ML15357A489
| ML15357A489 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/2015 |
| From: | David Silk Operations Branch I |
| To: | Dominion Nuclear Connecticut |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15072A211 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC U01903 | |
| Download: ML15357A489 (15) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: H :\\\\<;\\nAP tJr\\,,}- 3_
Date of Exa~ q j J~ - 11/i<J l ~
if NRG Developed by: Written:
Facility D
II Operating Facility NRG D Target Task Description (Reference)
Chief Examiner's Date*
Initials
-180 1,
Examination administration date confirmed (C, 1,a; C,2,a and b)
J r0
-150 2,
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C, 1,d; C2,e) vrl
-150 3,
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C2,c)
~ 1v>
-150 4,
Corporate notification letter sent (C,2,d)
~ ~
[-120]
5, Reference material due (C, 1,e; C,3,c; Attachment 3)
~
{-90}
6, Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1,
~
ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2, ES-401N-1/2, ES-401-3, ES-401N-3, ES-401-4, and ES-401 N-4, as applicable (C, 1,e and f; C,3,d)
{-85}
7, Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee ([)
(C2,h; C,3,e)
{-60}
8, Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as
~
applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, ES-401 N-6, and any Form ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, or ES-301-2 updates), and reference materials due (C, 1,e, f, g and h; C,3,d)
-45 9,
Written exam and operating test reviews completed, (C,3J) l
-30 10, Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C, 1,1; C2g; ES-202) 0J
-21 11, Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C,2,h; C,3J) r-11J
-21 12, Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C, 1,j; C,2J and h; C,3,g)
~"'*~
-14 13, Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C, 1 J; C2,i; ES-202)
)( ~
-14 14, Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C,2,i; C,3,h)
~D
-7 15, Facility licensee management queried regarding the licensee's views on the
~
examination, (C2 j)
-7 16, Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm
~
qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C,2,i; ; ES-202, C,2,e; ES-204)
-7 17, Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee
&OJ (C,3,k)
-7 18, Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC cAl examiners (C,3,i)
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter, They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee,
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRG, ES-201, Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Y\\i\\\\s-t-one...- l}nir 3 DateofExamination: 'f/1'1-lf I'S'°_; ef,JJ:t l}i)
Initials Item
- 1.
w R
I T
T E
N
- 2.
s I
M u
L A
T 0
R
- 3.
w A
L K
T H
R 0
u G
H
- 4.
G E
N E
R A
L Task Description
- a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
- b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
- a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
- b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
- c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
- c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
- b. Assess whether the 1 O CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
- c.
Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
- a. Author
- b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
- c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d.
NRC Supervisor Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 26 of 28
/V\\ ' \\ \\ s ~
i'\\.:t
~
lvl 5' NR-C L ;* u.... ~ e.
G',)<. "'- V"\\
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 'f i'"/ /
'l:ft!c date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been allhOrized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination rn To the best of l kkswleie, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during r\\_, the week(s) of t'tJf t- ~ dt5'. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not
~ instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
~ below and authorized by the NRC.
ll)
<g PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2) 11 DATE NOTE 10.~;~~~<rf'W
',~~~: ===~ ~~ -
~13.S+/-~f"e~ L....J'AckS<f\\1 14.L_4, v/""' Ac;~
15.../cwu t/f/Cro+:
NOTES: *(]-"'~'A_E.Att}..!r ~.->c><5At ~~~~' iW6 e.:= cMrvi 'SE'J;J~etry 81JP5{: wdfvtA) ff.I-
@ - ~\\ /t~I; I'<-ff- ~ c.o-p; b~~,e-l'4 N/L'- CJ'U-
~--~... ;,-.,..~.iuJ. f<o~J-R°/u. c_.a.J-.~J
~I t'>"' h~i <:J/ pka~
0,"'
'1/2..3./J'> °'"'J G.( vu{F,'-J)
~Q. ~:tP ~+- J~wly u-...7 C'iQ...,',.~.-""~1-,b,,,
~
h>
~'?
v"'-11~,.,.; "T-J pe,.,...!~*'-'
Q "2J f A\\J.._ Sc.on-ON v PtC...'tt,o:.AJ, Ct;iN~c..~ ~'1 f'tS Ce'-L Pttc.vS A/JO Vt:N..1r*CD liE l>tO I a... j " {
J.Jor b1"u.... cr( AP '1 E" ~AJY\\. i.v ;;-~* 171,.r-r:r"' "µ\\( o.-.i4u*111ait1 t.Gu '~sctJS.
Y.
3
/\\'\\J\\>io~ 3 2o I~
f\\J Q (__
I Lu.-u Ex~
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of I~ tS'-'f Z./ JS' as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been au horized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination rn To the best of my e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during r\\., the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not
~ instruct, evaluat, or pr vi e erformance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
~ below and authorized by the NRC.
Q) cc CD Q,
CX>
JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGN~UREJ1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE
~;p--
11.2..__ e -it a/w
- g):
C/2-/.-1\\_
~-=--
I
./_~
s-..;: -
~\\
'l-1.H7 opr.....,,,_
~
1-;r;T;S _, -
~
'W::!:f_...
