ML17342B214

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of mgt-on-shift Repts for Wk Beginning 880215,per 871019 NRC Order
ML17342B214
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/24/1988
From: Conway W
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
L-88-90, NUDOCS 8803150368
Download: ML17342B214 (42)


Text

REGULA RY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS),

ACCESSION NBR: 8803150368 DOC. DATE: 88/02/24 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET FACIL: 50-250 Turkey Point Plant.

Unit 3i Florida Power and Light C

05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Planti Unit 4> Florida Pacer and Light C

05000251 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CONWAY> W. F.

FloY ida Pacer

~4 Light Co.

REC IP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFIl IATION GRACEI J. N.

Region 2i Ofc of the Director

SUBJECT:

Forwards summary of mg t-on-shi ft rep ts for ek beg inning 880215Iper 87101'P NRC order.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

DOBRO COP IEB RECEIVED: LTR i

ENCL i

BIZE:

TITLE: Turkey Point Management Onshift Program NOTES:

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME DRP/*DR-2 PD2-2 PD INTERNAL:

AEOD NRR DEPY NRR MORISSEAUi D NRR/ADT 12-G-18 NRR/DOE* DIR11E NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OGC 1 5-B-18 RGN2 FILE COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 RECIP IENT ID CODE/NAME NRR/DRP-1/2 EDISONI G DEDRO NRR DIR NRR/ADP 12-G-18 NRR/DLPG/PEB NRR/DRIS DIR9A2 0

ANi J REG FILE 01 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 2

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 EXTERNAL:

LPDR NS I C NRC PDR O~I)< li~ ~

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 23 ENCL 23

~pBRUARy 2 4 1985 L-88-90 Dr. J.

Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N. W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Re:

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 Mana ement-on-Shift Weekl Re ort,

Dear Dr. Grace:

Pursuant to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Order dated October 19,

1987, the attached summary of Management-on-Shift (MOS) reports is submitted.

Should there be any questions on this information, please contact us.

Very truly yours, cC

~

~

~

~

~

~

W. F.

way

< Senior V.P.

Nuclear WFC/SDF/pw Attachment cc:

J.

Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement, USNRC Dr. G. E. Edison, Project Manager,

NRR, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant R.

E. Talion, President, FPL 8803i50368 880224 PDR ADOCK 05000250 R

PDR g

6'i Eel ha~)C o9t g~g I

( d

)J(

<gFlcs

MANQQEMENT ON SHIFT l1OS)

WEEKLY

SUMMARY

REPORT WppK $7+R7JNG february 15, 1988 PAGE 1

OF 1

Four MOS observers were on shift; John A. Dyer, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Quality Control Department (02/15-21/88) days),

Peter L.

Walker, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (02/15-22/88 nights),

Daniel Tomaszewski, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Instrumentation and Control Supervisor (02/15-20/88 nights),

and R.

C.

Sontag, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant INPO Coordinator.

During the reporting period, Unit 3 continued the startup process reaching 254 power.

Unit 4

completed scheduled maintenance activities and initiated startup efforts reaching 320'F Reactor Coolant System temperature at the end of the reporting period.

No immediate safety problems or questionable work practices were identified during the reporting period.

During the reporting period, the MOS observers noted about twenty recommendations or areas for improvement.

These suggestions and concerns included:

1 ~

2 ~

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Seven comments were made concerning procedures to control maintenance activities and return equipment to service.

Four comments were made on housekeeping and storage practices.

Three comments were made on industrial safety practices.

Three comments were made on procedures and drawings with concern about both accuracy and procedural control.

Two comments on the condition of equipment were made and concerned the Control Room door and Area Radiation Monitoring System.

One comment was made to update I&C Technician training on a

new piece of equipment.

An often repeated comment was made on the problems of encountering differences between the original Technical Specifications and the Standardized (interim)

Technical Specifications.

Procedural guidance is being developed on the use and implementation of the Interim Technical Specifications.

This procedure will replace the Interim Technical Specifications.

ATTACHMENT'OS DAILY REPORTS

0-ADM-019

~Lnagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date 02/15/88 From:

John A. D er bseruer)

Shift:

Qx Day g Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Morning meetings Shift briefings Planning meetings Unit 3 "Reactor Protection System Logic Test" 3-OSP-049.1 Plant tour secondary and Radiation Control Area outside the containment.

