ML17309A542
| ML17309A542 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1993 |
| From: | Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9405050304 | |
| Download: ML17309A542 (100) | |
Text
.ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM 0
0 REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9405050304 DOC.DATE: g9~9VK "NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET 8
~
FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet. Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G
05000244 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY.,R.C.
Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
~~vf D
S 05000244 /
NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72)-
SUBJECT:
"Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept."
W 940429 ltr.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE2SD COPIES RECEIVED:LTRf ENCL g SIZE:
7G TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 LA JOHNSON,A INTERNAL: NRR/DRSS/PRPB11 RGN1 DRSS/RPB EXTERNAL: EG&G AKERS,D COPIES LTTR ENCL 3
3 1
1 2
2 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-3 PD RE 01 RGN1 FILE 02 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 D
D D
NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
D D
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM P 1-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAMEFROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 12 ENCL 12
r'EiZPF JS//ll/8 aire Sill/g//)Ill /riiriiriir emit(1 eiZllI ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ZZ:::-
o 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.Y. 14649-0001 ROBERT C. MECREDY Vice Prerldent Cinna Nuclear Producrion TELEPHONE AREA COOE 71B 546 2700 April 29, 1994 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report R.E.
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244
Dear Sirs:
The enclosed information is being submitted in accordance with the requirement of Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.3
~
This information is a summary of all analyses performed as part of the Radiological Environment Monitoring requirements of Section 3.16 of the R.E.
Ginna Technical Specifications.
Trend plots of gross beta data for air and selected water samples are included for the years of 1992 and 1993 and the years of 1968 to 1993 and gamma measurements from TLD's surrounding the R.E.
Ginna site for 1992 and 1993.
From the data collected, there does not appear to be any measurable effect to the environment from the operation of the R.E. Ginna plant.
Very uly yours, Robert C.
Mec edy 940S050304, 931231 '
PDR 'DOCKr 05000244',',
i" R,,':-',,
PDR. j
1 U
I V
Copies to:
Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1
475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Resident NRC Inspector Ginna Station Ms.
Donna Ross New York State Energy Office Empire State Plaza
- Albany, NY 12223 Mr. James C.
Huang New York State Dept. of Health Empire State Plaza
- Albany, NY 12237 David John Persson New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation 6274 E. Avon-Lima Road
- Avon, NY 14414 American Nuclear Insurers MAELU 29 S.
Main Street Suite 3005 West Hartford, CT 06107-2445 ATTN:
Winthrop Hayes Central Records, Ginna Station Category 2.22.2
OW ~ I
'I
1993 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT R.E. Ginna Nuclear Plant Rochester Gas
&, Electric Corporation Docket No. 50-244
,9405050304
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0
SUMMARY
2.0 SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM Page 2.1 Regulatory Limits
- 2. 2 Regulatory Fulfillment 2.3 Deviations from the Sampling Schedule 3.0 DATA
SUMMARY
15 3.1 Analytical Results 3.2 Air Samples 3.3 Water Samples 3.4 Milk Samples 3.5 Fish Samples 3.6 Vegetation Samples 3.7 External Penetrating Radiation 4.0 LAND USE CENSUS 5.0 EXTERNAL INFLUENCES 6.0 EPA INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON STUDY 15 16 30 48 52 54 57 59 59
LIST OF TABLES Table No.
Page 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 2-5 3-1 A 3-1 B
3-2 A 3-2 B 3-3 A 3-3 B 3-3 C 3-3 D 3-4 3-5 A 3-5 B 3-5 C 3-6 3-7 3-8 3-9 3-10 3-1 1 3-12 A 3-12 B 3-1 3 3-14 3-1 5 3-1 6 3-17 3-1 8 6-1 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Summary Tech Spec Table 3.16-1 Environmental Monitoring Program Tech Spec Table 4.10-1 Maximum Values of LLD Lower Limit of Detection (LLD Detector 1)
Lower Limit of Detection (LLD Detector 2)
Direction and Distance to Sample Points Onsite Samplers, January - June Onsite Samplers, July - December Offsite Samplers, January - June Offsite Samplers, July - December 13 Week Composite Gamma Isotopic Analyses First Quarter 13 Week Composite Gamma Isotopic Analyses Second Quarter 13 Week Composite Gamma Isotopic Analyses Third Quarter 13 Week. Composite Gamma Isotopic Analyses Fourth Quarter Charcoal Cartridges for Iodine Environmental Water Samples Gross Beta Analyses Environmental Water Samples Gross Beta Analyses Fallout Ontario Water District Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Circ. Outlet Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Russell Station Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Tap Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Well "B" Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Deer Creek Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Environmental Water Samples Tritium Analyses.
Fallout Tritium Analyses Iodine in Water Milk Fish Samples Lake Samples Vegetation Samples External Penetrating Radiation EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program 6
7 9
10 11 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 32 33 34 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 47 49 51 53 55 60
LIST OF MAPS Page Onsite Sample Locations Offsite Sample Locations Water Sample and Milk Farm Locations Land Use Census 12 13 14 58
LIST OF TREND PLOTS Onsite Air Monitors, Gross Beta Analysis Offsite Air Monitors, Gross Beta Analysis Annual Trending of Air Activity Environmental Water Samples, Gross Beta Analysis Annual Trending of Environmental Waters External Penetrating Radiation, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program, Gross Alpha-Beta EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program, Gamma Isotopic 27 28 29 35
'36 56 62 63
RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALSURVEY January
- December 1993 1.0
SUMMARY
During 1993, there were no measurable influences from radioactive effluent releases.
Routine measurements continually are taken in the areas surrounding the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant to determine if man-made radioactivity is released at a level that would cause an influence to the environs surrounding the plant.
These measurements detected no measurable activity above established background levels.
Samples are collected on an established schedule for regular testing to determine if measurable levels of activity exist that may be attributed to the operation of the plant. The information obtained from measurements of these environmental samples is compared to the calculated levels of potential activity at the sampling locations from normal plant releases as determined by monitors within the plant effluent streams.
Samples of water, air, fallout, fish, vegetation, milk and direct radiation are collected from locations near the plant that were determined to be at the point of highest concentration from releases through the plant and containment vents. Samples are also collected from additional locations at distances ranging out to eighteen miles.
Reference samples for background measurements are collected concurrently from locations calculated to have radioactivity concentrations less than 1% of those from the closer sampling locations.
These background samples provide continuous background data which makes it possible to distinguish between significant radioactivity introduced into the environment from the operation of the plant and that introduced from other sources.
During 1993, 1467 samples were collected for 1899 analyses for beta and gamma emitters through gross activity counting techniques and gamma spectroscopy.
These total 924 air samples, 301 water samples, 16 fish
- samples, 9 vegetation samples, 59 milk samples, 2 special. lake samples and 156 thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements.
As part of a required quality control program, 9 EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Studies samples (spiked at levels expected to be observed for plant releases) were analyzed and reported.
A summary of the data collected indicating the results of all data for indicator and control locations is given in Table 1-1.
i S"I
Tabl ENVIRONMENTALRADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - DOCKET NO. 50-244 WAYNE, NEW YORK REPORTING PERIOD 1993
..'~LOCATION;::WITH.:HIGHEST,:ANNUALIMEANI
',":,:PnPATHWAY,'.SAMPLED::: ,;"'
-': UNIT:OF: MEASUREMENT"i AIR:
Particulate (pCi/Cu.M.)
Iodine DIRECT RADIATION: (3)
TLD (mrem/QUARTER)
WATER: Drinking (pCi/Liter)
Surface (pCi/liter)
'!TYPE AND::TOTAL";NUMER;";:i
';;."".".",4'"OFlANALYSESFi","'i::I!I"
Gross Beta 617 Gamma Scan 48 Gamma Scan 307 Gamma 156 Gross Beta 75 Gamma Scan 49 Iodine 36 Gross Beta 166 Gamma Scan 37 Iodine 48 LLD':,'::",'.003 (2) 0.02-0.06 5.0 1.2 (2) 0.45 1.2 (2) 0.45
- .: INDICATOR.,LOCATIONS,"!.
- . ':::i,MEAN:;(1):RANGE-",,':;::
0.01 5 (359/359) 0.006-0.030
< LLD
< LLD 12.7 (68/68) 9.4 - 15.4 3.09 (75/75) 1.45 - 5.61 Ra-226 29 (11/50) 12-40
< LLD 2.48 (116/116) 1.52 - 5.38 Ra-266 15 (5/37) 12-19
< LLD
~ '-NAME,'.,DISTANCE..'::.
i":;AND;.DIRECTION'":.;"-';-
Onsite Location ¹ 3 420 M 110 Onsite Location ¹13 230 M 292 Well B" 640 M 150 Well B" 640 M 150 Deer Creek 200 M 135 Deer Creek 200 M 135 i,.;.,MEAN:',(1}.RANGE%'.
0.017 (52/52) 0.007 - 0.030 14.6 (4/4) 13.4 - 15.3 4.34 (11/11) 2.60 - 5.61 Ra-226 23 (11/11) 12-40 3.68 (12/12) 1.98 - 5.38 Ra-226 15 (5/11) 12-19
- "'!CONTROL';L'OCATIONS
- :":i':
":::;":;::;::;'~::,MEAN(1)'RANGE'"'"'
0.014 (258/258) 0.006 - 0.028
< LLD
< LLD 12.1 (84/84) 9.6 - 15.2
< LLD
< LLD 2.66 (50/50) 1.82 - 5.12
< LLD
< LLD MILK:
Rainfall (pCI/mt/day)
(pCi/Liter)
Gross Beta 59 Iodine 59 Gamma Scan 59 1.2 0.45 (2) 3.24 (23/23) 1.26 - 9.13
< LLD LLD Station ¹3 420 M 110 4.06 (12/12) 1.44 - 9.1 3 4.31 (36/36) 0.52 - 15.35
< LLD
< LLD FISH (pCi/Kg)
VEGETATION:
(pCi/Kg)
Gamma Scan 16 Gamma Scan 9
(2)
(2)
Cs-137 29 (8/8) 13-52
< LLD Discharge Plume Cs-137 27 (6/8) 20-42 (1)
(2)
(3)
Mean and range based on detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations in parentheses.
Table of LLD values attached for gamma scan measurements.
One direct radiation location has been deleted from this summary since it was affected by the contaminated equipment storage location 50 meters away. The average reading at this location is 20.4 mrem/Quarter during 1993.
'I
2.0 SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM Regulatory Limits The Technical Specification requirements for the radiological environmental monitoring program are:
Monitorin Pro ram The radiological environmental monitoring program shall be conducted as specified in Table 3.16-1 at the locations given in the ODCM.
If the radiological environmental monitoring program is not conducted as specified in Table 3.16-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a
recurrence.
(Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, seasonal availability, or to malfunction of automatic sampling equipment.
If the latter, efforts shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period.)
If milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples are unavailable for more than one sample period from one or more of the sampling locations indicated by the ODCM, a discussion shall be included in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Report which identifies the cause of the unavailability of samples and identifies locations for obtaining replacement samples.
Ifa milkor leafy vegetable sample location becomes unavailable, the locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the ODCM, provided that comparable locations are added to the environmental monitoring program.
Land Use Census A land use census shall be conducted and shall identify the location of the nearest milk animal and the nearest residence in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a distance of five miles.
An onsite garden located in the meteorological sector having the highest
, historical D/Q may be used for broad leaf vegetation sampling in lieu of a garden census; otherwise the land use census shall also identify the location of the nearest garden of greater than 500 square feet in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a distance of five miles. D/Q shall be determined in accordance with methods described in the ODCM.
Interlaborator Com arison Pro ram Analyses shall be performed on applicable radioactive environmental samples supplied as part of an interlaboratory comparison program which has been approved by NRC, if such a program exists.
(3)
2.2 Regulatory Fulfillment The fulfillment of the Technical Specification requirements shall be demonstrated when:
~Sit The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.16-1. Acceptable locations are 'shown in the ODCM. Samples shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Tables 3.16-1 and 4.10-1.
A land use census shall be conducted annually (between June 1 and October 1).
A summary of the results obtained as part of the required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
2.3 Deviations from the Sampling Schedule Deviations from the sampling schedule are allowed when samples are unavailable due to hazardous conditions, seasonal variations or malfunction of automatic sampling equipment.
There were no deviations from the sampling schedule during 1993.
The milk sampling schedule was changed during the summer season to adjust to a change in the commercial schedule for milk collection at the farms.
The minimum number of samples required in Tech Spec Table 3.16-1 were collected for all pathways.
Table 2-1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TABLE 3-16.1 RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALMONITORING PROGRAM Page1 of 2
- "-,EXPOSUREPATHWAY;,;,";:;;:::,;NUMBER',,OF,:SAIIPL'ES;
- j~"-:"~,."'::..A'ND/OR,'SAMPLE',~.;;-':,'::':;::Bi':.SAMPLEOCATIONS
- SAMPL'ING:."'AND,::COL'L'ECT(ON j:-::::.:,:;::-:";:::::,:;:.:"':$:'::':.'.F,. REQUENCY,;::::,'::.-:;.'j'"j':,'::"-:jg
,;'-j:::;:;j,,".j;:,-,;";::;TYPE~AND,:;:FREQUENCY.;:.OF,,;":ANALYSIS),;:.:;:,;:
P:::;::,:.::::,:::,':
"4;...+~,X',:9 c.::;".'.
AIRBORNE a.
Radionuclide 2 indicator 2 control Continuous operation of Radionuclide canister.
Analyze within 7 days of collection sampler with sample collection of l-131.
at least once per 10 days b.
Particulate 2.
DIRECT RADIATION 3.
WATERBORNE a.
Surface 7 indicator 5 control 18 indicator 10 control 11 placed greater than 5 miles from plant site.
