

.\ '  ! . * ~ * ' _i * *.

• ' i I

_ For this capability the follqwing radiological emergency preparedness criteria were MET:

I .

• l.a.l, l.c.l,).d:f; J:~.*L . ,, . ' . . . . ... ' ...

a. Level 1 Finding: None .

I ,, *.

b. Level 2 Finding: None I c. Not .

Demonstrated: None

d. Prior Level 2 Findings - Resolved: None

e. Prior Level 2 Findings - Unresolved: None I

I I

I I

Radiological Emergericy Preparedness Program I After Action Report

• 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

3.3.1.3 Emergency Operations Facility

. *OperationalCoordination Capability Summary: I Radiation. P.rotection Section 'and Division of Emergency Management representatives successfully demonstrated liaison: functions: Liaisons were dispatched to the. Duke. I Energy emergency operations facility in Charlotte,. North Carolina, for dose assessment, field team monitoring, and emergency management. The liaisons assisted the state and

.county emergency operation centers.in-the decision-making processes and necessary I

• coordination to make protective action.decisions for the general public ..

The liaisons provided timely and correct information to their Duke Energy counterparts.

I The emergency management liaison,participated in'conference calls among Brunswick Nuclear Plant, the state, and risk counties. The liaisons transmitted all emergency*

classification level changes and updates, emergency notification forms, protective action I

recommendations, meteorological conditions, plant status information, dose pn!ljections, and field team results to the appropriate personnel in the epie,rgency operatio:r;is,ce11ters.

They provided the emergency operations facility personnel with* state/county . '

I precautionary actions, evacuation impediments, protective action .decisions, and potassium iodide ingestion decisions. . Duke Energy, the U.S.

. * . I. . . * *.

Nu~learRegulatory Commission, and state personnel were cooperative and responsive* in sharirig information I

and providing feedback to improve the overall process and functions.

For this capability the following radiological emergency preparedness* criteria were MET:

I 2.b.l.

a. Level 1 Finding: None I

' b.'. Lev~l 2* Filidirig: N~11e l I ' ."

c.. Not Demonstrated:. None I

. d. .Pri~r Level 2 Findings ~Resolved:. None

e. Prior Level 2 Findings- Unresolved: None I

3.3.1.4 Joint Informatiop System "J *- I I

Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:*

A joint information system was established and participants activated'.a coordination I

bridge line to support public information and warning activities. The joint information system was led by the New Hanover County and Brunswick County public information

,istaff, in coordination with North Carolina Emergency Management, Duke En.ergy; and I

the,US. Nuclear Regulatory-Commission. , , :. ' ... , * * '

I

20. I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant When protective action decisions were made, public information officers from New I Hanover County, Brunswick County, and North Carolina Emergency Management promptly and accurately communicated those decisions to all joint information system participants on the coordination bridge line. Risk county public information officers then I developed relevant and accurate:news releases using the one-message one-voice concept.

All approved news releases.,were coordinated amongst the joint information system participants .in accordance with plans *and procedures.

I As previously stated, some participants were unable to fully participate in the.media briefings. The observed challenges would not have endangered the health and safety of I the public, nor would it have restricted the media from receiving public information.

. , For this c::apability the following radiological emergency preparedness criteria'were MET:

I 5.b.l:

':*ca. Level 1 Finding: None .

I b.. Level. 2 Finding:. None ..

c. Not Demonstrated: None , ,

I d. .Prior Level 2 Fin~i~gs -: Res~lved: None '.

. * *l . ' * \"

e. Prior Level 2 Findings - Unresolved: None I 3.3.LS Waterway Warning/Clearance .

I On-Scene Security, Protection, and Law Enforcement Capability Summary:

The State of North Carolina and supporting agencies successfully demonstrat_eq. alert, I notification, and evacuation of the Cape Fear River and the surrounding marine areas within the 10-mile emergency planning zone of the Brunswick Nudear Plant. *This action was performed during a multi-agency tabletop exercise attended by representative~ from:

I the U.S. Coast Guard, Marine Envir~nmental Protection; North C~ofina Emergency Management; North Carolina Marine Patrol; North CarolinaDepartinent of Transportation Ferry Division; Brunswick County Emergency Services; Brunswick I County Sheriffs Office; New Hanover County Emergency Management;New Hanover County Sheriffs Office; Wilmington Police Department; Kure Beach Fire Department; I Carolina Beach Fire Department; and the,Carolina Beach Police,Department. Each of the above agencies had a portion of the emergency planning zone in their jurisdiction or a significant support role. ,,.

• 1* ,* ... , r

• I North.Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Law Enforcement, and Brunswi9k

.* Emergency Services would have established an incident command post in the warehouse I which is connected to the Emergency Operations Center.Appropriate equipment, supplies, and communications were available for distribution. All pai1icipants were knowledgeable in their use of personal dosimetry and administrative exposure limits.

I 21 I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

For this capability the following radiological emergency preparedness criteria were MET:

. 1.a.1, l.d*.1, l.e.l; 3.a.l, 3.d.l, 3.d.2 ... I a.. Level l.Fin~ing: None

. b. L~vel 2 Findirig: N6ne I

c. Not Demonstrated: None

.d: .Prior Level . 2* Findings .- Re~olved: None I

e. Prior Level 2 Findings - Unresolved: None I

3.3.2 Risk County Jurisdictions 3.3.2.1 Brunswick County I

3.3.2.1.1 Emergency Operations Center I Operational Coordination Capability Summary:

Brunswick County Emergency Services personnel and support staff successfully I

demonstrated their ability to integrate all critical stakeholders into a .functional emergency operati9n center. I Due to Brunswick County Emergency Operations Center renovations, a temporary facility was established for this exercise. The facility was set up with redundant methods of communication and adequate, equipment, supplies, plans, and displays to support the I

operation:* ..Information technology personnel established :and maintained connectivity and communication capabilities throughout the exercise. This allowed all participants to

• *,

• remain operational and to coordinate response actions with stakeholders. The mobile I

• command post was located outside of the facility to supplement capabilities-if the need

. arose .. By using this facility, Brunswick County demonstrated their ability to be flexible and remain resilient when planned facilities are unavailable.

I Emergency operations center staff were notified and mobilized in an efficient manner

. using an electronic notification system,*. Leadership kept staff informed of incident status I

and response actions by providing regular briefings and facilitating round table*

discussions. *As the lead risk county, the Brunswick County Emergency Services Deputy Director facilitated decision line calls to discuss protective actions. Appropriate

• I protective action decisions were coordinated over the decision line and concurred upon by all stakeholders prior to implementation: Although different decisions wer~ made for

• • school elosures .and; emergency worker potassium iodide ingestion, they were ,still*\

I

• : : coordinated and understood: by all involved parties.

• Emergency operations center staff were familiar .with their plans and responsibilities.

