ML14122A044

Response to a Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request: Change to the MNGP Emergency Plan to Remove the Radwaste Operator as a 60 Minute Responder

ML14122A044
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	04/29/2014
From:	Fili K D Northern States Power Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-MT-14-046
Download: ML14122A044 (56)

Text

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant XcelEnergy@

2807 W County Road 75 Monticello, MN 55362 April 29, 2014 L-MT-14-046 10 CFR 50.90 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Docket No. 50-263 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-22 Response to a Request for Additional Information for License Amendment Request: Change to the MNGP Emergency Plan to Remove the Radwaste Operator as a 60 Minute Responder (TAC No. MF2898)

References:

1) NSPM to NRC, "License Amendment Request: Change to the MNGP Emergency Plan to Remove the Radwaste Operator as a 60 Minute Responder," (L-MT-13-089) dated October 4, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13281A826).

2) NRC e-mail to NSPM, "Conference Call to Discuss Draft RAIs re: E-Plan Change to Remove the Radwaste Operator as a 60-Minute Responder (TAC No. MF2898)," dated January 16, 2014.On October 4, 2013, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90, the Northern States Power Company -Minnesota (NSPM), doing business as Xcel Energy, Inc., submitted a License Amendment Request (LAR) (Reference

1) that proposed changes to the Emergency Plan for the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP). The proposed change would revise the MNGP Emergency Plan to remove the Radwaste Operator as a sixty (60) minute responder.

On January 16, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) suggested a phone call and requested additional information (RAI) from NSPM (Reference

2) to complete their review. The enclosures provide the requested information.

NSPM has reviewed the No Significant Hazards Consideration determination and Environmental Evaluation provided in the LAR and determined that they are unaffected, and still applicable as supplemented by the enclosed additional information.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91, a copy of this response, with enclosure, is being provided to the designated Minnesota Official.

Document Control Desk L-MT-14-046 Page 2 of 2 Summary of Commitments This letter proposes no new commitments and does not revise any existing commitments.

Should you have questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Richard Loeffler at (763) 295-1247.I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Executed on April _!, 2014.Karen D. Fili Site Vice President, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company -Minnesota Enclosures cc: Administrator, Region III, USNRC Project Manager, Monticello, USNRC Resident Inspector, Monticello, USNRC Minnesota Department of Commerce ENCLOSURE 1 MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST: CHANGE TO THE MNGP EMERGENCY PLAN TO REMOVE THE RADWASTE OPERATOR AS A 60 MINUTE RESPONDER (7 pages follow)

L-MT-14-046 Enclosure 1 Page 1 of 7 RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST: CHANGE TO THE MNGP EMERGENCY PLAN TO REMOVE THE RADWASTE OPERATOR AS A 60 MINUTE RESPONDER By letter dated October 4, 2013, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90, the Northern States Power Company -Minnesota (NSPM), doing business as Xcel Energy, Inc., submitted a License Amendment Request (LAR) (Reference

1) that proposed changes to the Emergency Plan for the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP). The proposed change would revise the MNGP Emergency Plan to remove the Radwaste Operator as a sixty (60) minute responder.

On January 16, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) suggested a phone call and requested additional information (RAI)from NSPM to complete their review. This enclosure provides the requested information.

RAI 1: Section 2.0 of the October 4, 2013, submittal states: Results of the OSA [On-Shift Staffing Analysis]

indicated that the Radwaste Operator position was not necessary to perform the specified staff augmentation function (perform repair and corrective actions within 60-minutes, considering the staffing in place). Consequently, NSPM proposes to remove the Radwaste Operator position as one of the 60-minute responders identified within the Emergency Plan.However, Section 3.0 of the October 4, 2013, submittal states: When in SAMGs [Severe Accident Management Guidelines]

the duty operations staff implements the actions as directed by the SAMGs. Non-duty Operations personnel in the TSC and OSC will augment the duty Operations staff. Included in this augmentation is the addition of one Operator, qualified in radioactive waste system operations, in approximately 60mnutes.

L-MT-14-046 Enclosure 1 Page 2 of 7 a. Provide the relevant portions of the OSA, performed in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix E.IV.A.9, to support removing the Radioactive Waste System Operator from the emergency response organization (ERO). This OSA should address both Radwaste Operator maintenance and system operational functions.

Response Procedure A.2-002, "Monticello On-Shift Staffing Analysis," Revision 0, discusses in Table 2 (page 7) the MNGP Design Basis Accident (DBA) / Interim Staff Guidelines (ISG) Analyzed Events. The events evaluated(1) were the following:

1. Land or waterborne or both hostile action directed against the Protected Area 2. Control Rod Drop 3. Loss of Coolant Accident 4. Main Steam Line Break 5. Refueling Accident 6. Anticipated Transient without Scram (ATWS)7. Response actions for an "aircraft probable threat" 8. Control Room fire leading to evacuation and remote shutdown 9. Station Blackout (SBO)10. Appendix R Fire Response A copy of the Phase II Event Analysis Tables pages for these events from the OSA is provided in Enclosure

2. For each event a Table 1 -"On-Shift Positions," a Table 2 -"Plant Operations and Safe Shutdown," and a Table 3 -"Firefighting" (if required for the event) is provided.NEI 10-05, "Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities," (Reference

2) provides guidance for performing the On-Shift Staffing Analysis (OSA). As discussed in the license amendment request (LAR), the OSA did not include the Radwaste Operator (RWO) since this position was not necessary to address the DBA and ISG events analyzed for the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP). Consequently, the OSA makes no presumption that a RWO is available to perform maintenance and system operational functions.