1 control (Russell Station) 1 indicator (Condenser Water Discharge)
Same as above TLDs at least quarterly Composite" sample collected over a period of < 31 days.
Particulate sampler.
Analyze for gross beta radioactivity
> 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following filter change.
Perform gamma isotopic analysis on each sample for which gross beta activity is > 10 times the mean of offsite samples.
Perform gamma isotopic analysis on composite (by location) sample at least once per 92 days.
Gamma dose quarterly.
Gross beta and gamma isotopic analysis of each composite sample.
Tritium analysis of one composite sample at least once per 92 days.
Same as above b.
Drinking 1 indicator (Ontario Water District Intake)
Same as above Composite sample to be collected by collecting an aliquot at intervals not exceeding 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
Table 2-1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TABLE 3-1 6.1 RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALMONITORING PROGRAM Page 2 of 2
'::i::;:;,EXPOSURE,PATHWAY'~,
'!:,"".: ';;,"':,lANDIOR.:SAMPL'E l;>',-.'.::i 4.
INGESTION a.
Milk
- "
- :NUMBER.',OF.;,::SAMPL'ES,
'::@!SAMP,LE:::L"O,GATIONS 1 control 3 indicator June thru October each of 3 farms
'- SAMPLING.'AND'::COL'L'ECTION At least once per 15 days iK:::.TYPE,"AND",:.FREQUENCY.;,':',OF,',""ANALYSIS:":;..::-'amma isotopic and l-131 analysis of each sample.
1 control 1 indicator November thru May on of the farms At least once per 31 days Gamma isotopic and I-131 analysis of each sample.
b.
Fish 4 control Twice during fishing season 4 indicator (Off shore at including at least four species Ginna)
Gamma isotopic analysis on edible portions of each sample.
c.
Food Products 1 control 2 indicator (On site)
Annual at time of harvest.
Sample from two of the following:
1.
apples 2.
cherries
- 3. grapes Gamma isotopic analysis on edible portion of sample.
1 control 1 indicator (On site garden or nearest offsite garden within 5 miles in the highest D/Q meterological sector)
At time of harvest.
One sample of:
- 1. broad leaf vegetation
- 2. other vegetable Gamma isotopic analysis on edible portion of sample.
(6)
Table 2-2 Page 1 of 2 The maximum LLD values as defined by Tech Specs Table 4.10-1 are:
- ,',;":,:;: A'nalysis',.':!",',';-;::, ',::,Water',:;(pCi/l) '.,:: I:,':,: Par'tie'ulate'! o.'":O!
g.-.,;!.(pCi/kg gross beta 3-H 54-Mn 59-Fe 58, 60-Co 65-Zn 95-Zr-Nb 131-I 134, 137-Cs 140-Ba-La 4a 2000 (1000')
15 30 15 30 15b 15(10'), 18 15 1 x 10'2 7 x 10'2 1 x10~
130
'60 130 260 130 15 15b 60 60 a.
LLD for drinking water
- b. Total for parent and daughter
Ui 1
Table 2-2 Page 2 of 2 LLD TABLE NOTATION The LLDis the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that willyield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a
"real" signal.
1 For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):
LLD 4.66 S27 Z V2
~ 22 1'xp [(-at) X]
where LLD is the lower limit of detection as defined above (as pCi per unit mass or volume)
Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute)
E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration)
V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable) is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide Q t is the elapsed time between sample collection and analysis for plant effluents.
For environmental samples, sample time is the end of the sampling period.
The value of Sb used in the calculation of the LLD for. a particular measurement system shall be based on the actual observed variance of the background counting rate or the counting rate of the. blank samples (as appropriate) rather than on an unverified theoretically predicted variance.
In calculating the LLD for a radionuclide determined by gamma-ray spectrometry, the background shall include the typical contribution of other radionuclides normally present in the samples (e.g., potassium-40 in milk samples).
Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions.
Occasionally, background fluctuations, unavoidably small sample
- sizes, the presence of interfering
- nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs unachievable.
(8)
I 1
E
't l ~
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC Table 2-1 LOWER LIMITOF DETECTION (LLD)
Environmental Detector ¹ 1 Sample Size Ave. Decay(c)
AirFilters(a pCi/M3 3500 M3/Qtr Water pCi/liter 3.5 liters Milk Fish Vegetation(a) pCi/liter pCi/kg pCi/kg 3.5 liters 2 kg 2 kg 55days 0.5d 8days 0.5d 6days 0.5days Be-7 0.020 37 37 K-40 0.037 Cr-51 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 0.037 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.004 0.003 40 40 86 18 20 15 71 16 20 14 Ru-103 RU-106 0.003 0.013 41 28 77 76 I-131 0.02 (b) 5 Gamma 0.8 Gamma (d) 0.2 Beta 5 Gamma 18 0.5 Gamma (d) 0.2 Beta Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ce-141 Ce-144 Ra-226 Beta 0.002 0.001 0.005 0.008 0.004 16 42 1.2 17 30 17 47 21 85 16 31 18 84 16 (a) LLDvalue willvary due to different sample sizes.
Data based on 1993 background sample spectra.
(b) Charcoal Cartridge (c) Ave. decay-normal period from midpoint of sampling period to counting time.
(d) Separation by anion exchange on resin (9)
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC Table 2-2 LOWER.LIMITOF DETECTION (LLD)
Environmental Detector 0 2 Sample Size Ave. Decay(c)
Be-7 AirFilters(a pCi/M3 3500 M3/Qtr 55 days 0.010 Water pCi/liter 3.5 liters Milk Fish Vegetation(a) pCi/liter pCi/kg pCi/kg 3.5 liters 2 kg 2 kg 0.5 d 8 days 0.5 d 6 days 0.5 days 12 31 K-40 0.018 Cr-51 0.019 13 24 50 40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.002 12 14 14 Zr-95 0.002 2
4 Nb-95 Ru-103 Ru-106 l-131 0.002 1
3 0.002 2
3 0.007 14 23 0.01(b) 2 Gamma 5
0.5 Gamma (d) 39 3 Gamma 11 0.4 Gamma (d) 38 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ce-141 Ce-144 Ra-226 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.004 5
13 12 25 10 39 10 16 38 10 (a) LLDvalue willvary due to different sample sizes.
Data based on 1993 background sample spectra.
(b) Charcoal Cartridge (c) Ave. decay-normal period from midpoint of sampling period to counting time, (d) Separation by anion exchange on resin
h Ig 'T II
Table 2-5 DIRECTION AND DISTANCE TO SAMPLE POINTS All directions given in degrees and all distances given in meters 87 320 87 320 110 140 420 250
¹4 110 140 420 250 185 160 185 160 232 257 258 225 220 19200 232 257 258 225 220 19200 235 11400 235 11400
¹10
¹11
¹12 185 123 93 13100 11500 25100
¹10
¹11
¹12 185 123 93 13100 11500 25100
¹13 194 690 (jWater)Sam'pie:Loc<ations<,".,.,
"..,'.,'<jDirectfon':,'-,',', ',:;?~P<,',',:.,'Distan'ce'Q)'$i,,'.,
¹13
¹14 292 292 230 770 Russell Station 270 25600
¹15 272 850 Ontario Water Dist Intake 70 2200 Circ Water Intake 0
420 16
¹17 242 208 900 500 Circ Water Discharge Deer Creek Well B Tap Rainfall ¹3 Rainfall ¹5 Rainfall ¹8 Rainfall ¹10 15 105 150 Onsite 110 185 258 185 130 260 640 Sink 420 160 19200 13100
¹18
¹19
¹ 20
¹21
¹22
¹23 24
¹25 193 177 165 145 128 107 90 247 650 400 680 600 810 680 630 14350 Rainfall ¹12 93 25100
"':,"': INilk::Sam'pie'.,Locations','.',":
<:;::,i:::,";:;:'.:,:":;Dire'c'tion'.i;:;..:g:,:;;g'.;:<,',~iDIstan'ce':.,',:;":;.,
I:::<
¹26
¹27 223 202 14800 14700 Farm A Farm B Farm C Farm D 113 242 156 132 9500 5450 4950 21000
¹28
¹ 29
¹ 30
¹31 145 104 103 263 17700 13800 20500 7280 NYC~<4":: "::,:<Y::;;:.'::",.8,:.:<.':;.'<'f84<<.:,'.;,"",<,',Fish'amples',$$~<~4g@>~Pc:,
:Y<(f'"'""">'Cl'2 246 6850 Indicator Samples Lake Ontario Dischargo Plume 33 220 7950 Background Samples Russell Station
- l'"l:":~"'"'-"""i":9'<<i."::'i!:::';:Produ'c'e':Sa'r'nplos""
"'l:NY""'!@PI""""":::.'!YP!
Indicator Samples Grown on property surrounding Plant
¹ 34
¹35
¹36 205 193 174 6850 7600 5650 Background Samples Purchased from farms ) 10 miles 37
¹38
¹ 39 40 158 137 115 87 6000 7070 6630 6630
MAP 2-GINNA STATION LAKE ONTARIO D Air Monitoring Station T2 Thermoluminescent Dosimeter Locations T14 T15 T7 T6
+T3 T24 23 T16 T17 19 T21 Lake Road T22 T20 0Oa' OO Vl OX 0
O O0:
1 Cl C
ClO 0
~pO CO Miles 0
0.5 0.2 0.3 08 UNE 1992 Cauter for Governmental Research Inc
i f
0
TLD~
PEPMANEHiLY PLACED 27 Iat tWl
MAP 2 ihter ~le Station Mill: Sample Station tS HiLE:5---...
LAKE.ONTA Rlo lo HlLES I Descent Bejch 2
SMILE WE ST olt nte ne W LI.I b ON Qi)
NQ SO U
.'L P
NF
e 0 X.
'z <
)I X
i
3.0 DATA
SUMMARY
3.1 Anal tical Results The values listed on the following tables include the uncertainties stated as 2 standard deviations (95% confidence level).
Ke Definitions Curie (Ci):
The quantity of any radionuclide in which the number of disintegrations per second is 37 billion.
Picocurie (pCi):
One millionth of a
millionth of a
curie or 0.037 disintegrations per second.
Cubic Meter (M ): Approximately 35.3 cubic feet.
Liter (L):
Approximately 1.06 quarts.
Lower Limit of Detection The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has requested that reported values be compared to the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) for each piece of equipment.
The LLD for the equipment is established by the measurement of a blank sample.
Table 2-3 and 2-4 are a listing of the LLD values for gamma isotopes using our Ge(Li) multichannel pulse height detector system.
These values are before the correction for decay.
Decay correction is applied from the end of the sampling period to the counting time, not from the midpoint of the sampling period. An explanation of the calculation of the LLD is included with Table 2-2.
Gross detection limits are as follows:
Beta:
Air Water Milk Fallout 0.003 pCi/M gross beta for 400 m sample.
0.7 pCi/L gross beta for 1 liter sample.
0.45 pCi/L iodine 131 for 4 liter'sample.'.1 pCi/m /day for 0.092 M'ollection area.
Gamma:
Air 0.03 pCi/m iodine 131 on charcoal cartridge for 400 M sample.
Radiation:5 millirem/quarter for one quarter exposure (TLD).
(1 5)
During 1993 a new intrinsic Ge crystal was purchased for the environmental program.
This detector has a higher efficiency and therefore, the LLD values are lower.
The variation on the tables of the reported LLD is due to counting samples on the different detectors.
3.2 Air Sam les Radioactive particles in air are collected by drawing approximately one cfm through a two inch diameter particulate filter. The volume of air sampled is measured by a dry gas meter and corrected for the pressure drop across the filter. The filters are changed weekly and allowed to decay for three days prior to counting to eliminate most of the natural radioactivity such as the short half-life daughter products of radon and thoron.
The decay period is used to give a more sensitive measurement of long-lived man-made radioactivity.
A ring of 6 sampling stations is located on the plant site from 150 to 300 meters from the reactor near the point of the maximum annual average ground level concentration.
In addition, there is a ring of 5 sampling stations located approximately 7 to 17 miles from the site that serve as background stations.
I Based on weekly comparisons, there was no statistical difference between the on-site and the backgroundradioactive particulate concentrations.
The average concentrations for the on-site and background samples were 0.016 and 0.015 pCi/m~ respectively for the period of January to December, 1993.
Maximum weekly concentrations for each station were less than 0.028 pCi/m~.
The major airborne activities released from the plant are noble gases, tritium, radioiodines and carbon-14.
Most of this activity is released in a gaseous form, however, some radioiodine is released as airborne particulate.
For airborne particulates, the average calculated concentration of particulate at the site boundary due to measurable plant releases would be 1.2E-6 pCi/m or 0.019%
of the average release concentration of 6.17E-3 pCi/m~.
The survey cannot detect such a concentration which is (0.04% of the LLD of 0.003 pCi/m.
Tables 3-1A, 3-1B are a list of values for the on-site samplers.
Tables 3-2A, 3-2B are a list of values for the off-site samplers.
The particulate filters from each sampling location were saved and a 13 week composite was made.
A gamma isotopic analysis was done for each sampling location and corrected for decay.
The results of these analyses are listed in Tables 3-3 A to D.
Iodine cartridges are placed at six locations.
These cartridges are changed and counted each week.
No positive analysis was found on any sample.
A list of values for these cartridges is given in Table 3-4.
(1 6)
i tt
Trend plots of the 1993 air filter data with a comparison to the 1992 air filter data are included for both onsite and offsite air monitors. Additionally, a trend plot of the annual averages measured since 1968 is included to show the variation of data during the years that the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant has been operational.
The peak activities measured correspond to the years when atmospheric tests of nuclear weapons were being conducted.
