LER-2016-001, Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Caused by One Main Steam Safety Valve Outside Its As-Found Lift Set Point Test Acceptance Criteria |
| Event date: |
|
|---|
| Report date: |
|
|---|
| 2472016001R00 - NRC Website |
|
text
-~*Entergx NL-16-045 May 2, 2016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk 11545 Rockville Pike, TWFN-2 F1 Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box249 Buchanan, N.Y. 10511-0249 Tel (914) 254-6700 Lawrence Coyle Site Vice President
SUBJECT:
Licensee Event Report# 2016-001-00, Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Caused by a Main Steam Safety Valve Outside Its Required As-Found Lift Setpoint Range" Indian Point Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-247 DPR-26
Dear Sir: or Madam:
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 73(a)(1 ), Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. (ENO) hereby provides Licensee Event Report (LER) 2016-001;..00. The enclosed LER identifies an event where there was a Technical Specification prohibited condition for an inoperable Main Steam Safety Valve (MSSV), which is reportable under 10 CFR 50. 73(a)(2)(i)(B).
This condition was recorded in the Entergy Corrective Action Program as Condition Report CR-IP2-2016-01204.
There are no new commitments identified in this letter. Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Robert Walpole, Manager, Regulatory Assurance at (914) 254-6710.
Sincerely, cc:
Mr. Daniel H. Dorman, Regional Administrator, NRC Region I NRC Resident Inspectors Ms. Bridget Frymire, New York State Public Service Commission
Abstract
\\
On March 4, 2016, during the performance of surveillance procedure 2-PT-R006, Main Steam Safety Valve (MSSV) MS-45B failed to lift within the Technical Specification (TS) as-found required range of +/-
3% of the setpoint pressure.
Valve MS-45B lifted at 1125 psig, 29 psig outside its acceptance range of 1034 to 1096 psig and 5.7% above its 1065 psig setpoint.
The valve was declared inoperable, then subsequently restored to operability upon two successful lifts within the required setpoint range without the need for adjustment.
Nine other MSSVs that were tested lifted within the as-found required setpoint range.
The apparent cause for the failure was internal friction due to spindle rod wear, which causes the spindle rod to bind against internal components.
Corrective actions were modification of MS-45B and twelve other MSSVs, and the replacement of their spindle rods.
The event had no effect on public health and safe.ty.
l\\IRC =
(If more space is required, use additional copies of (If more space is required, use additional copies of. (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE
I SEQUENTIAL I REVISION NUMBER NUMBER 001 00 5
OF This event had no effect on the health and safety of the public. There were no actual safety consequences for the event because there were no accidents or transients requiring the MSSVs.
5 There was no significant potential safety impact of the condition under reasonable and credible alternate conditions.
Had an accident or transient occurred during the condition of the out of tolerance MSSV, the condition would not have significantly affected accident mitigation capability and the MSSVs overpressure function would have been adequate.
The design basis of the MSSVs is to limit the secondary system pressure to 110% of design pressure when passing 100% of design steam flow.
Each MS line has an ADV capable of releasing steam to the atmosphere.
The ADVs have the capability to relieve approximately 10% of total steam.
The MSSV design'basis is sufficient to cope with any anticipated operational occurrence or accident considered in the Design Basis Accident and transient analysis.
The events that challenge the relieving capacity of the MSSVs, and thus Reactor Coolant System pressure, are those characterized as decreased heat removal events, whose evaluations are presented in UFSAR Chapter 14.
Of these, the full power loss of external electrical load without steam dump is the limiting event.
The limiting UFSAR Chapter 14 transients which do not credit the ADVs and which are impacted by the higher MSSV setpoint were evaluated and it was concluded that the acceptance criteria for'the transients would have been met with the out of tolerance MSSV.
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000286/LER-2016-001, Regarding Safety System Functional Failure Due to an Inoperable Containment Caused by a Flaw on the 31 Fan Cooler Unit Service Water Return Coil Line Affecting Containment Integrity | Regarding Safety System Functional Failure Due to an Inoperable Containment Caused by a Flaw on the 31 Fan Cooler Unit Service Water Return Coil Line Affecting Containment Integrity | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000247/LER-2016-001, Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Caused by One Main Steam Safety Valve Outside Its As-Found Lift Set Point Test Acceptance Criteria | Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Caused by One Main Steam Safety Valve Outside Its As-Found Lift Set Point Test Acceptance Criteria | | | 05000247/LER-2016-002, Regarding Automatic Actuation of Emergency Diesel Generators (Edgs) Due to 480 Vac Bus Undervoltage Condition and Loss of Residual Heat Removal (RHR) While in Cold Shutdown | Regarding Automatic Actuation of Emergency Diesel Generators (Edgs) Due to 480 Vac Bus Undervoltage Condition and Loss of Residual Heat Removal (RHR) While in Cold Shutdown | | | 05000247/LER-2016-003, Regarding Technical Specification (TS) Prohibited Condition Due to an Inoperable 21 Main Boiler Feedwater Pump Discharge Valve for Greater than the TS Allowed Outage Time | Regarding Technical Specification (TS) Prohibited Condition Due to an Inoperable 21 Main Boiler Feedwater Pump Discharge Valve for Greater than the TS Allowed Outage Time | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000247/LER-2016-004, Re Unanalyzed Condition Due to Degraded Reactor Baffle-Former Bolts | Re Unanalyzed Condition Due to Degraded Reactor Baffle-Former Bolts | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000247/LER-2016-005, Regarding Technical Specification (TS) Prohibited Condition Due to a Surveillance Requirement Never Performed for Testing the Trip of the Main Boiler Feedwater Pumps | Regarding Technical Specification (TS) Prohibited Condition Due to a Surveillance Requirement Never Performed for Testing the Trip of the Main Boiler Feedwater Pumps | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000247/LER-2016-006, Regarding Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Due to Inoperable 138 Kv Offsite Circuits Caused by a Disconnected Safety Injection Signal to the Station Auxiliary Transformer Load Tap Changer | Regarding Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Due to Inoperable 138 Kv Offsite Circuits Caused by a Disconnected Safety Injection Signal to the Station Auxiliary Transformer Load Tap Changer | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000247/LER-2016-007, Safety System Functional Failure and Common Cause Inoperability of the Emergency Core Cooling System Due to Violation of Containment Sump Debris Barrier Integrity | Safety System Functional Failure and Common Cause Inoperability of the Emergency Core Cooling System Due to Violation of Containment Sump Debris Barrier Integrity | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000247/LER-2016-008, Regarding Technical Specification Required Shutdown Due to Not Completing Weld Repairs to Defect in Service Water Pipe Elbow to Inlet Nozzle of Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger within TS AOT | Regarding Technical Specification Required Shutdown Due to Not Completing Weld Repairs to Defect in Service Water Pipe Elbow to Inlet Nozzle of Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger within TS AOT | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System | | 05000247/LER-2016-009, Regarding Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Actuation of the Trip Logic of the Reactor Protection System During Preparation for Testing | Regarding Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Actuation of the Trip Logic of the Reactor Protection System During Preparation for Testing | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000247/LER-2016-010, Regarding Safety System Functional Failure Due to an Inoperable Containment Caused by a Through Wall Defect in a Service Water Supply Pipe Elbow to the 24 Fan Cooler Unit | Regarding Safety System Functional Failure Due to an Inoperable Containment Caused by a Through Wall Defect in a Service Water Supply Pipe Elbow to the 24 Fan Cooler Unit | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) |
|