NOTES:
<[) Fo...+v Stv 1<... lc.l~ J J ; J t\\..O f-v" e< 1~ \\'.. "17 kl'IO.wlJ ~ of N R. ( 1£ )(cJ-. (.Q.-. +e.J.
P~~ 2 \\) r 3
fl\\,r\\ I >-p,~ 3 2~1>
NI< c_
Lf t..D-i~
""Cl\\. v/11 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of "f fl y/t S'- ?/2! /15as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been autti'orized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination 8j To the best of mY. knowledg, I id not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during
"' the week(s) of t) b( From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not
~ instruct, evaluate, or provi e er'formance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
~ below and authorized by the NRC.
ru co CD PRINTED NAME
~~.~~~
())
- 3. ('Au'-
<;; '-'f ti.LU> I+,J 4../~In <-Utw~lt'
- 5..; g.~ ~
... -<--,\\ 0G I.A.~
- 6.
d~"S~
- 7. 1'111\\CJ;;r Qi,
- 8. ______
9.. ______ _
10.. ______ _
11.. ______ _
12.. ______ _
13.. ______ _
- 14. ______ _
- 15. ______
NOTES:
r DATE DATE NOTE
'hili~ >.-< -
r=
'lilfjI_:
9r ~S" ~?!ff#~~~~.<£____
ltM I) ~
~,. ,,_/"""'...,.
'1111/lf" 1r~r-
- l. 'i--
~r-
~/lj.-
_E}jiJjt~
PJ~ 3 r.if 3
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilit : 1\\,'\\ I LL STD 0 f _3 Date of Examination: q t 'i 1 t]'
O eratin Test Number: 2. k IS--
- a.
- b.
- c.
- d.
- e.
- 1.
General Criteria There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a
licants at the desi nated license level.
- 2.
Walk-Through Criteria
- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- b.
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s, if a licable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRG examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3.
Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a co is attached.
- a.
Author
- b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
- c.
NRG Chief Examiner(#)
- d.
NRG Supervisor NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- Independent NRG reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301, Page 24 of 27 Initials a
b*
c#
Hf Mf Hf f
I
~~5,fif
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Rev0/1 8/20/15 Facility: Millstone 3 Date of Exam: 9/14/15 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I 3
/4 Operating Test No.: 2K15 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service,
- R- ~g MP but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
,~ r\\
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
J
~ tJ'i.P
- 3.
Each event description consists of t,
the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated a
~
. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
,f/
t'\\f
. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
A/)
- 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
l-W
£1~ MP J
I (.r
- 5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete I~~
evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
~
- 6.
lftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
~ ~~
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
w Cues are given.
11
- 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
~ rf iZ,
µp
- 8.
The scenarios have been validated.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance )I It deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity
~~ ~f is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 9.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other l,J I!-
I~ D ~f scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
fl I~
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form jl. ~~ W' along with the simulator scenarios).
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable
~i ~~ l"\\P rating factors.
(Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
I
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on v,
t'\\f' Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
I~
4
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
/, ~
'~ tJ\\.P
~
t Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 / 1 / 3 I 4 IL- "'. Y\\f'
- 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 4131 3 I 4 (I )
D MP
- 3.
Major transients (1-2) 1 / 1 / 1 I 1 v ~ 1 ~ W'
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / 1 / 2 I 1 ti MP
.A "ll
)
- 5.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 / 1 / 0 I 1
/
~ ft..>
- 6.
EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 1 / 2/ 3 I 2
/ -
J Mf v
/J NOTE:
. The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- Independent NRG reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301, Page 25 of 27 fjt.
'/1J J) rJ
~
r!
~
- 4 4
tJ
{)
bl{
~
~
l
~
~
ES-301 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 A
E p
v 1
p E
N CREW POSITION L
T I
s A
B c
R T
0 A
T 0
c p
N y
p T
E R0-1, 2 RX
[Kl NOR 2
SRO-I l/C 3,6 D
MAJ 5
SRO-U TS D
R0-3 RX
[Kl NOR 2
SRO-I l/C 3,6 D
MAJ 5
SRO-U TS D
R0-4 RX 2
[Kl NOR SRO-I l/C 1,4,7 D
MAJ 5
SRO-U TS D
RO RX D
NOR SRO-I l/C D
MAJ SRO-U TS D
Transient and Event Checklist Page 1of3 Date of Exam: 9/14/15 Scenarios 2
3 (SPARE)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION s
A B
s A
B R
T 0
R T
0 0
c p
0 c
p 2
1,3,5 4
2 1,3,5 4
2 4
Form ES-301-5 Rev 0/2 8/19/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 4
M T
I CREW POSITION 0
N T
s A
B A
I R
T 0
L M
0 c
p u
M *)
R I
u 1
1 1
0 2
2 1
1 1
3,6,10 8 4
4 2
5 3
2 2
1 0
2 2
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
5 4
4 2
2 2
2 1
0 2
2 1
1 1
0 2
2 1
1 1
3,6,10 6
4 4
2 5
3 2
2 1
0 2
2 1
1 0
1 1
1 4
4 2
2 2
1 0
2 2
Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls" (ATC) and "balance-of-plant" (BOP) positions.
Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (1/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Page 2of3 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 Date of Exam: 9/14/15 A
E Scenarios p
v 1
2 3 (SPARE)
E p
CREW L
N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T
POSITION I c s
A B
s A
B s
A B
A T
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 N
y 0
c p
0 c
p 0
c p
T p
E RO RX 2
D NOR 2
1/C 1,3,4, SR0-11, 3 6,7 Cg]
MAJ 5
4 SRO-U TS 1,4 D
RO RX 2
2 D
NOR 1/C 1,4,7 1,3,5 SR0-12, 4 Cg]
MAJ 5
4 SRO-U TS 1,3 D
RO RX 2
2 D
NOR SR0-15 1/C 1,3,4, 1,3,5 67 Cg]
MAJ 5
4 SRO-U TS 1,4 1,3 D
RO RX D
NOR SRO-I l/C D
MAJ SRO-U TS D
Form ES-301-5 Rev 0/2 8/19/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 4
M T
0 I
CREW POSITION N
T I
s A
B A
M R
T 0
L u
0 c
p M *)
R I
u 2
2 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
1,4,7, 9
4 4
2 8
5 3
2 2
1 2
0 2
2 2
3 1
1 0
1 1
1 1,3,4, 6,7,8, 13 4
4 2
10 5
3 2
2 1
1,4 4
0 2
2 2
3 1
1 0
1 1
1 1,4,7, 12 4
4 2
8 5
3 2
2 1
4 0
2 2
1 1
0 1
1 1
4 4
2 2
2 1
0 2
2 Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls" (ATC) and "balance-of-plant" (BOP) positions.
Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 A
E p
v 1
p E
N CREW POSITION L
T I
s A
B c
R T
0 A
T 0
c p
N y
T p
E RO RX D
NOR SRO-I l/C
[R]
MAJ SRO-U TS D
RO RX
[R]
NOR SRO-I l/C
[R]
MAJ SRO-U TS D
RO RX
[R]
NOR SRO-I l/C
[R]
MAJ SRO-U TS D
RO RX D
NOR SRO-I l/C D
MAJ SRO-U TS D
Transient and Event Checklist Page 3 of 3 Date of Exam: 9/14/15 Scenarios 2
3 (SPARE)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION s
A B
s A
B R
T 0
R T
0 0
c p
0 c
p 1
3,4,6, 7,8 5
2,4 1
3,6,8 5
1 4,7 5
Form ES-301-5 Rev 0/2 8/19/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 4
M T
I CREW POSITION 0
N T
s A
B A
I R
T 0
L M
0 c
p u
M *)
R I
u 1
1 1
0 1
1 1
5 4
4 2
1 2
2 1
2 0
2 2
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 3
4 4
2 1
2 2
1 0
2 2
1 1
0 1
1 1
1 2
4 4
2 1
2 2
1 0
2 2
1 1
0 1
1 1
4 4
2 2
2 1
0 2
2 Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls" (ATC) and "balance-of-plant" (BOP) positions.
Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 R0-1,2 w SRO-I D Competencies SRO-U D Page 1 of 3 Date of Examination: 9/14/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 APPLICANTS R0-3 w R0-4 w
RO SRO-I D SRO-I D
SRO-I SRO-U D SRO-U D
SRO-U Rev 0/1 8/19/15 D
D D
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 BOP ATC BOP BOP ATC ATC BOP BOP 3,5,6 1,3,4, 2,3,6, 3,5,6 1,3,4, 1,4,5, 4 2,3,6, lnterpreUDiagnose 5,6, 10 5,6, 7
10 Events and Conditions 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 2,4,7 2,3,5, Comply With and 5,6 4,5,6, 6,10 5,6 4,5,6, 5,7 6, 10 Use Procedures (1) 7 7
2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 2,4,7 2,3,5, Operate Control 5,6 4,5,6, 6,10 5,6 4,5,6, 5,7 6,10 Boards (2) 7 7
2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 2,4,7 2,3,5, Communicate 5,6 4,5,6, 6,10 5,6 4,5,6, 5,7 6,10 and Interact 7
7 Demonstrate Suoervisorv Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
ES-301, Page 27 of 27 3
4
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 RO D
SR0-11,3 0 Competencies SRO-U D
p 2 f 3 age 0
Date of Examination: 9/14/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 APPLICANTS RO D
RO D
RO SR0-12,4 0 SR0-15 0 SRO-I SRO-U D SRO-U D
SRO-U Rev 0/1 8/19/15 D
D D
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 SRO BOP ATC ATC SRO SRO SRO SRO ATC 1,3,4, 4
1,4,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4,5 1,2,3, 1,3,4, 1,3,4, 1,4,7, Interpret/Diagnose 5,6,7 8
7
,6 4,6,7, 5,6,7 5,6 8
Events and Conditions 8, 10 1,2,3, 2,4,7 1,2,4, 1,2,4, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 4,5,6, 5,7,8, 5,7
,5,6,7 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 5,7,8, Comply With and 7
10 7,8, 7
7 10 Use Procedures (1) 10 2,4,7 1,2,4, 1,2,4, 1,2,4, Operate Control 5,7,8, 5,7 5,7,8, Boards (2) 10 10 1,2,3, 2,4,7 1,2,4, 1,2,4, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 4,5,6, 5,7,8, 5,7
,5,6,7 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 5,7,8, Communicate 7
10 7,8, 7
7 10 and Interact 10 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 4,5,6,
