ML16161A204
| ML16161A204 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1994 |
| From: | Wiens L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Tuckman M DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| GL-88-20, TAC-M83649, TAC-M83650, TAC-M83651, NUDOCS 9408050131 | |
| Download: ML16161A204 (3) | |
Text
Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-2 J0 28, 1994
,,and 50-287
'Mr. M. S. Tuckman Senior Vice President
,Nuclear Generation Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 1006 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006
Dear Mr. Tuckman:
SUBJECT:
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 - REVIEW OF RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER NO. 88-20, SUPPLEMENT NO. 4 - INDIVIDUAL PLANT EXAMINATIONS FOR EXTERNAL EVENTS (TAC NOS. M83649, M83650, AND M83651)
The NRC issued Supplement 4 to Generic Letter 88-20 on June 28, 1991, to require each licensee and each construction permit holder to conduct an individual plant examination of external events (IPEEE).
Guidance was provided with the generic letter supplement in the form of NUREG-1407, "Procedural and Submittal Guidance for the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities." The supplement requested a response that would a) identify the method and approach selected for the IPEEE, b) describe the method to be used if it has not previously been submitted for staff review, and c) identify the milestones and schedule for performing the IPEEE and submittal of the results to the NRC.
Following our review of your initial response to Supplement 4, we informed you by letter on June 16, 1992, that your scheduled completion date did not support the Commission's goal of closure on the severe accident issue by mid-1994. You subsequently informed us of your revised date or provided additional justification for your completion date.
We have reviewed your letter dated September 10, 1992, and, although later than the staff would have preferred, we have determined that your schedule is acceptable. Please inform us of any changes to your schedule or methodology.
Sincerely,
/s/
L. A. Wiens, Project Manager Project Directorate 11-3 9408050131 940728 Division of Reactor Projects -
I/II PR ADOCK 05000269',,
_ PDR Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page FLLE CENTER CoPY DISTRIBUTION Docket File G. Lainas OGC NRC & Local PDRs H. Berkow ACRS (10)
PD23 Reading File L. Wiens E. Merschoff, RII S. Varga L. Berry R. Hernan R. Clark T-10 F-13 OFF LA:PD23*Q E PM:P 23:DRPE, 14)
- DRPE NAME LBerry LWns:dt 1t gerkow DATE
/_
_94 f
/94
/
/94 Document Names,.-.G: \\OCONEE\\0C083649.LTR
p AR REG(,,
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 28, 1994 Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 Mr. M. S. Tuckman Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 1006 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006
Dear Mr. Tuckman:
SUBJECT:
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 - REVIEW OF RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER NO. 88-20, SUPPLEMENT NO. 4 -
INDIVIDUAL PLANT EXAMINATIONS FOR EXTERNAL EVENTS (TAC NOS.. M83649, M83650, AND M83651)
The NRC issued Supplement 4 to Generic Letter 88-20 on June 28, 1991, to require each licensee and each construction permit holder to conduct an individual plant examination of external events (IPEEE).
Guidance was provided with the generic letter supplement in the form of NUREG-1407, "Procedural and Submittal Guidance for the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities."
The supplement requested a response that would a) identify the method and approach selected for the IPEEE, b) describe the method to be used if it has not previously been submitted for staff review, and c) identify the milestones and schedule for performing the IPEEE and submittal of the results to the NRC.
Following our review of your initial response to Supplement 4, we informed you by letter on June 16, 1992, that your scheduled completion date did not support the Commission's goal of closure on the severe accident issue by mid-1994. You subsequently informed us of your revised date or provided additional justification for your completion date.
We have reviewed your letter dated September 10, 1992, and, although later than the staff would have preferred, we have determined that your schedule is acceptable. Please inform us of any changes to your schedule or methodology.
Sincerely, L. A. Wiens, Project Manager Project Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects -
I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page
Mr. J. W. Hampton Duke Power Company Oconee Nuclear Station cc:
A. V. Carr, Esquire Mr. Steve Benesole Duke Power Company Compiance 422 South Church Street Duke Power Company Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Oconee Nuclear Site P. 0. Box 1439 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esquire Seneca,,South Carolina 29679 Winston and Strawn 1400 L Street, NW.
Mr. Marvin Sinkule, Chief Washington, DC 20005 Project Branch #3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Robert B. Borsum 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 Babcock & Wilcox Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Nuclear Power Division Suite 525 Ms. Karen E. Long 1700 Rockville Pike Assistant Attorney General Rockville, Maryland 20852 North-Carolina Department of
- Justice, Manager, LIS P. 0. Box 629 NUS Corporation Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 2650 McCormick Drive, 3rd Floor Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Mr. G. A. Copp Licensing -
ECO50 Senior Resident Inspector Duke Power Company U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 526 South Church Street Route 2, Box 610 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 IDayne H. Brown, Director Regional Administrator, Region II Division of Radiation Protection U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission North Carolina Department of 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 Environment, Health and Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Natural Resources P. 0. Box 27687 Max Batavia, Chief Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621