Rochester d Electric Table 3-1 A On-Site Samplers Results in pCi/m3 Week Ending an 15-Jan 22-Jan 29Jan 5-Feb 12-Feb 19-Feb 26-Feb 5-Mar 12-Mar 19-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 9-Apr 16-Apr 23-Apr 30-Apr 7-May 14-May 21-May 28-May 4Jun 11 Jun 18Jun 25Jun 2Jul Sta. ¹2 0.017 g 0.001 0.022
+ 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.015
+ 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0-024 i 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.00'1 0.010 g 0.001 0.0'11
+ 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.007 g 0.001 0.010
+ 0.001 0.010
+ 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 Sta. ¹3 0.018 g 0.001 0.024 g 0.002 0.020 g 0.002 0.014 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.002 0.025 g 0.002 0.015
+ 0.001 0.022 g 0.001 0.030 g 0.002 0.020 g 0.002 0.020 g 0.002 0.016 g 0.002 0.010 2 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.008 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.012
+ 0.001 Sta. ¹4 0.017 + 0.001 0.021 g 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.009
+ 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.022 g 0.001 0.024
+ 0.001 0.017 + 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.010
+ 0.001 0.009
+ 0.001 0.010
+ 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.008 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.007 + 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 Sta. ¹5 0.020 0.020 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.022 0.016 0.020 0.024 0.016 0.020 0.013 0.009 0.010 0.012 0.011 0.017 0.009 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.008 0.011 0.014 0.013 0.011
+ 0.001 g 0.001
+ 0.001
+ 0.001 g 0.001
+ 0.001 i 0.001
+ 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001
+ 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.00'l g 0.001
~ 0.001 g 0.00'l g 0.001 g 0.001
~ 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 0.017 0.012 0.009 g 0.002
+ 0.001
+ 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.012
+ 0.001 0.009
+ 0.001 0.009
+ 0.001 0.006 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.011
+ 0.001 Sta. ¹6 0.015
+ 0.001 0.017 f. 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.012
+ 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.018
+ 0.001 0.025 g 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 Sta. ¹7 0.018
+ 0.001 0.019
+ 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.019
+ 0.001 0.021 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.022 + 0.001 0.026
+ 0.002 0.017 g 0.001 0.016 + 0.002 0.013 g 0.001 0.009
+ 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.009 g 0.00'1 0.010
~ 0.001 0.007 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.013
+ 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 Sta 0.020 0.020 0.019 0.016 0.020 0.023 0.016 0.022 0.028 0.019 0.020 0.014 0.010 0.010 0.011 0.013 0.017 0.010 0.011 0.009 0.010 0.006 0.012 0.011 0.012 0.011
¹1 3A g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001
~ 0.001
+ 0.001
+ 0.001
+ 0'01
+ 0.001
~ 0.002 g 0.001
+ 0.001
+ 0.001
+ 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001
+ 0.001
+ 0.001
+ 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001
+ 0'01 Average 0.018 0.020 0.018 0.014 0.019 0.022 0.015 0.021 0.026 0.017
- 0.018 0.014 0.010 0.010 0.011 0.012 0.017 0.011 0.011 0.009 0.010 0.007 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.011 Maximum Average Minimum 0.024 0.014 0.007 R 0.001 a 0.001 0.030 X 0.002 0.024 R 0.001 0.016 0.014 0.008 R 0.001 0.007 2 0.001 0.024 0.015 0.008 N 0.001 a 0.001 0.025 0.014 0.006 i 0.001 0.026 2 0.002 0.028 2 0.002 0.014 0.015 k 0.00'1 0.007 2 0.001 0.006
+ 0.001
- Sampler out of service.
Rochester d Electric Table 3-1 B On-Site Samplers Results in pCi/m3 Week Ending Mul 16-Jul jul Sh/ul 6-Aug 13-Aug 20-Aug 27-Aug 3-sep 10-Sep 17<ep 24-Sep 1-Oct 8-Oct 15-Oct 22-Oct 29-Oct 5-Nov 12-Nov 19-Nov 26-Nov 3-Dec 10-Dec 17-Dec 24-Dec 31-Dec Sta. ¹2 0.017 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.007 + 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 0.022 g 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.018
+ 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.015
+ 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.0'19 g 0.001 0.024 g 0.001 0.017 2 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.027
~ 0.001 0.024 g 0.001 0.022 g 0.002 0.016 g 0.001 0.015
+ 0.001 Sta. ¹3 0.017 g 0.002 0.014 g 0.001 0.007 + 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.010
+ 0.001 0.017
+ 0.001 0.021
+ 0.002 0.018 g 0.002 0.017 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.017
+ 0.001 0.015
+ 0.001 0.009 R 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.023 g 0.001 0.016 + 0.001 0.013
+ 0.001 0.025
+ 0.001 0.022 g 0.001 0.021
~ 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0.021
+ 0.001 0.021
+ 0.001 0.016
+ 0.001 0.014
+ 0.001 Sta. ¹4 0.017
+ 0.001 0.013
+ 0.001 0.008
+ 0'01 0.013
+ 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.016
+ 0.001 0.023
+ 0.001 0.018
+ 0.001 0.019
+ 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 0.013
+ 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.001 0.026
+ 0.001 0.018
+ 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.027 + 0.002 0.024
+ 0.001 0.022
+ 0.002 0.022 g 0.001 0.022 g 0.001 0.022
+ 0.001 0.0'l9 + 0.001 0.015
+ 0.001 Sta. ¹5 0.0'l9 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.009 + 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.019
+ 0.001 0.021
+ 0.001 0.024
+ 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.016
+ 0.001 0.016
+ 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.026 g 0.001 0.019 g 0'01 0.015
+ 0.001 0.026
+ 0.001 0.020
+ 0.001 0.022 2 0.002 0.020 g 0.001 0.022 g 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.016
+ 0.001 0.015
+ 0.001 Sta. ¹6 0.018 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.008 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.001 0.023 g 0.001 0.014
+ 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.008 g 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.025 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.026 g 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0.020 g 0.002 0.021 g 0.001 0.023 g 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 Sta. ¹7 0.018 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.008 + 0.001 0.0'13 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0.022
+ 0.002 0.022 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.017 + 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.022 g 0.002 0.018 g 0.002 0.025 g 0.002 0.016 g 0.002 0.0'l7 g 0.002 0.026 + 0.002 0.02'I + 0.002 0.020 g 0.002 0.020 g 0.002 0.022 g 0.002 0.019 g 0.002 0.015
+ 0.002 0.015 g 0.002 Sta. ¹13A "0.020 g 0.002 0.018 g 0.001 0.008 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.001 0.022 i 0.001 0.015 g 0.00'I 0.014 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.025 g 0.002 0.018 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.026 g 0.002 0.022 g 0.001 0.022 g 0.002 0.021 g 0.001 0.022 g 0.002 0.018 g 0.001 0.019
~ 0.002 0.015 g 0.001 Average 0.018 0.014 0.008 0.012 0.012 0.018 0.022 0.021 0.016 0.014 0.017 0.015 0.009 0.018 0.0'I8 0.025 0.017 0.015 0.026 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.022 0.020 0.017 0.015 Maximum Average Minimum 0.027 2 0.001 0.017 0.007 2 0.001 0.025 k 0.001 0.017 0.007 0 0.001 0.027 2 0.002 0.026 2 0.001 0.026 i 0.001 0.026 R 0.002 0.026 R 0.002 0.018 0.017 0.017 0.018 0.018 0.008 i 0.001 0.009 2 0.001 0.008 i 0.001 0.008 k 0.001 0.008 k 0.001
- Sampler out of service.
Rochester d Electric Table 3-2 A Off-Site Samplers Results in pCi/m3 Week Ending 8Jan 1&Jan 224an 2&an 5-Feb 12-Feb 19-Feb 26-Feb 5-Mar 12@liar 19-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 9-Apr 16-Apr 23-Apr 30-Apr 7-May 14-May 21-May 28-May 4Jun 114un 18Jun 25Jun jul Sta. ¹8 0.014 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.014
+ 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.019
+ 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.017 ~ 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.011
+ 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.009
+ 0.001 0.010
+ 0.001 0.008 g 0.001 0.008 g 0.001 0.006 g 0.001 0.0'l1 2 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.011
+ 0.001 0.010
+ 0.001 Sta.¹9 0.018 g 0.002 0.014
+ 0.002 0.016 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.019 + 0.002 0.021
+ 0.002 0.014 g 0.001 0.020 g 0.002 0.020 g 0.002 0.016 g 0.001 0.019
+ 0.002 0.010 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.016 + 0.001 0.011
+ 0.001 0.010
+ 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.008 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.011
+ 0.001 0.014
+ 0.001 0.012
+ 0.001 Sta. ¹10 0.018 g 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.017 g 0.002 0.013 g 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.021 g 0.002 0.016 g 0.002 0.020 g 0.002 0.023 g 0.002 0.015 g 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.011 g 0.002 0.008 g 0.002 0.011 g 0.002 0.011
+ 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.015
+ 0.002 0.012
+ 0.002 0.011 g 0.002 0.009 g 0.002 0.008 g 0.002 0.007 g 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.012
+ 0.002 0.011
+ 0.002 0.010 g 0.002 Sta. ¹11 0.016 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0.023 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.00'l 0.017 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.007 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 Sta.¹12 0.018 + 0.001 0.018
+ 0.001 0.019
+ 0.001 0.014 g 0.00'l 0.020
+ 0.001 0 021
+ 0 001 0.017
+ 0.001 0.019
+ 0.001 0.028 g 0.002 0.016
+ 0.001 0.020
+ 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.009
+ 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.011
+ 0.001 0.016
+ 0.001 0.011
+ 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.008 + 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.007 R 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.011
+ 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.009 + 0.001 Average 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.013 0.018 0.020 0.015 0.019 0.023 0.016 0.018 0.011 0.009 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.016 0.011 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.007 0.012 0.011 0.012 0.010 Maximum Average Minimum 0.020 2 0.001 0.012 0.006 2 0.001 0.021 k 0.002 0.014 0.008 i 0.001 0.023 2 0.002 0.014 0.007 2 0.002 0.023 i 0.001 0.028 i 0.002 0.014 0.014 0.007 2 0.001 0.007 R 0.001
- Sampler out of service.
(20)
Rochester d Electric Table 3-2 B Off-Site Samplers Results in pCi/m3 Week Ending 9Jul 1Mut 2&Jul Seoul 6-Aug 13-Aug 20-Aug 27-Aug 3-Sep 10-Sep 17-Sep 24-Sep 1-Oct 8-Oct 15-Oct 22-Oct 29-Oct 5-Nov 12-Nov 19-Nov 26-Nov 3-Dec 10-Dec 17-Dec 24 Dec 31-Dec Sta. ¹8 0.016 g 0.001 0.012
+ 0.001 0.007 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.012
+ 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.018 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.013
+ 0.001 0.0'l2 + 0.001 0.007 1 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.025
+ 0.002 0.017
+ 0.001 0.014
+ 0.001 0.025
+ 0.002 0.020 g 0.001 0.018 g 0.002 0.020 2 0.001 0.022 2 0.002 0.015
+ 0.001 0.016 + 0.002 0.015
+ 0.001 Sta. ¹9 0.018 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.008 g 0.001 0.012
+ 0.001 0.012 Z 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.002 0.020 g 0.002 0.014 g 0.001 0.014
+ 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.009 g 0.001 0.018 g 0.002 0.013
+ 0.001 0.022 + 0.002 0.016 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.024 g 0.002 0.019 g 0.002 0.017 g 0.002 0.018
+ 0.001 0.019 + 0.002 0.016
+ 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 Sta. ¹10 0.017 g 0.002 0.012 g 0.002 0.008 g 0.002 0.010 g 0.002 0.011 g 0.002 0.019 g 0.002 0.021 g 0.002 0.021 g 0.002 0.014 g 0.002 0.013 g 0.002 0.016 g 0.002 0.013 g 0.002 0.007 g 0.002 0.018 j 0.002 0.014 g 0.002 0.028 g 0.002 0.015 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.023 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.020 g 0.001 0.015 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 Sta 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.012 0.013 0.019 0.021 0.023 0.016 0.014 0.017 0.017 0.008 0.021 0.015 0'27 0.017 0.017 0.024 0.019 0.023 0.019 0.02'I 0.018 0.014 0.017
. ¹11
+ 0.002
+ 0.001 g 0.001 g 0.001
+ 0'01
+ 0.00'1 g 0.002
+ 0.002
+ 0.00'1 g 0.001
+ 0.001 g 0.001
+ 0.001
+ 0.002 g 0.001 g 0.002 g 0.001
+ 0.002 2 0.002 g 0.002
+ 0.003 g 0.002 g 0.002
+ 0'02 g 0.002 2 0.002 Sta. ¹12 0.019 + 0.001 0.012 g 0.001 0.007 + 0.001 0.011 g 0.001 0.010 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.001 0.019 g 0.001 0.019
+ 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.013 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.014 g 0.001 0.008
+ 0.001 0.018 g 0.00'1 0.015 g 0.001 0.024 g 0.002 0.016 g 0.001 0.016 g 0.001 0.026 g 0.002 0.018
+ 0.001 0.020
+ 0.002 0.022 g 0.001 0.021 g 0.002 0.017 g 0.001 0.017 g 0.002 0.015 g 0.001 Average 0.018 0.013 0.008 0.011 0.012 0.018 0.020 0.020 0.014 0.013 0.015 0.014 0.008 0.018 0.014 0.025 0.016 0.015 0.024 0.019 0.019 0.019 0.021 0.016 0.015 0.014 Maximum Average Minimum 0.025 2 0.002 0.024 2 0.002 0.015 0.016 0.007 i 0.001 0.008 i 0.001 0.028 0.016 0.007 i 0.002 1 0.002 0.027 0.018 0.008 R 0.002 0.026 R 0.002 0.016 2 0.001 0.007
+ 0.001
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-3 A 13 Week Composite Gamma Isotopic Analysis Result in pCI/m3 First Quarter Sta. ¹2 Sta. ¹3 Sta. ¹4 Sta. ¹5 Sta. ¹6 Sta. ¹7 Sta. ¹8 Sta. ¹9 Sta. ¹10 Sta.
