ML18032A279
| ML18032A279 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/1987 |
| From: | Ensworth F, Martin M, Peoples H TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18032A274 | List: |
| References | |
| 70400, 70400-R04, 70400-R4, NUDOCS 8706040252 | |
| Download: ML18032A279 (88) | |
Text
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REPORT TYPE: Management and Personnel Subcategory REVISION NUMBER:
4 TITLE:
Overtime PAGE 1
OF 21 REASON FOR REVISION:
Incorporation of final TAS editorial comments.
PREPARED BY:
PREPARATION SXGNATURE DATE PEER:
REVIEWS SIGNATURE ATE Tygpil SIGNATURE (5 F/'
ATE CONCURRENCES SIGNATURE DATE CEG-H'm:
c ~ ~
~~>87
- SIGNATURE DATE APPROVED BY:
CSP MA GER DATE N/A MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY)
DATE
+SRP cretaxy's signature denotes SRP concurxences axe in files.
8706040252 870522 PDR
- DOCK 05000259' PDR
I a I j 1
I
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 FRONT MATTER REV:
2 PAGE i OF viii Preface This subcategory report is one of a series of reports prepared for the Employee Concerns Special Program (ECSP) of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).
The ECSP and the organization which carried out the program, the Employee Concerns Task Group (ECTG), were established by TVA's Manager of Nuclear Power to evaluate and report on those Office of Nuclear Power (ONP) employee concerns filed before February 1, 1986.
Concerns filed after that date are handled by the ongoing ONP Employee Concerns Program (ECP).
The ECSP addressed over 5800 employee concerns.
Each of the concerns was a
formal, written description of a circumstance or circumstances that an employee thought was unsafe, unjust, inefficient, or inappropriate.
The mission of the Employee Concerns Special Program was to thoroughly investigate all issues presented in the concerns and to report the results of those investigations in a form accessible to ONP employees, the
- NRC, and the general public.
The results of these investigations are communicated by four levels of ECSP reports:
- element, subcategory,
- category, and final.
Element reports, the lowest reporting level, will be published only for those concerns.directly affecting, the restart of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant's reactor unit 2.
An element consists of one or more closely related issues.
An issue is a potential problem identified by ECTG during the evaluation process as having been raised in one or more concerns.
For efficient handling what appeared to be similar concerns were grouped into elements early in the program, but issue definitions emerged from the evaluation process itself.
Consequently, some elements did include only one issue, but often the ECTG evaluation found more than one issue per element.
Subcategory reports summarize the evaluation of a number of elements.
- However, the subcategory report does more than collect element level evaluations.
The subcategory level overview of element findings leads to an integration of information that cannot take place at the element level.
This integration of information reveals the extent to which problems.
overlap more than one element and will therefore require corrective action for underlying causes not fully apparent at the element level.
To make the subcategory reports easier to understand, three items have been placed at the front of each report:
a preface, a glossary of the terminology unique to ECSP reports, and a list of acronyms
{terms formed from the first letters of a series of words).
Additionally, at the end of each subcategory report, the reader will find at least two attachments.
The first is a Subcategory Summary Table that includes the following information:
the concern
- number, a brief statement of the concern, and a designation of nuclear safety-related concerns.
The second attachment is a listing of the concerns included in each issue evaluated in the subcategory.
t~
a g'>>
4l If,
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 FRONT MATTER REV:
2 PAGE ii OF viii The subcategories are themselves summarized in a series of eight category reports.
Each category report reviews the major findings and collective significance of the subcategory reports in one of the following areas:
management and personnel relations industrial safety construction material control operations quality assurance/quality control welding engineering A separate report on employee concerns dealing with specific contentions of intimidation, harassment, and wrongdoing will be released by the TVA Office of the Inspector General.
Just as the subcategory reports integrate the information collected at the element level, the category reports integrate the information assembled in all the subcategory reports within the category, addressing particularly the underlying causes of those problems that run across more than one subcategory.
A final report will integrate and assess the information collected by all of the lower level reports prepared for the
- ECSP, including the Inspector General's
- report, For more detail on the methods by which ECTG employee concerns were evaluated and -reported, consult the Tennessee Valley Authority Employee Concerns Task Group Program Manual.
The Manual spells out the program's objectives,
- scope, organization, and responsibilities.
It also specifies the procedures that were followed in the investigation, reporting, and closeout of the issues raised by emplo'yee concerns.
I V Cl W gC
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 FRONT MATTER REV:
2 PAGE iii OF viii ECSP GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS" classification of evaluated issues the evaluation of an issue leads to one of the following determinations:
Class A:
Issue cannot be verified as factual Class B:
Issue is factually accurate, but what is described is not a
problem (i.eee not a condition requiring corrective action)
Class C:
Issue is factual and identifies a problem, but corrective action for the problem was initiated before the evaluation of the issue was undertaken Class D:
Issue is factual and presents a problem for which corrective action has
- been, or is being, taken as a result of an evaluation Class E:
A problem, requiring corrective action, which was not identified by an employee
- concern, but was revealed during the ECTG evaluation of an issue raised by an employee concern.
t collective si nificance an analysis which determines the importance and consequences of the findings in a particular ECSP report by putting those findings in the proper perspective.
concern (eee "employee concern")
corrective action steps taken to fix specific deficiencies or discrepancies revealed by a negative finding and, when necessary, to correct causes in order to prevent recurrence.
criterion lural:
criteria a basis for defining a performance,
- behavior, or quality which ONP imposes on itself (see also "requirement" >,
element or element re ort an optional level of ECSP report, below the
'subcategory level, that deals with one or more issues.
em lo ee concern a formal, written description of a circumstance or circumstances that an employee thinks unsafe, unjust., inefficient or inappropriate; usually documented on a K-form or a form equivalent to the K-form.
l A%%(
Jl
'r
'f
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 FRONT MATTER REV:
2 PAGE iv OF viii evaluator(s) the individual(s) assigned the responsibility to assess a specific grouping of employee concerns.
~findin s
includes both statements of fact and the judgments made about those facts during the evaluation process; negative findings require corrective actions issue a potential problem, as interpreted by the ECEG during the evaluation
- process, raised in one or more concerns.
K-form (see "employee concern")
evaluation judgment or decision may be based.
root cause the underlying reason for a problem,
"-Terms essential to the program but which require detailed definition have been defined in the ECTG Procedure Manual (e.gss generic, specific, nuclear safety-related, unreviewed safety-significant question),
li
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 FRONT MATTER REV:
2 PAGE v OF viii Acronyms AI AISC ALARA ANS ANSI ASME ASTM AWS BFN CAQ CAR CATD CCTS CEG-H CFR CI CMTR COC DCR DNC Administrative Instruction American Institute of Steel Construction As Low As Reasonably Achievable American Nuclear Society American National Standards Institute American Society of Mechanical Engineers American Society for Testing and Materials American Welding Society Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Condition Adverse to Quality Corrective Action Report Corrective Action Tracking Document Corporate Commitment Tracking System Category Evaluation Group Head Code of Federal Regulations Concerned Individual Certified Material Test Report Certificate of Conformance/Compliance Design Change Reguest Division of Nuclear Construction (see also NU CON)
V
'I C+V
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 FRONT MATTER REV:
2 PAGE vi OF viii DNE DNQA DNT DOE DPO DR ECN ECP Division of Nuclear Engineering Division of Nuclear Quality Assurance Division of Nuclear Training Department of Energy Division Personnel Officer Discrepancy Report or Deviation Report Engineering Change Notice Employee Concerns Program ECP-SR Employee Concerns Program-Site Representative ECSP ECTG EEOC EQ EMRT EN DES ERT FCR FSAR FY GET HCX HVAC XNPO IRN Employee Concerns Special Program Employee Concerns Task Group Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Environmental Qualification Emergency Medical Response Team Engineering Design Employee
Response
Team or Emergency
Response
Team Field Change Request Final Safety Analysis Report Fiscal Year, General Employee Training Hazard Control Xnstruction Heating, Ventilating, Air Condi'tioning Installation Xnstruction Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Inspection Rejection Notice
r.
$4 t
$ /I
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 FRONT MATTER REV:
2 PAGE vii OF viii L/R MRAI MI MSPB NCR NDE NPP NPS NQAM NRC NSB NSRS NU CON Labor Relations Staff Modifications and Additions Instruction Maintenance Instruction Merit Systems Protection Board Magnetic Particle Testing Nonconforming Condition Report Nondestructive Examination Nuclear Performance Plan Non-plant Specific or Nuclear Procedures System Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Services Branch Nuclear Safety Review Staff Division of Nuclear Construction (obsolete abbreviation, see DNC)
NUMARC Nuclear Utility Management and Resources Committee OSHA ONP OWCP PHR QA QAP QC QCI Occupational Safety and Health Administration (or Act)
Office of Nuclear Power Office of Workers Compensation Program Personal History Record Liquid Penetrant Testing Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Procedures Quality Control Quality Control Instruction
WIN l
i~
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 FRONT MATTER REV:
2 PAGE viii OF viii QCP QTC RIF RT SQN SI SOP SRP SWEC TAS TEL TVA TVTLC Quality Control Procedure Quality Technology Company Reduction in Force Radiographic Testing Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Surveillance Instruction Standard Operating Procedure Senior Review Panel Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation Technical Assistance Staff Trades and Labor Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee
-Valley Trades and Labor Council Ultrasonic Testing Visual Testing WBECSP Watts Bar Employee Concern Special Program WP Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Work Request or Work Rules Workplans
~
'A
~'Ifq 4-h
>/i',
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 2
OF 21 1.0 CHARACTERIZATION OF ISSUES Introduction This report evaluates thirteen issues raised about management's application of its overtime policies.
Many of the concerned individuals believe that management's methods of distributing overtime is biased and often based on personal friendships.
Other concerned individuals state that overtime is excessive and adversely affects both the quality of work performed and the health and safety of the work force.