The operations tasks for these events were accomplished in the 60-minute timeframe of the OSA. No tasks were identified that continued after completion of this timeframe, and hence require supplemental personnel, e.g., the RWO for performance.

These insights, together with the determination that radwaste processing after an event is a long-term, recovery operation, support removal of the RWO from the MNGP Emergency Plan. Also, the 1. The Fuel Loading Error Accident and One Recirculation Pump Seizure events were not analyzed since in accordance with NEI 10-05 an analysis was not required.

The Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMGs) are implemented as a Technical Support Center (TSC) function.

L-MT-14-046 Enclosure 1 Page 3 of 7 definition of the "repair or corrective action" function(2) in NEI 10-05 implies that the operational knowledge (e.g., implementation of lockout / tagout controls) possessed by the RWO is not necessary to perform the repair or corrective action functions.

NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Table B-i, "Minimum Staffing Requirements for NRC Licensees for Nuclear Power Plant Emergencies" (Reference 3), provides guidance for staffing personnel to perform various tasks, including repair and corrective actions(3)The current Monticello Emergency Plan staffing table aligns with Table B-1 for the repair and corrective action function, being discussed herein.The duty Operations crew is initially responsible for any emergency repair and corrective actions that may be immediately required prior to Emergency Response Organization (ERO) augmentation.

During the initial stages of an event, major response activities are concentrated on determining the cause of the event and placing the plant in a safe condition through plant manipulations and system alignments.

Major equipment repairs are not expected to be performed during the initial phases of an event. The repair and corrective action functions performed are focused on those necessary to implement the Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP). The duty Operations crew implements the EOPs. Only after the Technical Support Center (TSC)is activated(4) are the Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMGs) entered.At 30-minutes the duty crew is augmented by an electrical maintenance person and an instrumentation and controls (I&C) technician.

At 60-minutes staffing is augmented by an additional mechanical maintenance person, an electrical maintenance person, and the RWO. At 60-minutes the TSC is required to be activated.

Arrival of the RWO occurs effectively concurrent with activation of the TSC. At this point in an event, as described below, the focus is shifting to the TSC directing event response / assessment and the Operations Group Leader (who is a Senior Reactor Operator) provides technical and operational input to the duty Control Room operating staff. Therefore, utilization of the RWO at this transition point from an operations or maintenance perspective is implausible.

After augmentation, technical and operational advice is provided by the Operations Group Leader who reports to the Emergency Director.

The group consists of the Operations Group Leader and all members of the Operations staff including the duty operating crew, off-duty Shift Managers, Control Room Supervisors and all Operators.

2. An action that can be performed promptly to restore a nonfunctional component to functional status (e.g., resetting a breaker), or to place a component in a desired configuration (e.g., open a valve), and which does not require work planning or implementation of lockout /tagout controls to complete.3. Note that several plant Emergency Plans have been identified which do not include a RWO under the repair and corrective action function, among these licensees are the Ginna and Duane Arnold plants.4. Transition to the SAMGs cannot occur unless the TSC is staffed and operational.

L-MT-14-046 Enclosure 1 Page 4 of 7 Also after augmentation, repair and corrective actions are the responsibility of the Maintenance Group under the direction of the Emergency Director.

The Maintenance Group consists of the group leader and members of the mechanical and electrical maintenance groups including I&C personnel designated capable of performing emergency tasks.(5)

The Maintenance Group Leader is responsible for the overall direction of corrective actions including damage control and emergency repairs to systems, components or equipment.

Personnel are assigned according to the skills they possess so that the team is capable of coping with the emergency situation.

Repair and damage control team members are selected from available personnel.

The Operations Support Center (OSC) Coordinator reports to the Maintenance Group Leader and is responsible for the coordination of emergency repair activities initiated out of the OSC. Additionally, personnel are called in as deemed appropriate.

The personnel report to the OSC where they are assigned corrective action tasks by the OSC Coordinator.

There is no need for a RWO until well after the event has been mitigated.

Any radiological waste processing would be performed by an auxiliary operator as part of their normal duties during the recovery phase of the event. Therefore, there is no specific need for an RWO from a system operational perspective.

From an operational support perspective, the RWO is not part of the duty Operations crew who implements the EOPs. Also, as described in the following response, there are no RWO requirements within the SAMGs or within the implementing procedures.

Additionally, it was determined that performance of the operations related activities did not require an additional operator, e.g., the RWO.b. Provide justification that the Radwaste Operator is not required to augment the Operations staff for any activities, including implementation of the SAMGs currently stated in the [station emergency plan] SEP.As described previously, the major initial response activities are concentrated on responding to the event and placing the plant in a safe condition through plant manipulations and system alignments.

Repair and corrective action functions are focused on those necessary to implement EOPs by the duty Operations crew.The SAMGs are entered when a transition point (Primary Containment flooding required) in the EOPs is reached and the duty Shift Manager and Operations Group Leader make a joint decision to transition to the SAMGs. At this point, the TSC assumes the responsibility to assess and select the strategies to be implemented.