Unit 3 and Unit 4 Control Room operations Unit 3 in mode 3, 547'F and 2235 psig Unit 4 in mode 5 B.

Immediate safety problems C.

D.

E.

None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 2.

Reactor operator trainees performed the "Reactor Protection System Logic Test" under direction of the Reactor Control Operator (RCO).

If trainees had any questions they immediately asked guidance.

The RCO was attentive to the conduct of the test and readily responded to trainees questions.

Good exchange of information at the shift briefings.

Recommendations None Completed By:

A Der server Date:

02/15/88 Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

~

/e perations uperi ntendent-uclear t,',S

/'ate:

~ '~,,J

.I P

ae ate IM(IlI.I nl I>7iee 02/15/88

0-ADM-019 Oanagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT To Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02 15-16 88 From:

P. L, Walke M server)

Shift:

Q Day px Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 - Calibration tests performed on Source and Intermediate range channels.

Found a problem on N32.

Control Rod Drive Mechanism Motor/Generator sets started.

Unit in hot standby Unit 4 - Unit in cold shutdown with repairs underway on condenser water boxes.

Placed turbine on turning gear Started 4C Reactor Coolant pump-began heatup Drew bubble in pressurizer, stabilized level at 25%

B.

C.

D.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments OK - smooth shift, good turnovers Recommendations None Completed By:

P. L. Walker server Date:

02/15-16/88 Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Management Review By:

P g'N

/)/i ill te Date 02/15-16/88 Vl Zl

0-ADM-019

~anagement on Shift (MOSS MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date 02/15-16/88 From:

A.

D.J, Tomaszewski (M

6server Plant evolutions observed Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Unit 3 N-44 Nuclear Instrumentation Power Range Periodic Test N-32 Nuclear Instrumentation Drawer Calibration Testing of Control Valve 310A after repair Unit 4 Test of Generator Liquid Detectors Pressurizer heatup 4C Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger maintenance Tour RCA outside Containment Shift briefing C.

D.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement IGC Specialists performing calibration of the Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation system were not familiar with operation or calibration of the low noise preamplifier.

One section had to be redone as a result of this.

Training needs to be done to familiarize them with the operation of the new equipment.

E.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 2.

Procedure Usage-The Turbine Operator performing the test of the Unit 4 Generator liquid level Detectors was not initialing steps as they were performed.

Even though this was a non-safety procedure he was corrected by the APSN immediately.

This was good reinforcement of management expectations by the on shift supervision.

The Shift Technical Advisor was working with an I and C Specialist to clear up a Plant Work Order related to the one the I and C Specialist was working on associated with control valve CV-310A.

This resulted in two problems being fixed on one work order.

Both the Shift Technical Advisor and the Technician had a good cooperative attitude and were quick to realigqthat the same problem had created both work orders.

Good recogni4Kon of a common cause by both parties.

aMlli.t I'aatia7 02/15-16/88

0-ADM-019 anagement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Recommendations None Completed By:

D.J. Tomaszewski bseruer Date:

Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Management Review By:

P

-N ae

)gib ISS ate VP ate MANAGEMENTINITIALRESPONSE

  • M(WIllliU7'bl 02/15-16/88

0-ADM-019 management on Shift (MOS)

NOS DA1LYREPORT To:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

From:

(M bser ocr)

Shi ft:

Qx Day Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Morning meeting Shift briefings "125 VDC Station Battery Monthly Maintenance" O-SME-003.2 Scheduling meeting Hazardous waste container storage area Plant tours Immediate safety problems None C.

Questionable work practices None D.

Area(s) for improvement 1,

Hazardous Waste Containment-posting 2.

125 VDC station battery monthly maintenance Refer to section F-Recommendations E.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 1.

Shift briefings and turnover continue to be excellent.

2.

Observed a truck delivering chemicals at the chemical storage area between Units 2 6 3.

The driver left the truck and it was still running after he had backed to the unloading dock.

The accompanying security guard immediately turned off the ignition and removed the keys.

Good job.

  • MOB,I I'C/Ul/bf

0-ADM-019 i(nagement on Shift(MOS) 0 MOS DAILYREPORT Page F.

