ML17055B443
| ML17055B443 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/28/1986 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17055B441 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8604080022 | |
| Download: ML17055B443 (4) | |
Text
4 v
~
~
gP,R RfgI
~ C 0
Cy A.0O
@II',
~**<<+
t UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO. 80 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO.
DPR-63 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NO.
1 DOCKET NO. 50-220
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By application dated October 17, 1985, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (the licensee) requested an amendment to Appendix A of Facility Operating License No.
DPR-63 for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit No.
1.
The amendment would modify the Technical Specifications (TS) by adding the words "hot shutdown" to Section 6.2.2 to the required times a licensed Senior Operator must be in the control room.
This change does not present a
new procedure or situation, but merely clarifies an existing one.
2.0 EVALUATION The proposed chanae to the TS requested bv the licensee adds the words "hot shutdown" to Section 6.2.2 to the required times a licensed Senior Operator must be in the control room.
The proposed nomenclature chanaI.
has been initiated to improve the overall performance of Nine Mile Point Unit l.
The existing TS require a licensed Senior Reactor Operator to be in the control room durinq power operations and when the emerqency plan is activated.
Current plant practice, however, requires a licensed Senior Operator to he in the control room during hot shutdown.
The proposed change does not present a new procedure or situation, but merely clarifies an existinq one, and therefore is acceptable.-
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
This amendment relates to changes in recordkeeoinq, reporting, or administrative procedures or requirements.
Accordingly, this amendment meets the eliqibility criteria <or categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
"~R nDOc~ 86Oapa
. 86Oe0800~=----
O5OOOpqo PDR
~
V I'~
I I hl
4.0 CONCLLJSION We have concluded, based on the considerations that:
( 1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endanqered by operation in the proposed
- manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common de<ense and the security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
J. Kelly Dated:
March 28, 1986
g J
I
,, ~