,5,6,7 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, Demonstrate 7
7,8, 7
7 Suoervisorv Abilitv (3) 10 1,4 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,3 Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
ES-301, Page 27 of 27 3
4
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 RO D
SRO-I D Competencies SRO-U D age 0
p 3 f 3 Date of Examination: 9/14/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 APPLICANTS RO D
RO D
RO SRO-I D SRO-I D
SRO-I SRO-U D SRO-U D
SRO-U Rev 0/1 8/19/15 D
D D
SCENARIO (SPARE)
SCENARIO (SPARE)
SCENARIO (SPARE)
SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 SRO ATC BOP 2,3,4, 3,5,6, 4,5,7 lnterpreUDiagnose 5,6,7, 8
Events and Conditions 8
1,2,3, 1,3,5, 1,2,4, Comply With and 4,5,6, 6,8 5,7 Use Procedures (1) 7,8 1,3,5, 1,2,4, Operate Control 6,8 5,7 Boards (2) 1,2,3, 1,3,5, 1,2,4, Communicate 4,5,6, 6,8 5,7 and Interact 7,8 1,2,3, Demonstrate 4,5,6, Suoervisorv Abilitv (3) 7,8 2,4 Comply With and Use Tech. Soecs. (3)
Notes:
( 1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
ES-301, Page 27 of 27 3
4
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: f'\\t \\~Nt.... 3 Dale of Exam: "/11/ 1y Exam Level:
RO ~SRO W' Initial Item Description a
- b.
c*#
- 1.
Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
~
5<
tJ\\ I'
- 2.
- a.
NRC KIMJ are referenced for all questions.
fl 7 Mf
- b.
Facility learning objeclive!; sre referenced as available.
- 3.
SRO questions are appropriate in at;Gordance witl'l Section D.2.d of ES-401
~
Mf 4
The sampling process was random and systMlatlc (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO queaUons wGrn (L
y fv'\\f repeated from the last two NRC licenairig exams, consult the NRRINRO 01.. program office).
- 5.
Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicsted below (oheci<. the item that applies) and appears appropriate
_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
/(
y
~e audit exam was oompleted before the license exam was started; or.
Mf
_ the examlna~ons were developed independently; or
_the licensee c:artlfles that there is no duplication; or
_other (e;r.plain)
- 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 peroent from the ban~, at least 10 peroent new, and the rest new or Bank Modified New NA
/\\/A tJp.
modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question Ll' /,q 5 f 'J... 1.411 9 fl
~ i\\P distribution(s) at right
- 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA
/VA
!VA tJA e;w;am are written at the comprehensionl analy1>i.s level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected J4 LI I fl y
K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual I
I
~f RO I SRO question distribution(s) at righl I~
- e.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of dlstractors.
IZ s-Mf
- 9.
Question content conforms to speciric KIA statements In the previously approved examination
,I(
'Y' MP outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they ere a!;Bigned; aeviatlons ere justi~ed.
- 10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
f(
~
N\\.P
, i.
The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple Choice Items; the total is oorreot
((
2r Mf and a,grees with the value on the cover sheet Printed Name f Signature Date
- a.
Author R.~ t.'+ 11.,tc-,_ ~~
8Lis!J.>
- b.
Facility Revi~r (*)
y ll<.U_ ;) &6'...t ~
~-iS*t~
~/z-~)1 ':)
- o.
NRC Chief E;Ka.minar (#)
- d.
NRC Regional Supervisor ~:~~
- t[z..5 £rS Note:
Tha facilily reviewer's Initials or signature are not applicaole for NRG-developed examinations.
Independent NRC reviewer Initials Items in Column "c"; chief e;r,arniner concurrence raqulred, ES-401, Page 46 of 50
'd 8980 'ON 8NINIV~1 Sd~
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: f\\; \\I.r"h:>r\\.Q. 3 Date of Exam: ? / ~t/15 Exam Level:
Item Description
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Form ES-403-1 RO [/[sRO I/I Initials a
b c
R 5 ti\\~ 1)7 N/A ;1A
'11f D5 f s JJ'f 05 NjA It~ iJ'( D>
f\\// A I((\\-
~f D>
~ s t-'P-b7 Date
- a. Grader R~b..., ~ Ro,.._ j/11 ~ rL21L1s
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
~ 1k£,.k..'\\ ~
9/~cth}
MA/.lA~ j)..trn-~.Z, ~
S;tlc NRC Chief Examiner(*)'
- - - /,'~
--*- ~
~ /l'l(z/1)
- c.