Recommendations D.l The Hazardous Waste Storage Area shared by the fossil 6 nuclear units is not posted in accordance with paragraph 5.2.5 of O-ADM-015.2 "Hazardous Waste Handling and Storage".

Post warning sign on the East and West sides of the storage area alerting personnel to the danger.

D.2 Procedure O-SME-003.2

1. Paragraph 4.2.4 states that battery float voltage is not to exceed 13Z VDC unless the battery is isolated from DC Bus.
2. Paragraph 6.4.3.2 lists acceptance criteria for float voltage as 129 to 135 VDC. This is also reflected on attachment 5 page 3 of 14, step 6.4.3.2.

The upper limit of 135 VDC exceeds the 13Z VDC listed in the limitations.

Revise procedure to clarify this discrepency.

Completed By:

Reviewed By:

John A. Dyer M

bseruer I

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear D

Date: > r /i.

/

Management Review By:

alltks I ol tt; ae PPP ND ~-VP ate 02/16/88

0-ADM-019 1OInagement on Shift (MOB)

MOS DAILYREPOR'F

'I'o:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

From:

P. L. Walker

(

6server)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 Halfway through Rod Acceptance Test, Source Range Channel N32 failed (about 2325).

The channel was repaired and placed back in service at 0425 (5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> later)

Unit continues in hot standby Unit 4 4B Reactor Coolant Pump was started after completion of Flywheel key maintenance.

Performance is acceptable.

Work continues on waterbox with Unit in cold shutdown-emphasis being placed on Unit 3 B.

Immediate safety problems None C.

Questionable work practices None D.

Area(s) for improvement 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> to repair Unit 3's Nuclear Instrumentation Channel N32 was a very long time for an item which was holding up acceptance testing required for unit startup.

Operation's part (initiation and closeout testing) was conducted expeditiously.

The Control room door (new) is balky to open, and sticks open.

Shift turnover willcaution personnel to fully close it when entering.

and exiting.

H.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments See D,J. Tomaszewski's report F.

Recommendations None Completed By:

P. L. Walker M

6server

)

Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuc1ear Date:

02/16-17/88 Management Review By:

~3

/-'i< '+

ly >y '+

P ate Date VP

  • Ml)S I otal'I/56

~ate 6? / 16-17/88

0-ADM-019 OLnagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02/16-17/88 From:

D. J. Tomaszewski (M

bseroer)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Shift turnover Mechanical maintenance turnover RCA tour Maintenance on 4C Component Cooling IVater Heat Exchanger Maintenance on Nuclear Instrumentation N-32 Preamplifier Hot Rod position indication calibration Post maintenance testing of intermediate range Nuclear Instrumentation System Channel N-36 Start of 4B Reactor Coolant Pump B.

C.

D.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement None e Mill.l I'Dolie7

0-ADM-019 nagement on Shift (MOB)

MOS DAILYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments l.

In progress maintenance on the Rod Control System, PWO 870Z (worked l/14/88), resulted in the Control Rod Speed being set at 48 steps per minute instead of 72 steps per minute.

Steps on the work order for returning the system to normal for unit startup had not yet been completed.

The IGC department needs to ensure that work on this item is complete prior to unit startup.

Partially completed work'rders need to be reviewed to ensure that they do not leave the plant in an unexpected condition.

This needs to be done prior to startup.

Although this is not a safety function of the

system, the equipment should act as expected or appropriate information tags should be hung.

Z.

Source Range Channel, N-32, failed low while rod testing was in progress.

The shift crew took appropriate action to return all control rods to the fully inserted position and open the Reactor Trip Breakers.

Recommendations 2.

Review incomplete work in progress or on hold to ensure that normal operation of equipment is not impacted.

This should be done prior-to unit startup.

An excessive amount of time was taken to initiate repair of source range, N-32.

The supervisor in charge of the job was not aware that his work crew was not working the job. Key activities should have closer supervision to ensure progress on the job.

W Completed By:

Reviewed By:

bserver 7

.A,,(f i'perations Superintendent-Nuclear D

Date:

+I/ 7~f i

/

Management Review By:

IMILi.lOIIIFI'8 PM1'th ate ~o 02/16-17/88

0-ADM-019 lnagement on Shift (MOS)0 MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02 17 88 From:

John A. D er seruer Shift:

Qx Day Q Night h.

