ML13323A992
| ML13323A992 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1985 |
| From: | Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Baskin K SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13323A993 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8508200658 | |
| Download: ML13323A992 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000206/1985014
Text
JUL 311985
Docket Nos.
50-206, 50-361, 50-362
Southern California Edison Company
P. 0. Box 800
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
Rosemead, California 92770
Attention:
Mr; Kenneth P."Baskin, Vice President
Nuclear Engineering Safety and Licensing
Gentlemen:
This refers to. the routine inspection conducted by Messrs. F. R. Huey, J. P.
Stewart', A. D'Angelo,:and J.' ETatumof-this office during the period of
March 23 :throUgh May 21, 1985of Iactivit.iesauthorized by NRC License Nos.
DPR-13, NPF-10 and NPF-15 and ,t6_tfe, discussion of our findings held by the
inspectors with Mr. H..B. Ray'and other members. of the Southern California.
Edison staff-at the conclsipn f, the
spection.
Areas exdmi'ned during th.is inspection are described in the enclosed inspection
report., Within these areas,'the inspection consisted of selective
examinatips,0f procedures and representative records, interviews with
personnel ,and observation' by the inspectors.
Based on theresults.of this inspection, it appears that certain of your
activities were .not obnductIdin compliance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission
requirements. The specific deficiencies are described in the Notices of
Violation and Deviatio included as Appendices A and B to this letter.
Your response to the Appendix A and B notices.are to be submitted to the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission as requested in .the individual notices.
In addition to the is.sues-in Appendix A and B, the unresolved item in
paragraph 5 of this report merits your careful attention. ' It is our position
that the requirements of Specification 3.6.1.1, Primary Containment Integrity,
(as defined in.Specification 1.7) apply to the (MSIV's) which are listed in,
Technical Specification Table 3.6-1 as-containment isolation valves and form a
part of the primary containment boundary. It is our understanding that you' do
not fully agree with this position, and that you. also consider a containment
isolation valve (including an MSIV) which is closed but energized to be
operable in so far as containment isolation and integrity are concerned, and
in regards to Specification 3.7.1.5. We request that you state your position
on these issues in addition to the response requested by the enclosed notices,
so we may further evaluate this unresolved item.
8508200658 850731
ADOCK.050 0 0206
-2
--
JUL 3.1, 98 5
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of.this letter, the enclosures, and
your responses thereto will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
The responses directed/requested 'by this letter 'and the accompanying Notices
are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and
Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be.glad to
discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
D. F. Kirsch, Acting Director
Division of Reactor Safety
and Projects
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A, Notice of Violation
2.
Appendix B, Notice of Deviation
3.
Inspection Report:,
Nos. 50-206/85-14
50-361/85-13
50-362/85-12
cc w/enclosures:
D. J. Fogarty, Executive Vice President
H. B. 'Ray, Vice President (San Clemente)
H. E. Morgan, Station Manager (San Clemente)
State of California
bcc w/enclosures:
Mr. Martin
Resident Inspector
RSB/Document Control Desk (RIDS)
bcc w/o enclosures:
LFMB
Greg Cook
RV/dot
JO
K
HUJEY-. STEWART D'ANGELO TATUM . P.JOHNSON CHAEE A. JOHNSON KIRSCH
'
17 /W~85 7/30/ 86 , 7/3q85
)/5
9/85
8/~8
/5
1~~
"7
I.8
fa
o