ML14184A290
| ML14184A290 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 10/25/1982 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Utley E Carolina Power & Light Co |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-47, REF-GTECI-A-49, REF-GTECI-RV, REF-GTECI-SY, TASK-A-47, TASK-A-49, TASK-OR NUDOCS 8211100490 | |
| Download: ML14184A290 (4) | |
Text
- .
DISTRIB' N
Ar Docket
. e R. Woods NRC PDR F. Manning OCT 2 5 198 Local PDR K. Kniel Docket No. 50-261 NSIC S. Weiss, RI IRB 1 File P. Baranowsky D. Eisenhut Gray File Mr. E. E. Utley, Executive Vice President OELD Power Supply and Engineering & Construction E. L. Johnson, DEQA:IE Carolina Power and Light Company J. M. Taylor, DRP:IE 411 Fayetteville Street ACRS (10)
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 C. Parrish G. Requa
Dear Mr. Utley:
C. Johnson G. Burdick
Reference:
Letter from P. W. Howe to H. R. Denton, Subject, "Unresolved Safety Issues A-47 and A-49," dated July 7, 1982 In response to your letter dated July 7, 1982, and regarding our meeting with CP&L representatives on July 19, 1982, we believe that these discussions regarding your participation in the resolution of USI A-47 and A-49, for H. B.
Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2, have been very productive. We agree in general with your conditions for participation in the study as described in your letter of July 7 with the following clarifications. These are keyed to the paragraph numbers in your letter of July 7.
- 1. We are pleased to have CP&L participation and technical input in the A-49 study. The technical data you provide we understand will be based on readily available information and, despite reasonable efforts for accuracy, the data may contain errors.
- 2. The NRC project manager for this study is Carl Johnson, Division of Risk Analysis, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, (301) 443-5921.
- 3. We welcome your offer to provide data derived from your PTS project with NSAC.
4 and 6. Regarding CP&L review and comment on reports by the ORNL/INEL study team, we encourage your participation and offer you the same opportunities for comment we provide to the NRC staff. NRC will review plans and progress periodically during the study, and we invite your participation.
Upon completion of significant portions of the study, the study team will issue letter reports. These we will circulate to the NRC staff and to you for comment. The final report we will receive initially in draft form. If you disagree with the final report, you may write a foreword for inclusion in the published version. We want to ensure peer review to enhance the accuracy of the study, but we must avoid censorship to protect the integrity of the technical work.
OFFICE)
SURNAI 8211100490 821025 PDR ADOCK 05000261 DA p
PDR NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1981-335-960
J. A. Jones
-2.-
OCT 2 5 1982
- 5. With regard to your request for direct funding or reimbursement in connection with your effort on A-49, we cannot provide such a commitment at this time. However, we would be willing to discuss this matter in the future if a situation should develop requiring significant information not normally available to a licensee.
- 7. On the matter of the applicability of plant-specific results, we believe that it would be appropriate to use generic criteria for screening purposes.
Analysis available from work performed in support of A-49 would be acceptable in satisfying plant-specific requirements.
8 and 9. We propose review meetings to review progress, plans, and schedules.
Regarding the schedule for the ORNL/INEL study of pressurized thermal shock (A-49) at H. B. Robinson, in order to provide efficient time phasing between the three ORNL studies, e.g., Oconee, Calvert Cliffs and H. B. Robinson, we propose to begin the information-gathering phase in November 1982 and to complete the analysis in May 1984. If this is acceptable to you, we would like to discuss the detailed plans and schedule with you at the first review meeting with the ORNL/INEL study team in November 1982, With regard to USI A-47 we agreed, during our July 19, 1982 meeting, to refine our approach to this program and to define more carefully the information that would be needed from you. Although you have declined participation for now, your representatives at the July 19 meeting agreed that when our refined program plan is completed you would review it and perhaps reconsider your decision to participate in A-47.
Sincerely, original signedb?
Darrell.Eisenbut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of.Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page SEE PREVIOUS NRC FORM 318 FOR CONCURRENCES*
OUW L,, D:,DRA*
D:brot DDST*
DDI
- 0R:DL OFFICEt.
4.......................
SUNA~
RBernero Qs).Koller SHMjr.......
n~.
SU N M )
...R.g....:..
g.1.................
SH.. ue....
~e 0 1.. 0....
X 1.as".......0...
DATE
.........91.15 2.........9122.822.9..... 9..2.9.182...
.8....1.4
.82
- 1..
.2 NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1981-335-960
J. A. Jones 2
- 5.
With regard to your request for direct funding or reimbursement in connection with your effort on A-49, we cannot provide such a commitment at this time. However, we would be willing to discuss this matter in the future if a situation should develop requiring significant information not normally available to a licensee.
- 7.
the matter of the applicability of plant-specific results, we believe th t it would be appropriate to use generic criteria for screening purposes.
Ana sis available from work performed in support of A-49 would be acceptable in sa isfying plant-specific requirements.
8 and 9. We opose review meetings to review progress, plans, and schedules.
Regarding the sch ule for the ORNL/INEL study of pressurized thermal shock (A-49) at H. B. Rob son, in order to provide efficient time phasing between the three ORNL studie e.g., Oconee, Calvert Cliffs and H. B. Robinson, we:
propose to begin the in ormation-gathering phase in January 1983 and to complete the analysis in May 1984. If this is acceptable to you, we would like to discuss the detailed plans nd schedule with you at the first review meeting with the ORNL/INEL study te in December 1982.
With regard to USI A-47 we agree during our July 19, 1982 meeting, to refine our approach to this program and t define more carefully the information that would be needed from you. Although u have declined participation for now, your representatives at the July 19 me ing agreed that, when our refined program plan is completed, you would rev w it and perhaps reconsider your decision to participate in A-47.
Sincer Darrell G. Eisen t, Director Division of Licens-g cc:
See next page Distribution:
Docket NRC PDR L PDR CJohnson NSIC GBurdick ORB#1 Rdg RWoods DEisenhut FManning OELD KKniel IE SWeiss, RI ACRS-10 PBaranowsky D:DL CParrish Gray DEisenhut GRequa
? C
)
9/ /82 OFFICEO ORB#l:DL D:DRA D:DFO D.
ORB#l:DL D:DSI AD:OR:DL SURNAMEO GRqua RBernero:.sp KGolle SHana er SVarga RMattson GLainas DATE*
/2
/8 2
9/Z/82 9b/ 2 9/ /82 9/ /82 9/, /82 NRC FORM 318 (10-80)
NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Mr. J. A. Jones Carolina Power and Light Company cc: G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Route 5, Box 266-lA Hartsville, South Carolina 29550 Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Richard S. Salzman Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Dr. W. Reed Johnson Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator - Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303