Plant evolutions observed Morning meeting Shift briefings Planning meeting Control Room operations

- Unit 3 in Mode 3

- Unit 4 in Mode 5 Reviewing 125VDC system surveillance procedures against interim Technical Specificat tons surveillance requirements Plant tours:

Secondary side and radiation controlled area outside the containment B.

Immediate safety problems None C.

Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift briefings continue as a good exchange of information and unit status.

Operators attentive to duty and give trainees every opportunity to perform control board functions.

Recommendations None Completed By:

John A. D er seruer Date:

Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

perat<ons uperintendent-uc ear

~~r rw ate 02l17/88

0-ADM-019 llinagement on Shift (MOB)

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

7-From:

P.L W lke bseruer)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 - Hot standby Rod Position Indication Calibration testing completed around 0330 Rod drop testing under way-conoseal torquing and pressurizer spray valve maintenance remains to be done Unit 4 - Mode 5 with a bubble in pressurizer - 180 Observed work continuing on Condensor Water Box - patching almost complete.

Switchyard bus sectionalfzing was performed to clean insulators.

Walked down intake structure area and turbine building.

B.

C.

D.

B.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Quiet shift Training of new operators proceeding

- does not interfere with normal operations.

Control room door seems to be working better'.

My congratulations to all eight new SRO's.

Recommendatfons None Completed By:

P. L. Walker bserver D

j r

Reviewed By:

Operations Superi ntendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

P eL!VS I nlr<IVIM ae ate

~V/~ n Date 02/17-18/88

0-ADM-019 Itnagement on Shift (MOB)

MOS DAILYREPORT TQ Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

02/17-18I88 From:

D. J. Tomaszewski (M

bserver)

Shift:

Q Day gx Night h.

Plant evolutions observed Peak shift end of shift meeting Shift turnover Unit 3 individual rod position calibration Unit 3 rod drop timing test Unit 4 control rod cable testing Gland Exhaust Condenser maintenance 4C Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger maintenance Unit 3 Containment isolation Rack testing C.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None D.

Area(s) for improvement Welding on the 4C Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger had b'een completed earlier in the day but the room deluge system had not yet been placed back in service.

The PSN and Maintenance Supervisor were contacted and restored the system.

Fire protection systems secured for welding or grinding should be returned to service as soon as work is complete.

0-ADM-019 nagement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DA1LYREPORT Page Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Observed seal oil system startup on Unit 3.

The procedures were in hand and being followed step by step.

Problems noted two nights ago were no longer evident.

Recommendations Ensure welding procedures or work orders are adequate to ensure fire protection systems are returned to service promptly on completion of welding activity.

Completed By:

D. J, Tomaszewski I

server Date:

02/17-18/88 Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Management Review By:

P ae i~9. l 0 ate

/z'r at IM(Ãi.lUliorM 02/17-18/88

0-A0 M-019

'nagement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02/l8/88 From:

John A. Dyer

(

server)

Shift:

Qx Day Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Morning meeting Shift briefings Scheduling meeting Control Room operations Unit 3 in Mode 547'235 psig Unit 4 in Mode 5, bubble in pressurizer 180 Plant tours: Secondary side and radiation controlled area outside the containment B.

C.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Normal shift operations.

Operators, both licensed and non-licensed attentive to duties.

Recommendations None Completed'By:

John A. D er server Date:

02/18/88 Reviewed By; perations uperi nten nt-Nuclear Management Review By:

  • 4(&.(nl aTraa

/') i.'<

ate

/9~9()SL,D '

/ ~ / f/ZC ate 02/18/88

0-ADM-019 lnagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAlLYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02/18-19/88 From:

P. L. Walker (M

6seroer)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night A.

Fiant evolutions observed Unit 3 - Hot Standby Decision was made to keep step counters in old (unfused) condition.

Turbine Valve Test was performed - tripped properly, but had difficulty in getting Control Valves open after the test.

During turbine test, a

pressurizer spray valve controller circuit forced it's valve full open, resulting in a rapid depressurization event.

