|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML22125A1502022-05-0303 May 2022
Comment (010) from the Californians for Green Nuclear Power, Inc. on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning
ML22138A1562022-04-29029 April 2022
Extension Request from Congresswoman Salud Carbajal on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning
ML18157A3072018-06-0101 June 2018
Comment (035) of Anonymous Individual on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14007A0082013-12-21021 December 2013
Comment (00856) of Julie Gibson on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14008A1702013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00820) of Jeannette Watson on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13360A1022013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00661) of Carol Georgi on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13360A1142013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00666) of Lisa Brown on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13360A1132013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00665) of Peter Adam on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14002A0212013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00816) of Nancy Foley of PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13360A1212013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00669) of Simone Malboeuf on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13357A8062013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00592) of Vicki Leon on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13354A0222013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00543) of Ray Johnson on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13354A0042013-12-18018 December 2013
Comment (00526) of Evelyn Justesen on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13354A0012013-12-18018 December 2013
Comment (00523) of Michelle Kaul on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14014A0962013-12-15015 December 2013
Comment (00912) of Marina Bethlenfalvay on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13351A1372013-12-14014 December 2013
Comment (00418) of Frank Zika on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13346A1892013-12-11011 December 2013
Comment (00361) of Walt French on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13345B2632013-12-0909 December 2013
Comment (00353) of Calvin Wilvert on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13346A2142013-12-0404 December 2013
Comment (00366) of Roger Emmons on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13339A1692013-12-0202 December 2013
Comment (00322) of Deborah Heald on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13346A1972013-12-0101 December 2013
Comment (00362) of Laura, Philip & Brandon Mordaunt on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13346A1862013-12-0101 December 2013
Comment (00360) of Randall Tognazzini on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13346A2022013-11-26026 November 2013
Comment (00364) of Jeffrey Buckingham on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336A7302013-11-24024 November 2013
Comment (00285)of Sally Hayati on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336A7322013-11-24024 November 2013
Comment (00286) of Lillian Light on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336A7272013-11-22022 November 2013
Comment (00282) of Ben Terra on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336A7282013-11-22022 November 2013
Comment (00283) of Diane Smith on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336A7262013-11-21021 November 2013
Comment (00281) of Zelma Fishman on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13346A2262013-11-21021 November 2013
Comment (00368) of Susan Atlee on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336A5702013-11-20020 November 2013
Comment (00275) of Gail Comer on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336A5652013-11-20020 November 2013
Comment (00272) of Elizabeth Curren on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13329A6802013-11-20020 November 2013
Comment (00237) of Bill Denneen on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
NRC-2011-0299, Comment (14) of James Becker on Draft Regulatory Basis Document to Support Potential Amendment to Regulations Concerning Nuclear Power Plant Licensees' Station Blackout Mitigatin Strategies (10 CFR Parts 50 and 52), (NRC-2011-0299)2013-06-24024 June 2013
Comment (14) of James Becker on Draft Regulatory Basis Document to Support Potential Amendment to Regulations Concerning Nuclear Power Plant Licensees' Station Blackout Mitigatin Strategies (10 CFR Parts 50 and 52), (NRC-2011-0299)
ML12200A3372012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (191) of Richard Kranzdorf Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12200A2612012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (182) of Nancy Watts Supporting PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12146A1912012-05-20020 May 2012
Comment (134) of Richard Kranzdorf on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML1125211062011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 ESBWR Design Certification Amendment
NRC-2010-0135, Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment2011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment
ML1125210392011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment
ML1008901302010-03-29029 March 2010
Comment (11) of Betty Winholtz, on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-93, Regarding NRC Revise Its Regulations Based on Data from multi-rod (Assembly) Severe Fuel Damage Experiments
ML1008901272010-03-26026 March 2010
Comment (9) of Debbie Highfill on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-93 Regarding NRC Revise Its Regulations Based on Data from multi-rod (Assembly) Severe Fuel Damage Experiments
ML1008901242010-03-25025 March 2010
Comment (6) of Jerry Martin on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-93 Regarding NRC Revise Its Regulations Based on Data from multi-rod (Assembly) Severe Fuel Damage Experiments
ML0926008852009-09-11011 September 2009
Letter of Rep. Lois Capps Requesting for 90 Days Extension of the Comment Period for PR-51 Revisions to Environmental Review for Renewal of Nuclear Power Plant Operating License to Provide for an Additional Meeting in San Luis Obispo
ML0736105582007-12-17017 December 2007
Comment (5) of T. Moser on Behalf of Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing (Stars), Supporting Proposed Rules Pr 50, Alternate Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events.
ML0717106392007-06-19019 June 2007
Comment (14) Submitted by Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing (Stars), T. Moser, on Proposed Rules Pr 50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements
ML0702604112007-01-17017 January 2007
Comment (15) Submitted by Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing (Stars), D. Hooper on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re to Amend 10 CFR Part 51
ML0700400592007-01-0202 January 2007
Comment (7) Submitted by San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, Jane Swanson, on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10, to Amend 10 CFR Part 51
ML0602601792006-01-24024 January 2006
Comment (67) Submitted by Kim Dunn on Proposed Rule PR-73 Regarding Design Basis Threat
ML0602500772006-01-23023 January 2006
Comment (52) Submitted by Bill Denneen on Proposed Rule PR-73 Regarding Design Basis Threat
ML0602406062006-01-22022 January 2006
Comment (41) Submitted by James B. Thomas on Proposed Rule PR-73 Regarding Design Basis Threat
2022-05-03
[Table view] |
Text
1 Rulemaking1CEm Resource From: RulemakingComments Resource Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:32 AM To: Rulemaking1CEm Resource
Subject:
FW: Diablo Canyon Power Plant DOCKETED BY USNRC-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 11/22/13 TITLE: Waste Confidence-Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00282
From: Ben Terra [mailto:fishinfreakben@gmail.com
] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 12:44 AM To: RulemakingComments Resource
Subject:
Diablo Canyon Power Plant Greetings, DCPP is located on one a piece of coastline that has very high potential for serious seismic activity. I have fished the coast commercially, near-shore, for 17 years from Point Purisima To Point Ano Nuevo. It is obvious from a simple view from the water, that DCPP is located in a place where violent seismic activity has occurred in the past. The only other places on th e entire stretch of coast I have descri bed that have anything even close to the type of violent seismically formed rock structur es as that surrounding DCPP, are that of Point Lobos Reserve area, and some of the coastline along Big Sur. DCPP is a nightmare waiting to happen. San Luis Obispo was named the "happiest place on earth," so long as you don't consider the fact that Diablo Canyon Power Plant is sitting just over the hills, with pools full of spent fuel rods, which were never supposed to be stored on site. Every one who lives in SLO county is gambling that the big earthquake, that is overdue, is not going to take place while we are still residing in this county. We all try to pretend that it isn't going to happen. The fact is, that if the quake does happen, there will be a disaster similar to that of Fukushima, and San Luis County will instantly become one of the most nightmarish places on earth. Please do the job that you are paid to do, and see to it that DCPP is shut down.
Ben Terra
Hearing Identifier: Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number: 297 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D001386AB8BC16)
Subject:
FW: Diablo Canyon Power Plant Sent Date: 12/2/2013 8:32:03 AM Received Date: 12/2/2013 8:32:04 AM From: RulemakingComments Resource Created By: RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients: "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None
Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1839 12/2/2013 8:32:04 AM
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
