ML14042A180
| ML14042A180 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 01/31/2014 |
| From: | KLD Engineering, PC |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TR-617, Rev 0 | |
| Download: ML14042A180 (50) | |
Text
APPENDIX F Telephone Survey
F. TELEPHONE SURVEY F.1 Introduction The development of evacuation time estimates for the LGS EPZ requires the identification of travel patterns, car ownership and household size of the population within the EPZ.
Demographic information can be obtained from Census data. The use of this data has several limitations when applied to emergency planning. First, the Census data do not encompass the range of information needed to identify the time required for preliminary activities (mobilization) that must be undertaken prior to evacuating the area. Secondly, Census data do not contain attitudinal responses needed from the population of the EPZ and consequently may not accurately represent the anticipated behavioral characteristics of the evacuating populace.
These concerns are addressed by conducting a telephone survey of a representative sample of the EPZ population. The survey is designed to elicit information from the public concerning family demographics and estimates of response times to well defined events. The design of the survey includes a limited number of questions of the form "What would you do if ...?" and other questions regarding activities with which the respondent is familiar ("How long does it take you to ...?")
Attachment A presents the final survey instrument used in this study. A sample size of 384 completed survey forms yields results with a sampling error of +/-5% at the 95% confidence level. The sample must be drawn from the EPZ population.
The preliminary determination of whether a household was located inside the EPZ was based on "land-line" telephone listings with street addresses. Telephone surveys were then conducted using those numbers, selected in random order, until the target level of surveys was completed, or the entire calling list was exhausted. Rejections or households outside the EPZ were discarded. Numbers with "no answer" were re-cycled for up to ten attempts in different time windows.
F.2 Survey Results The results of the survey fall into two categories. First, the household demographics of the area can be identified. Demographic information includes such factors as household size, automobile ownership, and automobile availability. The distributions of the time to perform certain pre-evacuation activities are the second category of survey results. These data are processed to develop the trip generation distributions used in the evacuation modeling effort, as discussed in Section 5.
A review of the survey instrument reveals that several questions have a "don't know" (DK) or "refused" entry for a response. It is accepted practice in conducting surveys of this type to accept the answers of a respondent who offers a DK response for a few questions or who refuses to answer a few questions. To address the issue of occasional DK/refused responses from a large sample, the practice is to assume that the distribution of these responses is the same as the underlying distribution of the positive responses. In effect, the DK/refused responses are ignored and the distributions are based upon the positive data that is acquired.
Limerick Generating Station F-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
F.2.1 Household Demographic Results Household Size Figure F-1 presents the distribution of household size within the EPZ. The average household contains 2.54 people.
Household Size 45%
40%
- 6. 35% -
30%
xo 25%
0- 20%
15%
- 10%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 People per Household Figure F-1. Household Size in the EPZ Automobile Ownership The average number of automobiles available per household in the EPZ is 1.92.
Vehicle Availability 50%
qn
- 40%
0 8-30%
0
" 20% _
t 0.
10%
0%-
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Vehicles per Household Figure F-2. Household Vehicle Availability Limerick Generating Station F-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Commuters Figure F-3 presents the distribution of the number of commuters in each household.
Commuters are defined as household members who travel to work or college on a daily basis.
The data shows an average of 1.05 commuters in each household in the EPZ, and 60% of households have at least one commuter.
Commuters 45%
40%
= 35%
30%
o 25%
0- 20%
S15%
25%
- 0. S10%
5 0%
0 1 2 3 4 Commuters per Household Figure F-3. Commuters in Households in the EPZ Limerick Generating Station F-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
F.2.2 Evacuation Response Questions were asked to gauge the population's response to an emergency. These are now discussed:
"How many vehicles would your household take if an evacuation were ordered when all household members were at home??" The response is shown in Figure F-4. On average, evacuating households would use 1.21 vehicles.
Evacuating Vehicles Per Household 90%
80%
0 70%
60%
0 50%
0 40%
30%
20%
10%
0% 4 I 2 2 3 4 Vehicles Figure F-4. Number of Vehicles Used for Evacuation Limerick Generating Station F-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
"ifan evacuationnotice were given while [the primary commuter] was at work, do you think they would most likely..." Of the survey participants who responded, 38 percent indicated they would evacuate from work, 43 percent said they would return home first and then evacuate, and 19 percent indicated that they would stay outside the evacuation zone where they work.
