ML18095A431

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Evaluation of Westinghouse Owners Group Bounding Analysis,Per Util 890531 Response to NRC Bulletin 88-011.No short-term Safety Concerns Noted W/Thermal Stratification Effects for Duration of 10 Addl Cycles.W/O Encl
ML18095A431
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 08/28/1990
From: Stone J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Miltenberger S
Public Service Enterprise Group
References
IEB-88-011, IEB-88-11, TAC-72161, TAC-72162, NUDOCS 9008310096
Download: ML18095A431 (1)


Text

~

August 28, 1990 Docket*Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 Mr. Steven E. Miltenberger Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Public Service Electric & Gas Company Post Office Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038

Dear Mr. Miltenberger:

DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC PDR/LPDR PDI-2 Reading SVarga RWessman WButler MO'Brien TChan JS tone MThadani OGC EJordan ACRS (10)

RBlough PSwetland

SUBJECT:

NRC BULLETIN NO. 88-11, "PRESSURIZER SURGE LINE THERMAL STRATIFICATION 11 EVALUATION OF WESTINGHOUSE OWNERS GROUP BOUNDING ANALYSIS, SALEM GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 (TAC NOS.

72161 AND 72162)

By letter dated May 31, 1989, Public Service Electric and Gas Co. responded to Item l.b of NRC Bulletin No. 88-11, 11Pressurizer Surge Line Thermal Stratification.

11 The letter stated that a bounding analysis performed by the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) for Salem 1 and 2 is applicable and indicated that the pressurizer surge line (PSL) may not satisfy the ASME Section III Code criteria for the life of the plant, taking into account the effects of thermal stratification. The analysis did, however, state that the integrity of the PSL was adequate to justify continued operation of the facility for several years.

The staff has completed its review of the WOG bounding analysis and concludes that there are no short-term safety concerns associated with the thermal stratification effects for a duration of 10 additional heatup/cooldown cycles of continued plant operation. A copy of the evaluation which was sent to the WOG is enclosed for your information.

The staff will assess the conformance of the PSL to applicable Codes and regulatory requirements for 40-year plant life when the WOG report regarding Item 1.d of the Bulletin is submitted.

Enclosure:

NRR Review of WOG Sincerely,

/s/

James C. Stone, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Project - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Bounding Evaluatj_on __ <=' °"-~.-..;.;~"4:::-\\)-'i.~'~L-'L __

.:l CJ IJ *:*..::; 1 (HJ'::I /-,

  • ,1 tJ () *::* *:;. *:o --- -

cc w/enclosure:

f;DF:

ADocF b51:1;:;;f~b:~:

See next page PDC Document Name:

MILTENBERGER 72~.J.62

~DI-2/PM

~PD(.:2fo JStone:ag WButler y I J.1/90 fr IJ.190