ML13326A524
| ML13326A524 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1978 |
| From: | Ziemann D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | James Drake Southern California Edison Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13326A525 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7812140292 | |
| Download: ML13326A524 (6) | |
Text
NOV 3 0 1978 Docket No. 50-206 Southern California Edison Company ATTN: Mr. James H. Drake Vice President 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Gentlemen:
The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 39 to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13 for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 1. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications in response to your request dated July 17, 1978 (Proposed Change No. 72).
The amendment changes certain provisions in Sections 6 and 5 (Adminis trative Controls) of Appendices A and B, respectively, to reflect the new corporate and station organizational structure, and to increase the Onsite Review Committee membership.
The Facility Organization now reports to the new position of Plant Manager (formerly the Station Superintendent). The Superintendent is now in the chain of command between the Plant Manager and station personnel. The positions of Supervising Engineer and Security Supervisor have been added, both reporting directly to the Plant Manager. The position of Training Supervisor has also been added, reporting directly to the Superintendent. The Plant Manager now reports to the new position of Manager, Nuclear Generation in the Offsite Organization. Previously, he reported to the Supervisor of Steam Operations and Maintenance.
The Onsite Review Committee membership was increased from seven to nine, consistent with the new positions in the Onsite Organization and in conformance with the corresponding requirements in the Westinghouse Plant Standard Technical Specifications. We have concluded that these changes are administrative in nature, do not reduce the effectiveness for the management or safe operation of San Onofre, Unit 1, and are therefore acceptable.
781214C Z_
OFFICE SURNAME*
-0.
......*1.......
DATERM NRC FORM 318 (9.76) NRCH 0240 u
U~S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICEs 1976 - 626.624
Southern California Edison Company NOV 301978 We have evaluated the potential for environmental impact of plant operation in accordance with the enclosed amendment. The amendment applies to the organizational structure and therefore does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level, and will not result in any significant environmental impact. Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendment involves an action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental impact and pursuant to 10 CFR §51.5(d)(4) that an environmental impact statement, or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment,
. Since the amendment applies to the organizational structure, it does not involve significant new safety information of a type not considered by a previous Commission safety review of the facility. It does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident, does not involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, and therefore does not involve a significant hazards consideration. We have also concluded that there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by this action.
A copy of the related Notice of Issuance is also enclosed.
Sincerely, Original Sign b
Dennis L..Ziemann Dennis L. Ziemann, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Operating Reactors
Enclosures:
BTTN
- 1. AendentNo.9 t DP-13 Docket (50-206)
BScharf (15)
Ec.Amendmnt No.39 to DPR-13t
- 2. Notice of Issuance Local PDRS n
cc w/enclosures:
ORB#2 RDG ACRS(16)
VStello Miles BGrimes DRoss HSmith RDiqgs ABurger TERA OELD OI&E(5)
Ruav an BJones(4)
OFFICE DOR B#2 DOR:ORB#2 OELDR:
RB#2 I...........-.
DURAMRH hsah iA.Burger_
04--DL-ieman HS h.JDaltzman NRC FORM 318 (9-76) NRCM 0240
- U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICEt 1976 -
626-624
Docket No. 50-206 Southern California Edison Company ATTN:
Mr. James H. Drake Vice President 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box-800 Rosemead, California 91770 Gentlemen:
The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment o. to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13 for th San 1ofr Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No.. 1. The amendment cdnsists f changes to the Technical Specifications in response o o request dated July 17, 1978 (Proposed Change No. 72).r The amendment changes certain provisi ns in Sections 6 and 5 (Administrative Controls) of Appendi es A and B, respectively, to reflect the new corporate ands tion organizational structure, and to increase the Onsite Review ommittee membership.
The Facility Organization now ports to the new position of Plant.
Manager (formerly the Station uperihtenden t).
The Superintendent is now in the chain of comman betweenth'
'ant Manager and station personnel.
The positions of, upervising 4igneer and Security Supervisor have been added both reporting directly to the Plant Manager.
The position of rafni ngSuprvisor has also been added, reporting directly to th Superitendent.
h Te Plan"t Manager now reports to the new posi ion of Manager, Nuclear Generation in the "Offsite Organization".
Previously, 'he reported to the Supervisor of Steam Operations d Maintenance.
