ML18152A224

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of Mgt Meeting on 890228 at Plant.List of Attendees & Handout Also Encl
ML18152A224
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 04/13/1989
From: Ebneter S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Cartwright W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
References
NUDOCS 8904240267
Download: ML18152A224 (49)
v • d • e


Text

Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281 License Nos. OPR-32, DPR-37 APR 1 3 1989 Virginia Electric and Power Company ATTN:

Mr. \\~. R. Cartwright, Vice President, Nuclear Operations 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MANAGEMENT MEETING

SUMMARY

This letter refers to the Management Meeting held on February 28, 1989, at the Surry Pov:e:r Station.

The meeting concerned activities authorized for your Surry facility, and involved discussions of your corrective actions to various plant problems.

A list of attendees, a meeting summary, and a copy of your handout are enclosed.

In accordance 11ith 2.790 of the NRC 1s 11 Rules of Practice 11

, Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concering this matter, please contact us.

. Sincerely,

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees
2.

Meeting Summary

3.

Handout cc w/encls:

M. R. Kansler, Station Manager Original signed by Stewart D. Ebneter Regional Administrator R. F. Saunders, Manager - Nuclear Programs and Licensing Commonwealth of Virginia bee w/encls:

NRC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk R<<II.

0 \\' /-.,:,1,

~ *:,'

MLewi s: tj 03/~ '/89 RII 5-45' SShaeffer 03//i /89 8904240267 890413 PDR ADOCK 05000280 PDC RII l'hfX PFreb;.X:kson 041( /89

~

-~i~

04/S /89

ENCLOSURE I MANAGEMENT MEETING LIST OF ATTENDEES Virginia Electric and Power Company J. Ferguson, President, CEO W. Stewart, Senioi Vice President - Nuclear J. Rhodes, Senior Vice President W. Cartwright, Vice President - Nuclear Operations F. Moore, Vice President - Power Engineering Services M. Kansler, Station Manager - Surry D. _Christian, Assistant Station Manager - Surry J. Grecheck, Assistant Station Manager - Surry R. Saunders, Manager - Licensing R. Calder, Manager - Nuclear Engineering Nuclear Regulatory Commission J. Taylor, Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Regional Operations and Researth, Office of the Executive Director for Operations (EDO)

M. Ernst, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)

J. Sniezek, Deputy Director, Office* of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

G. Lainas, Assistant Director for RII Reactors, NRR L. Reyes, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII A. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII H. Berkow, Director, Project Directorate II-2, NRR R. Borchardt, Regional Coordinator, EDO W. Troskoski, Enforcement Coordinator, Office of Enforcement B. Wilson, Branch Chief, DRP, RII J. Rosenthal, Branch Chief, Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD)

B. Buckley, Project Manager, NRR W. Holland, Senior Resident Inspector, DRP, RII J. York, Resident Inspector, DRP, RII L. Nicholson, Resident Inspector, DRP, RII M. Lewis, Project Engineer, DRP, RII E. Brown, Mechanical Engineer, AEOD

I,...

ENCLOSURE 2 MANAGEMENT MEETING

SUMMARY

An NRC and Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO) Management meeting was held at the Surry Power Station on February 28, 1989, to discuss the status of the l icensee 1 s corrective actions to various plant problems.

VEPC0 1 s Vice President - Nuclear opened the meeting by focusing on the recent enhancements at Surry, and stating that the commitment to a quality job and safety has become evident to VEPCO management during tours of the plant.

The Station Ma~ager - Surry discussed several management actions to enhance performance, including the consolidation of engineering functions, institution

... of the Configuration Management Project (CMP), and assurance of thorough reviews of operational events.

With respect to engineering consolidation, VEPCO stated that there are 84 engineering positions on-site, with 20 vacancies being filled with contractors.

The Station Manager then provided an update on the Operational Readiness Assurance Program, including the emergency power system testing.

Thirty-five systems were identified for walkdown in the program.

The Surry Unit 1 walkdowns have been completed and the Unit 2 walkdowns have started.

