ML13303B845
| ML13303B845 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1987 |
| From: | Rood H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Baskin K, Holcombe J San Diego Gas & Electric Co, Southern California Edison Co |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8706020230 | |
| Download: ML13303B845 (6) | |
Text
2 6 MAY 1981 Docket Nos.: 50-361 and 50-362 Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin Mr. James C. Holcombe Vice President Vice President - Power Supply Southern Carolina Edison Company San Diego Gas & Electric Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue 101 Ash Street Post Office Box 800 Post Office Box 1831 Rosemead, California 91770 San Diego, California 92112 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
POST-IMPLEMENTATION AUDIT OF SPDS This letter is to confirm our telephone agreement that SCE will support a Post-Implementation Audit of the San Onofre 2 and 3 Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS) to be conducted by the NRC staff on June 15-18, 1987. A proposed agenda for the audit is enclosed. Also enclosed is a request for additional information regarding the status of the San Onofre 2 and 3 SPDS.
We request that you provide a brief response to these questions prior to the audit.
If you have any questions regarding the audit, please contact me.
pio1 i*ned by Harry Rood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects -
III/IV/V
& Special Projects
Enclosures:
- 1. Agenda
- 2. Questions DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC & Local PDRs PD-5 Plant D. M. Crutchfield G. M. Holahan J. Lee H. Rood 8706020230 870526 OGC-Bethesda PDR ADOCK 05000361 E. Jordan P
DRSP/PDV DRSP/PDV PDV JLee HRood:cd G
ton 5/24/87 5/6(/87 87 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin San Onofre Nuclear Generating Southern California Edison Company Station, Units 2 and 3 cc:
Mr. James C. Holcombe Mr. Hans Kaspar, Executive Director Vice President - Power Supply Marine Review Committee, Inc.
San Diego Gas & Electric Company 531 Encinitas Boulevard, Suite 105 101 Ash Street Encinitas, California 92024 Post Office Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Charles R. Kocher, Esq.
Mr. Mark Medford James A. Beoletto, Esq.
Southern California Edison Company Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue P. 0. Box 800 P. 0. Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Rosemead, California 91770 Mr. Stephen B. Allman Manager, Nuclear Department Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe San Diego Gas & Electric Company ATTN:
David R. Pigott, Esq.
P. 0. Box 1831 600 Montgomery Street San Diego, California 92112 San Francisco, California 94111 Richard J. Wharton, Esq.
University of San Diego School of Alan R. Watts, Esq.
Law Rourke & Woodruff Environmental Law Clinic 701 S. Parker St. No. 7000 San Diego, California 92110 Orange, California 92668-4702 Charles E. McClung, Jr., Esq.
Attorney at Law Mr. S. McClusky 24012 Calle de la Plaza/Suite 330 Bechtel Power Corporation Laguna Hills, California 92653 P. 0. Box 60860, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, California 90060 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. C. B. Brinkman 1450 Maria Lane/Suite 210 Combustion Engineering, Inc.
Walnut Creek, California 94596 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 1310 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Resident Inspector, San Onofre NPS c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Dennis F. Kirsh Post Office Box 4329 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission San Clemente, California 92672 Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Mr. Dennis M. Smith, Chief Radiological Programs Division Governor's Office of Emergency Services 2800 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832
TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR POST-IMPLEMENTATION AUDIT OF SAN ONOFRE, UNITS 2 AND 3, SAFETY PARAMETER DISPLAY SYSTEM (SPDS)
JUNE 15 THROUGH 18, 1987 DAY 1 1:00 pm Introduction and Briefing (NRC) 1:30 pm Overview of SPDS Implementation (Presentations by Licensee)
Definition of SPDS Parameter Selection Process Human Factors Engineering-Program Reliability Verification and Validation Program Implementation Program Project Milestones 5:30 p.m. -
Adjourn DAY 2 8:30 am Tour of Control Room/SPDS Demonstration 10:00 am Critical Safety Function/Parameter Selection (Presentations by Licensee),
Parameter Selection Critical Safety Functions (vs. NUREG-0737)
Critical Safety Functions/Parameter Relationships Range of Events/Conditions covered by parameters Safety Evaluation Report Concerns 12:00 Lunch 1:00 pm System Design (Presentations by Licensee)
System Description
Display Configuration Data Validity Security 1
kwmanatonetcoorw
TENTATIVE AGENDA (continued)
System Verification and Validation (Presentations by Licensee)
Verification Test Plan Validation Maintenance & Configuration Control 4:30 pm Discussion/planning for next day 5:30 pm Adjourn DAY 3 8:30 am Human Factors Engineerinq Review (Control Room)
Display Location Display Format Display Techniques Open Concerns Operations Review (Control Room)
Concise Display Parameters identified in SAR on SPDS Critical Safety Functions (0737 and Plant)
Reliability (Hardware/Software)
Response Times (Display Call-up and Screen Update)
Integrated into Emergency Operations SPDS Parameter Values vs. Fixed Panel Values (Comparison)
Procedures and Training Control Room SPDS vs. Simulator SPDS Comparison Electrical Isolation (This should be omitted if covered by a separate review) 12:00 Lunch 2
TENTATIVE AGENDA (continued) 1:00 pm Operator Interviews Shift Supervisor Reactor Operator Shift Technical Advisor Documentation Review 3:30 pm Audit Team Caucus 5:00 pm Adjourn DAY 4 10:00 am Exit Briefing 12:00 Exit 3
ENCLOSURE 2 Questions on Status of SPDS
- 1. Date SPDS was declared operational according to issued orders.
- 2. Date Verification and Validation program on SPDS was completed.
- 3. Were operators trained and are procedures available for using SPDS?
Do you have similar problems?
- 5. What is the operational unavailability of your SPDS?
- 6. Is the SPDS incorporated in the Emergency Procedures?
- 7. Who is the primary user of the SPDS?
- 8. Have modifications been made to the SPDS since it was declared operational?
- 9. Does the operational staff believe that the SPDS makes the operator's job easier?