ML18018A475
| ML18018A475 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 03/21/1983 |
| From: | Zimmerman S CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| LAP-83-72, NUDOCS 8303280040 | |
| Download: ML18018A475 (15) | |
Text
g+0l REGULATOR NFORMATION D I STRI BUTION TEM
('R IDS) r
~
AOCESSION NBR ~ 8303280040 DOC ~ DATE ~ 83/03/21 NOTARIZED NO FAGIL:50 400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant~ Unit lg.Carolina
'50>>401 Shearon Har r is.Nuclear Powe>
Pl=ant~
Uni t 2~
Car ol ina AUTH ~ NAME AUTHOR AFF ILIATION ZIMt~ERMAN~S,RE Carolina Power 8 Light Co.
=REC IP, NAME REC IPIENl'FFILIATION DENTONtH ~ RE Office of Nuclear Reactor Regul-ationi Director
SUBJECT:
Forwards revised environ rept Tables 3.3 1
K 3 ' '"2i P
3 '
2~table of waste discharge rates;,to cooling ]tower blowdowniin response to NRC request, DOCKET 05000400 05000401 DISTRIBUTION CODE: >C001S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
~J ENCL g SIZE:..
TITLE: Licensing Submittal:
Envir onmental Rept*Amdt 8 Related Correspondence NOTES:
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR LB3 BC 18 KADAMBIgP 04 INTERNALS ELD/HDS1
.NRR/DE/EEB 06 NRR/DE/SAB 07 NRR/DSI/RAB 09 RGN2 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
,1 1
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR LB3 LA 19 NRR/DE/AEAB 08 NRR/DE/EHEB NR ETB
~ILK
'COPIES LT)TR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 EXTERNAL: ACRS NRC PDR NTIS 20 02 6
6 1
1 1
LPDR NSIC 03 05
.TOTAL NUMBER.OF COPIES REQUIRED LTTR 22 ENCL 21
~
I
~
~
e I
0 CO)QE, Carolina Power & Light Company MAR 2l 1983 SERIAL:
LAP-83-72 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NOS ~
1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-400 AND 50-401 CLARIFICATIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
Dear Mr. Denton:
In response to a request from your Mr. Prasad Kadambi, Carolina Power tg Light Company (CP&L) hereby transmits one original and forty copies of the following information:
aO b.
Co d ~
Revised Environmental Report Tables Table 3.3-1 Water Use Under Various Station Conditions Table 3.6.2-2 Summary of Chemical Waste Compliance with Applicable Standards/Per Unit Revised Environmental Report Page 3.6-2 Table of Waste Discharge Rates to Cooling Tower Blowdown Description of chlorination of the Circulating and Service Water Sys tems Items a.
and b. above will be incorporated into a future amendment of the Environmental Report.
Please contact my staff if you have any questions.
Yours very truly, JDK/kjr (6434 JDK)
S.
R.
mmerman Manager Licensing 5 Permits CC1 Mr. N. Prasad Kadambi (NRC)
Mr. G. F. Maxwell (NRC-SHNPP)
Mr. J.
P. O'Reilly (NRC-RII)
Mr. Travis Payne (KUDZU)
Mr. Daniel F. Read (CHANGE/ELP)
Chapel Hill Public Library Wake County Public Library Mr. Wells Eddleman Dr. Phyllis Lotchin Ms. Patricia T. Newman Mr. John D. Runkle Dr. Richard D. Wilson Mz.
