ML18010A812

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 920822-0925.Violation Noted:Conditions Adverse to Quality Not Promptly Corrected
ML18010A812
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/01/1992
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18010A811 List:
References
50-400-92-17, NUDOCS 9210140143
Download: ML18010A812 (1)


Text

ENCLOSURE 1

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Shearon Harris Unit 1

Docket No. 50-400 License No. NPF-63 During an NRC inspection conducted on August 22 - September 25,

1992, a

violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

10.CFR Part 2,

Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 8, Criterion XVI, requires measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, and deviations, are promptly identified and.corrected.

Contrary to the above, conditions adverse to quality were not promptly corrected.

Improper diesel generator starting air quality was not corrected following issuance of Generic Letter 88-14 and initiation of

=Plant Change Request PCR 3995, dated November 14, 1988.

This problem contributed to an emergency diesel generator start failure on September 14, 1992.

This-is a Severity Level IV violation (supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U. S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control

Desk, Washington, D.

C.

20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Harris, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

This reply should be 'clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should =include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results

achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 1st day of October 1992 9210140143 921001 PDR ADOCK 05000400 8

PDR