Operator stabilized pressure by manually shutting valve and ensuring heaters full on quickly! During subsequent testing, a FORV was opened, but it's block valve had already, been shut.

No depressurization occurred.

Shutting the block valve had to be done at the valve in containment.

Unit 4 continues in cold shutdown - 180'F.

B.

Immediate safety problems None C.

Questionable work practices None D.

Area(s) for improvement None I

Miami.l Iduhe1

0-AD M-019 nagement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT IIaSe Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 2.

Kurt Kruger, Reactor Control Operator for Unit 3, deserves praise for reacting in a prompt, very efficient manner to the spray valve failure.

Pressure dropped very rapidly, and safety injection would have occurred without his immediate intervention.

There were other courses of action he could have taken which would not have resulted in stabilizing pressure in this case.

Normally, operators are trained to place the Master Pressure Controller in manual and raise the output.

This would not have worked in this case due to the grounding type of failure, He did exactly what was called for in this case.

The operations staff also made a very good decision to close the pressurizer power operated relief valve, following Gary Phipps'ecommendation that some action be taken to avoid depressurization due to a potential for opening the FORV during troubleshooting of the pressure controls.

The relief valve did open, Recommendations None Completed By:

M 6server P. L. Walker Date:

02/18-19/88 Revi'ewed By:

Operations Superinten ent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

  • M(I!II IIIrlI'/ II8 PM-Date

/rl 3'i S~

'~ P

/ ~ o'/!';.'r 02/18-19/88

0-ADM-019 iInagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02 18-19/88 From:

D. J. Tomaszewski (M

bserver)

Shift' Day px Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Shift turnover Periodic testing Pressurizer pressure control failure Power operated relief valve block valve failure Rod Position Indication System maintenance Pressurizer Pressure Control loop troubleshooting ROD Control system maintenance B.

C.

D.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The Unit 3 operator responded quickly and properly to the failure in the Pressurizer Pressure Control System.

The failure. was unusual in nature and could have easily resulted in safety injection.

Lowest noted pressure was about 2100 psig well above the setpoint.

Technicians using print 5610-M-430-233 to troubleshoot the pressure control failure noted that the print had inaccuracies on it. Specifically, the controller for valve PCV-455B was labeled as PCV-455A.

The technicians stopped and field verified the configuration before proceeding.

The field configuration matched other plant configuration drawings.

The drawing also does not show PC-3-444G/R and PC-3-444D/R connected.

This drawing requires correction.

The technicians were aware of the mechanism to get the drawing corrected.

0-AD M-019 anagement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT F.

Recommendations 2.

3.

Correct drawing 5610-M-430-233.

This drawing is listed as Revision 0,

dated March 25, 1987 and was made from superceded drawing 5610-M-430-39, Rev 15 The construction crew working the Gland Exhaust Condenser had rigged a hose and power cord on the floor.

A recent memo from the site Safety Supervisor requires these hoses to be rigged overhead to prevent personnel tripping on them.

A construction safety man was on the job but did not spot the deficiency.

Construction needs to ensure they stay up to date on site safety requirements.

PWO Tag 313654 dated 2/4/88 was on 4B Component Cooling Water Strainer stating it needed cleaning.

Delta pressure appeared normal (0.5 psid).

I checked with ASPN and found PWO originated but not approved.

PWO's should be approved promptly after origination.

The Nuclear Operator could have been misled by the tag into thinking he already had a PWO if the strainer needed cleaning at a later date.

Completed By:

D. J. Tomaszewski

~ M server Date:

02/18-19/88 Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

kMLLiI ulna'6s Operations Superintendent-Nuclear PM-N ate

~ Q I

~

Date:

ate 02/18-19/88

0-ADM-019 lonagement on Shift (MOS) ~

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02/19/88 From:

John A. D er (M

bseroer)

Shift:

Qx Day Q Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Morning meetings Shift briefings Scheduling meeting Control Room activities Unit 3 in Mode 3 Unit 4 in Mode 5 Isolation of 4A-4KV Bus due to water leakage from room air conditioner B.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None D.

Area(s) for improvement None

  • M(N:it'C/UII57

0-ADM-019 iOnagement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREFORT Page Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Observed preparations and planning involved in the removal of the 4A-4KV Bus from service.

