ML17297B607

Notifies of 820503-06 Pump & Valve Operability Review Team & Oct 1982 Seismic Qualification Review Team Onsite Audits. Encl Completed Forms for Each Piece of Equipment Selected Must Be Completed 2 Wks Prior to Audit

ML17297B607
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	07/06/1982
From:	Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
References
NUDOCS 8207120026
Download: ML17297B607 (25)

Text

JUL 6

1982 Docket Nos.:

50-528/50-529 and 50-530 Hr. E. E.

Van Brunt, Jr.

Vice President - Nuclear Projects Arizona Public Service Company Post Office Box 21666 Phoenix, Arizona 85036

Subject:

Audits by PVORT and'QRT - Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station To confirm the extent to which'afety-related equipment meets the re-quirements of the General Design Criteria of 10 CFR Part 50, the NRC staff, assisted by Technical A'ssistance Contractors, will conduct plant specific on-site audits by the Pump and Valve Operability Review Team (PVORT) and the Seismic Qualification Review Team (SQRT).

The purpose of the audits is to confirm the acceptability of the qualification pro-

cedures, and implementation of the procedures to all safety-related equipment based on the review of a few selected

'pieces.

Since the audits will be perfomed on a "sampling basis, it is necessary to ensure that 85 to 90 percent of the equipmen't is 'qualified and installed before the audits.

By letter, dated May 14, 1982. you submitted checklists which provide the qualification and installation status of sa'fety-related equipm nt for the Palo Verde plant.

The checklists were submitted to permit the staff to select those piec'es'f 'equipme'nt for which site audits will be conducted by PVORT and SQRT.

Confirming discussions wih t1r'. Terry Quan of your staff, the PVORT audit has been scheduled for August 3 -,6, 1982.

The pieces of equip-ment selected for audit are 1'isted in Enclosure 1.

In preparation for

.this audit, we request that 6io weeks prior to the start of the audit, you submit a completed form, 'shown as E'nclosure 2, for each piece of equipment listed in Enclosure""l.

At this time, the date for the'QRT audit has been tentatively scheduled for October, 1982.

Approximately one month prior to the actual date

selected, the staff will identify 'those pieces of equipment for audit by

~ SQRT.

At that time you will'be requested 'to submit, two weeks prior to the start of the audit, a completed "Qualificati'on Summary of Equipment" form (shown on pages 1-8 through 1-12 of your tray 14 checklist submittal) for each piece selected for SQRT audit, 8207i2002b 820706 PDR ADQC< 05000528 A

PDR OFFICEI SURNAME/

DATE/

NRC FORM 318 IIO/80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

• USGFO: I98~29.824

It ~

'I t

It

Po s

Hr. Van Brunt 4 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Project Manager, E. A. Lici'tra, (301)'92-7200.

Sincerely, Frank J. Hiraglia, Chief Licensing Branch Ho.

3 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

1.

PVORT Audit Items for Palo Verde 2.

Form, "Pump and Valve Assurance Review" cc w/enclosures:

See next page Operability Distribution:

Document Control 50-528/529/530 NRC PDR L PDR PRC NSIC LB¹3 Rdg.

JLee MLicitra

Attorney, OELD I&E ACRS (10)

OFFICED SURNAME)

DATEt1 LB¹3'L

. KI.44@<.

¹ L

...FB..

].ia...

~

07/

/82 NRC FORM 818110/80) NRCM 0240 OFFlCIAL RECORD COPY

• USGFO: 198~29.824

0 I,

A J

Il

'k I'

~"

Palo Verde Hr.

E.

E.

Van Brunt, Jr.

Vice President - Nuclear Projects Arizona Public Service Company P. 0.

Box 21666

Phoenix, Arizona 85036 CC:

Arthur C. Gehr, Esq.

Snell 8 Wilmer 3100 Valley Center

Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Charles S. Pierson Assistant Attorney General 200 State Capitol 1700 West Washington

Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Charles R. Kocher, Esq., Assistant Counsel James A. Boeletto, Esq.

Southern California Edison Company P. 0.

Box 800

Rosemead, California 91770 Margaret Walker Deputy Director of Energy Programs Economic Planning and Development Office 1700 West Washington

Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Hr.

Rand L. Greenfield Assistant Attorney General Bataan Hemorial Building Santa Fe, New Hexico 87503 Resident Inspector Palo Verde/NPS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Coranission P. 0.

