ML17055D892
| ML17055D892 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/25/1988 |
| From: | Haughey M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mangan C NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| TAC-67174, NUDOCS 8806020223 | |
| Download: ML17055D892 (52) | |
Text
Pay 25, 1988 Docket No. 50-410 Mr. Charles V. Mangan Senior Vice President Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 301 Plainfield Road
SVarga BBoger CYogan MHaughey JJohnson OGC-WF EJordan JPartlow ACRS(10)
Dear Mr. Mangan:
SUBJECT:
WITHDRAWAL OF THE REQUEST FOR A SCHEDULAR EXEMPTION FROM 10 CFR 50.54 (TAC 67174)
By letter dated January 21, 1988, Niagara Mohawk requested a schedular exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(c)(3)(i) regarding the requirements for an inerted containment.
This exemption was requested to allow additional time to complete the preoperational testing of the inerting system while power ascension testing was being performed.
On May 12, 1988 you submitted a request to withdraw the exemption request.
The request for withdrawal stated that the 100% rated thermal power trip test has been completed and the Nine Mile Point Unit 2 containment is now inerted.
This letter acknowledges the withdrawal of your request for a schedular exemption from 10 CFR 50.44(c)(3)(i).
Sincerely, cc:
See next page PDI-1 CVogan 5/4%/88 MHau ey:dig 5/g 88 flgjgfv~""'-'"
Mary F. Haughey, Project Manager Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects, I/II PDI-1 RCapra 5/QS/88 8806020223 880525 PDR ADOCN, 05000410 P
~ g e
t P
l
Mr. C. V. Mangan Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 CC:
Mr. Troy B. Conner, Jr.,
Esq.
Conner 5 Wetterhahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania
- Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20006 Mr. Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University College of Law E. I. White Hall Campus
- Syracuse, New Yor k 12223 Mr. Don Hill Niagara Mohawk Powe~ Corporation Suite 550 4520 East West Highway
- Bethesda, MD 20814 Resident Inspector Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station P. 0.
Box 99
- Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. Gary D. Wilson, Esquire Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West
- Syracuse, New York 13202 Mr. Peter E. Francisco, Licensing Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 301 Plainfield Road
- Syracuse, New York 13212 Ms.
Donna Ross New York State Energy Office 2 Empire State Plaza 16th Floor Albany, New York 12223 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. Paul D. Eddy New York State Public Serice Commission Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station-Unit 2 P.O.
Box 63
- Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. Richard M. Kessel Chair and Executive Director State Consumer Protection Board 99 Washington Avenue
- Albany, New York 12210 Mr. Richard Abbott, Unit 2 Station Superintendent Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation P. 0.
Box 32
- Lycoming, NY 13093 Mr. James L. Willis, General Supt.,
Nuclear Generation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation P. 0.
Box 32
- Lycoming, NY 13093
II
~ ~
~ Nay 24, 1988 The staff requested to be informed of the difference between the restart test procedure (and results) and a preoperational test procedure (and results).
Concernina the difference between BFN and S
N Refer to Viewara h 9, Com arison to Se uo ah" BFN is an older plant than SgN.
Whereas SgN was able to determine current configuration from documents on file, BFN, an older plant, will require more updating of configuration.
.As a genera)
- rule, BFN will not go back to the original startup test specs and results but will perform tests based on current configuration.
Refer to Yiew ra h 4, "Fundamentals of Restart Test Pro ram" BFN explained what graded approach to testing means.
They essentially reviewed their breakdown in terms of categories of Restart Test Program.
Refer to Viewara h 5, "Restart Test Pro ram Additional Testin Planned" The discussion indicated the staff is concerned that power ascension testing be a part of RTP.
TYA emphasized
- that, power ascension testing is a part of RTP.
TVA further stated that variations in restart Power Ascension Testing from inital startup wi 11 not be explained in the test procedure.
The staff requested a paragraph on depth and breadth of the items on Viewgraph 5.
Refer to View ra h 6, "Restart Test Pro ram Administration and Control" Thiq viewgraph sums up TYA's response to staff concerns about the use of original startup test data, maintenance test data and surveillance test data.
The staff requested that TYA provide the explanation of the differences between each restart test specification and the corresponding specification from initial startup test.
- Further, where there are variances, justification shou1d be given.
TYA responde4with the following commitment.
