ML17056A718
| ML17056A718 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/22/1990 |
| From: | Martin R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Burkhardt L NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| GL-88-20, TAC-74436, NUDOCS 9004020053 | |
| Download: ML17056A718 (6) | |
Text
March 22, 1990 Docket No. 50-220 Mr. Lawrence Burkhardt, III Executive Vice President, Nuclear Opertions Niagara Mohawk Power Corpor ation 301 Plainfield Road
- Syracuse, New York 13212 DISTRIBUTION c~
PDI-1 Rdg EJordan JFlack ACRS (10)
MBoyle J Linvil 1 e RCapra SVarga RMartin BBoger CVogan NRC
& Local PDRs
Dear Mr. Burkhardt:
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF 60-DAY RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 88-20, INDIVIDUALPLANT EXAMINATIONS (IPE)
Re:
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit No.
1 Generic Letter 88-20 requires, in part, that each operating reactor licensee and construction permit holder: (1) identify the approach and method selected for performing the IPE, (2) describe the method to be used, and (3) identify the schedule for performing the IPE and submitting the results to the NRC.
This information was to be submitted to the NRC within 60 days of issuance of Supplement 1 of the generic letter.
We have reviewed your letter dated November 3, 1989, submitted in response to the reporting requirements of the generic letter.
We conclude that your IPE approach, methodology and schedule are acceptable.
We anticipate that any possible additional analysis or reporting requirements, such as those from external events or from the Containment Performance Improvement Program, will not have any adverse effect on your schedule.
However, if your schedule should
- change, please notify the NRC of the proposed change and the reason for the change.
Should you have any questions concerning the requirements of the generic letter, please contact Mr. Michael L. Hoyle, NRR at (301) 492-1308 or Mr. John H. Flack, RES at (301) 492-3979.
S incere ly, Original signed by 9004020053 900322 PDR ADOCK 05000220 P
PDC cc:
See next page Robert E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation C'o.,
WW E CVogan DP,QE
- DI-1
<<0 <<WWW
~0 a
in/Bah
- RCapra 2/ ga
'- 9 zp/t>
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name:
REVIEW 60 DAY RESPONSE LTR pl l Ij
t IU 1
4 r
h
~p,P Racy 1p.0 Cy 00 rg 0 4~I gO
+>>*++
Docket No. 50-220 t
UNITED STATES t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 March 22, 1990 Mr. Lawrence Burkhardt, III Executive Vice President, Nuclear Opertions Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 301 Plainfield Road
- Syracuse, New York 13212
Dear Mr. Burkhardt:
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF 60-DAY RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 88-20$
INDIVIDUALPLANT EXAMINATIONS (IPE)
\\
Re:
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit No.
1 Generic Letter 88-20 requires, in part, that each operating reactor licensee and construction permit holder:
(1) identify the approach and method selected for performing the IPE, (2) describe the method to be used, and (3) identify the schedule for performing the IPE and submitting the results to the NRC.
This information was to be submitted to the NRC within 60 days of issuance of Supplement 1 of the generic letter.
We have reviewed your letter dated November 3, 1989, submitted in response to the reporting requirements of the generic letter.
We conclude that your IPE approach, methodology and schedule are acceptable.
We anticipate that any possible additional analysis or reporting requirements, such as those from external events or from the Containment Performance Improvement Program, will not have any adverse effect on your schedule.
However, if your schedule should
- change, please notify the NRC of the proposed change and the reason for the change.
Should you have any questions concerning the requirements of the generic letter, please contact Mr. Michael L. Boyle, NRR at (301) 492-1308 or Mr. John H. Flack, RES at (301) 492-3979.
S ineer e ly, cc:
See next page
/V/~
Rober E. Martin, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
0 47
Mr. L. Burkhardt III Niagara Mohawk Power Co ation
'i CC:
Nine Hi~Point Nuclear Station, Unit N~
Hr. Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esquire Conner 5 Wetterhahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania
- Avenue, N.
W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 Mr. Frank R. Church, Supervisor Town of Scriba R. D. 82
- Oswego, New York 13126 Mr. James L. Willis General Supt.-Nuclear Generation Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Post Office Box 32
- Lycoming, New York 13093 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 126
- Lycoming, New York 13093 Hr. Gary D. Wilson, Esquire Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West
- Syracuse, New York 13202 Regional Administrator, Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Ms. Donna Ross New York State Energy Office 2 Empire State Plaza 16th Floor
- Albany, New York 12223 Hr. Kim Dahlberg Unit 1 Station Superintendent Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Post Office Box 32
- Lycoming, New York 13093 Hr. Peter E. Francisco, Licensing Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 301 Plainfield Road
- Syracuse, New Yor k 13212 Charlie Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 Mr. Paul D. Eddy State of New York Department of Public Service Power Division, System Operations 3 Empire State Plaza
- Albany, New York 12223
>')) -i 1