VEPCO stated that they have not found significant safety deficiencies during the walkdowns, and that 60 of the 1543 11 items of note 11 from the Unit 1 walkdowns have been categorized as startup items.

With respect to emergency power system testing, the Station Manager stated that the emergency *diesel generator testing is complete and concluded that the diesels would have performed their intended functions.

The dead bus test verified that loads a~e powered from the correct bus, with fourteen discrepancies noted.

VEPCO stated that the most significant discrepancy was the spiking of the B train inadequate core cooling monitor when A train was deenergized.

The Station Manager discussed the status of other issues, including restart Hems.

The restart issues discussed included canal inventory, service water heat exchanger performance, control room and emergency switchgear room ventilation, inside recirculation spray pump operability, gas binding of the charging pumps, emergency diesel generator load sequencing, secondary pipe thinning, and socket weld e~amination.

The status of these items is contained in Enclosure 3 to this summary.

The discussion on other issues focused on non-original equipment manufactured (non-OEM) parts, safety-related motor operated valve (MOV) inspections, safety-related motors and breakers, and control room habitability.

The Station Manager stated that one low-head safety injection (SI) pump has non-OEM parts, and a spent fuel pool cooling pump and component cooling water pump had potential non-OEM parts.

The SI pump will be overhauled, and the other pumps have been evaluated as acceptable for operation.

To prevent recurrence, VEPCO stated that procurement engineering on-site verifies that requests for parts

Enc~osure 2 2

are written correctly.

In the area of safety-related MOVs, a VEPCO task team is inspecting and evaluating 141 rising stem MOVs and 60 quarter turn MOVs to ensure they are capable of performing their intended functions.

To prevent recurrence of MOV problems, VEPCO has upgr_aded their valve overhaul procedures, increased* oversight during overha!,11, and enhanced training.

The Vice President - Power Engineering Services discussed the Configuration Management Project* and its associated schedule for implementation.

The licensee expressed interest in further discussing priority, schedule, and correction of problems identified with the NRC.

NRC senior management thanked VEPCO for the presentation and stated that the information provided a good perspective on the large amount of work to be accomplished prior to and after restart.

Based on this extensive effort, NRC

... management stated that all the restart issues and subsequent post-restart programmatic efforts should be approached in a diligent manner, and that meeting schedule milestones should not compromise thorough resolution of each issue.

In closing, VEPCO reiterated their commitment to quality and safety.

\\..-'

ENCLOSURE 3 HANDOUT

VIRGINIA POWER NRC /VIRGINIA POWER INFORMATION MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1989

W. R. CARTWRIGHT VICE-PRESIDENT - NUCLEAR OPERATIONS

AGENDA I'. INTRODUCTION II. MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Ill. OPERATIONAL READINESS ASSURANCE PROGRAM IV. RESTART ISSUE STATUS V. OTHER ISSUES VI. CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT VII. CONCLUDING REMARKS

M.R.KANSLER STATION MANAGER-SURRY

r.

i MANAGEMENT ACTIONS

  • HIGHER STANDARDS
  • ENHANCED SENSITIVITY TO OPERATIONAL AND DESIGN ISSUES
  • THOROUGH REVIEW OF OPERATIONAL EVENTS
  • ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS CONSOLIDATED
  • CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
  • !MPROVEMENTS BEING ACHIEVED -. CONTINUATION OF PROCESS

OPERATIONAL READINESS ASSURANCE PROGRAM

  • OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS
  • EMERGENCY POWER TESTING
  • FUNCTIONAL TESTING
  • PROGRAM DOCUMENTED IN EWR 88-584

OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS OBJECTIVE PROVIDE ASSURANCE THAT STATION EQUIPMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY IS FULL V OPERATIONAL REVIEWS INCLUDE

  • VERIFICATION OF SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
  • HISTORIC DOCUMENT REVIEW
  • ACTIVE DOCUMENT REVIEW I'

OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS (continued)

MAJOR PHASES OF THE PROGRAM

  • SYSTEM WALKDOWN AND INSPECTION
  • DOCUMENT REVIEW
  • SIGNIFICANT ITEM IDENTIFICATION (RESTART ITEMS)
  • RESTART ITEM DISPOSITION
  • EVALUATION CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE
  • MODIFICATION
  • DISPOSITION DOCUMENT
  • VERIFY

OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEWS

{continued).

