ML17329A704

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs Upgrading Reactor Protection Sys Instrumentation
ML17329A704
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 12/16/1992
From:
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17329A705 List:
References
NUDOCS 9212180053
Download: ML17329A704 (70)
v • d • e


Text

ISSUES G LIST FILE MO.

1. BACKGROUND INFORNAT ION A. FUNCTIONAL DRA'MINGS 1 ~ For any "functional" or "logics changes, provide diagrams and an 1A2 - Functional Drawings explanation. 1B2d-General System Description
2. Provide the loop diagrams, and functional diagrams for the RPS Existing: 1-D-1, 1-A-1 channels including the current revision of the modification package. New: 1A2, 1D2
3. Provide rack internal and external arrangement drawings. 1G
4. Provide plant one-line power drawings (120v) feeding cabinets (new Existing: 1E1 and existing). Hew: 1E2
7. Provide the existing elementary drawings - RPS only. 1-D-1
8. Provide the new elementary drawings - RPS only. 1-D-2
9. Provide rack asseahly drawings. 1-G B. System Architectural Descriptions
1. Detailed drawings of the Foxboro Spec 200/Spec 200 Hiero Electronics. 1-8-2b, drawings contained in Instruction Hanuals
2. Provide Foxboro RPS equipment information including the Factory Available at Foxboro Acceptance Tests, Service Bulletins, trouble reports/maintenance requests.
3. Provide assurance that the system, when installed, will meet the requirements of the plant design basis, including the FSAR and licensing coMIIt ments

- Origin of functional requirements 1-B1-B existing 1-B2-E new

- Provide functional block diagrams before/after the upgrade VKV report in file 24AS, figures 1 and 2, and Section 2.2.

- Demonstrate equivalency, are there differences in the functional 1. 50.59 review requirements. 2. 4/21/92 presentation

4. Provide setpoints, gains, constants, resets, etc., traceable to 24.G.2 design basis.

Page 1 of 17 12/15/92

FILE NO

2. Applicable Reg Guide and Standards A. Describe the degree of conformance to IEEE 603, especially regarding:

- Single Failure Criterion 1. VIV report in file 24A5

a. analog Spec 200 discussed in Sec 3.1.3 Discussion of IEEE-603-1980, Sect 5.1
b. Digital Spec 200 MICRO discussed in Section 3.2.3 Discussion of IEEE-603-1980, Sec 5.1
2. 281, page 6 of 13

- Completion of Protective Action VRV report in file 24A5

a. Analog Spec 200 discussed in Sect. 3.1.3 Discussion of IEEE-603-1980, Sect 5.2
b. Digital Spec 200 MICRO discussed in Sect.

3.2.3 Discussion of IEEE-603-1980, Sect. 5.2

2. 281, page 6 of 13

- Independence 1. V8V report in file 24A5

a. Analog Spec 200 discussed in Sect. 3.1.3 Discussion of IEEE-603-1980, Sect. 5.6
b. Digital Spec 200 MICRO discussed in Sect.

3.2.3 Discussion of IEEE-603-1980, Sect. 5.6

2. 281, pages 8 and 9 of 13

- Test and Calibration Capabilities V&V report in file 24A5

a. Analog Spec 200 discussed in Sect. 3.1.3 Discussion of IEEE-603-1980, Sect. 5.7
b. Digital Spec 200 MICRO discussed in Sect
3. '1.2 Discussion of IEEE-603-1980, Sect. 5.7
2. 281, pages 9 and 10 of 13 B. Describe the degree of conformance of the installed system to IEEE VRV report in file 24A5, Sect. 2 and Sect.

384, especially regarding: 3.1.3, discussion on IEEE-603-1980.

- Inputs; isolation, separation and barriers 1. V8V report in file 24A5, Sect. 2 and Sect.

3.1.3, discussion on IEEE-603-'1980.

2. 281, pages 8 and 9 of 13 Page 2 of 17 12/15/92

- Outputs; isolation, separation and barriers 1. VIIV report in file 24A5, Sect. 2 and Sect.

3.1.3, discussion on IEEE-603-1980.

2. 281, pages 8 and 9 of 13

- Independence of safety/non-safety signals; isolation separation and V8V report in file 24AS, Sect. 2 and Sect.

barriers 3.1.3, discussion on IEEE-603-1980.

2. 281, pages 8 and 9 of 13 C. Details on how we meet all of the Reg. Guide, IEEE Standards, etc., 24AS and 281 referenced in our purchase order specification.
3. Specific Comparison to Haddam Heck for Both Hardware and Software 3-A
4. Temperature and Hunidity A. Provide the evaluation that established the design temperature limits 48 page 2 of 4 to be experienced within the enclosure for the new instrunentation. f Speci ies equipment requirements The overall enviroraental report will not be written until February 1993.

B. Provide thermal test reports and plans. 4A 4B-reviews 4A 4C-add'l plan 4D-appv'l for 4C plan Items 4C and 4D are test procedures which will be performed to demonstrate that the heat rise in the circuit cards is acceptable.

C. Describe any anomalies that may have occurred during all of the 48 Foxboro testing and how they were resolved.

An additional heat rise test will be done in January 1993.

Page 3 of 17 12/15/92

LE

5. Seismic A. Describe the conformance to 'IEEE 344 for the installed design. 58, 5C, Provide the seismic evaluation accounting for any amplifications due to 1.8.2H(3 folders) the installed configuration to demonstrate that this was considered. 5E - overall seismic report, i.e. senary 1.8.2.H contains the CA test procedures and test report which qualifies the modules to IEE 344-1975 B. Provide seismic qualification test report and plan. 58, 5C, 1.8.2H(3 folders) 5E - overall seismic report, i.e. suanary 1.8.2.H contains the CA test procedures and test report which qualifies the modules to IEE 344-1975 C. Seismic test comparison (initial seismic tests with our present 58, 5C, cabinet configuration). 1.8.2H(3 folders) 5E - overall seismic report, i.e., swmary The original cabinets will continue to be used.

Only the cabinet internals are being changed out.

6. EH I/RF I A. Effects of Retrofit of New Equipment to Existing Systems - Provide 6A, 68, 6C, 6D, 6E the docunentation for EHI and SWC qualification performed by the vendor.

Provide the test plan, methodology, acceptance criteria and results. An additional report will be issued in late December B. Describe the EHI design basis envirorment assumed in the design.

C. Provide any measurements of the plant EHI enviroreent. What design 6H3 features preclude the effects of radiated or conducted emissions from one channel to another. Has the common mode voltage present on the system inputs been measured.

D. Describe EHI test anomalies in terms of cause and effects. 6A, 68, 6C, 6D, 6E An additional report will be issued in late December Page 4 of 17 12/15/92

I LE 0

7. FMEA A. Discuss licensee's comnitment to updating the design basis FHEA. We don't have a design basis FHEA B. Identify any operational constraints on the test features provided in 15C, 15D the new system.

C. The modes and effects of failures due to out-of-range input data: 7C (IEEE 603 requires in part that "...safety systems shall be designed to accomplish their safety functions under the full range of applicable conditions enuaerated in the design basis".

1. Demonstrate that these types of failures have been sufficiently 7C considered and that their consequences are acceptable.
2. Provide analyses demonstrating the range of "allowable" parameter 7C values that will not result in system crash.
3. Demonstrate how operator adjustable parameters will be controlled so 7C as to assure system integrity and performance.

D. Discuss fundamental design basis failure modes and effects. 7C E. Provide a walk-through of a limited sample of design basis failure 7C modes and their effects. 'Where appropriate, provide acceptance test data that conforms either directly or by inference, the following postulated failures:

1. Loss of signal 7C
2. Open circuit of the signal leads 7C
3. Shorting of the signal leads 7C
4. Single grounds on the signal circuits 7C
5. Double grounds on the signal circuits 7C
6. Loss of signal power source 7C
7. Over and under voltage conditions on any circuit 33A, 338
8. Power down/power up transients 98
9. Lockups, etc. 182d, Document needer HI-280-300, Page 13 F. Effects of System Failures on Transient Frequency and Severity 7C
1. General Design Criteria 21, "Protection System Reliability and 7C Testability" includes the requirement that no single component failure shall falsely initiate unnecessary protection system action, demonstrate conformance for a selected channel.

Page 5 of 17 12/15/92

FILE MO G. Provide an analysis to compare the new and old instrunent interfaces 7C and compare their vulnerabilities to short circuits, over voltage connect I ons~ e'tc ~

1. Provide analysis and/or tests to demonstrate protection from "digital 7C type" fai lures such as lockup and timing hazards. Describe the detection and recovery schemes.
2. Demonstrate that the diversity and segmentation provided by the 7C original design has been preserved in the allocation of functions to the modules.