The PSN reviewed the breaker list and procedures relevant to the deenergization of the 4KV Bus.

In addition he made a list of personnel to notify and how they would be affected as a result of the power outage (Security computers, etc.).

He then asked the APSN to do an independent review.

The PSN and APSN then discussed their reviews to ensure they were in agreement.

Subsequent to the PSN/ASPN review, they reviewed the evolution with the duty shift personnel by going over procedures, Piping and Instrument Diagrams and Control Wiring Diagrams and the actions to be taken.

They discussed all equipment that would be out of service and any monitoring of equipment parameters that would be required.

The PSN requested that trainees perform as many of the evolutions as possible, under direction of licensed operators, as part of their On-The-Job training.

As a result of this careful planning the removal of the 4A 4KV Bus from service was a smooth operation with no problems.

F.

Recommendations None Completed By; D e M

6server Date:

Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date: '+

Management Review By:

  • M(N.Inl/o7 ee PM-'e

>)>>/S~

Date VP Date OZ/19/88

0-ADM-019

~agement on Shift (MOS) ~

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date; 02/19-20/88 From:

P. L. Walker seroer)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Attended discussions'on malfunctioning Rod Position Indicator and Power-Operated Relief Valve Block Valve.

Watched recovery from a major 4160 volt Bus loss.

B.

Immediate safety problems None C.

Questionable work practices None D.

Area(s) for improvement None aMLL>.l I'/Uhe7

0-ADM-019 Oanagement on Shift (MOSQ MOS DAILYREPORT Page B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Recovery of the 4160 VAC Bus was smoothly performed.

Control Room was very warm.-made operators feel fatigued, but they remained alert and attentive.

The staff caucused just prior to Bus recovery and informally planned out their actions.

Applicable portions of several procedures were followed to restore equipment to full operability-nothing was

missed, and everything appeared to function smoothly.

A few pieces were balky, but worked.

The operators prefer this mode of operation, as it affords them a degree of flexibility which would be unavailable to them if another unifying nBus loss" procedure was fabricated for their guidance.

Recommendations None Completed By:

P. L. Walker M

bserver Date:

8 Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

PM-at a hltLS.I ol/IIVeh Date Date 02/19-20/88

0-AD M-019 I+nagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT To Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02/19-20/88 From:

D. J. Tomaszewski (I

bserver)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Shift turnover Rod Position Indication system maintenance Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation maintenance Testing of MOV-536 Restoration of 4A 4KV Bus Plant tour Testing of a Emergency Diesel Generator B.

Immediate safety problems None C.

Questionable work practices None D.

Area(s) for improvement None

0-ADM-019 nage ment on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT I'age E.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Restoration of the 4A 4KV Bus was performed in a professional, business-like manner.

Line ups were done per procedure and testing was performed to ensure equipment operability.

Recommendations The unused status board on the north wall of the nuclear watch engineers office should 'be removed.

2.

The shift technical advisors desk blocks access to vertical panel B on units and should be removed from the surveillance area.

3.

The hearing protection boxes on each end of the 18 foot elevation of the turbine area were empty for the second night in a row.

Someone should be assigned responsibility for keeping them filled on a routine basis.

Completed By:

M bserver Date:

Reviewed By:

perati ons Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

P

-N at ate 1l D

02/19-20/88

0-ADM-019 management on Shift (MOS)O MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear 'ate:

02/20/88 From:

John A. D er (M

bserver)

Shift:

Qx Day Q Night A.

Plant evolutions observed Morning meeting Shift briefings Planning meeting Plant tours - secondary side and radiation controlled areas outside the containment Control Room operations Unit ¹3 Mode 3 Unit ¹4 Mode 5 B.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None D.

Area(s) for improvement Administrative duties - Refer to section F.

lM(ki,I I'Vol/e7

0-ADM-019 management on Shift (MOS)'

MOS l)AILYREPORT Peg>>

E.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments

1. This is a followup on my MOS daily report of 2/5/88 pertaining to the following:

a.

Use of the "On-The-Spot-Change" (OTSC) stamp discussed in Administrative Procedure AP 0190.86 and b.

The requirement to attach sections 1,2,3 and 4 of the procedure in use to the sections or attachments being used in the field as discussed in Administrative Procedure 0-ADM-201 There has been great improvement in both of the above areas.

