Text

LLC 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, 7.0 Historical Data Tables
	ML13142A530
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	05/15/2013
From:	; Constellation Energy Group, EDF Group, Nine Mile Point
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	Download: ML13142A530 (49)
	v • d • e

7.0 HISTORICAL DATA TABLES Sample Statistics from Previous Environmental Sampling The mean, minimum value and maximum value were calculated for selected sample mediums and isotopes.

Special Considerations:

1. Sample data listed as 1969 was taken from the NINE MILE POINT, PREOPERATION SURVEY, 1969 and ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT FOR NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, NOVEMBER, 1970.

2. Sample results listed as 1974 and 1975 were taken from the respective Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports for Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Nuclear Station. Sample results listed as 1986 through the current year were taken from the respective Nine Mile point Nuclear Power Station Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports.

3. Only measured values were used for statistical calculations.

7-1

TABLE 7-1 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA SHORELINE SEDIMENT (CONTROL) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi/g (dry)) Co-60 (pCi/lg (dry))

(b) Sampling was initiated in 1979. Sampling was not required prior to 1979.

7-2

TABLE 7-2 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA SHORELINE SEDIMENT (INDICATOR) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi/g (dry) Co-60 (pCi/g (d))

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN MIN. MAX. MEAN 1985(b' LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1986 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1987 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1988 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1989 0.25 0.34 0.30 LLD LLD LLD 1990 0.28 0.28 0.28 LLD LLD LLD 1991 0.11 0.16 0.14 LLD LLD LLD 1992 0.10 0.16 0.13 LLD LLD LLD 1993 0.17 0.49 0.33 LLD LLD LLD 1994 0.08 0.39 0.24 LLD LLD LLD 1995 0.16 0.17 0.16 LLD LLD LLD 1996 0.13 0.18 0.16 LLD LLD LLD 1997 0.13 0.18 0.16 LLD LLD LLD 1998 0.07 0.07 0.07 LLD LLD LLD 1999 0.06 0.09 0.08 LLD LLD LLD 2000 0.06 0.08 0.07 LLD LLD LLD 2001 0.06 0.07 0.07 LLD LLD LLD 2002 0.05 0.05 0.05 LLD LLD LLD 2003 0.04 0.05 0.05 LLD LLD LLD 2004 0.04 0.04 0.04 LLD LLD LLD 2005 0.06 0.09 0.08 LLD LLD LLD 2006 0.06 0.06 0.06 LLD LLD LLD 2007 0.04 0.04 0.04 LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD (a) Location was offsite at Sunset Beach (closest location with recreational value).

(b) Sampling initiated in 1985 as required by Technical Specifications requirements.

7-3

TABLE 7-3 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA FISH (CONTROL) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi/g (wet))

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 1976 1.2 1.2 1.2 1977 0.13 0.13 0.13 1978 0.04 0.20 0.09 1979 0.03 0.06 0.04 1980 0.03 0.11 0.06 1981 0.028 0.062 0.043 1982 0.027 0.055 0.046 1983 0.041 0.057 0.049 1984 0.015 0.038 0.032 1985 0.026 0.047 0.034 1986 0.021 0.032 0.025 1987 0.017 0.040 0.031 1988 0.023 0.053 0.033 1989 0.020 0.033 0.029 1990 0.025 0.079 0.043 1991 0.016 0.045 0.030 1992 0.019 0.024 0.022 1993 0.023 0.041 0.032 1994 0.012 0.035 0.024 1995 0.014 0.020 0.016 1996 0.014 0.018 0.016 1997 0.019 0.043 0.031 1998 0.013 0.013 0.013 1999 LLD LLD LLD 2000 0.021 0.021 0.021 2001 LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD (a) Control location was at an area beyond the influence of the site (westerly direction).