G. 0.'rfght (ABLB) il01 Dr. J.
H. Carpenter (ASLB)
Mr. J. L. Kelley (ASLB)
)8303280040 83032i'DR ADQCK 05000400 C
- PDR, 411 Fayetteville Street G P. O. Box 1551 e Raleigh, N. C. 27602
ri, I
h U
Revised Environmental Report Tables Table 3.3-1 Water Use Under Various Station Conditions Table 3.6.2-2 Summary of Chemical Waste Compliance with Applicable Standards/Per Unit
~
~
TABLE 3.3-1 SHNPP STATION WATER USE UNDER VARIOUS STATION CONDITIONS STREAM**
1 2c 3c 4c 5c 6c 7c 8c 9
10c 11 12c 13c 14c 15c 16c 17c 18c 19c 20 21 22 23c 24c 25 26c 27 28 29 30 FLOW* 8 MAX POWER OPERATION 21,000 gpm 464 MGM 827 MGM 827 MGM 377 MGM 483,000 gpm 483,000 gpm 300 gpm 20,800 300 gpm 208,300 30,300 gpm 30,287 gpm 315,900 gpm 315,900 gpm 30,000 gpm 30,000 gpm 50,000 gpm 891,600 208,300 16,700 666,600 2.5 MGH 2.5 MGM 62,500 2,203,800 666,600 666,600 330 lbs./month 1 '
MGM FLO& 8 MIN ANTICIPATED POWER OPERATION 21,000 gpm 58 MGH 105 HGM 105 MGM 47 MGM 284,000 gpm 284,000 gpm 176 gpm 10,000 176 gpm 122,530 17,826 gpm 17,815 gpm 185,800 gpm
~185,800 gpm 17,650 gpm 17,650 gpm 50,000 gpm 891,600 208,300 16,700 666,600 2.5 MGH 2.5 MGM 36,765 2,203,800 666,600 666,600 330 lbs./month lo5 MGM FLOW* 8 TEMPo SnUTDOWN 21,000 gpm 5
MGM 9
MGM 9
HGM 4
MGM 0-284,000 gpm 0-284,000 gpm 0-176 gpm 0-10,000 0-176 gpm 0-122,530 0-17,826 gpm 0-17,815 gpm 0-185,800 gpm 0-185,800 gpm 0-17,650 gpm 0-17,650 gpm 50,000 gpm 891,600 208,300 16,700 666,600 2.5 HGH 2.5 MGH 0-36,765 2,203,800 666,600 666,600 330 lbs./month 1 '
MGH COHPONENT Emergency Only Varies with dissolved solids Hax flow 26,000 gpm Max flow 26,000 gpm Average meteorological conditions Intermittent operation Condensate Polisher regenerations and rinse (intermittent operation)
(Depending on 89 and 811 (t 20& 21622)
Wet sludge 0'
TABLE 3'.2-2
SUMMARY
OF CHEMICAL WASTE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS/PER UNIT (Sheet 1 of 2)
Waste Source Quantity Chemical 6 Pollutent
~t. /
Content Estimated Average Concentration After Treatment
(
m)
Estimated Increase in EPA Effluent Average Con-Limitations centration of (40CFR423)
Water State of North Carolina Mater ualit Standards Boron Recycle System 685,000 Boron(b) 10 0.5 No standards Waste Management 437,000 Detergent, Dirt
- Laundry, Showers 680,000 Detergent, Dirt Condenser Feedwater 1,000,000 Hydrazine(b)
Equipment Drains Ammonia(b)
Floor Drains 1,500,000 Oil 6 Grease 30 30 0.05 0-1 15 TSS-Avg-30/
Max-100 TSS-Avg-30/
Max-100 06G: Avg-15/
Max-20 0'4 (f.)
(g)
(g)
(e)
(e)
No numerical criteria
)
No numerical criterig (e)
Total Suspended Solids 30 TSS: Avg-30/
Max-100 (e)
Demineralized Water System 10,500,000 Total Dissolved Solids(b) 3,318 Sulfates(b) 2,212 Ph 6-9 6-9 4.2 2.8 No change(c)
No numerical criteria No numerical criteria; 6 5-9.0
TABLE 3.6.2-2 (continued)
Waste Source Quantity Chemical 6 Pollutent
~t. I Content Estimated Average Concentration After Treatment
(
m)
EPA Effluent Limitations (40CFR423)
(
m)
Estimated Increase in Average Con-centration of Water
(
m)
State of North Carolina Water ualit Standards Primary Water Treatment Plant Flush Water 8,000,000 Suspended Solids 30 TSS-Avg-30/
Max-100 (f)
(e)
Sewage Treatment Plant Polyelectroly te(b) 4,500,000 Residual Chlorine BOD Total Suspended Solids 1-2(e) 0-0.5 30 30 Avg-30-Max-45 Avg-30-Max-100 Trace Trace Trace No numerical criteria (e)
(e)
(e)
Preoperational Flushing and Hydrostatic Testing 20,000,000 Hydrazine(b)
Total Suspended Solids Copper pHIron Not known 30 1.0 6"9 1 0 TSS-Avg-30/
Max-100 Avg-l.O/Max-1.0 6-9 Avg-1.0/Max-1.0 (d)
(f) 0 02 0.02 No numerical criteria (e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
Steam Generator Blowdown System Electromagnetic Filter Flush 31,700 Total Suspended Solids Copper Iron pH 30 1.0 1.0 6-9 30 Avg-l.O/Max-1.0 Avg-1.0/Max-1.0 6-9 (f) 0.02 0.02 (e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(a)
Cooling Tower Blowdown Flow is 50 MGD.
(b)
No EPA effluent limitations.
(c)
There will be no perceptible change in pH.
(d)
Not possible to predict.
(e)
Same as 40CFR423.
(f)
The sources of TSS have been combined and results stated with the Demineralized.Water System in Table 3.6.2-1.
quantity has no substantial effect on the total suspended solids in the cooling tower blowdown stream.
(g)
No perceptible change in average concentration.
This
b.
Revised Environmental Report Page 3.6-2
The Primary Filtered Makeup Water System provides required pretreatment.