Danny Walker will provide variance between Restart Test procedures and initial startup test procedures; Don Hosmer will-document credit taken for past performance.
Comnitments by TVA to respond with additional information are summarized at the end of this section.
Refer to Viewara h 8, "Interface with Other Site Programs" TYA explained the significant interfaces between RTP and other site programs.
The most significant in the opinions of the staff was Design Baseline and Verification Program (DBYP) because of the need for establishing and maintaining current configuration.
May 24, 1988 Refer. to Viewara h 10, "BFN RTP Organization Chart" See charts included as Enclosure 4.
The names and slot assignments checked out with the current approved BFN oraanization chart dated February 24, 1988.
There are two consultants Jerry Martin, Assistant Plant Manager and John
The remainder of the peop1e at the RTP meetings are TYA employees.
Refer to Yiew ra h ll This is a quantative tally of completion status of the various component parts of RTP.
The viewgraph is self-explanatory - e.g.,
8 of 43 tests had been conducted at the time of the meeting.
At the close of the first session, TYA provided some information on..DG testing to be covered during the second session dealing with details of DG testing.
Summary of Diesel Generating Test Calibration Test Load Shedding and Sequencing Tests Load Acceptance Tests Loss of Offsite Power/Loss of Coolant Accident Tests (4 tests) 24 Hour fuel consumption runs Loss of offsite power during power ascention at 25% power This first session on RTP closed with Angelo Marinos emphasizing that during the detailed Diesel Generator Test discussions, he desired one on one talks with the people who are running the test.
TVA responded that Milliam H. Nelson, the engineer running the Diesel Generator tests would be at the second session.
In conclusion, from the NRC's point of view this meetino was helpful in providing NRC with details of the restart test program.
Development of baseline test -requirements, difference between restart test procedures and "full fledge" pre-operational
- tests, and details of acceptance testing were discussed.
In order to clarify and address NRC concerns resulting from the above discussions, TYA has agreed to provide NRC with the followino additional information:
May 24, 1988 Provide documentation and justification on differences between pre-operational test requirements and RTP baseline test requirements.
(In TYA's parlance, "Preoperational Test" is "Fully Integrated Functional System Test" ).
Provide list of previous run test data (SI's, EMI's etc.) which wi 11 be used by restart test program in lieu of actual testing.
Provide general description of testing to be accomplished during integrated cold functional testing LOP/LOCA and remote shutdown drill.
A paragraph on the depth and breadth if the items on Yiewgraph 5.
Subsequent to the meeting TVA stated they would transmit clarifying information requested by the staff by Nay 20, 1988.
SECTION 2
DIESEL GENERATOR TESTING DETAIL The attendance roster is Enclosure 2.
TYA gave a brief summary of the previous session on the RTP program in general.
The following are significant points of the briefing.
Diesel Generator testing is to be performed in sufficient depth to minimize as much as possible the need for calculations.
The load sequence test is similar to SgN, however, there will be unique crosstie conditions in the setup at Browns Ferry (BFN) to allow for full load testing of the three main loads.
TVA will aTso apply the.constant KVA load on the DG prior to loading on the sequence testing as required.
The random loads block will also be applied during the load sequence test.
GE will be conducting a transient load analysis to simulate generator response.
BFN has 2600 Xw machines vs 4000 kw at SAN.
TVA indicatef that they plan to take credit for the actual load power factor as done at SgN.
TYA stated they would attempt to maintain constant KVA loads as closely as possible.
TVA stated that limited load testing has been done at BFN.
BFN stated they were currently working on 1B DG to replace a turbocharger.
TYA stated their objective is to benchmark from DG IA and IB.
The staff indicated that if TVA takes credit for a preoperational
- test, the configuration of that portion tested must be the same at restart as it was for the preoperational test.
Subsequent to the meeting, TVA provided the following explanation of the difference between preoperational testing and restart testing as perceived at TVA:
Prep erational Testin of a system is a sequential
- exercise, where the testing is continued through the interfaces with other systems;
- whereas, Restart Testin involves functional testing of RTP systems which are tested sn epen ent y of interfacing systems.
However, interface signals are verified both as to transmission of the signal and receipt of the signal by the interfacing system.
In response to a question concerning loading intervals of the Diesel Generators.