Commuter Evacuation Response 45%
40%
- 35%
w30%
,IA o 25%
20%
15%
a-S10%
5%
0% 1 Evacuate from Work Return Home Stay outside Evacuation Zone Figure F-5. Commuter Evacuation Response Limerick Generating Station F-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
F.2.3 Time Distribution Results The survey asked several questions about the amount of time it takes to perform certain pre-evacuation activities. These activities involve actions taken by residents during the course of their day-to-day lives. Thus, the answers fall within the realm of the responder's experience.
The mobilization distributions provided below are the result of having applied the analysis described in Section 5.4.1 on the component activities of the mobilization.
"How long do you think it would take [the primary commuter] to get prepared and actually leave work?" Figure F-6 presents the cumulative distribution; in all cases, the activity is completed within 75 minutes. Ninety-two percent can leave within 30 minutes.
Time to Prepare to Leave Work 100%
80%
E E 60%
0 0
40%
20%
0%
0 15 30 45 60 75 Preparation Time (min)
Figure F-6. Time Required to Prepare to Leave Work Limerick Generating Station F-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
"About how long does it take [the primary commuter] to get from work to home?" Figure F-7 presents the work to home travel time for the EPZ. Approximately 74 percent of commuters can arrive home within about 30 minutes of leaving work; all within 75 minutes.
Work to Home Travel 100%
'A
" 80%
E 60%
40%
C 20%
0%
0 15 30 45 60 75 Travel Time (min)
Figure F-7. Work to Home Travel Time Limerick Generating Station F-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
"If an evacuation were ordered when all household members were at home (forexample, at night or on a weekend), approximatelyhow long would it take your household to prepare to depart?Please assume that you are advised to plan to be away from your home for 3 days."
Figure F-8 presents the time required to prepare for leaving on an evacuation trip. In many ways this activity mimics a family's preparation for a short holiday or weekend away from home. Hence, the responses represent the experience of the responder in performing similar activities. About 50 percent of households can be ready to leave home within 30 minutes; the remaining households require up to an additional 90 minutes.
Preparation Time with Everyone Home 100%
"9 80%
0I 60%
0 o 40%
20%
0% .
0 30 60 90 120 Preparation Time (min)
Figure F-8. Time to Prepare Home for Evacuation The survey conducted in support of this study did not ask residents how long it would take them to remove snow from their driveway if there were snow on the ground when an evacuation was ordered. As discussed in Section 5.3, the response to the snow removal question in a survey conducted in 2008 in support of ETE development for the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES) is adapted for this study. SSES is also in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, only 65 miles north-northwest of LGS. It is assumed that snowfall and snow removal times are similar in both EPZs.
"How long would it take you to clear 6 to 8 inches of snow from your driveway?" During adverse, snowy weather conditions, an additional activity must be performed before residents can depart on the evacuation trip. Although snow scenarios assume that the roads and highways have been plowed and are passable (albeit at lower speeds and capacities), it may be necessary to clear a private driveway prior to leaving the home so that the vehicle can access the street. Figure F-9 presents the time distribution for removing 6 to 8 inches of snow from a driveway. The time distribution for clearing the driveway has a long tail; about 90 percent of driveways are passable within 60 minutes. The last driveway is cleared two hours and 15 Limerick Generating Station F-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
minutes after the start of this activity. Forty percent of respondents answered that they would need less than 15 minutes to render the driveway passable (the first data point plotted is at 15 minutes). This group includes those who would not clear the snow at all but would drive through the snow on the driveway to access the roadway and begin their evacuation trip.
Time to Remove Snow from Driveway 100%
80%
"n 0
60%
0
= 40%
0 20%
0%
0 30 60 90 120 150 Time (min)
Figure F-9. Time to Clear Driveway of 6"-8" of Snow F.3 Conclusions The telephone survey provides valuable, relevant data associated with the EPZ population, which have been used to quantify demographics specific to the EPZ, and "mobilization time" which can influence evacuation time estimates.
Limerick Generating Station F-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
ATTACHMENT A Telephone Survey Instrument Limerick Generating Station F-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Telephone Survey Instrument Exelon Survey Final v6 - August 23, 2011 INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is and I am callingfrom MDC Research, a public opinionfirm. We are conducting a briefsurvey to gather informationfrom households in your area about emergency responseplanning, and we'd like to include your opinions. This survey is being conducted on behalf of the (insertfacility name) NuclearFacility, and will take approximately 5 minutes to complete. We are not trying to sell you anything. The informationgatheredfrom this survey will help local agencies more effectively provide community assistanceshould an emergency situation arise.
