ML18033A841

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Reactive Team Insp Repts 50-259/89-18,50-260/89-18 & 50-296/89-18 on 890210-0522 & 0612-14 & Notice of Violation.Concerns Noted Re Initiating Cycle 6 Reload W/O Adequate Monitoring & Inadequate Procedures
ML18033A841
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  
Issue date: 07/13/1989
From: Wilson B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Kingsley O
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Shared Package
ML18033A842 List:
References
NUDOCS 8907260280
Download: ML18033A841 (5)


See also: IR 05000259/1989018

Text

aecELzm7Zo

DlsrR1BUZDN

-DEMo~STRETID~ "."SxrrEx

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8907260280

DOC DATE: 89/07/13

NOTARIZED: NO

FACIL:50-259 Browns-."Ferry'nuclear. Power Station, Unit 1, Tennessee

'50-260 Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2, Tennessee

50-296 Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Station, Unit 3, Tennessee

AUTH.NAME

- 'UTHOR AFFILIATION

WILSON,B.A.

Assistant Director for Inspection Programs

RECIP.NAME

- RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

KINGSLEY,O.D.

Tennessee

Valley Authority

SUBJECT:- Forwards Reactive

Team Insp Rats

50-259,260

& 296/89-18

on 890210-0522

& 0612-14

& notice of violation.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOID

COPIES RECEIVED:LTR

I

ENCLI

SIZE:

TITLE: General

(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response

NOTES:1 Copy each to: B.Wilson,D.M.Crutchfield,B.D.Liaw,S.Black

R.Pierson,

1 Copy each to: S.Black,D.M.Crutchfield,B.D.Liaw,

R.Pierson,B.Wilson,

1 Copy each to:

S. Black,D.M.Crutchfield,B.D.Liaw,

R.Pierson,B.Wilson

DOCKET

05000259

05000260

05000296

05000259

05000260

05000296

D

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD

ACRS

AEOD/DEIIB

DEDRO

NRR/DEST DIR

NRR/DOEA DIR

11'RR/DREP/RPB10

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS2

RES

MORISSEAUE D

EXTERNAL: LPDR

NSIC

NOTES

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

-1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

5

5,

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

GEARS,G

AEOD

AEOD/TPAD

NRR SHANKMAN,S

NRR/DLPQ/PEB

NRR/DREP/EPB

10

NRR/PMAS/ILRB12

0

ERMAN,J

G FIL

02

RGN2

FILE

01

NRC PDR

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

R

?

D

S

NOTE 'IO ALL "RIDG"

RECIPIENIS'LEASE

HELP US TO REDUCE HASTE!

CONI'ACT THE DOCUMEÃI'GHHKLDESK

RXN Pl-37

(EXT. 20079) K) ELD'%NATE RXHt 2QME FR% DISHGBOTICN

LISTS FOR DOCUMENIS YOU DEPT NEEDt

TOTAL NUMBER OF, COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

30

ENCL

30

D

S

. 'Docket Nos..50-259,

50-260,

50-296

License

Nos'.

DPR-33, .DPR-52,

DPR-68

Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.

Senior Vice President.,

Nuclear

Power

Tennessee

Valley Authority

6N 38A Lookout Place

"

1101 Market Street

Chattanooga,

TN

37402-2801

Dear Mr. Kingsley:

SUBJECT:

NOTIGE OF VIOLATION

(NRC INSPECTION

REPORT

NOS. 50-259/89-18,

50-260/89-18,

AND

50-296/89-18)

This refers

to the Nuclear

Regulatory

Commission

(NRC) special

reactive

team

inspection

conducted

by

D.

R. Carpenter

and others

on

February

10 -

May 22,

1989

and June

12-14,

1989.

The purpose of this inspection

was to follow up on

the issues

raised in

NRC Inspection

Report 89-04 issued

on January

30,

1989,

and

your response

to that report dated

March 1,

1989.

These

issues

were related to

your initiating the Unit 2, Cycle

6 core reloading without adequate

monitoring

of the core

neutron flux.

At the conclusion of the inspection

the findings

were discussed

on July 10,

1989, with those

members of your staff identified in

the enclosed

inspection report.

