ML17055E007

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-220/88-22 & 50-410/88-23 on 880620-24.Stated Significant Deficiencies Re Unit 1 Should Be Addressed Prior to Restart.Response Re Stated Deficiencies Requested within 30 Days of Receipt of Ltr
ML17055E007
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/08/1988
From: Johnston W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Mangan C
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
Shared Package
ML17055E008 List:
References
NUDOCS 8807200192
Download: ML17055E007 (8)


See also: IR 05000220/1988022

Text

I

DOCKET

05000220

05000410

SUBJECT:

Forwards Safety 'Insp Repts 50-22/88-22

& 50-410/88-23

on

880620-24.Two significant deficiencies

noted.

DISTRIBUTXON CODE

IE01D

COPIES

RECEIVED:LTR g ENCL Q

SIZE:

TITLE: General

(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vio ation Response

NOTES

AC CZIZRATZD

3)3K'MBUTJ'ON

DKMONSTRA,'EON

SYPXZM

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ESSION NBR:8807200192

DOC.DATE: 88/07/08

NOTARIZED'- NO

FACIL:50-220 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Niagara

Powe

50-410 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Niagara

Moha

AUTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

JOHNSTON,W.V.

Region 1, Ofc of the Director

RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

MANGAN,C.V.

Niagara

Mohawk Power Corp.

RECXPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD1-1

PD

HAUGHEY,M

INTERNAL: ACRS

DEDRO

NRR/DLPQ/PEB 11

NRR/DOEA DIR 11

NRR/DREP/RPB

10

NRR/PMAS/ILRB12

EXTERNAL: LPDR

NSIC

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

BENEDICT,R

AEOD

NRR MORISSEAU,D

NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10

NRR/DREP/EPB, 10

NRR/DRIS DIR 9A

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC 15-B-18

RES/DRPS

DEPY

NRC PDR

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

'1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

"h

D

8

9'

D

S

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

27

ENCL

27

Docket Nos. 50-220

50-410

Niagara

mohawk

Power Corporation

ATTN:

ftr. C. V. hiangan

Senior Yice President

301

P lainfie 1 d Road

Syracuse,

'New York

13212

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection

Nos. 50-220/88-22

and 50-410/88-23

This refers

to the

special

safety

inspection

conducted

by

an

NRC

Emergency

Operating

Procedure

Inspection

team

on

June

20-24,

1988, of activities pt the

Nine Mile Point Units

1

and 2,

and to the discussions

of our findings with you

and

members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

The

purposes

of the

inspection

were

to verify that

the

Emergency

Operating

Procedures

(EOPs)

are

technically correct,

that

the

EOPs

can

be physically

carried

out in the plant,

and that

the

EOPs

can

be

implemented

by the plant

staff.

The enclosed

inspection report identifies areas

examined during the inspection.

The areas

inspected for Unit

1 included

a comparison of the

EOPs with the

BWR

Emergency

Procedure

Guidelines

and the Plant Specific Technical

Guidelines,

a

review of the

EOPs

by control

room and plant walkdowns,

an evaluation of the

EOPs

on the plant referenced

simulator,

a human factors analysis of the

EOPs;

a

review of

EOP training for operators

and the on-going evaluation

program for

EOPs

including quality

Assurance

Program

evolvement,

and

an

evaluation

of

containment

venting

procedures.

The

area

inspected

on

Unit

2

included

an

evaluation of an operating

crew on the plant-referenced

simulator.

The

items

identified

during

the

course

of this

inspection

are

not

being

char acterized

as violations of

NRC requirements

at this time.

However,

two

significant deficiencies

were identified regarding Unit

1 during the inspection

that warrant your attention

and

should

be addressed

prior to Unit

1 restat t.

The

inspection

report

also

identifies

unresolved

items

for

the

specific

functional areas.

The first significant deficiency was identified concerning the Unit

1 operating

crew performance

during the evaluation of the

EOPs

on the simulator.

The

NRC

determined that the Unit

1 operating

crew could not properly implement the

EOPs

and that

the

crew

lacked

an

understanding

of the

bases

for the

EOPs.

This

deficiency appears

to be the result of inadequate

management

attention to the

quality of training provided to the licensed operators

at Unit l.

OFFICIAL RECORD

COPY

8807200i92

S8070S

PDR

ADOCK 05000220

9

PDC

The second significant deficiency identified was the lack of assurance

that the

EOPs

can

be

implemented

in the plant.

This defi'ciency is based

on the lack of

adequate

preplanning

on the

equipment,

tools,

jumpers

and material

needed

to

perform the specific

EOP tasks;

lack of validation of out of control

room

EOP

actions;

lack of verification of plant hardware specifically against

the

EOPs;

lack of training on out of control room

EOP actions;

lack of adequate

administrative

controls to assure

that

changes

made

to procedures

referenced

in the

EOPs

do

not

impact

the

EOPs;

and,

lack of quality assurance

involvement

in the

EOP

program.

We request that you respond,

in writing, within thirty days of receipt of this

letter identifying actions

taken

or planned

to address

these

deficiencies

as

well as to the specific unresolved

items identified in the enclosed

inspection

report.

In accordance

with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,

a copy of this

letter

and

the

enclosed

inspection

report will be

placed

in the

NRC Public

Document

Room.

The

response

requested

by this

letter

is

not

subject

to

the

clearance

procedures

of the Office of management

and Budget

as required

by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980,

Pub.

Law No.96-511.

Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated.

Sincerely,

ORIGlHAL SIG[<FD QY

WILUAM V. >OH;~S;Og

William V. Johnston,

Acting Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure:

Inspection

Report Nos. 50-220/88-22

and 50-410/88-23

OFFICIAL RECORD

COPY

cc w/encl:

J.

A. Perry,

Vice President,

guality Assurance

T. Perkins,

Vice President,

Nuclear Generation

W. Hansen,

Manager Corporate guality Assurance

T. Roman, Unit

1 Station Superintendent

R. Randall,

Unit

1 Superintendent,

Operations

R. B. Abbott, Unit 2 Station Superintendent

C.

Beckham,

Manager Nuclear guality Assurance

Operations

W. Drews, Technical Superintendent

J.

Willis, General Station Superintendent

C. Terry, Vice President

Nuclear Engineering

and Licensing

Troy B. Conner, Jr. Esquire

John

W. Keib, Esquire

Director,

Power Division

State of New York, Department of Public Service

State of New York, Department of Law

Public Document

Room

(PDR)

Local Public Document

Room

(LPDR) .

Nuclear Safety Information Center

(NSIC)

NRC Resident

Inspector

State of New York

bcc w/encl:

Region I Docket

Room (with concurrences)

Management Assistant,

DRMA (w/o encl)

DRP Section Chief

Region I SLO

PAO (2)

Robert J. Bores,

DRSS

D. Florek,

DRS

C. Sisco,

DRS

R. Evans,

DRS

W. Hansen,

COMEX

G. Lapinsky,

NRR

A. Sutthoff,

NRR

W. Regan,

NRR

C. Julian, RII

G. Wright, RIII

R.

Gag liardoRIV

or

7/'7 /88

RI:DRS,

Lang

7/'( /88

GGCo

7

/88

yVQ

Johnston

7/8'/88

OFFICIAL RECORD

COPY

0