05000280/LER-1979-022-01, /01X-1 on 790621:increase in Steam Generator Ref Leg Temp Resulting in Rise in Containment Temp Not Accounted for by Westinghouse Accident analysis.Long-term Action Under Evaluation

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML18116A383)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/01X-1 on 790621:increase in Steam Generator Ref Leg Temp Resulting in Rise in Containment Temp Not Accounted for by Westinghouse Accident analysis.Long-term Action Under Evaluation
ML18116A383
Person / Time
Site: Surry Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 08/10/1979
From: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18116A382 List:
References
LER-79-022-01X, LER-79-22-1X, NUDOCS 7908200376
Download: ML18116A383 (3)


LER-1979-022, /01X-1 on 790621:increase in Steam Generator Ref Leg Temp Resulting in Rise in Containment Temp Not Accounted for by Westinghouse Accident analysis.Long-term Action Under Evaluation
Event date:
Report date:
2801979022R01 - NRC Website

text

NRC FORM 366 (7-7J)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT

  • CONTROL 8 LOCK:..__..__.,____..__.i..l _ _.____.I G) 6 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION)

~

I vj Al sjP I sj 1101 o I o I - I o I o I o I o I o I - I o I o 101 4 11 11 11 I 1 101 I 1 0 7

8 9

LICENSEE CODE 14

  • 15 LICENSE NUMBER 25 26 LICENSE TYPE 30 57 CAT 58 CON'T

~ ~~~~~~ LL.JG) Io I s I o I o I o I 2 I s I o 101 o I 6 I 2 I 1 I 7 I 9 101 o I s I 1 I o I 7 I 9 I G) 7 8

60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 EVENT DATE 74 75 REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES@

[}:II] I On 6/21/79 Westinghouse notified VEPCO of a non-conservatism in the accident analysis.I ITTIJ [QJIJ [QTIJ [QTIJ [ill]

Specifically, the increase in steam generator reference leg temperature resultant from a rise in containment temperature was not properly accounted for.

Consequently, safeguards actuation may be delayed after a high energy line break.

This event is reportable as per Technical Specifications 6.6.2.a.8.

7 8 9 80 [ill]

7 8

[J]J]

ITTIJ SYSTEM CODE

CAUSE

CAUSE CODE SU8CODE COMPONENT CODE COMP.

SU8CODE VALVE SUBCODE.

le I HI@ Lll@ w@

rl N I s* I T I R I u, e tu u.J@

9 10 11 12 13 18 19 20

~

LER/RO CVENT YEAR

~

REPORT I 71 9/

SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT TYPE REPORT NO.

CODE NUMBER 21 22 I I 0J2J2/

J/I I 0111 L!J

23.

24 26 27 28 ACTION FUTURE EFFECT SHUTDOWN r:;::;,.

ATTACHMENT TAKEN ACTION ON PLANT METHOD HOURS ~ SUBMITTED

~@L!J LU@) ~

I. 01 01 01 Oj. LU@

33 34 35 36 31 40 41 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS @

29 30 NPRD-4 FORM SUB.

~@

42 31 PRIME COMP.

SUPPLIER

~@

43 REVISION NO.

LLJ 32 COMPONENT MANUFACTURER 1w 11 12 1° I@

44 47 The event was caused by a deficiency in the accident analysis.

Immediate corrective I action has been completed and long term action is being evaluated.by Westinghouse andl VEPCO.

Westlnghouse has submitted a 10 CFR 21 report.

[IJlJL-~~~~~~~-'-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-i 7

8 9

80 FACILITY STATUS

% POWER OTHER STATUS CiTIJ [.U@ I O I O I O !@)I U-1 Cold S/D METHOD OF A

DISCOVERY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION (S;

~@.... I _N_S_S_S_N_o_t_i_f_i_c_a_t_i_o_n __________

---1 8

9 10 12 1'.l ACTIVITY CONTENT Q

RELEASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY

~

l.Ll.@) W@._I ___

N_A ____

7 8

9 10 11 7

44 45 46 80 NA LOCATION OF RELEASE @

44 45 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES r:;;:;.,

NUMBER r:;:;-. TYPE

DESCRIPTION

CQ2J L__Qj O I OJ~@L--NA ________________________

--1 7

8 9

11 12 13 PERSONNEL INJURIES

(,:;\\

80 NUMBER DESCRIPTION~

DTI lo lo lo l@.___NA ________________________

7 8

9 11 12 LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACILITY "43\\

TYPE

DESCRIPTION

~

~

LU@I NA 7

8 9

10 80 80 PUBLICITY

~

R ISSUED(,;,;\\DESCRIPTION~

N C USE ONLY

'° [iliJ L.Rle;~---=N=A"-----------------------' II II I I II II II I ~

7 8

9 10 68 6 9 80 "'.

NAME OF PREPARER w. I,. Stewart PHONE: 357-3184 0

a.

<!)

Attachment, Surry Power Docket No:

Report No:

Event Date:

page 1 of 2 Station, Unit 1 50-280 79-022/0lX-l 06/21/79 UPDATE REPORT Title of Report:

Non-Conservatism in Accident Analysis

1.

Description of Event

On 6/21/79, Westinghouse notified VEPCO of a non-conservatism in the analysis.

Specifically, the potential increase in the steam generator reference leg resultant from a rise in containment temperature was not properly accounted for in the analysis.

The increased reference leg water temperature will result in a decrease of the water column density which gives an apparent increase in steam generator level.

This event is reportable as per Technical Specifications 6.6.2.a.8.

2.

Probable Consequences and Status of. Redundant Systems:*

This potential level bias could result in delayed protection signals which are based on low-low steam generator water level.

Backup signals were available from the Overtemperature Delta T, pressurizer pressure, contain-ment pressure and safety injection systems.

3.

Cause

This event was caused by the identification of a deficiency in the accident analysis for High Energy Line Break.

4.

Immediate Corrective Action

Westinghouse prepared and submitted a 10 CFR 21 Review report.

Westinghouse and VEPCO are evaluating corrective action at this time.

As a result of this evaluation, it has been determined that an increase of ten percent (10%) in the low-low steam generator level trip setpoint would compensate for the temperature effect on the reference leg.

Technical Specification 2.3.A.3.b directs that the low low steam generator level trip be set at> 5% of narrow range instrument span.

The trip set-point has been increased by the recommended 10% plus 2% for instrument error on Unit 1.

Technical Specifications will not need to be changed at the present time.

Pending an alternative long term solution, 15%

will be used as the minimum allowable safety instrument setting.

Attachment, page 2 of 2 Surry Power Docket No:

Report No:

Event Date:

Station, Unit 1 50-280 79-022/0lX-O 06/21/79 Title of Report:

Non-Cbnserva tism in Accident Analysis

5.

Subsequent Corrective Action:

Several possible long term corrective actions are under evaluation.

Once these studies are completed, they will be analyzed and if one is determined viable, it will be implemented.

If changes to Technical Specifications are required, they will be made at that time.

6.

Actions Taken to Prevent Recurrence:

The proposed corrective actions will prevent recurrence.

7.

Generic Implications:

This error may be generic to Westinghouse PWR's.