There are 61 individual concerns in this subcategory; all but two were voiced by Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (MBN) employees.
The other two concerns, although not specific to MBN, were generic statements in that they were similar in content to those expressed by WBN employees.
This subcategory report was developed from a review of line management's response to 23 of the 61 concerns, from seven Quality Technology Company (QTC) investigative reports on individual
- concerns, and from the research efforts of the ECTG evaluator.
The subcategory report on Pork Schedules.(70300) addresses the scheduling of overtime for extended periods and the scheduled length of shifts, To locate the issue in which a particular concern is evaluated, consult the following attachments:
Attachment A, Subcategory Summary Table Attachment B, List of Concerns by Issue All Management and Personnel Category concerns having a technical component (including all concerns designated Nuclear Safety-Related) are shared with the appropriate technical category for investigation and resolution of that technical component.
Report(s) sharing a
concern with this report are identified in the entry for that concern on Attachment A.
1.2 Descri tion of Issues There are 61 concerns iw this subcategory report on Overtime (70400).
These 61 concerns are grouped into three elements addressing a total of 13 issues.
Six of the issues are in the Scheduling and Distributing Overtime element, four are 'n the Mandatory Overtime element, and the remaining three are in the Miscellaneous element.
=ri
+I
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 3
OF 21 1.2.1 Scheduling and Distributing Overtime A.
Issue 70401 - Overtime is not given out on an equal basis to all workers.
B.
Issue 70402 Overtime is not divided equally among all three shifts.
C.
Issue 70403 - An= insufficient number of support crafts are scheduled for overtime, resulting in production delays.
D.
Issue 70404 - Overtime opportunity is lost to employees who do not have security clearances.
E.
Issue 70405 Nuclear Services Branch (NSB) does the same type of work as Construction, but NSB personnel work all the overtime because they are members of "the buddy system."
F.
Issue 70406 - Overtime is not divided equally among truck drivers.
1.2.2 Mandatory Use of Overtime A.
Issue 70407 Employees are required to work excessive overtime.
B.
Issue 70408 - Employees are threatened with termination or other forms of discipline for refusing to work overtime.
C, Issue 70409 - Excessive overtime may be affecting the quality of work and the health and safety of employees.
D.
Issue 70410 Management does not provide adequate notice of overtime.
1.2.3 Miscellaneous Two concerns did not specifically fit into the preceding elements and therefore will be addressed in this report on an individual basis in section 4.0 (Findings) as well as the following two issues, A.
Issue 70411 - A request that the word "emergency" as it pertains to overtime at Sequoyah be defined.
B.
Issue 70412 - Management has instituted a practice of teamsters working overtime without supervision.
V Vy A~
<yw C
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER; 70400 REVISION NUMBER' PAGE 4
OF 21 The following two concerns were reviewed.
- However, they.
could not be investigated because they lacked clarity.
They are grouped under the following issue C.
Issue 70413 - Concerns with insufficient information to
- evaluate, IN-85-540-003 IN-85-540-004 2.0
SUMMARY
2.1 Summar of the Issues The issues in this report address management's application of overtime policies.
The major issues are (1) the efficient scheduling and fair distribution of overtime and (2) the abuse of management's right to require that employees work overtime.
2.2 Summar of Evaluation Process The evaluator has reviewed all the information available on the concerns in this subcategory.
The information pertinent to the evaluation of the issues has been considered and incorporated in this report.
This evaluation examined management's assignment of overtime.
A systematic evaluation process was followed, beginning with a review of each concern (K-form) and reference documents to establish the requirements and criteria that governed the issues.
Fifty-two interviews were conducted.
C 2.3 Summar of Findin s
The following were the major findings:
Employees were required to work overtime for extended periods (2-3 months).
Construction managers threatened employees with termination and other forms of discipline if they refused to work the scheduled overtime.
Some employees received more overtime than others because of their union contract provisions, differences in work assignments, job classifications, or security clearances.
4 '4 1C 4 i'l
>s
~ K I
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 5
OF 21 The Division of Nuclear Construction (DNC) Steamfitter Department at WBN failed to maintain required overtime records and practiced favoritism.
Within DNC, overtime is not normally divided equally among the three shifts because of scheduling practicality.
TVA and other organizations have conducted overtime studies which show that extended use of overtime may have adverse effects.
Much of the unequal distribution of overtime is the result of its assignment to the job steward per the "engaged in work" provisions in the negotiated agreements between TVA and the trades and labor unions.
The fewer the records on overtime distribution, the higher the complaint level.
The need for some overtime is unavoidable in the construction and operation of power plants.
However, faulty work scheduling can result in the working of unnecessary or counterproductive overtime.
2.4 Summar of Collective Si nificance While several things can be done to minimize the controversity over efficient allotment of overtime, the issue is not in need of immediate and extensive corrective action.
Problems involving overtime are unlikely to be solved to the satisfaction of everyone.
Some employees are asking for more overtime while others thought they were forced to work too many overtime hours.
Resentment over unfair overtime distribution increases when inadequate records are kept, Recent TVA studies suggest that overtime is only effective for limited time periods and should not be used over extended periods.
The studies conclude that excessive overtime is not only hard on the employees, but also is a sign of ineffective management.
2.5 Summary of Causes The General Agreement covering the work force hinders equal distribution of overtime.
Meanwhile, inaccurate work scheduling caused large amounts of overtime to be required during the attempt to load fuel in the unit 1 reactor.
2.6 Summar of Corrective Action ONP line management had already began to alleviate overtime situations by hiring contract employees and by borrowing 1VA personnel from other facilities.
rg peal~.
4w 1+
y I'g
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 6
OF 21 As a result of this evaluation, DNC management will propose removal of language in the General Agreement giving job stewards preference for overtime.
A DNC procedure will standardize the distribution and recording of overtime.
DNC will also issue guidelines for the use of overtime that reflect the findings of a recent TVA study of the problem.
3.0 EVALUATION PROCESS 3.1 Descri tion of Methodolo The evaluation was conducted according to the Evaluation Plan for the Employee Concerns Task Group and the Evaluation Plan for the Management and Personnel Group.
The concern case files were
- reviewed, Source documents were researched and interviews conducted in order to identify the requirements and criteria which applied to the issues addressed in the concerns.
The issues were evaluated against the identified requirements and criteria to determine the findings.
A collective significance analysis was performed to determine the importance and consequences of the findings; causes were indicated for negative findings; and corrective action for the negative findings was initiated or determined to have already been initiated.
3.2 S ecific Methodolo An analysis of the issues and miscellaneous concerns was conducted to determine if the circumstances and timeframe under which these concerns were submitted were of significance to the evaluation process.
Overtime records, grievance reports, and personnel data were collected and analyzed.
A review was conducted of 23 previous line management responses to individual, concerns and of seven investigative reports prepared by QTC on individual concerns.
The comments from these responses and investigations were incorporated into the Findings Section (4,0).
Fifty-two interviews were conducted with ONP corporate and line
- managers, labor relations (L/R) staff members, craft union representatives, craft foremen, and journeymen.
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 7
OF 21
'.0 FINDINGS 4.1
~Back round 4.1.1 Overtime Provisions ONP does not have an explicit corporate policy governing the assignment of overtime; consequently, each division has in the past formulated its own overtime procedures to accommodate divisional needs and objectives.
These procedures have followed the overtime provisions contained within the negotiated contract agreement(s),
and have complied with NRC overtime restrictions, TVA negotiated three separate General Agreements with the Tennessee Valley Trades and Labor Council (TVTLC) covering trades and labor employees working in the following capacities:
1.
Construction employees 2.
Annual operating and maintenance employees 3.
Temporary hourly operating, maintenance and modification employees.
Additionally, all annual salary policy employees are represented on overtime matters by the Salary Policy Employee Panel in accordance with the Articles of A reement.
None of TVA's negotiated employee agreements contain specific provisions requiring employees to work overtime.
- TVA, however, has always maintained this right as indicated in the following excerpt Xrom a memorandum issued on April 27, 1982, to All Construction Project Managers from Horace H. Mull, who was then Manager of Construction:
This division has consistently interpreted the General Agreement as allowing TVA management the right to require employees to work overtime.
That right is not specifically stated in the Agreement but, where labor agreements are silent on the subject, management has the right to make reasonable demands Xor overtime work from employees.
Such interpretation is supported by text writers on labor agreements and numerous arbitration awards.
P4
'li*
'I 4
'Pa
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 8
OF 21 Broadly stated, if the overtime is scheduled (i.e.,
the employee is notified in advance), it is required as is any scheduled workday.
In an emergency situation when an insufficient number of employees volunteer for overtime, it is proper to specifically direct employees to work.
Additionally, in cases where trades and labor employees have questioned the scheduling of overtime, management has also relied upon the following contract language contained in Article II of all three General Agreements.
The Council and its member organizations will not permit their members to engage in work stoppages or to refuse to perform work as assigned, nor sanction their leaving the service, pending settlement of issues and disputes, In an effort to prevent arbitrary award of overtime, TVA's three trades and labor (TEL) bargaining agreements have distribution-of-overtime clauses.
Though slightly different in
- language, the intent of the three agreements is to require management to distribute overtime work among the qualified employees engaged in the work activities at the time it is determined overtime is necessary.
All three contracts state that:
"Overtime records will be made available upon request to the labor representative."
The General A reement covering Construction employees outlines the distribution of overtime with the following language:
Every possible effort will be made to avoid overtime and to conform to bulletined scheduled hours of work.
When overtime work is necessary, management shall distribute such overtime work among those qualified employees engaged in the work activity at the time it is determined overtime is necessary in that specific work activity.
Job stewards will not be limited in the amount of overtime worked, and a steward will be worked on any overtime work in his job classification provided he is qualified to do the work.
If overtime work occurs for which a job steward is not classified or qualified, he will appoint a temporary steward to represent him while the overtime work is 'being performed.
Overtime records will be made available upon request to the labor representative.