7-4

TABLE 7-4 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA FISH (INDICATOR) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi// (wet))

YEAR MIN. MAX. I MEAN 1976 0.5 3.9 1.4 1977 0.13 0.79 0.29 1978 0.03 0.10 0.08 1979 0.02 0.55 0.10 1980 0.03 0.10 0.06 1981 0.03 0.10 0.06 1982 0.034 0.064 0.048 1983 0.033 0.056 0.045 1984 0.033 0.061 0.043 1985 0.018 0.044 0.030 1986 0.009 0.051 0.028 1987 0.024 0.063 0.033 1988 0.020 0.074 0.034 1989 0.020 0.043 0.035 1990 0.024 0.115 0.044 1991 0.021 0.035 0.027 1992 0.013 0.034 0.026 1993 0.021 0.038 0.030 1994 0.011 0.028 0.020 1995 0.016 0.019 0.018 1996 0.014 0.016 0.015 1997 0.015 0.017 0.016 1998 0.021 0.021 0.021 1999 0.016 0.018 0.017 2000 LLD LLD LLD 2001 LLD LLD LLD 2002 0.016 0.016 0.016 2003 LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD (a) Indicator locations are in the general area of the NMP1 and J. A. FitzPatrick cooling water discharge structures.

7-5

TABLE 7-5 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA SURFACE WATER (CONTROL) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi/liter) Co-60 (pCi/liter)

(a) Location was the City of Oswego Water Supply for 1976 - 1984, and the Oswego Steam Station inlet canal for 1985 - 2012.

(b) No gamma analyses performed (not required).

(c) Data showed instrument background results.

7-6

TABLE 7-6 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA SURFACE WATER (INDICATOR) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi/liter) Co-60 (pCi/liter)

(b) No gamma analyses performed (not required).

(c) Data showed instrument background results.

7-7

TABLE 7-7 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA SURFACE WATER TRITIUM (CONTROL) (a)

TRITIUM (pCi/liter)

YEAR I MIN. I_____ MAX. EAN 1976 440 929 652 1977 300 530 408 1978 215 490 304 1979 174 308 259 1980 211 290 257 1981 211 328 276 1982 112 307 165 1983 230 280 250 1984 190 220 205 1985 230 370 278 1986 250 550 373 1987 140 270 210 1988 240 460 320 1989 180 660 373 1990 260 320 290 1991 180 200 190 1992 190 310 242 1993 160 230 188 1994 250 250 250 1995 230 230 230 1996 LLD LLD LLD 1997 LLD LLD LLD 1998 190 190 190 1999 220 510 337 2000 196 237 212 2001 LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD (a) Control location is the City of Oswego drinking water for 1976 - 1984, and the Oswego Steam Station inlet canal for 1985 - 2012.

7-8

TABLE 7-8 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA SURFACE WATER TRITIUM (INDICATOR) (')

TRITIUM (pCi/liter)

YEAR MIN. I MAX. MEAN 1976 365 889 627 1977 380 530 455 1978 377 560 476 1979 176 276 228 1980 150 306 227 1981 212 388 285 1982 194 311 266 1983 249 560 347 1984 110 370 280 1985 250 1200 (b) 530 1986 260 500 380 1987 160 410 322 1988 430 480 460 1989 210 350 280 1990 220 290 250 1991 250 390 310 1992 240 300 273 1993 200 280 242 1994 180 260 220 1995 320 320 320 1996 LLD LLD LLD 1997 160 160 160 1998 190 190 190 1999 180 270 233 2000 161 198 185 2001 LLD LLD LLD 2002 297 297 297 2003 LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD (a) Indicator location is the FitzPatrick inlet canal.

(b) Suspect sample contamination. Recollected samples showed normal levels of tritium.

7-9

TABLE 7-9 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA GROUNDWATER TRITIUM (CONTROL) (a)

TRITIUM (DCi/liter)

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 2005 <854 <854 <854 2006(') <447 <825 <636 2007 <442 <445 <444 2008 <427 <439 <431 2009 <411 <418 <415 2010 <172 <410 <341 2011 <408 <424 <415 2012 <363 <499 <420 (a) Control well locations (2) are upland wells located south of protected area.

(b) Required LLD changed to 500 pCi/l from 1000 pCi/l 7-10

TABLE 7-10 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS TRITIUM (INDICATOR) (a)

TRITIUM (pCi/liter)

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 2005 <854 <871 <863 2 0 0 6(b) <462 <933 <823 2007 <440 <461 <445 2008 <427 <439 <433 2009 <406 <424 <413 2010 <287 611(c) <384 2011 <407 <428 <414 2012 <314 <499 <395 (a) Indicator locations are down gradient wells located in the owner control area.