There are, however, procedures still being performed without:

1.

An OTSC stamp on the procedure, 2.

The OTSC stamp being completed and/or 3.

Sections 1,2,3 and 4 being attached to sections being used in the field.

Personnel in general have varied opinions and understanding as to the purpose and use of the OTSC stamp.

AP 0190.86 requires that ~onl each procedure in the "Document Control Spare Copy File" be stamped with the OTSC stamp.

There are, however uncontrolled procedures still current that have not been revised since the use of the OTSC was initiated.

These procedures, except for the "Document Control Spare Copy File", have not been stamped with an OTSC stamp.

In addition if a controlled copy is xeroxed for use, it doesn't have the required stamp.

Recommendation in Section F 2.

Shift briefings continue as a

highpoint.

Good information exchanges and status update.

0-AD M-019 tanagement on Shift (MOS MOS DAILYREPORT Page F.

Recommendations 2.

3a.

b.

4.

- When procedures are revised or upgraded make the first prerequisite a

~si nofE requiring that the procedure has been verified against a controlled copy to be current and that it has been determined if the procedure is affected by an OTSC (recommended by two PSN's).

Issue a stamp to all holders of controlled documents, especially to operators (control room) and to the GEMS planners so they can stamp procedures when the need arises.

The stamp needs to have the same information as recommended in (I) above.

Operations continue to use the shift briefings as a vehicle to remind those in attendance of the requirement of these administrative functions.

Maintenance disciplines need to relay this information to the journeymen and GEMS planners.

This information should be discussed frequently until it becomes a working habit with everyone.

Issue a

memorandum to all department heads reaf firming the importance of administrative duties in the document/procedure area.

Completed By:

John A. D er server D

Reviewed By:

perations uperintendent-uclear Date: ~

Management Q

Review By:

at FINAI.PAGE vr 02/20/88

0-AD M-019 nagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT To Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02/20-21/88 From:

P. L. Walker (M

server)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Plant evolutions observed Unit 3 - Attempt to go critical 4

Unit 4 - Cold shutdown - steady at 180'.

Immediate safety problems None C.

Questionable work practices None D.

Area(s).for improvement None 1 ME)'i.I I'ZUIin'I

0-ADM-019 tnagement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Page Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Tonight's shift was the culmination of a long, frustrating week.

Many small deficiencies have cropped up, in sequential order, to delay the startup of Unit 3.

I commend the staff for their patience while the problems were corrected in an orderly, methodical fashion.

They are operating very conservatively.

F.

Recommendations None Completed By:

P. L. Walker bserver Date:

02/20-21/88 Reviewed By:

perations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

PM

  • M(LtiUlla'I'e D t Date VP Date 02/20-21/88

0-A0 M-019 tnagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

From:

R. C. Sonta (M

bserver)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night

)

A.

Plant evolutions observed 0

0 Troubleshooting Unit 3 Rod Position Indications Pull of 4C ICW Pump End of shift and shift turnover meetings Unit 3 Reactor startup attempt Plant tour

-Unit 3 Turbine deck

-Unit 4 Mezzanine deck

-Common: RCA and Control Room B.

C.

D.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement 2.

3.

PWO green tags should be removed from equipment following repairs.

Two green tags were observed on Unit 3 that were not valid.

Tag No.

C309836 dated 2/16/88 did not have a PWO.

Tag No. 307445 on CV-2912 is still there although repairs have been made and valve was in service.

In the case of N32 - the discrepency was brought to the attention of both the R.O. and the IGC Supervisor.

However no one took any action.

Plant material condition has greatly improved over last several months.

However, numerous instances were noted where
cables, hoses,
tools, ladders, etc. were abandoned in the plant.

Unit 3 Control Room north side is being used a a storage area.

Boxes, file cabinets,
chairs, a bulletin board, lockers and hard hats are stored on the floor, against the wall 6 racks.

This clutter made access to the RPI racks difficult. In addition, the lighting on the north side of the Rod Position Indication (RPI) racks is nonexistent.

Apparently one or two lighting fixtures are missing.

Maintenance on the RPI's was conducted by flashlight.

0-ADM-019 management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Page Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments 2.