- t 5l Fg
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 9
OF 21 4.1.2 Overtime Recordkeeping To assist in the control and distribution of overtime, and to comply with the General Agreements, each division has established recordkeeping procedures for its TEL work force.
While no standardized procedure exists, each division has attempted to record not only actual overtime hours worked but also overtime turned down or refused.
This information is processed within the Office of Nuclear Power (ONP) by the Payroll Section and encoded into a
computer data base which enables managers and labor representatives to periodically review overtime printouts.
The Division of Nuclear Construction (DNC), formerly the Division of Construction, has a considerably less formal procedure.
Only a monthly overtime report sheet is completed by the craft superintendent, generally with the assistance of the craft job steward.
Since the Articles of A reement does not contain overtime distribution provisions or mandate the maintenance of overtime records, most divisional managers only record hours of overtime actually worked for annual salary policy (ASP) employees.
4.1.3 Review of Overtime Grievances The review of site-generated overtime grievances revealed that between January 1984 and December 1985 five overtime grievances were filed by ONP's Operating and Maintenance employees, During the same timeframe, 110 employees in construction filed grievances, with 72 of those involving the steamfitter craft.
The review also revealed that the steamfitter management in DNC has failed to maintain the standard overtime records since 1983.
This problem exists despite the fact that in December
- 1985, the General Construction Superintendent, Ben F. Painter, issued a memorandum reminding his craft superintendents and job stewards about the importance of "maintaining good overtime records."
No other craft was found negligent, nor were the any other divisions in ONP.
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 10 OF 21 4.2 Schedulin and Distributin Overtime 4.2.1 Issue 70401 Overtime is not given out on an equal basis to all workers Discussion This aspect of the issue was factually accurate.
Provisions in the Construction General A reement allow the craft job stewards the first opportunity to work
- overtime, Where job stewards have exercised this contract provision, such as in the electrical craft, payroll records show that these job stewards (three in all) have received ten times the amount of overtime as other electricians.
Some individuals interviewed stated that this practice was outdated and a source of resentment among the work force.
This evaluator noted that the other two general agreements covering TEL employees do not contain language which favors the craft job steward in overtime.
Overtime and manpower figures support the allegations that steamfitters affiliated with Chattanooga's steamfitters local union (Local 43) are favored in overtime.
An analysis of MBN Construction manpower force reports for June 1986 shows that of the 358 steamfitters
- employed, 166 or 46 percent were members of the Chattanooga local with the remaining 54 percent affiliated with other union locals.
Upon reviewing DNC steamfitter payroll records for the first six months of 1986, the following was discovered.
l.
A total of 50 steamfitters worked more than 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br /> of overtime with 72 percent (36 out of 50) affiliated with the Chattanooga local.
2.
A total of 37 employees worked more than 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> of overtime with 76 percent (28 out of 37) affiliated with the Chattanooga local.
3.
A total of 14 employees worked more than 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> of
- overtime, and all were affiliated with the Chattanooga local.
h e
. tl I,
S>>
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 11 OF 21 Construction steamfitter payroll records for calendar year 1985 revealed similar findings, A total of 575 steamfitters were on the payroll during 1985 with 297 or 52-percent members of the Chattanooga local.
Looking, at the dollar values, there were 27 steamfitters whose overtime earnings exceeded
$ 7,500 with 59-percent (16 out of 27) affiliated with the Chattanooga local.
Thirteen steamfitters earned more than
$10,000 with 92-percent (12 out of 13) affiliated with the Chattanooga local.
In interviews with employees concerning management's distribution of overtime, numerous interviewees cited as an example of favoritism the group of DNC steamfitters organized to support the Welding Task Group (WTG). It was alleged that the steamfitters selected to work with WTG were friends of steamfitter supervision and were all members of the Chattanooga local 43.
This evaluator investigated the formation of this support group, and concludes that the alleged favoritism does constitute a
problem based on the following information:
1.
The selection criteria used effectively eliminated nonlocal union members from consideration.
The WTG supervisors were looking for steamfitters with foreman or sketchman experience who were also technically oriented and familiar with document control, Historically, such construction steamfitter's positions have been filled with Chattanooga Local 43 personnel rather than with out-of-local union workers.
2.
On June 15,
- 1986, there were nine steamfitters temporarily assigned to support the WTG.
All nine were affiliated with the Chattanooga Local 43.
3.
As of June 15, 1986, 29 steamfitters'ames had been submitted as possible candidates to assist WTG.
Twenty-eight of these were affiliated with the Chattanooga local.
4.
The only out-of-local steamfitter referred to the task group worked approximately one week, before the WTG supervisors decided he was incompatible with the other members and returned him to his former position.
0l, F%
<<!<
~LJ
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 19 OF 21 4.4.3 Issue 70413 - Concerns with insufficient information to evaluate.
The following two concerns were reviewed but no further investigation occurred because they lacked clarity.
IN-85-540-003 IN-85-540-004 5.0 COLLECTIVE SIGNIFICANCE 1.
While several things can be done to handle the use of overtime more efficiently and less controversially, the issues addressing overtime do not identify critical problems in need of immediate and extensive corrective action.
2.
The assignment of overtime is an issue never likely to be solved to the satisfaction of everyone involved.
Thirty-two of the concerns in this subcategory
- were, in effect, asking for more overtime.
On the other hand, 27 concerns implied employees were forced to work too much overtime.
3.
Resentment among those who do not get as much overtime as they want increases greatly when records on how overtime is distributed are lacking or inadequate to show fair distribution.
The one craft in DNC which failed to keep overtime records generated the majority of the concerns about unfair overtime distribution.
4.
The evidence developed in this ECTG evaluation supports other
- studies, including TVA's own overtime utilization studies, which have determined that overtime is only effective for limited time periods and should not be used routinely.
Although overtime is an inevitable part of the construction phase of a nuclear power plant, forced overtime beyond the limits suggested in the studies is not only hard on employees, it is also a clear sign of ineffective management.
6.0 CAUSES 6.1 General A reement Provisions While the General A reement covering DNC's T6L work force contains overtime distribution language, the language often hinders fair distribution.
The General A reement states that the craft steward "will not be limited in the amount of overtime worked and a job steward will be worked on any overtime work in his job classification provided he is qualified to do the work,"
pter
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 20 OF 21 Also, contractually, management has an obligation to distribute
- overtime, but it must do so "among those qualified employees engaged in the work activity at the time it is determined overtime is necessary in that specific work activity."
Most craft managers claim that this latter process is the exclusive procedure for handling overtime.
Additionally, this requirement often prevents an even distribution of overtime because individuals assigned to work overtime activities cannot be removed from these assignments and replaced by other employees even if the intent is to equalize overtime.
Steamfitter personnel interviewed claimed that craft management used this previously mentioned overtime provision to assign overtime work favored group of individuals.
They allege that a supervisor with advance knowledge about the priorities of a work assignment would purposely assign the work to a favored crew knowing that at a
later date overtime work would develop.
At that time, other individuals not engaged in the work activity could not claim a share of the overtime.
This evaluation concludes that both the job steward advantage and the abuse of the "engaged in the work" provisions have contributed to the uneven distribution of overtime, 6.2 Inaccurate Schedulin The completion dates for work activities to meet fuel load requirements were rescheduled five times.
This resulted in employees having to work long hours in an attempt to meet what proved to be unmeetable schedules.
This scheduling problem impacted the workload, prohibited correct
- staffing, and ultimately caused many of the mandatory overtime difficulties.
7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION 7.1 Previousl Initiated Corrective Actions-Management has reevaluated remaining work at VBN, and has established a schedule which should be achievable without requiring the working of large amounts of overtime, Manpower levels have been adjusted in affected sections to help alleviate overtime situations.
Contract employees have been hired and TVA personnel borrowed from other plants to help reduce workload.
W'I
- tIr, I
't 4
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT NUMBER:
70400 REVISION NUMBER:
4 PAGE 21 OF 21 7.2 Corrective Action As a Result of This Evaluation As a result of this evaluation, line management has committed to the following three phase corrective action plan:
(CATD No. 704-NPS-01) l.
At the next Wage Conference where Supplementary Schedule H-VX can be reopened for negotiation, the DNC will propose that preferential assignment of overtime to the job steward be removed from the General A reement covering construction employment.
2.
A procedure will be issued standardizing the methods to be used to distribute and record overtime and to delegate the responsibility for maintenance of overtime records.
4 3.
DNC will review the report, "Evaluation of Overtime Utilization On TVA Construction Plant," dated January 9, 1985, and will issue guidelines on use of overtime.
8.0 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Subcategory Summary Table Attachment B List of Concerns by Issue
J'a4 I*,
l Ij A
1 fAt pt. ~
- FEREHCE ECPS132J-ECPS132C
- EQUEIICY REQUEST IP - ISSS - RHII EGORY:
HP t'IGT.
8t PERS.
ISSUES A
HEHT A TEtltlESSEE LEY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF tIUCLEAR POIIER EHPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAH SYSTEM (ECPS)
EHPLOYEE COtlCERtl ItlFORt1ATIOtl BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY'044 OVERTIHE tlOT GIVEN OUT OH Atl EQUAL BASIS PA 1
RUH TINE 10: 04: 39 RUtl DATE - 03/10/87
- OIICERtl IIUHBER CAT S
H SUB R PLT CAT D
LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2
SAF RELATED BF BL SQ IIB HISTORICAL REPORT CONCERN ORIGIN COtlCERtl DESCRIPTION REF.
SECT IOtl CAT tlP SUBCAT 704
- 105"00501 T50201
- "85-108-00601 T50201
( 129-00301 T50202
'85"154"00401 T50206 NP 70401 tl IIBN IIP 70401 H IIBN thP 70401 tl I'IBN Hl'0401 N HBN 1 tl tl tl H
2 HA tlA WA tlA 1
H tl tl tl 2
HA tlA WA HA 1N tl H
H 2 tlA tlA tIA HA ltl HHH 2
HA WA HA HA EX-85"105-005 QTC EX-85"108-006 QTC EX-85-129-003 QTC EX-85-1544-004 QTC OVERTIt1E IS HOT GIVEN OUT Otl A FAIR AND EQUAL BASIS IIITH ALL IIORKERS.
