ML15086A257
| ML15086A257 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/26/2015 |
| From: | Balwant Singal Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Hope T Luminant Generation Co |
| Singal B | |
| References | |
| TAC MF5780 | |
| Download: ML15086A257 (1) | |
Text
1 Burkhardt, Janet From:
Singal, Balwant Sent:
Thursday, March 26, 2015 10:30 AM To:
Hope, Timothy' (Timothy.Hope@luminant.com)'
Cc:
Jack.Hicks@luminant.com' (Jack.Hicks@luminant.com)'
Subject:
Acceptance Review - Relief Request 2C3-1, Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 (TAC No. MF5780)
- Tim, By [[letter::CP-201500157, Relief Request No. 2C3-1 for the Reactor Pressure Vessel Leak-Off Flange (Third ISI Interval Start Date: August 3, 2014; Third ISI Interval End Date: August 2, 2023)|letter dated February 24, 2015]] (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML15065A042), Luminant Generation Company LLC (the licensee) submitted relief request 2C3-1 for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 for third 10-year inservice Inspection interval for relief from certain inspection requirements of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI for Reactor Pressure Vessel Leak-off Flange. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
BalwantK.Singal
SeniorProjectManager,ComanchePeakandPaloVerde
Balwant.singal@nrc.gov
3014153016