H~ FHEA analysis details including any supporting tests. 7C Page 6 of 17 12/15/92

FILE 0

8. Industry Experience Data A. Provide data on the total user base for the Foxboro line of BA, 8C equipment, organized by industry and application areas.
1. File BA contains list of nuclear applications.
2. File 8C contains list of all applications
3. Foxboro typically is not made aware of exactly how each module is used by its customers.

B. Details of Foxboro's industrial experience with the subject BA, BC equipment.

1. File 8A contains list of nuclear applications.
2. File BC contains list of all applications
3. Foxboro typically is not made aware of exactly how each module is used by its customers.
9. Software Failures (See 1.8.2)

A. Provide the operational history of the software to include such items 24C1 as: what problems were encountered during field integration testing; how 98 were they reported; how were they resolved; how are the problems categorized; etc.

B. Reliability figures need to be provided for the software modules used 1. 87-SRR-001F in Cook Nuclear Plant upgrade system. 87-SRR-003F 87-SRR-008F Duane Growth Rate Curves Available at Foxboro

2. 24C3 C. Details on any software bugs and Part 21 reports. 98 24A2 File 24A2 contains the Foxboro software functional testing report. The software bugs discussed here were discovered during testing.

Only known software bug found during actual use was reported in a Part 21, see file 98.

D. Provide any and all software variances. 24A2 10 'ardware Failures A. Details on any hardware failures and Part 21 reports. 10A and 10B Page 7 of 17 12/15/92

FILE NO

11. Response Time A. Demonstrate that the response times required by the FSAR are 11-8 achievable with margin by the upgraded RPS channels.

B. Details of response times of Foxboro electronics. 11-8

12. Setpoints A. Accuracy specifications to be verified. 24T1-draft procedure 24T2 - review of draft procedure B. Comparison of the Cook Nuclear Plant setpoint allowable values versus the new Foxboro systems performance values.

13 'lectrostatic Discharge A. Provide ESD test reports to identify compatibility of the ESD 6A, 68, 6C, 60 equipment ratings with the Licensee System Specification and the plant control room hunidity limits.

B. Describe on site ESD tests. 13C

14. Training A. Details on training of the Cook Nuclear Plant 18C persons, operators, 14A etc.

Page 8 of 17 12/15/92

FILE 0

15. Procedures A. Have the instruction, maintenance, and data base manuals for the new Instruction and Maintenance Manuals: 1B2A and equipment available for review during the audit. 1B2B Database Manuals: 1H B. Plant-specific procedures concerning maintenance of the new Foxboro hard~are, software, etc.

C. Provide a representative sarple of procedures that demonstrate how 15C Spec 200 considerations have been incorporated. Provide examples of Abnormal Operation Procedures (surveillance, calibration, channel check) These are existing procedures if available. New procedures are currently being written D. Be prepared to discuss how digital specific and Spec 200 issues have 13C been incorporated into these procedures. For example: introduction of noise, potential grounding problems, electrostatic discharge, and New procedures are currently being written.

security requirements for rack and software entry. File 13C contains ESD precautions ED Provide a list of all types/categories of station procedures that are 15A affected by the Spec 200 application.

F. Provide any controlling procedures (administrative) or other 15B docunents which provide guidance on the update of all station procedures with regard to Spec 200.

16. Describe impact on other issues, primarily Reg Guide 1.97. 16
17. Explain AMSAC impact/Provide RFC 3104 packet. 17 A. Explain the impact on the Cook Nuclear Plant AMSAC system due to loss of diversity.

Page 9 of 17 12/15/92

FILE NO

18. Station Blackout Effects A. Temperature
1. Demonstrate that the heat rise in the circuit cards is acceptable. 4C and 4D 4C and 4D are test procedures which will be performed to demonstrate that the heat rise in the circuit cards is acceptable.
2. Provide calculation on HVAC for SBO. 18A1 The calculation in file 18A1(ID. No.

DCCHV12TA07N dated 3/12/91) provides the latest HVAC analysis for the rise of the temperatures within the Control Room following a Station Blackout B. Battery Loading

1. Demonstrate consistency with FSAR requirements, licensing comnitments 22A (including SBO), and vendor design qualification.

Page 10 of 17 12/15/92

F E

19. Describe impact on bypass/trip indications, if any. 19
20. Provide errata sheets and evaluations of generic chip problems. 20 A. Was a parts stress analysis performed on the microprocessor boards? The results of a parts stress analysis have been incorporated into Foxboro's engineering docunents, which are available at Foxboro
21. Write Evaluation of Hicrowave and Radar Susceptibility
22. Power A. Describe the design basis quality (e.g., surge, impulse, harmonic 228, page 23 Section 5.4 content conditions assuned for the plant power sources. Provide representative power quality data measured at the plant to verify the assumptions.

B. Provide the total po~er requirements for the new digital 228, page 20 instrunentation.

C. Provide past LERs on the power busses that will feed the Foxboro Spec 228, pages 18 and 19 200 Hicroprocessor. 181a-contains LERs D. Provide information on any failures in our solid state inverters. 228, page 20 Section 5.3 E. Provide the plant vital power quality data for surges, harmonic 228, pages 21 and 22 distortion, spikes, and sags.

F~ Provide the table of connections to the 120Vac power per the Licensee 22F System specification. inrush, etc. may be provided by the FAT.

G. Provide plant LERs, NCEs, and significant HWRs pertinent to the 22E instrunent po~er system.

N. Provide the power supply electrical loading during the qualifications 228, pages 11-14 testing. Generic tests were performed on Foxboro power supplies. No formal Cook specific tests are planned.

I~ Details of inverter loading. 228 J. Details of power supply test. 228 Generic tests were performed on Foxboro power supplies. No formal Cook specific tests are planned.

K. Operation and design of watchdog timers 182d document number HI-280-300 page 13 Page 11 of 17 12/15/92

FILE 0 23 'se of PC A. Describe how the configurator is used. 23C 1B28-docwent number SI 0-00282 B. Be prepared to discuss in detail, provide denonstrations where appropriate, and provide support docunentation where needed for the following topics:

1. Hardware details of the equipment in (1) 1. 23A, page 11, item 57 of purchase order 2 ~ pages A-6, A-7, A-9, and Attachment 1 of CE proposal Configurator originally purchased from CE, but we are using it as needed for Foxboro instrurentation
2. System interface and the affects on the system of the hardware and 23B software of the equipment in (1)
3. Use of passwords and adninistrative controls that will be used at 23C, 230 Cook Nuclear Plant for the equipment in (1)
4. Provide sample copies of surveillance and maintenance/calibration These procedures will not be available until the procedures (Cook Nuclear Plant) that demonstrate the administrative samer of '93 controls and that demonstrate system testing for Technical Specification coapliance
5. How intrusive is the PC board?

Page 12 of 17 12/15/92

FILE NO 24 'oftware A. Licensee Information for the Audit.

1. Software docunentation file for all modules. 24B1, Page 13

- available at Foxboro CES 281

2. Test plan and results of testing for the software modules. 23A2 and 24A3
3. Provide Software Control Procedures AEP GP 2.6, 3.7, 4.4, 15.5 24AB
4. Oescription of the change control procedures for the software modules 24E2 to be used in the upgrade. CES 280 - available at Foxboro
5. Results of acceptance procedures for existing software modules to be 24E1 used in the upgrade.
6. Records of operational experience for existing software modules to be 98 used B. Vendor Information
1. Requirements specification used. CPS 1188 - available at Foxboro CPS 1189 - available at Foxboro
2. Provide descriptions of the vendors control algorithms used for this CPS 1188 - available at Foxboro design application. 182b docunent rasher-HI 280-205
3. Provide the constants used in the system and the old system (gain constants, time constants, lead/lag ratios, etc.

C. Oesign Activity 1 ~ Provide the VEV plan. 24A5

2. Provide the scope and results of static and dynamic tests. 24T1 - draft procedure 24T2 - review of draft procedure
3. The developnent process for existing or procured software modules to 24A4 be used in the upgrade.

Page 13 of 17 12/15/92

FILE NO

4. The procedures used to define the configuration for each replacement control element, and the procedure used.

D. Provide the list of software modules which make up the firmware used 3A - last page in Cook Nuclear Plant upgrade system.

ED Provide information on what problems were encountered during software 24C3 development: how they were discovered, how they were corrected and tested.

F. Provide QA manual on computer software. 24AC G. Provide source listing samples. available at Foxboro H. How will configuration management be controlled. 24E1-how Foxboro controls 23D-how AEP will control I'hat changes have been made in the software since Haddam Neck? 3A

25. Provide the procurement spec/contract. 25
26. The software retest to be done. Provide information on problem 26A audit report (audit report) and how addressed. 24A3-software retest
27. Diversity A. Demonstrate signal path diversity 27C B. How is function diversity provided. The NRC has told us to asswe that a comaon mode software failure occurs during an accident and then detai l how operations can mitigate the consequences of the accident.