¹11 Sta. ¹12 Sta.
¹13A
.098 g.012
.111 g.016
.101 +.013
.097 g.013
.095 +.014
.102 +.015
,086 g.014,110
+.022
.090 +.015
.082 +.016
.111 +.190
<<.011
<.019
<.01 4
<.012
<.01 3
<.015
<.013
<.027
<.010
<.01 0
<.01 4 Mn-54
<<.001
<<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001 c.001
<.001 Fe-59 GAS
<.001
<.001
<.001
<<001
<.001
<.001
<<.001
<<.001
<.001 Ce<50
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<<.001 Zr-95
<.001
<<.001 Nb-95
<.001
<.001 Ru-103
<.001
<.001 Ru-106
<<.004
<.007
<.007
<.011 Cs-134
<<.001
<001
<.001
<.001
<<.001
<<.001
<.001
<.001
<.C01 Ce-137
<.001
<<.001
<.001
<.001 c.C01
<.001
<,001
<001
<<.001
<.001
<.052
<.072
<.108 (104
<.1 02
<.127 Ce-141
<.002 Ce-144
<<.003
<.007 AIIvalues given as ( are less than LLDcorrected for decay.
(22)
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-3 B 13 Week Composite Gamma Isotopic Analysis Result in pCi/m3 Second Quarter Sta. ¹2 Sta. ¹3 Sta. ¹4 Sta. ¹5 Sta. ¹6 Sta. ¹7 Sta. ¹8 Sta. ¹9 Sta. ¹10 Sta. ¹11 Sta. ¹12 Sta. ¹1 3A Be-7
.111
@,012
.094 f.012
.105 Q,009
.098 f.012 115 +
015
.093 f.013
.103 f.011
.111 +.012
.099 g.010
,100 g.015
<.019
<.01 5 c.012
<.015
<.017
<.01 3
<.028
<.01 8
<.017 M@44 c001 c.001
<.001 c001 c001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001 CPS
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<,001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<,001 c.001 c.001 c001
<.001 c001
<<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001 Zr-95 c001
<.001
<.001 c001
<.001
<.001
<.001 Nb-95
<.001
<.001
<.001
<<.001
<<.001 Ru-103
<.001 c001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001 c001
<.001 c001 Ru-106 c.004 c006
<.011 Ce-134 c001 c.001 c001
<.001
<.001 c,001
<.001
<.001 Cs-137
<.001
<.001 c001
<.001
<.001 c001 c.001 c001 c001
<.001 c001 B4.140 c022
<.040
<.037
<.057 Ce-141
<.001
<.001 Allvalues given as ( are less than LLD corrected for decay.
(23)
Rochester d Electric Table 3-3 C 13 Week Composite Gamma Isotopic Analysis Result in pCi/m3 Third Quarter Sta. ¹2 Sta. ¹3 Sta. ¹4 Sta. ¹5 Sta. ¹6 Sta. ¹7 Sta. ¹8 Sta. ¹9 Sta. ¹10 Sta. ¹11 Sta. ¹12 Sta. ¹13A Be.7
.103 f.015
,099 g.010
.084 f.016
.106 Q,019
.117 g.007
.120 +.025
.110 f.024
.087 g.010
.111 g.020
<.013
<.011
<.01 4
<.01 4
<<.014
<.01 8
<.014
<.017
<.007
<.01 5
<.001
<001
<<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<<.001
<.001 Zr-95
<.001
<.001
<003 Nb-95
<<.001
<<.001
<.001 Ru-103
<<.001
<.001
<.001 Ru-105
<.007
<.007
<.001
<.001
<001
<.001
<<.001
<.010 Cs-137
<001
<.001
<<.001
<,001
+001
<.001
<<.001 (001
<<.001
<.001
<.001
<.078
<.153
<.087
<.1 41
<.178
<.072
<<.21 0
<.211
<.201 Ce 141
<.005 Allvalues given as < are less than LLDcorrected for decay.
(24)
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-3 D 13 Week Composite Gamma Isotopic Analysis Result in pCi/m3 Fourth Quarter Sta. ¹2 Sta. ¹3 Sta. ¹4 Sta. ¹5 Sta. ¹6 Sta. ¹7 Sta. ¹8 Sta. ¹9 Sta. ¹10 Sta. ¹11 Sta. ¹12 Sta. ¹13A Be-7
.083 g.010
,078 +.013
.077 +.012
.082 g.013
.089 +.011
.088 f.014
,089 +.012
.075 g.012
.078 +.001
.085 g.002
.082 g.018
<.013
<.017 c01 4
<.012
<.015
<.017
<.011
<.017
<.015 c001
<.001 c001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001 Fe59
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
- <<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001 c001
<.001
<.001 c001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<<.001 c001 Zr-95
<.001
<.001
<.001 Nb.95
<<.001
<<.001 Ru-103
<.001 Ru-105
<<.007
<.007 c001
<.001 c001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001 Cs-137
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001 c001
<.051
<.028
<.105
<.119
<.121 Ce.14l
<.001 AIIvalues given as ( are less than LLD corrected for decay.
(25)
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC Table 3-4 Charcoal Cartridges Gamma Analysis for Iodine Results in pCi/m3 Week Ending Man 1&Jan 224an 29-Jan 5-Feb 12-Feb 19-Feb 26-Feb 5-Mar 12-Mar 19-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 9-Apr 16-Apr 23-Apr 30-Apr 7-May 14-May 21-May 28-May
+Jun 114un 18-Jun un Qul jul 164ul
~ul jul 6-Aug 13-Aug 20-Aug 27-Aug 3-Sep 10-Sep 17-Sep 24-Sep 1-Oct 8-Oct 15-Oct 22-Oct 29-Oct 5-Nov 12-Nov 19-Nov 26-Nov 3.Dec 10-Dec 17-Dec 24-Dec 31-Dec Sta. ¹2
<.026
<.042
<.048
<.024
<.030
<.024
<.049
<.028
<.027
<.040
<.026
<.024
<.032
<.028
<.049
<.029
<.030
<.033
<.030
<.031
<.028
<.037
<.060
<.031
<.037
<.035
<.041
<.018
<.016
<.023
<.025
<.025
<.019
<.019
<.038
<.043
<.038
<.019
<.036
<.018
<.020
<. 016
<.035
<.018
<<.021
<.037
<.044
<.047
<.017 Sta. ¹4
<.047
<.036
<.025
<.031
<.038
<.028
<.030
<.052
<.028
<.034
<.032
<.021
<.034
<.029
<.053
<.034
<.034
<.028
<.030
<.030
<.026
<.051
<.034
<.028
<.031
<.031
<.057
< ~ 020
<.018
<.030
<.030
<.030
<.018
<.018
< ~ 036
<.019
<.038
<.018
<.041
<.036
<.039
<.019
<.034
<.019
<.020
<.021
<.042
<.0'18
<.041
<.032
<.019
<.040 Sta. ¹7
<.029
<.025
<.057
<.034
<.035
<.035
<.037
<.030
<.044
<.030
<.042
<.037
<.032
<.035
<.027
<.031
<.033
<.032
<.029
<.036
<.032
<.042
<.019
<.031
<.033
<.043
< ~ 033
<.030
<.030
<.022
<.024
<.024
<.049
<.023
<.017
<.022
<.045
<.048
<.046
<.022
<.028
<.032
<.063
<.065
<.059
<.029
<.036
<.048
<.058
<.064
<.034
<.033 Sta. ¹9
<.051
<.048
<.054
<.042
<.045
<.049
< ~ 043
<.042
<.035
<.044
<.029
<.036
<.040
<.047
<.032
<.034
<.037
<.035
<.028
<.046
<.036
<.040
<.039
<.037
<.041
<.046
<.037
<.034
<.027
<.026
<.027
<.022
<.026
<.024
<.052
<.025
<.026
<.'028
<.026
<.054
<.046
<.047
<.052
<.051
<.023
<.023
<.030
<.019
<.056
<.017
<.021
<<.043 Sta. ¹11
<.029
<.025
<.026
<.022
<.028
<.027
<.049
<.033
<.023
<.029
<.026
<.022
<.024
<.028
<.028
<.0?9
<.044
<.034
<.034
<.037
<.041
<.031
<.058
<.038
<.039
< ~ 036
<.024
<.022
<.025
<.028
<.026
<.024
<.051
(.025
<.049
<.044
<.046
<.047
<.024
<.051
<.053
<.030
<.037
<.058
<.048
<.062
<.034
<.036
<.039
<.051 Sta. ¹12
<.025
<.033
<.035
<.026
<.033
<.048
<.054
<.050
<.035
<.031
<.028
<.031
<.028
<.032
<.024
<.029
<.027
<.027
<.031
<.032
<.025
<.047
<.047
<.029
<.027
<.042
<.033
<.029
<.031
<.028
<.027
<.019
<.021
<.027
<.043
<<.022
<.043
<.025
<.044
<.022
<.043
<.041
<.043
<.020
<.043
<.046
<.062
<.017
<.022
<.047
<.023
<<.013 II values given as ( are less than LLD corrected for decay.
- Sampler out of Service (26)
R.E. GINNANUCL OWER STATION
.030 ONSITE AIR MONITORS GROSS BETA ANALYSIS
.025 P
I.020
.015 M
E E
T.010 R
.005
.000 h.
0) r CO Q) h.
0) r C9 A
h 0) v-0)
C h
0)
N CV CEI CV bl C9 C9 0)
C9 C9 WEEK NUMBER
~ 1992 ~ 1993 (27 )
R.E. GINNANUCL OWER STATION OFFSlTE AIR MONlTORS
.030 GROSS BETAANALYSIS
.025 P
C
.020
.015 U
E.010 T
E R
.005
.000 CO 4)
(
0)
~
C9 A
t C33 v-CO CC)
N 0) r CO IA N
C33 bl Ol CV CV CV C9 C9 C9 0)
CO WEEK NUMBER
l31992 ~ 1993 (28)
Cl
0.350 ANNUALTRENDING OF AIRACTIVTY GROSS BETAANALYSISFOR 1968-1993 0.300 0.250 P
C
'.200 I
L I
T 0.150 E
R 0.100 0.050 0.000 CO CD 0
~
bl 0) g lO CO N
CO CD 0
~
bl CO 4
IA CD CD (0
W W
W M
W W
W W
W W
CCI CO CO CO CCI Co CQ CO YEARS 1968 - 1993 Co CD O
r bl CO CCI tQ CD CD CD
~ ONSITE ~ OFFSITE PEAKS ARE INDICITIVEOF NUCLEAR DETONATIONS IN THE ATMOSPHERE (29)
3.3 Water Sam les Water samples are collected on a regular schedule from locations surrounding the plant to demonstrate that there is no measurable influence or contamination of drinking or irrigation water from liquid effluent releases or deposition from gaseous effluent releases.
Composite samples are collected weekly from Lake Ontario, upstream (Russell Station) and downstream (Ontario Water District Plant - OWD), and analyzed for gross beta activity.
There was no significant difference between the upstream and downstream'sample concentrations.
The 1993 averages were 2.66 and 3.06 pCi/literfor the upstream and downstream samples respectively.
Weekly composite samples are taken from the plant circulating water intake (Circ In) and discharge canal (Circ Out).
The yearly averages were 2.53 and 2.53 pCi/liter for the intake and discharge canal respectively.
These are essentially the same as the upstream and downstream values as they fall within the + 2 sigma error band and range of, the measurement.
A gamma isotopic analysis of biweekly composites of the OWD and the discharge canal is performed.
II For all batch releases, the average concentration in the discharge canal from the identified activity during 1993 was 0.23 pCi/liter. The normal 2 sigma variation for the activity calculation of composite samples is 0.67 pCi/liter or 3 times the average concentration added by releases from the plant.
f Samples of tap water, the nearest well, and the creek which crosses the site are collected and analyzed monthly.
The results show no indication of plant influence.
Results for all water beta analyses are listed in Tables 3-5A, 3-5B.
Gamma isotopic analysis is done on each monthly sample and each biweekly or monthly composite of weekly samples.
These are listed in Tables 3-6 to 3-11 and separated by source-'of sample.
Trend plots are included to show the weekly upstream and downstream beta activities.
Peaks up to 5 pCi/liter occur when the lake is stirred up by wind and the sample includes large quantities of suspended silt. A trend plot showing the annual average activity measured during the years 1968 to 1993 is included to show the data during the years the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant has been in operation.
The peaks correspond to the years when atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons occurred.
(30)
t l
il IR
Fallout Fallout is a term used to denote radioactive material settling from the atmosphere to the ground. At the sampling stations, the fallout settles as dust or is collected with rainfall by a funnel and bottle.
There are two on-site sampling stations and three off-site.
Fallout generally increases in the spring months due to transfer of fission products from the upper to the lower atmosphere in conjunction with increased rainfall. The onsite average and the offsite average were 3.24 and 4.31 pCi/m /day respectively.
There is no significant difference between on-site and off-site samples for the period of January through December, 1993.
Table 3-5C lists the values for fallout samples.
Tritium Anal sis Tritium analysis is done on all water samples on a monthly basis.
Composites are made from the weekly composites and a portion distilled for analysis to remove interfering elements or activity. Tritium data is given in Tables 3-12 A
- 5. B.
iodine Anal sis All monthly composite water samples except the fallout samples are analyzed for iodine-131.
The analysis allows the determination of iodine-131 activity of 1 pCi/liter. iodine data is given in Table 3-13. Any positive counts and the 2 sigma error are reported.
Allnegative counts after background correction are reported as <LLD for that analysis.