[;_rO<fl
)
1J:,,., 14-L a
~ Li. ck.it N->
JD/2y5
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
~'V
/
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: H :\\\\<;\\nAP tJr\\,,}- 3_
Date of Exa~ q j J~ - 11/i<J l ~
if NRG Developed by: Written:
Facility D
II Operating Facility NRG D Target Task Description (Reference)
Chief Examiner's Date*
Initials
-180 1,
Examination administration date confirmed (C, 1,a; C,2,a and b)
J r0
-150 2,
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C, 1,d; C2,e) vrl
-150 3,
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C2,c)
~ 1v>
-150 4,
Corporate notification letter sent (C,2,d)
~ ~
[-120]
5, Reference material due (C, 1,e; C,3,c; Attachment 3)
~
{-90}
6, Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1,
~
ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2, ES-401N-1/2, ES-401-3, ES-401N-3, ES-401-4, and ES-401 N-4, as applicable (C, 1,e and f; C,3,d)
{-85}
7, Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee ([)
(C2,h; C,3,e)
{-60}
8, Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as
~
applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, ES-401 N-6, and any Form ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, or ES-301-2 updates), and reference materials due (C, 1,e, f, g and h; C,3,d)
-45 9,
Written exam and operating test reviews completed, (C,3J) l
-30 10, Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C, 1,1; C2g; ES-202) 0J
-21 11, Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C,2,h; C,3J) r-11J
-21 12, Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C, 1,j; C,2J and h; C,3,g)
~"'*~
-14 13, Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C, 1 J; C2,i; ES-202)
)( ~
-14 14, Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C,2,i; C,3,h)
~D
-7 15, Facility licensee management queried regarding the licensee's views on the
~
examination, (C2 j)
-7 16, Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm
~
qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C,2,i; ; ES-202, C,2,e; ES-204)
-7 17, Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee
&OJ (C,3,k)
-7 18, Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC cAl examiners (C,3,i)
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter, They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee,
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRG, ES-201, Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Y\\i\\\\s-t-one...- l}nir 3 DateofExamination: 'f/1'1-lf I'S'°_; ef,JJ:t l}i)
Initials Item
- 1.
w R
I T
T E
N
- 2.
s I
M u
L A
T 0
R
- 3.
w A
L K
T H
R 0
u G
H
- 4.
G E
N E
R A
L Task Description
- a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
- b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
- a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
- b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
- c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
- c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
- b. Assess whether the 1 O CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
- c.
Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
- a. Author
- b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
- c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d.
NRC Supervisor Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 26 of 28
/V\\ ' \\ \\ s ~
i'\\.:t
~
lvl 5' NR-C L ;* u.... ~ e.
G',)<. "'- V"\\
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 'f i'"/ /
'l:ft!c date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been allhOrized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination rn To the best of l kkswleie, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during r\\_, the week(s) of t'tJf t- ~ dt5'. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not
~ instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
~ below and authorized by the NRC.
ll)
<g PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2) 11 DATE NOTE 10.~;~~~<rf'W
',~~~: ===~ ~~ -
~13.S+/-~f"e~ L....J'AckS<f\\1 14.L_4, v/""' Ac;~
15.../cwu t/f/Cro+:
NOTES: *(]-"'~'A_E.Att}..!r ~.->c><5At ~~~~' iW6 e.:= cMrvi 'SE'J;J~etry 81JP5{: wdfvtA) ff.I-
@ - ~\\ /t~I; I'<-ff- ~ c.o-p; b~~,e-l'4 N/L'- CJ'U-
~--~... ;,-.,..~.iuJ. f<o~J-R°/u. c_.a.J-.~J
~I t'>"' h~i <:J/ pka~
0,"'
'1/2..3./J'> °'"'J G.( vu{F,'-J)
~Q. ~:tP ~+- J~wly u-...7 C'iQ...,',.~.-""~1-,b,,,
~
h>
~'?
v"'-11~,.,.; "T-J pe,.,...!~*'-'
Q "2J f A\\J.._ Sc.on-ON v PtC...'tt,o:.AJ, Ct;iN~c..~ ~'1 f'tS Ce'-L Pttc.vS A/JO Vt:N..1r*CD liE l>tO I a... j " {
J.Jor b1"u.... cr( AP '1 E" ~AJY\\. i.v ;;-~* 171,.r-r:r"' "µ\\( o.-.i4u*111ait1 t.Gu '~sctJS.
Y.
3
/\\'\\J\\>io~ 3 2o I~
f\\J Q (__
I Lu.-u Ex~
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of I~ tS'-'f Z./ JS' as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been au horized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination rn To the best of my e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during r\\., the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not
~ instruct, evaluat, or pr vi e erformance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
~ below and authorized by the NRC.
Q) cc CD Q,
CX>
JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGN~UREJ1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE
~;p--
11.2..__ e -it a/w
- g):
C/2-/.-1\\_
~-=--
I
./_~
s-..;: -
~\\
'l-1.H7 opr.....,,,_
~
1-;r;T;S _, -
~
'W::!:f_...
NOTES:
<[) Fo...+v Stv 1<... lc.l~ J J ; J t\\..O f-v" e< 1~ \\'.. "17 kl'IO.wlJ ~ of N R. ( 1£ )(cJ-. (.Q.-. +e.J.