C. Provide details of defense in depth. 27B D. Impact on control room indication assuning a failure of the new 278 Foxboro equipment Page 14 of 17 12/15/92

28. Provide description of the HOD 30 scope of work and explain 36C interaction between protection and control.

A. Address how separation is achieved between the Taylor Mod 30 28 instrunents (control) and the new Foxboro instrunents (protection).

29. Provide description and the HI of the 75V power supply to be used 1B2b-docunent number MI -018-180 and how it will be incorporated into the various test docunents, design, 29 etc.
30. Grounding A. Describe the overall grounding, shielding, and isolation for the 308, 138 installed system with clear ground point identification.

B. Provide a description of the vendor grounding requirements as stated 308, 13B in the Licensee System Specification para. 5.7.15 and describe how the plant grounding system designed for low frequency single point application will be adapted for a system with high frequencies (2MHz or more) contained within the cabinets.

31. Installation A. Discuss in detail and provide docunentation and procedures where 318 needed, that support the intended installation and start-up testing of the new equipment and any intended equipment envirorment verification Post installation test procedures being written testing (temp., EHI, RFI, hunidity, etc.).
2. Did out of range test sufficiently cover extremes'18 New surveillance/maintenance procedures are not scheduled to be complete until late 1993/early 1994. The new procedures will be similar to existing procedures located in file location 15C.
3. Do out of range conditions go to failsafe? 318 New surveillance/maintenance procedures are not scheduled to be complete until late 1993/early 1994. The new procedures will be similar to existing procedures located in file location 15C.

Page 15 of 17 12/15/92

32. Lithiun Battery Test and Results A. Provide testing and analysis on the Iithiun batteries (a failure 32A and 328 modes and effects analysis). Their failure could create a fire, a high failure rate, etc.

B. Provide an analysis demonstrating that the addition of 130+ Li 32A and 328 batteries does not present a hazard in the control room. Address the effects of faults, charges/discharges and other failure modes that may result in damage. Identify protective features to be provided.

33. Isolation A. Provide basis for qualification of the electrical isolation devices. 33A Test data for input & output short circuits as well as maxirma voltage shorts to both inputs and outputs to demonstrate no effects or equivalent This report addresses the worse case which is compliance to IEEE 279-1971, Par. 4.7.2. 100VRMS=141.V. The test was done at 480 VRMS.

Hence, both AC and DC were enveloped

34. How aach radiation will equipment in the Control Room be exposed to 25 in the event of an accident page 14 of 22 of 04/03/89 approved spec
35. System Reliability Analysis A. Provide the reliability studies on the Foxboro Spec 200 Micro. 35D and 35C Page 16 of 17 12/15/92
36. Hiscellaneous A. Have the Cook Nuclear Plant FSAR and Technical Specifications UFSAR 35A available during the audit. T/S 35B NRC has copies B. Integrated FAT Procedure 24T1-draft procedure 24T2-review of draft procedure The FAT test report will be available in Hay 1993 C. Has there been a microwave susceptibility study completed at the Cook field strengths: 6C, page 13 of 23, Section Nuclear Plant (location of any microwave stations in the immediate area)? 3.2.1.3 If so what is the field strengths of the local microwave systems close to direction: 6C, page 13 of 23, Section 3.2.1.3 the plant? Mhat is the direction of the translators from the microwave testing: 6C, page 14 of 23, Section 3.2.2 transmission center'? - lf not, why and is there a concern. Mas there testing in microwave range in the vendor's qualification tests?

D. What are the results of the security and susceptibility to micro~ave 6C, pages 13, Section 3.2.1.3 and low magnetic fields studies? Has Cook Nuclear Plant made provisions in this area?

E. Has the cannon model rejection of the system been addressed? If so, 6C, pages 5-8, Section 3 '.2 state the issues that were resolved, and the issues that still pose a possible threat to the system safety? How did Cook Nuclear Plant address the cannon mode rejection in the installed wiring?

F. Mere the power supplies independently surge withstand tested? 60, report'T-220, Section III E Applicability to Cook Nuclear Plant?

G. Mhat was the acceptance criteria used for the Surge Mithstand 6C Capability tests?

H. Mhat were the burn-in requirements used for Spec 200 micro system 25 i.e. infant mortality? - explain page 16 of 22 of 04/03/89 approved spec I. Are there any paging systems located in close proximity to the Spec 6C 200? In any rooms close to the Spec installation?

J. If a PRA was not done for Spec 200, what assurance is there that 278 comnon mode failures have been properly identified 7C and mitigated? Has there been a failure modes and effects analysis performed? - Please provide.

Page 17 of 17 12/15/92

I As of 12/15/92

'DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST The following items are those that the NRC expects to be available for review (after November 30, 1992). These items were identified during the April 21, 1992 meeting at NRR. The items, primary responsible group, and due date are as follows:

1. Background Information A. Functional Drawings Existing - (AEPSC I &C - CM PLT) 2-98501 thru 2-98516
2. New- (Foxboro - CMPLT)

See'Appe*n'de'8

  • 3:,"::"::'-::,:':'":.:Fun'ctioiial.::Req'uirem'ent,:.Summary'.:..'-.,:(AEPSC: I&C'-:-",:CM.PLT)

Rep'ort'No. 2985-'DPS4g.::,-*

B. System Architecture Description

1. Existing
a. Instruction Manuals - (AEPSC I &C - CMPLT)

Foxboro Manuals Volumes I thru /V

b. Simple Block Diagram - (AEPSC I&C - CMPLT)

No Document No.

2. New
a. Ust of Applicable Instruction Manuals - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

No Document no. - Attached as Appendix A

b. Applicable Instruction Manuals- (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

See Appendix A

c. Write General System Description - (Foxboro - CMPLT) 0310-4120 page 1 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

d. Approve General System Description - (AEPSC I8 C - CMPLT)

Repo'rt:No;!2985.-'.NGS43:

e. Simple Block Diagram - (Foxboro - CM PLT)

No document no.

Provide Tl 280-100- (Foxboro - CMPLT)

TI 280-100

g. Provide Tl 280-110 - (Foxboro - CM PLT)

TI 280-110

h. Qualification Test Reports/Procedures- (AEPSC l8C - CMPLT)

See Appendix A C. New module schematics (with instruction manuals - see item 1.B.2.b)

D. Interconnection (Elementary) Drawings

1. Existing - (AEPSC I &C - CM PLT)

See Appendix B

2. New - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

See Appendix F

  • E. Power One-Line Drawings 1 ~ Existing - (AEPSC I8 C - CMPLT)

OP2-12050 OP2-98077

'age OP2-98081 OP2-98085 OP2-98089

2. New - (AEPSC NDG- 4/30/93)

Later F. Project Schedule/ Reports/Action Usts/Etc. - (AEPSC I &C - CMPLT)

No document no.

2 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUM ENTATION TRACKING LIST NT)

G. Approved U2 Set 1 Foxboro Drawings/Complete Set - (AEPSC l8 C - CM PLY)

See Appendix F 8 8

  • H. Approved U2 Set 1 Sys Decrip/ Config Data Base - (AEPSC l8 C - CMPLT)

Foxboro Doc No. TP-150

  • Foxboro Doc No. DB-151 Reg Guides and Standards applicable A. Provide summary in revised RFC packet - (AEPSC I &C - See item 36.C)

RFC 2985 Rev 1 packet Explain how we comply with each and any differences that apply.