SYSTEM WALKDOWN OVERVIEW

  • SYSTEM SELECTION BY MULTIDISCIPLINE TEAM
  • EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE BASED
  • THIRTY-FIVE (35) SYSTEMS
  • TRAINING FOR SYSTEM ENGINEERS
  • UNIT ONE WALKDOWNS COMPLETED

- NO SIGNIFICANT SAFETY DEFICIENCIES

4000 3181 en 3000

e w t::
u.

0 a:

w m

e
, z 2000 1000 0

U 1 Walkdowns OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEW INSPECTION & REVIEW STATUS Cmmit Reviews Closed Type 1 s a Total Items

  • f;I Items Reviewed fill Start-up Items Act Type1,2,3

. I

'i f

i :

Temp Mods

~ I EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM TESTING

  • DEAD BUS TEST
  • INTEGRATED LOGIC/ FUNCTIONAL TESTING
  • SR VALVE POWER SUPPL V TESTING
  • EMERGENCY DIESEL ~ENERATOR TESTING (COMPLETE)

. I

DEAD BUS TEST (ST-241) 1-H DEAD BUS TEST ( ST-241)

  • VERIFIED LOADS POWERED FROM CORRECT BUS
  • FOURTEEN (14) DISCREPANCIES N9T_ED
  • ONE SIGNIFICANT TEST DISCREPANCY:

EVALUATE 'B' TRAIN ICCM SPIKING WHEN 'A' TRAIN DEENERGIZED

L --

GI

.D E

J z Drawing Change 1H DEAD BUS TEST DISCREPANCIES En~. Evalu11lon Testing POS1ponld Housekeeping Mllnt. Operating I

Procedure Change

  • lle1Ht Required Data current as of 2/22/89

INTEGRATED LOGIC/FUNCTIONAL TESTING COINCIDENT CLS/LOOP (PUMP BREAKERS IN TEST)

CLS WITH LOOP AFTER 2.5 MINUTE DELAY (BREAKERS IN TEST)

CLS WITH LOOP AFTER FIVE (5) MINUTES PUMPS ON RECIRCULATION (IH, 2H, 2J)

PUMPS ON RECIRCULATION WITH LOAD BANK (1J) i !

/

' I l

f,

(

i <.

i. /'

(. r f

f

SAFETY RELATED VALVE POWER SUPPLY TESTING STATUS

  • UNIT 1 VALVE SPECIAL TEST PREPARED (ST-244)*

INCLUDES VITAL BUS, DC BUS, AND H&J MCCs

  • TESTING IN PROGRESS (H TRAIN ONL V) 107 OF 193 COMPLETE

ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONAL TESTING

  • IDENTIFIED BY OPERATIONAL READINESS REVIEW AUXILIARY FEEDWATER HEADER TEST RECIRCULATION MODE TRANSFER TEST CHARGING PUMP LOW HEAD TO HIGH HEAD TEST

RESTART ISSUE STATUS

  • CANAL INVENTORY SUBMIT TECH SPEC CHANGE AND

SUMMARY

REPORT CCHX FLOW INSTRUMENTATION AND CANAL RELATED MODIFICATIONS COMPLETE ESW PUMP SPECIAL TESTING 48 HOUR TEST RETEST 'A' PUMP FLOW

'B' PUMP FLOW TEST

'C' PUMP FLOW TEST 3-17-89 3-29-89 COMPLETE 3-15-89 COMPLETE

  • 3-6-89

~

RESTART ISSUE STATUS (continued)

  • SW HEAT EXCHANGER PERFORMANCE MCR CHILLER CONDENSER SPECIAL TEST CCHX FLOW* PERFORMANCE TESTING
  • CONTROL ROOM & EMERGENCY SWITCHGEAR HVAC SUBMIT TECH SPEC CHANGE MODIFICATIONS COMPLETE 3-18-89 3-29-89 3-17-89 3-17-89