P~~ 2 \\) r 3
fl\\,r\\ I >-p,~ 3 2~1>
NI< c_
Lf t..D-i~
""Cl\\. v/11 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of "f fl y/t S'- ?/2! /15as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been autti'orized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).
Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination 8j To the best of mY. knowledg, I id not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during
"' the week(s) of t) b( From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not
~ instruct, evaluate, or provi e er'formance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted
~ below and authorized by the NRC.
ru co CD PRINTED NAME
~~.~~~
())
- 3. ('Au'-
<;; '-'f ti.LU> I+,J 4../~In <-Utw~lt'
- 5..; g.~ ~
... -<--,\\ 0G I.A.~
- 6.
d~"S~
- 7. 1'111\\CJ;;r Qi,
- 8. ______
9.. ______ _
10.. ______ _
11.. ______ _
12.. ______ _
13.. ______ _
- 14. ______ _
- 15. ______
NOTES:
r DATE DATE NOTE
'hili~ >.-< -
r=
'lilfjI_:
9r ~S" ~?!ff#~~~~.<£____
ltM I) ~
~,. ,,_/"""'...,.
'1111/lf" 1r~r-
- l. 'i--
~r-
~/lj.-
_E}jiJjt~
PJ~ 3 r.if 3
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilit : 1\\,'\\ I LL STD 0 f _3 Date of Examination: q t 'i 1 t]'
O eratin Test Number: 2. k IS--
- a.
- b.
- c.
- d.
- e.
- 1.
General Criteria There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a
licants at the desi nated license level.
- 2.
Walk-Through Criteria
- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- b.
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s, if a licable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRG examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3.
Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a co is attached.
- a.
Author
- b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
- c.
NRG Chief Examiner(#)
- d.
NRG Supervisor NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- Independent NRG reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301, Page 24 of 27 Initials a
b*
c#
Hf Mf Hf f
I
~~5,fif
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Rev0/1 8/20/15 Facility: Millstone 3 Date of Exam: 9/14/15 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I 3
/4 Operating Test No.: 2K15 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service,
- R- ~g MP but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
,~ r\\
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
J
~ tJ'i.P
- 3.
Each event description consists of t,
the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated a
~
. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
,f/
t'\\f
. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
A/)
- 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
l-W
£1~ MP J
I (.r
- 5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete I~~
evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
~
- 6.
lftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
~ ~~
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
w Cues are given.
11
- 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
~ rf iZ,
µp
- 8.
The scenarios have been validated.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance )I It deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity
~~ ~f is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 9.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other l,J I!-
I~ D ~f scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
fl I~
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form jl. ~~ W' along with the simulator scenarios).
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable
~i ~~ l"\\P rating factors.
(Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
I
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on v,
t'\\f' Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
I~
4
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
/, ~
'~ tJ\\.P
~
t Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 / 1 / 3 I 4 IL- "'. Y\\f'
- 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 4131 3 I 4 (I )
D MP
- 3.
Major transients (1-2) 1 / 1 / 1 I 1 v ~ 1 ~ W'
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / 1 / 2 I 1 ti MP
.A "ll
)
- 5.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 / 1 / 0 I 1
/
~ ft..>
- 6.
EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 1 / 2/ 3 I 2
/ -
J Mf v
/J NOTE:
. The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- Independent NRG reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301, Page 25 of 27 fjt.
'/1J J) rJ
~
r!
~
- 4 4
tJ
{)
bl{
~
~
l
~
~
ES-301 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 A
E p
v 1
p E
N CREW POSITION L
T I
s A
B c
R T
0 A
T 0
c p
N y
p T
E R0-1, 2 RX
[Kl NOR 2
SRO-I l/C 3,6 D
MAJ 5
SRO-U TS D
R0-3 RX
[Kl NOR 2
SRO-I l/C 3,6 D
MAJ 5
SRO-U TS D
R0-4 RX 2
[Kl NOR SRO-I l/C 1,4,7 D
MAJ 5
SRO-U TS D
RO RX D
NOR SRO-I l/C D
MAJ SRO-U TS D
Transient and Event Checklist Page 1of3 Date of Exam: 9/14/15 Scenarios 2
3 (SPARE)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION s
A B
s A
B R
T 0
R T
0 0
c p
0 c
p 2
1,3,5 4
2 1,3,5 4
2 4
Form ES-301-5 Rev 0/2 8/19/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 4
M T
I CREW POSITION 0
N T
s A
B A
I R
T 0
L M
0 c
p u
M *)
R I
u 1
1 1
0 2
2 1
1 1
3,6,10 8 4
4 2
5 3
2 2
1 0
2 2
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
5 4
4 2
2 2
2 1
0 2
2 1
1 1
0 2
2 1
1 1
3,6,10 6
4 4
2 5
3 2
2 1
0 2
2 1
1 0
1 1
1 4
4 2
2 2
1 0
2 2
Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls" (ATC) and "balance-of-plant" (BOP) positions.
Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (1/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Page 2of3 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 Date of Exam: 9/14/15 A
E Scenarios p
v 1
2 3 (SPARE)
E p
CREW L
N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T
POSITION I c s
A B
s A
B s
A B
A T
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 N
y 0
c p
0 c
p 0
c p
T p
E RO RX 2
D NOR 2
1/C 1,3,4, SR0-11, 3 6,7 Cg]
MAJ 5
4 SRO-U TS 1,4 D
RO RX 2
2 D
NOR 1/C 1,4,7 1,3,5 SR0-12, 4 Cg]
MAJ 5
4 SRO-U TS 1,3 D
RO RX 2
2 D
NOR SR0-15 1/C 1,3,4, 1,3,5 67 Cg]
MAJ 5
4 SRO-U TS 1,4 1,3 D
RO RX D
NOR SRO-I l/C D
MAJ SRO-U TS D
Form ES-301-5 Rev 0/2 8/19/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 4
M T
0 I
CREW POSITION N
T I
s A
B A
M R
T 0
L u
0 c
p M *)
R I
u 2
2 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
1,4,7, 9
4 4
2 8
5 3
2 2
1 2
0 2
2 2
3 1
1 0
1 1
1 1,3,4, 6,7,8, 13 4
4 2
10 5
3 2
2 1
1,4 4
0 2
2 2
3 1
1 0
1 1
1 1,4,7, 12 4
4 2
8 5
3 2
2 1
4 0
2 2
1 1
0 1
1 1
4 4
2 2
2 1
0 2
2 Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls" (ATC) and "balance-of-plant" (BOP) positions.
Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 A
E p
v 1
p E
N CREW POSITION L
T I
s A
B c
R T
0 A
T 0
c p
N y
T p
E RO RX D
NOR SRO-I l/C
[R]
MAJ SRO-U TS D
RO RX
[R]
NOR SRO-I l/C
[R]
MAJ SRO-U TS D
RO RX
[R]
NOR SRO-I l/C
[R]
MAJ SRO-U TS D
RO RX D
NOR SRO-I l/C D
MAJ SRO-U TS D
Transient and Event Checklist Page 3 of 3 Date of Exam: 9/14/15 Scenarios 2
3 (SPARE)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION s
A B
s A
B R
T 0
R T
0 0
c p
0 c
p 1
3,4,6, 7,8 5
2,4 1
3,6,8 5
1 4,7 5
Form ES-301-5 Rev 0/2 8/19/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 4
M T
I CREW POSITION 0
N T
s A
B A
I R
T 0
L M
0 c
p u
M *)
R I
u 1
1 1
0 1
1 1
5 4
4 2
1 2
2 1
2 0
2 2
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 3
4 4
2 1
2 2
1 0
2 2
1 1
0 1
1 1
1 2
4 4
2 1
2 2
1 0
2 2
1 1
0 1
1 1
4 4
2 2
2 1
0 2
2 Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls" (ATC) and "balance-of-plant" (BOP) positions.
Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two 1/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 R0-1,2 w SRO-I D Competencies SRO-U D Page 1 of 3 Date of Examination: 9/14/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 APPLICANTS R0-3 w R0-4 w
RO SRO-I D SRO-I D
SRO-I SRO-U D SRO-U D
SRO-U Rev 0/1 8/19/15 D
D D
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 BOP ATC BOP BOP ATC ATC BOP BOP 3,5,6 1,3,4, 2,3,6, 3,5,6 1,3,4, 1,4,5, 4 2,3,6, lnterpreUDiagnose 5,6, 10 5,6, 7
10 Events and Conditions 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 2,4,7 2,3,5, Comply With and 5,6 4,5,6, 6,10 5,6 4,5,6, 5,7 6, 10 Use Procedures (1) 7 7
2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 2,4,7 2,3,5, Operate Control 5,6 4,5,6, 6,10 5,6 4,5,6, 5,7 6,10 Boards (2) 7 7
2,3,4, 1,2,3, 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 2,4,7 2,3,5, Communicate 5,6 4,5,6, 6,10 5,6 4,5,6, 5,7 6,10 and Interact 7
7 Demonstrate Suoervisorv Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
ES-301, Page 27 of 27 3
4
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 RO D
SR0-11,3 0 Competencies SRO-U D
p 2 f 3 age 0
Date of Examination: 9/14/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 APPLICANTS RO D
RO D
RO SR0-12,4 0 SR0-15 0 SRO-I SRO-U D SRO-U D
SRO-U Rev 0/1 8/19/15 D
D D
SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 SRO BOP ATC ATC SRO SRO SRO SRO ATC 1,3,4, 4
1,4,7, 1,4,5, 1,3,4,5 1,2,3, 1,3,4, 1,3,4, 1,4,7, Interpret/Diagnose 5,6,7 8
7
,6 4,6,7, 5,6,7 5,6 8
Events and Conditions 8, 10 1,2,3, 2,4,7 1,2,4, 1,2,4, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 4,5,6, 5,7,8, 5,7
,5,6,7 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 5,7,8, Comply With and 7
10 7,8, 7
7 10 Use Procedures (1) 10 2,4,7 1,2,4, 1,2,4, 1,2,4, Operate Control 5,7,8, 5,7 5,7,8, Boards (2) 10 10 1,2,3, 2,4,7 1,2,4, 1,2,4, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,4, 4,5,6, 5,7,8, 5,7
,5,6,7 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 5,7,8, Communicate 7
10 7,8, 7
7 10 and Interact 10 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 4,5,6,
,5,6,7 4,5,6, 4,5,6, 4,5,6, Demonstrate 7
7,8, 7