The Onsite Review ommittee membership was increased from seven to nine, consistent ith the newpositions in the Onsite Organization and in conform ce with the corresponding requirements in the Westinghouse 4.ant Standard Technical Specifications. We have concluded thA these changes are administrative in nature, do not reduce-the ffectiveness for the management or safe operation of San Onofre, U1t 1, and are therefore acceptable.
OFFICE.
S R A E ).
f1240 U. 3. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE; 1976 - 626-624
X
.Southern California Edison Company - 2 We have evaluated the potential for environmental impact of plant operation in accordance with the enclosed amendment.
Th amendment applies to the.organizational struciure and therefore es not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an in rease in power level, and will not result in any significant envir mental impact.
Having made this determination, we have further c cluded that the amendment involves an action which is insignific t from the stand point of environmental impact and pursuant'to 1 CFR 551.5(d)(4) that an environmental impact statement, negative d claration or environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in-co ection with the issuance of this amendment.
Since the amendment applies to the orga zational structure, it does not involve significant new sa etyjn rmtion of a type not considered by a previous Commission safety re 6f the facility. It does not involve a significant increase in t probability or an accident, does not involve a.significant decrea-s in a safety margin, and therefore does not involve a significant h'zards c6nsideration. -We have also concluded that there is reason le ssurvanceithat the health and safety of the public will not e evidrif e6id by this action.
A copy of the related Notice of Issuance is also enclosed.
Sincerely, Dennis L. Ziemann, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Operating Reactor'
Enclosures:
DISTRIBUTION
- 1. Amendment No.
to DPR-13 Docket(50-206) DEisenhut
- 2. Notice NRC-PDR ACRS(16)
LOCAL PDR CMiles cc w/encl:
ORB#2 Reading DRoss See next page VSteTlo RDiggs BKGrimes JRBuchanan HSmith TERA FBurger OELD OI&E(5)
BJones(4)
BScharf(15)
JSaltzman own DOR:0RB#2 OELD DOR:0RB#2 De 086 2 SUNAE ABurger:1bDLemn HST DATE*
10/23/78 O/
/78 0/
/78 IP/ (..
NRC FORM 318 (9-76) NRCM 0240 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1970 -
626.624
74'~
B ADM ENTC iS FICA :
L_'!
e Ce Cir~
I
~
~
~
n I3ac D'
~
TV.-Jl~;iW.J
- i.
c e No, I
~
CC2 E,
Part S/
Cn' S e Ia s -1f cei a.t C as
- 2. This request s i
~~ cor-nc ;asi C
~
~~. <
ns Cli iutf 39 11'~
o
~
170'~~~
2fro' Z
t 1s n
2, T-
- s.
r
(,u s
iS nc)r e
.i' 1e it:S C (as s
flie CIISi'
- t.
J!
T III~
i sC.
reqes 01i S
ICI IS1SO c
a h) w s fi 'I d by a Gove,-rr~nc' ot il I' --
c k, f U
( ) is for a Class
( con on
V,
I I 11.
aII C.r: n e w i ch rs u 1 t S fro I a wr itcOO ri cu, d t: ev dhc; f r te d-. t (catm C n !1 4~'
Ic.!> 1 o
c i:n e o-t r hniC
- c. c a e
Y (ic SjI 11 FCOCO (2 anIId is being fl' s 5s
-j f th o COI il 1 MC 2 v II.
.04.
s.t 6/v c Lie s c n -1~ > e ~ -
- o
Southern California Edison Company November 30, 1978 cc Rollin E. Woodbury, Vice President Director, Technical Assessment and General Counsel Division Southern California Edison Company Office of Radiation Programs Post Office Box 800 (AW-459)
Rosemead, California 91770 US EPA Crystal Mall #2 David R. Pigott Arlington, Virginia 20460 Samuel B. Casey Chickering & Gregory U. S. Environmental Protection Three Embarcadero*Center Agency Twenty-Third Floor Region IX Office San Francisco, California 94111 ATTN: EIS COORDINATOR 215 Freemont Street David W. Gilman San Francisco, California 94111 Robert G. Lacey San Diego Gas & Electric Company U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comissic Post Office Box 1831 ATTN:
Robert J. Pate San Diego, California 92112 Post Office Box 4167 San Clemente, California 92672 Mission Viejo Branch Library 24851 Chrisanta Drive Mission Viejo, California 92676 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92676 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego San Diego, California 92101
- California Department of Health ATTN:
Chief, Environmental Radiation Control Unit
,Radiologic Health Section 714 P Street, Room 498 Sacramento, California 95814
- w/copy of incoming dated 7/17/78