Explain existing variances - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-NCF41

2. Explain any new equipment variances - (Foxboro - None Identified/No Specific Action)

C. Describe any special conditions to our license and impact on standards compliance - (AEPSC NS - CMPLT)

Se'e",:RFC,:.DC-."12,-"2S85":p'acket Safety'Review',:Memo':file':36.':C,"

3. Provide a specific comparison to Haddam Neck for both hardware and software A. Update information provided at April 21, 1992 NRC meeting - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

No document number B. Provide applicable Ml's as references (see Item 1.B.2.b) page 3 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

4. Temperature and humidity A. Provide list of available test reports - (CMPLT)

See Appendix A B. Review/approve (including anomaly disposition) available test reports - (AEPSC l8 C - CMPLT)

Report:No.';2985-'HEl=12

  • C. Write supplemental rack heat rise test procedure - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Doc No. HR-210

  • D. Review/approve supplemental rack heat rise test procedure - (AEPSC I&C - CMPLT)

Report No.2985-HEI@9

  • E. Perform/ Issue report supplemental rack heat rise tests - (Foxboro - 12/31/92)

Later F. Review/approve supplemental rack heat rise test report - (AEPSC I8C -1/15/93)

Later G. Write overall environmental evaluation report - (AEPSC I &C - 2/11/93)

Later H. Evaluate heat load added to CR by new equipment - (Include in item 4.6)

Later

5. Seismic A. Provide list of available test reports - (CM PLT)

See Item 1.B.2.h page 4 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

B. Review/ approve (including anomaly disposition) available test reports - (AEPSC I &C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HEI-08 C. Cook specific analysis - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

'rovide Foxboro Report No. 1619 D. Review/approve analysis - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HE/48 Write overall seismic evaluation report - (AEPSC I&C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HE/47

6. EMI/RFI A. Provide available test report 4 88-1033a - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Report No. 88-1033a B. Provide available Radiated Emissions test report - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Report No. 85-1 182A and Addendum C. Review/approve (including anomaly disposition) available test reports - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HE/43 Write supplemental EMII RFI test procedure - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Plan No. 60095-93N and Addendum Foxboro Document IT-220 E. Review/approve supplemental EMII RFI test procedure - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HE/44 F. Perform/ Issue report supplemental EMII RFI tests - (Foxboro - 12/23/92)

Later page 5 of 22 12/ 15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

G. Review/ approve supplemental EM I/ RFI test report - (AEPSC I &C - 1/22/93)

Later H. Complete site survey

1. Define survey test objectives - (AEPSC l8 C - CMPLT)

Non4eliverable

2. Contract for survey services - (AEPSC I8 C - CMPLT)

NonCeliverable

3. Perform survey/ Issue report - (Survey Contractor - CM PLT)

ABB CE Report No. 98689-ICE-37111 ABB CE Report No. 98689-ICE-3782 Rev 00 NTS Report No. 6032-93N

4. Review/ approve site survey test report - (AEPSC I &C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HEI-11

  • Evaluate Taylor MOD 30 EMI/ RFI emissions impact
1. Define test objectives - (AEPSC I8 C - CMPLT)

NonCeliverable

2. Contract for testing services - (AEPSC I8 C - CMPLT)

NonCeliverable

3. Perform Tests at Dolan Lab - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Report dated 11/4/92

4. Perform test/Issue report - (Test Contractor -10/30/92 - RESCHEDUL'E'FOR.:1:2f 31'/92)

Later page 6of22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATION TRACKING LIST T)

5. Review/approve test report - (AEPSC I &C - 11/13/92- RESCHEDULE FOR.01'/18/92)

Later J. V/rite overall EMI/ RFl evaluation report - (AEPSC I &C - 2/26/93)

Later

7. FMEA (Foxboro -11/13/92)

A. Provide preliminary Cook specific analysis - (Foxboro - DELETE - WILL NOT BE ISSUED)

B. Provide comments to analysis- (AEPSC - DELETE - WILL NOT BE ISSUED)

C. Provide Cook specific analysis - (Foxboro - 11/13/92 - CMPLT)

Foxboro Report No. FM-502 Foxboro Report No. FM-503,.".

Foxboro;'Report No.'::92-;'.FM42F-

  • D. Review/approve analysis - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Report,'No.:::2985-.'HE/4.14 E. Provide description of configured failure modes - (Foxboro - Include in Item 7.C)

8. Industry experience data A. List of applications - Nuclear User's ust - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

No document no. - dated 6+2/92- Foxboro xmtl FTAEP418 B, How equipment has been applied - Nuclear User's List - (Included in item 8.A) page 7of22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATlONTRACKINGLlS NT)

C. Hardware and Software experience - Foxboro Reports Q132-1 8 Q1 32 (Foxboro - CM PLT)

Foxboro Report Q732-1 Foxboro Report Q132-2 Foxboro Letter No. FTAEPC59 D. List of similar applications - Nuclear User's List - (Included in item 8.A)

E. Description of formal feedback process for field problemsl failures - (Foxboro -'.CMPLT)

Foxboro Letter No. FTAEP458 F. All experience information/data - NON DELIVERABLE- on file at Foxboro - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

9. Software failures A. Describe how resolved - NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro (also see Item 24.C.1) - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

B. Part 21's - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Letter dated April 1, 1990

10. Hardware failures (other than random)

A. Describe how resolved - NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

B. Part 21's - NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

11. Response time A. Provide worst case time response - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

No document no. - Foxboro xmtl FTAEP420 page 8of22 12/ 15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIS NT)

B. Prepare acceptability report - (AEPSC I &C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HE/41 *

12. Setpoints A. ECP's evaluating new equipment vs old - (AEPSC I&C - CMPLT)

EG-IC-004 '-RPC-04

  • 2-RPC-08 12-RPC-17

'-RPC-05

  • 12-RPC-10 '-2-00-15 * '2-RPC-01 2-RPC-02 2-RPC-06 '2-RPC-12 2-RPC-03 '-RPC-07 2-RPC-15
  • B. Determine acceptability of existing T.S. allowable values - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Report;No;:;:298&SKF;;.01>

C. Provide accuracy data (or list of documents with necessary info) - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro xmt/ FTAEP-018

13. Electrostatic Discharge A. Provide reports - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Same asitems 6.B B. Provide evaluation of lightning strike effects - (AEPSC l&C - see Item 30.B)

Include in Grounding Study C. Include ESD precautions in Plant procedures (provide sample procedure or guidance for future inclusion) - (AEPSC I &C-CM PLT)

Memo dated 11+0/92 D. Perform Site Testing - (AEPSC/I&C - No Specific Action Required) page 9 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

14. Training A. Explain training program for technicians and operations - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

No Document No.

15. Procedures A. Provide list of impacted plant procedures - (AEPSC I8 C - CMPLT)

See Appendix C Provide procedures that govern design change/plant procedure reviews - (AEPSC I&C - CMPLT)

GP 3.1

  • NEP 3.1
  • C. Provide representative sample of EOP's, Annunciator Response Procedures, and IMP's - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

See Appendix C, Appendix D and Appendix E D. EQ Review Guidelines - (AEPSC I &C - CMPLT)

Guideline EG-IC405

16. Describe impact on other issues - primarily Reg Guide 1.97- (AEPSC I &C -.CM.f? L<T)

ReportrNo.'-':,'2985-'NGS4f;: *

17. Explain AMSAC impact RFC 3104 packet - (AEPSC I&C - CMPLT)

RFC 3104 packet

  • page 10 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

18. Station blackout effects A. Temperature
1. Provide calc on CR temperatures - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Calculation OCCHV12TA07N

2. Provide cabinet heat rise report - See items 4.C and 4.D B. Battery loading (include with item 22 deliverables)
1. Provide loading data - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Later

2. Provide evaluation report - (AEPSC l&C - Include with Item 22.8)
19. Describe impact on bypass/trip indications, if any - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Note: There is no impact - no deliverable.

20. Provide errata sheets and evaluations of generic chip problems - (Foxboro - CM PLT)

Foxboro Letter No. FTAEP470

21. Write evaluation of microwave and radar susceptibility - (AEPSC I &C - Include in Item 6.C)

Note: Eventually to be included in item 6.J.

22. Power A. Provide Inverter loading evaluation - new vs old equipment - (AEPSC I &C - Include in Item 22.B) page 11 of 22 12/15/92

0 DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIS NT)

Provide power quality evaluation as applied to spec 200- (AEPSC I&C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HEI-06

  • Provide power requirement specifications - (Foxboro - GMPLT)

Same asitem 1.B.1.a Provide loading data - (see item 18.B.1)

Provide LER's on GRID power failures at Cook - (AEPSC NS - CMPLT)

LER No. 88411 LER No. 89414 PR Mo. 86414 PR No.87-139 PR Mo. 88444 PR No.88-673 PR No. 88-?50 PR No.89-720 PR No.89-946 PR No. 89-1355 PR Mo. 90-1006 PR No. 90-1041 Provide 120VAC table of connections - (Foxboro - CM PLT)

D'oc'ident,'Mo,"AC-'.,'100, general existing instrumentation cabIe tray specifications - (AEPSC I &C - CMPLT)

'rovide DCCEE-605QCN DC CPS-188CCM DCCPSC 12-QCN DC CPS-603-QCM Dedication Plan DD 1023 page 12 of 22 12/ 15/ 92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

Provide Electrical Physical Drawings of Control Room area- (AEPSC I &C - CMPLT) 2-1440 2-1453 2-1446 2-1454 2-1446B 2-1455 2-1452 2-1455A I. Provide review of aging effects on inverter and surge suppressor - (AEPSC l&C - Include in Item 22.B)

23. Use of PC A. Provide Purchase Order - (AEPSC I&C - CMPLT)

AEPSC/CE Contract C-7756 CE P.O. No. 9084709 (Buisinessland)