RESTART ISSUE STATUS

{continued}

  • INSIDE RECIRCULATION SPRAY PUMPS
  • CABLEREPLACEMENT FLOW TESTING UNIT1 UNIT2 SUBMIT TECH SPEC CHANGE
  • GAS BINDING OF CHARGING PUMPS UNIT 1 & 2 MODIFICATIONS CABLE PULLED 3-13-89 3-22-89 3-10-89 COMPLETE

RESTART ISSUE STATUS (continued)

  • EDG LOAD SEQUENCING MODIFICATIONS FINAL

SUMMARY

REPORT

  • SECONDARY PIPE THINNING
  • SOCKET WELD EXAMINATION COMPLETE 03/10/89 COMPLETE COMPLETE.

I

OTHER ISSUES

  • NON-OEM PARTS
  • SAFETY RELATED MOV INSPECTIONS
  • SAFETY RELATED MOTORS & BREAKERS

- IRSP/ORSP MOTORS

- SAFETY RELATED MOTOR TERMINATIONS

  • 4160 VOLT BREAKERS

-~

\\

    • ': :.~/

f,

J

OTHER ISSUES NON-OEM PARTS EWR ISSUED COVERING:

  • FOUR (4) VALVES
  • SIXTY-ONE (61) PUMPS RESULTS:
  • 1-SI-P-1A

- HAS NON-OEM PARTS

  • 1-FC-P-1 B - POTENTIAL NON-OEM PARTS
  • 1-CC-P-1 B - POTENTIAL NON-OEM PARTS ACTIONS:
  • REPLACE PARTS IN 1-SI-P-1A PRIOR
  • 1-FC-P-18 & 1-CC-P-18 EVALUATED ACCEPTABLE FOR OPERATION

OTHER ISSUES SAFETY RELATED MOV PROGRAM

  • TASK TEAM WORKING TO ENSURE SR MOVs WHICH CHANGE STATE FOR SAFE SHUTDOWN ARE CAPABLE OF PERFORMING THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION
  • AR*EAS BEING EXAMINED

":. TRAINING

..

  • DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

.,. WORKMANSHIP DURING REFURBISHMENT AND MODIFICATION

- MOVATS TESTING OVERSIGHT

- TEST RESULTS REVIEW

- IMPLEMENTATION OF INDUSTRY RECOMMENDATIONS

  • SCOPE INSPECT VALVES, EVALUATE DEVIATIONS AND VERIFY PROPER DESIGN INFO, MAINTENANCE AND TESTING FOR:

- 141 RISING STEM MOVs 60 QUARTER TURN MOVs

!' )I

OTHER ISSUES SAFETY RELATED MOV PROGRAM: TASK TEAM

  • REVIEW CONTROL SWITCH SETTING CALCULATIONS FOR DYNAMIC EFFECTS
  • VERIFY THRUST REQUIREMENTS AND ADDRESS OPERATOR SIZING CONCERNS
  • COMPLETE TWO-TRAIN TO FOUR-TRAIN CONVERSION
  • PERFORM CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE
  • REPEAT MOVATS TESTING AS REQUIRED

OTHER ISSUES SAFETY RELATED MOV PROGRAM PRIOR TO START-UP

  • COMPLETE EVALUATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
  • DOCUMENT PROGRAM LONG TERM ACTIONS
  • APPLY PROGRAM TO BALANCE OF SAFETY RELATED MOVs

OTHER ISSUES

  • sAFETY RELATED MOTORS & BREAKERS,

IRSP MOTOR ISSUES SILICON FEED~R CABLE CONCERNS (1-RS-P-1 B)

SHORT MOTOR LEADS LUGGING WORKMANSHIP ORSP MOTOR ISSUES OVERHEATING CONCERNS {1-RS-P-28)

MOTOR LEAD EXTENSION SIZING CUTS UNDER RAYCHEM ISSUES EVALUATED AND CORRECTED FOR STARTUP*

OTHER ISSUES IRSP/ORSP MOTORS BASED ON EVALUATIONS TO DATE, THE AS-FOUND OPERABILITY OF THE.