TVA stated they would run for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> as follows:
2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 22 hours 82950m 50KW 82850150KW TVA stated that the BFN Technical Specification (TS) call for testing at 3/4 of continuous rating.
TVA was informed by the staff that if credit is taken for rating not in the TS's then the TS's must be modified to include the rating.*
TVA stated they are testing to the manufacturer's rating:
Tech.
Specs are another matter.
The staff questioned TVA's ability to justify voltage drops down to 45% of nominal during transient loading of the diesel generators.
TVA stated they are looking into the MCC contactor performance at those low voltages.
The staff asked whether General Electric (GE) is going to take BFN's test data and run it as a comparison to the GE Code?
TVA responded that their objective is to establish a baseline and hopefully obtain a 1: 1 relationship with the GE Code.
There will be possible T.S.
change as to DG ratings and load response.
- BFN was asked to setup a teleconference with NRC PM to layout a schedule for any Tech.
Spec.
changes so they can be handled smoothly and in a timely manner.
Enclosures:
l.
April 26, 1988 a.m. Attendance List 2.
April 26, 1988 p.m. Attendance List 3.
Restart Test Program 4.
Organization Chart David H. Moran, Project Manager TVA Projects Division Office of Special Projects Distribution
~kFi NR PD Local PDR Those on Attached List cc w/enclosures:
S. Ebneter S. Richardson Projects Staff OSP:TVA PM DMora 5/Pf/
/BC 0:Jg~igl A~ar'nos G
F
e.
~ +
II t
II Pl ci l
May 24 1988 The staff indicated that if TYA, takes credit for a preoperational
- test, the configuration of that portion tested must be the same at restart as it was for the preoperational test.
Subsequent to the meeting, TYA provided the following explanation of the difference between preoperational testing and restart testing as perceived at TVA:
Prep erational Testing of a system is a sequential
- exercise, where the testing is continued t roug the interfaces with other systems;
- whereas, Restart Testino involves functional testing of RTP systems which are tested
'~gf f
f fg.g,f f
both as to transmission of the signal and receipt of the signal by the interfacing system.
In response to a question concerning loading intervals of the Diesel Generators.
TYA stated they would run for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> as follows:
2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 22 hours 92950t50KM 82850+50KW TVA stated that the BFN Technical Specification (TS) call for testing at 3/4 of continuous rating.
TYA was informed by the staff that if credit is taken for rating not in the TS's then the TS's must be modified to include the rating.*
TYA stated they are testing to the manufacturer's rating:
Tech.
Specs are another matter.
The staff questioned TVA's ability to justify voltage drops down to 455 of nominal during transient loading of the diesel generators.
TYA stated they are looking into the MCC contactor performance at those low voltages.
The staff asked whether General Electric (GE) is going to take BFN's test data and run it as a comparison to the GE Code?
TVA responded that their objective is to establish a baseline and hopefully obtain a I:I relationship with the GE Code.
There will be possible T.S.
change as to DG ratings and load response.
- BFN was asked to setup a teleconference with NRC PM to layout a schedule for any Tech.
Spec.
changes so they can be handled smoothly and in a timely manner.
Enclosures:
l.
April 26, 1988 a.m. Attendance List 2.
April 26, 1988 p.m. Attendance List 3.
Restart Test Program 4.
Organization Chart David H. Mor n, Pr ct Manage TVA Projects Division Office of Special Projects cc w/enclosures:
See next page
~ 0
Browns Ferry Nuclear
- Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3
cc General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive Ell B33 Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Mr. R. L. Gridley Tennessee Valley Authority 5N 157B Lookout Place Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801 Mr. H. P.
Pomrehn Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant P.O.
Box 2000
- Decatur, Alabama 35602 Mr. M. J.
May Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant P.O.
Box 2000
. Decatur, Alabama 35602 Mr. D. L. Williams Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive W10 B85 Knoxville, Tennessee 37902
- Chairman, Limestone County Commission P.O.
Box 188
- Athens, Alabama 35611 Claude Earl Fox, M.D.
State Health Officer State Department of Public Health State Office -Building Montgomery, Alabama 36130 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Resident Inspector/Browns Ferry NP U.S. Nuclear Regulatory,Coomission Route 12, Box 637
- Athens, Alabama 35611 Mr. Richard King c/o U.S.
