ML15224A561

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-269/89-22,50-270/89-22 & 50-287/89-22 on 890619-0716.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Operations,Surveillance Testing,Maint Activities,Safeguards & Radiation Protection & Plant Startup from Refueling
ML15224A561
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/24/1989
From: Shymlock M, Skinner P, Wert L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML15224A562 List:
References
TASK-2.F.2, TASK-TM 50-269-89-22, 50-270-89-22, 50-287-89-22, NUDOCS 8908010011
Download: ML15224A561 (7)


See also: IR 05000269/1989022

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCMMISSION

REGION II

'

W101

MARIETTA ST., N.W.

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323

Report Nos:

50-269/89-22,

50-270/89-22, 50-287/89-22

Licensee:

Duke Power Company

422 South Church Street

Charlotte, N.C.

28242

Docket Nos.:

50-269, 50-270, 50-287

License Nos.:

DPR-38, DPR-47,.DPR-55

Facility Name: Oconee Nuclear Station

Inspection Conducted:

June 19 - July 16, 1989

Inspectors:

~

~/~47

P. H. Skinner, Senior Resident Inspector

tate/Signed

L. D. e

eside '

VInspector

at Si ned

Approved by:

M. B. Shymlock, Section Chief

ate

igned

Division of Reactor Projects

SUMMARY

Scope:

This routine, announced inspection involved resident inspection on-site in the

areas of operations, surveillance testing, maintenance activities, safeguards

and radiation protection, plant startup from refueling, TMI action items, Lee

Steam Station tour, licensed operator requalification program, and inspection

of open items.

Results:

During this period the inspectors noted a continuing strength in the licensees

Integrated Scheduling effort. The outage planned for 43 days was accomplished

in 44.5 days.

C)

I7

.(t

G.ic

REPORT DETAILS

1. Persons Contacted

Licensee Employees

  • M. Tuckman, Station Manager

C. Boyd, Site Design Engineer Representative

R. Campbell, Lee Steam Station Manager

D. Couch, Keowee Hydro Station Manager

  • T. Curtis, Compliance Engineer

J. Davis, Technical Services Superintendent

D. Detherage, Operations Support Manager

  • W. Foster, Maintenance Superintendent

T. Glenn, Instrument and Electrical Support Engineer

D. Havice, Instrument & Electrical Engineer

C. Harlin, Compliance Engineer

D. Hubbard, Performance Engineer

E. Legette, Assistant Engineer Compliance

H. Lowery, Chairman, Oconee Safety Review Group

R

c

Morgan, SeniorQA Manager

  • G. Rothenberger, Integrated Scheduling Superintendent
  • R. Sweigart, Operations Superintendent

Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators,

mechanics, security force members, and staff engineers.

NRC Resident Inspectors:

  • P.H

Skinner

  • L.D. Wert
  • Attended exit interview

2.

Plant Operations (71707)

The inspectors reviewed plant operations throughout the reporting period

to verify conformance with regulatory requirements, technical specifica

tions (TS),

and administrative controls.

Control

room logs, shift

turnover records, and equipment removal and restoration records were

reviewed routinely.

Discussions were conducted with plant operations,

maintenance, chemistry, health physics, instrument and electrical (I&E),

and performance personnel.

Activities within the control rooms were monitored on an almost daily

basis.

Inspections were conducted on day and on night shifts, during

week days and on weekends.

Some inspections were made during shift

change in order to evaluate shift turnover performance. Actions observed

2

were conducted as required by the Licensees Administrative Procedures.

The complement of licensed personnel on each shift inspected met or

exceeded the requirements of TS.

Operators were responsive to plant

annunciator alarms and were cognizant of plant conditions.

Plant tours were taken throughout the reporting period on a routine

basis. The areas toured included the following:

Turbine Building

Auxiliary Building

Units 1, 2 and 3 Electrical Equipment Rooms

Units 1, 2 and 3 Cable Spreading Rooms

Units 1, 2 and 3 Penetration Rooms

Station Yard Zone within the Protected Area

Standby Shutdown Facility

Units 1/2 Spent Fuel Pool Room

Keowee Hydro Station

Lee Steam Station

During the plant tours,

ongoing activities, housekeeping,

security,

equipment status, and radiation control practices were observed.

Unit 1 -

Oconee Unit 1 began this period at 100 percent full power.

On June 26,

1989,

power was reduced to 72 percent due to

problems with Main Turbine Control Valve Number 3 (CV-3).

On

June 30, the unit underwent a runback from 98 percent power to

63 percent power.

The runback was caused by a failure in the

'lA' Feedwater Pump control circuitry.

Power was further

reduced on June 30 to 30 percent and repairs were made to CV-3.