Can I please speak with an adult member of the household?
SCREENER S 1. What is the zip code of your primary residence? This is the home where you live the majority of the time. DO NOT READ ZIP CODE LIST List of appropriate zip codes will be displayed here 99999 Location outside the EPZ - THANK & TERMINATE S2. Which of the following categories best describes your age?
11 Under 18 yrs of age - ASK FOR REFERRAL or THANK & TERMINATE 12 18 to 24 13 25 to 34 14 35 to 44 15 45 to 54 16 55 to 64 17 65 to 74 18 75 or older 98 (DO NOT READ) Refused QUESTIONNAIRE QI How many people currently reside in your household?
Record: # of residents 98 (DO NOT READ) Refused - THANK & TERMINATE Q2 How many motor vehicles are normally based at your home?
Record: # of vehicles 997 None - SKIP TO Q14 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Limerick Generating Station F-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Q3 How many members of your household are over the age of 16?
Record: # of residents 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q4 How many members of your household are licensed drivers?
Record: # of drivers 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q5 How many of the adults in your household work outside the home?
Record D Skip to Q6A 997 None - Continue to Q5A 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused If refused, explain; The nature of this project is to estimate traffic volumes and flow in the event of an emergency evacuation, so this data is necessary in order for us to continue with the survey.
If still refused - THANK & TERMINATE Q5A (ONLY ASK IF Q5=997) Which of the following best describes the non-working adults in your household? MULTIPLE MENTION - IP NOTE: No more mentions than Q3 mentions.
11 Currently unemployed/actively looking for work 12 Retired 13 On Disability or leave of absence 14 Student/continuing education 15 Homemaker 99 Other - please specify SKIP TO Q11 Repeat the following Q6A-F sequence for each working adult cited in Q5 For each of the working adults you just referenced, I'd like to ask a few questions related to what their likely actions would be in the case of an emergency evacuation. I understand that I will be asking you to speculate on what other members of the household may do in this situation, but your best guesses are just fine for our purposes.
Q6A Who is the first working adult in the household that you are thinking about? What is their relationship to you?
1 Self 2 Spouse or significant other 3 Parent of child 4 Other relative or in-law 5 Roommate 6 Boarder 7 Other Limerick Generating Station F-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Q6B Which of the following best describes this person's usual work schedule?
1 Monday - Friday, 8:00am to 5:00pm 2 Swing Shift 3 Graveyard 4 Evenings and weekends 5 Rotating shifts 6 Other or irregular schedule 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q6C Does this person generally use a personal vehicle to commute back and forth to work?
1 Yes 2 No 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q6D If an evacuation notice were given while this person was at work, do you think they would most likely...
1 Evacuate directly from work 2 Come home first and then evacuate, or 3 Stay outside the evacuation zone where they work D Skip to Q7 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q6E How long do you think it would take this person to get prepared and actually leave work?
(Read list if necessary) 1 Less than 15 minutes 2 15 to 30 minutes 3 30 to 45 minutes 4 45 to 60 minutes 5 More than 60 minutes 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know If response at 6D is 1, skip from here to Q7 Q6F About how long does it take this household member to get from work to home?
(Read list if necessary) 1 Less than 15 minutes 2 15 to 30 minutes 3 30 to 45 minutes 4 45 to 60 minutes 5 More than 60 minutes 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q7A-F Repeat Q6 sequence for worker #2 Q8A-F Repeat Q6 sequence for worker #3 Q9A-F Repeat Q6 sequence for worker #4 Limerick Generating Station F-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Q 10 And once everyone who is coming home from work has arrived, how long would it take to prepare and depart from home, taking into consideration whether or not someone else is usually home who may be starting these preparation while they are travelling?
1 Less than 15 minutes 2 15 to 30 minutes 3 30 to 45 minutes 4 45 to 60 minutes 5 More than 60 minutes 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q I1Are any of the licensed drivers in your household restricted to daytime driving only?
1 Yes 2 No 9 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q 12 If an evacuation were ordered when all household members were at home (for example, at night or on a weekend), approximately how long would it take your household to prepare to depart? Please assume that you are advised to plan to be away from your home for 3 days. Would you say that it would take... READ LIST 1 Less than 20 minutes to depart 2 20 to 40 minutes to depart 3 40 to 60 minutes to depart 4 60 to 90 minutes to depart; or 5 More than 90 minutes to depart Q 13 How many vehicles would your household take if an evacuation were ordered when all household members were at home?