GAO 1111 North Shore Drive Suite 225, Box 194 Knoxville, Tennessee 37919 Dr. Henry Myers, Science Advisor.
Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs U.S.
House of Representatives Washington, D.C.
20515 Mr. S. A. White Manager of Nuclear Power Tennessee Valley Authority 6N 38A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801
DISTRIBUTION FOR MEETING
SUMMARY
DATED:
May 24,
]gBB Facilitv:
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 and 3*
Docket=F-i-1 e NRC PDR Local PDR Projects Reading S.
Ebneter J. Partlow J. Axelrad S. Richardson S. Black B.
D. Liaw G. Gears D. Moran J. Kelly M. Sinms OGC J.
Rutberg F. Miraglia E. Jordan M. C.
Bender E. F. Christnot S. Traiforos G. L. Paulk H. Garg A. Marinos ACRS (10)
Hon.
M. Lloyd Hon. J.
Cooper Hon.
D. Sundquiest Hon. A. Gore Dr. Henry Myers Mr. R. King, GAO P.
Gwynn J.
Scarborough G. Marcus C. Miller T. Elsasser C. Ader TVA-Rockville-BFN Rdg. File=.=
~
- cc:
Licensee/App)icant 8 Service List
~.
J t
l t
I
~~
a l-h.fN I i I
S kE'D
'I I
I DvCp,'
I t
t
(-=i I
1 I
~
I D-.
r RK 0 Q.
C..
N j T.lNGTES I
R--
T
\\
II II I
I II t
I I
~
I I
I 1
I I
Ii I
I I
I I
t I
I I
(
~
I I
I I
I I
l i
l t
I t
~
l i
I t
t
Enclosure I RTP MEETING BFN ROSTER David H. Moran Joe Savage Hukam Garg Angelo Marinos William C. Bender E.
F. Christnot Spyros Traiforos Don Hosmer David Skridulis John Lee Sparks M. May Jerry D. Martin G. L. Paulk P. J.
Polk J.
G. Walker NRC/OSP TVA/BFN/Licensing NRC/OSP NRC/ODP NRC - Resident Inspector NRC - Resident Inspector NRC - Consultant TVA/BFN TVA/BFN TVA/BFN TVA/Licensing TVA NRC/Resident TVA-Rockvi lie TVA
Enclosur RTP MEETING BROWS FERRY DIESEL GENERATOR TESTING ATTENOANCE ROOSTER Oavid H. Moran John C..Hashagan William H. Nelson, Jr.
Jim Hutson Jeffrey M. Ruddy Don Hosmer William C. Thomison Hukam Garg Angelo Marinos B. C. Mor~is E. F. Christnot Masoud Bajestani Ed Freeman John Lee Sparks OSP TVA/RTP TVA/ONE TVA/ONE TVA/ONE TVA TVA OSP OSP BFN RII TVA - Systems Engineer TVA - Systems Engineer TVA - Systems Engineer
B R 0 l4 N S F E R
R Y
R E S
T A R T T E S T P
R 0 G
R A l1
+
PH ILOSOPHY FUNDAMENTALS OF PROGRAN ADNINISTRATION AND CONTROL
+
INTERFACE WITH OTHER BRONNS FERRY PROGRANS
+
COMPARISON TO SEGUOYAH SUNNARY
RESTART TEST PROGRAM PHILOSOPHY
+
DUE TO PPOLONGED OUTAGE AND EXTENSIVE MODIFICAT IONS ALL SYSTEMS NEED TO BE REV I EWED FOP.