Power was returned to 100 percent full power on July 4, 1989.

Unit 2 -

Unit 2 began this period in a scheduled refueling outage.

On July 4, 1989 the outage was completed (see paragraph 6).

Unit 2 returned to 100 percent full power operation on

July 10,

after some delays- due to dispatcher requests and

problems with the '2A' Feedwater Pump inboard bearing.

Unit 3 -

Unit 3 operated at 100 percent power for the entire report

period except for a one day power reduction to 81 percent on

June 21 as requested by the dispatcher.

During routine tours of the Keowee Hydro Station, the inspectors noted

that the Keowee control room Alarm Response Procedures require review and

updating. The procedures presently utilized were approved in early 1973

and do not address all the annunciators available.

Some of the actions

listed appear to be out of date due to changes made since the response

procedures were approved. Discussions with the on shift Keowee operators

indicate that these procedures would be relied upon in certain conditions.

3

This was discussed with Keowee and station management who acknowledged

that the procedures required updating and stated that plans had already

been made to complete such revisions after the Keowee procedure upgrade

process (currently in progress) is completed. While 'emergency start' of

the Keowee units from Oconee blocks (or prevents) many features from

affecting Keowee operation, correct alarm response procedures could play

an important role in operation of the hydroelectric units during certain

conditions.

This is identified as Inspector Followup Item 269,

270,

287/89-22-01: Update of Keowee Hydro Station Alarm Response Procedures.

No violations or deviations were identified.

3. Surveillance Testing (61726)

Surveillance tests were reviewed by the inspectors to verify procedural

and performance adequacy. The completed tests reviewed were examined for

necessary test prerequisites,

instructions, acceptance criteria,

technical content,

authorization to begin work,

data collection,

independent verification where required, handling of deficiencies noted,

and review of completed work. The tests witnessed, in whole or in part,

were inspected to determine that approved procedures were available, test

equipment was calibrated, prerequisites were met,

tests were conducted

according to procedure,

test results were acceptable and systems

restoration was completed.

Surveillances reviewed and witnessed in whole or in part:

MP/1/A/2000/17 Keowee Hydro Station (U-1)

Turbine,

Governor and Generator Weekly Preventive

Maintenance

No violations or deviations were identified.

4. Maintenance Activities (62703)

Maintenance activities were observed and/or reviewed during the reporting

period to verify that work was performed by qualified personnel and that

approved procedures in use adequately described work that was not within

the skill of the trade.

Activities, procedures and work requests were

examined to verify proper authorization to begin work, provisions for

fire, cleanliness, and exposure control, proper return of equipment to

service, and that limiting conditions for operation were met.

Maintenance reviewed and witnessed in whole or in part:

Repairs to '!A' MDEFWP Test Switch

No violations or deviations were identified.

4

5. Safeguards and Radiological Controls Activities (71707)

In the course of the monthly activities, the Resident Inspectors included

review of portions of the licensee's physical security activities.

The

performance of various shifts of the security force was observed in the

conduct of daily activities which included; protected and vital areas

access controls,

searching of personnel,

packages and vehicles, badge

issuance and retrieval, escorting of visitors, patrols and compensatory

posts.

The inspectors observed protected area lighting and protected and

vital areas barrier integrity, and verified interfaces between the

security organization and operations or maintenance.

No violations or deviations were identified.

6. Plant Startup From Refueling (71711) (Unit 2)

Unit 2 commenced zero power physics testing on July 2, 1989, as part of

the final actions required by End of Cycle (EOC)

-

10.

The inspector

witnessed, in part, TT 2/A/0711/11, Unit 2 Cycle 11 Zero Power Physics

Test dated June 26,

1989 and TT 2/A/0811/11,

Unit 2 Cycle 11 Power

Escalation Test dated June 28, 1989.

In addition the inspector conducted

a walkdown of the emergency feedwater system and the electrical

distribution system to ascertain they had been returned to service as

required.

This outage was scheduled to be performed in 43 days and was

accomplished in 44.5 days.

Some of the major accomplishments of this

outage were the sand blasting and recoating of condenser circulating

water intake piping, overhaul of A and B low pressure turbines, pipe and

fitting erosion inspections and numerous valve overhaul.

No violations or deviations were identified.

7.

TMI Action Items (NUREG-0737)

II.F.2.3 (Closed) Inadequate Core Cooling

Instrumentation.

The

Inadequate Core Cooling Instrumentation (ICC)

at Oconee consist of two

trains, each indicated on a video plasma display. Each train consists of

wide range hot leg level,

reactor vessel

head level,

core exit

thermocouples,

and subcooling monitors.