B. Provide Description on intrusiveness to the process instruments - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Letter No. FTAEP-051 C. Provide policies/procedures on the use and control of the PC as configurator - (AEPSC I8 C - CMPLT)

MHl 6030 (draft)

  • D. Provide policies/procedures onthe control ofconfiguration data- (AEPSC 18C- CMPLT)

Policy Statement dated 1/29/90 NESP 19.04 Rev 3 PM/ 5042 page 13 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

24. Software A. System Design, Verification and Validation Summary (conformance to ANSI/ IEEE 7-4.3.2)
1. Provide new Software Test Plan No. ED2134- (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Software Test Plan No. ED2 134

2. Provide new Software Test Report No. 92-9024- (Foxboro - CM PLT)

Foxboro Software Test Report No. 92-9024

3. Review/approve New Foxboro Software Test Report No. 92-9024- (AEPSC QA - CMPLT)

Memo dated 11/12/92

4. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE02 Rev A - (AEPSC QA - CMPLTq)

Foxboro report QOAAE02 Rev A Foxboro report QOAAE01 Rev A Foxboro report QOAAE04 Rev A Memo dated 10/8/92 Provide ANSI 7-4.3.2 Compliance Document - (AEPSC QA - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HHH41 B. Software V&VPlan and Summary

1. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE03 Rev B - (AEPSC QA - CMPLT)

Foxboro report QOAAE03 Rev B Memo dated 10/8/92 C. Software Validation Basis

1. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE05 Rev A - (AEPSC QA - CMPLT)

Foxboro report QOAAE05 Rev A Memo dated 10/8/92

2. Review/approve New Foxboro Software Test Report No. 92-9024- (included in item 24.A.3) page 14 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIS NT)

3. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE05 Rev B - (AEPSC QA - CMPLT)

Foxboro report QOAAE05 Rev B Memo dated 11/12/92 D. Software QA plan for integration of hardware/software

1. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE03 Rev B - (included in item 24.B.1)

E. Configuration Management/ Software Changes/ Error Reporting

1. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE06 Rev A- (AEPSC QA- CMPLT)

Foxboro report QOAAE06 Rev A

2. Make available Foxboro internal document CQA 3.3.1 (revised per AEPSC audit) - NON DELIVERABLE- on file at Foxboro - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro document CQA 3.3.1 F. Software Development Plan

1. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE03 Rev 8 - (included in item 24.B.1)

G. Software Functional Requirements for Unit 2 Protection Set 1

1. Provide Functional Drawings - (included in item 1.A.1)
2. Provide ECP 2-05 (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

ECP 24541 H. Details on Software Bugs, Hardware Failures, and Part 21 Reports

1. Software Bugs - Review/ approve available Foxboro report QOAAE05 Rev B - (included in item 24.C.1)
2. Post development Hardware failures - Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE05 Rev B - (included in item 24.C.1)
3. Part 21's - Specific reports available - (Included in item 10.B) page 15 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

Software Design Standards, Specifications and Requirements

1. Listed in QOAAE03 Rev B - Specific documents available - NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro-(Foxboro - CM PLT)

J. System Design Requirements and Specifications

1. Listed in QOAAE03 Rev B - Specific documents available - NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro-(Foxboro - CM PLT)

K. Software Design Performance Specifications

1. Listed in QOAAE03 Rev B - Specific documents available - NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro-(Foxboro - CMPLT)

L. Software Coding Standards

1. Listed in Foxboro internal document CES 281:19- NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro - (Foxboro-CM PLT)

M. Software Configuration Requirements

1. Listed in Foxboro internal documents CES 281:14 and CES 281:15- NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro - (Foxboro - CMPLT)
2. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE06 Rev A - (include in item 24.E.1)

Software Configuration Management Plan Usted in Foxboro internal document CES 281:1 - NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro - (Foxboro-CM PLT)

2. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE06 Rev A - (include in item 24.E.1)

O. Software Configuration Validation Review Report

1. Review/approve available Foxboro report QOAAE06 Rev A - (include in item 24.E.1)
p. Software Test Plan
1. Provide new Software Test Plan No. ED2134- (included in item 24.A.1) page 16 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

Q. Software Verification Problem Reports

1. Provide available code walkthroughs - NON DELIVERABLE- reports on file at Foxboro - (Foxboro - CM PLT)

R. Software Validation Problem Reports

1. Provide new Software Test Report No. 92-9024 - (included in item 24.A.2)

S. Software Problem Reports (Generic, Module Level, Units Level) 1 ~ Described in Foxboro report QOAAE05 Rev B - (included in item 24.C.1)

T. Factory Acceptance Test Report

1. Provide Unit 2 Protection Set 1 procedure - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Document No. TP-150

2. Review/approve procedure - (AEPSC I&C - CMPL'T)

Letter.:."No".:;.'FOX-:,92446

3. Provide test results - (Foxboro - 5/30/93)

Later U. Software Reliability

1. Evaluation provided in available Foxboro report QOAAE03 Rev B - (included in item 24.B.1)

V. Software Modules/ Subroutines, etc.

1. Provide Core Utilization Map - NON DELIVERABLE- Reports on file at FOXBORO (Foxboro - CMPLT)

W. Timing

1. Provide a software timing breakdown - NON DELIVERABLE-Reports on file at FOXBORO (Foxboro - CMPLT)

X. Compiler 1 ~ Provide a description (use available documents) - NON DELIVERABLE-Reports on file at FOXBORO (Foxboro-CMPLT) page 17 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIS NT)

Y. Al D converter

1. Provide a description - NON DELIVERA8LE- on file at Foxboro - (Foxboro - CMPLT) foxboro internal Document CPS 1182 Z. Virus
1. Address potential impact - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Letter No. FTAEP450 AA. Perform Internal Software QA Audit - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro m'emo.'dated';12/1/92 AB. Software Control Procedures - (AEPSCI I&C - CM PLT)

GP 2.6 GP 3.7 GP 4.4 GP 15.5 AC. Foxboro QA Manual - (AEPSC/I &C - CM PLT)

Foxboro Manual CQA-2 Rev. G Foxboro Manual EQ1400 Rev. C

25. Provide the procurement speci contract - (AEPSC I&C - CM PLT)

AEPSC/Foxboro Contract C-8741 AEPSC Spec DCC-IC-500<CN Rev 0

26. The software retest to be done - provide information on problem (audit report) and how addressed A. Provide audit report - (AEPSC QA - CMPLT)

QA Trip Report No. V-1079 dated 4/3/92 page 18 of 22 12I 15I 92

DOCUM ENTAT10N TRACKlNG 11S NT)

27. Diversity A. Define (to AEPSC NS) What instrumentation effected and how effected - (AEPSC 1&C - CMPLT)

AEPSC memo dated 10+9/92 B. Explain how each handled per each FSAR Chapter 14 transient assuming common mode software failure of RPS - (AEPSC NS - CMPLT)

Rep'ort No 2985-VDV41-

  • Calculation,'No.,OA-92-.:,;18 Document functional diversity review - (AEPSC I&C - CMPL'T)

Report No.':2985-WGS42,:",",,

WCAP,-',:7806

28. Provide description of the MOD 30 scope of work and explain interaction between Protection and Control - (AEPSC l&C-

'CMP,LT)

Report No. 2985-WJE41

29. Provide description and the Ml of the 75V power supply to be used and how it will be incorporated into the various test documents, design, etc - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Ml 018418 Foxboro Qual Doc QOAAA20 (Section 4)

30. Grounding A. Provide the requirements (drawings and Ml's) - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Report No.2985-HEI@2 Foxboro Drawings 92F12687-PWR-2101 Through 2104 See Appendix H page 19 of 22 12/ 15I92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIST T)

B. Provide report and drawings on how it will be done and an evaluation - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Report No.2985-HEI@2 Describe who is coordinating the work - DELETE,.-,-Not a deliverable)

D. Describe any checks to be done for ground faults. Describe what was done - (AEPSC I &C - CM PLT)

No document no.

31. Installation A. Provide description of who is doing the work - (AEPSC I&C - DELETED FROM LIST - Not a Deliverable)

B. List/ provide any tests and procedures - (AEPSC I8 C - CM PLT) 12 IHP 603Q IMP.Q59 2 IHP 4030 STP.100A C, ':-.:Test Program Summary.-'-,"(AEPSC I&C--'CMPLT)

Report-No; 2985-'BJB41 Note: New Surveillance/ Maintenance Procedures are not scheduled to be complete until late 1993/early 1994. The new procedures will be similar to existing procedures located in file location 15.C.