I 22 I I

I Radiological Emergency l?,reparedness Program I After Action Report

• 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant They used position-specific checklists to accomplish their duties with little need for I guidance. or direction. Law enforcement representatives established and managed traffic and access control during the emergency to support evacuation. Individuals with access and functional needs and school personnel were contacted early in the response so that I staff could assess and arrange needed resources for an evacuation. An appropriate exposure control system was in place for emergency workers and they were promptly notified of protective actions. * *  ; *  :

I For this capability the following radiological emergency preparedness. criteria were MET:

1.a.1, 1.c. l, 1.d. l, 1.e.l, 2.a. l, 2. b.2, 2'.c. l, J.a. l, 3. b. i; 3 .c.l, 3 .c.2, 3.d. r ,* 3 :d.2 I a. Level 1 Finding: None I b. Level 2 Finding: None

c. Not Demonstrated: None I d. Prior Level 2 Findings - Resolved: None

e. Prior Level 2 Findings - Unresolved: None

.r; I Public Information and Warning Capability Summary

Brunswick County Emergency Services staff successfully demonstrated their. ability to I deliver coordinated, accurate, and actionable information to the :public: This was demonstrated in part through their participation in the joint information system.

I The alert and notification system, which consisted of sirens, the Emergency Alert System, and tone alert radios, was notionally.activated twice during the exercise. New Hanover County activated sirens on behalf of Brunswick County since they were

• I operating out of a temporary facility. Brunswick County's siren activation-console was fully functional at .the. primary emergency operations center and was available* if needed.

Pre.iscripted Emergency Alert* System messages were, modified by Brunswick County and I coordinated with New Hanover County and the state. The state was then responsible for initiating the Emergency Alert System. Tone alert radios were activated by the National Weather Service at the state's request. Backup alert and notification of the public was I successfully demonstrated as an out of sequence activityi The demonstration was

• completed by a member of-Brunswick County Emergency Services *after notification of a I simulated failure of siren B3. The dispatched emergency worker was trained on dosimetry and potassium iodide, knew the route, and after being dispatched, successfully completed it within a timely manner.

I The public information officer coordinatedthe formulation of three press releases with all involved, stakeholders. She maintained frequent coordination with her counterparts-.in the I joint information system via a conference bridge line, which was established and remained open for the entire exercise. All messages were reviewed and approved by the Brunswick

. County.Em,ergency Services Director and-Deputy Director before being distributed to media I 23 I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

- outlets. The,citizen phone bank staff fielded public inquiry calls;*_they used information gathered from the safety information brochure, press releases, and emergency operations

-center staff to provide accurate information and instructions to callers.

• I For this capability the following radiological emergency preparedness criteria were MET:

5.a.1, 5.a.3, 5.b.l. I

a. Level l Finding: None

b. Level 2 Finding: None I

c. Not Demonstrated: None

d. Prior Level 2 Findings - Resolved: None I

e. Prior Level 2 Findings - Unresolved: _None,

,' , ' I I 3.3.2.2 New Hanover County ,, i,;

3.3.2.2.1 Emergency Operations Center  ;.. l I

Operational Coordination Capability Summary: - I The New'Hanover County Emergency Management staff successfully demonstrated the capability.to establish and maintain an operational .structure and process that appropriately integrated all county stakeholders. Staff utilized the county's electronic I

notification system to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency operations center personnel for activation of the facility in a timely manner. I The New Hanover County staff used the Duke Emergency Management Network as the primary-means of receiving information from the Brunswick Nuclear Plant and for coordinating protective action decisions .. Multiple communication systems were .

I available and operated without fail. The facility had ample space, supplies, and equipment to support 24-hour emergency operations, * - I County leadership .-participated .in decision line calls to* discuss protective actions.

Appropriate protective action decisions' were coordinated over the decision line and concurred upon by both the, state and Brunswick County prior to implementation.. Based I

upon relevant and specific local factors, New Hanover County leadership decided to relocate school staff and students, and chose not to direct emergency workers to ingest potassium iodide as Brunswick County* and the state had.

I

.:The Director of Public Safety for New Hanover County Schools was interviewed -*

concerning relocating the one school in the LO-mile emergency planning zone. New I

--- ,Hanover County had a comprehensive plan, which provided guidance.to school* c ,

administrators and support staff on emergency and crisis proceduresi. New Hanover County's Radiological Officer discussed the co1µ1ty' s, ability to manage radiological I

24 I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant exposure to emergency workers in accordance with established plans and procedures.

I

• The mass care representative discussed how they would prepare and provide support to residents with access and functional needs. New Hanover County Sherims deputies demonstrated thorough knowledge of the procedures for managing traffic control points I and the clearance of impediments. *

• For this capability the following radiological emergency preparedness criteria were MET:

I l.a.l, l.c.1, l.d.l, l.e.l, 2.a.l, 2.b.2, 2.c.l, 3.a.1, 3.b.l, 3.cd, 3.c.2, 3.d.l, 3.d:2 1/

a. Level 1 Finding: None I b. Level 2 Finding: None

c. Not Demonstrated: None I d. Prior Level 2 Findings - Resolv~d: None

e. Prior Level 2 Findings - Unresolved: None I Public Information and Warning Capability Summary:

I County public information staff successfully demonstrated.their ability to provide '

accurate emergency information. As part of the joint information system, they

, coordinated with the public informatiqn officers from Duke Energy, North Carolina I Emergency Management, and Brunswick County. News releases w:ere reviewed and

• approved by the* New Hanover County: Emergency Management Director or Deputy prior

• to being disseminated to the public.

I Social media/rumor control was effectively managed, which ensured that the information contained in approved news releases were immediately restated in social media I

• 1 platforms. Public inquiries were.properly addressed 'by using the news releases and the Brunswick Nuclear Plant safety brochures.

I *

• I ,

• New Hanover County demonstrated asimulated*activation of the siren system and participated in the coordination of Emergency Alert System messaging with both I Brunswick County and the state. Brunswick County would normally have the .

responsibility to ~ctivate sirens; however, dueto:Brunswick County operating from a temporary facility for this exercise, that responsibility was delegated to New Hanover I County ..

New Hanover County Fire Rescue Station #19 personnel successfully demonstrated I backup route alerting in the event of siren failure as an out of sequence activity. Fire Rescue personnel deployed five vehicles; each assigned.a different location within the

• alerting zone.

• Each vehicle completed their primary assigned routes within a timely I manner. Using a map of the area, the fire chief equipped the emergency worker teams with their do'simetry equipment and assigned areas of responsibility for each.* Each

• vehicle/team had a pre-written script to announce over the speaker system.

• The I 25~

I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

emergency workers were knowledgeable about dosimetry, exposure limits and requirements for ingesting potassium iodide.

