ML18153C766

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-280/91-28 & 50-281/91-28 on 910827-30. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Program for Transportation of Radioactive Matl to Review Activities Associated w/910827 Transportation Accident
ML18153C766
Person / Time
Site: Surry  
Issue date: 09/16/1991
From: Decker T, Wright F
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18153C764 List:
References
50-280-91-28, 50-281-91-28, NUDOCS 9110080236
Download: ML18153C766 (7)


See also: IR 05000280/1991028

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323

IEP23 t99J

Report Nos.:

50-280/91-28 and 50-281/91-28

Licensee:

Virginia Electric and Power Company

Glen Allen, VA 23060

Docket Nos.:

50-280 and 50-281

License Nos.:

DPR-32 and DPR-37

Facility Name:

Surry 1 and 2

Inspection Conducted:

August 27-30, 1991

Inspector:

~

YL L) a,, 1 /t

F. N.

right

Oat~ Signed

Approval

Scope:

By: ~-RdtaL

9/;~h/

T. R. Decker

Date Signed

Radiological Effluents and Chemistry Section

Radiological Protection and Emergency

Prepardness Branch

Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards

SUMMARY

This special inspection of the licensee's program for

transportation of radioactive material was made to review the

activities associated with a shipment of radioactive material

involved in a transportation accident on August 27, 1991, in

Norfolk, Virginia.

Results:

One violation was identified for failure to properly identify the

physical form of the radioactive material involved in a

transportation accident. The inspector determined that the

licensee did not have a program that would require persons

knowledgeable of the physical characteristics of complex

components or articles to assess and specify the physical form of

radioactive material presented to the radioactive material

transportation staff for shipment.

9110080236 910923

PDR

ADOCK 05000280

Q

PDR

1.

Persons Contacted

Licensee Employees

REPORT DETAILS

  • M. Bechman, Radioactive Material Control
  • W. Benthall, Supervisor, Licensing
  • M. Biron, Supervisor Radiological Engineering
  • H. Blake, Superintendent, NSS
  • W. Cook, Supervisor, Health Physics Operations
  • D. Erickson, Superintendent, Radiation Protection
  • B. Garber, Supervisor, Health Physics
  • B. Guritney, Superintendent, Maintenance
  • M. Haddock, Supervisor, Maintenance
  • D. Hart, Supervisor, Quality Assurance
  • M. Kansler, Station Manager
  • M. Olin, Supervisor, Decontamination Services
  • J. Price, Assistant Station Manager
  • E. Smith, Manager, Quality Assurance
  • W. Thorton, Director Health Physics and Chemistry

Services

Other licensee personnel contacted during this inspection

included engineers, mechanics, technicians, and

administrative personnel.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • M. Branch, Senior Resident Inspector
  • Attended Exit Interview

2.

Transportation Accident Overview

On the morning of August 27, 1991, a contaminated Reactor

Coolant Pump Motor (RCPM) and package, being transported on

a flatbed trailer from the Surry Power Station to a

Westinghouse facility, struck the Jefferson Avenue overpass

as the transport vehicle was attempting to enter onto

westbound Interstate 64 (I-64) in Newport News, Virginia.

The height of the package on the trailer was greater than

the clearance of the overpass it entered, causing the

package to come in contact with the overpass and fall from

the trailer onto the road.

The RCPM had been contaminated with low level radioactive

material during its use at the plant and was being

transported as Low Specific Activity (LSA) radioactive

material. The RCPM was contained in a strong tight container

(package) for the transport. The RCPM package was severely

damaged and the RCPM was resting on its side in the road,

outside it's package. A small amount of radioactive fluids

2

spilled from the RCPM onto the road surface. The fluid

migrated down into the damaged road surface and out to the

outside (right) road shoulder. At the shoulder the concrete

road surface joined with an asphalt berm. The contaminated

fluid reached that joint and traveled along it for a couple

of hundred feet, seeping into the fissure as it advanced.

Since the load was oversized and required a permit, the

transport vehicle was being escorted by other transport

company personnel in vehicles to it's front and rear when

the accident occurred at about 09:38 a.m. Both lanes of the

east and west roads were blocked for about 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />. The east

bound lanes were opened about 1:00 p.m. and one lane going

west on I-64 was opened for traffic later that afternoon.

Two cranes were moved to the accident site and the motor was

lifted from the road and moved onto another trailer for

transport back to the Surry site. Since the transport

package for the RCPM was destroyed in the accident, the

licensee proposed the use of two impermeable Herculon

"socks" as strong tight containers for transporting the RCPM

back to Surry site. The licensee contacted the Department of

Transportation (DOT) about the proposed repackaging plan and

was advised that the proposal appeared to be acceptable for

meeting the requirements of 49 CFR 173.425(b). on August 28,

1991, the licensee departed the accident scene with the RCPM

about 2 a.m. and arrived at the Surry site approximately

4 a.m.

VEPCO volunteered to perform the decontamination of the road

and sent considerable equipment as well as numerous

personnel to the site to begin the task. Recovery workers

included representatives from decontamination, health

physics, maintenance, and other Surry staffs. The licensee's

personnel began decontamination activities the afternoon of

the accident and worked around the clock for about 2 1/2

days until the task was completed in the early hours of

August 30, 1991. The Commonwealth of Virginia, Bureau of

Radiological Health radiological control personnel released

the area as clean (background radiation levels) before

sunrise that day. The Commonwealth highway department began

repair of the road at sunrise and was able to open all

westbound lanes of I-64 later that day. The licensee

dispatched sufficient resources and personnel to perform the

task effectively and safely.

3

3.

Inspection Findings

a.

