ML13323A402

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Repts 50-361/80-09 & 50-362/80-06 on 800428-0501.No Noncompliance Noted
ML13323A402
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  
Issue date: 07/10/1980
From: Spencer G
NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement (IE Region V)
To: Papay L
Southern California Edison Co
Shared Package
ML13323A404 List:
References
NUDOCS 8009020258
Download: ML13323A402 (2)


See also: IR 05000361/1980009

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION V

1990 N. CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD

SUITE 202, WALNUT CREEK PLAZA

WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596

JUL 10 1980

Docket No. 50-361,(50)-362

Southern California Edison Company

P. 0. Box 800

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue

Rosemead, California

91770

Attention: Dr. L. T. Papay, Vice President

Advanced Engineering

Gentlemen:

Subject:

NRC Inspection of San Onofre Units 2 and 3

This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. J. H. Eckhardt and J. 0. Eln

of this office on April 28-May 1, 1980 of activities authorized by NRC Construction

Permit Nos. CPPR-97 and 98, and to the discussion of their findings held by

Mr. Eckhardt with Mr. P. A. Croy and other members of your staff at the conclusion

of the inspection.

Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection

report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations

of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and obser

vations by the inspector.

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified within the

scope of this inspection.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed

inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this

report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is

necessary that you submit a written application to this office, within (30)

days of the date of this letter, requesting that such information be withheld

from public disclosure. The application must include a full statement of the

reasons why it claimed that the information is proprietary. The application

should be prepared so that any proprietary information identified is contained

in an enclosure to the application, since the application without the enclosure

will also be placed in the Public Document Room. If we do not hear from you

in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the

Public Document Room.

Southern California Edison Company

-2-

JUL 10 u8

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad

to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

G. S. Spencer, Chief

Reactor Construction and

Engineering Support Branch

Enclosures:

A. Inspection Report

Nos. 50-361/80-09

50-362/80-06

cc w/o enclosure:

R. Dietch, Vice President

Nuclear Engineering & Operations, SCE