ML17053D596
| ML17053D596 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/21/1983 |
| From: | Regan W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mangan C NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| RTR-REGGD-09.003, RTR-REGGD-9.003 NUDOCS 8303300128 | |
| Download: ML17053D596 (6) | |
Text
MAR 2 f 3983 Mr. C. V. Mangan, Vice President Nuclear Engineering lI Licensing Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard liest
- Syracuse, New York 13202
Dear fir. Hangan:
Re:
Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410:
Responses to the Commission's Reg. Guide 9.3 Me are in receipt of your letter dated February 14, 1983 and accompanying data responses to the Commission's Regulatory Guide 9.3.
The 9.3 data are designed to provide the staff with information concerning the changed activities of prospective operating licensees since the termination of the construction permit antitrust review.
An operating license antitrust review is not required unless the staff determines that significant changes have'ccurred in the licensee's activities or proposed activities that would detrimentally impact on competition.
For staff to make such an evaluation, we would appreciate responses to the following questions and clarifications of the applicants'nitial 9.3 data responses as follows:
1.
The responses provided by all five applicants to question "l(h)"
were too general and seemed to concentrate on the cooperative venture or study portion of'he request at the expense of the portion dealing with requests for electric service.
Each applicant, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Rochester Gas 8
Electric Corporation, New York State Electric and Gas Corporation, Central Hudson Gas 5 Electric Corporation and Long Island Lighting
- Company, should provide a, "Summary of requests or indications of interest by other electric power wholesale or retail distributors, and licensee's res onse, for any type of electric service or cooperative venture or study."
This sundry list should identify to the extent possible, pertinent dates, parties and types of service requested.
8303300i28 83032i R ADOCK 05000410 POR i
l
/
ovwcaW SURNAME)
DATCW NRC FORM 318 (10.80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
e 0
'I
~
~
OFFtCEP SURNAME/
DATEP Additionally, please provide specific clarificatfons for the following applicants:
2.
New York State Electric and Gas Corporation:
a) Question "l(f)"part 3.
Hhy dfd the Village of Greene cease taking power from NYSEG on October 31, 1980?
How much power (in terms of megawatts) was NYSEG supplying the Village prior to the transfer of service?
b) Question "1(f)R part 3.
How large was the peach Lake Utilities system fn terms of peak load?
c) Question "1(h)".
Provide your best estimate of the in-service date for the gas-fired plant planned by Gas Alternative
- Systems, Inc. to be located in NYSEG's Auburn District.
3.
Rochester Gas and Hectric Corporation:
a) Question "l(f)",part 4.
Please list all acquisitions and mergers (and dates) by RGSE regardless of type.
4.
Long Island Lighting Company:
a) Question "l(h)":
In addition to the blanket omission of data referred to above, f.e., the listing of parties requesting services along with LILCO responses, staff <<ould like to know the identities of the four companies which have expressed an interest in the Jamesport coal plant.
b) At the time of LILCO's Appendix L submission in 1978 which accompanied a request for an amendment to the Nine Nile Point 2 constr uction permit, LILCO described certain "on-going" discussions with the Village of Greenport concerning re-establishing an interconnection with the electric system operated by Greenport.
Have these discussions concluded and if so, with what result?
5.
Ilfagara Hohawk Power Corporation:
a) The transmission agreement between the Power Authority
.of New York, Niagara Mohawk and New York State Gas 8
Electrfc to transmit power and energy from PASNY's Niagara River Hydro Station to the pennsylvania border'for use by the member coops of the Allegheny Hectric Cooperative was to expire on June 30, 1976.
Was the agreemeht terminated, ff so, when?
Did the Allegheny Electric Coop or any of fts member systems seek renewal of this agreement?
( 10 80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
9 e
a b) Just prior to the time the City of fhrssena became an operating power entity, the City alleged that Niagara Mohawk refused to enter into a transmission agreement to wheel PASNY energy over Niagara Vsohawk's system to the system being planned by the City.
What is the~
status of this relationship now that the City of Vi~ssena operates its own electric system?
c)
Has Miessena made additional requests to Niagara Mohawk for any type of electric service since the City became an operating entity7 Elaborate in conjunction with your more detaii edresponse to question "I(h)" ~su ra We would appreciate your response to these questions within thirty days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact Iir. William Lambe of my staff at (301) 492-4922.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely, Original signed by W. H. Regan, Jr'.
Wm. H. Regan, Jr., Chief Site Analysis Branch Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DIS RIBUTION ockets SAB Rdg SAB Plant WLambe AToalston WRegan WJohnston PDR LPDR NSIC TERA
- MHaughey, LPM'"
- BVogler, OELD OFFICE)
SURNAMEtb OarEt>
'AB:AEAS WLambe:ll 3//'1/83 ATo dion 3/)9/83 "N¹ 3g.j/83 NRC FORM 318
( IO 80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
~
c
,P'
,P r
t I
'