Areas

examined

during

the

inspection

are

identified in the report.

Within

these

areas,

the inspection

consisted

of selective

examinations of procedures

and representative

records,

and interviews with personnel.

The inspection

findings indicate that certain activities

appeared

to violate

NRC requirements.

The violations

and references

to pertinent requirements

are

described

in the

enclosed

inspection

report.

The elements

to

be included in

your response

to the enclosed

Notice of Violation are described

in the Notice.

As stated

in our January

30,

1989,

letter to you transmitting

Inspection

Report 89-04,

we have evaluated

these

issues

to determine if escalated

enforce-

ment action is warranted.

We have confirmed that all of the required refueling

interlocks were in place

and operable,

and

even

though

the core

neutron flux

was

not adequately

monitored

during the initial refueling activities, that

these conditions did not significantly reduce the margin of safety.

Therefore,

escalated

enforcement

action

is

not

warranted.

This conclusion

does

not

lessen

our

concern

about

resolving

the

problems

that

resulted

in

your

initiating the Cycle

6 reload without adequate

core neutron flux monitoring.

We

have

examined

these

issues

further and

have

concluded

that the procedures

that controlled

and guided the refueling" activities are of concern

to us.

It

appears

that

a

thorough

multidisciplinary technical

review

comparing

the

procedures

with one another,

your. requirements,

the technical

specifications,

and industry standards

and guidelines

may have precluded this event.

89072+02+0

c'9071 ~

PDR

ADOCK 0 000259

Q

PDC

'

'I

Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.

~

~

We

are

.concerned

" about =the=.adequacy

of your station

and

administrative

procedures

to support-an

operating

nuclear

power plant.

Inadequat'e,

unclear,

complex

and conflicting 'procedures

have contributed to

a

number of problems.

We

are

especially'oncerned

because

these

pro'cedures

have

been

. processed

through the Procedures

Upgrade

Program .which included

walkdowns

and

" Verification

prior, to

implementation.

The

adequacy

of

procedures

is

idhntified 's

an

unresolved

item in par'agraphs

5

and

8 of

the

enclosed

inspection report.

As discussed

in our exit meeting

on July 10,

1989,

we will

meet with you as

soon

as you are ready to discuss

the meas'ures

you are taking

.to

ensure

that

your

station

procedures

are

adequate

to

support

Unit

2

startup.

In-.accordance

with Section

2.790

of the

NRC's "Rules of Practice,"

Part 2,

Title 10,

Code of Federal

Regulations,

a copy of this letter and its enclosures

will be placed in the

NRC Public Document

Room.

The responses

directed

by this letter and its enclosures

are not subject to the

clearance

procedures

of the Office of Management

and Budget as required

by the

Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980,

Pub.

L. No.96-511.

Should you have

any questions

concerning this letter,

please

contact

us.

Sincerely,

Bruce A. Wilson, Assistant Director

for Inspection

Programs

TVA Projects Division

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

NRC Inspection

Report

cc w/encls:

F.

L. Moreadith,

Vice President,

Nuclear

Engineering

M. 0. Medford, Vice President

and

Nuclear Technical Director .

Chairman,

Limestone

County

Commission

Dr. Henry Myers, Science Advisor

0. J. Zeringue, Site Director

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

M. J.

Ray, Acting Director

Nuclear Safety

and Licensing

P. Carier, Site Licensing Manager

G. Campbell,

Plant Manager

TVA Representative,

Rockville Office

General

Counsel,

TVA

State of Alabama

SUE 13 Sgg

Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.

bcc w/encls:

D.'. Crutchi'ield,

NRR

B. D. Liaw,

NRR

S.

C. Black,

NRR

R.

C. Pierson,

NRR

G.

E. Gears,

NRR

D. Moran,'RR

W. S. Little, NRR/RiI

A. H. Johnson,

NRR/RII

A.

R.

Long, NRR/RII

J.

Rutberg,

OGC

NRC Resident

Inspector

NRC Document Control Desk

RII~

WL>ttle:er

0$/ ib/89

RII