Upon my arrival at the job site of 4C ICW pump, I noted that two of the four men on the job were without hard hats.

The foreman arrived shortly thereafter and immediately corrected the men, without knowledge of my presence.

The startup attempt was professionally done.

Three trainees took turns on the panel.

Reactor Operator Eric Anderson conducted their training.

Allevolutions were thoroughly discussed before execution.

Recommendations 2.

The lighting and clutter in Unit 3 Control Room should receive near term attention.

Added attention should be placed on cleanup and followup after maintenance/construction efforts.

Completed By:

R, C. Sonta M

6seroer Date 02/ZO-21/88 Reviewed By:

CA Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By; PM

  • hl(li,I ulay; ee 3

/

at ate P

/~ate 02/20-21/88

0-ADM-019 anagement on Shift (MOS MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

oz/zl/ss From:

John A D er server)

Shift:

Qx Day CI Night Plant evolutions observed Morning meeting Shift briefings Plant tours Control Room Operations Unit 3 Mode 2 - Auxiliary Feed Pump operability verification and nitrogen backup Installation of motor on 4C Intake Cooling Water Pump B.

C.

D.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments None Recommendations None Completed By; John A. D er server Date:

Reviewed By:

perations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

P

/49't ate

~ate 02/21/88

0-ADM-019 nagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02/21-22 88 From:

P. L. IValker(I bseruer Plant evolutions observed Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Unit 3 Power escalation from 2o'o to 25%

Turbine roll - synchronize to grid Feed System placed in automatic Unit 4 Heatup from 200 F to 320 F C.

D.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement The Area Radiation Monitoring System has a majority of it's channels out of service.

The on-line radiation monitoring capability is surprisingly far under what it should be, and has to be supplemented by periodic surveys.

0-ADM-019 Ionagement on Shift (MOS)~

MOS DAILYREPORT Page Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The staff did well tonight - there were some very complex maneuvers to perform requiring a great deal of communication both inside and outside the Control Room.

During the middle of preparations for Turbine Roll, the Feedwater Pump quit, and the operators handled the transient very nicely.

Recommendations I'm surprised at the amount of time it is taking to resolve the technical specification

issue, Again and again, we are encountering differences between the actual (original) and the interim (standard) specifications.

h'y previous recommendation still stands.

Completed By:

M bserver Date:

Reviewed By:

perati ons Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

PM aM(N.I UINT'ea at e

VP Date 02/21-22/88

0-ADM-019 nagement on Shift (MOS)y MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

02 21-22 88 From:

R. C. Sonta (M

seruer)

Plant evolutions observed Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Shift turnover briefing 4C ICVV Pump work Unit 3 Turbine roll, synchronization Fi load to 25'.a Plant tour B.

C.

D.

Immediate safety problems None Questionable work practices None Area(s) for improvement IVhen Unit 3 hogging jet air ejector was placed in service, large amounts of hot water and steam were expelled into the turbine deck because the R-15 radiation detector had been removed from the system leaving the system open to atmosphere.

Operations was not aware that the detector had been removed.

There was no clearance.

I 6 C peak crew was not aware that work was being performed on R-15 or what the status of the work was.

This seems to be a breakdown of communications between Maintenance and Operations as well as within Maintenance itself.

a MEN.l l>elie7

0-ADM-019

+nagement on Shift (MOS)$

MOS DAILYREPORT Page Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments The conduct of Operation's personnel while bringing the unit on the line was very good.

Three Reactor Operators and three trainees manned the control board during this evolution.

Communications were informal but good.

Teamwork was evident.

Good work!

The I 6 C peak crew responded well to the problem with the R-15 detector and was able to seal the air ejector system in a matter of minutes.

Recommendatlons In interviewing the I 6 C Field Supervisor whose crew removed R-15, he said that he received permission to remove the detector without a clearance on January 23, 1988.

At that time the unit was down and it appeared that the detector would be out for only a short period of time. I recommend that positive controls or policies be considered when allowing maintenance to take place on systems without a clearance, that will ensure that the system is returned to normal.

Completed By:

server Dt:~

Reviewed By:

perations Superintendent-Nuclear Date.

Management Review By:

  • MOlt.I Ul/o7'ee PM-N ate VP Date 02/21-22/88