ML18017B435
| ML18017B435 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 07/01/1981 |
| From: | Banks H CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017B434 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8108040307 | |
| Download: ML18017B435 (4) | |
Text
Carolina Power & Light Company USNRC BEG(Og "
AT), QIq7'gg Eoy((:)'~
July 1, 1981 Mr. James P. O'Reilly United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Mar ietta Street, Nor thwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
In reference to,your letter of June 15, 1981, referr ing to RII:
RW 50-400/
401/402/403/81-09, the attached is Carolina Power 5 Light Company's reply to the deficiencies identified in Appendix A. It is considered that the corrective and preventive actions taken will be satisfactory for resolution of this item.
To the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the corrective action in this report is true and complete.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Yours ver y truly, H. R. Banks Manager Corporate Quality Assurance NJC:jp Attachment cc:
Mr. J. A. Jones Mr. E. E. Utley Sworn to and Subscribed before me this
,'1st day of July, 1981.
Notary Pub ic My commission expires June 5, 1984.
8 108040307 810724 PDR ADOCK 05000400i,.
G PD~R
l ll w]
I
~
C'~
/
V 1
p I
l/Pp
~q r~>'
everity Level VI Violation Condition Reported:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II and the accepted QA program described in the PSAR Section 1.8.1 requir es that the QA Program shall provide for indoctrination and training of personnel performing activities affecting quality as necessary to assure that suitable proficiency is achieved and maintained.
CPEcL procedure CQA-1 Section 7.2 requires that personnel performing QA/QC activities be indoctrinated in these project information areas necessary for effective coordination and accomplishment of their assigned activities and responsibilities.
Contrary to the above, documentation examined revealed that two QA inspec-tors found certified in concrete placement were not maintaining their proficiency in that the latest revision to Work Procedure WP-05, "Concrete Placement" read by them was revision 16 whereas revision 18 was current.
Additionally, one inspector certified in concrete curing last read revision 4 to Work Procedure MP-17, "Concrete Curing" whereas revision 7 is currently in use.
Denial. or Admission and Reasons for Violation:
The violation identified by NRC audit was correct as stated.
There was an isolated breakdown in communication between the QA Specialist (Civil) and the clerk responsible for updating the required reading lists for the various QA.inspectors.
Corrective Steps Taken and Results Achieved:
When the violation was identified, a full review of the civil QA inspectors'ualification records was conducted.
It was found that the failure to update the reading list for MP-05, Revision 18 was an "across the board" oversight, but that the cases involving HP-05,'evision 17 and HP-17, Revisions 5,
6 h.7 were confined to those identified by the NRC inspector.
No other cases of QA inspector s failure to maintain their required reading lists current were found.
The QA inspectors in question were required to read the current re-visions of MP-05 and MP-17, respectively and their reading lists were updated accordingly.
Corrective Steps Taken to Avoid Further Noncompliance:
A required reading review system was developed by each discipline QA Specialist for certified QA inspectors.
A table was established with the various procedures that must be read as they relate to each QA inspectors'rea of certification.
A required reading log is maintained in each QA discipline and is being reviewed periodically to ensure that QA inspectors are keeping abreast with revisions to procedures affecting their area(s) of certification.
Date When Full Compliance Mill Be Achieved:
Full compliance is considered to have been achieved with implementation of the required reading review system on June 1, 1981.
7