I FQr this .capability the following radiological emergency preparedness criteria were MET:

5.a.,1, 5 ..~.3, 5.b.l. -

I

a. Levell .Find~g: None b: Lev~l'2 Finding: None I

c. Not Demonstrated: None

. *: d; Prior Level 2 Findings'..:.. Resolved: Nohe

' ** 1 .;,, -

I

. e. _Prior Level 2 Fi~ding~ ... Um;esolved: None_

.rr l ': /;

I

,' ,I i. '

. '\:

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

26: I I

I Radiological EmergencyPreparedness Program*

I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Section 4: Conclusion I Overall, the exercise was a success. All five exercise objectives were met and no level 1 or 2 findings were noted. Officials and representatives from the State ofNorth Carolina, the risk I counties of Brunswick and New Hanover, Duke Energy, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as well as many other agencies and numerous volunteers, participated in the exercise. The response organizations and volunteers demonstrated knowledge:df th:'eir*

I emergency response plans and procedures and successfully implemented them.. The. ~c;>0p~ration and teamwork of the participants was apparent throughout all evaluated _an~ trainiJ?-g activities.

{*:*

I The role of the Brunswick Nuclear Plant TaskJorce in ~~he<;luli11g;~nd co.µducting the necessary improvements identified in previous exercises was instrumental in the success of the state's corrective action program and ultimately the exercise:; Aoditiona1ly, a*highlight 'of this exercise I was the focus on protecting the health and safety of the access/functional needs population re,lative to mass care services.

I The Federal Emergency Management Agency wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals who participated and made this exercise a success.

I I

I I

I I

11 I

I I 27' I

Radiological Emergen~y Preparedness Program I

After Action Report

• 2018 BrunswickNuclear Plant I

I I

I I

I I

• . I I

' This page is intentionally blank

\ -; .

I I

I I

I I

I I

28 I I

---

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Appendix A: Exercise Timeline Brunswick 2018 Emergency. Classifica,tion.

Time *.

Utility:

.. Time That Notification Was Rec~ived or Ac'tioniWas*Taken' .. ',

• Level or Event.: : *

<<) ,* **. Declared NCSERTI Radiation Protection, Brunswick County New Hanover County Joint Information

-- -,,-. Dose Assessment Eastern Branch EOC EOC System*

Unusual Event NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Alert 0835 0838 0852 0855 0851 0848 NIA Site Area Emer!!encv 0947 0953 0954 0956 0953 0952 0950 General Emer!!encv 1154 1159 1159 1201 1200 1158 1158 Simulated Rad. Release 1154 1146 1159 1159 1201 1200 1158 Started Simulated Rad. Release Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Terminated Facility Declared Operational 0914 0915 0915 0858 0914 0900 0920 Transfer of Direction &

NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Control to NC SERT State 1057 NIA NIA 1057 1057 1057 Declaration of State of Brunswick 1000 NIA NIA 1000 NIA 1000 Emergency New Hanover 1040 NIA NIA NIA 1040 1040 Exercise Terminated 1332 1337 1337 1340 1336 1337 1332 1st Protective Action Decision:

Stay Tuned 1008 NIA 1008 1008 1008 *1104 1st Siren Activation 1015 NIA 1015 1015 1015 NIA 1st EAS Messae:e 1019 NIA 1019 1019 NIA 1st NWS Messae:e 1030 NIA 1030 1030 1030 NIA 2nd Protective Action Decision:

Evacuate Zones: 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 1210 1210 1210 1210 1210 *1336 Shelter in Place Zones: NIA 2nd Siren Activation 1224 1224 1224 1224 1224 NIA 2nd EAS 1229 1229 1229 1229 1229 NIA 2nd NWS Messae:e 1239 1239 1239 1239 1239 NIA KI Ingestion Decision: 1236 1252 1237 1252 NIA Emergency Workers - Ingest General Public - No Issue NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA

• Times are based on press release times as entered in NC SPARTA.

29

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

I I

I

• ' ~ ' i ' . .{ i : ~ .-; -~ ' .,

I

,' I : f ','

I I

1 '.

I This page is intentionally 'blank I

I I

I I

I I

I 30* I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Appendix B: Exercise Evaluators and Team Leaders I Regional Assistance Committee Chair: Randall L. Hecht I North Section Chief: JT Ackermann Site Specialist: DeShun Lowery Exercise Support: Melonie McGuire-Johnson (FEMA)/ Christy Bennett (ICF)

I Technical Team Lead: Joe Harworth Public Information Team Lead: Glenda Bryson I Location EYahiation*Team

. Statetof NorthTarolina -:Directtjr:. Mike ,Sprayberry, ;. *  ;

Capability & Activity .

,s' McLemore*, Lewis, Operational Coordination I SEOC NCEM Eastern Branch Office Rice Dolder Public Information and Warning Operational Coordination I Dose Assessment FMT Management (training)

Fill Campbell Situational Assessment Environmental Response/Health and Safety I FMT Red (training)

FMT Blue (training)

Harworth*

Ward Environmental Response/Health and Safety Mobile Laboratory (training) Earnshaw Environmental Response/Health and I Emergency Operations Facility Leatherman Safety Situational Assessment Operational Coordination Alternate EOF/Duke Media Center I Waterway Warning/Clearance, TCP Bryson*

Public Information and Warning Public Information & Warning and Park Clearance (OOS) Ackermann, Dolder, Lowery On-Scene Security, Protection and I 0

• Risk CO\lnty: BrunswickCounty-:.Director: Brian Watts ..:

LE

*.* *,.., '* *.. ,, *} .

.. ' ,,

Operational Coordination I EOC Bradley*, Lowery, Nemcheck Public Information & Warning Critical Transportation Backup Route Alerting (OOS) Nash Public Information and Warning I RCCC (OOS) (training)

McLemore, Nash, Lowery, Dolder Environmental Response/Health and Safety Mass Care I Risk County'.: New Hanover:- Director: Stevefr Still:

Operational Coordination I EOC Backup Route Alerting (OOS)

Seward*, Nash, Ivy Dolder, Lowery Public Information & Warning Critical Transportation Public Information and Warning I *denotes team lead

,I 3'1 I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

I I

I

. :"*., r. ,'

I I

. .'.i ";i *.::

I

'.. \\  ;

I This page is intentionally'blank

.. { . . *'

I I

I I

I I

.. . '. . '~-

I I

32 I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Appendix C: Extent-of-Play Agreement I Brunswick Nuclear Power Plant I 2018 FULL PARTICIPATION RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE I All activities will be demonstrated fully in accordance with respective plans and procedures as they would be in an actual emergency. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

I Regional Office must receive these plans, guides and procedures at least 60 days before the exercise. This Extent of Play Agreement (EOP A) is written by exception. If it is not listed as an exception it will be demonstrated as described in the plans, standard operating guides (SOGs) and/or procedures (SOPs). Any issue or discrepancy arising during exercise play may be re-I demonstrated if allowed by the Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) Chair or as listed herein.