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-5 A Environmental Water Samples Gross Beta Analysis Results in pCi / I Week Ending 8-Jan 1&Jan 224an 29-Jan 5-Feb 12-Feb 19-Feb 26-Feb 5-Mar 12-Mar 19-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 9-Apr 16-Apr 23-Apr 30-Apr 7-May 1+May 21-May 28-May
+Jun 114un 1Mun 2&Jun jul 2.83 3.23 2.20 5.12 2.79 2.41 3.05 2.88 2.82 4.69 2.76 2.94 3.06 2.42 2.59 2.49 2.21 3.02 2.44 2.07 2.22 2'7 2.84 2.32 2.23
+ 0.66 i 0.68 g 0.69
+ 0.89 i 0.68 i 0.66 i 0.69 i 0.70
+ 0.66 g 0.78 g 0.70 i 0.71
+ 0.68
+ 0.66
+ 0.69
+ 0.68 i 0.70 g 0.73 i 0.71 g 0.67
+ 0.67
+ 0.68
+ 0.70 i 0.70 i 0.70 Russell
- O.W.D.
3.97 i 0.71 3.72 g 0.70 2.84 + 0.72 2.67 ~ 0.72 3.24 i 0.71 3.24 i 0.70 3.04 i 0.70 3.03
+ 0.71 2.42 + 0.68 3.68 g 0.70 4.55 i 0.77 5.30 + 0.80 3.52
+ 0.70 4.88 + 0.76 3.05
+ 0.71 2.77 g 0.70 3.85 i 0.74 1.97 + 0.69 2.44
+ 0.70 2.46 + 0.68 2.85
+ 0.70 2.44
+ 0.68 1.95
+ 0.69 1.63 g 0.66 1.72 i 0.68 2.33 + 0.70 Circ In 0.68 0.66 0.71 0.68 0.70 0.67 0.69 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.69 0.70 0.70 0.68 0.67 0.69 0.68 0.70 0.70 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.70 0.66 0.67 0.69 3.27 i 2.78 g 2.54 g 1.82 i 3.10 i 2.30 i 2.90 +
2.42 i 2.49 g 2.91 2.46 i 2.92
+
2.79 g 3.16 g 2.26 i 2.99 i 2.54 g 2.28 +
2 ~ 41 +
2.68 +
2.44 ~
2.36 g 2.79 i 1.85 1.75 2.06 +
3.6'1 3.09 2.21 2.95 3.07 3.13 2.48 2.02 2.52 3.18 2.46 2.39 2.20 2.68 3.03 2.59 2.52 3.01 2.18 2.29 1.66 2.01 2.18 3.15 2.07 1.52 i 0.69 i 0.67 i 0.64 i 0.69 g 0.69 g 0.69 g 0.66 g 0.66
~ 0.68 g 0.68 i 0.68 g 0.68 i 0.67 i 0.66 i 0.70 g 0.69 i 0.68
~ 0.73
~ 0.69 g 0.69 i 0.65 g 0.66
+ 0.68 i 0.71 i 0.69 g 0.67 Circ Out Deer Creek 3.43 + 0.76 3.52 i 0.72 3.73 g 0.72 2.80 i 0.68 2.37 i 0.72 2.78
+ 0.72 Tap Well
'B'.68 i 0.65 4.91 i 0.81 2.60 i 0.67 2.34 + 0.68 5.61 i 0.79 1.83 i 0.68 4.24 g 0.78 1.57 2 0.63 2.60 g 0.70 2.30 g 0.67 3.82 g 0.75 Maximum Average Minimum 5 ~ 12 2.80 2.07
+ 0.89
+ 0.67 5.30 + 0.80 3.06 1.63 i 0.66 3.27 i 2.55 1.75 0.68 0.67 3.61
+ 0.69 2.55 1.52 i 0.67 3.73 3.11 2.37 g 0.72 i 0.72 2.68 g 0.65 2.22 1.57 + 0.63 5.61 2 0.79 4.24 2.60
+ 0.70
- 1 Sample lost in shipping 2 Well Pump inoperable (32)
I
Rochester d Electric Table 3-5 B Environmental Water Samples Gross Beta Analysis Results in pCi / I Week Ending Mul 16Jul 2Wut jul 6-Aug 13-Aug 20-Aug 27-Aug 3-Sep 10-Sep 17-Sep 24-Sep 1-Oct 8-Oct 15-Oct 22-Oct 29-Oct 5-Nov 12-Nov 19-Nov 26-Nov 3-Dec 10-Dec 17-Dec 24 Dec 31-Dec
- 2. '10 1.82 2.62 1.87 1.82 2.72 2.56 2.53 3.09 2.23 2.69 2.10 3.00 1.84 2.08 2.38 2.45 2.28 2.71 3.23 3.09 3.39 3.62 2.25 2.60
+ 0.67 i 0.66 i 0.70
+ 0.67 i 0.67
+ 0.71 i 0.71 i 0.70 g 0.68
+. 0.64 g 0.66 i 0.65 i 0.74 i 0.72 i 0.73
+ 0.71
+ 0.75 i 0.71 i 0.72 i 0.74 i 0.73 i 0.75 i 0.78
+ 0.73
+ 0.72 Russell O.W.D.
3.67 + 0.75 2.42 i 0.69 4.94 i 0.80 2.80 + 0.72 2.36 i 0.69 2.77
+ 0.71 2.77 i 0.72 3.14 i 0.73 2.38 + 0.64 3.50
+ 0.69 2.86 i 0.67 3.'l6 i 0.68 2.50
+ 0.67 3.19 + 0.74 3.37 + 0.76 2.26 + 0.74 3.09 + 0.74 3.02 i 0.77 2.65 i 0.74 2.66 i 0.72 2.98 i 0.73 3.31 2 0.74 3.16 + 0.76 3.14
+ 0.77 3.78 + 0.77 3.51 i 0.77 1.69 2.21 1.63 2.21 2.25 2.42 2.34 2.60 2.33 2.84 2.97 2.03 2.79 3.34 2.57 2.60 2.23 2.55 2.76 2.73 2.44 2.89 2.38 2.13 3.51 3.01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
ii
+
+
0.68 0.67 0.66 0.68 0.68 0.69 0.70 0.71 0.64 0.66 0.67 0.63 0.68 0.75 0.72 0.72 0.71 0.75 0.73 0.72 0.70 0.72 0.73 0.71 0.78 0.74 Circ In Circ Out 1.57 + 0.67 2.43 + 0.68 2.40 i 0.69 2.41
+ 0.69 2'4 + 0.70 2.27 i 0.68 1.72 i 0.67 1'5 i 0.67 3.03 i 0.67 2.80 + 0.66 2.81 i 0.66 2.75 i 0.66 2.88 i 0.68 2.58 i 0.71 2.98
+ 0.74 3'3 + 0.74 2.66
+ 0.73 2.25
+ 0.74 2.61 i 0.73 2.60 i 0.71 1.96 i 0.70 2.55 i 0.71 2.91
+ 0.72 2.61
+ 0.74 2.58 i 0.72 2.66 i 0.75 Deer Creek 4.94
+ 0.80 1.98 i 0.69 3.62 i 0.71 5.09 i 0.78 5.38 i 0.79 4.55 i 0.76 2.30 i 0.69 4.71 i 0.80 2.09 g 0.63 5.01 i 0.76 2.37 i 0.71 4.33 i 0.78 1.84
+ 0.72 4.97 i 0.79 1.90 i 0.67 3.88 w 0.75 Tap Well
'B'.45 i 0.64 3.76 i 0.77 Maximum Average Minimum 3.62 2.52 1.82
+ 0.78 i 0.67 4.94 i 0.80 3.05 2.26 i 0.74 3.51 2.52 1.63
+ 0.78 i 0.66 3.03 i 0.74 2.51 1.57 i 0.67 5.38 i 0.79 2.37 + 0.71 5.01
+ 0.76 4.26 1.99 4.44 1.98 i 0.69 1.45 i 0.64 3.76 i 0.77
- 1 Sample lost in shipping (33)
Rochester Gas and Electric Table 3-5 C Fallout Gross Beta Analysis Results in pCi/ m'/ Day Month of January February March April May June July August September October November December Maximum Average Minimum Station 3 2.49 R 0.51 7.60 2 0.73 7.04 a 0.72 9.13 i 0.59 1A4 2 0.59 2.94 R 0.55 2.55 a 0.56 3.69 R 0.63 2.84 k 0.50 2.90 4 0.58 3.15 a 0.54 2.90 a 0.58 9.13 R 0.59 4.06 1A4 k 0.59 Station 5 Station 8 2,11 R 0.52 15.35 R 0,70 2.31 a 0.58 1.55 a OA8 2.64 x 0.55 2.47 a 0.63 3.05 a 0.55 1.75 x 0.53 1.26 R 0.55 2.31 i 0.50 3.42 x 0.60 8.56 k 0.66 6.81 2 0.60 4.84 i 0.62 1.10 R 0.54 1.79 k 0.53 1.03 R 0.52 0.86 k 0.56 1.49 R 0.49 0.52 i 0.52 5.87 a 0.66 3.80 x
0.63 8.84 a 0.73 Station 10 0.57 R OA8 1.77 i 0.49 1.63 a
OA8 3.14 a 0.55 2.24 x 0.62 Station 12 1.29 R 0.49 2.71 k 0.50 1.69 a
0.51 4.56 a 0.56 4.12 k 0.72 1.31 2 0.52 12.94 R 0.73 2.22 f 0.54 1.35 e 0.59 0.95 k OA8 1.00 a 0.55 3.63 a 0.54 5.18 a 0.63 4.41 a 0.60 6.80 i 0.65 9.68 k 0.62 8AO a 0.68 13.76 R 0,74 2.78 x 0,59 3.80 a 0.63 15.35 x 0.70 5.18
+ 0.63 13.76 a 0.74 2.42 4,76 2.08 6.10 1.26 k 0.55 0.52 f 0.52 0.57 x OA8 1.29 a
OA9
- Sample unobtainable.
(34)
R.E. GINNANUCL OWER STATION ENVIRONMENTALWATER SAMPLES GROSS BETAANALYSISFOR 1993 6.00 5.00 Pc 4.oo I
3.00 L
I T
E 2.00 R
1.00 0.00
~ bl C9 4 40 CO 6 cO S 0 r CV CO 4 0 8 h- 00 0 0 ~ CV 0 4 0 cO l co 0 0 t-N 0 C 0 CD 6 cO 0 0 ~ N c9 4 0 (0 6 co S 0 ~ CV
~ w w r w w w w P4 bl CV CV CV bl CV 8 CV bl c9 cO cO cO cO N c9 cO c9 cO 0 4 4 0 0 4 4 4 rt' 0 4 0 WEEK NUMBER
~ OWD ~
RUSSEL (35)
~,
V
ANNUALTRENDING OF ENVIRONMENTALWATER 12.00 GROSS BETAANALYSIS 10.00 P
800 C
I I
L 6.00 I
T E
R 400 2.00 0.00 CO 0)
O
~
bl CO C
CO CO h-0O 0)
O
~
CV CO rl CO CO CO CO W
W W
W W
W W
W W
W 0O CO 0O 00 00 OO 0O 00 YEARS 1968 - 1993
~ RUSSELL~ OWD (36)
C f
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-6 Ontario Water District Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Results in pCi/Liter Between Dates Of 7Be 51 Cr 54Mn 59Fe 58Co 60Co 65Zn 95Zr 95Nb 103Ru 106Ru 134Cs 137Cs 140Ba 141Ce 144Ce 226Ra 1Jan 16Jan 29Jan 12-Feb 26-Feb 12-Mar 26-Mar 9-Apr 23-Apr 7-May 21-May 4Jun 18Jun 2Jul 16Jul 30Jul 13-Aug 27-Aug 10-Sep 24 Sep 8-Oct 22-Oct 5-Nov 19-Nov 3-Dec 17-Dec 16Jan 29Jan 12-Feb 26-Feb 12-Mar 26-Mar 9-Apr 23-Apr 7-May 21-May 4Jun 18Jun 2Jul 16Jul 30Jul 13-Aug 27-Aug 10-Sep 24-Sep 8-Oct 22-Oct 5-Nov 19-Nov 3-Dec 17-Dec 31-Dec
<31
<30
<30
<21
<30
<20
<26
<29
<29
<30
<30
<14
<14
<14
<27
<14
<39 (40
<13
<40
<12
<39
<39
<39
<13
<39
<34
<35
<36
<23
<37
<22
<33
<36
<35
<32
<31
<16
<16
<16
<26
<16
<45
<45
<16
<46
<14
<47
<47
<46
<15
<46
<<3
<3
<3
<3
<2
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<1
<1
<3
<1
<4
<4
<1
<4
<1
<4
<4
<4
<1
<4
<6
<7
<7
<4
<7
<4
<7
<6
<6
<6
<6
<3 c3
<3
<6
<3
<8
<8 c3
<8 c3
<8
<8
<8
<3
<8
<3 c3
<3
<2
<3
<2
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<2
<2
<3
<1
<4
<4
<4
<1
<4
<4
<4
<4
<3
<4
<4
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<1
<3
<4
<4
<4
<1
<4
<4
<4
<4
<6
<6
<6
<4
<6
<5
<6
<6
<6
<6
<6
<3
<3
<3
<6
<3
<8
<8 c3
<8
<7
<9
<8
<3
<8
<6
<6
<6
<4
<6
<4
<5
<6
<6
<6
<5
<3 c3
<3
<5
<3
<8
<7
<3
<7
<7
<7
<7
<3
<7
<3
<3
<4
<2
<3
<2
<3
<3
<4
<3
<4
<2
<3
<2
<5
<5
<5
<1
<4
<5
<4
<4
<3
<4
<4 c3
<4
<4
<3 c3
<3
<3
<2
<2
<2
<3
<2
<5
<5
<2
<5
<2
<5
<5
<5
<?