(b) Required LLD changed to 500 pCi/I from 1000 pCi/l (c) Re-sample tritium concentration = <268 pCi/l TABLE 7-10a HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA NMP2 STORM DRAIN TRITIUM (INDICATOR) (a)

TRITIUM (pCi/liter)

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 2005 <854 <871 <863 2006(') <667 <933 <850 2007 <440 <461 <447 2008 <415 <446 <432 2009 <406 <424 <413 2010 <289 446(c) <408 2011 <407 <428 <414 2012 <298 908+/-208 <417 (a) NMP2 depression cone system.

(b) Required LLD changed to 500 pCi/I from 1000 pCi/l (c) Re-sample tritium concentration = <420 pCi/l 7-11

TABLE 7-11 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (CONTROL) (a)

GROSS BETA (pCi/m3 )

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 1977 0.001 0.484 0.125 1978 0.01 0.66 0.16 1979 0.010 0.703 0.077 1980 0.009 0.291 0.056 1981 0.016 0.549 0.165 1982 0.011 0.078 0.033 1983 0.007 0.085 0.024 1984 0.013 0.051 0.026 1985 0.013 0.043 0.024 1986 0.008 0.272 0.039 1987 0.009 0.037 0.021 1988 0.008 0.039 0.018 1989 0.007 0.039 0.017 1990 0.003 0.027 0.013 1991 0.006 0.028 0.014 1992 0.006 0.020 0.012 1993 0.007 0.022 0.013 1994 0.008 0.025 0.015 1995 0.006 0.023 0.014 1996 0.008 0.023 0.014 1997 0.006 0.025 0.013 1998 0.004 0.034 0.014 1999 0.010 0.032 0.017 2000 0.006 0.027 0.015 2001 0.006 0.034 0.016 2002 0.008 0.027 0.016 2003 0.004 0.032 0.015 2004 0.008 0.032 0.016 2005 0.008 0.034 0.019 2006 0.007 0.033 0.016 2007 0.008 0.028 0.016 2008 0.007 0.031 0.015 2009 0.006 0.032 0.016 2010 0.004 0.026 0.014 2011 0.008 0.034 0.018 2012 .5.

0.005 0.025

£ ________________________ 1 0.016 (a) Locations used for 1977 - 1984 were C off-site, D I off-site, D2 off-site, E off-site, F off-site, and G off-site. Control location R-5 off-site was used for 1985 - 2012 (formerly C offsite location).

7-12

TABLE 7-12 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA (INDICATOR) (a)

GROSS BETA (pCi/m3 )

YEAR MIN. MAX. I MEAN 1977 0.002 0.326 0.106 1978 0.01 0.34 0.11 1979 0.001 0.271 0.058 1980 0.002 0.207 0.044 1981 0.004 0.528 0.151 1982 0.001 0.113 0.031 1983 0.002 0.062 0.023 1984 0.002 0.058 0.025 1985 0.010 0.044 0.023 1986 0.007 0.289 0.039 1987 0.009 0.040 0.021 1988 0.007 0.040 0.018 1989 0.007 0.041 0.017 1990 0.005 0.023 0.014 1991 0.007 0.033 0.015 1992 0.005 0.024 0.013 1993 0.005 0.025 0.014 1994 0.006 0.025 0.015 1995 0.004 0.031 0.014 1996 0.006 0.025 0.013 1997 0.001 0.018 0.010 1998 0.002 0.040 0.015 1999 0.009 0.039 0.017 2000 0.005 0.033 0.015 2001 0.004 0.037 0.016 2002 0.006 0.026 0.016 2003 0.005 0.035 0.015 2004 0.003 0.037 0.016 2005 0.007 0.040 0.018 2006 0.005 0.035 0.015 2007 0.007 0.028 0.016 2008 0.004 0.030 0.016 2009 0.006 0.032 0.016 2010 0.005 0.030 0.016 2011 0.007 0.034 0.018 2012 0.004 0.031 0.016 (a) Locations used for 1977 - 1984 were D1 onsite, D2 onsite, E onsite, F onsite, G onsite, H onsite, I onsite, J onsite, and K onsite as applicable. 1985 - 2012 locations were R- 1 offsite, R-2 offsite, R-3 offsite, and R-4 offsite.