TESTiNG REQUIREMENTS TO VERIFY S4FE AND RELIABLE OPERATION OF THE PLANT
+
RTP IS IN ADDITION TO THE POST MOD TEST PROGRAM 4ND THE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM
+ RESTART TEST REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DOCUMENTED
.SYSTEM TEST SPECIFICATIONS SYSTEM TEST INSTRUCTIONS A
GRADED 4PPROACH TO TESTING ON VARIOUS SYSTEMS WILL BE USED
+ TESTS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY APPROVED INSTRUCTIONS I'
TEQ3'-PROGRAM WILL BE CONTROLLED BY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
+ TEST RESULTS WILL BE REVIEWED 4ND APPROVED PRIOR TO APPROPRIATE MILESTONES
+
A JOINT TEST GROUP
<JTG)
WILL SERVE AS A DEDICATED REVIEW GROUP FOR THE RESTART TEST PROGRAM
JOINT TEST GROUP PORC SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP CHAIRMAN UNIT Z SUPERINTENDENT JTG MEMBERS OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SUPPORT MODIFICATIONS MAINTENANCE RESTART TEST PROGRAM NSSS VENDOR REPRESENTATIVE CHARTER REV.IEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF SYSTEM TEST SPECIFICATIONS AND REVISIONS REVIEW AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESTART TEST PROGRAM TEST INSTBUCT I ONS y REVISIONS AND TEST RESULTS APPROVAL TO START TEST CONDUCT
FUNDAMENTALS OF RESTART TEST PROGRAM
+
GRADED APPROACH TO TESTING
+
CATAGOR I ES OF SYSTEM TESTING GROUP 1:
CRITICAL TO SAFE OPERATION OF PLANT GROUP 2:
SUPPORT TO PLANT OPERATION GROUP 3.
NOT DIRECTLY SUPPORTING OPERATION OR IMPORTANT TO SAFETY
+ CRITERIA USED TO DETERMINE LEVEL OF TESTING:
DESIGN BASELINE AND VERIFICATION PROGRAM (DB VP)
TEST REQUIREMENTS IMPORTANCE TO SAFETY OF PLANT EXTENT OF MODIFICATIONS OPERATIONAL AND 'MAINTENANCE HISTORY OPERATOR TRAINING
+
SYSTEM GROUP AND TESTING APPROVED BY JTG GROUP 1:
MAJORITY OF SYSTEM TESTING SPECIFIED BY DBhVP PROGRAM GROUP':
FEW OR NO TEST REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED BY DBhVPg MAJORITY OF SYSTEM ADDRESSED BY RTP REVIEW FOR TESTING REQUIREMENTS GROUP 3
LITTLE OR NO TESTING)
REVIEW OF SYSTEM FOR PROPER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ONLY.
RESTART TEST PROGRAN ADDITIONAL TESTING PLANNED INTEGRATED TESTING PRIOR TO PLANT STARTUP LOSS QF QFFSITE POWER/LOSS OF COOLANT TEST INTEGRATED COLD FUNCTIONAL TESTING'ENOTE SHUTDOWN DRILL POWER ASCENSION TESTING CONTINUED SYSTEM OPERATIONAL TESTS CONTROL SYSTEM TUNEUP TESTS TRANSIENTS y TRIPS p SCRAPS
<1
RESTART TEST PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND CONTROL
+
OVERALL ADMINISTRATION 4ND CONDUCT OF RESTART TEST PROGR4M WILL BE DEFINED BY APPROVED PROCEDURES
+
SYSTEM TEST SPECIFICATION TEST REQUIREMENTS FROM DESIGN BASELINE VERIFIC4TION PROGRAM TEST REQUIREMENTS FROM REVIEW OF OPER4TION AND MAINTENANCE HISTORY'ODIFICATIONS'ENDOR INFORMATION
+ EXISTING SITE TEST PROCEDURES CAN BE USED SURVEILLANCE INSTRUCTIONS y POST MOD TESTS y
MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS y ETC.
IF TEST WAS PREVIOUSLY RUN y RTP REVIEW AND ZTG APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR ACCEPTANCE.
+ SYSTEM,TEST INSTRUCTIONS SPECIFIES EXISTING SITE TEST PROCEDURES TO BE USED TO MEET SOME TEST REQUIREMENTS ADDITIONAL TEST INSTRUCTIONS TO MEET REMAINING TEST REQUIREMENTS
RESTART TEST PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND CONTROL
< CONT INUED )
+
CONDUCT OF TESTING QUALIFIED TEST ENGINEERS TO RUNg WITNESS'R REVIEW. TESTS CONTROL OF TESTING..
TEST LOSSES REVERIFICATION OF PREREQUIS ITES p DOCUMENTATION OF EXCEPTIONS ETC.