<5
<29
<30
<30
<22
<29
<22
<30
<29
<29
<30
<28
<13
<14
<14
<25
<14
<37
<37
<14
<38
<11
<36
<39
<37
<14
<37
<4
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<4
<3
<3
<3
<2
<2
<3
<5
<5
<5
<1
<5
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<3
<3
<<3
<3
<4
<4
<4
<3
<1
<2
<1
<4
<1
<4
<4
<2
<4
<1
<5
<5
<4
<2
<4
<15
<19
<18
<9
<18
<8
<15
<16
<16
<15
<15
<8
<7
<7
<10
<7
<21
<22
<7
<22
<8
<23
<23
<22
<8
<21
<8
<8
<7
<23
<8
<5
<7
<7
<7
<6
<7
<3
<3
<3
<7
<3
<11
<11
<3
<11
<3
<11
<11
<11
<3
<11
<30
<<30
<31
<23
<30
<23
<31
<31
<30
<30
<29
<13
<13
<13
<30
<13
<45
<45
<13
<45
<10
<45
<46
<45
<13
<45
<6
<7
<6
<5
<6
<5
<7
<7
<7
<6
<6
<3
<3
<3
<6
<3
<8 c9 c3
<9
<3
<9
<8
<8 c3
<9 Allvalues given as < are less than LLD corrected for decay.
(37)
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-7 Circ. Outlet Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Results in pCi/Liter Between Dates Of 7Be 51Cr 54Mn 59Fe 58Co 60Co 65Zn 95Zr 95Nb 103Ru 106Ru 134Cs 137Cs 140Ba 141Ce 144Ce 226Ra 30-Dec 13-Jan 274an 10-Feb 24-Feb 10-Mar 24-Mar 7-Apr 21-Apr 54lay 19-May 2Jun 1&Jun 3Mun 1@Jul 2&Jut Aug 25-Aug 8-Sep 22<ep 6-Oct Oct 3-Nov 17-Nov 1-Dec 15-Dec 1&Jan 274an 10-Feb 24-Feb 10-Mar 24-Mar 7-Apr 21-Apr 5-May 19-May 24un 1&Jun 3Mun 14Jul 2&Jut 11-Aug 25-Aug 8-Sep 22-Sep 6-Oct 20-Oct 3-Nov 17-Nov 1-Dec 15-Dec 29-Dec
<29
<31
<23
<26
<25
<31
<<31
<28
<32
<30
<14
<36
<14
<14
<27
<16
<37
<40
<41
<15
<39
<39
<15
<36
<43
<40
<34
<34
<28
<<30
<31
<34
<34
<35
<35
<33
<16
<37
<15
<16
<31
<18
<45
<46
<46
<16
<46 (46
<16
<43
<47
<44
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<1
<<3
<1
<3
<4
<4
<4
<2
<4
<4
<1
<4
<4
<4
<6
<6
<5
<5
<5
<7
<6
<6
<6
<3
<6
<3
<3
<6
<4
<8
<8
<8
<<3
<8
<<9
<3
<7
<8
<8
<3
<3
<<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<2
<3
<1
<3
<2
- <4
<4
<4
<1
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<3
<4
<<3
<3
<3
<3
<4
<3
<3
<2
<3
<1
<1
<3
<2
<4
<4
<4
<1
<4
<4
<1
<4
<4
<4
<6
<6
<5
<6
<5
<7
<6
<7
<6
<6
<3
<7
<3
<3
<5
<3
<8
<8
<8
<3
<8
<7
<3
<7
<8
<7
<5
<6
<5
<6
<5
<7
<6
<6
<<3
<3
<3
<<3
<3
<3
<3
<6
<3
<3
<6
<3
<8
<7
<8
<7
<7
<<3
<7
<7
<8
<2
<4
<2
<2
<3
<2
<4
<5
<5
<1
<4
<5
<2
<4
<4
<4
<6
<3
<6
<3
<4
<4
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<4
<4
<4
<2
<4
<2
<3
<2
<5
<5
<5
<2
<5
<5
<2
<5
<5
<5
<29
<29
<23
<31
<23
<30
<27
<27
<31
<32
<15
<33
<13
<14
<25
<15
<36
<38
<37
<13
<37
<38
<14
<37
<38
<37
<3
<4
<3
<3
<3
<4
<3
<4
<3
<3
<4
<3
<2
<5
<4
<5
<2
<4
<4
<2
<4
<4
<5
<4
<4
<3
<4
<3
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<2
<4
<1
<2
<3
<2
<5
<4
<5
<5
<5
<4
<4
<4
<15
<16
<14
<12
<18
<16
<17
<16
<16
<15
<8
<16
<8
<8
<15
<8
<22
<21
<8
<20
<22
<8
<22
<20
<21
<7
<8
<6
<6
<7
<7
<7
<7
<7
<7
<4
<8
<3
<3
<7
<4
<11
<11 (11
<3
<11
<11
<3
<11
<11
<11
<30
<32
<24
<29
<24
<30
<31
<30
<31
<30
<13
<35
<13
<13
<31
<15
<45
<45
<45
<13
<45
<45
<13
<44
<44
<45
<7
<6
<5
<7
<5
<6
<6
<6
<7
<7
<3
<7
<3
<<3
<6
<3
<8
<8
<8
<3
<8
<8
<3
<9
<8
<8 Allvalues given as ( are less than LLD corrected for decay.
(38)
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-8 Russell Station Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Results in pCi/Liter Month of 7Be 51Cr 54Mn 59Fe 58Co 60Co 65Zn 95Zr 95Nb 103Ru 106Ru 134Cs 137Cs 140Ba 141Ce 144Ce 226Ra Jan-93 Feb-93 Mar-93 Apr-93 May-93 Jun-93 Jul-93 Aug-93 Sep-93 Oct-93 Nov-93 Dec-93
<30
<30
<3
<6
<29
<31
<3
<6
<31
<32
<3
<5
<26
<31
<3
<6
<16
<15
<2
<3
<13
<14
<1
<3
<14
<15
<1
<3
<13
<13
<2
<3
<38
<40
<4
<7
<38
<39
<4
<7
<13
<14
<2
<3
<12
<13
<1
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<2
<1
<2
<4
<4
<1
<1
<3
<4
<3
<3
<2
<4
<4
<2
<6
<7
<7
<6
<4
<3
<3
<3
<8
<8
<3
<3
<5
<6
<5
<6
<4
<2
<3
<3
<7
<7
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<1
<1
<2
<4
<4
<1
<1
<3
<3
<3
<3
<2
<2
<2
<5
<5
<2
<30
<29
<28
<29
<14
<13
<14
<13
<39
<39
<13
<14
<4
<4
<4
<3
<2
<2
<2
<2
<5
<4
<2
<4
<4
<4
<4
<2
<2
<5
<4
<1
<13
<13
<13
<12
<6
<6
<7
<6
<16
<17
<6
<5
<7
<7
<7
<7
<3
<3
<3
<3
<10
<10
<3
<3
<29
<30
<29
<29
<15
<13
<14
<13
<44
<45
<13
<13
<7
<7
<6
<6
<4
<3
<4
<3
<8
<8
<<3
<3 Allvalues given as < are less than LLD corrected for decay.
(39)
Rochester d Electric Table 3-9 Tap Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Results in pCi/Liter Month of 78e 51Cr 54Mn 59Fe 58Co 60Co 65Zn 95Zr 95Nb 103Ru 106Ru 134Cs 137Cs 1408a 141Ce 144Ce 226Ra Jan-93 Feb-93 Mar-93 Apr-93 May-93 Jun-93 Jul-93 Aug-93 Sep-93 Oct-93 Nov-93 Dec-93
<27
<30
<3
<5
<26
<28
<3
<5
<29 (28
<3
<5
<24
<29
<3
<6
<26
<28
<3
<6
<25
<29
<3
<6
<14
<14
<2
<3 (27 (26
<3
<6
<12
<13
<1
<3
<37
<40
<4
<7
<36
<39
<4
<7
<37
<40
<4
<7
<3
<3
<3
<3
<2
<3
<2
<3
<1
<4
<4
<4
<3
<3
<3
<3
<1
<4
<4
<4
<6
<6
<5
<6
<6
<5
<3
<6
<3
<8
<7
<8
<5
<5
<5
<6
<3
<5
<2
<5
'<2
<6
<7
<6
<3
<3
<3
<5
<3
<3
<<1
<4
<4
<4
<3
<<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<2
<3
<1
<4
<4
<5
<28
<27
<29
<30
<28
<29
<15
<27
<14
<36
<<38
<38
<4
<3
<4
<4
<3
<3
<2
<3
<4
<4
<4
<4
<3
<4
<4
<4
<3
<<3
<2
<5
<4
<4
<11
<11
<12
<12
<11
<12
<6
<11
<5
<15
<15
<16
<6
<6
<6
<6
<6
<6
<3
<7
<3
<10
<10
<10
<29
<29
<31
<30
<30
<<30
<14
<30
<13
<45
<45
<44
<7
<7
<7
<7
<6
<6
<4
<6
<3
<9
<8
<8 Allvalues given as < are less than LLD corrected for decay.
(40)
Rochester d Electric N
Table 3-10 Well "B"Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Results in pCi/Liter Month of 7Be 51Cr 54Mn 59Fe 58Co 60Co 65Zn 95Zr 95Nb 103Ru 106Ru 134Cs 137Cs 140Ba 141Ce 144Ce 226Ra Jan-93 Feb-93 Mar-93 Apr-93 May-93 Jun-93 Jul-93 Aug-93 Sep-93 Oct-93 Nov-93 Dec-93
<28
<30
<4
<6
<21
<23
<2
<5
<27
<31
<3
<6
<29
<29
<3
<5
<14
<15
<2
<3
<16
<16
<2
<3
<12
<13
<1
<3
<34
<38
<4
<7
<12
<14
<2
<3
<35
<38
<4
<7
<36
<38
<4
<7
<3
<3
<7
<5
<3
<3
<7
<3
<4
<7
<2
<2
<3
<2
<2
<3
<1
<2
<3
<4
<4
<9
<1
<2
<3
<4
<4
<8
<4
<4
<8
<6
<4
<5
<6
<3
<3
<7
<7
<7
<3
<3
<2
<1
<4
<1
<4
<4
<2
<3
<3
<2
<2
<4
<2
<4
<4
<22
<32
<30
<15
<15
<14
<40
<14
<38
<37
<3
<4
<4
<2
<2
<2
<4
<2
<5
<5
<29
<4
<4
<3
<4
<4
<2
<5
<2
<5
<5
<4
<9
<12
<12
<6
<7
<5
<15
<6
<15
<15
<7
<5
<7
<7
<3
<3
<3
<10
<3
<10
<10
<24
<31
<32
<15
<15
<14
<45
<13
<46
<45 26+7 40+9 28110 34+4 24+4 26e4 26i8 12a4 21+8 28+9
<31 30a10 Allvalues given as ( are less than LLDcorrected for decay.
- Well pump inoperable (41 )
Rochester d Electric Table 3-11 Deer Creek Water Gamma Isotopic Analyses Results in pCi/Liter Month of 7Be 51Cr 54Mn 59Fe 58Co 60Co 65Zn 95Zr 95Nb 103Ru 106Ru 134Cs 137Cs 140Ba 141Ce 144Ce 226Ra Jan-93 Feb-93 Mar-93 Apr-93 May-93 Jun-93 Jul-93 Aug-93 Sep-93 Oct-93 Nov-93 Dec-93
<26
<27
<26
<26
<13
<25
<25
<36
<39
<13
<37
<3Q
<3
<5
<31
<3
<6
<30
<3
<5
<28
<3
<6
<13
<1
<3
<28
<3
<6
<26
<3
<6
<4Q
<4
<7
<38
<4
<7
<14
<1
<3
<38
<4
<7
<3
<3
<3
<4
<4
<1
<4
<3
<4
<3
<3
<3
<3
<3
<4
<4
<6
<6
<7
<7
<3
<6
<5
<8
<9
<3
<8
<5
<5
<5
<6
<3
<5
<5
<7
<6
<7
<3
<3
<3
<3
<1
<3
<3
<4
<4
<4
<3
<3
<3
<3
<1
<3
<3
<4
<4
<4
<30
<28
<31
<29
<13
<29
<28
<39
<36
<13
<<39
<3
<4
<4
<4
<2
<3
<3
<4
<5
<5
<4
<4
<4
<3
<2
<2
<3
<5
<4
<1
<5
<12
<12
<12
<12
<5
<11
<11
<15
<14
<5
<14
<6
<6
<7
<7
<3
<7
<6
'10
<9
<3
<9
<31
<31
<31
<30
<13
<30
<29
<44
<45
<13
<45 16+8 17+8 19+8 12+7 12+3
<7
<7
<9
<10 5+4
<9 Allvalues given as ( are less than LLDcorrected for decay.
(42)
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-12 A Environmental Water Samples Tritium Analysis Results in pCi/L Month of
'anuary February March Russell
<439
<100
<442 O.W.D.
<434
<475
<416 Circ In
<443
<478
<413
<435
<434
<482
<475
<423
<420 Circ Out Deer Creek Tap
<438
<129 283 g 251-Well
'B'442
<418 April
-May June
<505
<506
<520
<497
<509
<521
<505
<515
<519
<504
<509
<529
<501
<513
<519
<504
<502
<521
<498
<512
<524 July August September October November December
<495
<549
<508
<567
<525
<521
<492
<547
<511
<572
<529
<521
<501
<547
<504
<568
<521
<526
<495
<549
<511
<564-
<513
<529
<494
<551
<506
<559
<558
<522
<497
<555
<510
<561
<520
<525
<498
<555
<506
<561
<519
<521 Allvalues given as < are less than the LLD corrected for decay.
