ML17199T441
| ML17199T441 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 11/20/1987 |
| From: | Muller D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Butterfield L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, TAC-53667, TAC-53668, NUDOCS 8711250091 | |
| Download: ML17199T441 (4) | |
Text
(
~...
~f:* J Docket Nos~ 50-237 and 50-249
- Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr.
Nuclear Licenstng Manager Conunonwealth Edison Company Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690
Dear Mr. Butterfield:
November 20,~7 DI STR IBUTI ON:
D.o.c,k~.t Ei le s NRC PDR Local PDR PDI I I-2 r/f DMull er GHolahan LLuther MGrotenhuis OGC-Bethesda EJordan JPartlow ACRS (10)
POI 11-2 Gray DLasher
SUBJECT:
GENERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 2.2. PART 1 EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION -
ALL OTHER SAFETY RELATED EQUiPMENT (TACS 53667 AND 53668)
Re:
Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit Nos. 2 and 3 File We have completed our review of your response dated November 1, 1983 to Generic Letter 83-28 Item 2.2 Part 1.
He find that we*need the additional information described in the enclosure to this letter in order to complete our review.
Please provide that information within 60 days from the date of this letter, or, provide a schedule for the submittal of that information.
The reporting and/ot recordkeeping requirements contained iri this.letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under Pub L.96-511.
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page Office:
Surname:
Date:
LA/PD II I-u-1 LLuther cn?-
ll/13/87 Sincerely,
'!Da...'liel ;JZ. ]f.ui 1.,,.,..
~... *** \\J.\\.
Daniel R. Muller, Director Project Directorate III-2 Division of Reactor Projects III;
- IV, V and Special Project~
- cq PM/PO II I-2 MGrotenhuis/tg 11/t(, /87
~~I.-2 r?h'~/81
.:..,.*;;1**-*.
Mr. L. D.~Butterfiel~, Jr.
Commonwealth Edison Company cc:
Mr. Michael Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. J. Eenigenburg Plant Superintendent Dresden Nuclear Power Station Rural Route #1 Morris, Illinois 60450 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspection Office.
Dresden Station Rura 1 Route #1 Morris, Illinois 60450.
Chainnan Board of Supervisors of Grundy County*
Grundy County Courthouse Morris, Illinois 60450 Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Divisfon of. Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive, 5th Floor*
Springfield, Illinois* 62704 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Units 2 and 3.
Request for Additional Infonnation Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2&3 Item 2.2.1 Equipment Classification -
All Other Safety-Related Components Docket Nos. 50-237/249 We have reviewed the licensee's response to Item 2.2.1 of Generic Letter 83-28
.and find we need additional 1nfonnation from the licensee as indicated below in order to complete our review.
Item 2.2.1 - Program The licensee's response failed to conf1nn that the group consisting of all safety-related structures, systems, and components other than those required
- to trip the reactor are identified as such on plant documents such as drawings, procedures, system descriptions, test and maintenance instructions, operating procedures, and infonnation handling systems so that personnel who perfonn activities that afftct such safety-related components are aware that ~hey are working tin safety-related components and are guided by safety related procedures end constraints. The licensee needs to confinn in.his response the existence of such a program and either describe it or refer to descriptions of its parts in.
responses to the various sub-items which follow.
Item 2.2.1.1 Criteria The licensee's response is incomplete in that no description of the criteria for identif1cat1on of components as safety-related was presented nor were the procedures included so that it could be detennined that the criteria used met the requirements of this sub-item.
The licensee needs to either describe the criteria used to classify structures,.*
systems, and components as safety-related or confirm that the criteria contained*
in the corporate QA manual meets the requirements stated 1n the footnote to*
Item 2.2.1 1n Generic Letter 83-28 (NUREG-1000, Vol. 2).
Item 2.2.1.2 - Infonnat1or1 Handling System The licensee's response failed to describe how the listings were prepared,
- va lida*ted, *and maintained. The licensee *needs *to provide infonnat*ion *descr-ib1ng how the listings were prepared and validated as well as 1nfonnat1on describing
- procedures* used to*-enter new -items-, change the-class-ificat1on-of -1 isted items, prevent unauthorized changes, and assure the listing 1s available to users as* -
an unambiguous version.
f*
- Item 2.2.1.3 - Use of Equipment Classification Listing The licensee's response is incomplet~ because it does not clearly confinn that all activities which can aff~ct safety-related equipment are considered safety-related.or identify.clearly.those activities which are.not.
The licensee needs to either clearly confinn that all activities which affect
- safety-related equipment are considered safety-related or clearly identify those which are not and justify why they are not so classified.
Item 2.2.1.4 - Mandgement Controls The licensee's response is incomplete because it failed to describe the program by which management will determine that the equipment classification information handling 5ystem was prepared according to approved procedures, its contents properly validated, is being maintained current, and is being used to determine equipment cl~ssif ication as intended.
The licensee should describe the program of audit or other means by which*
management assures itself that the equipment classification infonnation handling system was properly prepared and is being properly implemented and used.