ML17055D418
| ML17055D418 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/25/1987 |
| From: | Haughey M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mangan C NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| TAC-66071, NUDOCS 8712040405 | |
| Download: ML17055D418 (6) | |
Text
\\
Docket No. 50-410 Mr. Charles V. Mangan Senior Vice President Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 301 Plainfield Road
- Syracuse, New York 13212
Dear Mr. Mangan:
November 25, 1987 DISTRIBUTION NRCPDR Local PDR PDI-1 Rdg.
SVarga BBoger CVogan ACRS 10 EJor dan JPartlow OGC JJohnson,RI FLitton
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE FIRST 10-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR NINE MILE POINT, UNIT 2 (TAC 66071)
The NRC staff and its consultant (EGSG, Idaho) have evaluated your First Ten-Year Interval Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program for Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 submitted July 30, 1987.
Before we can complete our review, additional information as identified in the enclosure is required.
In order to complete our review in a timely manner we request you provide the response to the enclosed request within 60 days of receipt of this letter.
This portion of our review of your ISI Program does not include Section III, "Pump and Valve Inservice Testing (IWP, IWV)," submitted with your July 30, 1987 letter or the changes to your Preservice Inspection Program submitted July 29, 1987.
Sincerely,
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page Mary F. Haughey, Project, Manager Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects, I/II PDI-1
~Q CVogan 11/ g/87 MHaughey 11/
87 PDI-1 RCapra ll/gg/87 8712040405 87i 125 l7 PDR ADQCK 05000410,'. 'DR
)
t ~
n<< y<<VW W>>l
{,hg
). H>>P r
'IP wl )
Vt w>> E>>
w vh,),1('wrjf )
I
~,lv w.t1" 1
P ll
- VlI, I,'Iwf IV V
t VWV>>(
W 'Vt W
W 1 'l vh'CIi
~ twtwh" 1 / rg w<
r )
w v r );W 'P'>>;,
1'),3 lW>>()"Iw
'I V. >> r th>>>>.)
rW II/
rw
-'f,'W r<<
I 1
W wtt>>
v>> 1'. "
vH I'tl,l 1 1 1:
I lr v
ww vf'k Iw Plhw
- 1. 1" I'
f
~ w ii
~ r 1
p I
)p tfrl l.
Pvhw'I'1
- w1
)1 '.
w 1hw W
W" HW H
I'r El'it'1'h t'
JWI I r Wlt 'l V,I <<.>>
rr w
r W
'w,h)'
f VV VIP W ghfwf w
1 I<<1 lg VV,
'VW)
- V V Hv C.HP'Oiii' v
r'1 Ir ww')KP
)'1;,')"
V
),,
.,)i fir'1 I
q V
VI)WV Vh'P>> t r
1 Hlr hh Q'I g
1 P
"~
Mr. C.
V. Mangan Niaga~a Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 cc Mr. Troy B. Conner, Jr.,
Esq.
Conner 8 Wetter hahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania
- Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20006 Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University College of Law E. I. White Hall Campus
- Syracuse, New York 12223 Ezra I. Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 Wor ld Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Resident Inspector Nine Mile Point Nuclear Powe~ Station P. 0.
Box 99
- Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. John W. Keib, Esq.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West
- Syracuse, New York 13202 Peter E. Francisco, Licensing Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 301 Plainfield Road r
'yracuse, New York 13212 Don Hill Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Suite 550 4520 East West Highway
- Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. Paul D.
Eddy New York State Public Serice Commission Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station-Unit II P.O.
Box 63
- Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. Richard M. Kessel Chair and Executive Director State Consumer Protection Board 99 Washington Avenue
- Albany, New York 12210 Mr. Richard Abbott, Unit 2 Station Superintendent Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation P. 0.
Box 32
- Lycoming, NY 13093 Mr. Thomas Perkins, General Supt.
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation P. 0.
Box 32
- Lycoming, NY 13093
I ht
RE(VEST FOP, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FIRST TEN-YEAR INTERVAL INSERVJCE INSPECTION PROGRAM NINE MILE POINT, UNIT 2 A.
For the pipe-to-sweepolet welds included in Request for Relief No.
RR-IWB-6, provide further justification to support the determination of impracticality.
Discuss the attempts that have been made to examine the pipe-to-sweepolet welds from the sweepolet side (e.g.,
access for the examination, sizes of search units used, etc.).
B.
For the 134 RDS system integral attachment welds included in Request for Relief No. RR-IWC-4, discuss the limitations with regard to performing liquid penetrant examinations instead of magnetic particle examinations in order to meet the Code requirements.
4
~ 5 l