ML18024B113

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Revised Page 3 of IE Insp Repts 50-259/79-28, 50-260/79-28 & 50-296/79-28
ML18024B113
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  
Issue date: 10/12/1979
From: Robert Lewis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Parris H
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Shared Package
ML18024B114 List:
References
NUDOCS 7911270077
Download: ML18024B113 (4)


See also: IR 05000259/1979028

Text

1,WR RE0~+

Cy

0

n

DQt

~+~

~o

++*++

In Reply Refer To:

RII:DSP

50-259/79-28

.50-260/79-28

50-296/79-28

UNITEDSTATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100

ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303

OCT 1 g gyp

Tennessee

Valley Authority

Attn:

H. G. Parris

Manager of Power

500A Chestnut Street

Tower II

Chattanooga,

TN

37401

Gentlemen:

Concerning our letter of October 9,

1979 which enclosed

NRC Region II

inspection report nos.

50-259/79-28,

50-260/79-28

and 50-296/79-28.

Please substitute

the enclosed inspection report page

3 for the one

which was included in the report sent to you.

Paragraph

8 of this

report was inadvertently omitted.

Sincerely,

E.c.

R.

C.

ewis, Acting Chief

Reactor Operations

and

Nuclear

Support Branch

cc:

H. L. Abercrombie

Plant Superintendent

Post Office Box 2000

Decatur,

Alabama

35602

D. E. McCloud

Project Engineer

400 Chestnut Street

Tower II

Chattanooga,

Tennessee

37401

l ~

J. F.

Cox

400 Commerce Street

W10C131 C-K

Knoxville, Tennessee

37902

E.

G. Beasley

Tennessee

Valley Authority

309 Grant's Building

Knoxville, Tennessee

37902

0

/,

OCl l g pe

During this period of thee reactor'ressure

was controlled by the main

steam safety/refief valves,

and vessel, level by the High Pressuxe

Coolant

Infection and Reactor

Core Isolation Cooling

(RCXC) systems.

During a visual'inspection

by the licensee'f

the

RCXC turbine, water was

observed issuing from the turbine shaft steam seals

and the governor valve

leakoff line.

The turbine was secured

and the problem investigated.

It

was determined that water had backed

up from the barometric

condenser into

the steam seal

and valve leakoff lines and had entered

the RCIC oil system.

The water back up was caused

by a problem with the barometric'condensex

condensate

pump ~hose breaker

was found in the tripped position.

In

addition,

a stop check valve (71-32) on, the discharge of the barometric

condenser

vacuum pump had failed to open, preventing the pump from drawing

a vacuum on the condenser.

The oil system was drained

and refilled and the RCIC system tested satis-

factorily with no recurrence

of the problems.

The licensee is still

investigating the cause of the condensate

pump breaker trip.

Opexating

personnel

are being cautioned to test stop check valves which have been

manually shut and then opened to insure they are not stuck on their shut

seat.

The inapectoz witnessed

the startup of the Unit 3 reactor

on September

17,

1979.

This included approach

to criticality, criticality, and power

increase

to the heating range.

The inspector did not identify any safety

concerns of the startup.

No items of noncompliance

or deviations were identified.

Licensee

Event

Re orts

On July 31;

1979,

a failed Unit

1 smoke detector

(XS-39-106PC)

was

discovered

by licensee personnel.

It was replaced

and tested satisfactorily.

Technical Specification (TS) 3.11.C.1 states

that all smoke detectors

must

be operational except that one may be inoperable for,no greater

than 30

days.

T. S. 6.7.b.(2) requires that operation in a degraded

mode be the

.

subject,of

a thirty-day written report from the licensee to the NRC.

No

thirty-day report was submitted by the licensee

and this act was questioned

by the inspector,'he

licensee

contended

that one smoke detector which

was failed for no greater

than 30 days did not violate the operability

criteria of T. S. 3.11.C.1 stated

above.

Unresolved Item:

This matter of failure to submit

a thixty-day written

report concerning

an inoperable

smoke detector is considered

an unxesolved

i'tern pending followup, by the inspector, of the xepoxtability requirements

of this item,