ML18004B563
| ML18004B563 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris |
| Issue date: | 10/23/1986 |
| From: | Cutter A CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8610310299 | |
| Download: ML18004B563 (7) | |
Text
ACCESSION NBR
,~ FAC IL: 50-400 AUTH. NANE CUTTER, A. B.
RECIP. NANE DENTON> H. R.
RE('UL RY INFORNATION DISTR IBUT SYSTEN
( R IDS >.
8610310299 DOC. DATE: 86/10/23 NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET 0 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Planti Unit ii Carolina 05000400 AUTHOR AFFILIATION Carolina Power 8e Light Co.
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Director (p ost 851125
SUBJECT:
Forwards addi comment on Tech Specs re change of recirculation from 1> 500 gpm to li832 gpm Zc increase in differential pressure from 170 psi to 195 psi. Narked-up Tech Spec pag'e encl.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
B001D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: Licensing Submittal:
PSAR/FSAR *mdts Zc Related Correspondence NOTES: Application For permit renewal filed.
05000400 REC 1 P IENT ID CODE/NANE PWR-A EB PWR-A FOB PWR-A PD2 PD PWR-A PSB INTERNAL: ADN/LFI'1B IE FILE IE/DGAVT/GAB 21 NRR PMR-B ADTS NRR/DHFT/NTB R(:N2 EXTERNAL: BNL(ANDTS ONLY)
LPDR 03 NSIC 05 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 0
1 1
3 3
1 1
1 REC IP IENT ID CODE/NANE PWR-A EICSB PWR-A PD2 LA BUCKLEY'S B 01 PWR-A RSB ELD/HDS1 IE/DEPER/EPB 36 NRR BWR ADTS 04 RN/DDANI/NIB DNB/DSS (ANDTS)
NRC PDR 02 PNL GRUEL> R COPIES LTTR ENCL 2
2 1
1 2
2 1
0 1
1 0
1 1
0 TOTAL NUNBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 30 ENCL 25
II I4 t'
t
SIGHS Carolina Power & Light Company Hr. Harold R.
Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nashington DC 205S5 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT NO.
1 -
DOCKET NO ~ 50-400 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS COHHENT
Dear Hr. Denton:
Carolina Power h Light Company (CPhL) hereby submits an additional comment on the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Technical Specifications.
Attachment 1
provides the comment as well as the justification for the change.
Attachment 2 provides the marked-up Technical Specification page.
If you have any questions on this subject or require additional information, please contact Hr.
Gregg A. Binders at (919) 836-8168
'ours very truly, A.
B. Cutter-Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Licensing Attachments cc:
Hr.
B.
C. Buckley (NRC)
Hr.
G.
F.
Haxwell (NRC-BHNPP)
Dr. J.
Nelson Grace (NRC-RII)
Gibfpgf0299 pgppp400 stbf02$
411 Fayettevllte Street o P. O. Box 1551 o Raleigh, N. C. 27602
CPKL Ca mmmnCa RHNP'P9.nm1 Dr m+C Tmc=An9.c=m1 R~mc=9.+S.mm<i.nnm Record Number:
808 LCO Number:
- 3. 06. 02. 01 Comment Type:
ERROR P8oe Numbet
~/4 6-11 Sect i on Number:
Z. 6. 2. 1 Comment:
CHANGE THE RECIPC FLOW FROM "1500 apm" TO "1822 gpm" AND CHAhlGE THE DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE FROM "170 pe TO "195 paw ".
THESE CHANGES ARE REBUIRED TO CORRECT AN ERROR QN THE PART QF CPSL IN THE DETERMIhlATIQN OF THE MINIl'lUM FLOW AND EQUIVALENT PRESSURE USED IN THE MOST LIMITING SAFETY ANALYSIS. THE SAFETY ANALYSIS IS NOT AFFECTED NQR HAS ANY ASPECT OF ACTUAL PLANT DESIGN OR PERFORMANCE CHANGED. THIS EPROR AFFECTS ONLY THE SELECTION OF ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THIS SURVEILLANCE TEST.
THE PROPOSED FLOW IS THE MINIMUM FLOW VALUE USED IN THE CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL CALCULATION WITH THE ASSUMED'EAK CONTAINMENT PRESSURE QF 42 prig.
THE DIFFERENTIAL.PRESSURE-IS THE VALUE NEEDED TQ ENSURE DELIVERY QF THE MI'NIMUN'FLOW. THIS REQUIRED PRESSUPE DOES NQT AFFECT,.:THE MINIMUM NPSH REQUIRED FOR THE SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE QF THE PUMP-FSAR PAGEB 6 ~ 2. 1-6 AND '6. 2: 1-36 WILL 8E REVISED TQ REFLECT THE VALUE -OF1832 gpm.
THE SPRAY FLOW RATE OF 1500 gpm ON FSAR PAGE 6.5.2-5 IS CORRECT AND IS A CONSERVATIVE ABSUhlPTION FOR THE IODINE REMOVAL ANALYSIS.
CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3/4.6.2 DEPRESSURIZATION AND COOLING SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION
- 3. 6. 2. 1 Two independent Containment Spray Systems shall be OPERABLE with each Spray System capable of taking suction from the RWST and transferring suction to the containment sump.
APPLICABILITY:
MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.
ACTION:
With one Containment Spray System inoperable, restore the inoperable Spray System to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />; restore the inoperable Spray System to OPERABLE status within the next 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> or be in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
Refer also to Specification 3.6.2.3 Action.
SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.6.2. 1 Each Containment Spray System shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:
a.
At least once per 31 days by verifying that each valve (manual, power-operated, or automatic) in the flow path that is not locked,
- sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in its correct position; b..
By,verifying -tha~. "n an-indicated..recirculation flow of at least lg32,~ gpm,'ach pump develops a differential pressure of greater than
. or equal to ~~
when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5; C%2aiek >'l5 ps) c.
=.:.At..least once per -18 months during shutdown, by:
=;-..;,1.=.:=Verifying that each automatic valve..in the flow path actuates
.-.=.:,'
to its'correct position on a 'containment spray actuation test signal and
.2.
Verifying that each spray pump starts automatically on a
... containment spray actuation test signal.
3.
Verifying that, coincident with an indication of containment spray pump running, each automatic valve from the sump and RWST actuates to its appropriate position following an RWST Lo-Lo test signal.
d.
At least once per 5 years by performing an air or smoke flow test through each spray header and verifying each spray nozzle is unobstructed.
SHEARON HARRIS " UNIT 1 3/4 6-11