7-13

TABLE 7-13 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA AIR PARTICULATES (CONTROL) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi/m 3) Co-60 (pCi/m3)

YEAR MIN. IMAX.I MEAN }MIN. I MAX. I MEAN 1977 0.0002 0.0112 0.0034 0.0034 0.0347 0.0172 1978 0.0008 0.0042 0.0018 0.0003 0.0056 0.0020 1979 0.0008 0.0047 0.0016 0.0005 0.0014 0.0009 1980 0.0015 0.0018 0.0016 LLD LLD LLD 1981 0.0003 0.0042 0.0017 0.0003 0.0012 0.0008 1982 0.0002 0.0009 0.0004 0.0004 0.0007 0.0006 1983 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 1984 LLD LLD LLD 0.0004 0.0012 0.0008 1985 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1986 0.0075 0.0311 0.0193 LLD LLD LLD 1987 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1988 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1989 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1990 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1991 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1992 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1993 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1994 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1995 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1996 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1997 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1998 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1999 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2000 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2001 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD (a) Locations included composites of C, Dl, E, F, and G offsite air monitoring locations for 1977 - 1984.

Sample location included only R-5 air monitoring location for 1985 - 2012.

7- 14

TABLE 7-14 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA AIR PARTICULATES (INDICATOR) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi/m3) Co-60 (pCi/n 3)

YEAR MIN. I MAX. I MEAN j MIN. MAX. MEAN 1977 0.0001 0.0105 0.0043 0.0003 0.0711 0.0179 1978 0.0003 0.0026 0.0016 0.0003 0.0153 0.0023 1979 0.0003 0.0020 0.0010 0.0003 0.0007 0.0005 1980 0.0005 0.0019 0.0011 0.0016 0.0016 0.0016 1981 0.0002 0.0045 0.0014 0.0002 0.0017 0.0006 1982 0.0001 0.0006 0.0004 0.0003 0.0010 0.0005 1983 0.0002 0.0003 0.0002 0.0003 0.0017 0.0007 1984 LLD LLD LLD 0.0007 0.0017 0.0012 1985 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1986 0.0069 0.0364 0.0183 LLD LLD LLD 1987 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1988 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1989 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1990 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1991 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1992 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1993 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1994 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1995 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1996 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1997 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1998 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1999 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2000 LLD LLD LLD 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 2001 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD (a) Locations included composites of D 1, D2, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K onsite air monitoring locations for 1977 - 1984. Locations included R- 1 through R-4 air monitoring locations for 1985 - 2012.

7-15

TABLE 7-15 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA AIR RADIOIODINE (CONTROL) (a)

IODINE-131 (pCi/n 3 )

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 1976 0.01 5.88 0.60 1977 0.02 0.82 0.32 1978 0.03 0.04 0.03 1979 LLD LLD LLD 1980 LLD LLD LLD 1981 LLD LLD LLD 1982 0.039 0.039 0.039 1983 LLD LLD LLD 1984 LLD LLD LLD 1985 LLD LLD LLD 1986 0.041 0.332 0.151 1987 LLD LLD LLD 1988 LLD LLD LLD 1989 LLD LLD LLD 1990 LLD LLD LLD 1991 LLD LLD LLD 1992 LLD LLD LLD 1993 LLD LLD LLD 1994 LLD LLD LLD 1995 LLD LLD LLD 1996 LLD LLD LLD 1997 LLD LLD LLD 1998 LLD LLD LLD 1999 LLD LLD LLD 2000 LLD LLD LLD 2001 LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD 2011 0.034(b) 0.093(b) 0.055(b) 2012 LLD LLD LLD (a) Locations D1 off-site, D2 off-site, E off-site, F off-site, and G off-site used for 1976 - 1984.

Location R-5 off-site used for 1985 - 2012.

(b) 1-131 concentration attributed to fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station accident.

7-16

TABLE 7-16 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA AIR RADIOIODINE (INDICATOR) 12)

IODINE-131 (pCi/m3)