QC TO W ITNFSS PORTIONS OF TESTS AS APPROPRIATE JOINT TEST GROUP TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL DOCUMENTATION MEMBERSHIP FROM VARIOUS S I TE ORGANI:ATIONS SERVES AS PORC SUB-COMMITTEE REVIEWS AND APPROVES TEST RESULTS
INTERFACE WITH OTHER SITE PROGRAMS DESIGN BASFLINE AND VERIFICATION (
~~ VP
)
PROGRAM PROVIDES SYSTEM TEST REQUIREMENTS TO RESTART TEST PPQGRAM TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS PROVIDED TO DB 5 VP PROGRAM MEMBER OF JOINT TEST GROUP
+
OPERA ICNAL READINESS PROGRAM RESTART TEST PROGRAM WILL ADDRESSED IN THE OR
+
POST MODIFICATION TEST SECTION SERVE AS TEST DIRECTOR WHERE NECESSARY
+
SYSTEM ENGINEERS SECTION PROVIDES REVIEW OF DB ~ VP TEST REQUIREMENTS ASSIST WHEREVER POSSIBLE QN RESTART TEST PROGRAM AS TEST DIRECTORS
-MEMBER QF O'OINT TEST GROUP
+
OPERAT IQNS ORGANIZATION CONTROL GF SYSTEM DURING PERIOD OF TESTING MEMBER OF JOINT TEST GROUP
C Q
M P A R I S 0 N
T O
S E
Q U 0 Y A H SEQUOYAH IS POST TMI p BRQWNS FERRY IS PRE-TMI VOLUME - AND RETRIEVABILITYQF EARLY TEST AND MODIFICATION DATA AT SQN MADE IT POSSIBLE TO EVALUATE ONLY CHANGES MADE SINCE QL.
AT BFNe RESTART TEST IS PROVING SAFE SHUTDOWN FUNCTIONS RATHER THAN EVALUATING EFFECT OF MODS ON THESE FUNCTIONS.
BFN USES SI 'S WHERE POSSIBLE.,
BUT NOT TO THE EXTENT THAT SEQUOYAH DID.
REPORTING LEVELS ARE DIFFERENT ON PAPERp BUT ARE FUNCTIONALLY SIMILAR.
SUN REPORTS TO SITE DIRECTOR BFN REPORTS TO PLANT MANAGER JTB"AT BFN IS A PORC SUBCOMMITTEE RATHER THAN A SEPARATE BODY REPORTING TO SITE DIRECTOR AS AT SQN.
r
BROGANS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT RESTART 'I'ES'I'ROGRAM ORGANIZATIONCHART SITE DIRECI'OR H.P. POMREHN PLANT MANAGER J.G. WALKER POWER ASCENSION PROGRAM
<<G. PRATI'GE)
RESTART TEST PROGRAM MANAGER D.E. HOSMER SECRETARY LINDASANDY PROCEDURE REVIEWGRP.
P. PATEL (SWEC)
D. WEBSTER (GE)
S. DUGAN (SWEC)
ASST. RESTART TEST FROG.
MANAGER PLANNING&SCHEDULING R. GOMEZ (SWEC)
D. TIBBS (CE)
G.T. McCHRISTIAN (A)
~ LEADENGINEER
'SSS TEST GROUP s D. JONES (SWEC)
P. BEMBNISTER (SWEC)
J. GRANT (SWEC)
F. KOZACKA(SWEC)
D. SCHULER (SWEC)
S. AITKEN(SWEC)
R. JONES (GE)
L. LONG (SWEC)
G. LUMPKIN(SWEC ELECT. TEST GROUP J. HASHAGEN (NEC)
P. McDONOUGH (SWEC)
R. JACKSON (SWEC)
C. BOGOLIN (CE)
BOP TESI'ROUP i K. PINSON (CE)
K. DUNHAM(SWEC)
S. BEAVER (SWEC)
H. KOCH (SWEC)
M. MANNING(SWEC)
K. MALONEY(SWEC)
K. O'SHAUGHNESSY (SWEC)