This allowance may be granted if it is not disruptive to exercise play and is mutually agreed to by the Offsite Response Organization (ORO) Exercise Controller and FEMA Evaluator. Some.

I activities are requested to be performed as a training-only opportunity, and are identified in the participant description.

I Core Capability: Operational Coordination Critical Task: OROs use effective prqcedur~s to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency I a personnel and activate facilities in timely manner (Criteri'on 1.a.1 ).

Performance Measure: Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to receive notification, contact, alert, and mobilize key emergency personnel in a timely manner, and I demonstrate the ability to maintain and staff 24-hour operations.

Local responders must demonstrate the ability to receive and/or initiate notification to the I respective emergency management organizations of an incident in a timely manner when they receive information from the licensee or alternate sources.

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the activation of facilities for immediate use by mobilized I personnel upon their arrival.

Participants:

NC EM (SERT/SEOC, Eastern Branch, JIC/JIS), Brunswick and New Hanover I Counties Note: Participants will not be allowed to enter their assigned exercise location prior to receiving activation/notification in accordance with plans and procedures.

I Critical Task: Key personnel with leadership roles for the Offsite Response Organizations (ORO) provide direction and control to that part of the overall response effort for which they are I responsible (Criterion l .c.1 ).

Performance Measure: Leadership personnel must demonstrate the ability to carry out essential management functions.

I Leadership must demonstrate the ability to prioritize resource tasking and replace/supplement resources.

I 33 I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant .

I

Participants:

NC EM (SERT/SEOC, Eastern Branch), Brunswick and New Hanover Counties

. Note: Brunswick County is the lead coordinating county until/if the State is requested to assume direction and control.

I Brunswick County EOC Emergency Management Office New Han~ver County EOC Emergency Management Office I 3325 Old Ocean Highway . 220 Government Drive Building C **

Bolivia, North Carolina 28422 Wilmington, North Carolina,28405 Date: 31 July 2018 , I Date: 31 July 201,8 TiP]e: 8:00 am Time: 8;:0D

~

• State of North Carolina EOC NCEM Eastetri Branch Office * *. .,; '.\ .

I 1636 Gold Star Drive )80~ Hjghway 58 North, ,

Raleigh, NC 27607 Date: 31 July2018 Suite B Kinston, NC 28502 . *.. '!.

I Time: 8:00 am Date: 31 July2018 Time: 8:00 am

~ ' . l

.. ~ ., ......

I Ag1*ee Critical Task: Equipment, maps, displays,,monitorin~ instruments, dosim~try, Kl, and other; supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations (Criterion l.eJ).

• . *, ' ==.' ' *l' ' ,_ . . ' .

I Performance Measure: Responsible OROs mustdemonstrate capability to maintain inventories .

of KI sufficient for use by: emergency workers, institutionalized individuals, where stipulated by plans, rnenibers oftransientpopul~tions/general public within plume pathways (EPZ)

I Dosimetry: Sufficient quantities of appropriate direct_-reading and permane,nt-record dosimetry and dosimeter chargers* must be available for 'issuance to all emergency workers. ORO must'. * * *.

I demonstrate provisions to make dosimetry available to specialized response teams Monitoring Instruments: All instruments must be inspected, inventoried, and operationally*'.

checked before each use. For Field Monitoring Team (FMT), instruments must be capable of I

measuring gamma exp6~ure rates and detecting beta radiation' . . .. .

Participa~ts: NC EM_(SERT/SEOC,_Eastern Branch, JIC/J~S), NC Radia\ion Protection, I

Brunswick and New Hanover Counties , . . . . .

Brunswick County

• The SAV schedule is as follows:

New Hanover County I

Location: Emergency Management Office 3325 Old Ocean Highway Location: Emergency Management Office 220 Government Drive I Building C . Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Bolivia, North Carolina 28422 Date:* May 10, 2018

• Date: June 14, 2018 Time: 2:00 pm I

Time: 2:00 pm I

I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report Agree *

• 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I Critical Task: . OROs use a decision-making process, considering relevant factors and

• appropriate coordination, to ensure that an exposure control system, including the use* of KI, is in place for emergency workers, including provisions to authorize radiation exposure in excess of I administrative limits or protective action guide.s. (Criterion 2.a. l) * ' * ,*

Performance Measure: OROs authorized.to send emergency workers into the plume exposure I pathway EPZ must demonstrate a capability to comply with emergency worker exposure limits based on their emergency plans/procedures.

Participating OROs must also demonstrate the capability to make decisions concerning I authorization of exposure levels in excess of pre-authorized levels and the number of emergency workers receiving radiaticm doses a,.bove pre.,authorized levels.

I

Participants:

NC EM (SEOC), Brunswick and New Hanover Counties Note:

I Agree

• • I Critical Task: A decision-making process involving consideration of appropriate factors and necessary coordination is used to make PADs for the general public (including the I recommendation-for the use of KI, if ORO policy)'(Criterioh 2.b.2).

Performance Measure: OROs must have the *~apability to make both initial a~d subsequent . I I precautionary and/or protective action decisions.

OROs must demonstrate the capab,iiity t~ make i~itial precautionary ~md/~r protective action decisions in a timely manner appropriate to the 1ncident. . * , ' ** . * **

I

Participants:

,NC EM (S.ERT/SEQC), Bruris"':1ckand ~ew Hanover Counties Note: NC RPS will only make recommendations/or PADs and PARs I Agree*

Critical Task: Protective action decisions are made, as app~optiate, for groups of persons with .

I disabilities and access/functional needs (Critedon 2.c.1 ).

Performance Me~sure: OROiwill be expected to make a d~cision 0~ the ~eed for a PAD I (evacuation and/or sheltering), considering appropriate factors, atid necessary coordination.

Participants:

NC EM (SERT/SEOC), Brunswick\md New Hart~ver Counties I Note:.*

Agree I Critical Task: OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI and manage radiological ,exposure to__EWs in accordance with the plans/procedures. EWs periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or chart. OROs I maintain appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI to EWs (Criterion 3.a.1).

Performance Measure: OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide emergency workers (including supplemental resources) with the appropriate direct-reading and permanent-record I 35:

I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report ,. 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant

• I dosimetry, dosimeter *chargers, KI, and instructions on the use of these items. For evaluation*

purposes, appropriate direct~reading dosimetry is defined as*dosimetry that allows an individual(s) to read the a&ninistrative reporting limits that are pre-established at a level low I enough.to consider subsequent calculation of Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) and maximum exposure limits, for those emergency workers involved in lifesaving activities, contained in the ORO's plans/procedures. I

Participants:

NC EM, Brunswick and New Hanover Ccmnties.