Requirements

10 CFR 71.5(a) requires a licensee, who transports any

licensed material outside the confines of his plant or

other place of use, or delivers any licensed material

for transport, except where such transport is subject

to the regulations of the U.S. Postal Service, to

comply with the applicable requirements of the DOT

regulations presented in 49 CFR Parts 170 through 189

insofar as such regulations relate to the packaging of

byproduct, source, or special nuclear material, marking

and labeling of the packages, loading and storage of

packages, placarding of the transportation vehicle,

monitoring requirements, accident reporting, and

shipping papers.

49 CFR 173.425 specifies the transport requirements for

LSA radioactive materials. Paragraph (b) of 173.425

specifies the requirements for shipments consigned as

exclusive use and Paragraph (b) (1) requires the

materials be packaged in strong tight packages so that

there will be no leakage of radioactive material under

conditions normally incident to transportation.

49 CFR 172.200 specifies the requirements for shipping

papers. Paragraph 172.203(d) (ii) requires that the

shipment of radioactive material must include a

description of the physical and chemical form of the

material.

VEPCO Operational Quality Assurance Program Topical

Report -

VEP 1-5A describes the licensee's commitments

to various Regulatory Guides including Regulatory

Guide 1.33, Quality Assurance Requirements (Operation),

Revision 2, February 1978.

Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, 1978, requires

written procedures for control of radioactivity (for

limiting materials released to the environment and

limiting personnel exposure).

b.

RCPM Description

The RCPM had four major coolers, two air and two oil.

All of the coolers used site component cooling water

(CCW) as a cooling media. The largest cooling system is

the upper bearing oil cooler which cools approximately

175 gallons of oil with a heat exchanger holding

approximately 10 gallons of ccw. The remaining coolers

hold less than 2 gallons of CCW each.

4

c.

RCPM Replacement

The inspector determined that when the CCW lines were

disconnected from the RCPM in the Reactor Building

containment and at that time those lines and the fluid

from the RCPM where these lines are connected were

allowed to drain by gravity.

However, those ccw system

connecting points on the RCPM were not necessarily low

points in it's cooling systems. Therefore, simply

disconnecting the CCW lines to the RCPM could not drain

its cooling system inventory alone.

Additionally, the

licensee did not block the influent or effluent ccw

ports on the RCPM before shipment. Therefore, in

positions other than a normal upright position,

remaining CCW fluids could flow by gravity out of the

coolers. The motor was disconnected from the pump in

April of 1991 and moved to the crane building. The RCPM

remained there until it was loaded onto the flat bed

trailer for shipment.

d.

ccw

The licensee had experienced recent problems with their

CCW system in that it had become significantly

contaminated with reactor coolant system leakage. The

inspector learned that the radioactivity of the ccw

system in April 1991, was on the order of

1 E-03 microcuries per milliliter (µCi/ml). A small

sample of the radioactive liquid collected at the

accident scene was analyzed and indicated approximately

1 E-3 µCi/ml of Cs-137. This analysis agreed closely to

the radioactivity measured in the CCW system at the

time the RCPM was disconnected from the system,

indicating that the spilled water's source was CCW from

the upper bearing oil cooler heat exchanger.

e.

Package

f.

The inspector determined that the licensee had utilized

a steel container that fully enclosed the RCPM and that

included gaskets at package joints to prevent any

release of radioactivity under conditions normally

incident to transport. The steel package built for

transporting the RCPM met the requirements of a strong

tight package as required by the regulations.

Shipping Papers and Physical Assessment

The licensee identified the physical and chemical form

of radioactivity on the RCPM shipping papers as

solid/oxides. However, when_the RCPM turned over onto

5

I-64 a small amount of liquid, estimated to be from 5

to 10 gallons, drained from the motor to contaminate

the roadway indicating that the physical form of the

radioactive material was both a liquid and solid.

The radiation protection group responsible for

preparing radioactive material for transport was

unaware that liquids could be internal to the RCPM. The

transportation staff used a written procedure to

estimate the radioactivity of the RCPM from a

combination of radioactive contamination swipes taken

from external surfaces and direct radiation

measurements. However, the transportation staff did not

have a procedure for preparing the RCPM for shipment

nor easy access to the RCPM internals. In interviews

with licensee personnel the inspector determined that

various members of the health physics staff were not

aware of the potential for a RCPM to contain water and

oil when presented for shipment and therefore did not

request information concerning fluids from

knowledgeable sources prior to shipping. As a result,

the transportation staff was not aware that the RCPM

was a mixture of solid and liquid/oxide form at the

time of shipment.

The inspector determined that the licensee did not have

a system that would require persons knowledgable of the

technical details and conditions of articles presented

to the transportation group to assess and determine the

physical and chemical form of the radioactive material.

Failure to have appropriate controls and procedures to

properly determine the physical form of radioactive

material in accordance with the requirements of DOT

regulations was identified as a violation of the

licensee's commitments for having written procedures as

specified in the licensee's Topical Report

(50-280/91-28-0l).

g.

Shipper Qualifications

The inspector reviewed the qualifications of the person

authorizing the transport of the RCPM involved in the

accident and determined that the individual worker was

an ANSI qualified health physics technician that had

completed the licensee's transportation qualification

program and was qualified to authorize the shipment of

radioactive materials.

One violation was identified.

.,

4.

6

Exit Meeting

The inspection scope and results were summarized on

August 30, 1991, with those persons indicated in

Paragraph 1. The inspector described the areas inspected and

discussed in detail the inspection results as listed below.

Proprietary information is not contained in this report.

Item Number

50-280/91-28-01

Description and Reference

VIO - Failure to develop and

implement procedures and controls

to properly assess the physical

form of radioactive material

offered for transportation

(Paragraph 3.f).