RESTART TEST PROGRAM 41 / 41 TEST SPECIFICATIONS APPROVED 43 TEST PROCEDURES APPROVED 08 r 43 TESTS CONDUCTED 14 / 43 TESTS STARTED / IN PROGRESS 02 / 43 JOINT TEST GROUP APPROVAL OF TEST RESULTS OBTAINED 08 /.4S SYSTEM CHECKLIST COMPLETE
~ TOIOOQ RESTART TEST PROGRAM PERFORMANCE SciiEDULE JAMJART SESRWNT IIAACH wa>>>>NN 4>>
~4 NN APRIL 11 AT IOOO AUGVSI SEPIElrOER 1<OTEreEA OE CE 16EA
,I')I',
Ir Ig WI I
~4<<
~i'~-
--.-'s<a<IT
~NN IVI V lsa I NI
~ IN ar<>>
Nll laaa<<aa ia
- l. Isss NN aw
<4OIN>>
W III>>I ~ IN<<
~
~
Iae
~4 NV Iel N
g:A~i'.wa 4
~
~<<v lr<>>s 4
NV
~ Nr
~
al W~WW w
~ Vs+4 'II
~I sl-I rera I all <1 el I~
~N w >>IN JiRii N ~
NWN e<W
~~ hL~N "LCI p
+.IN+ItWLIM AiRiF we 1
~4 Iaar< w I
~
NIV
~ N
~
1141 lp'4 11k
~al ll INl a.'.ll
~141 lars sr<4 4 4 IN<<<Ir <4 W Ns NI w v w N 4 <Ne I>>rr<r s<<a
~ AV4 SNN sr<I <<<I
<<osl NK<NIOI ll
~ & <V ~
I~
NIW4
~
4 NV 4 W W IV W NV
~VN 4 N
~4 NV
~ ~~V Ns W NV IV
~>> area
~
~ ~ NN t~r>> I I
sill 0 P h>> <>s p s>><<<I ll
~
NI
~ N ~I IW<e Na w Naa Nraw
~ IN<re~ INN
~ >>I
~ NN
~ N>><<a< ~ atl'll
~ IVKININ<N NN ~ <I
~NNI<VINN
~ 1[we N<Tgaa qaNI N>>SW << Is>>NN O'LL1% 1a sL<
I:
~
~ 4 N
~
Ne N. WI
~
~
~
I
~
L /
f
~
1,
~
I
'I, I 'g
~ ~
<)q
)
.R )
~ )l
'1
~
li1
) 'I) s a.
I 1,
~,p)i
'I
.I L;/9 i Ljar,g'",j:
1',
Is
~
~ (
~
Enclosure 4
SITE DIRECTOR SITE
. DIRECTOR DEPUTY SITE DIRECTOR SI1
~
'IRECTOR I>h
)
I 1 ~
5 I A:-
I dc~A~(hlp
) I~<- A, key
- ASSIN'AHf TO SITE
,:, DIRECTOR ASSISTANT TO SITE DIRECTOR
$ hlE Ppy J).: y.7
-M6Q I
1
(
i )JgP:)qy~p~
d,dI @Or/1q'-~q/>
'G111"-" 'Rt L1)',, l" ll '. '
p, ~i,': I (pc.
1 1'.
Jr.pr i7~oay ~
J)w Hvl~ n -yy<.
f.Jw I./
Y 4/Pc lc c
+$
ilAt&AEA PUIOg SCIIED.
ESTER 4 flIIAHCPL SHMCES
/ '
r(1
~
~
I MANAO lAANAOER SECURITY Jo4 u))'~
PLANT g MANAoER cJay r aRV iw-Af MANAOER PROJECT OPERATlONS MANAGER OP ERATIONAL READINESS RADIOLOCICAL ASSESSOR 2
2>ad yiOS~eZ Ju~/ ~g~/ f i g;.(
ig/1;,., gy.
@~4m 7 7)'o+
?ecA d~~
j
~l Q )e 1 //t)rtd61 )v I u, I
I
I
Agl,oH ~ 4WI44l gJ ~,to,yak I lt
~ '
I i4 &1 C 8 IT R I TOR P LANT MANAGER PLANT MANAOER dJl m ASSISTANT lg MAHAOER (OUTAOES)-'SSISTANT'O PLANT MANAGER PROJKOT MANAGER (INSTRUCTION REVlKW)
ASSISTANT TQ PLANT MANAGER i
~
OPERAT1ONS Su< ERINTEHOENT TKOHHIOAL SUPPORT
. SUPERINTENDENT sea er r>~!+<
MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT 5m RAQIOLOOICAL COMTROL SUPERINTENDENT 5ysw:s Ense 04>R',
Jul~ n g8D7~ 7eDr /ddt.
3o~ Hm~~Z
,I
(/e /r. dred.+.'
~+