C OHSTRUCTIOH DEPT.
COIICERtl.
CI HAS tl 0
tIAHES OR ADDITIONAL IHFORIPATIOH.
-GEIIERIC CONCERN" OVERTIHE IS HOT GIVEtl OUT FAIRLY.
F RIEtlDS OF HAtlAGEI1EHT ARE FAVORED.
C OHSTRUCTIOH DEPT.
CONCERN.
CI HAS W
0 ADDITIONAL IHFORI1ATIOW.
-GENERIC COtICERH-OVERTIHE IS NOT OFFERED EQUALLY TO C
REIIS.
SOHE FOREt1Etl (KIIOlltl) GET tlORE OVERTIthE THAIS OTHERS.
COtlSTRUCTIOW DEPT.
COtlCERtl.
CI HAS tl0 FURTHER I tIFORHATIOW.
OWE WORKER (KHOHW) GETS TO HORK AHYH HERE FROH 30K TO 50Ã NORE OVERTII1E T HAtl OTHERS Itl THE SANE CREIIp YET GET S
TO TAKE IIEEKEtlDS OFF HHEHEVER COIIV EHIEHT.
THIS IS UNFAIR TO CO-IIORKER S.
CI HAD HO FURTHER ItlFORI1ATIOtl.
COtlSTRUCTIOII DEPT.
COtICERW. 237-SQtl 01 t1P 70411 tl SQN 1
W tl H
W 2 tIA HA HA WA HSRS AH AHOHYHOUS INDIVIDUAL t1AILED IH A SAFETY COtlCERtl TO HSRS REQUESTItlG TH AT THE IIORD "EI1ERGEtlCY" AS IT PERTAI tIS TO OVERTIHE AT SQH BE DEFItlED.
I "85"034-00101 T50060 tlP 70409 H flBH 1 tl
)I W
tl 2 tlA tlA tlA WA Itl"85-034-001 QTC CI IS COIICERHED THAT EXCESSIVE OVERT Il'1E BEING I'IORKED BY CRAFT COULD ADVE RSELY AFFECT THE QUALITY OF COIISTRUC TIOW AT IIATTS BAR SITE.
EXAt1PLE:
DU RIHG APRIL/HAY 1985p 2 ISC ELECTRICI AtlS (tlAI1E KtlOIIW) IIORKED EXCESSIVE OV ERTINE (68 HOURS OT AND 71HOURS OT I W
A 2 IIEEK PERIOD).
CI COULD HOT PR OVIDE AHY OTHER IIIFORHATIOtl OR SPECI FIC AREAS Itl THE PLAtlT WHERE QUALITY OF COWSTRUCTIOtl IIAS EFFECTED COtlCERtlS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY HUHBER.
I, I
Qfn la~
U, Qj 4g I
!FEREIIC.
ECPS132J-ECPS132C
'EQUEtlCY
- REQUEST IP - ISSS - RIII1 i EGORY:
t1P t1GT.
& PERS.
ISSUES TEtltlESSEE LEY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF tlUCLEAR POHER EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAM SYSTEt1 (ECPS)
EtIPLOYEE COtlCERtl ItlFORt1ATIOtl BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY'06 EtlPLOYEES THREATEIIED-TERIPIHATIOH FOR REFUSIHG OT PA 2
RUtl TIME 10: 06: 39 RUtl DATE - 03/10/87 S
H SUB R PLT
- OIICERH IIUI1BER CAT CAT D
LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2 SAF RELATED BF BL SQ NB HISTORICAL CONCERN REPORT ORIGItl CONCERN DESCRIPTIOW REF.
SECTIOtl CAT MP SUBCAT 70<)
I "85-061-00101 IH 60200 S
HBtI T5007 ii 02 MP 70608 S
IIBH 1N tl H
Y 2
HA WA WA HO 18 W
tl W
2 HA HA HA HA QTC CRAFT SUPERItlTEIIDEIIT (IIAME GIVEN) TH REATEtlED TO FIRE C/I AIID C/I'S CO-IIO RKERS FOR tlOT IIORKIIIG OVERTItlE.
DAT E THIS OCCURRED AHD FURTHER IIIFORIIAT IOtl Itl ERT FILE.
FURTHER DETAILS t'1I GHT BREACH C/I'S COHFIDEtlTIALITY.
I 116-00101 IH 60200 S IIBtl 1
tl H
H Y
T50078 2 IIA HA tlA HO 02 MP 70408 S
IIBH 1
tl tl tl H
2 HA tlA HA ttA I 139-00101 IH 60600 S HBtt 1
T50088 2
02 tlP 70608 S
HBN 1 tl N
H
'H 2 IIA HA HA HA I l<i7-00201 MP 70607 H MBtl 1
tl tl tl N
T50220 2
HA HA HA HA QTC QTC QTC CRAFT SUPERItlTEtlDEtlT (tlAI1E GIVEN) TH REATEttED TO TERMINATE C/I AtlD APPROX OTHER IIORKERS IW C/I'S CREII FOR FAILING TO HORK OVERTIME.
OVER A HEE KEHD.
ADDITIOttAL ItlFORt1ATIOW Itl FIL E
BUT THESE DETAILS COULD BREACH C/I
'S COtlFIDEtlTIALITY.
CI AWD CO-HORKERS HERE THREATENED HI TH TERMItlATIOtl BY GEtlERAL FOREI1AII (tl AI1E KtlOIIH) AND CRAFT SUPERItlTEtlDEtlT (HAMf KtlOlltl) FOR FAILING TO llORK OVE RTIt'IE Oll THE IIEEKEIID.
FURTHER It(FOR MATIOtl Itl FILE BUT I'IOULD JEOPARDIZE CI'S CONFIDENTIALITY.
EtlGItlEERIWG PERSOHIIEL (UNIT KtlOIltl) H AD TO IIORK EXCESSIVE OVERTIME DUE TO POOR MAtlAGEMEtlT PLAlltlItlG.
COtlSTRUC TIOH DEPARTMENT CONCERN.
ADDITIOIIAL ItlFORt1ATIOtl KtlOI'IH TO QTCp I'IITHHELD DUE TO COHFIDEIITIALITY. CI HAS WO F
URTHfR ItlFORt1ATIOH.
I -85"157-00101 T50025 02 IH 60200 S IIBfI 1
tl tt H
Y IW-85"157-001 2
HA WA HA HO MP 70<)08 S
)<BII 1 tl 1I tl H
2 tlA WA t<A HA QTC SUPERVISOR (tlAMf KtlOIltl) THREATftlED T 0 FIRE A CRAFTSMAN IIHO IIILL tlOT IIORK OVERTIME Otl I'IEEKEtlDS.
THE IIIDIVIDU AL'S BRASS IIAS PULLED OUT BECAUSE HE DID IIOT IIORK Otl A HEEKEtlD THIS HAPP EWED TIIO IIEEKS AGO.
(APPROX 5/5 OR 5/2 OF 1985)
THE CRAFTSMAtl IIAS THREA TEWED BY SUPERVISIOtl (HAt1E KtlOIIW).
INVOLVES INSULATOR CRAFTSMEN GROUP COtlCERIIS ARE GROUPED BY'FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY NUMBER.
I p
kta A
l 4
'i 1
ie
- FEREHCE ECPS132 J-ECPS132C
'EQUEHCY REQUEST IP ISSS RHH EGORY:
tlP HGT.
8 PERS.
ISS0ES TEHtlESSEE LEY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HUCLEAR POllER EtlPLOYEE COWCERH PROGRAH SYSTEH (ECPS)
Et'tPLOYEE COWCERtl IWFORMATIOH BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY'06 IHADEQUATE WOTICE OF OVERTItlE PA 3
RUtl TItlE 10: Opl: 39 RUtl DATE 03/10p'87 S
H SUB R PLT
- OtlCERW tlUMBER CAT CAT D LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2 SAF RELATED BF BL SQ tlB HISTORICAL COHCERW REPORT ORIGIH COHCERW DESCRIPTIOW REF.
SECTIOH CAT thP SUBCAT 701 I 159-00301 t1P 70610 H HBtl T50061 1W H
tl W
2 WA tlA HA HA QTC CI DOES tlOT LIKE THE HAY OT IS HAtlDL ED.
tlOTICE TO HORK OT IS GIVEH LATE OH FRIDAY.
UtlIOll REQUIRES 24 TO 48 HRS tlOTICE.
l -85"172-00201 T50088 t1P 70401 H l'lBtl 1 tl H
H tl IH-85-172"002 2
WA HA HA tN QTC CRAFT (IHSULATORS) TPEATED UtlFAIRLY REGARDItlG OVERTItlE HORKp POSSIBLE DI SCRIHItNTIOtt.
ADDITIOtlAL DETAILS Itl FILE ~
RELEASE OF DETAILS COULD CON PROMISE CI'S COtlFIDEtlTIALITY.
I 180-00301 IH 60200 S
HBH 1 tl tl tl Y
T50267 i
2 HA HA IN tl0 02 HP 70<i08 S
HBN 1
H tl tl tl 2
WA WA HA HA l 18i-00701 IH 60200 S llBH 1
W tl tl Y
T50258 2 tN HA tlA tlO 02 HP 70408 S
l<BW 1
tl H
H tl 2
HA HA tN HA l 182-00101 HP 70008 W l<Btt tl H
tl tl T50199 2
WA WA HA HA QTC QTC QTC TVA HAtNGEHEttT THREATEtlS A SPECIFIC CRAFT (KHOHW) THAT IHDIVIDUALLYOR A
S A GROUP.
THEY HILL BE TERtlItIATED IF THEY REFUSE TO llORK OVERTIt1E.