Note: I Agree.

Critical Task: KI and appropriate instructions are available if a decision to. recommend use .of

• I KI isJ;nade. Appropri~te_re9,ord-:keepti;ig of the administratio11 of KI for.institutionaliz~d , ,,, ,

indiviqual's'an_d1heg~n,eralp1Jblicis:mainfained(Criterio~3.b.l).,

I * . I ,: : ! ' ' l '  ; * ' l ,  ! ,

Performance Measure: OROs must demonstrate the capability to make KI available to ',, "' *::; , *.

~ , J J

• f' ;'

I inst~t\1tionaHzed in9ividuals a~d, \:\'here provided.for i11 their plans/procedures, to ,tnemb~rs of thy .

gerieraipubli.c*.' ,:_/ .*'*:*,::,*,* _*' .'>. 'i,*' :,.* ',**.i,,*, \ * ' . * * ..* , * . * ' , * : : , , I OROs must demonstrate the capability to accomplish. distribution ofKI consistent with decisions*.

made. ,***:_*- i OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists of institutionalized individuals who .

I have ingested KI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s) they were instructed to';,

ingest KI. . '*.,*.;" I

Participants:

Bi;uns~~ck and New 1Ianover Cpunties_ . i.:.. /'

Not~: Management.Aspect/coup.ties oply *,

Agree 1

• • ; * * ,

• r ' , .

I

• , * , i

• 1'  ;, *  ; *' . ' I '

Critical Task: ,Pre9aution.zj, and/or protective adion decisions are 1rripJe111ei;ited o;r persons . .:.

with disabilities and acc*ess/functional needs othe'r than ~chools withi,n. arefls.~ubject to pr~tective

/  ; ,' , .' , '*

I actions. (Criterion 3.c.l). ,* *' * * * ' ** *

• Performance Measure:* Applicable OROs must demonstrate the capability to alert and notify

" . \ ...

I (i.e., provide P ARs and emergency information and instructions to) persons with disabilities and

• access/ functional needs, including hospitals/medical facilities, licensed day cares, nursing homes, correctional facilities, and -

mobility-impaired

. ~ - . . '

and transportation-dependent individuals.* I OROs must demonstrate the capcibility to proyi~~ for persons with disabilities and access/functional needs in accordance with plans/procedures.

fi I

Participants:

Brunswick and New Hanover Counties Note: Management Aspect/Counties Only ;.

)' .

I Critical Task:.*. OROs/School officials implement protective actions and/or:protective actions.for, schools (CriterionJ.c.2). * : ,

I I

'.1' '. .*

36 I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Performance Measure: School systems/districts (these include public and private schools, I kindergartens, and preschools) must demonstrate the ability to implement precautionary and/or protective action decisions for students. The demonstration must be made as follows: Each ..

school system/district within the 1O,.mile EPZ must demonstrate implementation ofprotective, I actions.

Participants:

Brunswick and New Hanover Counties I Note: Management Aspect/Counties Only Agree I Critical Task: Appropriate traffic and access control is established. Accurate instructions are provided to traffic. and access control personnel. (Criterion 3;d. l ).-

Performance Measure: OROs must demonstrate the capability to select; establish, and staff '

I appropriate traffic and access control points consistent with current conditions ind P ADs (e.g., .

evacuating, sheltering, andxelocation).in a timely manner:

to .and I ORo's 'must den:ionstrate the capabiiity :to provide irtstructions traffic actds *conirol staff .

on actions to take when modifications in protective action strategies necessitate chalig~s 'in *

• evacuation patterns or in the area(s) where access* is controlled. '* .. ,. * (.

I

Participants:

NC EM (SERT/SEOC), Brunswick and New Hanover Counties No.te; M~~ageiheri.t.Aspect dniy ..

I Agree Critical Task: Impediments to evacuation are identified arid resolved (Criterion 3'.d.2) ..

I Performance Measure: OROs must demonstrate the capability to identify and take appropriate actions concerning impediments to evacuations. In demonstrating this capability, the impediment I must remain in place during the evacuation long enough that re-routing of traffic is required and

• must also result in demonsttat1on of decision-making and coordination with the JIS to

• communicate the alternat~ route to evacuees'.- ' ' ' ' '

I

Participants:

NC EM (SERT/SEOC), Brunswick and Nyw Hanover Counties

• j *, * '

Note: Manage,ment Aspect qnly

. : ** *

• _;  ;* ,: .( *  :

• I Agree Core Capability: Situational Assessment I Critical Task: Appropriate protective action recommendations* (P ARs) are_ based* on available

• information on plant conditions, field monitoring data; arid licensee and ORO dose projections,

• as well as knowledge of onsite and offsite environmental conditions. (Criterion2.b. l).

I Performance Measure: During the initial stage of the emergency response, following notification of plant conditions that may warrant offsite protective actions, the ORO inust demonstrate the capability to use the appropriate means described in the plans/procedures to

• I develop PARs for decision--makers based on available information and recommendations provided by the licensee, as well as field monitoring data if available. The ORO must also * , .

consider any release and meteorological data provided by the licensee.

I 37.

I

Radiological EmergeRcy Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant The ORO must demonstrate a reliable capability to independently validate dose projections I

Participants:

NC SEOC, Brunswick and New Hanover Counties Note: NC RPS will only make recommendations for PADs I

Agree Critical Task: A decision-making process involving consideration of appropriate factors and I

ne~~s~ary coorqin~tion is used t9. mcjke PAl)s for the_general public (inciuding the recommendation for the use of KI, if ORO polfoy)°(Criterion 2:b.2).

I Performance Measure: OROs must have the capability to make both initial.and subsequent precautionary and/or protective action' decisions. . . '  : .. / . . . . .

OROs must demonstrate the capability to make initial precautionary and/or protective action* : *,'

I decisions in a timely manner appropriate to the incident.

Participants:

NC SE.OG, Brunswick anq.N~w,Hano.ver.Counties

• * * " l * ' * * ' , ' * ' * ~ * ' *

• I Note:: NCRPS will only,make recommen:dationsfor PADs

. ' -~ I

• Core Capab~lify: Pu-blic Information :and Warilin'g Criti~al Task:' ORQs us.e effective proced~res to alert, n~tify ,_ and. ino.bilize emergency I person1.1ei ~nd activati fasilitiesjn a timely manner(Criterion 1.a. l). . . .

Performance Measure:, Responsible ORO must demonstrate the capability to receive notification of an incident from the licensee; verify the notification, contact, alert, and mobilize:

I key eme~gency perso~~l in atir;nely manner, and dempnstrat~ the ability_ to maintain and staff ..