- Well pump inoperable.
(43)
~
1
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-12 8 Fallout Tritium Analysis Results in pCi/L Month of January February March Station 3
<435
<536
<423 Station 5
<439
<538
<426 Station 8
<436
<535
<424 Station 10
<439
<533
<428 Station 12
<442
<540
<421 April May June
<503
<514
<521
<506
<509
<521
<505
<509
<526
<502
<509
<522
<506
<509
<526 July August September October November December
<497
<557
<506
<548
<524
<519
<499
<552
<506
<550
<526
<501
<556
<512
<564
<528
<531
<500
<553
<509
<566
<529
<530
<497
<553
<508
<571
<525
<525 Allvalues given as < are less than the LLD corrected for decay.
- Sample unobtainable.
(44)
Rochester nd Electric Table 3-13 Iodine in Water Results in pCi/L Month of January February March Russell
<.59
<.65
<.59 O.W.D.
<.50
<.83
<.42 Circ. In
<.52
<.58
<.42 Circ. Out
<.56
<.54
<.54 Deer Creek
<.50
<.52
<.51 Tap
<.50
<.53
<.50 April May June July August September October November December
<.55
<.74
<.75
<.31
<.34
<.45
<.32
<.32
<.32
<.50
<.48
<.42
<.29
<.65
<.42
<.29
<.67
< ~ 50
<.49
<.54
<.44
<.32
<.29
<.29
<.64
<.35
<.52
<.41
<.53
<.29
<.63
<.29
<.63
<.29
<.63
<.51
<.49
<.63
<.44
<.46
<.63
<.29
<.62
<.29
<.51
<.52
<.52
<.67
<.49
<.32
<.40
<.32
<.63 Allvalues given as < are less than the LLD corrected for decay
- No sample collected, pump inoperable
~
3.4 Milk 3 There are three dairy herds located three to five miles from the plant.
Milk samples are collected monthly during November through May from one of the three and biweekly during June through October from each.
A control farm sample is taken for each monthly sample and once during each biweekly period.
The milk is analyzed for iodine-131 and also gamma scanned for major fission products.
Allpositive counts and the 2 sigma error are reported. Allnegative counts after background correction are reported as <LLD for that analysis.
During 1993, no samples indicated positive l-131 activity that exceeded the LLD for the analysis.
Table 3-14 is a listing of all samples collected during 1993.
The annual dose to the thyroid of an infant which could result from the measured plant release rate, was calculated by the method described in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual using equation 13. The calculation is done for releases during the growing season when cows may be grazing.
For R.E.
Ginna, this includes only releases during the months of May through October.
The maximum resultant annual thyroid dose for 1993 would be 0.035 mrem using the cow-milk-infant pathway for a hypothetical farm at the site boundary.
Using the real farm with the highest D/Q which is 5 miles from the plant, the maximum calculated dose to the infant is 1.91E-4 mrem from plant releases during the growing season.
The annual average plant release rate during the grazing season would give a concentration of < 0.0006 pCi/liter of iodine-131 in milk at this real farm. This concentration is equal to <0.2% of the LLD for this analysis.
(46)
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC Table 3-14 Milk Results in pCi/Liter Farm Date l-131 Cs-137 Ba-140 K-40 8
D A
D C
0 8
D A
D C
8 D
A C
8 D
A C
8 D
C A
8 0
C A
A 8
D C
A 8
D C
A 8
D C
A 8
0 C
A 8
D C
A 8
0 C
A 8
D C
A D
8 D
124an 1Man 11-Feb 17-Feb 19-Mar 22-Mar 13-Apr 15-Apr 18-May 20-May 1-Jun Mun Mun 10dun 154un 174un 224un 2&Jun 29-Jun 1-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 1Mul 15-Jul 20dul ZWut
~ul 274ul 29-Jul 3-Aug 5-Aug 10-Aug 12-Aug 17-Aug 19-Aug 24.Aug 26-Aug 31-Aug 2-Sep 7-Sep 9-Sep 14.Sep 16-Sep 21-Sep 23-Sep 28-Sep 30-Sep 5-Oct 7-Oct 12-Oct 14-Oct 19-Oct 21-Oct 26-Oct 28-Oct 1O-Nov 12-Nov 21-Dec 21-Dec
<.56
<.55
<.64
<.53
<.53
<.53
<.57
<.53
<.56
<.55
<.65
<.70
<.53
<.61
<.54
<.51
<.55
< ~ 54
<.54
<.55
<.55
<.53
<.54
<.47
<.62
<.40
<.63
<.62
<.30
<.47
<.31
<.31
<.30
<.31
<.32
<.32
<.31
<.86
<.33
<.41
<.32
<.30
<.29
<.32
<.32
<.31
<.66
<.63
<.40
<.32
<.40
<.32
<.30
<.31
<.68
<.32
<.31
<.32
<.68
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<4
<3
<4
<4
<4
<4
<2
<2
<4
<3
<6
<4
<2
<2
<4
<4
<2
<2
<2
<4
<4
<5
<4
<5
<2
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5'5
<<2
<2
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<2
<5
<2
<5
<13
<13
<13
<12
<12
<12
<12
<10
<13
<13
<11
<12
<<5
<6
<7
<6
<6
<11
<8
<6
<18
<7
<15
<7
<6
<5
<12
<11
<7
<6
<7
<7
<13
<11
<16
<16
<17
<6
<6
<17
<16
<16
<17
<17
<16
<16
<6
<5
<16
<16
<15
<17
<17
<17
<6
<7
<16
<6
<16 1360 1390 1390 1380 1300 1430 1420 1400 1280 1370 1350 1330 1380 1400 1480 1420 1330 1340 1450 1400 1420 1390 1420 1510 1420 1370 1380 1270 1420 z 1400 1380 1300 1460 1300 1590 1300 1380 1400 1420 1320 1390 1330 1380 1350 1320 1390 1350 1190 1350 1380 1270 1350 1290 1440 1300 1440 1270 1530 1320 140 110 120 110 110 120 120 100 110 110 110 100 60 140 60 60 60 130 70 60 60 60 140 60 60 60 138 130 60 60 60 130 110 110 100 130 110 60 60 130 110 110 100 130 100 100 60 60 110 100 100 50 100 100 60 140 100 60 110 Allvalues given as < are less than the LLDcorrected for decay.
(47)
3.5 Fi hS Indicator fish are caught in the plume from the Discharge Canal and tested for radioactivity ingested from liquid effluent releases from the plant. The fish are filleted to represent that portion which would normally be eaten.
Additional fish are caught more than 15 miles away to be used=as background indicators and are prepared in the same manner.
Four different species of fish are analyzed during each half year from the indicator and background locations if they are available.
There was no real difference in the activity of the fish caught between the indicator and background locations.
Isotopic gamma concentrations (pCi/wet kilogram) are listed in Tables 3-15A, 3-1 5B.
Samples of algae (cladophora) and sand were obtained from the lake bottom in the discharge plume area.
Results of the gamma scan are included in Table 3-16.
Fish are caught by an outside group and were given to us after being held for extended periods for counting by gamma scan.
The LLD value for the shorter half life isotopes became large.
This is the case for most of the chromium, iodine and barium data in the table.
The data is also affected by small fish samples (< 2000 grams) in some species.
We have stressed the need to have fish sooner for future samples and holding time has been reduced to less than one week.
(48)
i
Rochester d Electric Table 3-15 Fish Samples Results in pCi/kgm Wet Description Indicator Fish First Half 1993 40K 51Cr 54Mn 59Fe 58Co 60Co 65Zn 95Zr 95Nb Carp Rainbow Trout Brovm Trout Lake Trout 2604 g 110
<85 4802 g 283
<131 3647 g 186
<137 3761 g 150
<98
<4
<9
<6
<5
<16
<26
<23
<21
<5
<10
<8
<6
<4
<9
<6
<5
<10
<20
<15
<13
<9
<19
<15
<12
<8
<14
<12
<9 Second Half 1993 Brovm Trout Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Smallmouth Bass 3607 g 196
<107 3015 g 196
<311 4012 g 196
<292 3503 g 468
<1261
<8
<14
<8
<28
<43
<42
<136
<9
<14
<12
<46
<<8
<7
<<8
<25
<22
<23
<<61
<17
<26
<<24
<90
<11
<26
<25
<87 Background Fish First Half 1993 Carp Perch Fresh Water Drum Sucker 3469 g 156
<116 2826 g 244
<158 3355 g 140
<45 3751 g 587
<402
<5
<8
<4
<21
<29
<11
<65
<7
<10
<4
<28
<6
<9
<5
<21
<13
<19
<11
<45
<11
<20
<8
<49
<10
<16
<5
<38 Second Half 1993 Chinook Salmon Lake Trout Coho Salmon Brown Trout 4134 + 186 1801
~ 232 3271 g 482 4208 g 360
<140 (117
<343
<93
<7
<11
<<27
<4
<23
<58
<18
<9
<12
<28
<5
<7
<12
<28
<4
<20 (26
<57
<10
<15
<21
<<49
<9
<10
<12
<34
<9 Allvalues given as <<: are less than the LLD corrected for decay (49)
Rochester d Electric Table 3-15 Fish Samples Results in pCI/kgm Wet Description Indicator Fish First Half 1993 103Ru 106RU 131 I 134Cs 137CS 140Ba 141Ce 144Ce 226Ra Carp Rainbow Trout Brown Trout Lake Trout
<7 (13
<11
<9
<32
<78
<52
<46
<198
<90
<236 (175
<4
<9
<6
<5 13+4 52 g15 21 +7 19 + 4 (142
<123
<187 (137 (16
<26
<25 (18
<28
<74
<53
<38 11+6 (17
<12
<10 Second Half 1993 Brown Trout Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Smallmouth Bass
<11
<22
<80
<78
<78
<79
<269
<38
<1380
<1455 n/a
<9
<10
<9
<28 35 g 10 22 + 8 44+
10 26 g16
<69 (671
<657
<327 (25
<60
<55
<185
<81
<90
<83
<<228 (16 (16
<16 (52 Background Fish First Half 1993 Carp Perch Fresh Water Drum Sucker (10
<14
<<5
<<36
<43
<79
<37 (193
<247
<189 (14
<466 5 g6
<9
<5 (24 20 + 6 22 + 10 42g6
<25 (195 (182
<28
<461
<20
<31
<9
<70
<37 (72
<31
<156 16g8
<15 12 + 8
<43 Second Half 1993 Chinook Salmon Lake Trout Coho Salmon Brown Trout
<10
<13 (32 (8
<7
<115
<<240
<30
<<44
<16
<95 (280
<<8
<12
<28
<<4 33g8 23 + 10
<70 23g4 (80
<<47 (189
<22 (61
<73
<96
<209
<15
<25
<52 Allvalues given as < are less than the LLD corrected for decay (50)
Rochester d Electric Table 3-16 Lake Samples Results in pCi/kgm Description Cladophora Lake Bottom 40K 2093 + 82 9133 g 100 51Cr
<24 54Mn 59Fe
<6
<7 58Co 60Co
<3
<3 65Zn
<7
<7 95Zr 95Nb
<3 Description Ciadophora Lake Bottom 103Ru 106RU
<2 131I 8+2
<4 134Cs
<4 14g2 137Cs 140Ba 8+4
<9 26 g2
<11 141Ce
<6 144Ce
<28 226Ra 9 g6 139 g8 Allvalues given as ( are less than the LLD corrected for decay
fl
3.6 Ve etation Sam les Crops are grown on the plant property and samples of the fruits and grains are collected at harvest time for testing.
Background samples are purchased from farms greater than 10 miles from the plant.
There was no indication in the samples of any measurable activity other than naturally occuring K-40. Gamma isotopic data is given in Table 3-17.
(52)
Rochester and Electric Table 3-17 Vegetation Samples Results in pCi/kgm Wet Description Lettuce Apples Cherries Grapes Squash Com 40K 3880 g 300 870 + 46 1520 g 70 1880 g 130 2290 g 115 2390 g 90 51Cr
<107
<14
<18
<52
<28
<<21 54Mn
<13
<2
<<6
<4
<3 59Fe
<24
<4
<5
<12
<7
<6 58Co
<13
<6
~<4
<3 60Co
<13
<2
<3
<6
<4
<3 65Zn
<30
<4
<5
<14
<9
<<7 95Zr
<20
<3
<4
<10
<6
<5 95Nb
<12
<2
<2
<<6
<4 Control Vegetation Samples Lettuce Apples Squash 2210 + 170
<<69 745 g 45
<18 2330 g 80
<20
<8
<2
<3
<16
<4
<6
<8
<2
<2
<8
<3
<18
<4
<6
<13
<3
<4
<7
<2
<2 Description Lettuce Apples Cherries Grapes Squash Com 103Ru
<12
<6
<<3 2
106Ru
<114
<14
<19
<54
<30
<24 131I
<14
<<2
<7
<4
<3 134Cs
'<13
<<7
<4
<3 137Cs
<14
<2
<2
<7
<4 140Ba
<43 (6
<7
<21
<13
<10 141 Ce
<3
~ <4
<13
<6
<5 144Ce
<95
<14
<17
<60
<26
<21 226Ra
<33
<4
<5
<13
<7
<5 Control Vegetation Samples Lettuce Apples Squash
<8
<2
<69
<15
<8
<4
<3
<9
<2
<3
<8
<2
<3
<27
<10
<9
<17
<78
<4
<14
<4
<19
<15
<4
<<5 Allvalues given as <<: are less than LLD corrected for decay (53)
3.7 External Penetratin Radiation Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) with a sensitivity of 5 millirem/quarter are placed as part of the environmental monitoring program.
Thirty-nine TLD badges are currently placed in four rings around the plant.