CO HSTRUCTIOH DEPARTHEHT COHCERW.
CI H
AS HO FURTHER IWFORHATIOH.
EtlPLOYEES llHO HAD 110RKED EXCESSIVE 0
VERTItlE llERE THREATEtlED HITH TERt11tlA TIOH BY A SUPERVISOR (HAttE KHOHH) IF THEY DID HOT COtlTItlUE TO t<ORK OVERT IHE.
COWSTRUCTIOW DEPARTtlEtlT CotlCER H.
CI HAS HO FURTHER ItlFORtlATIOtl.
IHADEQUATE ttAHAGEttEttT POLICIES TO SC HEDULE OVERTItlE (tlOT GIVItlG ADVAHCE HOTICE FOR OVERTIttE)
AHD THREATEtlItlG EHPLOYEES WITH DISCIPLIWARY ACTIOH SUCH AS COUtlTItlG ABSEtlCEp RESULTED I H
LOH HORALE.
THIS OCCURRED Itl JA!lU ARY-FEBRUARY 1985.
AtlY FURTHER ItlFO RtlATIOtl llOULD COt1PROttISE COHFIDEtlTIA LITY.
COHSTRUCTIOH DEPT.
COHCERH.
CI HAS HO FURTHER IHFORHATIOW.
COHCERtlS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY tlUttBER.
4j>>
iaaf
~ e ~
y liP 1Jt
- FEREtlC ECPS132 J-ECPS132C iEQUEIICY REQUEST IP - ISSS RHH EGORY:
t1P HGT.
8 PERS.
ISSUES TEWtIESSEE
.LEY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF NUCLEAR POllER EHPLOYEE COtlCERN PROGRAH SYSTEH (ECPS)
EHPLOYEL COIICERtt IWFORtlATIO!l BY CATEGORYiSUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY) 70<<
EXCESSIVE OT AFFECTS WORK QUALITY 8 EtlPL.
HEALTH PA RUtl TIHE 10:0<<:39 RUW DATE 03/10/87
- OtlCERtl tlUtlBER I 18<<-00101 T50238 CAT S
H SUB R PLT CAT D LOC HP 70<<09 tl HBN 1
REPORT APPL 2 SAF RELATED BF BL SQ HB 1
W tl t)
W 2 tlA tlA tlA tIA HISTORICAL COtlCERtl REPORT ORIGIN QTC CONCERN DESCRIPTIOW lIORKItlG DOUBLE SHIFTSi ESPECIALLY FR Otl EVEIIIWG SHIFT TO THIRD SHIFT OR T HIRD SHIFT TO DAYS LEAVES EHPLOYEES VERY FATIGUED AtlD LESS ALERT OR UWAB LE TO PERFORI1 THEIR ASSIGNED DUTIES.
COtlCERII IS GEtlERIC.
tl0 SPECIFICS.
CONSTRUCTION DEPARTHEWT CONCERN.
CI DECLIIIED TO PROVIDE ADDITIOtIAL Itl FORt1ATIOtl.
WO FOLLOH UP REQUIRED.
REF.
SECTIOII CAT
- IIP SUBCAT 70<<
I 186-00701 HP 70<<08 S
HBN 1 tl tl tl tl T50017 2 tIA WA NA tlA 02 HP 70<<09 S IIBtl 1
W tl tl W
2 WA WA WA WA QTC CRAFTS (VARIOUS DISCIPLINES)
ROUTINE LY WORK 10-l<<HRS A DAYp 7
DAYS A IIE EK.
THIS HAS A DEFINITE tlEGATIVE EF FECT OW THE CRAFTS ABILITY TO PERFOR M QUALITY WORK It) AW EFFECTIVE thAIIIIE R.
IF THEY TAKE OFF 7 DAYS OR t'IORE IW SIX t10WTHS THEY HILL BE TERI1IWATE D HITH Atl S-3 HHICH IS "tIOT" ELIGIBL E
FOR REHIRE.
I 256-00101 T50026 02 292"00201 T50020
'I 316-00<<01 T5017<<
IH 60200 S
HBN 1
tl tl tl Y
IW-85-256-001 2
WA tlA IIA NO t1P 70<<08 S
HBW 1
tl tl tl tl 2 tlA tlA NA NA HP 70<<03 N HBN 1
W tl W
W Itl-85-292-002 2 tlA tIA WA tlA HP 70<<05 N HBN 1
tl W
tl tl Itl"85-316-00<<
2 tlA WA tlA tlA QTC QTC QTC C/I AtID HIS CREI< (tIAHES KtlOlltl) IIERE THREATEtlED I<1TH DISCHARGE BY GE)IERAL FOREHAW FOR tIOT I'IORKItlG O.T.
(HEEKE tlD) AFTER THEY llERE TOLD Otl A HED.
8 THURS.
THAT THERE IIOULD BE tl0 IIEEKE tlD 0. T..
tIAHES OF IIIDIVIDUALSt1AKItl G THREATS ARE KtIOHW.
IIICIDEtlT OCCUR RED LATE APRIL EARLY t1AY 1985.
ItISUFFICIEtlT tlUt1BER OF SUPPORT CRAFT (CARPENTERS 8 PIPE FITTERS)
SCHEDUL ED FOR OVERTII1E IW RELATION TO SKILL ED CRAFTp RESULTItIG IW DELAYS 8 LOSS OF SKILLED CRAFT PRODUCTIVITY NUCLEAR SERVICE BRAIICH DOES THE SAINTE TYPE IIORK DOtlE BY THE COtlSTRUCTIOW DEPARTIPEIIT, BUT THEY ARE ALL t1EHBERS OF THE "BUDDY" SYSTEHp AIID SO tlSB G
ETS ALL OF THE OVERTII1E (Itl t1AIIY CAS ES 7
DAYS A IIEEKi 12 HOURS A DAYi AR OUtID THE CLOCK).
COtlST.
DEPT.
COtlCE RW.
CI HAS IIO FURTHER ItlFORtlATIOII.
tl0 FOLLOII UP REQUIRED.
COtlCERtlS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY tIUHBER.
4 "J'
g qJ1'-
Jr
~
t "I
A\\IIir
)f
\\
'lL t
4 0
C
- FEREWC ECPS132 J-ECPS132C
.'EQUENCY
" REQUEST IP - ISSS RHN EGORY:
NP tlGT. 8 PERS.
ISSUES TEtlNESSEE LEY AUTHORITY PA
5 OFFICE OF NUCLEAR POHER RUtl TINE - 10:Oct:39 Et1PLOYEE COIICERtl PROGRAN SYSTEN (ECPS)
RUH DATE 03/10/87 ENPLOYEE CONCERN ItlFORNATIOH BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY:
70<1 INSUFFICIEtIT SUPPORT CRAFTS SCHEDULED FOR OVERTIt1E S
H SUB R PLT
'.OIICERH NUtlBER CAT CAT D LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2 SAF RELATED DF BL SQ IIB HISTORICAL CONCERN REPORT ORIGIN CONCERN DESCRIPTIOW REF.
SECTIOII CAT t1P SUBCAT 7 0~)
I 316-00901 NP 70003 tl HBtl T50176 1N tl W
N 2
HA WA IIA HA I 331-00101 T5002<i t1P 70601 H IIBtl 1
tl H
tl W
It)-85-331-001 2 tlA tlA tlA tlA QTC QTC STEAI1FITTERS ARE tlOT ALLONED TO WORK HEEKEWDS.
OTHER CRAFTS1 SUCH AS EL ECTRICIAWSp ALNAYS HAVE PERSONNEL Otl DUTY TO RESPOttD IIHEI< PROBLENS ARISE BECAUSE STEAIPFITTERS AREN'T PRESE tlT TO tlOVE AIR HOSES>
ETC. p OTHER CR AFTS DO THIS IIORK.
CI HAS HO tlORE I HFORI'IATIOW.
COHST.
DEPT.
CONCERN.
tl0 FOLLOI< UP REQUIRED.
OVERTItlE IS HOT BEING DISTRIBUTED EV EtlLY TO ALL IIORKERS (SPECIFIC CRAFT IS KtlOlltl).
SELECTED CRENS ARE GIVEtl ALL AVAILABLEOVERTINE IIITH AHY EXT RA HAtlDED OUT AS REQUIRED I 370"00201 T50098 NP 70601 tl NBtl 1
H tl tl H
Itl-85-370-002 2 tIA WA WA WA QTC OVERTItlE PREDOt1ItlAHTLY ASSIGtlED TO S
UPERVISOR'S FRIEND (BOTH tlAt1ES KtlOHtl TO ERT).
QUALIFICATIOHS HOT COWSID ERED WHEN APPORTIOtlItlG OVERTIt1E.
It)
DIVIDUAL ASSIGIIED HOST OVERTINE NAS ALSO GIVEtl EXTRA tlOT-TECHNICAL FUtlCT IOIIS BASED OH BUDDY SYSTEII TO EtlSURE THAT HE WOULD ALSO GET NOST OF THE OVERTItlEp BUT AtlY NENBER OF THIS GRO UP IS QUALIFIED TO DO IIORK DOtlE OH 0 VERTINE.
CI HS tlO FURTER ItlFORNATIO tl.
I "85-371-00101 NP 70412 N IIBtl 1
W tl tl W
T50098 2
HA tlA llA tlA QTC TVA MAtlAGEtlEHT (KIIONtl) HAS PREVEtlTED TEAt1STERS FRON NORKIIIG OVERTINE Otl HEEKEIIDSp AHD HAS ItlSTITUTED PRACTIC E
OF TEANSTERS IIORKItIG HITHOUT SUPER VISION.
THIS GOES AGAINST PAST TVA PRACTICE.
tlAHAGENEWT DISCRINIHATES AGAItlST PAST TVA PRACTICE.
IIAI)AGEIIE HT DISCRINItlATES AGAItlST TEANSTER "W
ORKIWG" FOREtlAtl POLICY.