This facility consists of two upflow filters, each have a capacity of 750 gpm.
Only one filter will normally be working at a time.
High modecular weight polyelectrolite is mixed into the water to induce adsorption so that microscopic particles are retained in the filter media.
The raw water may be continuously chlorinated to a combined chlorine concentration of 0.5 ppm to oxidize organic matter and inhibit biological growth on the filters.
Each filter is flushed as needed.
The filter flush water is decanted in a settling basin where the solids settle.
The supernatant water is discharged in a settling basin where the solids settle.
The supernatant water is discharged to the Main Reservoir.
The flush water contains suspended solids polyelectrolytes and residual chlorine.
The estimated concentrations in the wastewater, before mixing with the circulating cooling water, are indicated in Table 3.6.2-1.
The demineralized Water System consists of two carbon filters, two cation exchange units, one dagasifier, two anion exchange units',
and two mixed bed units.
These units constitute two independent trains, each of 300 gpm
- capacity, and each capable of meeting the normal daily requirements.
Additional information is contained in FSAR Section 9.2.3.
When the cation exchangers or the mixed bed units are exhausted, they are regenerated with solutions of sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide.
The mineral constituents in the Main Reservoir water which are removed by the ion exchange resins are released from the resins by washing them with the acid and hydroxide solutions.
The estimated concentration of total dissolved solids and sulfates in the regenerant waste will be up to 3,318 ppm and 2,212 ppm respectively.
The spent regeneration waste flows to the chemical waste treatment system for treatment and disposal, as shown in Figure 3.6.2-1.
The spent regeneration waste is intermittent and will average about 10,500,000 gal/yr.
3.6.2.2 Chemicals Released from Plant Corrosion Control Processes A number of chemicals are used for corrosion control in various plant systems, generally in small quantities under highly controlled conditions.
The following chemicals are used in various plant systems at SHNPP.
a.
Hydrazine Hydrazine is added to the condensate system to remove oxygen which causes corrosion problems.
the hydrazine concentraiton is maintained at 10 to 50 ppb which is sufficient to scavenge all the oxygen without over-feeding.
The end products of the reaction between oxygen and hydrazine are free nitrogen gas and water.
Hydrazine is also added to the Reactor Coolant System during start-up and to other closed cooling systems when oxygen removal is required.
b.
Ammonia Ammonia is used to maintain a pH of 8.2 to 9.2 in the steam generator and the condensate and feedwater system.
- Usually, a
concentration of about 450 ppb exists in the system.
c.
Lithium Hydroxide A small amount (0.2 to 1
ppm) of lithium hydroxide is used for pH adjustment in the Reactor Coolant System.
Lithium hydroxide is removed from the coolant through ion exchange.
When the ion exchange 3.6-2
c.
Table of Waste Discharge Rates to Cooling Tower Blowdown
Waste Source Boron Recycle Stream Waste Management Laundry Showers WASTE DISCHARGE RATES TO COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN Pum Source to Cooli Tower Blowdown 1.
Waste Monitor Tank Pump 2.
Settling Basin Sump Pump 1.
Waste Monitor Tank Pump 2.
Settling Basin Sump Pump 1.
Treated Laundry and Hot Shower Pump 2.
Settling Basin Sump Pump Pum Ca acit (6PM) l.
35 2.
500 1 ~
35 2-500 1 ~
100 2.
500 Condenser Feedwater Equipment Drains Floor Drains Demineralized Water System Primary Water Treatment Plant Flush System Sewage Treatment Plants Steam Generator EMF Flush l.
Yard oil separator pumps 2.
Secondary Waste Sample Tank Pump 3.
Settling Basin Sump Pump 1.
Waste Monitor Tank Pump 2.
Settling Basin Sump Pump 1.
Settling Basin Sump Pump 1.
Settling Basin Sump Pump 1.
Settling Basin Sump Pump 1.
Sewage Treatment Discharge Pump 1.
Secondary Waste Sample Tank Pump 2.
Settling Basin Sump Pump 1.
1200 2.
500 3
100 1.
35 2.
500 1.
500 1.
500 1
500 1.
70 1 ~
100 2.
500 53S6pd (6434JDK)
d.
Description of chlorination of the Circulating and Service Water Systems
Chlorination of the Circulating and Service Water Systems
~
The amount of chlorination will depend on the residual; therefore, the actual amount of chlorine may vary o
Ebasco uses a value of 241 lb/day/cooling tower ppm to determine Chlorine usage.
For expected normal concentration of 3 ppm:
(
/
)
)(
)(
)
/
cooling tower ppmJ o
Using values for maximum output of chlorination equipment, chlorine usage is approximately 1667 pounds per day.
o Service water chlorination would add one fifth the capacity of the circulating water system chlorine.
~
~
~
'1
'r
'1