24-hour operations. - . . *- . - . .. , . . . -*: ' - . I Local responders 'must.demonstrate the ability to receive and/or initiate 'notification to the licensees or other respecHve organizations in a t1mely manner.. -. '

Responsible OROs must demonstrate the activation of facilities for imril~diate use by mobilized I

personnel upon their arrival.

Participants:

NCEM, Brunswick and New Hanover Counties I

Note: Participants may be prepositioned in proximity to their assigned response locations.

Participants will not be allowed to enter their assigned exercise location prior to receiving I activation/notification in accordanc,e with plans and procedures.

Agree I Critical Task: At least two communication systems are available, at least one operates properly, and 'commliniCation liliks. are established ~nd maintained with appropriate loca:tiohs. .*. . . .

I Comniu'nicaticms capabilities are managed in support of emergency operations. (Criterion 1.d.1)

(1 ** \ ' '

Performance Measure: OROs must demonstrate that a primary system .and at least one backup .

system are fully functional at all times. * ' * * * * *; - I JS I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant

Participants:

NC EM, Brunswick and New Hanover Counties I Note:

Agree I Critical Task: Equipment, maps, displays and other supplies are sufficient to support Joint' Information System (JIS) operations (Criterion l .e. l).

I Performance Measure: For non-fadlity-basedoperati~ns, the equipment andsupplie~must be sufficient and consistent with the assigned operational role. * -

I Partic.ipants: NC EM (JIS), Brunswick and New H~over Co~nties Note:

I Agree Critical Task: Primary alerting ahd notification' or the *~ublic are completed*in a timely manbJr I following the initial decision by authorized offsite emergency officials to ri.otify,the public of an .-

emergency situation. (REP Manual-Exhibit 11-3) (Criterion 5.a.l).

Performance Measure:., Resp~msible OROs mµst demo:i;istrate the capability to activate I established protocols for bro~dcasting emergency .instructions f~om an EOC to the public through identified broadcast stations and systems. The initial instructional message io the;public:must :

• include, as a minimum, the elements required by current FEMA REP Guitlance with a sense of * .

I urgency and_ without UJ1due delay. (REP Manual-Planning*Stand_ard E-:Notification,-Methods and:

Proc~dures) ,

I Particip~nts:' NC EM (SEOC, NWS Wilniingtonj, Brunswick and New Hanover*Cdunties Note: North CarolinaJIS staff or designee will c;liscuss procedures for the formulation, approval, I release, receipt, acknowledgment/validation and broadcast of an EAS message.

EAS 1µ.~ssage will be generated not broadcast~d.

I Note: EAS messages will not be released to the media or the public. EAS Messages will only

• be sent to the NWS. Once the EAS Message is posted in the NCSPARTA Significant Events Board, the EAS message will be considered released. . . - . ,

I Agree Critical Task: Backup Alerting of the public is completed within a reasonable time following I the detection by the ORO of a failure of the primary alert and notification system (Criterion 5.a.3).

I Performance .Measure: Demonstrate the backup phys{c~l me;;tris of alert and notifi~ation ~r'th~ *-

general;public in exception ~eas or areas of system alerting fail;ure, according to local pl~I1S and/or procedures. . . . .

I Participa~t's: Brunswick and Ne; Hanover Counties Note:

I 39 I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report Agree 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

Critical Task: Ensure OROs provide accurate emergency information and instructions to the public and the news media in a timely manner (The responsible ORO personnel/representatives I

demonstrate ac;tio11s to. d}sseminate the appropriate informatiop/instruptions with a sense of .

urgency and without undue d~lay) (REP Manµal-Exhibit 11-:3) (Criterion 5.b.l).

• *"' * *. * .r '

I Performance Me~sure: The responsib\e ORO personp.el/representatives must demonstrat~.

actions to provide emergency)nfo~tion and instructions to the pµblic and me~ia in a timely manner following the initial alert i;i.nd notification (not.subject '

to specific time

' ' .. requirements).

I

Participants:

NC EM (SERT(SEOq, JICS/JIS);Brunswick and Ne_wHanover Counties ;, . ,

Note: Publ1c messaging wfll not- h*ereleasedto the media cfrthe public. Once tne News Rele~s:e *.

1 I

is confirmed to have**been posted in the NCSPARTA PIO Board, the message Will be considered:.

released.,

' *, ' .~ ' *. ,*1 *

.,..; ,, , , I Core Capability: Environmental Response, Health and Safety Note: Field teams and/or r.esponders. a,~e ri~t' to erite~ ~oTiO *i~stallati~~

I I

Critical Task: OROs use effective procedures to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency ,f',

personnel and activate facilities in a timely manner. (Criterion l.a.l) '

Performance Meastir~: .* Responsible ORO rimst demonstrate the capability to receive ;

• notification of an incident from the licensee; verify the notification, contact, alert, and mobilize key emergency personnel in a timely manner,'and demonstrate the ability to maintain and staff*

I 24-hour operations.

Local responders must demonstrate the, ability to receive and/or initiate notification to the I

license~s or other re~pective 'organizations in.a timely mamier.' . . .

Responsible OROs must demonstr:ate. the _activi;i.tion of facilities for in:nnediate use by mobilizeq, personnel upon their arrival.

I

Participants:

NC RPS Field Team Management Note: Training wili' be cond~cted*and documented to accommodate this critetiori.',

I

~

I

' * < ! r, I : ' ' , I r ! ,

• I , , ,

Agree CriticalTask: ORO's shalliestablish reliable primary and backup means oftommunicatiohs for*

licensees, local and state response organizations. These communication systems should be

• compatible with one f,mother. (Criterio~ l.d.1}

I Performance Measure: OROs must demonstrate that a primary communications -~ystem and. at .

least one backup communications system are fully functional at all times. I Parti~ipanis: NC RPS Field *T~a~* M~agement Note: Training will be conducted and documented to accommodate this criterion. I Note: This will be a Courtesy Evaluation 40 I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report

• 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Agree I Critical Task: Equipment, maps, displays*, monitoring instruments, dosimetry, KI, and other supplies, are sufficient to support emergency operations (Criterion l .e. l ) ..

I Performance Measure: For non~facility-based operations, the equipment and supplies must be sufficient and consistent with the assigned operational role. ' ' '

KI: Responsible OR.Os must demonstrate capability to maintain' inventories ofKl sufficient for I use by: *emergency workers, institutionalized individuals; where stipulated by plans, members of transient populations/general public within plume pathways '(EPZ) -

I Dosimetry: .*Sufficient *quantities of appropriate direct-reading and permanent-record.dosimetry and dosimeter chargers must be available for issuance,to all'emergency workers. ORO must , ,

demonstrate provisjons to make dosimetry available to specialized, ~esponse' teams. ' ' '

I Monitoring Instruments: All instruments must be inspected, inventoried, and operationally checked before each use. For FMT, instruments must be capable of measuring gamma exposµre, .

rates and detecting beta radiation * * .,,

I

Participants:

NC RPS Field Team Ma~ag~'inent and Brunswick County Note: Training will be conducted ~d docu~ented to;accommotlate this crited.o~.