32. Lithium Battery Test and Results A. Provide test report - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Document No. BT-180A B. Review and approve test report - (AEPSC I &C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985&El-10 page 20 of 22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATIONTRACKING LIS NT)

33. Isolation A. Provide test report - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Test Report No. 924029a Foxboro Test procedure Document No. IT-140 B. Review and approve test report - (AEPSC I&C - CMPLT)

Report No. 2985-HE/-13 *

34. Radiation A. Provide TID requirement - (AEPSC I8 C - CMPLT)

In AEPSC Spec DCC-IC-500-QCN Rev 0

35. System Reliability Analysis (MTBF)

A. Provide preliminary Cook Specific Analysis - (Foxboro - DELETE - WILLNOT BE ISSUED)

B. Provide comments on analysis- (AEPSC I&C -10/16/92- DELETE - WILLNOT BE ISSUED)

C. Provide Cook Specific Analysis - (Foxboro - CMPLT)

Foxboro Report No. 924'A-50F

  • Foxboro Report No. 92@A-66F; D. analysis - (AEPSC I &C -:CMPLT)

'eview/approve Report No. 2985-HEI-15

  • page 21 of22 12/15/92

DOCUMENTATION TRACKlNG LIST T)

36. Miscellaneous A. Provide UFSAR- (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

UFSAR - In file by reference B. Provide Tech Specs - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

Unit 2 Tech Specs - In file by reference C. Provide RFC packet - (AEPSC l&C - CMPLT)

RFC DC-72-2985 Rev 0 and Rev 1 Packet

  • D. Other Applicable Procedures - (AEPSC I8 C - CMPLT)

GP 4.0 NEP 3.0 NEP 4.0 GP 5.2 NEP 3.4 NEP 5.2 GP5.6 NEP3.5 NEP5.6 GP 7.1 NEP3.9 NEP 64 GP 15.1 Notes and Clarifications:

1. Only Unit 2 Protection Set 1 will be totally ready for audit by 11/30/92
2. Primary responsible group is the group performing the actual task. It does not denote reviewing groups or other end users.

Updatable documentation 2985ATT.A4 page 22 of 22 12/15/92

APPENDIX A Foxboro SPEC 200/SPEC 200 MICRO Documentation List Model No. ual Doc No. MI/SI No. Assoc Mod N-2AI-C2L QOAAB15 2AI-100 N-2AI-H2V QOAAA06 2AI-130 N-2AI-I2V N-2AI-I2V QOAAB35 2AI-135 N-2AI-P2V(C) 1-01878 ** 1-01878 N-2AI-P2V N-2AI-P2V QOAAB29 2AI-185 N-2AI-T2V QOAAB28 2AI-172 N-2AX+VE QOAAA06 2AI-172 N-2AX+P N-2AX+P(C) 1-01833 ** 1-01833 N-2AX+P N-2AX+P QOAAB21 N-2CCA-S QOAAB69 280-300 0-00282 N-2CCA-D QOAAB69 280-"300 0-00282 N-2AO-L2C-R(C) 1-01830 ** 1-01830 N-2AO-L2C-R QOAAB34 2AO-113 QOAAB60 N-2AO-V2H QOAAA06 2AO-120 N-2AO-VAI N-2AO-V2H(C) TO BE ISSUED TO BE ISSUED N-2AO-V2H N-2AO-VAI QOAAB17 N-2AX+DP11 QOAAB69 280-315 N-2AX=DP10-E QOAAA06 2AX-202 N-2AX+DP10 N-2AK+DP10 QOAAB14 N-2ANU-DM QOAAB69 2AN-105 N-2ARPS05 QOAAA37 PART 2 2AR-103 P0300CQ QOAAA20 PART 4 018-180 TEST PANEL QOAAA20 PART 4 WIRING QOAAB61 General QOAAA01 QOAAA02 QOAAA04 PARTS 1-4 QOAAA05 QOAAA08 QOAAA20 PARTS 1-4, Appx A QOAAA24 QOAAA39 QOAAA40 QOAAB01 QOAAB58 Indicates modules used on project. Modules not marked are basis for similarity for associated modules. See QOAAA06.

Filed with MI/SI's.

Unit 2 Loop Dmwinm 2 LD 001 2 LD 021 2-M~-042 2-M-0 a 2- D-002 2 LD G22 2-M~-043 2-M-056 2-LD-003 2-~-023 2-M~-044 2-LD-057 2-M-004 2-M-026 2-~M-045 2-~~-058 2- D-011 2-~-027 2-~~-046 2-M-077 2- D-012 2-~-029 2-~~-047 2-~-078 2-LD-013 2-M~-039 2 LD 048 2-M-079 2-LD-014 2-~-040 2-LD-049 2-M-080 2- D-020 2-M-041 2-M-051 2- D-081 2 LD 082 2-~-GS3 Elementa~ Drawizirs OP-2-98338-10 OP-2-98546-8 OP-2-98575-6 9S426-16 98550-6 98576-5 98447-4 98""-'-6 98577-9 98452-7 98552-7 9857S-8 98454-7 98553-8 98579-4 98541-3 98567-11 98580-5 98542-12 98571-12 98584-9 54 -6 98572-6 98588-6 98544 7 98573-23 98592-2

'8545-7 98574-3 98~""3-5 98cc6

oceDures Recruired for RZC-2985 Unit 2 - Protec ion Set 1 2 ZHP 6030 Z~.194 Rev. 11 199, Rev. 09 204, Rev. 08 208, Rev. 08 211, Rev. 08 212, Rev. 08 215, Rev. 09 2" 9, Rev. 04 223 Rev. 07 256, Rev. 06 265 r Rev. 02 267, Rev. 02 400, Rev. 02 401, Rev. 02 2 ~~ 4030 STP 10K,I Rev. 03 104, Rev. 12 108, Rev. 08 111, Rev. 08 1 o / Rev. 04 119. Rev. 08 120, Rev. 07 Rev. 05

EHDEAHA MECHEGAH POWER COMPAHY DOHALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT EMERGENCY OPERATEHG PROCEDURE OG ERG MOG ER IHDEX REV. HO.

PROCFDURE NUMBER (ETLE

+*x**********x*****+*****~******~ EFF DATE COMMENTS

+ix'x***4**x*x****M*****Xxxx~

02-OHP 4023.E-O REACTOR TRiP OR SAFETY REV. 5 CS 1 - 3 INJECTION 11-07-91 02-OHP 4023.ES-O.O RED IAGHOS I S REV.

05-19-89 02-OHP 4023. ES-0.1 REACTOR TRIP RESPONSE REV. 5 04-13-92 02-OHP 4023.ES-O.Z NATURAL CIRCULATION COOLDOMN REV. 2 CS 1 09-07-90 02-OHP 4023.ES-0.3 NATURAL CIRCULATION CQOLDOWH REV. 1 CS 1 - 2 M/STEAM VOID IN VESSEL 05-19-89 (M/RVLIS) 02-OHP 4023.ES-0.4 NATURAL CIRCULATION COOLDQWN REV. 1 CS 1 M/STEAN VOID IN VESSEL 05-19-89 (M/0 RVLIS) 02-OHP 4023.ECA-O.O

~ ~ LOSS OF ALL AC POWER REV. 6 05-22-92 02-QHP 4023.ECA-O.1 LOSS OF ALL AC POMER RECOVERY REV. 4 WITHQUT SI RE(UIRED 05-22-92 02-OHP 4023.ECA-0.2 LOSS QF ALL AC POMER RECOVERY REV. 3 M/SI RE(UIRED 05-22-92 02-OHP 4023.E-l LOSS OF REACTOR OR SECONDARY REV. 5 Cs 1 COOLANT 10-30-91 02-OHP 4023.ES-l.l S I TERHIHATIOH REV. 3 05-05-92 02-OHP 40Z3. ES-1.2 POST LOCA COOLDQWN AHD REV. 3 CS 1 - 2 DEPRESSURI EAT IQH 09-07-90 02-OHP 4023.ES-1.3 TRANSFER TO COLD LEG REV. 1 Cs 1 - 3 RECIRCULATION 05-19-89 02-OHP 40Z3.ES-1.4 TRANSFER TQ HOT LEG REV. 1 REC IRCULATION 05-19-89

~T OP RATlOHS D Paar I M=-v 2> 1

INDIANA NICHIGAH POMER CONPANY OOHALD C. COOK HUCLEAR PLANT EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE MOB ERG INDEX REV. HO.