When using the SAMGs, the Operations Group Leader directs Control Room response as specified in the SAMGs.5. Control of the mechanical and electrical maintenance and I&C personnel that were called in at the 30 and 60-minute mark, respectively, is transferred to the Maintenance Group Leader.

L-MT-14-046 Enclosure 1 Page 5 of 7 Section 5.3 of the MNGP Emergency Plan describes augmentation of the ERO.Subsection 5.3.1.1, "Plant Operations and Operational Assessment," in the MNGP Emergency Plan describes the responsibilities of the Operations staff. Subsection 5.3.1.1 states: The duty Operations crew retains the responsibility for plant operation throughout an emergency situation.

When in SAMGs the duty operations staff implements the actions as directed by the SAMGs. Non-duty Operations personnel in the TSC and OSC will augment the duty Operations staff. Included in this augmentation is the addition of one Operator, qualified in radioactive waste system operations, within approximately 60 minute-s.The inclusion of the RWO in the last sentence of this paragraph implied that the RWO has a specified function to implement the SAMGs. The sentence was only intended to identify that this operationally oriented individual is included under the "Plant Operations and Operational Assessment" heading, similar to the other non-duty Operations personnel available to provide operational support. The next paragraph in that subsection clarifies that the non-duty Operations personnel provide operational assessment and support repair and corrective action functions, stating: The responsibilities of the non-duty Operations personnel include operational assessment, under the direction of the Emergency Director in the TSC, and support of emergency repair and corrective action efforts in the OSC including Fire Brigade support.The Operations Group provides non-duty personnel to staff and support the OSC.However, there are no tasks identified in the SAMGs and the EOPs that require or specify the RWO for performance.

Therefore, it is proposed to remove the last sentence in the first paragraph of Subsection 5.3.1.1 (struck-through above) since the RWO is not one of the personnel credited with performance of SAMG actions.A review of the SAMGs(6) procedures and the procedures called out in the SAMGs was conducted.

These procedures involve the following types of activities: " Defeating isolations or bypassing signals* Use of alternate injection systems for Reactor Pressure Vessel makeup" Containment spray" Venting or purging Primary Containment

6. Note the beyond-design-basis Extensive Damage Mitigation procedures are activated using available qualified plant personnel and call-outs as necessary.

No specific role for a RWO is specified.

L-MT-14-046 Enclosure 1 Page 6 of 7 These activities are all used in performance of the EOPs as well, and do not contain additional requirements beyond what actions were already being taken in the EOPs prior to entering SAMGs. Also, there are no specific RWO requirements in these procedures.

Therefore, the actions to implement the SAMGs do not require a RWO.RAI 2. Section 3.0 of the October 4, 2013, submittal contains change bars on pages 29 and 30 with no indication or description on what was changed.Provide supporting documentation that identifies and contains the basis for these SEP changes.Response The revision bars were inadvertently retained on the pages of the Emergency Plan that were submitted.

No additional changes beyond the removal of the RWO are proposed.

L-MT-14-046 Enclosure 1 Page 7 of 7 REFERENCE 1. Letter from K. Fili (NSPM) to NRC, "License Amendment Request: Change to the MNGP Emergency Plan to Remove the Radwaste Operator as a 60 Minute Responder," (L-MT-13-089), dated October 4, 2013. (ADAMS Accession No.ML13281A826)

2. NEI 10-05, Revision 0, "Assessment of On-Shift Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities," June 2011. (ADAMS Accession No. ML111751698)

3. NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," dated November 1980.

ENCLOSURE 2 MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST: CHANGE TO THE MNGP EMERGENCY PLAN TO REMOVE THE RADWASTE OPERATOR AS A 60 MINUTE RESPONDER SELECTED PAGES FROM THE MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING PLAN (45 pages follow)

MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 IOTI Page ! 2 of. 100 Figure 6.2 PHASE II EVENT ANALYSIS TABLES Analysis #1: DBA/ISG Event #1 -DBT Hostile Action -Protected Area Table 1'ON-SHIFT POSITIONS ECL: Site Area Emergency Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time T oleLin Tank? R ue" mi) Table#/Line#

Task? Required?(min)1. Shift Manager Monticello E. Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L1 No No T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T51L3 No T5/L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, FP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L2 No No 3. Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L3 No No 4. Nuclear Lead PE&RO Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L4 No No (RO #1) T5/L5 No T5/L7 No 5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L5 No No 6. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L6 No No M/arb Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Raole# /ine Unanlz R ired (min) Table#/Line#

task? Required?7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L7 No No 8. Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L8 No No 9. Nuclear APEO (AEO #3). Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L9 No No 10. Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T5/L5 No No Communicator T5/L6 No T5/L8 No T5/L9 No T5/L10 No T5L11 No T5/L13 No T5/L14 No Notes: No further analysis.

required for this event.M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 14 of 100 Table 2 PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Analysis #1: Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement

-AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Validatio*~Validation 1 Shift Manager Shift Manager Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Reactor Operator #3 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 7 Auxiliary Operator #1 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator Training-8 Auxiliary Operator #2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator Training 9 Auxiliary Operator #3 Nuclear APEO (AEO #3) Operator Training Notes: Security 2 Man Rule in effect after neutralization.

Duck and cover until neutralization.

