ML15264A391
| ML15264A391 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 05/30/1986 |
| From: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8606250167 | |
| Download: ML15264A391 (3) | |
Text
May 30, 1986 Dockets Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 Mr. Hal B. Tucker Vice President - Nuclear Production Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 33189 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
Dear Mr. Tucker:
SUBJECT:
VOLUME REDUCTION INCINERATOR-REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Re:
Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 By letter dated June 10, 1985, you requested our approval to operate a low-level radioactive waste incinerator at the Oconee Nuclear Station. In a September 6, 1985 letter, we requested additional information concerning this submittal.
By letters dated October 9, October 25 and December 13, 1985, you responded to that request.
We have been reviewing this information and your latest May 9, 1986 letter and we need the additional information identified in the enclosure to complete our review. We request that you respond to this request for additional information within thirty days of the receipt of this letter.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, John F. Stolz, Director PWR Project Directorate #6 Division of PWR Licensing-B
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/enclosure:
See next page Distribution:(D-cket File NRC & L PDRs Branch 6 Files Rlngram CMcCracken JStolz HPastis JPartlow BGrimes OELD ACRS 10 FMiraglia EBrach Hrnstein PWR6 PWR#6 PWR#
HPastis
-GMeGrace4n JStol
/7086 r
/70/86 f'/16/86 E3606250167 860530 PDR ADOCK05000269 PPD
Mr. H. B. Tucker Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Power Company Units Nos. 1, 2 and 3 cc:
Mr. William L. Porter Mr. Paul F. Guill Duke Power Company Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 33189 Post Office Box 33189 422 South Church Street 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 220, 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Manager, LIS NUS Corporation 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 2, Box 610 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W.
Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. Heyward G. Shealy, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Office of Intergovernmental Relations 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Honorable James M. Phinney County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WASTE VOLUME REDUCTION INCINERATOR OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-269, 50-270 AND 50-287
- 1. Provide additional information needed for the staff's environmental assessment described in 10 CFR 51.30; namely, a brief discussion of:
- a. The need for the proposed action;
- b. Alternatives to the proposed action; and
- c. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives.
The information should include a quantitative comparative assessment of the economic costs and radiation exposure costs (worker and public person rems) of the proposed action and all reasonable alternatives, including the "no action" alternative. The bases should be provided for each assess ment, and should include the decontamination factors (DFs) for the volume reduction system.
- 2. Provide a quantitative assessment of the impact of airborne effluents from the volume reduction system on the habitability of the reactor control rooms. The assessment should consider radioactive and non-radioactive materials, and toxic and non-toxic materials in the airborne effluents under accident and normal operating conditions.
The bases should be pro vided for each assessment including DFs for the volume reduction system.