ADDITIOtlAL DETAILS (WANES AWD PRACTICES)
AVAILA BLE.
CI HAS tl0 NORE SPECIFICS.
COWCERtlS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY tlUNBER ~
ta
'C'g,
$g 1 f' 1
- FEREtlCE ECPS132 J-ECPS132C
'EQUEtlCY REQUEST IP ISSS RHtl EGORY 4 I'1P HGT.
8 PERS.
ISSUES TFtltlESS EE L EY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF NUCLEAR POINTER Et1PLOYEE COIICERH PROGRAM SYSTEII (ECPS)
Et1PLOYEE COtICERN INFORHATIOtl BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY4 7044 INADEQUATE NOTICE OF OVERTII'1E PA 6
RUtl TINE 10406439 RUtl DATE 03/10/87 S
H SUB R PLT
- OtlCERH tIUHBER CAT CAT D LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2 SAF RELATED BF BL SQ l'IB HISTORICAL CONCERN REPORT ORIGItl CONCERN DESCRIPTION REF.
SECTION CAT t1P SUBCAT 70i4 I 4460-00201 tlP 70610 N IIBtI T500c40 1
tl tl tl W
2 NA HA HA HA QTC HAIIAGEtIEHT SHOULD BE ABLE TO tlOTIFY CRAFTtlEtl Otl IIEDtlESDAY IF OVERTIHE III LL BE REQUIRED RATHER THAW Otl FRIDAY I 480-00201 I'1P 704402 tl llBtl 1
H tl tl H
T50038 2 HA,tIA WA tIA QTC HAHAGEHENT DISCRIHIWATES At10HG CREllS SOt1E CREHS GET ALL THE OVERTIt)E A tID NEVER HAVE TO lIORK 2tlD/3RD SHIFTS THIS CREATES LOll IIORALE.
I 4490-00301 T50029 tlP 704401 N HBN 1
tl W
H H
Itl-85-4490-.003 2
WA HA-HA WA QTC OVERTItlE IS DISTRIBUTED AHONG CREl'IS UNFAIRLY I <492-00201 IH 604400 S IIBtl 1
T50036 2
02 IIP 70408 S llBH 1
tl tl tl 2
HA tIA tN tIA QTC MAtIAGEHEHT THREATEtlED TO FIRE CRAFT FOR WOT HORKItlG Otl A llEEKEtlD HHEtI TH EY HAD OWLY BEEt) ASKED IF THEY HAHTE D TO llORK.
ALL HAD SAID tl0.
(tlAHES
/DETAILS KWONII TO QTC)
I "85-492-00701 tIP 70007 H I'IBtl 1
H N
tl H
T50029 2 tN WA HA HA I 5i40-00301 tlP 70013 H
1IBH 1 tl H
tl N
T500<45 2 tlA HA WA tlA I -855<4000601 HP 704413 tl IIBtl 1
H tl H
H T500<45 2
HA HA HA NA QTC QTC QTC SOHE GROUPS HAVE EXPERIENCED LARGE L
AY OFFS IIHICH CAUSED HAtIAGEHEIIT TO P
UT RENAIHItlG PERSONNEL Otl HADATORY S EVEN DAY I'IEEKSi 8
10 HRS PER DAY
(
NAtlES/DETAILS KWOIIW TO QTC)
THE GEtlERAL AGREEt1EWT IIAS VIOLATED II HEtl HAWAGEHEIIT ALLOWED At( EI1PLOYEE II ORK OVERTIHE OH A PROJECT IIHEtt HE lIA S
IIOT THE OWE IIHO HAD BEEt) llORKItlG 0 H IT ALL HEEK.
A GRIEVAtlCE FILED Otl THIS SUBJECT IIAS DENIED.
(tlAHES/DE TAILS KHOllW TO QTC)
MAIIAGEt1EtIT ItlFORt1ED CRAFTS THAT WO 0 HE HOULD BE LOANED TO ANOTHER CREH F
OR OVERTIIIEp YET Tll0 IIEEKS LATER DID JUST THAT.
EllPLOYEE HAD REQUESTED OVERTIHE AtlD HHEtl HIS SKILL llAS tlEED ED ANOTHER PERSON IIAS LOAtlfD.
A GRI EVAtlCE IIAS FILED AtlD DENIED OW SITE.
(WANES/DETAILS KtlOIIW TO QTC)
COIICERtlS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY HUHBER.
1
~r,
=.F ERE tlC ECP S1 32 J -ECP S132C
'EQUEWCY REQUEST IP ISSS RllN
'EGORY:
tlP tlGT.
8 PERS.
ISSUES TEHtlESSEE LEY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF.
HUCLEAR POllER EHPLOYEE COHCERtl PROGRAM SYSTEH (ECPS)
EMPLOYEE COtlCERH IHFORHATIOH BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY-70<)
OVERTIHE HOT GIVEtl OUT Otl AH EQUAL BASIS PA 7
~ RUtl TItlE 10:04:39 RUW DATE " 03/'10i87 S
lt SUB R PLT
- OtlCERtl WUMBER CAT CAT D LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2 SAF RELATED BF BL SQ ttB HISTORICAL COWCERtl REPORT ORIGIH COHCERW DESCRIPTIOH REF.
SECTIOtl CAT HP SUBCAT " 706 I 612-00101 tlP 70601 W llBtl T50058 1 tl tl H
tl 2
HA WA HA tN Itl-85-612-001 QTC OVERTIHE WOT EVEtlLY DISTRIBUTED Atl0tl G CREllS.
thAttAGEHEttT CHOOSES FAVORIT E PEOPLE TO HORK OVERTIHE.
I -85 773 00101 HP 70608 H llBtl.
1 tl W
H H
T50081 2
HA t3A tlA tlA l 909-00101 t'1P 70608 S l'lBtl 1
tl W
H H
T50092 2 tN tlA tlA ttA 02 tlP 70609 S llBH 1
H tl tl tl 2 tlA HA tlA tlA I 917-00301 tlP 70009 W HBIl 1
H W
tl tl T5009ii 2 tlA tlA HA tlA QTC QTC QTC C/I llAS TOLD THAT IF HE DID HOT WORK OVERTIHE Otl SATURDAYS'E HOULD BE TRAtlSFERRED TO AtlOTHER CREtti HOWEVER tlhtNGEtlEtlT DID tlOT EtlFORCE THIS ST ATEHEtlT.
(tlAtlES KttOlhtt TO QTC At<D RE LEASE OF IttFORtlATIOtt llOULD JEOPARDIZ E CrI>S COHFIDEtlTIALITY.)
WO tlORE I tlFORHATIOtl AVAILABLE.
LACK OF PERSOtltlEL TO ADEQUATELY COVE R 3p 8
HR.
SHIFTS IlITHOUT HAVItlG A H
IGH RATE OF 0/T StlIFTS.
ItlDIVIDUALS ARE FORCED TO HORK AW ADDITIOHAL SH IFT llITHOUT REGARD FOR It/DIVIDUAL PH YSICAL OR thEttTAL llELL BEItlG.
THIS I S
FORCED 0/T BECAUSE OF THE IMPLIED THREAT OF A HARttIttG LETTER IH THE EH PLOYEES PHR OR FIELD FILE.
TINE OFF llITHOUT PAY OR TERtlItlATIOtl IF REPEA TED.
WO FOLLOH UP REQUIPED.
llo ADD ITIOHAL IHFORttATIOW AVAILABLE.
AWHUAL Et)PLOYEES ARE "FORCED" TO l'10R K OVERTItlE (SOHETItlES 3 t10tlTHS OF 7
DAYS, 12 HOURS).
tlUCH OF THIS OVERT ItlE IS tlOT tlECESSARYp AWD DOES tlOT A
PPRECIABLY IWCREASE PRODUCTIOW DUE T 0
DECREASED EHPLOYEE EFFECTIVEtlESS.
THIS ALSO CREATES A
PERSOWWEL SAFET Y PROBLENp AS EHPLOYEES ARE NORE ACC IDEWT PROtlE llHEH EXCHAUSTED FROtl OVE RTIHE.
TVA DOES tlOT GET THEIR HotlEY
'S llORTH OUT OF EttPLOYEES IH THIS SI TUATIOH.
tlO FURTHER DETAILS AVAILAB Lf.
WO FOLLOW UP REQUIRED.
COWCERWS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY HUHBER.
kC>>
4I s~
.4 t~
-'.FEREIICE ECPS132 J-ECPS132C
'.EQUEWCY REQUEST IP - ISSS -
RHN EGORY:
NP t1GT.
8 PERS.
ISSUES TENtlESSEE LEY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF tlUCLEAR POllER ENPLOYEE COWCERtl PROGRAN SYSTEN (ECPS)
EMPLOYEE CONCERN IWFORNATIOtl BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY< 70it ENPLOYEES REQUIRED TO HORK EXCESSIVE OVERTINE PAG 8
RUII TINE - 10: 04: 39 RUII DATE - 03/10/87 S
H SUB R PLT
- OtlCERW NUNBER CAT CAT D LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2
SAF RELATED BF BL SQ HB HISTORICAL COWCERtl REPORT ORIGItl COtlCERtl DESCRIPT ION REF.
SECTIOtl CAT NP SUBCAT 706 I 938-00801 NP 7 0<i 07 tl HBtl T50251 1
W tl tl W
2 tlA tlA WA NA QTC TVA OVERTIt1E POLICY (DEPARTtIEtlT. KNOH tl) IS "A NESS" AtlDp DESPITE REGULATO RY RESTRICTIOtlSp REQUIRES ENPLOYEES TO HORK EXTEtlSIVE OVERTItIE.
tlO FORT HER ItlFORNATIOtl It( FILE.
NUCLEAR PO HER DEPARTNEtlT CONCERN.
