ML17059C092
| ML17059C092 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/19/1998 |
| From: | Vissing G NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17059C093 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9806240243 | |
| Download: ML17059C092 (8) | |
Text
7590-01-P UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION CENTRAL HUDSON GAS 8 ELECTRIC CORPORATION NINE MILEPOINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT2 ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANTIMPACT DOCKET NO. 50-410 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering the issuance of an Order approving, under 10 CFR 50.80, an application regarding a transfer of control of possessory rights held by Central Hudson Gas 8 Electric Corporation (Applicant) under the operating license for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2 (NMP2). The transfer would be to a holding company, not yet named, to be created over Applicant in accordance with a New York State Public Service Commission order, issued and effective February 19, 1998 (Case 96-E-0909), and related documents entitled "Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement" dated January 2, 1998, and "Modifications to Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement" dated February 26, 1998 (see Exhibits G-G2 in the application). Applicant is licensed by the Commission to own and possess a 9 percent interest,in NMP2, located in the town of Scriba, Oswego County, New York.
ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT Identification of the Pro osed Action:
The proposed action would consent to the transfer of control of the license to the extent effected by Applicant becoming a subsidiary of the newly formed holding company in connection with a proposed plan of restructuring.
Under the restructuring plan, the outstanding shares of Applicant's common stock are to be exchanged on a share-for-share basis for common stock of the holding company, such that the holding company willown all of the outstanding common r
stock of Applicant. In addiation, the holding company willown, directly or indirectly, the stock of any current non-utility subsidiaries of applicant except that Applicant willcontinue to own one 980624024G
'P806i'7 PDR ADOCK 05000410 P
I unregulated subsidiary.
Under this restructuring, Applicant willsell at auction its fossil-fueled electric generation facilities at its Danskammer Steam Generating Plant and its partial interest in the Roseton Electric Generation Plant (hereafter, collectively referred to as "Generation Assets" )
However, Applicant willcontinue to be an "electric utility"as defined in 10 CFR 50.2 engaged in the transmission, distribution, and generation of electricity at NMP2, combustion turbine facilities, hydroelectric facilities, and (until structurally separated or divested), the Generation Assets.
Applicant would retain its ownership interest in NMP2 and continue to be a licensee of NMP2.
No direct transfer of the operating, license or ownership interests in the station willresult from the proposed restructuring.
The transaction would not involve any change to either the management organization or technical personnel of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, which is responsible for operating and maintaining NMP2 and is not involved in the restructuring of Applicant. The proposed action is in accordance with Applicant's application dated April 8, 1998, as supplemented April22, 1998.
The Need for the Pro osed Action:
The proposed action is required to enable Applicant to restructure as described above.
Environmental Im acts of the Pro osed Action:
The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed corporate restructuring and concludes that it is an administrative action unrelated to plant operation; therefore, there will be no resulting physical or operational changes to NMP2. The corporate restructuring willnot affect the qualifications or organizational affiliation of the personnel who operate and maintain the facility, as NMPC willcontinue to be responsible for the maintenance and operation of NMP2 and is not involved in the restructuring of NYSEG.
The proposed action willnot increasi; the probability or consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in the types of any effluents that may be released offsite, and there is no significant increase in occupational or offsite radiation exposure.
Accordingly, the
Commission concludes that there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the restructuring would not affect nonradiofogical plant effluents and would have no other nonradiofogicai environmental impact.
Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Alternatives to the Pro osed Action:
Since the Commission has concluded there are no significant environmental impacts that would result from the proposed action, any alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be evaluated.
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered denial of the proposed action.
Denial of the application would result in no change in current environmental impacts.
The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources:
This action does not involve the use of any resources not previously considered in the Final Environmental Statements Related to the Operation of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2, (NUREG-1085) dated May 1985.
A encies and Persons Contacted:
In accordance with its stated policy, on June 19, 1998< the staff consulted with the New York State official, Mr. Jack Spath, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action.
The State official had no comments, FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANTIMPACT Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes that the proposed action willnot have a significant effect on the quality of the human'nvironment.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see Applicants's application dated April 8, as supplemented by letter dated April22, 1998, which are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW.,
Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at the Reference and Documents Department, Penfield Library, State University of New York, Oswego, New York 13126.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of June 1998.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION Guy S. Vissing, Acting Director Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
V t