PROCEDURE HUNBER . TITLE EFF DATE CONHEHTS

                                  • 4'****** **********+**+x%'x+x'*xo'zx****+*X*+*****%'**%'****x%'%'***+%4*'HHc**

02-OHP'023. ECA-I. 1 LOSS OF EMERGENCY COOLANT REV. 3 REC IRCULATION 10-30-91 02-QHP 4023.ECA-1.2 LOCA OUTS IDE COHTAINMEHT REY. 1 05-19-89 02-OHP 4023.E-Z FAULTEO STEAM GENERATOR REY. 1 ISQLATiON 05-19-89 02-OHP 4023.ECA-2.1 UNCONTROLLED OEPRESSURIZATIQN REV. 4 CS 1 OF ALL STEAM GEHERATQRS 01-31-91 02-OHP 4023. E-3 STEAM GEHERATQR TUBE RUPTURE REV. 3 CS 1 01-17-91 02-OHP 4Q23.ES-3.1 POST-SGTR COOLDOWN USING REY. 5 BACKFILL 05-05-92 02-QHP 4023.ES-3.2 POST-SGTR COOLOOMH USING REY. 3 BLQMOOMN 09-07-90 02-OHP 4023.ES-3.3 POST-SGTR CQOLOOMH USING REV. 4 STFAMDUMP 09-07-90 02-OHP 4023.ECA-3.1 SGTR M/LOSS OF R.ACTOR REV. 2 CS 1 - 2 COOLANT - SUBCOOLED RECOYERY 08-31-90 DESIRED 02-OHP 4023.ECA-3.2 SGTR M/LQSS OF REACTOR COOLANT REV. 2 CS 1

- SATURATED RECOYERY DESiRED 09-07-90 02.-0HP 4023.ECA-3.3 SGTR M/0 PRESSURIZER PRESSURE REV. 2 CS 1 - 2 CONTROL 09-0?-90 02-QHP 4023.F-O. 1 SUBCRIT I CAL ITY REY. 1 06-23-89 02-OHP 4023.F-0.2 CORE COOLING REV. 2 08-31-90 02-OHP 4023.F-0.3 HEAT SINK REV. 1 CS 1 06-23-89 OP""RATlONS,O("=PT.

(o9 il~~

9 CON (RO( L:-D COPY Paae 2 1

'I ~

INDIANA MICHIGAN POKER COMPANY DOHALD C. COOK HUCLEAR PLANT EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE WOG ERG INDEX REY. HO.

PROCEDURE NUMBER TITLE EFF DATE COMMENTS

        • +*******X*+ x**~4***x+*x*x x***xxx xxxx x*x********W************x x x x**XxX***x X**xx r 02-OHP 4023.F-0.4 INTEGRITY REY. 1 CS 1 09-25-89.

02-OHP 4023.F-0.5 COHTAINMEHT REV. 1 02-01-90 02-OHP 4023.F-Q.6 IHYEHTORY REV. 0 05-30-86 02-OHP 4023.FR-S.l RESPONSE TO NUCLEAR POWER REV. 5 GENERATION/ATMS 05-20-92 02-OHP 4023.FR-S.2 RESPONSE TO LOSS OF CORE REV. 2 SHUTDOWN 06-11-91 02-OHP 4023.FR-C.1 RESPOHSE TO INADEtlUATE CORE REV. 3 COOLING 09-07-90 02-OHP 4023.FR-C.2 RESPOHSE TO DEGRADE CORE REV. 2 COOLING 09-13-90 02-OHP 4023.FR-C.3 RESPONSE TO SATURATED CORE REY. 1 COOLING 05-19-89 02-OHP 4023.FR-H. 1 RESPONSE TO LOSS OF SECONDARY REV. 5 CS 1 - 4 HEAT SINK 06-28-91 02-OHP 4023.FR-H.2 RESPONSE TO STEAM GENERATOR REY. 2 OYERPRESSUR IZATION 08-31-90 02-OHP 4023.FR-H.3 RESPONSE TO STEAM GENERATOR REY. 2 HIGH LEVEL 08 31 90 02-OHP 4023.FR-H.4 RESPONSE TO LOSS OF NORMAL REY. 2 STEAM RELEASE CAPAEILITIES 08-31-90 02-OHP 4023.FR-H.5 RESPONSE TO STEAM GENERATOR REY. 2 LOM LEYEL 01-09-91 02-OHP 4023.FR-P.I RESPONSE TO IMMIHEHT REV. 3 CS 1 PRESSURIZED THERMAL SHOCK 10-30-91 COND ITIOH OpERATIONS DEpT.

,S,P,Y

<~ 1992 Page 3 CONTROLLED COPY r1 jQCP

0 INDIANA MICHIGAN POMER COMPANY DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE HOG ERG INDEX REY. NQ.

PROCEDURE HUMSER TITLE EFF DATE COMMENTS,.

    • *****~'k**++'k*****x'*****'x'x***'R'k*'0+******o'x
    • 4'********+*********+++*4'****~***************

02-OHP 4023.FR-P.2 RESPONSE TO ANITICPATED REV. 2 PRESSURIZED THERMAL SHOCK 08-31-90 CONDITON 02-OHP 4023.FR-Z.1 RESPONSE TO HIGH - HIGH REY. 2 CS 1-3 COHTAINMEHT PRESSURE 02-28-92 02-OHP 4023.FR-Z.2 RESPONSE TO COHTAIHMEHT REV. 1 FLOODING 05-19-89 02-OHP 4023.FR-Z.3 RESPONSE TO CONTAINMEHT REY. 1 CS 1 RADIATION LEYEL 05-19-89 02-OHP 4023. FR-I.1 RESPONSE TO HIGH PRESSURIZER REV. 2 CS1-2 LEVEL Ql-Q9-91 02-OHP 4023.FR-I.2 RESPONSE TO LOM PRESSURIZER REY. 1 CS 1 LEYEL 05-19-89 02-OHP 4023. FR-I.3 RESPONSE TO YOIDS IN REV. 3 CS 1 REACTOR YESSEL 11-14-90 02-OHP 4023.SUPPS SUPPLEMENT REY. 1 11-07-91 02-OHP 4023.FOLDOUT FOLDOUT PAGES REV. 2 CS 1 02-21-92 OpcPPTlOZS O=eT h',AY 2~ la9P.

CONTROLL"D GOPY M y, Pace f

4 2

INDIANA MICHIG'N PQMER CQMPAHY DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLAHT ANNUNCIATOR RESPONSE PROCEDURE INDEX REY. Na.

EFF DATE COMMENTS

  • ++++~****~*****+++++++*******************+*************+******~++***** W~*~"

12-OHP 4024.127 ANNUNCIATOR r'12? RESPOHSE: REY 3 CS 1 - 4 LIQUID AHD MISCELLANEOUS MASTE 03-13-89 12-OHP 4024.129 PLANT HEATIHG BOILER REY. 3 ANNUHC IATOR 12-14-89

'12-QHP 4024.134 ANNUHC IATOR r134 RESPOHSE'PENT REV. 2 CS1-2 FUEL PIT 11-12-8?

12-OHP 4024.135 AHHUNCEATOR -. 135 RESPONSE: REY. 3 CS1- 3 ICE CONOEHSER REFRIGERATIOH 02-01-90 SUBPAHEL ELECTRO-LARH 12-OHP 4Q24.139 ANNUNCIATOR r139 REV. 2 'CS1- 5 Q6-05-89 RESPONSE'BERLIHE RADIATIOH MONITORING SYSTEM 12-OHP 4024.140 ANNUNCIATOR i140 RESPONSE: REV. 0 SEMAGE TREATMENT 06-20-91 12-OHP 4024. 141 ANNUNCIATOR F 141 RESPOHSE: REY. 2

'TSC-UPS 06-26-89 02-OHP 4024.201 ANNUNCIATOR F201 RESPONSE: REY. 5 PLANT FERE SYSTEM 05-13-92 02-OHP 4024.202 AN NUNC IATOR z 202 RESPONSE REV. 2 CS 1 5 AREAS FIRE 'ISCELLANEOUS 03-27-89 SYSTEM QZ-OHP 4024.203 ANHUNCEATOR f203 REY. 3 CS 1- 7 RESPONSE'ENTILATION 02-15-89 QZ-OHP 4024.204 AHHUNCIATOR =204 RESPONSE: REY. 2 CS 1 - 12 ESSENTIAL SERVICE MATER AHD 02-15-89 COMPONEHT COOLING 02-OHP 4024.205 ANNUNCIATOR :205 RESPONSE: REV. 4 CS 1- 7 COHTAINMEHT SPRAY 01-09-89 02-OHP 4024.206 ANNUNCIATOR 8206 RESPONSE: REY. 4 CS 1 5

~

RESIDUAL HEAT RFMOVAL 04-26-90 OpFRATtO'>> D-"

T'UN0 Page 1 9 1992 June 10, 1992 C

INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT ARRURCIATGR RESPGNSE ~PRGCEGUR ~IREE REV. HO.