The TS for this system was

issued on June 6, 1989, as amendment number 174, 174 and 171.

This system

has been installed in each unit and has been in use since 1987.

Normal

operating procedures have been issued for this system and guidance for

use of the system during emergencies are included in the Emergency

Operating Procedure.

The inspectors have reviewed this area in detail

and based on this review this item is complete.

8. Lee Steam Station Tour (71707)

On July 11, 1989, the inspectors visited Duke Power Company's Lee Steam

Station.

The station is located approximately 30 miles from the Oconee

Nuclear Station, and includes three combustion turbine generators which

5

are used as a "backup" emergency power supply in accordance with TS 3.7.

If for some reason,

the Keowee Hydro Station generators (or associated

power paths) become unavailable, continued operation of the Oconee Units

is permitted for a limited time provided that the 4160V standby busses

are energized by one of the Lee turbines via a 100KV transmission line

(isolated from the rest of the grid) and transformer CT-5.

The

inspectors met with the Lee Steam Station manager and several other key

personnel.

A tour of the station was completed with emphasis on the

control room area,

the three combustion turbines and associated

switchvard features.

The inspectors reviewed

and discussed the

procedures to be utilized to supply Oconee via a combustion turbine and

an associated power path isolated from the remainder of the grid.

Detailed discussions were held on how often the turbines were test run,

who operated the turbines and their qualifications and the

methods

available for communicating with

the Oconee Nuclear Station (in regards

to both longterm planning needs and immediate demands of the combustion

turbines). No problems or concerns were noted.

9. Licensed Operator Requalification Program (71707)

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's operator requalification program

with respect to actions taken when a licensed operator fails to pass the

administered requalification examination.

The licensees program is

identified in DPC Employee Training and Qualification System Manual,

Standard #2306.0,

Revision 4, Periodic Training Licensed Operator

Requalification.

Section V.B addresses the removal of personnel from

licensed duties

for

individuals

having significant identified

deficiencies during the retraining programs.

The removal from licensed

duties shall commence within one day of identifying the deficiency. The

retraining will be

provided and

remedial

examination conducted.

Discussions with the Operations Superintendent identified that two

persons in a recent requalification training class had not met the

criteria specified in this standard.

One operator had deficiencies in

the written examination and one with the simulator examination.

Both

individuals were removed from licensed duties and placed in a remedial

retraining program.

Re-examinations were subsequently administered and

both individuals passed and were returned to licensed duties.

10.

Inspection of Open Items (92700)

The following open items are being closed based on review of licensee

reports, inspection,

record review,

and discussions with licensee

personnel, as appropriate:

a.

(Closed) Deviation 269/86-20-02:

Discrepancies Between FSAR and

Installed Seismic Monitoring Instrumentation.

This deviation had

been

generated

because five of the six 2G

peak recording

accelerometers were out of service, apparently due to deterioration

over time.

The licensee made plans to resolve this issue by

replacing the Teledyne PRA-103 instruments with Kinematrics Model

III

6

PAR 400 instruments.

Inspection Report 269,270,287/87-11 states

that 2 of these replacements had been completed and the deviation

would be closed when the remaining four instruments were replaced

(these 4 are located in the Unit 1 Reactor Building).

The inspectors

reviewed Exempt Change packages which indicated that four instruments

had been replaced during the most recent Unit 1 outage.

Installation

procedures could not be located for the remaining two instruments

(tendon gallery, Core Flood Tank first floor support) which were

replaced prior to the outage. The inspectors did review completed

work requests which indicated that PAR 400 instruments at these

locations had been calibrated (February 1989).

Based on this review

this deviation is closed.

b.

(Closed)

IFI 269,270,287/89-11-01:

SSF Diesel Generator Fuel Oil

System Issues.

The inspectors verified that procedural changes and

corrections/improvements in valve labeling had been completed to

correct the discrepancies.

The fuel oil strainers and filters are

being maintained in a configuration which places only one in service

at a time. Explanation notes have been added to the fuel oil system

operating procedures.

All of the issues identified by the

inspectors concerns have been addressed. This item is closed.

11.

Exit Interview (30703)

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 18, 1989,

with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.

The following items

were discussed in detail:

Item Number

Status

Description/Reference Paragraph

269/86-20-02

Closed

Discrepancies Between FSAR and

Installed

Seismic Monitoring

Instrumentation

269,270,287/89-11-01

Closed

SSF Diesel Generator Fuel Oil

System Issues

269,270,287/89-22-01

Open

Update of Keowee Hydro Station

Alarm Response Procedures

The licensee representatives present offered no dissenting comments, nor

did they identify as proprietary any of the information reviewed by the

inspectors during the course of their inspection.