Duck and cover may affect some AOP actions.Procedures in use: EOP, AOP C.4-L; A.2-1 10 Unit Supervisor-EOP/AOP direction and oversight RO #1 -SCRAM/AOP Actions (RCIC)RO #2 -SCRAM/AOP Actions (RWCU Isolation)

RO #3 -AOP Actions (CR Vent in recirc; standby @ ASDS panel)AO#1 -AOP Actions (RCIC Operations)

AO#2 -AOP Actions (EDG Start)AO#3 -AOP Actions M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 15 of 100 Table 3 FIREFIGHTING Task Analysis Line Performed By Controlling Method 1 None per guidance in NEI 10-05 N/A 2 None per guidance in NEI 10-05 N/A 3 None per guidance in NEI 10-05 N/A 4 None per guidance in NEI 10-05 N/A 5 None per guidance in NEI 10-05 N/A Notes: **DUCK and COVER Fire Brigade. Per assumptions no fire brigade response required.

Fire Brigade stationed at Alternate Fire Brigade Room location after event.M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS.

jRevision 0...h Page 18 of 100 Analysis #2: DBA/ISG Event #2 -Control Rod Drop ECL: Site Area Emergency Table 1 ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time (min) Table#/Line#

Task? Required?1. Shift Manager Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L1 No No T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T5/L3 No T5/L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L2 No No 3. Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L3 No No 4. Nuclear Lead PE&RO Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 T2/L4 No No (RO #1) N/A T5/L5 No 5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/1_5 No No 6. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L6 No No 7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L7 No No M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 age 19of 100 Augmentation

.Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time (min)- Table#/Line#

Task? Required?8. Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T5/L6 No No Communicator T5/L8 No T5/L9 No T5/110 No T5L11 No T5/L1_3 No T5/1_14 No 9. Radiation Protection (RP #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T4/L1 No No 10. Radiation Protection (RP #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T4/L2 No No 11. Chemistry Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 60 T4/L5 No Yes T4/L7 No T4/L8 No T4/L9 No 12. CAS Operator Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T5/L15 No No Notes: TMS required for Chemistry due to competing functions/tasks.

M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 20 of. 100 Table 2 PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Validation

~Validation 1 Shift Manager Shift Manager Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator Training 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator Training Notes: First radiological indication

-SJAE off gas & WRGM indications (per DBA analysis -1.7 Rem @ EAB in 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />).Procedures in use: EOP/AOP: C.5-1400; C.4-A; C.4-B.04.01..B Unit Supervisor-EOP/AOP direction and guidance RO #1 -AOP actions RO #2 -AOP actions AO #1 -AOP actions (as assigned by ROs)AO #2 -AOP actions (as assigned by ROs)M/arb

.I MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT[A.2402 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0'I I Page 21 of 100 Table 3 FIREFIGHTING Task Analysis Line Performed By Controlling Method 1 Not Required per event N/A 2 Not Required per event N/A 3 Not Required per event N/A 4 Not Required per event N/A 5 Not Required per event N/A M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A'2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision0 Page 24 of 100 Analysis #3: DBA/ISG Event #3 -LB LOCA with release and PARs Table 1 ON-SHIFT POSITIONS ECL: Site Area -General Emergency Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Task?(m) Table#/Line#

Required?1. Shift Manager Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L1 No No T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T5/L3 No T5/L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L2 No No (SRO #1)3. Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L3 No No (SRO #2)4. Nuclear Lead PE&RO (RO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L4 No No T5/L5 No 5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L5 No No N/A 6. NulearPE&R (RO#3) ontiello Pla, EP5, Tble .0-1T.- 6NoN 7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L7 No No 8. Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L8 No No 9. Nuclear APEO. (AEO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L9 No N*M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 25 of 100 Augmentation Role ,in Unanalyzed.

TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed-Time Task?(min) Table#/Line#

Required?10. Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T5/L5 No Yes Communicator T5/L6 No T5/L8 No T5/L9 No T5/L10 No T5/L11 No T5/L13 No T5/L14 No.11. Radiation.Protection (RP #1). Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T4/L1 No Yes T4/L6 No 12. Radiation Protection (RP #2). Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T4/L2 No No 13. Chemistry Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 60 T4/L5 No Yes T4/L7 No T4/L8 No 14. GAS Operator Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T5/L15 No No Notes: TMS required for SEC due to Task T5/L3 -SEC is required to be in constant communications with NRC per NEI 10-05 Table 3.1 note 14. This task presents a conflict of responsibility as additional notifications are required during upgrade to General Emergency.

TMS required for Radiation Protection due to competing functions/tasks.

TMS required for Chemistry due to competing functions/tasks.

