ML13323A417

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Repts 50-361/80-19 & 50-362/81-12 on 811104-07.No Noncompliance Noted
ML13323A417
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  
Issue date: 01/09/1981
From: Spencer G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Papay L
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML13323A418 List:
References
NUDOCS 8102190093
Download: ML13323A417 (2)


See also: IR 05000361/1980019

Text

Ps RREG(

So

UNITED STATES

( ~,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION V

1990 N. CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD

SUITE 202, WALNUT CREEK PLAZA

  • A4A

WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596

January 9, 1981

Docket Nos. 50-361

36

Southern California Edison Company

P. 0. Box 800

2244 Walnut grove Avenue

Rosemead, California 91770

Attention: Dr. L. T. Papay, Vice President

Advanced Engineering

Gentlemen:

Subject:

NRC Inspection at San Onofre Units 2/3

This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. J. H. Eckhardt, D. F. Kirsch

and G. Hernandez of this office on November 4-7, 1980 of activities authorized

by NRC Construction Permit Nos. CPPR-97 and 98, and to the discussions of

their findings held with you and members of your staff on November 7, 1980.

Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection

report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations

of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and

observations by the inspectors.

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified within the

scope of this inspection.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed

inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this

report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, It is

necessary that you submit a written application to this office, within 20

days of the date of this letter, requesting that such information be withheld

from public disclosure. The application must include a full statement of

the reasons why it is claimed that the information is proprietary. The

application should be prepared so that any proprietary information Identified

$1021'900O

Southern California Edison Company

-2-

January 9, 1981

is contained in an enclosure to the application, since the application without

the enclosure will also be placed in the Public Document Room. If we do not

hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be

placed in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad

to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

G. S. Spencer, Chief

Reactor Construction and

Engineering Support Branch

Enclosure:

IE Inspection Report

Nos. 50-361/80-19

50-362/80-12

cc w/o enclosure:

R. Dietch, Vice President

Nuclear Engineering & Operations, SCE