I 969-00101 T50103 I 9<<9-00201 T50103 I 959-00101 T50100 NP 70h0<i W HBN 1
W II tl tl Itt-85-909-001 2
NA tlA tlA tlA NP 70601 W
HBW 1
W W
tl tl Itl-85-969-002 2
WA WA tlA tlA tIP 70606 tl HBtl 1 tl tl W
W IN-85-959-001 2
WA tlA WA tlA QTC QTC QTC CI'S SECURITY CLEARAtlCE HAS PULLED H HEtl CI I'IAS TRAtlSFERRED.
SUBSEQUEtlTL Yp CI HAS LOST THE OPPORTUtlITY TO IIO RK OVERTINE.
DETAILS KIIOHtt TO QTCp HITHELD DUE TO COtlFIDEtlIALITY. CI H
AS tlO FURTHER INFORMATION.
tlO FOLLO
'H UP REQUIRED.
OVERTINE IS tlOT BEING DISTRIBUTED EQ UALLY.
SANE EtiPLOYEES IW THE SAtIE C REH HAVE CONSIDERABLY thORE OVERTINE THAt) OTHERS.
CI HAS WO ADDITIOtlAL I IIFORI<ATIOII.
tlO FOLLOH UP REQUIRED.
OVERTINE FOR TRUCKDRIVERS IS tlOT DIV IDED EQUALLY.
A SHALL tlUNBER OF DRI VERS ARE CLEARED FOR THE PROTECTED A
REA AtlD RECEIVE ALL THE HEEKEtlD OVER TINE THAT REQUIRES ACCESS.
CI FEELS ALL DRIVERS SHOULD BE CLEARED AtlD T HE AVAILABLEOVERTINE DIVIDED EQUALL Y.
CI HAS tlO ADDITIOtlAL IWFORNATIOW WO FOLLOW UP REQUIRED.
I -85"970" 00201 I'IP 70607 N HBtl 1 tl W
tl tl T50112 2 tlA WA tlA tlA
'I 989"00401 IPP 70601 tl HBN 1
tl tl tl N
T50106 2
WA WA WA WA QTC QTC DEPARTNEtlT (KIIOHtl) FORCES CERTAItlI P ERSOtltlEL TO HORK OVERTINEp HHEW OTHE R PERSONNEL IW THE DEPARTNEWT HOULD LIKE TO HORK OVERTINE BUT ARE WOT AL LOIIED TO.
CI HAS tlO FURTHER IWFORNA TIOII.
tlO FOLLOH UP REQUIRED.
OVERTINE SITUATIOtl Itl DEPARTNEtlT (Ktl OHW) IS HURTIIIG t10RALE.
CI HAS tlO F
URTHER ItlFORt1ATIOII.
tl0 FOLLOH UP RE QUIRED.
COWCERtlS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY WUNBER.
4g k,p
'L~
1t'
- FEREWC ECPS132J-ECPS132C
'EQUEtlCY
" REQUEST IP ISSS RI]II EGORY:
t1P tlGT. 8 PERS.
ISSUES TEtlHESSEE LEY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF NUCLEAR POllER EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAt1 SYSTEM (ECPS)
EMPLOYEE CONCERN INFORMATION BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY'06 OVERTIME tlOT DIVIDED EQUALLY AIPOIIG ALL SHIFTS PA 9
RUtl TItlE - 10'.06:39 RUH DATE 03/10/87 S
H SUB R PLT
- OIICERI< NUMBER CAT CAT D LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2 SAF RELATED BF BL SQ IIB HISTORICAL CONCERN REPORT ORIGIN CONCERN DESCRIPTIOW REF.
SECTIOII CAT MP SUBCAT 706 I 130-00101 MP 70602 H IIBW T50122 1
H tl tl tl 2
WA IIA HA WA QTC EMPLOYEES ARE tlOT TREATED EQUAL IW R
EGARD TO THE DISTRIBUTIOtl OF OVERTIM E.
UPPER LEVEL COtlST.
tlAtlAGEMEtlT SH OI'IS FAVORITISt1 TO THE 1ST SHIFT.
EM PLOYEES THPEATEWED 1<1TH A QUOTA OF II ORK TO BE DOtlE EACH MEEK.
tl0 FURTHE R INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
COWSTRUCTI Otl COtlCERN.
I 132-00201 T50122 t1P 70601 W IIBH 1
W W
tl t1 It)-86-132-002 2
HA WA tlA tlA QTC TVA TAKES CREHS OFF OF ASSIGtlED IIORK TO GIVE "BUDDIES" OVERTIME.
COtlSTR UCTIOW CONCERN.
CI HAS WO ADDITIONA L INFORMATION.
I "86-1<)6-00301 T50235 MP 70001 W IIBII 1
tl tl H
H 2
HA HA HA tlA It)-86-166-005 QTC OVERTIME IS tlOT DISTRIBUTED FAIRLY A MOtlG THE CRAFT.
COtISTRUCTIOH DEPART t1EWT COtlCERII.
CI HAS tIO FURTHER ItlF ORtlATIOH.
IIO FOLLOH UP REQUIRED.
I 156-00301 MP 70002 tl IIBW 1 tl tl tl W
T50129 2 tlA WA tlA ttA QTC DISCRII1IHATIOH: OVERTII1E IS WOT GIVE H TO 3RD SHIFT AS FREQUENTLY AS IT I S
FOR 1ST SHIFT.
FIRST SHIFT HAS AB OUT 100 PEOPLE OH OVERTIME.
THIRD S HIFT HAS ABOUT 60 PEOPLE HORKItlG OVE RTItlE.
3RD SHIFT "OVERTIIIE" HAtlGERS IIERE TRAtlSFERRED TO 1ST SHIFT.
COW STRUCTIOtl DEPT COtlCERtl.
CI HAS HO A
DDITIOWAL IWFORtlATIOtl.
I 159-00201 T502CI9 I 163"00101 T5 0129 t1P 70601 tl IIBH 1
tl tl H
tl 2
HA HA WA HA t1P 70602 tl HBH 1 tl H
tl tl 2
HA HA IIA tlA IW-86-159-002 IH"86-163-001 QTC QTC OVERTIME IS HOT DISTRIBUTED EVENLY.
THE FRIEtlDS OF A SUPERVISOR (tlAME K HOHW) ALHAYS SEEM TO GET A DISPROPOR TIOIIATE AMOUIIT.
COHSTRUCTIOtl DEPART MEtlT COtlCERII.
WO ADDITIOIIAL IWFOPt1A TIOtl AVAILABLE IW FILE.
WO FOLLOII U P REQUIRED.
"PRIORITY" IIORK HAS BEEtl TAKEII FROt1 THE 3RD SHIFT OVERTItlE.
CI DOES tIOT FEEL THAT THIS IS PROPER.
COHSTRUC TIOtl DEPT COtlCERII.
CI HAS HO ADDITI OtlAL ItlFORMATIOtl.
CONCERNS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY tIUIPBER.
$"i 4g vr Ago
- FEREWC ECP5132J-Ecpsi32C
!EQUEtlCY REQUEST IP - ISSS -'Htl
'EGORYi HP IIGT ~
8 PERS.
ISSUES TEHtlESSEE LEY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF tlUCLEAR POllER EtlPLOYEE COtlCERH PROGRAH SYSTEH (ECPS)
EtlPLOYEE COtlCERtl IIIFORHATIOH BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORYi 70<i OVERTItlE HOT DIVIDED EQUALLY AHOIIG ALL SHIFTS PA 10 RUII TINE 10:0<i:39 RUW DATE 03/10/87 S
H SUB R PLT
- OIICERN WUIIBER CAT CAT D
LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2 SAF RELATED BF BL SQ 13B HISTORICAL CONCERN REPORT ORIGIN CONCERN DESCRIPTIOH REF.
SECTION CAT
- IIP SUBCAT 70CI I "86-170-00001 HP 70602 tl IIBH T502c45 1
tl tl tl tl 2
HA WA IN WA QTC OVERTIHE IS tlOT EQUALLY DIVIDED AtlOII G ALL SHIFTS.
OVERTIHE IS BEING SCH EDULED (HAIIAGEIIEIITKtl01'ltl) FOR HOT SY STEtl HAtlGERS THAT HAVE HAD tl0 HOURS LOGGED AGAINST THEN FOR THE PREVIOUS DAY HHICH IS AGAINST POLICY.
COIIST RUCTIOtl COHCERtl.
WO ADDITIOIIAL ItlFO RIPATIOW AVAILABLE.
I 209-00801 tlP 70007 tl IIBN 1
N tl tl tl T50218 2 tlh HA HA tN I 302-00601 HP 70001 H IIBH 1
tl tl tl tl T50161 2 tlA WA WA WA
) -85"002-00101 IPP 70<i07 tl HBII 1
H tl tl tl T5008ii 2
WA WA WA WA QTC QTC QTC TVA LACKS COtlCERtl FOR EtlPLOYEE'S NOR ALE Itl THAT THEY ARE FORCED TO IIORK OVERTIIPE FOR HOtlTHS Otl 12 HR.
SHIFTp 7
DAYS A IIEEKp AtlD SHOULD Atl EtlPLOY EE IIEED SOHE TINE OFF FOR PEPSOINL R
EASOtlSp IIAIIAGEtIEIITCOULD CARE LESS.
THE EIIPLOYEE DOES HOT HAVE A CHOICE It) ADDITIOWp TVA'S TRAVEL POLICY FOR REIthBURSEHEIIT IS WOT FAIRLY APPL IED.
IT IS OPEN FOR ItlTERPRETATIOtl BY EACH TRAVEL tlAtlAGER AT EACH FACIL ITYp AHD EACH ORGAtlIZATIOW THE TVA TRAVEL POLICY IS WOT EXPLAIIIED TO T HE EHPLOYEE PRIOR TO TRAVELIWG.
OVERTItlE IS WOT DIVIDED UP EQUALLY A 110HG CREHS.
HO SPECIFICS KWOIIH.
CO WSTRUCTIOH CONCERN.