M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0* Page 26 of 100 Table 2 PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Validatio Validation 1 Shift Manager Shift Manager Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Reactor Operator #3 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 7. Auxiliary Operator #1 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator Training 8 Auxiliary Operator #2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator Training.9 Auxiliary Operator #3 Nuclear APEO (AEO #3) Operator Training Notes: DBA assumes loss of one vital electrical buss Procedures in use: EOP/AOP -C.4-A Unit Supervisor-EOP/AOP direction and guidance RO #1 -AOP actions (SCRAM response actions)RO #2 -AOP actions (SCRAM response actions)RO #3 -AOP actions (BOP actions following SCRAM)AO #1 -AOP actions (SCRAM actions)AO #2 -AOP actions (Loss of electrical buss/multiple AOP actions as directed by ROs)AO #3 -AOP actions (AOP actions related to EDG SW)See Table 2A for listing of EOP/AOP actions M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002.TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page. 27 of 100 Table 2A EOP/AOP ACTIONS Large Break LOCA with Release and PARs Procedure Step/Actions Performance Time (mins) After Procedure Implementation Assigned 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 *20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 Proc/Step Task Resource C.4-B.09.02B Loss of Offsite Power RO#1 X X X X X X X X X X X X PA for CR communicator (SEC) to RO#1 X report to CR C.5-1 100 RPV Control CRS X Check Detail A for Rx STA X Water level Inhibit ADS RO#3 X C.5-2002 Blow Down CRS, STA, X RO#3 C.5-1200 Primary Containment CRS, STA, Control RO#3 Maintain Torus Temp RO#3 x C.4-B.09.02B, Dispatch Operator, step 6 Check out DG for APEO#2 X operation C.4-A, Part A Perform RX Shutdown (Scram) operations C.4-A, Part A, RHR Service water step 28 pump check out and APEO#3 X started A.2-1 04 Classification of Event SM, CRS x X EAL A.2-104, step PA announcement of 6.1.6 the SAE A.2-104, step Perform State/Local

&6.1.4 NRC Notifications for X ALERT and-SAE.A.2-104, step Direct Chem Tech to 6.1.9.a perform EPIP A.2-406 Chem Tech X X X (Off-site Dose Projection)

A.2-104, step RP to monitor plant rad RPT#1 6.1.9.b monitors M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 I! IPage 28 of 100 Large Break LOCA with Release and PARs Procedure Step/Actions Performance Time (mins) After Procedure Implementation Assigned 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 Proc/Step Task Resource C.4-8.09.02B, Re-energize MCC-131, step 13b MCC-131, MCC-141 & APEO#2 X X MCC-142B C.4-B.09.02B, Dispatch Operator to APEO#3 X step 18 check out DG 13 A.2-105 Upgrade to GE Classification of Event SM, CRS X X X EAL A.2-105, step PA announcement of SEC 6.1.5 the GE A.2-105, step Perform State/Local

& SEC 6.1.6 &6.1.7 NRC notifications A.2-105, step Direct Chem Tech to 6.1.10 perform EPIP A.2-406 Chem Tech X X (Off-site Dose Projection)

C.5-1300 Secondary Containment CRS, STA, Control RO#1, 2, & 3 C.5-1400 Radioactivity Release CRS, STA, X Control RO#1, 2, & 3 x M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 Page 29 of 100 Table 3 FIREFIGHTING Task Analysis Line Performed By Controlling Method 1 Not Required per event N/A 2 Not Required per event N/A 3 Not Required per event N/A 4 Not Required per event N/A 5 Not Required per event N/A M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 33 of 10.0 Analysis #4: DBA/ISG Event # 4 -Main Steam Line Break Table 1 ON-SHIFT POSITIONS ECL: Alert Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Augmentation Unanalyzed

Role in. TIVS* Elapsed Time in Task?Reference (m)Table#/Line#

Required?1. Shift Manager Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table N/A T2/L1 No No 5.0-1 T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T5/L3 No T5/L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table N/A T2/L2 No No 5.0-1 3. Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table T2/1L3 No No 5.0-1 N/A 4. Nuclear Lead PE&RO (RO Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table T2/L4 No No#1) 5.0-1 N/A T5/L5 No 5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table N/A T2/L5 No No 5:0-1 6. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table. N/A T2/L6 No No 5.0-1 7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table N/A T2/L7 No No 5.0-1 M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 34 of 100 Lin Onshit PsiionEmegeny PanAugmentation Rlin Unanalyzed Emrgnc Planent ti Role in H ldnn.je TMS Line On-shift Position Elapsed Time Task?Reference (min) Table#/Line#

Required?8. Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 30 T5/L6 No No Communicator 5.0-1 T51L8 No T5/L9 No T5/L 10 No T5L11 No T5/L13 No T5/L14 No 9. Radiation Protection (RP #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 30 T4/L1 No No 5.0-1 10. Radiation Protection (RP #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 30 T4/L2 No No 5.0-1 11. Chemistry Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 60 T4/L5 No Yes 5.0-1 T4/L7 Na T4/L8 No 12. CAS Operator Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table N/A T5/L15 No No 5.0-1 Notes: TMS required for Chemistry due to competing functions/tasks.

M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 35 of 100 Table 2 PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Validation 1 Shift Manager Shift Manager Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator Training 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator Training Notes: DBA assumes CR radiation levels > 15 mR/hr (330 mR/hr). First classification indication for CR personnel.

Procedures in use: EOP/AOP: C.4-A; C.4-B.04.01 .B; C.4-B.02.04.A Unit Supervisor-EOP/AOP direction and guidance RO #1 -AOP actions (SCRAM response)RO #2 -AOP actions (SCRAM response)AO #1 -AOP actions (as directed by ROs)AO #2 -AOP actions (as directed by ROs)M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT.

STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 36 of 100 Table 3 FIREFIGHTING Line Performed By Task Analysis Controlling MK.thod 1 Not Required per event N/A 2 Not Required per event N/A 3 Not Required per event N/A 4 Not Required per event N/A 5 Not Required per event N/A M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS.

