ML14365A127
| ML14365A127 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/2014 |
| From: | Mcneil D NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14344A989 | List: |
| References | |
| ES-301-4 50-456/OL-14, 50-457/OL-14 | |
| Download: ML14365A127 (2) | |
Text
- --- ------------....-,-----
E~_-301 _________
______ Simulator Sce'"!ario Quality Checkl~st _
Form ES-301-4 Facility: Braidwood Date of Exam: 11/10/2014 Scenario Numbers: 142 I 143 I 144 Operating Test Number: 2014 NRC Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of
/( :jh-- A service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
A *tv' ~
- 3.
Each event description consists of
. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
. the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
~ ~
. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
~
the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario
~ f"'
I~
without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
/{ ~ ~
- 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain
/( {k ~
complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
\\
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
,;1 ~
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
~
Cues are given.
- 8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
/1 (\\-- ~
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator
/1 f' ~
performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
/\\ (\\ ~
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.
11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6
~ ~ ~
(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
- 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events
/( [v- ~
specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
A (\\J' I~
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 I 8 I 8 1 :\\I l#lr...
- 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2
!1
\\.!"' ~
- 3.
Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 4 I 4
/
-~ ~
- 4.
Major transients (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2
~ ~ ~
- 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2
/
~ ~
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 0 I 2
/
tv Q,
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) 3 I 4 I 3 I
~ thl
\\
ES-301, Page 25 of 27
ES-301 __________
S_im_ u_la_t_o_r_S_c_e_n_ario Quality Chec~list ____ _ Form ES-301-4 Facility: Braidwood Date of Exam: 11/10/2014 Scenario Numbers: 145 / 14S I Operating Test Number: 2014 NRC Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of
/f ~ ~
service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
11 ~ ~
- 3.
Each event description consists of I
the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event If ~
. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position)
~
the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario 11 r without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
~
- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
.II lfv'V ~
- 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain 1 ~ f;..
complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
/1 Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
t ~
Cues are given.
- 8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
Jf
\\~ l&w\\
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator
- 1 '
performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated
~ ~
to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
/f ~ ~
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.
11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6
~ t ~
(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
- 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events 1 '"'" ~
specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
/) \\i"f'" ~
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 I 8 I A It' ~
- 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 I 1 I
)1 IV" ~
- 3.
Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 4 I j
~ ~
- 4.
Major transients (1-2) 1 I 1 I
.L1
~I\\ ~
- 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1 -2) 3 I 2 I I
()'/\\ I~
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 0 I 11 rv- ~
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) 3 I 2 I 11
[b_ ~
ES-301, Page 25 of 27 i
- "-**