CI HAS IIO ADDIT IOtNL IWFORtlATIOtl.
tl0 FOLLONUP. REQU
- IRED, KIHGSTOtl STEAN PLAIIT - AS PLAtlT OPER ATORp CI (IIAHE KWOHtl) HAD TO HORK EX CESSIVE OVERTIIIE. Itl SOtlE CASES THIS HAS IIORE THAW 16 HOURS STRAIGHT.
HO RELIEF PERSOIIWEL AVAILABLETO RELIE VE OPERATOR IIHO BECAHE ILLp BEGAtl TO EXPERIENCE JOB STRESSp OR NHO tlEEDE D TO LEAVE JOB FOR URGEtlT PERSOtlAL R
EASOHS.
COtlCERtlS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY tIUIPBER.
E f
r.~
Jj 4V ly
'.FEREWCE ECPS132J-ECPS132C
'.EQUEtICY REQUEST IP ISSS Rl lt1 EGORY:
fIP NGT.
& PERS.
ISSUES TEHtlESSEE LEY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF tlUCLEAR POINTER EHPLOYEE CONCERN PPOGRAt1 SYSTEM (ECPS)
EHPLOYEE CONCERN IHFORMATIOtl BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY'06 EXCESSIVE OT AFFECTS HORK QUALITY & EHPL.
HEALTH PA ll RUtl TItlE 10:06:39 RUtl DATE 03/10/87 S
H SUB R PLT
- OtlCERII IIUHBER CAT CAT D
LOC 1
RE!"ORT APPL 2 SAF RELATED BF BL SQ IIB HISTORICAL COHCERtl REPORT ORIGIN CONCERN DESCRIPTIOW REF.
SECTIOtl
~
CAT
- HP SUBCAT 700 I 003-00101 NP 70609 N IIBII T50256 1 tl tl tl W
2 WA WA tN tlA QTC CI IS COtlCERtlED OVER THE EFFICIEtlCY LEVEL OF IIORKERS AT VARIOUS TVA WUCL EAR PLAtlTS AFTER IIORKItlG EXCESSIVE 0
,VERTIHE IIITHOUT A BREAK.
WO FURTHER IWFORMATIOII IH THE FILE.
IIO FOLLOH-UP REQUIRED.
I 003-00601 HP 70001
.N HBH 1
W N
W tl T50172 2
NA tlA HA tlA IP-86-013-00201 HP 70601 N
SQW 1 tl H
tl tl T50277 2 tlA tlA tIA tIA Itl-85-002-00101 HP 70001 H HBII 1 tl tl W
tl T502<i2 2 tIA HA tlA tlA II1-85-002-00201 tlP 70408 H HBtI 1
H W
tl tl T50262 2 tlA IIA tIA WA QTC QTC QTC QTC TVA DID tlOT DIVIDE CRAFT OVERTIt1E EQ UALLY.
THE PERSOtltlEL IIHO HAD BEEt)
A T IIBtlP THE LOtlGEST AHD HAD DOtlE THE HOST HORK RECEIVED THE LEAST AHOUWT OF OVERTIHE.
CI HAS tl0 FURTHER IIIFO RtlATIOH.
WO FOLLOH UP REQUIRED.
OVERTIHE AHOIIG CRAFT IS HOT DISTRIBU TED FAIRLY.
tlUCLEAR POllER COtlCERW.
CI HAS tl0 FURTHER IIIFORIIATIOII.
tl0 FOL LOIIUP IWFORHAT ION.
OVERTIHE IS tIOT DIVIDED EQUALLY AHOII G CRAFT.
CI HAS tlO FURTHER IIIFORHAT IOW.
AH EHPLOYEE IIAS "BADGERED" AFTER QUE STIOWIWG HOH OVERTIHE HAS DIVIDED IH THE CREII.
HAHE KIIOIltl TO QTC.
IIITH HELD DUE TO COIIFIDEtlTIALITY. CI HAS WO FURTHER IHFORHATIOH.
3II-02<!7 01 IIP 70<!10 H l<BtI 1
I)
H H
tl 2 IIA tN tN HA OECP CI IS BEItlG CHARGED IIITH OVERTIIIE (U tlEXPECTED) IIHEII CI ACCEPTED TO HORK BUT HAD HO TRAtlSPORTATIOtl HOIPE.
PLE ASE EXPLAItl HOH A-VIE2 A!ID A-VIH PER TAIWS TO CI.
3f'-85-001-00201 NP 70001 tl kIBtt 1
tl H
H tl T50221 2
WA tN tN tlA QTC IT IS COMIIOW KWOHLEDGE THAT A CERTAI H CLIQUE OF PEOPLE GET THE t'IAJORITY AWD CHOICE OF OVERTIHE.
THE CI HAD BEEN TURNED DOHII OH OVERTI[IE FOR OWE YEAR.
(WAIPE AtlD DETAILS OF THIS CA SE ARE KHOlltl TO QTC AtlD ARE IIITHHELD TO IIAIIITAIHCONFIDENTIALITY.)
COWS TRUCTIOH DEPT.
CONCERN.
CI HAS HO F
URTHER IWFORNATIOW.
COIICERNS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY HUHBER.
Ii
'I If PI
EF EREWC ECP S132 J-ECPS132C
,EQUEtlCY REQUEST
'lP ISSS RMM t'EGORY<
t1P MGT.
8 PERS.
ISSUES T EWtlESS E L EY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF tlUCLEAR POI1ER EMPLOYEE COtlCERtl PROGRAtl SYSTEM (ECPS)
EtlPLOYEE COtlCERtl ItlFORHATIOtl BY CATEGORY/SUBCATEGORY SUBCATEGORY<
70'>
OVERTIME NOT GIVEtl OUT ON At< EQUAL BASIS PA 12 RUW TIME 10:OCI:39 RUtl DATE " 03/10/87 S
H SUB R PLT COtlCERW WUtlBER CAT CAT D LOC 1
REPORT APPL 2
SAF RELATED BF BL SQ llB HISTORICAL COtlCERtl REPORT ORIGIN CONCERN DESCRIPTIOW REF.
SECTION CAT t1P SUBCAT 70%
GP-85-021-00101 MP 70601 tl ISBN T50233 1
t>
tl W
W 2 tlA WA NA IlA QTC CI IS CONCERNED THAT TVA EHPLOYEESi llHO HAVE TRAtlSFERRED FROt1 COtlSTRUCTI Otf TO THE NUCLEAR POttERp ARE ALLOllED TO RETURN TO THE COtlSTRUCTIOW GROUP TO llORK OVERTItlE.
DETAILS KtlOHW TO QTCp llITHHELD DUE TO COtlFIDEtlTIALIT Y.
tl0 FURTHER ItlFORt1ATIOH tlAY BE RE LEASED.
COtlSTRUCTIOtl DEPARTtlEtlT COtl CERN.
CI HAS tl0 FURTHER ItlFORtlATIOtl tlO FOLLOW UP REQUIRED.
( 019-00201 MP 70601 tf t<Btt 1
W W
tl W
T50050 2
WA WA NA WA 61 COWCERtlS FOR CATEGORY l1P SUBCATEGORY 706 QTC SUPERVISOR (t/AME Kt<0lttt) "SHAPPItlG" I WDIVIDUALS FROtl OtlE CREll TO AtlOTHER TO KEEP "BUDDIES" It) PREFERRED POSIT IOWS AND OW JOBS HITH OVERTIME JUST TO SHOll "llHO' BOSS".
COWCERtlS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY NUMBER.
't il
ATTACHMENT B OVERTIME List of Concerns by Element/Issue The Overtime Subcategory (70400) is comprised of 61 concerns broken into three major elements and 13 issues.
Schedulin and Distributin Overtime 70401 Over time not given out on an equal basis EX-85-105-005 EX-85-108-006 EX-85-129-003 EX-85-154-004 IN-85-172-002 IN-85-331-001 XN-85-370-002 IN-85-490-003 IN-85-612-001 XN-85-949-002 IN-85-989-004 IN-86-132-002 IN-86-146-003 IN-86-159-002 IN-86-302-004 OW-85-003-004 SQP-86-013-002 WBN-85-002-001 WBP-85-001-002 WBP-85-021-001 WI-85-019-002 70402 - Overtime not divided equally among all shifts IN-85-480-002 IN-86-130-001 IN-86-156-003 IN-86-163-001 IN-86-170-004 70403 Insufficient support crafts scheduled for overtime IN-85-292-002 IN-85-316-009 Page 1 of 3
I 0
ATTACHMENT B (continued) 70404 - Overtime lost to workers without security clearances IN-85-949-001 70405 - NSB works all the overtime IN-8S-'16-004 70406 Overtime not divided equally among truck drivers IN-85-959-001 Mandator Use of Overtime 70407 - Employees required to work excessive overtime IN-85-147-002 IN-85-492-007 IN-85-938-008 IN-85-970-002 IN-86-209-008 00-85-002-001 70408 - Employees threatened with termination for refusing overtime IN-85-061-001 IN-85-116-001 IN-85-139-001 IN-85-157-001 IN-85-180-003 IN-85-181-007 IN-85-182-001 IN-85-186-007" IN-85-256-001 IN-85-492-002 IN-85-773-001 IN-85-909-001-VBN-5-002-002 70409 - Excessive overtime affecting, quality of work, and health of employees IN-85-034-001 IN-85-184-001 IN-85-186-007" IN-85-909-001""
IN-8S-917-003 00-85-003-001 Page 2 of 3
a
ATTACHMENT B (continued) 70410 - Inadequate notice of overtime IN-85-159-003 IN-85-440-002 WBN-0247 Miscellaneous 70411 Define emergency overtime I-86-237-SQN 70412 - Teamsters working overtime without supervision IN-85-371-001 70413 - Concerns with insufficient information to evaluate The following two concerns were reviewed but, because of a lack of clarity in expression, could not be investigated further.
IN-85-540-003 IN-85-540-004
=Concern addresses more than one issue Page 3 of 3
J,
~,~
'I U