Revision 0 , Page 40 of 100 Analysis #5: DBA/ISG Event # 7 -Refueling Accident ECL: Alert Table 1 ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Task?(i) Table#1Line#

Required?(min)1. Shift Manager Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L1 No No T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T5/L3 No T5/L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L2 No No Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 T2/L3 No No 3. N/A Nuclear Lead PE&RO Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L4 No No 4. (RO #1)N/5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 T2/L5 No No N/A T5/L5 No 6. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L6 No No 7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A .T2/L7 No No M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 41 of 100 Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Role#in Task?(mm) Table#/Line#

Required?.. ~~~~~~(min)=:

.,=~e.8. Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T5/L6 No No Communicator T5/L8 No T5/L9 No T5/L10 No T5L11 No T5/L13 No T5/L14 No 9. Radiation Protection Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T4/L1 No No (RP #1)10. Radiation Protection Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table5.0-1 30 T4/L2 No No (RP #2)11. Chemistry Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1' 60 T41L5 No No 12. CAS Operator Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T5/L15 No No Notes: No further analysis required for this event.M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 42 of 100 Table 2 PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Va lid atio Validation 1 Shift Manager Shift Manager Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #3. Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator Training 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator Training Notes: Procedures in use: C.4-B.04.01..B; C.4-B.08.07.A; Ops Manual D.2-05 (Refueling procedure);

9007 Unit Supervisor

-AOP direction and guidance RO #1 -AOP actions (C.4-B.08.07.A)

RO #3 -AOP actions (C.4-B.04.01 .B)AO #1 -AOP actions (verify CAM sample pump off)AO #2 -AOP actions (verify appropriate actions for TB ventilation units)M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERA TING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 43 of 100 Table 3 FIREFIGHTING Task Analysis Line Performed By Controlling Method 1 Not Required per event N/A 2 Not Required per event N/A 3 Not Required per event N/A 4 Not Required per event N/A 5 Not Required per event N/A M/arb.

MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 47 of 100 Analysis #6: DBA/ISG Event # 8 -ATVVS ECL: Alert Table 1 ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time ReqTask?(min) TableiLine Required?1. Shift Manager Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L1 No No T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T5/L3 No T5/L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L2 No No 3. Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L3 No No 4. Nuclear Lead PE&RO Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L4 No No (RO #1)T5/L5 No 5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L5 No No 6. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/ L6 No No 7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L7 No No 8. Nuclear APEO (AEQ #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L8 No No M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 48 of 100 Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Task?Table#/Line#

Required?(min),Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EPý5, Table 5.0-1 30 T5/L6 No No Communicator T5/L8 No T5/L9 No T5/L10 No T5L11 No T5/L13 No T5/L14 No 10. Chemistry Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 60 T4/L7 No No T4/L8 No Notes: No further analysis required for this event.M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0" ~Page 49 of I 0- F Table 2 PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Validation 1 Shift Manager Shift Manager Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Reactor Operator #3 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 7 Auxiliary Operator #1 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator Training 8 Auxiliary Operator #2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator Training Notes: Procedures in use: EOP/AOP -C.4-A; C.4-K; C.4-B.04.01..B; C.4-B.08.07.A Unit Supervisor-EOP & AOP direction and guidance RO #1 -AOP actions (BOP SCRAM actions)RO #2 -AOP actions (manual SCRAM)RO #3 -EOP actions AO #1 -AOP actions AO #2 -AOP actions M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 50 of 100 Table 3 FIREFIGHTING e P e BTask Analysis Line Performed By Controlling Method 1 Not Required per event N/A 2 Not Required per event N/A 3 Not Required per event N/A 4 Not Required per event N/A 5 Not Required per event N/A M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 54 of 100 Analysis #7: DBA/ISG Event # 9 -Response to Aircraft Threat (1 OCFR50.54(hh))

Table I ON-SHIFT POSITIONS ECL: Alert Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Task?(min) Table#/Line#

Required?1. Shift Manager Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L1 No No T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T5/L3 No T5/L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table.5.0-1 N/A T2/L2 No No 3. Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L3 No No 4. Nuclear Lead PE&RO Monticello E Plan,- EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L4 No No (RO #1)T5/L5 No 5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L5 No No 6. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T3/L1 No No 7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T3/L2 No No 8.' Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L6 No No T3/L3 No 9. Nuclear APEO (AEO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L7* No No M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 I TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 1. Page 55 of 100 Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Task?(mi) Table#/Line#

Required?10. Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T5/L5 No No Communicator T5/L6 No'T51L8 No T5/L9 No.T5/110 No T5L11I No T5/L13 No T5/L14 No 11. Radiation Protection Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T3/L4 No No (RP #1)12. Radiation Protection Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T4/L6 No No (RP #2)13. Duty Shift Chemist Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 60 T3/L5 No No Notes: No further analysis required for this event.M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHI1FT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 56 of 100 Table 2 PLAN-T OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Validatio Validation 1 Shift Manager Shift Manager. Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Auxiliary Operator #2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator.Training 7 Auxiliary Operator #3 Nuclear APEO (AEO #3) Operator Training Notes: Procedure in use: AOP C.4-L Unit Supervisor-AOP direction and oversight RO #1 -AOP actions (Reduce Rx Power)RO #2 -AOP actions (start EDG)AO #2 -AOP actions (reduce plant lighting footprint prior to dispersal to FB room)AO #3 -AOP actions (RCIC operation)

