ML18153B915
| ML18153B915 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 09/28/1989 |
| From: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18152A101 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-280-89-24, 50-281-89-24, NUDOCS 8910100060 | |
| Download: ML18153B915 (2) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted betwee*n the p~riod of July 30 to September 2, 1989, violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the 11General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Act ions,II 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violations are listed below:
A.
Technical Specification 3.0.1 requires, in part, that if a requirement cannot be satisfied, the unit shall be placed in at least hot shutdown within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> unless corrective measures are completed that permit operation.under the permissible action statement.
Contrary to the above, Technical Specificati_on 3.0.1 requirements were.
- not complied with in that, upon discovery of a missed surveillance in Technical Specification 4.1.A,2, Unit l entered Technical Specification 3.0.1 at 1320 hours0.0153 days <br />0.367 hours <br />0.00218 weeks <br />5.0226e-4 months <br /> on August 15, 1989, and was not placed in hot shutdown nor were the corrective actions completed that would permit operation until 1620 hours0.0188 days <br />0.45 hours <br />0.00268 weeks <br />6.1641e-4 months <br /> on August 16, 1989.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) and applies to Unit 1 only.
B_.
Technical Specification 6. 4 requires, in part, that procedures for the testing of components and systems involv1ng nuclear safety of the station shall be followed.-
Contrary to the above, a procedure for testing of. components was not followed, in that, on.August 1, 1989, during performance of periodic testing of the Unit 1 turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump, operators made adjustments to the turbine speed which were not in accordance with the procedure in effect, l-PT-15. lC, Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump (l~FW-P-2), dated July 25, 1989.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) and applies to Unit 1 only.
C.
Technical Specification 4.6.t. requires the station batteries to be tested.
within specific intervals. Technical Specification 4.0.2 further allows a plus or minus 25 percent adjustment of the test interval to accommodate normal test schedules.
- 9 :I. 0 :l 00060 ::::*?0')2::::
PDR ADOCK 05000280 Q
Virgini.a Electric and Power Company Surry Units 1 and 2 2
Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 Contrary to the above, station battery testing was not accomplished, in that,. from August 19~8 through August 1989, 11 battery survei 11 ance tests were not performed within the required interval.
This is a Severity Level IV violation* (Supplement I) and applies to both units.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Electric and Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC
- 20555, with a copy to the Regi anal Administrator, Region II, _ and a.copy to the NRC
- Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a 11 Reply to a Notice-of
~Violation 11 and should include [for each violation]:
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps whith will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
If an adequate reply is not received wjthin the time specified in this Notice, an.order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this~ day of~.;t989 FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION A lJ t % __
0
'1tewart D. Ebneter
~ Regional _Admiriistrator