7 Suoervisorv Abilitv (3) 10 1,4 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,3 Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
ES-301, Page 27 of 27 3
4
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 RO D
SRO-I D Competencies SRO-U D age 0
p 3 f 3 Date of Examination: 9/14/15 Operating Test No.: 2K15 APPLICANTS RO D
RO D
RO SRO-I D SRO-I D
SRO-I SRO-U D SRO-U D
SRO-U Rev 0/1 8/19/15 D
D D
SCENARIO (SPARE)
SCENARIO (SPARE)
SCENARIO (SPARE)
SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 SRO ATC BOP 2,3,4, 3,5,6, 4,5,7 lnterpreUDiagnose 5,6,7, 8
Events and Conditions 8
1,2,3, 1,3,5, 1,2,4, Comply With and 4,5,6, 6,8 5,7 Use Procedures (1) 7,8 1,3,5, 1,2,4, Operate Control 6,8 5,7 Boards (2) 1,2,3, 1,3,5, 1,2,4, Communicate 4,5,6, 6,8 5,7 and Interact 7,8 1,2,3, Demonstrate 4,5,6, Suoervisorv Abilitv (3) 7,8 2,4 Comply With and Use Tech. Soecs. (3)
Notes:
( 1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
ES-301, Page 27 of 27 3
4
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: f'\\t \\~Nt.... 3 Dale of Exam: "/11/ 1y Exam Level:
RO ~SRO W' Initial Item Description a
- b.
c*#
- 1.
Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
~
5<
tJ\\ I'
- 2.
- a.
NRC KIMJ are referenced for all questions.
fl 7 Mf
- b.
Facility learning objeclive!; sre referenced as available.
- 3.
SRO questions are appropriate in at;Gordance witl'l Section D.2.d of ES-401
~
Mf 4
The sampling process was random and systMlatlc (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO queaUons wGrn (L
y fv'\\f repeated from the last two NRC licenairig exams, consult the NRRINRO 01.. program office).
- 5.
Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicsted below (oheci<. the item that applies) and appears appropriate
_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
/(
y
~e audit exam was oompleted before the license exam was started; or.
Mf
_ the examlna~ons were developed independently; or
_the licensee c:artlfles that there is no duplication; or
_other (e;r.plain)
- 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 peroent from the ban~, at least 10 peroent new, and the rest new or Bank Modified New NA
/\\/A tJp.
modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question Ll' /,q 5 f 'J... 1.411 9 fl
~ i\\P distribution(s) at right
- 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA
/VA
!VA tJA e;w;am are written at the comprehensionl analy1>i.s level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected J4 LI I fl y
K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual I
I
~f RO I SRO question distribution(s) at righl I~
- e.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of dlstractors.
IZ s-Mf
- 9.
Question content conforms to speciric KIA statements In the previously approved examination
,I(
'Y' MP outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they ere a!;Bigned; aeviatlons ere justi~ed.
- 10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
f(
~
N\\.P
, i.
The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple Choice Items; the total is oorreot
((
2r Mf and a,grees with the value on the cover sheet Printed Name f Signature Date
- a.
Author R.~ t.'+ 11.,tc-,_ ~~
8Lis!J.>
- b.
Facility Revi~r (*)
y ll<.U_ ;) &6'...t ~
~-iS*t~
~/z-~)1 ':)
- o.
NRC Chief E;Ka.minar (#)
- d.
NRC Regional Supervisor ~:~~
- t[z..5 £rS Note:
Tha facilily reviewer's Initials or signature are not applicaole for NRG-developed examinations.
Independent NRC reviewer Initials Items in Column "c"; chief e;r,arniner concurrence raqulred, ES-401, Page 46 of 50
'd 8980 'ON 8NINIV~1 Sd~
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Facility: f\\; \\I.r"h:>r\\.Q. 3 Date of Exam: ? / ~t/15 Exam Level:
Item Description
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Form ES-403-1 RO [/[sRO I/I Initials a
b c
R 5 ti\\~ 1)7 N/A ;1A
'11f D5 f s JJ'f 05 NjA It~ iJ'( D>
f\\// A I((\\-
~f D>
~ s t-'P-b7 Date
- a. Grader R~b..., ~ Ro,.._ j/11 ~ rL21L1s
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
~ 1k£,.k..'\\ ~
9/~cth}
MA/.lA~ j)..trn-~.Z, ~
S;tlc NRC Chief Examiner(*)'
- - - /,'~
--*- ~
~ /l'l(z/1)
- c.
[;_rO<fl
)
1J:,,., 14-L a
~ Li. ck.it N->
JD/2y5
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
~'V
/
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6