M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002.TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 57 of 100 Table 3 FIREFIGHTING L Task Analysis Line Performed By .Controlling Method 1 Nuclear PE&RO (RO #3) -Fire Brigade Operator/Fire Brigade Training Leader 2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator/Fire Brigade Training 3 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator/Fire Brigade Training 4 Radiation Protection (RP #1) RP/Fire Brigade Training 5 Chemistry Chemistry/Fire Brigade Training Notes: Fire Brigade is dispersed not to preclude actions of AOP All Fire Brigade personnel are available for in-plant activities until dispersed M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE:- MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision.0 Page 61 of 100 Analysis #8: DBA/ISG Event # 10 -Control Room Fire with Evacuation (IN 95-48)Table 1 ON-SHIFT POSITIONS ECL: Alert Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS.Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Task?(mn) Table#/Line#

Required?1. Shift Manager Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L1 No No T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T5/L3 No T51L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L2 No No 3. Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L3 No No Nuclear Lead PE&RO Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L4 No No 4. (RO #1)T5/L5 No 5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L5 No No 6. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T3/L1 No No 7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T3/L2 No No 8. Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T3/L3 No No 9. Nuclear APEO (AEO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L6 No No M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision, 0 Page 62 of 100 Augmentation Role in Unanalyied TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Task Required?(min) Table#/Line#.Task

10. Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T5/L6 No No Communicator T5/L8 No T5/L9 No T5/L10 No T5/L11 No T5/L13 No T5/L14 No 11. Radiation Protection Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T31L4 No No (RP #1)12. Radiation Protection Monticello.E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T4/L1 No. No (RP #2)13. Chemistry Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 60 T3/L5 No Yes T4/L8 No T41L9 No Notes: TMS required for Duty Shift Chemist due to competing functions/tasks.

M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 63 of 100 Table 2 PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Validation:

1 Shift Manager Shift Manager Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Auxiliary Operator #3 Nuclear APEO (AEO #3) Operator Training Notes: Procedures in use: AOP -C.4-C; C.4-B.08.05.A; C.4-B.08.07.A Unit Supervisor

-AOP direction and guidance RO #1 -AOP actions (SCRAM and ASDS)RO #2 -AOP actions (SCRAM and as directed by RO #1)AEO#3 -AOP actions (as directed by RO #1)Time Critical Operator Actions for this event have been validated by MNGP Operations personnel.

Validation has determined the all required operator actions can be completed at the ASDS Panel within 15 minutes 30 seconds.Refer to Attachment 1, CR Fire TCOA Validation Package.M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 64 of 100 Table 2 -PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN (CONT'D)Attachment 1 -CR Fire TCOA Validation Package I QF-1 128, Revision 1 (FP-OP-CTC-01 Page 1 of 1 XceI Energy- Time Critical Operator Actions Time Validation

-Summary Sheet 1. Identify Specific Operator Action to be time validated: (include flow rates, equipment failures and locations of equipment if possible)2. Validation Team Members: Team Members Name Department Crew Position for Validation Dale Nygaard Operations Operator Bill Ergen Operations Operator Joe Yarbrough Training Validation Lead Sarah Schwartz Operations TCOA Coordinator 3, Validation Method: (circle selected method) cjimator r Walkthrough

4. Scenarios:

Scenario Title number 4 Fire in Control Room/Cable Sprpading Room Form retained in accordance with record retention schedule identified in FP-G-RM-01.

M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 65 of 100 Table 2 -PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN (CONT'D)Attachment 1 -CR Fire TCOA Validation Package QF-1129, Revision 1 (FP-OP-'CC-01)

Page I of 2 X Im VEnergyl Time Critical operatorActions Time Validation

-Scenario Description

---I vua kthrou-h Scenarios:

lumber: 2. Scenario Title: 4 jApp R Fire 3. Initial Plant Conditions:

4. Equipment Assumed to be Out of Service: Plant at 100% power, Mode I All credited equipment is in service 5. Short Description of Scenario and How it Validates Timed Operator.Actions:

At t=0 a fire will start in the control room resulting in evacuation and the use of the ASDS panel to control plant conditions.

This validates the App R Fire required operator actions.6. Assumed Procedure Flow Path: When the fire is recognized and evacuation is complete, the operator will use C.4-C at the ASDS panel to establish control, perform an emergency depressurization and establish containment cooling.Developed By: Sarah Schwartz Accepted for Use: For m retained in accordance with record retention schedule identified in FP-G-RM-01.

M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 66 of 100 Table 2 -PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN (CONT'D)Attachment I -CR Fire TCOA Validation Package r Time Validation

-Timing Record Sheet Scenario Number: 4 Scenario Title: Appendix RFire Prior to Scenario:

Plant at 100% power, Mode 1. All credited systems are available Specific Events to Be Recorded 1) Control at ASDS established (10 minutes)2) Perform emergency depressurization at ASDS panel (17 minutes)3) Establish Containment Cooling (40 minutes)During Scenario: Scenario Real Time Event Log Time: 0:00 Event: App R fire T = 5 minutes Start Scenario:

Arrival at ASDS Panel 8 minutes, 14 seconds Establish Control at ASDS Panel 12 minutes, 13 seconds Begin depressurization at ASDS Panel 15 mintues, 30 seconds Establish containment cooling Form retained in accordance with record retention schedule identified in FP-G-RM-01, M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page-67 of 100*Table 3 FIREFIGHTING Line Performe Task Analysis Led By Controlling Method 1 Nuclear PE&RO (RO #3) -Fire Brigade Operator/Fire Brigade Training Leader 2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator/Fire Brigade Training 3 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator/Fire Brigade Training 4 Radiation Protection (RP #1) RP/Fire Brigade Training 5 Chemistry Chemistry/Fire Brigade Training Notes: Fire Procedure C.4-B.08.05.A M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 71 of 100 Analysis #9: DBA/ISG Event # 11 -Station Blackout ECL: Site Area Emergency Table 1 ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Task?(min) Table#/Line#

Required?1. Shift Manager Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L1 No No T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T5/L3 No T5/L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L2 No No 3. Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L3 No No 4. Nuclear Lead PE&RO Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L4 No No (RO #1)T5/L5 No 5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO'#2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L5 No No 6. Nuclear PE&RO.(RO

1. 3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L6 No No 7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L7 No No 8. Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L8 No No M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 72 of 100 Augmentation Role.in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Table#/Line#

Task?T ab e#/ ine R eq u ired ?___ (min)9. Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T5/L6 No No Communicator T5/L8 No T5/L9 No T5/L10 No T5/L11 No T5/L13 No T5/L14 No 10. Radiation Protection Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5..0-1 30 T4/L1 No No (RP #1)11. Chemistry Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 60 T4/L7 No Yes T4/L.8 No T41L9 No T4/L10 No 12. CAS Operator Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T5/15 No No Notes: TMS required for Chemistry due to competing functions/tasks.

M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002'TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 73 of 1Q10 Table 2 PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Validation l Shift Manager Shift Manager Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Reactor Operator #3 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 7 Auxiliary Operator #1 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator Training 8 Auxiliary Operator #2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator Training Notes: Procedures in use: EOP/AOP -CA-A; C.4-B.09.02.A Unit Supervisor-Direct EOP/AOP actions RO #1 -AOP actions (electrical back panels; etc.)RO #2 -AOP actions (SCRAM; operate HPCI/RCIC as necessary to maintain RPV level)RO #3 -Perform EOP actions and AOP actions (C.4-B.09.02.A)

AO #1 -AOP actions (directed actions from RO #1 -Fire doors, etc.)AO #2 -AOP actions (SCRAM and trouble shoot EDG electrical per RO)M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 Page 74 of 100 Table 3 FIREFIGHTING I; Task Analysis Line Performed ByTakAlyi Controlling Method 1 Not Required per event N/A 2 Not Required per event N/A 3. Not Required per event N/A 4 Not Required per event N/A 5 Not Required per event N/A M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 78 of 100 Analysis #10: DBA/ISG Event # 12 -Appendix R Fire ECL: Alert Table 1 ON-SHIFT POSITIONS Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line. On-shift Position Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time Task?Table#/L~ine#

Required?(min)1. Shift Manager Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L1 No No T5/L1 No T5/L2 No T5/L3 No T5/L4 No 2. Control Room Supervisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L2 No No 3. Shift Technical Advisor Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L3 No No 4. Nuclear Lead PE&RO Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L4 No No (RO #1)*T5/L5 No 5. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L5 No No 6. Nuclear PE&RO (RO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T3/L1 No No.7. Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T3/L2 No No 8. Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T3/L3 No No 9. Nuclear APEO (AEO #3) Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 N/A T2/L6 No No M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 IPage 79 of 100 Augmentation Role in Unanalyzed TMS Line On-shift Position*

Emergency Plan Reference Elapsed Time- Task?R Table#/Line#

Required?(min)Reurd

10. Shift Emergency Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T5/L6 No No Communicator T5/L8 No T5/L9 No T5/L10 No T5/L11 No T5/L13 No T5/L14 No 11. Radiation Protection Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 30 T3/L4 No No (RP #1)12. Chemistry Monticello E Plan, EP-5, Table 5.0-1 60 T3/L5 No No Notes: No further analysis required for this event.M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 80 of 100 Table 2 PLANT OPERATIONS

& SAFE SHUTDOWN Monticello One Unit -One Control Room Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs, or SAMGs if applicable Task Performance Line Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Vaiation* Validation I Shift Manager Shift Manager Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Control Room Supervisor Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Shift Technical Advisor Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Nuclear Lead PE&RO Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Nuclear PE&RO Operator Training 6 Auxiliary Operator Nuclear APEO (AEO #3) Operator Training Notes: Appendix R area -Intake Scenario Procedures in use: C.4-B.08.05.A; C.4-B.08.07.A Unit Supervisor-AOP direction and guidance RO #1 -AOP actions RO #2 -AOP actions AEO #3 -AOP actions M/arb MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT A.2-002 TITLE.-: MONTICELLO ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS Revision 0 Page 81 of 100 Table 3 FIREFIGHTING n PTask Analysis Line Performed By Controlling Method I Nuclear PE&RO (RO #3) -Fire Brigade Operator/Fire Brigade Training Leader 2 Nuclear APEO (AEO #1) Operator/Fire Brigade Training 3 Nuclear APEO (AEO #2) Operator/Fire Brigade Training 4 Radiation Protection (RP #1) RP/Fire Brigade Training.5 Chemistry Chemistry/Fire Brigade Training Notes: Fire Procedure C.4-B.08.05.A M/arb *