Record: # of vehicles 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q 14 Are any members of your household seasonal residents? And by seasonal we mean any people who do not reside in your home the majority of the year.
1 Yes 2 No - SKIP TO Q15 9 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q 14A (ASK IF Q 14= 1) How many of your <insert Q I response> household members are seasonal?
Record: # of seasonal household members 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q14B (ASK IF Q14=1) What seasons do they live in another location away from your home?
READ LIST - Multiple Mention 1 Spring 2 Summer 3 Fall Limerick Generating Station F-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
4 Winter Q 15 Would any member of your household require a specialized vehicle, such as a wheelchair, van or ambulance, to evacuate from your home in case of an emergency?
1 Yes 2 No 9 (DO NOT READ) Refused This is all the questions we have for you today/tonight. Thank you for participating in this survey. Your responses will help us to make an accurate prediction of traffic conditions during an emergency situation. If you have any questions about this survey, please feel free to contact
<insert contact name, job title, and phone number/email>.
Limerick Generating Station F-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
APPENDIX G Traffic Management Plan
G. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN NUREG/CR-7002 indicates that the existing TCPs and ACPs identified by the offsite agencies should be used in the evacuation simulation modeling. The traffic and access control plans for the EPZ were provided by each county and by the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency.
These plans were reviewed and the TCPs and ACPs were modeled accordingly.
G.1 Traffic Control Points As discussed in Section 9, traffic control points at intersections (which are controlled) are modeled as actuated signals. If an intersection has a pre-timed signal, stop, or yield control, and the intersection is identified as a traffic control point, the control type was changed to an actuated signal in the DYNEV II system. Table K-2 provides the control type and node number for those nodes which are controlled. If the existing control was changed due to the point being a TCP, the control type is indicated as "Traffic Control Point" in Table K-2.
G.2 Access Control Points It is assumed that ACPs will be established within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> of the advisory to evacuate to discourage through travelers from using major through routes which traverse the EPZ. As discussed in Section 3.6, external traffic was considered on the major routes which traverse the study area 476, Route 309, 1-76, 1-276, US 202, US 30 and US 422 - in this analysis. The generation of the external trips ceases at 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> after the advisory to evacuate in the simulation due to the ACPs.
Figure G-1 maps the TCPs and ACPs identified in the county and state emergency plans. These TCPs and ACPS are concentrated on major evacuation routes and on roadways giving access to the EPZ. Theses TCPs and ACPs would be manned during evacuation by traffic guides who would direct evacuees in the proper direction away from the plant and facilitate the flow of traffic through the intersections.
Detailed descriptions of each of the TCPs and ACPs and the actions to be taken by traffic guides at these intersections are provided in the county and state plans. These actions were modeled explicitly in the DYNEV II system. For additional information, refer to the county and state plans.
As discussed in Section 9, this study did not identify any additional intersections as TCPs or ACPs. The existing county and state traffic management plans are comprehensive.
Limerick Generating Station G-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure G-1. Traffic and Access Control Points for the Limerick Generating Station Limerick Generating Station G-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure G-2. Traffic and Access Control Points - Berks County Limerick Generating Station G-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Traffic,+Cont+rol Ponts. ,-.,
Buk ounty, .... . +. ' - +'- 0 5
_.+... _, *.,+... +* ,+. . A. _+_ ,+...*,
+
'.)"---:?*
+-"
~~
. ++
~ ~
- .+'
~ rI.- ..+
,rdar. k .-;"-'56.. ".... 'YL ' . '*..
ppe+.- > \ . .- ,? ++ . * ..
- Sa.l.ford',
L.;;*<;;d C .;..r. ... ,-. ..
n" Ale , r*)y..,"-:.. " . <-.. . . , . " . - +. " ,,.+
Traffic ControlFiur Points-Bcsout G3 Limerick Generating Station G-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure G-4. Traffic Control Points - Chester County Limerick Generating Station G-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure G-5. Traffic Control Points -Lehigh County Limerick Generating Station G-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure G-6. Traffic and Access Control Points - Montgomery County Limerick Generating Station G-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
APPENDIX H Evacuation Regions
H. EVACUATION REGIONS This appendix presents the evacuation percentages for each Evacuation Region (Table H-1 through Table H-3) and maps of all Evacuation Regions. The percentages presented in Table H-1 through Table H-3 are based on the methodology discussed in assumption 5 of Section 2.2 and shown in Figure 2-1.