Box 21324

Phoenix, Arizona 85001 Hs. Patricia Lee Hourihan 6413 S. 26th Street

Phoenix, Arizona Lynne A. Bernabei, Esq.

Harmon 8 Weiss 1725 I Street, N.W.

Suite 506, Washington, DC 20006

ENCLOSURE 1

'PVORT Audit Items for Palo Verde Item No.

~Com onent Cross Reference Identification

~So 1 ier

~Te 2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Pump Pump Valve Valve Val ve Val ve Val ve Val ve PE 012 PE 026 PE 102 PE 108 PE 065 PE 085 UV-401 UV-180 CHB-Pol S IA-Pol SI-655 SI-404 CH-505 SI-626 J605 M234A NSSS NSSS NSSS NSSS NSSS NSSS BOP BOP Charging Pump LPSI Pump Gate Check Globe Globe Butterfly Gate 9.

10.

12.

Pump Pump Valve Valve CTA-Pol H093 SPB-Pol M095 UV-3 P221A AFA-V-007 P221B BOP BOP BOP BOP Condensate Pump Essential Spray Pond Cooling Pump Globe Check

i, lj l

t

,t "

Enclosure' PUMP ANO VALVE OPERABILITY ASSURANCE REVIEW PLANT INFORMATION 1.

Name:

3.

U"ility:

4.

NSSS:

5.

A/E'.

Unit No.

2.

Docket No.:

[3 PWR [] BWR II.

GEHERAL COMPONENT* INFORMATION 1.

Supplier: [] NSSS [j BOP 2.

Location:

a.

Building/Room b.

Elevation c.

System 3.

Component number on in-house drawings:

4.

If component is a [] Pump complete II.5.

If component is a [j Valve complete II.6.

5.

General Pumo Oata a.

Pump b.

Prime-mover Mfg.

Model S/N iype Mfg.

Model S/N Type

\\

The component, whether pump or valve, is considered to be an ~assembl composed of the body, internals, prime-mover (or actuator) and functional accessories.

a.

Pump (continued)

-2" b.

Prime-mover (continued)

Size Size Weight ilounting Method Required B.H.P.

Parameter Oesien Press Oner at inn Weight Mounting Method H.P.

Power requirements:

(include

normal, maximum and minimum).

Electrical Temp Flow Head Other Required NPSH at maximum flow Available NPSH If MOTOR list:

Outy cycle Stall current Operating Speed Critical Speed

~ist functional accessories:*

Class of insulation List control signal inputs:

Functional accessories are those sub-components not supplied by the manufacturer that are required to make the pump assembly operational, (e.g., coupling, lubricating oil system, etc.)

J' 6.

General Valve Data a.

'ial ve b.

Actuator {I not an integra; unit)

Name Name Mfg.

Model S/N Type Size Model S/N Type Size Weight Mounting Method Weight Mount 1 ng Method Required Torq Ue Torque Parameter

~Desi n

Dneratinn Press Power requirements:

(include

normal, maximum and minimum).

Electrical Temp Max 4P across valve Closing time 9 max hP Opening time 9 max hP Other: [] Pneumatic I.j Hydraulic Power requirements for functional accessories, (if any)

List control signal inputs:

ll

List functional accessories:*

III. FUNCTION l.

Briefly describe components normal and safety functions:

2.

The components normal state is:

3.

Safety function:

a.

[] Emergency reactor shutdown c.

[] Containment isolation e;

[] Reactor core cooling

[] Operating

[] Standby b.

[] Containment heat removal d.

[] Reactor heat removal f.

[] Prevent significant release of radio-active material to environment g.

[] Does the ccmponent function to mitigate the consequences of one or more of the following events?

[] Yes [] Ho If "Yes", identify.

[] COCA

[] HELB

[] Other

[] i4SLB 4.

Saf ety requirements:

[] Intermittent Operation

[] During >astulaied event

[] Continuous Operation

[] Following postulated event If component operation 'is required following an event, give approximate length of time component must remain operational.

(e.g.,

hours, days, etc.)

Functional accessories are those sub-components not supalied b>

.he manufacturer that are required to make the valve assembly c~erationa1, (e.g., limit switches).

t

~

~

5.

For VALVES:

does the component

[j Fail open

[] Fail closed

[] Fail as is Is this the fail safe position?

[] Yes

[] No Is the valve used for throttling purposes?

["] Yes

[] No Is the valve part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary?

