Letter Sequence Supplement |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML13120A1052013-04-26026 April 2013 Response to Request for Information: Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Seismic Reevaluation Project stage: Response to RAI ML13259A0442013-09-12012 September 2013 Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident - 1.5 Year Response for CEUS Sites Project stage: Response to RAI ML14051A1072014-02-12012 February 2014 Update to Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(f) Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident - 1.5 Year Response for CEUS Sites Project stage: Response to RAI ML14125A3672014-03-12012 March 2014 Drawing LRA-M-2032-1, Rev. Aj, Sump Pump Diagram Radwaste System Project stage: Request BVY 14-019, Notification of Revised Regulatory Commitments Associated with Request for Information Per 10 CFR50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, & 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident .2014-03-12012 March 2014 Notification of Revised Regulatory Commitments Associated with Request for Information Per 10 CFR50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, & 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident . Project stage: Request SBK-L-14052, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites) Response to NRC Request for Information Per 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-2014-03-27027 March 2014 NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites) Response to NRC Request for Information Per 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ich Project stage: Response to RAI NL-14-0343, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites Project stage: Request NRC-14-0017, DTE Electric Companys Seismic Hazard and Screening Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accide2014-03-31031 March 2014 DTE Electric Companys Seismic Hazard and Screening Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Project stage: Response to RAI NRC 2014-0024, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC - Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the F2014-03-31031 March 2014 NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC - Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukush Project stage: Request NL-14-0344, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites Project stage: Request CNL-14-038, Tennessee Valley Authoritys Seismic Hazard & Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Recommendation 2.1 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Acci2014-03-31031 March 2014 Tennessee Valley Authoritys Seismic Hazard & Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Recommendation 2.1 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accide Project stage: Response to RAI RNP-RA/14-0013, Seismic Hazard Evaluation, Response to NRC 10 CFR 50.54(f) Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f)Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of2014-03-31031 March 2014 Seismic Hazard Evaluation, Response to NRC 10 CFR 50.54(f) Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f)Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Project stage: Request ML14099A1962014-03-31031 March 2014 Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC - Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Project stage: Response to RAI ML14092A4162014-03-31031 March 2014 Response to March 12, 2012 Information Request Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites)For Recommendation 2.1 Project stage: Request L-MT-14-045, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(f), Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2014-05-14014 May 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(f), Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Project stage: Response to RAI RA-14-071, Supplemental Information Regarding Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) Sites) - Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Tas2014-08-21021 August 2014 Supplemental Information Regarding Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) Sites) - Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Project stage: Supplement ML14307B7072014-12-10010 December 2014 Supplemental Information Related to Development of Seismic Risk Evaluations for Information Request Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Seismic Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-T Project stage: Other ML14349A4952014-12-10010 December 2014 Proposed Change to Technical Specifications Concerning the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio Project stage: Request ML15034A1062015-02-0303 February 2015 Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Regarding the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio License Amendment Request Project stage: Acceptance Review ML15050A2452015-02-13013 February 2015 Response to Request for Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Regarding the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio License Amendment Request Project stage: Supplement ML15051A2832015-02-19019 February 2015 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim - Acceptance Review Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MF5431) Project stage: Acceptance Review ML15051A0232015-02-25025 February 2015 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure (Tac No. MF5431) Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance ML15051A0322015-02-25025 February 2015 Request for Additional Information Regarding the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio License Amendment Request Project stage: RAI NRC-2015-0053, Federal Register Notice - License Amendment Application; Opportunity to Comment, Request a Hearing, and Petition for Leave to Intervene; Order for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station2015-03-0606 March 2015 Federal Register Notice - License Amendment Application; Opportunity to Comment, Request a Hearing, and Petition for Leave to Intervene; Order for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Project stage: Other ML15051A0242015-03-0606 March 2015 Individual Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination & Opportunity for a Hearing & Order Imposing Procedures for Document Access (MF5431) Project stage: Other ML15051A0272015-03-0606 March 2015 Federal Register Notice - License Amendment Application; Opportunity to Comment, Request a Hearing, and Petition for Leave to Intervene; Order for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Project stage: Other ML15075A0332015-03-11011 March 2015 Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio License Amendment Request Project stage: Response to RAI ML15037A5232015-03-27027 March 2015 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance ML15114A0212015-05-0606 May 2015 Issuance of Amendment Regarding the Minimum Critical Power Ratio License Amendment Request Project stage: Approval 2014-08-21
[Table View] |
Text
En tergy Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 600 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, MA 02360 John A. Dent, Jr.