Note the baseline ETE study assumes 20 percent of households will not comply with the shelter advisory, as per Section 2.5.2 of NUREG/CR-7002.
Limerick Generating Station H-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Table H-1. Percent of Sub-area Population Evacuating for Each Region (Regions RO1-R16) 2-Mile 5-Mile Full Region
Description:
Ring Ring EPZ Evacuate 2-Mile Radius and Downwind to 5 Miles Region Number: I R01 I R02 I R03 I R04 ROS IN/A R06 1R07 ROB JR091 RIO R111 R12 R131 R14 JR15 R16 Wind Direction Toward: I N/A I N I IF I I q I IWI I~NNW SUB-AREA I Amity 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 1 20% 20% 1 20% 20% 1 20% 20% 1 20% 20%
Boyertown 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Charlestown 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Colebrookdale 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Collegeville 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Douglass (Berks) 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Douglass (Montgomery) 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Earl 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
East Coventry 2 m 2% % 0 0 0 2 2 m m East Nantmeal 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
East Pikeland 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
East Vincent 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
"n 0/'_ ' N/
Green Lane 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Limerick 20% D Lower Frederick 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Lower Pottsgrove CE Lower Providence 20% 20% 20% 20% " 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Lower Salford 20% 20% 20% 20% o 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
no/. )noA Marlborough 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
New Hanover 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
North Coventry 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Perkiomen 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Phoenixville 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Pottstown 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Royersford 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Schuylkill 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
20% 20%
20% 20%
20% 20%
20% 20%
20% 20%
20% 20%
20% 20%
20% 20%
20% 20%
20% 20%
20%
Schwenksville 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Skippack 20% 20% 20% 20% 220% 20% 0% 2020% 20% 0% 20 0 o0 0%
South Coventry Spring City 20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20% W m m 20% 20% 20% 120% 120% 20% 20%
Trappe 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 120% 20% 20% 20% 20% 120% 120% 20% 20%
Union 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 1 20% 20% 20% 1 20% 1 20% 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20%
Limerick Generating Station H-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Evacuate 2-Mile Radius and Downwind to 5 Miles N/A R06 R07 IROB R09 R1O R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 Et.iu C CC Icc CCC IC CCIAI CIAI IAICIAI IAI %AItdIAI kIAI hIMIRIA Upper Frederick ZU70 LOUo LU~ro ZU'b ZUYo LUYo ZU70 ZU%'o UAO /U%' ZU'7 LU% ZU% ZUb Upper Pottsgrove 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Upper Providence 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
- nJ upper Saffora ZU70o zUIo 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Upper Uwchlan 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Uwchlan 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Warwick 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Washington 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
West Pikeland 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
West Pottsgrove 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Wat X/inront )n )no/ I n /O ~no0 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Limerick Generating Station H-3 H-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Table H-2. Percent of Sub-area Population Evacuating for Each Region (Regions R17-R32)
Region
Description:
[ Evacuate 5-Mile Radius and Downwind to the EPZ Boundary Region Number: R17 R18 R19 R20 R21 R22 R23 R24 R25 R26 R27 R28 R29 R30 R31 R32 IAt;....A _ - I* Pdn, ki&iE 1 E C E CEic ECE cc CCC C CCIAI CIAI IAICIAI IAI ItAIIIl RltAO JM-1 VVIll .ItlflJ,, % I W LFWOEL. 1a SUB-AREA Amity Boyertown Charlestown 1 20% 1 20% I 20%
I 20%
I 20%
I 20%
20% 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 Colebrookdale Collegeville Douglass (Berks)
Douglass (Montgomery)
Earl East Coventry East Nantmeal East Pikeland East Vincent Green Lane Limerick Lower Frederick Lower Pottsgrove Lower Providence Lower Salford Marlborough New Hanover North Coventry Perkiomen Y. 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Phoenixville Y. 20% I 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Pottstown Royersford Schuvlkill 20% 20% 20% 120% 20% 20% 1 20% 1 Schwenksville 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% I Skippack Io- ) I -) o- I -) o/ I -)o/. I -) o- I -) o. I -) . I South Coventry Spring City Trappe LW4b Iu iu~LW' ZUub I ZU~o I1 U7 I7 L0 1 ub I zWb Union Limerick Generating Station H-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Region
Description:
I Evacuate 5-Mile Radius and Downwind to the EPZ Boundary Region Number: R17 R18 R19 R20 R21 R22 R23 R24 R25 R26 R27 R28 R29 R30 R31 R32 Wind Direction Toward: N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW SUB-AREA Upper Frederick Upper Pottsgrove Upper Providence Upper Salford I
Upper Uwchlan Uwchlan 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Warwick 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Washington 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
West Pikeland 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