RECIRCULATION SPRAY PUMPS IS AS FOLLOWS:

MARK NUMBER UNIT 1 1-RS-P-1A 1-RS-P-1B

t-,

OTHER ISSUES SAFETY RELATED MOTOR TERMINATIONS

  • EXAMINE TERMINATIONS ON FIFTEEN (15) SAFETY RELATED MOTORS
  • LUGGING PROCEDURES TO BE UPGRADED
  • INSPECT AND REPAIR TERMINATIONS AS INDICATED r,*

!,,

  • EVAL~il~;AND D0CU~~t,f[iN,S!>%'~CTION FINDINGS
tl /.

J.,,,,.

'~';)

y_,'

}~;',;" 1:f *.,){,;

)

/

I I

I

~*\\

.-ur:

! :::ft;:! i : f 'i;f

/

OTHER ISSUES 4160 VOLT BREAKERS (ITE MODEL SHK-350)

  • BREAKER FAILED TO CLOSE DUE TO ACCUMULATION OF DUST, DIRT, AND GREASE IN CLOSING MECHANISM ON BREAKER UNDERCARRIAGE I) CLEANING ALL SR 4160 BREAKERS BEFORE STARTUP
  • ADD TO PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
  • NETWORK ENTRIES

F. K. MOORE VICE-PRESIDENT - POWER ENGINEERING SERVICES

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT DEFINITION MANAGEMENTPROCESSTHATCONTROLSCHANGES TO ENSURE

  • PLANT STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONFORM TO THE APPROVED DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, ESPECIALLY AFTER CHANGES
  • PLANT'S PHYSICAL AND FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS ARE ACCURATEL V REFLECTED IN THE PLANT DOCUMENTS (E.G., DESIGN, PROCUREMENT, OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE AND TRAINING)

THE ESSENCE OF CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT IS TO CONTROL THE CRITICAL FEATURES OF A PLANT'S SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, OR STRUCTURES WHICH, IF CHANGED, COULD RESULT IN DEGRADED OPERABILITY OR SAFETY IMPLICATIONS

OTHER ISSUES CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY

  • REVIEW NORTH ANNA POWER STATION ISSUES
  • COMPLETE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO START-UP

OTHER ISSUES CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY

  • REVIEW NORTH ANNA POWER STATION ISSUES
  • COMPLETE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO START-UP

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT LINKAGES PHYSICAL CONFIGURATION DESIGN BASIS

[ PROCESSES DOCUMENTS

]

i I

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION CONFIQURATION MANAOENDfT TEAM LEADER I ADMINISTRATIVE I I

SUPPORT I

I I

I I

I PUNT U:E IIUIIIIY NOIITH ANNA COOIIIIINATOII COOIIDINATOII COOIIDINATOII COOIIDINATOII EXTENSON

~ALIIODE.

PHYSICAL MODEL -

PIIOCESSES SYSTEM DESION COOIIDINATOII COOIIDINATOII COOIIDINATOII INTEOIIATION

    • sis DOCtJMBITS

~

I

)

ITAFF I STAFF I ~

I COWIITEII I H ELECTIIICAL 1

-DOCt.UENr (CONTIIACT)

(CONTIIACT)

OPEIIATION MOO£UNQ CONTIIOL AND I & C

~

I

~ AD=~ONJ H

I 1 STAFF J

MAINTENANCE MECHANICAL (VP)

H ENmNEEII.. Q I STAFF I ~

CIVIL I I

(CONTIIACT)

~

HP & CHEIIISTIIY NUCLEAII H

I LICENSING I

SYSTEM I ENOINEERINO ADMINISTIIATION I

~

STAFF I

(CbNTIIACT)

~

OTHER FUNCTIONS

.i J;

DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION OBJECTIVE CREATE A STAND ALONE CONCISE BASIS DOCUMENT WITH AN INDEX TO DETAILED DESIGN DOCUMENTS WHICH CONTAINS:

  • PLANT DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS

- GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA

- LICENSING BASIS AND COMMITMENTS

- DESIGN BACKGROUND

- ACCIDENT ANAL VSIS ASSUMPTIONS

- DESIGN INFORMATION COMMON TO SYSTEMS

- PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES

- SYSTEM INTERFACES

~

DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION

. (continued)

  • SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTS REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS INDUSTRY GUIDES AND STANDARDS LICENSING BASIS ABBREVIATED SYSTEM DESCRIPTION SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR NORMAL AND ACCIDENT CONDITIONS SYSTEMINTERFACES SYSTEM DESIGN BACKGROUND -

DESIGN MODIFICATION HISTORY COMPONENT DESIGN INFORMATION FOR MAJOR COMPONENTS SYSTEM MARGINS SETPOINT BASIS RECONSTITUTION OF CRITICAL MISSfNG CALCULATIONS

DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION (continued)

  • IND!EX TO DETAILED DESIGN DOCUMENTS
  • DATA NOT INCLUDED IN DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION

- VERIFICATION OF CALCULATIONS DETAILED CALCULATIONS {REFERENCED)

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS {REFERENCED)

DETAILED SAFETY ANALYSIS {REFERENCED)

- SYSTEM SPECIFIC DESIGN VERIFICATION CHECKLIST PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPONENTS

CM PROJECT PROCESS REVIEW DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT INTEGRATION COMPUTER APPLICATION PHYSICAL VERIFICATION I

1988 I

DEVELOP I

~

I I

I I

I f

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT

SUMMARY

SCHEDULE - 1988--1995 TYPICAL STATION {NORTH ANNA & SURRY) 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

INTEGRATE I

.1 I

I I

I I

I I

I SETPOINT

  • VALIDATION I

I I

1994 I PILOT I UFSAR VALIDATION I I

I I

I I

I I

I I PILOT I I

I PLANT 080 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I PILOT I 6 DBD'a I s DBD'a 15 DBD'a I 13 DBD's I 13 DBD's I 13 DBD's I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I INDEX DOCSI ADDI IAoDI IADDI fADDI (ADDI I

I I

I I

I I

I INDEX O&M DOCUMENTS I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I 1995 I

I I

11 DBD's I

I (ADDI IADD I

I I

l I SPEC I INSTALL I BUILD CM MODEL,

DATABASE,

& RELATIONSHIPS I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I EQUIPMENT MASTER LIST, Q-LIST,, TAGGING, ETC.

I I

I I

I, I

I DBDI I

I oeDI I

IDeol '

I oeDI I

IDeDI I

I DBDI I

IDeol I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

COMPUTER SYSTEMS DOCUMENTS DESIGN BASIS SYSTEM ENGINEERING PHYSICAL VERIFICATION TYPICAL SYSTEM ACTIVITIES CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT MONTHS 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

BUILD COMPUTER DATABASE I l j l O&MDOCS I INDEX DESIGN DOCUM=NTS I f PREPARE SDBD I I O&MWORK

, I I l I

COMPONENT TASKS VERIFY

  • S.E. CHECKS

/

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT SYSTEM PRIORITIES AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SERVICE WATER CONTAINMENT SPRAY RECIRCULATION SPRAY INSTRUMENT AIR EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM SAFETY INJECTION I

t..

~~~---------

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT SYSTEM PRIORITIES (continued)

RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM COMPONENT COOLING CHEMICAL AND VOLUME CONTROL REMAINING SYSTEMS

~

I

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT ESTIMATED COST COST ACTIVITY (MILLION $)

DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION 26 PHYSICAL VERIFICATION 24 PROCESS REVIEWS 2

DOCUMENT INTEGRATION 3

CONFIGURATION DATA COMPILATION

_§_

ESTIMATED TOTAL PROGRAM COST

$60

W. R. CARTWRIGHT VICE-PRESIDENT*- NUCLEAR OPERATIONS

I l
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18152A224&oldid=4988106"