ML13310B207
| ML13310B207 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 02/07/1984 |
| From: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Baskin K Southern California Edison Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13310B209 | List: |
| References | |
| LSO5-84-02-019, LSO5-84-2-19, NUDOCS 8402090321 | |
| Download: ML13310B207 (2) | |
Text
February 7, 1984 Docket No. 50-206
- Boct9, LS05-84-02-019 NRC PDR Local PDR ORB #5 Reading Mr. K. Baskin, Vice President NSIC Nuclear Engineering DCrutchfield Licensing and Safety Department HSmith Southern California Edison Company WPaulson 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue OELD Post Office Box 800 ELJordan Rosemead, California 91770 JMTaylor ACRS (10)
Dear Mr. Baskin:
SEPB BDLiau
SUBJECT:
STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTION San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 1 The NRC staff has completed the review of the report "Steam Generator Inspection Program, Return to Power Report, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1, September, 1982", which was submitted by your letter dated September 21, 1982. Our safety evaluation is enclosed.
Based on our review, we find that the inspection results and related corrective actions and analyses are generally acceptable; however, as discussed in Section 2.5.1 of the enclosure, we find that you have not provided an adequate basis to increase the inspection interval from 6 to approximately 12 Equivalent Full Power (EFP) months. Accordingly, prior to our approving the resumption of power operation, we request that you provide a proposed license condition for our review and approval that would (1) require that the reactor be brought to a cold shutdown condition to perform an inspection of the steam generators within 6 EFP months from the previous inspection, (2) provide for the submittal of a proposed inspection program for review and approval by the Commission at least 45 days prior to the shutdown, and (3) require that Commission approval be obtained prior to resuming power operation following the inspection. As discussed with your staff, any additional justification that you may provide for extending this inspection interval will be evaluated by the NRC staff.
Sincerely, Jriolna s gned b en is.
rutch 4eld, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosure
(
40
)
See next page DLl 0
- 5 ELD DL DL
-A WPau son:jc BD iauJ Chandler DCrItchfield FMi lia 01 1 04/84
/
84 4//84
/ }/84 16/ /84
- 8402090321 840207 PDR ADOCK 05000206 G
_PDR
Mr. K. Baskin cc Charles R. Kocher, Assistant General Counsel James Beoletto, Esquire Southern California Edison Company Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 David R. Pigott Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 600 Montogmery Street San Francisco, California 94111 Harry B. Stoehr San Diego Gas & Electric Company P. 0. Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS c/o U.S. NRC P. 0. Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego San Diego, California 92101 California Department of Health ATTN:
Joseph 0. Ward, Chief Radiation Control Unit Radiological Health Section 714 P Street, Room 498 Sacramento, California 95814 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Office ATTN:
Regional Radiation Representative 215 Freemont Street San Francisco, California 94111 John B. Martin, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region V 1450 Maria Lane Walnut Creek, California 94596