YEAR MIN. I MAX. MEAN 1976 0.01 2.09 0.33 1977 0.02 0.73 0.31 1978 0.02 0.07 0.04 1979 LLD LLD LLD 1980 0.013 0.013 0.013 1981 0.016 0.042 0.029 1982 0.002 0.042 0.016 1983 0.022 0.035 0.028 1984 LLD LLD LLD 1985 LLD LLD LLD 1986 0.023 0.360 0.119 1987 0.011 0.018 0.014 1988 LLD LLD LLD 1989 LLD LLD LLD 1990 LLD LLD LLD 1991 LLD LLD LLD 1992 LLD LLD LLD 1993 LLD LLD LLD 1994 LLD LLD LLD 1995 LLD LLD LLD 1996 LLD LLD LLD 1997 LLD LLD LLD 1998 LLD LLD LLD 1999 LLD LLD LLD 2000 LLD LLD LLD 2001 LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD 2011 0.02 1(b) 0.110j) 0.055b) 2012 LLD LLD LLD (a) Locations used for 1976 - 1984 were D1 on-site, D2 on-site, E on-site, F on-site, G on-site, H on-site, I on-site, J on-site, and K on-site, as applicable. Locations used for 1985 - 2012 were R1 off-site, R-2 off-site, R-3 off-site, and R-4 off-site.

(b) 1-131 concentration attributed to fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station accident.

7-17

TABLE 7-17 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL TLD (CONTROL) (a)

DOSE (mrem per standard month)

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 1969 (b) (b) (b) 1970 6.0 7.3 6.7 1971 2.0 6.7 4.3 1972 2.2 6.2 4.4 1973 2.2 6.9 4.7 1974 2.7 8.9 5.6 1975 4.8 6.0 5.5 1976 3.2 7.2 5.4 1977 4.0 8.0 5.3 1978 3.3 4.7 4.3 1979 3.3 5.7 4.7 1980 3.8 5.8 4.9 1981 3.5 5.9 4.8 1982 3.8 6.1 5.1 1983 4.9 7.2 5.8 1984 4.7 8.2 6.2 1985 4.5 (4.4)* 7.6 (6.8)* 5.6 (5.4)*

1986 5.3 (5.5)* 7.5 (7.2)* 6.3 (6.3)*

1987 4.6 (4.6)* 6.6 (5.8)* 5.4 (5.2)*

1988 4.4 (4.8)* 6.8 (6.8)* 5.6 (5.4)*

1989 2.9 (2.9)* 6.4 (5.6)* 4.7 (4.6)*

1990 3.7 (3.7)* 6.0 (5.9)* 4.8 (4.6)*

1991 3.8 (3.8)* 5.4 (5.3)* 4.5 (4.3)*

1992 2.6 (2.6)* 5.0 (4.7)* 4.1 (3.9)*

1993 3.4 (3.4)* 5.6 (5.2)* 4.4 (4.3)*

1994 3.1 (3.1)* 5.0 (4.6)* 4.1 (3.9)*

1995 3.4 (3.4)* 5.7 (4.9)* 4.4 (4.2)*

1996 3.4 (3.4)* 5.6 (5.6)* 4.3 (4.2)*

1997 3.7 (3.9)* 6.2 (5.2)* 4.7 (4.6)*

1998 3.7 (3.7)* 5.6 (4.8)* 4.4 (4.2)*

1999 3.6 (3.7)* 7.1 (4.7)* 4.6 (4.4)*

2000 3.7 (3.7)* 7.3 (5.5)* 4.7 (4.3)*

2001 3.6 (3.9)* 5.4 (5.0)* 4.4 (4.4)*

2002 3.4 (3.4)* 5.5 (5.2)* 4.3 (4.1)*

2003 3.4 (3.4)* 5.5 (4.8)* 4.2 (4.2)*

2004 3.3 (3.3)* 5.9 (5.9)* 4.3 (4.5)*

2005 3.3 (3.4)* 5.1 (4.5)* 4.1 (4.0)*

2006 3.3 (3.3)* 5.3 (4.4)* 4.1 (4.0)*

2007 3.2 (3.2)* 5.8 (5.3)* 4.4 (4.3)*

2008 3.3(3.3)* 5.1(4.8)* 4.1(4.0)*

2009 3.2(3.2)* 4.8(4.2)* 3.9(3.7)*

2010 2.7(2.7)* 4.6(4.1)* 3.9(3.6)*

2011 2.6(2.6)* 5.5(4.7)* 4.0(3.8)*

2012 3.6(3.6)* 5.0(4.3)* 4.0(3.9)*

(a) TLD #8, 14, 49, 111 and 113 where applicable.

(b) Data not available.

(*) TLD result based on the ODCM required locations (TLD #14 and 49).