These rings range from less than 1000 feet to 15 miles and have been dispersed to give indications in each of the nine land based sectors around the plant should an excessive release'occur from the plant.
Badges are changed and read after approximately 3 months exposure.
TLD location ¹7 is influenced by its close proximity to the Contaminated Equipment Storage Area established in 1983 and will normally read 20-40 mRem/quarter.
For the year of 1993, omitting location 7, on-site exposure ranged between 9.4 -15.4 mrem/quarter, with an average exposure of 13.4 mrem/quarter and off-site 9.6 - 15.2 mrem/quarter with an average exposure of 12.1 mrem/quarter.
Table 3-18 gives TLD readings for each quarter.
A trend chart with a comparison of data for each location for the years of 1992 and 1993 is included. The data plotted is the average quarterly dose measured.
The NRC also obtains TLD measurements around the plant.
The following is a comparison of the data for each quarter of 1993 using NRC data from NUREG-0837 Vol. 12, No. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Results in mrem/quarter:
Ginna NRC 1 st 2nd 3rd 4th
( 2 miles 12.1 13.5 14.0 13.8 2-5 miles 11.1 13.1 13.0 12.8
) 5 miles 10.8 12.4 11.9 12.0 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 11.8 14.5 14.9 13.5 11.7 13.8 14.1 12.4 12.5 14.4 14.1 13.6 There are five stations that are colocated.
The differences in the comparison of colocated TLDs may be because the NRC uses model 801 TLDs and Ginna uses model 814s.
These comparisons are:
A B
C D
E F
10.9 13.4 10.3 12.7 10.6 11.7 10.8 12.2 10.8 11
~ 5 10.0 11.1 13.3 13.2 11.7 11.7 12.0 11.9 13.6 13.2 11.9 11.7 11.1 11.0 16.3 12.9 12.9 15.6 10.7 13.7 1 1.7 1 2.3 12.4 13.8 14.8 15.2 15.1 16.0 14.3 14.5 12.6 14.1 11.1 14.4 13.5 Dosimeter Missing (54)
¹2- ¹7 plus ¹13 are on-site near the line of the highest annual average ground level concentration.
¹8- ¹12 are offsite at a distance of 8 to 15 miles.
¹14- ¹16 are located along a line 3000 ft. west of the plant.
¹17- ¹21 are located along Lake Road.
¹22- ¹24 are located along the east site boundary tine.
¹25- ¹30 are offsite at a distance of 8 to 15 miles.
¹31 - ¹40 are located in an arc at a distance of4-5 miles.
Location 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Table 3-18 External Penetrating rmoluminescent Dosi Units mRem/91 Day Q Radiation metry 1992 The uarter gnnduatter 13.6 13.9
~udder g 3.0
+ 3.1
+ 3.1
+ 33
+ 2.4 g 4.2
+ 2.7
+ 2.5
+27
+ 2.9
+ 3.0 g 3.4
+ 2.8 a 33
+ 3.0 g 2.9 k32
+ 3.2
+ 3.0
+ 3.0
+ 3.0 g 3.0 g 3.1 g 2.7 g 2.6 g 2.7
+ 2.8 g 2.8 g 2.4
+ 2.8 g 2.6
+ 2.9 g 2.9 g 2.8 i 27
+ 2.8 g 3.0 k 27 g 2.7 12.0 12.3 12.3 13.3 9.4 16.8 10.9 10.0 10.6 11.6 12.0 13.4 11.0 13.0 12.1 11.6 12.6 12.6 12.0 11.8 12.0 12.0 12.1 10.7 10.3 10.7 11.3 10.9 9.6 10.9 10.3 11.7 11.5 11.2 10.6 11.1 12.1 10.8 10.8 g 3.4 g 3.5 g 3.6
+ 3.8 f 3.2
+ 5.2
+31 g 2.8 g 3.1 3,1 g 2.9
+ 37
+ 3.0 g 3.5 g 3.4
+ 33
+ 3.9
+ 32
+ 3.3
+ 3.5 g 3.3 g 3.0 232 g 3.1
+ 3.2
+ 3.5
+ 3.8 g 3.1 g 2.6
+ 3.4
+ 32 237 g 3.5 3,7 g 3.0 g 2.9
+ 3.8
+ 3.1
+ 2.9 14.4 15.2 12.5 12.1 11.1 12.2 12.3 11.6 14.8 12.0 13.8 13.3 13.0 15.4
-12.8 12.9 14.0 12.9 12.0 12.6 12.3 12.9 13.8 15.0 12.4 10.3 13.4 12.7 14.6 14.0 14.6 11.7 11.6 15.2 12.2 11.5 Rochester d Electric
~3rd uarter 133 k 33 14.5 + 3.6 14.2 g 3.6 15.1
+ 3.8 12.4
+ 3.1 22.0 + 5.5 12.7 + 3.2 11.1
+ 2.8 11.4 + 2.9 12.0 g 3.0 11.2 g 2.8 15.3
+ 3.9 13.4 g 3.4 14.4 + 3.6 14.6 g 3.7 12.8 + 3.2 14.9 + 3.8 13.6 + 3.4 14.3 + 3.6 13.9 + 3.5 13.0 g 3.3 14.1 g 3.5 14.1
+ 3.6 11.9 2 3.0 11.3 g 2.8 12.8 + 3.2 14.1 g 3.6 12.3 f 3.1 10.5 + 2.6 13.3 g 3.4 11.7 2 2.9 13.9 g 3.5 13.7 2 3,5 14.6 g 3.7 12.0 g 3.0 12.1 g 3.1 13.7 g 3.5 13.6 g 3.4 11.9 2 3.0 4th uarte 13.4
+ 3.4 14.0 2 3.5 14.1 g 3.6 14A + 3.6 12.2 g 3.1 22.0 + 5.5 12.6
+ 3.2 11.0 g 2.8 11.7 2 3.0 11.9 2 3.0 11.0 g 2.8 14.7
+ 3.7 131 2 33 14.5 g 3.6 14.4 g 3.6 13.1 a 33 14.5 + 3.6 13.6
+ 3.4 14.1
+ 3.6 14.2 + 3.6 13.4 g 3.4 13.9 2 3.5 13.7 g 3.5 11.8 g 3.0 10.9 g 2.8 12.8 + 3.2 13.8 + 3.5 12.2 g 3.1 12.1 g 3.0 13.2 g 3.3 11.7 + 2.9 132 + 33 132 2 33 13.6 g 3.4 11.9 2 3.0 12.4 g 3.1 13.9 + 3.5 13.2 + 3.3 11.7
+ 2.9 (55)
I
EXTERNALPENETRATING RADIATION 25.0 THERMOLUMINESCENTDOSIMETRY A 20.0 V
E m 150 R
e I 10.0 Q
T R
0.0 2
4 6
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 TLD LOCATION NUMBER
~ 1992 1993 (56)
4.0 LAND USE CENSUS A land use census is done each year to determine any major changes in the use of the land within 5 miles of the plant.
There were no major changes during 1993.
The land use remains mainly agricultural in nature.
There were several private homes constructed, but no new housing developments or large business construction projects.
The three dairy operations nearest the plant continued in operation with an average of 40 to 70 milking cows.
There are no goats used for milk on a regular basis within the 5 mile radius.
Beef cattle are still raised on 3 farms within 2 miles of the plant as in the past.
A copy of the Land Use Census is attached.
(57)
N P I
Qgf TREES
~ CABBAGE EK9 FALLOW
~ ORCHARDS
~ RECREATuNAL~AREAS LANDUSE CENSUS 1993 LEGEND
%L O'I F 4/
S A
L T
R 0
A 0
a S
K E
T ON 0
E 0
A 0
4 tt R
D 0
cttt E ~
R 0
A D
F U
R N
C E
0 A
'4 E rI,.
a 0
lACt WAY S
S M0 M
C R
E E
a T
U C
K A
H 0
E R
WOODS RO.
STAlE ROAD L
I N
E R
0 A
D L
I N
ROAD C
0 R L 0
A D
A HfNNESSEY RO.
e R
I G
H FREY ROAD C~C A
R 0
0 R
R 0
A 0
TRUMMONOS ROAD P
E A
S E
R 0
A D
C H
A p
E L
R 0
A 0
C N R~
R I
0 G
E E
0 0
Y EDDYRD.
SMITSIOLLROAD R0 A
D
B
5.0 EXTERNAL INFLUENCES During 1993, there were no external influences such as atmospheric weapons testing or accidents at other nuclear facilities which caused an influence on the data reported.
The annual trending graphs for air and water indicate a level effect in the measured activity.
6.0 EPA INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON STUDY An indication of the laboratory's ability to analyze samples and achieve results consistent with other laboratories is the aim of the EPA Interlaboratory Comparison., Selected unknowns are received and analyzed by our procedures and the results are sent to the EPA Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory.
A report is returned from them indicating the concentrations with which the samples were spiked and how we compared to other laboratories analyzing the same samples.
Table 6-1 is a tabulation of the Ginna results of samples analyzed during 1993.
Other than 1 sample, gross Beta/Alpha in water for January, the results were good.
A positive bias for beta that existed during 1991 and 1992 was corrected by calibrating the beta counter with a Cs-137 source rather than a Sr-90 source.
A calibration ofthe gamma detectors with a simulated sample standard corrected an earlier positive bias for gamma analysis.
Graphs showing a statistical analysis of the results of RGS.E's analysis and all reporting laboratories is included after the table. The sigma value is smaller than that calculated by EPA for a single laboratory.
The graphs indicate that our agreement with other laboratories for the analysis is good.
(59)
4 I'
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC TABLE6-1 EPA INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM - 1993 Description Date Sample Analysis Experimental Data EPA Value at Sigma Alpha/Beta in Water 1/29/93 (Results in pCI/1)
Alpha Beta 11 17 19 18 19 24 34 + 9 44g5 7/23/93 Alpha Beta 13 9
8 45 53 56 15 + 5 43g7 10/29/93 Alpha Beta 13 14 11 18 18 18 20g5 15g5 Gamma in Water (Results in pCi/I) 6/11/93 Co-60 Zn-65 Ru-106 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-133 18 14 18 112 110 100 106 98 117 4
4 4
6 6
6 105 103 104 15g5 103 2 10 119 g 12 5g5 5g5 99 g10 Co-60 Zn-65 Ru-106 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-133 29 29 31 145 148 155 167 150 162 55 56 51 42 46 46 82 78 83 30g5 150 g 15 201 g 20 59g5 40g5 79g8 iodine-131 in Water (Results in pCI/1) 10/8/93 I-131 I-131 112 114 103 113 114 110 100 g 10 117 g 12
'verage of results reported exceeding a2 sigma for EPA lab, see note at end of table.
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC TABLE6-1 (Cont'd)
EPA INTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM -1993 Description Date Sample Analysis Experimental Data EPA Value t1 Sigma AirFilters (Results in pCi/filter) 8/27/93 Alpha Beta Cs-137 24 23 23 52 53 53 13 15 11 19g5 47g5 9 g5 Milk (Results in pCI/1) '/24/93 I -131 Cs-137 K-40 114 114 115 47 47 49 1708 1727 1724 120 g 12 49g5 1679 2 84 Notes:
ALPHA/ BETA IN WATER - No apparent cause for under-reported value.
Alpha average value for all non-outlier respondents 17.1.
GAMMAIN WATER - Ru-106 data is low. Check of spectrum and calculation factors indicates no reason.
EPA lnterlaboratory Comparison Program, Gross Alpha-Beta EPA (non-outliers) pCIn pci/I Sam Ie/Month al ha beta
. Ginna pCi/I al ha pCi/I beta Normalized deviation of Ginna Mean from EPA Grand Average al ha beta Water/Jan 17.09 41.99 Water/July 12.06 37.65 Water/Oct 14.08 17.01 Filter/Aug 20.00 49.32 1 5.67 20.33 10.00 51.33 1 2.67 1 8.00 23.33 52.67
-0.27
-7.50
-0.48 1.61
-0.49 0.34 1.16 1.16 1993 Gross Alpha-Beta Trends 4.00 I
300 2.00 1.00 0.00
~ -1.00 g -2.00 g -3.00
-4.00 Water/Jan Water/July Water/Oct UCL LWL LCL Filter/Aug 8 alpha Q beta 62
i 8
II 0
EPA Intarlaboratory Comparison Program, Gamma Isotopic EPA fnon.outhersI pCi/I pCi/I pci/I pci/I pci/I mg/I pCi/I pCi/I Sam onth Ba-133 C~O Cs-134 Cs-137 I-131 K~
Ru.106 Zn45
'inna pCi/I pCI/I pCi/I pCi/I pci/I
's-133 Co-60 Cs.134 Cs-137 1.131 mg/I pCi/I pCi/I K&0 Ru-106 Zn-65 NormsIized Deviation of Ginna Mean from EPA Granul Average Bs-133 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 I-131 K&0 Ru-106 Zn-65 Water/Petr Water/June Water/Oct Water/Nov Milk/Sept Fi!ter/Aug 96.74 14.90 5.39 5.76 101.36 103.87 107.54 117.68 76.45 29.72 54.42 42.14 175.18 156.07 50.02 120.12 1674.07 10.00 104.00 16.67 4.00 6.00 109.67 107.00 107.33 112.33 81.00 29.67 54.00 44.67 159.67 149.33 47.67 114.33 1719.67 13.00 1.44 1.26 0.61
%.48 0.08 0.45
%.04
%.77 0.99
%.02
-0.14 0.88
-1.34
%.78
%.81
%.83 0.94 1.04 4.00 3.00
~8 2.00 Q
i.oo 0.00
~- -1.00 m -2.00 o
300 4.00 1993 Gamma Isotopic Trends imi 68-133 C3 Co-60 I/CL E! Cs-134 G Cs-137
~ 1-131 LWL 5! K-40 imil Ru-106 II H Zn-65 63