Site Vice President February 13, 2015 U.S, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
SUBJECT:
Response to Request for Supplemental Information Needed For Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Regarding the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio License Amendment Request (TAC NO.
MF5431)
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR-35
REFERENCES:
- 1. Entergy Letter to NRC, "Proposed Change to Pilgrim Technical Specifications Concerning the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio", dated December 10, 2014 (2.14.076)
- 2. NRC Letter to Entergy, "Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -
Supplemental Information Needed For Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Regarding the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio License Amendment Request (TAC NO. MF5431)", dated February 3, 2015 LETTER NUMBER: 2.15. 015
Dear Sir or Madam:
In Reference 1, Entergy proposed to amend Facility Operating License DPR-35 for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS) by modifying Technical Specification Section 2.1.2. The application proposed to change the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio (SLMCPR) in Technical Specification (TS) Section 2.1.2 from > 1.08 to > 1.1 0 for two recirculation loop operation and from Ž 1.11 to Ž_ 1.12 for single loop operation.
In Reference 2, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff requested that Entergy provide the regulatory criteria used to determine that the license amendment request (LAR) is acceptable.
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Letter Number: 2.15.015 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Page 2 of 3 The applicable regulatory requirements and criteria are:
10 CFR 50.36, "Technical specifications", requires safety limits upon important process variables that are found to be necessary to reasonably protect the integrity of certain of the physical barriers that guard against the uncontrolled release of radioactivity. In this instance, the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio (SLMCPR) ensures the integrity of the fuel cladding during normal and abnormal operations and to mitigate the transient and accident conditions.
10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 10, "Reactor design" states "The reactor core and associated coolant, control, and protection systems shall be designed with appropriate margin to assure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during any condition of normal operation, including the effects of anticipated operational occurrences."
Fuel design limits can be exceeded if the core exceeds critical power. Critical power is a term used for the power at which the fuel departs from nucleate boiling and enters a transition to film boiling. For boiling water reactors (BWRs), the critical power is predicted using a correlation known as the GE (General Electric) critical quality boiling length correlation, or better known as the GEXL correlation. Due to core wide and operational variations, the margin to boiling transition is most easily described in terms of a critical power ratio (CPR), which is defined as the rod critical power as calculated by GEXL divided by the actual rod power. The more a CPR value exceeds 1.0, the greater the margin to boiling transition. The SLMCPR is calculated using a statistical process that takes into account operating parameters and uncertainties. The operating limit MCPR (OLMCPR) is equal to the SLMCPR plus a CPR margin for transients. At the OLMCPR, at least 99.9 percent of the rods avoid boiling transition during steady state operation and transients caused by a single operator error or equipment malfunction.
The proposed increase in the SLMCPR in PNPS TS Section 2.1.2 follows the requirements above and ensures the integrity of the fuel cladding.
This submittal contains no new regulatory commitments.
If you have questions regarding this subject, please feel free to contact Everett P.
Perkins at (508) 830-8323.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing information is true and correct.
Executed on the 13th day of February, 2015 Sincerely, John A. Dent, Jr.
Site Vice President JAD/mew
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Letter Number: 2.15.015 Page 3 of 3 cc:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Dan Dorman Regional Administrator, Region 1 2100 Renaissance Blvd, Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-2713 Ms. Nadiyah Morgan, Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North O-8F4 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Mr. John Priest, Director Massachusetts Department of Public Health Schraft Center Suite 1 M2A Radiation Control Program 529 Main Street Charlestown, MA 02129 Mr. John Giarrusso, Jr.
Nuclear Preparedness Manager Mass. Emergency Management Agency 400 Worcester Road Framingham, MA 01702 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Plymouth, MA 02360