[] Yes

[] No Does the valve have a specific limit for leakage?

[] Yes

[] No If "Yes" give limit:

IV.

QUALIFICATION 1.

Reference by specific number those applicable sections of the design codes and standards applicable to the component:

Z.

Reference those qualification standards, used as a guide to qualify the component:

3.

Identify those parts of the above qualification standards deleted or modified in the qualification program.

Deleted:

Modified:

4, 5.

Have acceptance criterias be n established and documented in the test plan(s) for the component?

[] Yes

[] No r

What is the expected failure mode that would keep the pump or valve assembly from performing its safety function?

6.

Are the margins* identif ied in the qualification documentation?

[] Yes

[] No d.

Margin is the difference between design basis parameters and the test parameters used for equipment qualification.

If ccmponent is a

PUMP, complete IV.7.

If c~~ponent is a

VALVE, ccmplete IV.S.

7.

Pump operability has been demonstrated by:

[] Analysis

[j Test

[] Ccmbination Identify PUMP tests performed:

a.

[] Shell hydrostatic b.

(ASME Section III)

[j Hearing temperature evaluations C.

[] Seismic 1oading d.

[] Vibration levels e.

[] Exploratory vibration f.

(Fundamental free

)

[] Seal leakage 9 hydro press g.

[j Aging: [j Thermal

[] Mechanical h.

[] Flow performance Are curves provided [] Yes

[] No i.

[] Pipe reaction end j.

[] Others loads (nozzle loads) k.

[] Extreme environment:

[] Humidity

[] Chemical

[] Radiation 8.

Valve operability has been demonstrated by: [] Analysis

[] Test

[] Combination Identify VALVE tests performed:

a.

[] Shell hydrostatic b.

(ASME Section III)

[] Cold cyclic List times:

Open Closed c.

[] Sei smic 1 oadi ng d.

[] Hot cyclic List times:

Open Closed e.

[] Exploratory vibration f.

[] Main seat leakage (Fundamental free

}.

g.

[] Aging: [] Thermal h.

[] Back seat leakage

[] Mechanical i.

[] Pipe react-;or, end

~.

[j Disc hydrostatic loading k.

[] Extreme envir onmen 1.

[] Flow interruption capability

[] Humidity

[] Chemical

[] Radiation m.

[] Flow characteristics n.

[] Others Are curves provided?

[] Yes [] No 9.

As a result of any of the tests (or analysis),

were any deviations from design requirements identified? [] Yes [] No If "Yes", briefly describe any changes made in tests (or analysis) or to the component to correct the deviation.

10.

Was the test component precisely identical (as

.o model, size, etc.) to the in-plant component?

[] Yes [] No If "No", is installed component [] oversized or [] undersized?

1 l. If ~t e test was used to qualify the component, does the type test meet the requirements of IEEE 323-1974, Section 5.?

[] Yes [] No 12.

Is component orientation sensitive?

[] Yes [j No

[ I Unknown If "Yes", does installed orientation coincide with est orientation?

[] Yes [] No 13.

Is the component mounted in the same manner in-plant as it was during testing (i.e., welded, same number and size bolts, etc.)

[] Yes [] No [] Unknown

l

~

~

lt V

I

14.

Were the qualification tests performed in sequence and on ~on1 one component'?

[] Yes

[] No If "Yes" identify sequence, (e.g., radiaticn,

seismic, cyc'.-.c,

.hermal, etc.):

15.

If "aging"~ was performed, identify the significant aging mechanisms:

16.

Identify loads imposed (assumed) on the component for the qualification tests (analysis) performed:

a.

[] Plants (shutdown loads) b.

[] Extreme environment c.

[] Seismic load d.

[j Others 17.

Have component design specifications been reviewed in-house to assure they envelope all expected operating, transient, and

~

accident conditions?

[] Yes [] No 18.

Ooes the component utilize any unique or special materials?

(Examples are special gaskets or packing, limitations on nonferrous materials, or special coatings or surfaces.)

[] Yes [] No If "Yes", identify:

19.

Ooes component require any special maintenance procedures or practices, (including short r periods betwe n maintenance).

[] Yes [] No If "Yes", identify:

20.

Is the qualified life for the component less than 40 years?

[] Yes [] No If "Yes", what is the aualified li e?.

As outlined in Section 4.4.1 of IEEE-627 1980.

l C'

~

P

s ls is

~

~

~