I Note: This will be aCourt~syEvaluation * *-

Note: A prop may be utilized for Perm31\ent-Record Dosimetrr,.and ,KI issucwc,e.throu~h<;mtt~~

I training.,

Note: NC RPS FieldTeams will show storage,ofKl I Agree Critical Task: *oROs issue appropriate dosimetry,' K( and procedures, ~d ~anage*radiol~gi<::al ,

I exposure to EWs in accordance with the plans/procedures. EWs peri6dically*and at the end of each m1ssi6n read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate exposure record or '

chart. OROs maintain appropriate record-keeping of the administration-0fKI to EWs (Criterion I 3.a.l).

Performance Measure: OROs must demonstrate the capability to provide emergency workers (including supplemental resoun.~'es) with the appropriate direct-reading and permanent-record ' '

I dosimetry, dosimeter chargers, KI, and instructions on the use of these items.

Parti~ipants: NC RPS Field Team Management, Fi~ld Monitoring Teams (FMT), and Mob,ile. -

I Radiological Laboratory -

Note: Training will be conducted and documented to* accommodate this criterion.

I 1

Note: This will be a Courtesy Evaluation * '*

• Note: A prop will be utilized for Permanent-record Dosimetry and KI issuance thro{ighout the training. ' * *

• I I 41 I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I

Agree Critical Task: Field teams (two or more) are managed to obtain sufficient information to*help.

characterize the release and to control radiation exposure (Criterion 4.a.2).

I oh*

Performance Measure: Responsible OROs must demonstrate the capability to briefFMTs predicted plume location and direction, plume travel speed, and exposure control procedures

• before deployment. Teams must be directed to take measurements at such locations a:nd times *as I

necessary to provide sufficient information to characterize the plume and its impacts.

Participants:

NC RPS Field Team Management (FMT) .

I Note: Tt~ining will'be conducted and doc~~nted to accommodate thi{ critetio,n..

Note: This will be a Courtesy Evaluation, I

Agree Critical Task: Ambient radiation measurements are made and recorded.at-appropriate locatipn~ *.

.... 1::

I and radioiodine and particulate samples are collected. Teams will move to an appropriate low- .

background location to determine whether any significant (a:s specified in' the plan and/or * *' '* * .*

procedures) amount ofradioactivity has been collected on the sampling media (Criterion 4.a.i:./* I Performance Measure: Two,or more FMTs must demonstrate the capability to make and report me~surement~ of at11bient radiation to the fielc;l team coordinator,. dose assessment t~am,.or *

 ***

• J
• 1.,.

other appropriate authority." I FMTs must also dem9~str~t~ the capability to obtain an air sample for ,measur~me.nt of air;boqie .. radioiodine and.particulates,_*and to provide th,e appropriate authority with field data p~rtaining to I measurement * ** * * * * * '* * * *

Participants:

NC RPS Field Monitoring Teams (FMTj . I Note: Training ~ill be cond~ct~d and. documented to accommodate th{s *critericm. Note: This will be a Courtesy Evaluation I Agree Critical Task: The laboratory is capable of performing required radiologfoal analy-~es to support' protective action decisions. (Criterion 4.c. l)

• I Performance Measure: The laboratory staff must demonstrate the capability to follow appropriate procedures for receiving samples, including logging information, .preventing I

contamination of the laboratory(ies), preventing buildup of background radiation due to stored.* samples, preventing cross contamination of samples, preserving samples that may spoil (e.g., , *. milk), and keeping track of sample identity. In addition, the laboratory staff must demonstrate I the capability to prepare samples for conducting measurements.

            '..*.o.    '      '* ,   I Participant~: NC RPS Mobile Radiological Lab
                                           '.   * .. ;,_   *1 ,:..   * **    *  .         '

I Note; '\r~ainirig *will be provided and documented to acco~odate this criterion. Note: This will be a Courtesy_Ev~luation I 4:2** I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report

• Field Monitoring Team & Mobile Laboratory Staging Area 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant
• I Location: New Hanover County Warehouse 1623 Hewlett Drive, Wilrn,.ington, NC 28401 I Date:, 31 Juiy2018 .

Time: 8:00 am. I Agree Critical Task: The reception center facility has appropriate space, adequate resources, anc;L , , trained personnel to provide monitoring, decontaII}ination, me~ical services, and registration of I evacuees (Criterion 6.a. l ). . , . . . .. . . . Performance Measures: Each reception center should be'laige enough to p~ovide "the necessa;y. I services to accommodate 20 percent of the population of the jurisdiction.

Participants:

, Brunswick County I Note; Thfs will be.a Courte,sy Evalriaticm

                                                                                       )   '

I

• Core Capability,*. Critical Transportation ,

CfiticaiTask:' 'OROs/Schoofofficials implenient protect1:v;e act10:ns and/or protective actions for schools (Criterion 3.c.2). * *, * *: ** : * * * ** ', I .** *, . .* . , * ,, ' * ,, *' ,... * .  : '

• Performance Measure:* 'Demonstrate the ability' to implement precautionary' and/or protective ..

acHon* aedsions* for students in 1the different levels ofeducation within the judsciiction: * . * * *:

                                                                                                       .       )I     *.-,, *  .   .     *.

I

Participants:

Brunswick and New Hanov{?r. Counties Note: Consider including ..public .and*: private

                                                                . i! ~   . I schools, kindergartens and preschools.

I Note: No child/adult care facilities will be interviewed Note: Management Aspect Only I Brunswick County EOC Emergency Management Office New Hanover County. EOC Emergency Management Office 3325 Old Ocean Highway 220 Government Drive I Building C .*. Bolivia, North Carolina 28422 .: ' i ,

                                                                              ; Wilmington,.-North Carolina28405
                                                                             ,: Date: 31 July 2018 Date: 31July.2018,                                                             Time:* 8:00*am I Time: *8:00 am I                   Core Capability: On-Scene Security, Prote:dio~ an_d Law Enforce~ent NOTE: This core capability will be validated as courtesy evaluation during a scheduled I discussion.