7-18

TABLE 7-18 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL TLD (SITE BOUNDARY) (a)

DOSE (mrem per standard month)

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 19850b) 4.1 12.6 6.2 1986 4.4 18.7 7.0 1987 4.4 14.3 6.1 1988 3.4 17.9 6.4 1989 2.8 15.4 5.9 1990 3.6 14.8 5.8 1991 3.2 16.7 5.7 1992 3.2 10.4 4.8 1993 3.3 11.6 5.3 1994 2.8 12.4 5.2 1995 3.5 9.6 5.4 1996 3.2 9.1 5.2 1997 3.5 10.2 5.9 1998 3.7 9.4 5.4 1999 3.3 12.3 5.8 2000 3.6 10.0 5.5 2001 3.6 10.3 5.7 2002 3.5 9.4 5.4 2003 3.2 8.9 5.4 2004 3.3 10.8 5.6 2005 3.4 9.2 5.5 2006 3.5 9.2 5.4 2007 3.2 9.0 5.6 2008 3.2 8.8 5.2 2009 3.1 11.7 5.4 2010 3.3 12.1 5.4 2011 3.1 11.6 5.5 2012 3.6 10.6 5.5 (a) TLD locations initiated in 1985 as required by the new Technical Specifications. Includes TLD numbers 7, 18, 23, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, and 87.

(b) Not required prior to 1985.

7-19

TABLE 7-19 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL TLD (OFF-SITE SECTORS) (a)

DOSE (mrem per standard month)

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 1985(b) 4.0 7.1 5.0 1986 4.6 8.6 6.0 1987 4.3 6.0 5.2 1988 3.8 7.0 5.3 1989 2.5 6.8 4.9 1990 3.6 6.3 4.7 1991 3.6 5.6 4.5 1992 2.9 5.0 4.1 1993 3.4 6.3 4.5 1994 3.0 5.1 4.0 1995 3.2 5.2 4.2 1996 3.2 5.3 4.2 1997 3.5 5.8 4.5 1998 3.5 5.0 4.2 1999 3.6 5.6 4.4 2000 3.4 6.6 4.5 2001 3.6 5.4 4.4 2002 3.1 5.3 4.2 2003 3.4 4.8 4.1 2004 3.2 6.7 4.4 2005 3.2 4.7 4.0 2006 3.3 4.4 4.0 2007 3.1 5.1 4.2 2008 3.2 4.5 3.8 2009 3.3 4.5 3.9 2010 3.0 4.4 3.9 2011 3.0 5.2 4.0 2012 3.5 4.6 4.0 (a) TLD locations initiated in 1985 as required by the new Technical Specifications. Includes TLD numbers 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, and 95.

(b) Not required prior to 1985.

7 - 20

TABLE 7-20 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL TLD (SPECIAL INTEREST) () b,)

DOSE (mremn ner standard mo Ih YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 1985(c) 3.9 6.8 5.3 1986 4.8 8.2 6.1 1987 3.5 6.0 5.1 1988 3.9 6.6 5.3 1989 2.1 7.0 4.8 1990 3.2 6.3 4.7 1991 2.9 5.6 4.4 1992 3.0 4.8 4.1 1993 3.2 5.8 4.5 1994 2.9 4.8 4.0 1995 3.4 4.9 4.3 1996 3.2 5.3 4.2 1997 3.5 5.4 4.5 1998 3.7 4.9 4.3 1999 3.6 5.5 4.4 2000 3.6 6.3 4.5 2001 3.8 5.0 4.3 2002 3.5 4.7 4.1 2003 3.4 5.0 4.2 2004 3.0 5.9 4.2 2005 3.4 4.7 3.9 2006 3.5 4.6 4.0 2007 3.0 5.1 4.2 2008 3.1 4.6 3.9 2009 3.1 4.5 3.8 2010 3.2 4.7 3.8 2011 2.9 4.9 4.0 2012 3.4 4.7 4.0 (a) TLD locations initiated in 1985 as required by the new Technical Specifications. TLD's included are numbers 15, 56, 58, 96, 97 and 98.

(b) TLD locations include critical residences and populated areas near the site.

(c) Not required prior to 1985.