West Pottsgrove 100% 1 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 1 West Vincent 20% 1 20% J 20% L 20% J 20% 120% [ 20%
Sub-area not within Plume, but Evacuates because it is surrounded by other Sub-areas which are Evacuating Limerick Generating Station H-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Table H-3. Percent of Sub-area Population Evacuating for Each Region (Regions R33-R46)
Region
Description:
Staged Evacuation Mile Radius Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles Region Number: R33 R34 R35 N/A IR36 R37I R38 IR39 R40 R41 R42 R43[ R44 IR45 R46 Wind Direction Toward: 5-Mile Ring N NNE, NE I ENE E ESE SE, SSE S SSWI SW WSWI W WNWI NW NNW SUB-AREA Amity 20% 20% 20% 20% 1 20% 20% 20% 120% 120% 120% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Boyertown 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Charlestown 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Colebrookdale 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Collegeville 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Douglass (Berks) 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Douglass (Montgomery) 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Earl 20% 20% 20% 20%1 20% 20%
20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
20%
East Coventry East Nantmeal 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
East Pikeland 20% 20% 20% 20i 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
(D East Vincent 2 20%
Green Lane 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
0 Limerick I-.
Lower Frederick 20% 20% 20%
20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Lower Pottsgrove Lower Providence 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Lower Salford 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Marlborough 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20 2% 2%
New Hanover 2% 2%
North Coventry 20% 20%
220% ý 0% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 120%
Perkiomen 20% 20% 20%
Phoenixville 20% 20% 1 20% 20% 20% 1 20% 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 20% 120%
Pottstown 20% 20% 120% j 20% j20% j20% j 20% j20%
Royersford -E20% I 20%
L_________ i 20%
___________ I~ I~ E ~
20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20%
__________ I I __________ I 1 20% 1 20%
I ___________ ___________
Limerick Generating Station H-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Region
Description:
Staged Evacuation Mile Radius Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles Region Number: R33 R34 R35 IN/A IR36 IR37 R38 IR39 IR40 IR41 IR42 R43I R44 R45 R46 Wind Direction Toward: S-Mile Ring N NNE, NE ENE E ESE I SE, SSE S SSWI SW IWSW W IWNWI NW INNW SUB-AREA Schuvlkill 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 1 20% 20% 1 20% 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20%
Schwenksville 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Skippack 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
South Coventry 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Spring City 20% 20% 205%/ 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Trappe 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Union 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Upper Frederick 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Upper Pottsgrove 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Upper Providence 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Upper Salford 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Upper Uwchlan 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Uwchlan 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Warwick 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Washington 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
West Pikeland 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
West Pottsgrove 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
West Vincent 20% 20% 20% 20% 120% 20% 120% 120% 120% 120% 120% 120% 120% 120%
Limerick Generating Station H-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
I Figure H-1. Region R01 Limerick Generating Station H-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-2. Region R02 Limerick Generating Station H-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-3. Region R03 Limerick Generating Station H-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-4. Region R04 Limerick Generating Station H-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-5. Region R05 Limerick Generating Station H-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-6. Region R06 Limerick Generating Station H-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
I Figure H-7. Region R07 Limerick Generating Station H-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
I Figure H-8. Region R08 Limerick Generating Station H-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-9. Region R09 Limerick Generating Station H-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-1O. Region RIO Limerick Generating Station H-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-11. Region Rll Limerick Generating Station H-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-12. Region R12 Limerick Generating Station H-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-13. Region R13 Limerick Generating Station H-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-14. Region R14 Limerick Generating Station H-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-15. Region R15 Limerick Generating Station H-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-16. Region R16 Limerick Generating Station H-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-17. Region R17 Limerick Generating Station H-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0
Figure H-18. Region R18 Limerick Generating Station H-25 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 0