PROCEDURE NUMBER TITLE EFF DATE COMMENTS

~+~**%***%*****TR****~SR'~t++++m*~****Srk++~~lrk~~ ~

02-OHP 4024.207 ANNUNCIATOR ="'207 RESPONSE: REY. 3 CS 1 - 12 REACTOR COOLANT 02-15-89 02-OHP 4024.208 ANNUNCIATOR r 208 REY. 3 CS1-3 RESPOHSE'RESSURIZER 02-06-89 02-OHP 4024.209 ANNUNCIATOR z209 RESPONSE'ORIC REY. 3 CS1-4 ACID 02-06-89 02-OHP 4024.210 ANNUNCIATOR F210 RESPONSE: REY. 4 CS I - 8 FLUX ROD 12-13-90 02-OHP 4024.211 ANNUNCIATOR i211 RESPOHSE: REV. 4 CS1-9 DELTA T 02-15-89 02-OHP 4024.212 ANNUNCIATOR 8212 RESPONSE: REY. 3 . CS 1 7 UNIT 02-13-89 02-OHP 4024.213 ANNUNCIATOR 8213 RESPOHSE: REV. 4 CS1-3 STEAH GEHERATOR 1 AND 2 01-16-89 02-OHP 4024.214 ANNUNCIATOR ~214 RESPOHSE: REV. 3 CS1-2 STEAM GENERATOR 3 AHD 4 01-09-89 02-OHP 4024.215 ANHUHCIATOR ~215 RESPONSE: REY. 3 CS 1 - 10 FEEDMATER 02-13-89 02-OHP 4024.216 ANHUHCIATOR:216 RESPONSE: REY. 2 CS 1 - 10 CONDENSATE 02-15-89 02-OHP 4024..217 ANNUNCIATOR =217 RESPOHSE: REY. 3 CS 1-5 TURBINE 01-09-89 02-OHP 4024.218 ANNUNCIATOR f218 RESPONSE: REY. 3 CS 1 - 12 MAIN AHD FPT 02-13-89 02-OHP 4024.219 ANNUNCIATOR f219 REV. 4 CS 1 - 16 02-15-89 RESPOHSE'TATION AUXILIARYAB 02-OHP 4024.220 AHNUNCIATOR r220 RESPONSE. REV. 4 CS 1 - 18 STATION AUXILIARY "CD" 02-15-89 02-OHP 4024.221 ANNUNCIATOR ~221 RESPOHSE: REY. 3 CS I - 12 GEHERATOR 02-15-89 D

Page 2 June l0, 1992 JUNO g 1gcg

INDIANA MICHIGAN POMER COMPANY DOHALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLAHT ANNUNCIATOR RESPONSE PROCEDURE ~IND REY. HO.

PROCEDURE NUMBER

~~~~~*********++~~~~*~~~%~*+

TITLE EFF DATE COMMEHTS w-02-OHP 4024.222 ANNUNCIATOR 8222 RESPOHSE:

PLOT SERYICE REV. 3 02-15-89

'S 1 - 14 02-OHP 4024.223 ANNUNCIATOR 8223 RESPONSE: REY. 3 CS1-3 CIRCULATING MATER 02-15-89 02-OHP 4024.224 ANNUNCIATOR f224 RESPOHSE: REY. 2 CS1-2 COHTAINHEHT 02-15>>89 02-OHP 4024.226 ANNUNCIATOR f226 SOUTH REV. 2 RADIOACTIVE HASTE EVAPORATOR 11-09-90 02-QHP 4024.238 ANNUNCIATOR 8238 RESPONSE: REY. 2 CS 1 - 3 RADIATIOH MONITORING SYSTEM 03-22-91

{)pERAT10i~S ~"=. T Page 3 Jug 0 8 )0~2 June 10 1992 C 'i ~ ~ ~

pt'I

APPENDIX F Foxboro Untt 2 Drawing List DRAWING NO REV NO SHEET NO STATUS 92F12687-AD-0001 00 Unre viewed 92F12687-AD-0001 00 Unreviewed 92F12687-AD-0001 00 Unreviewed 92F12687-M D-0001 01 A 92F12687-M D-0002 01 AN 92F12687-M D-2101 01 A 92F12687-MD-2102 01 A 92F12687-M D-2103 01 A 92F'I 2687-M D-2104 01 A 92F1 2687-SA-0001 01 A 92F12687-CD-2101 01 A 92F12687-CD-2101 01 A 92F12687-CD-2101 01 A 92F12687-CD-2101 01 A 92F12687-CD-2101 01 A 92F12687-CD-2101 01 A 92F12687-CD-2101 01 A 92F12687-CD-2101 01 A 92F12687-CD-2101 01 A 92F12687-P W-2101 01 A 92F12687-P W-2101 01 AN 92F12687-PW-2101 00 A 92F12687-P WR-2101 01 AN 92F12687-PWR-2101 00 AN 92F12687-CD-2102 01 A 92F12687-CD-2102 01 A 92F12687-CD-2102 01 A 92F12687-CD-2102 01 A 92F12687-CD-2102 01 A 92F12687-CD-2102 01 A 92F12687-CD-2102 01 A 92F12687-CD-2102 01 A 92F12687-CD-2102 01 A

APPENDIX F Foxboro Unit 2 Drawhg Lht - (cont'd)

DRAWING NO REV NO SHEET NO STATUS 92F12687-P W-2102 01 A 92F12687-PW-2102 01 AN 92F12687-P W-2102 00 A 92F12687-PWR-2102 01 AN 92F12687-PWR-2102 00 AN 92F12687-CD-2103 01 A 92F12687-CD-2103 01 A 92F12687-CD-2103 01 A 92F12687-CD-2103 01 A 92F12687-CD-2103 01 A 92F12687-CD-2103 01 A 92F1 2687-CD-2103 01 A 92F'I 2687-CD-2103 01 A 92F12687-CD-2103 01 A 92F12687-P W-2103 01 A 92F12687-PW-2103 01 AN 92F12687-PW-2'f 03 01 A 92F12687-P WR-2103 01 AN 92F12687-P WR-2103 00 AN 92F12687-CD-2104 01 A 92F12687-CD-2104 01 A 92F12687-CD-2104 01 A 92F12687-CD-2104 01 A 92F12687-CD-2104 01 A 92F12687-CD-2104 01 A 92F12687-CD-2104 01 A 92F12687-CD-2104 01 A 92F12687-CD-2104 01 A 92F12687-P W-2104 01 A 92F12687-P W-2104 01 AN 92F12687-P W-2104 00 A 92F12687-P WR-2104 01 AN

APPENDIX G Foxpro Unft 2 Drawing Ust DRAWING NO REV NO SHEET NO STATUS 92F12687-R L-2101 02 A 92F12687-R L-2101 00 A 92F12687-RL-2102 02 A 92F'j 2687-R L-2102 00 A 92F'I 2687-RL-2103 02 A 92F12687-R L-2103 00 A 92F12687-RL-2104 02 A 92F12687-FD-2101 02 A 92F12687-FD-2101 02 A 92F'j 2687-FD-2101 02 A 92F12687-FD-2'I 01 02 A 92F12687-FD-2101 02 A 92F12687-FD-2101 03 A 92F12687-FD-2102 02 A 92F12687-FD-2102 03 A 92F12687-FD-2102 02 A 92F12687-FD-2102 03 A 92F12687-FD-2103 03 A 92F12687-FD-2103 02 A 92F12687-FD-2103 02 A 92F12687-FD-2103 03 A 92F12687-FD-2104 03 A 92F12687-FD-2104 03 A 92F'I 2687-FD-2104 02 A 92F12687-FD-2104 03 A

Dwg. 12-1201-16; Installation of Station Grounding Grid.

Dwg. 1-1446T-4; Plan of Elect. Equipment & Cable Troughs Aux. Bldg. Below Elevation 650'- 0".

Dwg. 1-1453A-1; Control Room Cable Vault and Grounding EL 633'- 0" 8 Below.

Dwg. 2-1446-114; Plan of Elect. Equip, Conduits, & Cable Troughs Aux. Bldg.

Below EL 650'- 0".

Dwg. 2-1446B-40; Plan of Elect. Equip, Conduits, & Cable Troughs Aux. Bldg.

Below EL 650'- 0".

Dwg. 2-1452-12; Plan of Control Room Equipment-Designation and Location of Cable Plate openings EL 633'- 0".

Dwg. 2-1453-1; Control Room Cable Vault-Trough Hanger Locations 8 Grounding.

Dwg. 1-1454-4; Control-Room Cable Vault BOP Cable Routing Diagram and Access Paths.

Dwg. 2-1454-1; Control Room Cable Vault BOP Cable Routing Diagram and Access Paths.

Dwg. 1-2-1202-4; Containment Building Lightning Protection.

Dwg. 2-1453A-0; Control Room Cable Vault and Grounding Elevation 633'-

0" 8 Below.

Dwg. 12-1453-00; Grounding Details for Control Room Cabinets, Dwg. E-42373-1001-20; Topographical Location Plan.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17329A704&oldid=2425765"