7-21

TABLE 7-21 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL TLD (ON-SITE INDICATOR) (a)

DOSE (mrem per standard month)

YEAR I _MIN. I MAX. MEAN 1969 (b) (b) (b) 1970 4.7 9.0 6.0 1971 1.5 7.7 4.7 1972 2.3 8.2 4.9 1973 3.0 24.4 6.6 1974 3.1 10.6 5.7 1975 4.6 16.0 7.3 1976 3.7 18.8 6.9 1977 3.0 15.3 5.7 1978 3.0 9.0 4.3 1979 2.7 8.3 4.3 1980 3.9 12.0 5.3 1981 4.1 11.8 5.8 1982 3.9 13.0 6.3 1983 5.0 16.5 6.9 1984 4.6 13.2 7.0 1985 4.7 15.9 6.3 1986 4.7 16.1 7.0 1987 4.0 11.4 5.8 1988 4.4 11.9 6.0 1989 2.7 14.5 6.0 1990 3.6 12.9 5.5 1991 3.2 11.6 5.1 1992 3.2 5.6 4.3 1993 3.1 13.6 5.2 1994 2.8 14.3 5.1 1995 3.5 28.6 6.2 1996 3.1 32.6 6.4 1997 3.5 28.8 7.7 1998 3.6 28.8 6.2 1999 3.3 28.4 6.6 2000 3.7 16.5 5.6 2001 3.8 14.5 5.6 2002 3.5 13.6 5.3 2003 3.2 12.9 5.3 2004 3.3 13.2 5.4 2005 3.4 14.1 5.4 2006 3.5 14.4 5.3 2007 3.2 14.8 5.6 2008 3.2 13.8 5.2 2009 3.1 13.6 4.9 2010 3.3 13.3 4.8 2011 3.1 13.0 5.1 2012 3.5 11.8 4.9 (a) Includes TLD numbers 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (1970 - 1973). Includes TLD numbers 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 23, 24, 25, and 26 (1974 - 2011). Locations are existing or previous on-site environmental air monitoring locations.

(b) No data available.

7 -22

TABLE 7-22 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL TLD (OFF-SITE INDICATOR) (a)

DOSE (mrem per standard month)

YEAR MIN. MAX. MEAN 1969 (b) (b) (b) 1970 5.0 8.0 6.7 1971 1.1 7.7 4.5 1972 1.8 6.6 4.4 1973 2.2 6.9 4.1 1974 2.4 8.9 5.3 1975 4.5 7.1 5.5 1976 3.4 7.2 5.2 1977 3.7 8.0 5.3 1978 2.7 4.7 3.7 1979 3.0 5.7 4.0 1980 3.1 5.8 4.6 1981 3.6 5.9 4.7 1982 4.0 6.2 5.2 1983 4.6 7.2 5.6 1984 4.6 8.2 6.1 1985 4.6 7.7 5.5 1986 5.0 7.6 6.1 1987 4.4 6.6 5.2 1988 4.2 6.6 5.4 1989 2.8 6.4 4.6 1990 3.8 6.0 4.8 1991 3.4 5.4 4.3 1992 3.1 5.2 4.1 1993 3.2 5.6 4.3 1994 3.0 5.0 4.1 1995 3.9 5.7 4.4 1996 3.3 5.5 4.1 1997 3.7 6.2 4.7 1998 3.9 5.6 4.4 1999 3.8 7.1 4.6 2000 3.8 7.3 4.6 2001 3.7 5.9 4.5 2002 3.6 5.5 4.4 2003 3.1 5.5 4.4 2004 3.2 6.5 4.5 2005 3.6 5.1 4.2 2006 3.9 5.3 4.2 2007 3.4 5.8 4.5 2008 3.3 5.1 4.1 2009 3.3 4.8 3.9 2010 3.5 4.6 3.8 2011 3.2 5.5 4.1 2012 3.6 5.0 4.1 (a) Includes TLD numbers 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 (off-site environmental air monitoring locations).

(b) No data available.

7-23

TABLE 7-23 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA MILK (CONTROL) (')

Cs-137 (pCi/liter) 1-131 (pCi/liter)

YEAR MIN. MAX. IMEAN MIN. MAX. IMEAN 1976 (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) 1977 (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) 1978 2.4 7.8 5.8 LLD LLD LLD 1979 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1980 3.6 5.6 4.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1981 3.9 3.9 3.9 LLD LLD LLD 1982 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1983 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1984 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1985 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1986 5.3 12.4 8.4 0.8 29.0 13.6 1987 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1988 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1989 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1990 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1991 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1992 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1993 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1994 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1995 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1996 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1997 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1998 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1999 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2000 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2001 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD (a) Location used was an available milk sample location in a least prevalent wind direction greater than ten miles from the site.