Participants:

Waterway Warning - U.S. Coast Guard, NC Wildlife, NC Marine Patrol; MOTSU, NC State Parks and Aquarium, Wilmington Police Department, Brunswick County and I 43: I

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I New Hanover County agencies. Critical Task: OROs use effective procedures to alert, notify, and mobilize emergency: personnel and activate facilities in a timely manner. (Criterion 1.a.1) I Performance Measure: Responsible ORO must identify the capability to receive riotification of an incident from the licensee;, verify the notification, contact, alert, and mobilize, key emergency, personnel in a timely manner, and the ability to maintain 24.:.hour operations. Local responders, I must have the ability to receive and/or initiate notifis~tion to theJicensees Qr other respective organizations in a timely manner. I Note: Agree I Critical Task: At least two communication systems are available, at least one operates properly} and comniunicatfon links are established arid maintained with appropriate' locations.' ,; ' Communications capabilities are mariaged in support of emergency operations. (Criterion Ld:1)-' ,

                                                                                                                                   ' ';: : '            I Performari'~e' Me'asiire:' .OROs backup System'ai~*'fully'functional at all times: ,',,
 . .* ** . '* .: . ; * : ; : ;' : ; : . ' *-:' .' ~ ; *:

rriust have kriowledg'e that a primary ;y~tem and at least orie ';: ,'

                                                          .* . ; . : . ~- l ! ': . . f \ ,
                                                                                             ,, "  I                              ,  'i      ,'., , .
                                                                                                                            * ; ' . . ) f ' ' ;

I Note:,, , 11'

                                                                                                                                             . ';  \ ~.

I Critical Task: Equipment, maps, displays, monitoring instruments, dosimetry, KI, and othe~ , supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations (Criterion l .e. l). Performance Measure: For non-facility-based operations, the equipment and supplies must bit* I sufficient and consistent with the assigned,ope1;ational role: , KI: Responsible OROs must have knowledge bf where inv~ntorres* of KI are* maintained for 'use ' I by: emergency workers, institutionalized individuals, where: :Stipulated by plans, members of' ; - transient populations/general public :withiri plume pathways (EPZ). . Dosimetry: Sufficient quantities of appropriate direct-reading and permanent-record dosimet~y

                                                                                                                ,                                       I and dosimeter chargers must be available for issuance to all emergency workers.

Monitoring Instruments: All instruments must be inspected, inve~toried, and operationally I checked before each use and reflect this maintenance. ' Note: I Training Interview Location: Duke Energy 1623 Village Road NE Location: Duke Energy 1623 Village Road NE I Leland, NC 28451 Leland, NC 28451 Date:.)uly 11, 2018* Time: 8:00 am Date: July 11, 2018 Time: 8:00 am I I 44 I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Agree I Critical Task: OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to EWs in accordance with the plans/procedures. (Criterion 3.a.l). I Performance Measure: OROs.must identify the capability to provide emergency workers.(EW)' * (including supplemental resources) with the appropriate direct-reading and.permanent-record dosimetry, dosimeter chargers, KI, and instructions on the use of these items. I EWs should recall the procedure relating to reading and *recording findings on the appropriate ** exposure record or chart. OROs maintain appropriate record-keeping of the administration of Kl

• to EWs.

I Note: Agree. I Crhicai Task: Appropriate traffic l:_lnd ac~ess ,control is e~tabl~shed. Accurat~ instructions.~~~.*. ; pro\;ided to traffic and .access control pe!sonnel (C~iterion 3 .d. l ). Perfoqnance Measure: OROs must identify the capability to select,. estabfo,h, ~nd staff I appropriate traffic and access control' points consistent with current conditions and PAD~.( e,g:, evacuating, sheltering, and relocation) in a timely manner. This includes the capability to provide . I instructions to traffic and access control staff on actions to take when modifications in protective** action strategies necessitate changes in evacuation patterns or in the area(s) where access is controlled. I Note: Agr,ee .* . / ' I Critical Task: Impediments to evacuation are identified and.resoLved-(CriteriQn 3.d.2.), Performance M~asure: OROs must be capable to recall the appropriate actions concern,ing impediments t~ .evacuations. The discussion shoµld include decision-mal.dng and coordina~ion, I re-routing of traffic, information to boaters on and off the water and other ii;nportant information as determined. * **

• Note:

I Waterway Warning Discussion Location: Duke Energy . I 1623 Village Road NE Leland, NC 28451 Date: July 11, 2018 I Time: 1:30 pm Agree

                                    . Core Capability: Mass Care I NOTE: This core capability will be validated as courtesy evaluation during a scheduled *

• discussion. ' *'
• I Critical Task: Equipment, maps, displays, monitoring instruments, dosimetry, KI, medical services, and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations (Criterion l .e. l ).

I I

Radiological Emergen~y Preparedness Program I After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant I Performance Measure: Equipment and supplies for non-facility-based operations must be,. sufficient, consistent and used according to plans, procedures and/or directions for public life sustatning and lifesaving operations. I

Participants:

Brunswick County. Note: This will be a Courtesy Evaluation I Agree Critical Task: OROs issue appropriate dosimetry, KI, and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to EWs in accordance with the plans/procedures. (Criterion 3 .a. I). , *.

• I Performance Measure: OROs must identify the capability to provide emergency workers (including supplemental resources) with the appropriate direct-reading and permanent-record,.

I dosimetry, dosimeter chargers, KI, and instructions on the use of these items. ,.. , **

• EWs should recall the procedure relating to reading and recording findings on the appropriate.,, :*

exposure record or chart. OROs maintain appropriate record-keeping of the administration o.H<J:: I to EWs.

Participants:

Brunswick County I Note: Agree I Critical Task: Kl and appropriate instructions are available if a decision to recommend use of Kl is made. Appropriate record-keeping of the administration of KI for institutionalized individuals and the general public is maintained (Criterion 3.b.1). I Performance Measure: OROs must demonstrate the capability to make Kl available to institutionalized individuals and, where provided for in their plans/procedures, to members of the I general public. OROs must demonstrate the capability to accomplish distribution of KI consistent with decisions I made. OROs must have the capability to develop and maintain lists of institutionalized individuals who have ingested KI, including documentation of the date(s) and time(s) they were instructed to I ingest Kl.

Participants:

Brunswick County I Note: This will be a Courtesy Evaluation Agree I Critical Task: Managers of congregate care/reception facilities demonstrate that centers have resources to provide services and accommodations consistent with planning guidelines. Manager demonstrate the procedures to assure that evacuees have been monitored for contamination and I have been decontaminated as appropriate before entering congregate care facilities/reception center (Criterion 6.c.l). I 46 I I

I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program After Action Report 2018 Brunswick Nuclear Plant Performance Measures: OROs must demonstrate the capability fo make decisions on the need for decontaniihation of the c*ommunity individuals, follow appropriate decontamination *

• procedures, provide medical assistance (when required), and maintain records of all community individuals and pets, according to appropriate plans, procedures, protocols, regulations and* arty I other authorities for the jurisdiction.

Participants:

Bmnswick County I NOTE: 'f;his wiU be a Courtesy Evaluation Reception Center North Bmnswick High School I 114 Scorpion Drive . . Lelanc(NC :- J. Date: 10 July 2018 I Time:'4:00 pm Agree, I I I I ':;' I ._/. I I I I I I 47:* I}}