(b) No data available (samples not required).

7 -24

TABLE 7-24 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA MILK (INDICATOR) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi/liter) 1-131 (pCi/liter)

YEAR MIN. I MAX. MEAN MIN. MAX. I MEAN 1976 4.0 15.0 9.3 0.02 45.00 3.20 1977 11.0 22.0 17.1 0.01 49.00 6.88 1978 3.4 33.0 9.9 0.19 0.19 0.19 1979 3.2 53.0 9.4 LLD LLD LLD 1980 3.2 21.0 8.1 0.3 8.8 3.8 1981 3.5 29.0 8.6 LLD LLD LLD 1982 3.5 14.0 5.7 LLD LLD LLD 1983 3.3 10.9 7.2 LLD LLD LLD 1984 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1985 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1986 6.1 11.1 8.6 0.3 30.0 5.2 1987 5.5 8.1 6.8 LLD LLD LLD 1988 10.0 10.0 10.0 LLD LLD LLD 1989 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1990 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1991 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1992 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1993 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1994 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1995 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1996 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1997 LLD LLD LLD 0.50 0.50 0.50 1998 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 1999 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2000 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2001 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD LLD (a) Locations sampled were available downwind locations within ten miles with high radionuclide deposition potential.

7-25

TABLE 7-25 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA FOOD PRODUCTS (CONTROL) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi/g (wet))

YEAR@bXc) MIN. I_ MAX. -I MEAN 1980 0.02 0.02 0.02 1981 LLD LLD LLD 1982 LLD LLD LLD 1983 LLD LLD LLD 1984 LLD LLD LLD 1985 LLD LLD LLD 1986 LLD LLD LLD 1987 LLD LLD LLD 1988 LLD LLD LLD 1989 LLD LLD LLD 1990 LLD LLD LLD 1991 LLD LLD LLD 1992 LLD LLD LLD 1993 0.007 0.007 0.007 1994 LLD LLD LLD 1995 LLD LLD LLD 1996 LLD LLD LLD 1997 LLD LLD LLD 1998 LLD LLD LLD 1999 LLD LLD LLD 2000 LLD LLD LLD 2001 LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD (a) Location was an available food product sample location in a least prevalent wind direction greater than ten miles from the site.

(b) Data comprised of broadleaf and non-broadleaf vegetation (1980 - 1984, 2007 - 2009, 2011 &

2012).

(c) Data comprised of broadleaf vegetation only (1985 - 2006 & 2010).

7 - 26

TABLE 7-26 HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE DATA FOOD PRODUCTS (INDICATOR) (a)

Cs-137 (pCi*g (wet))

YEAR(*Xc) MIN. I MAX. E MEAN 1976-1978 LLD LLD LLD 1979 0.004 0.004 0.004 1980 0.004 0.060 0.036 1981 LLD LLD LLD 1982 LLD LLD LLD 1983 LLD LLD LLD 1984 LLD LLD LLD 1985 0.047 0.047 0.047 1986 LLD LLD LLD 1987 LLD LLD LLD 1988 0.008 0.008 0.008 1989 0.009 0.009 0.009 1990 LLD LLD LLD 1991 0.040 0.040 0.040 1992 LLD LLD LLD 1993 LLD LLD LLD 1994 0.004 0.011 0.008 1995 0.010 0.012 0.011 1996 LLD LLD LLD 1997 0.012 0.012 0.012 1998 LLD LLD LLD 1999 0.008 0.008 0.008 2000 LLD LLD LLD 2001 LLD LLD LLD 2002 LLD LLD LLD 2003 LLD LLD LLD 2004 LLD LLD LLD 2005 LLD LLD LLD 2006 LLD LLD LLD 2007 LLD LLD LLD 2008 LLD LLD LLD 2009 LLD LLD LLD 2010 LLD LLD LLD 2011 LLD LLD LLD 2012 LLD LLD LLD (a) Indicator locations were available downwind locations within ten miles of the site and with high radionuclide deposition potential.

(b) Data comprised of broadleaf and non-broadleaf vegetation (1976 - 1984, 2007 - 2009, 2011 &

2012).

(c) Data comprised of broadleaf vegetation only (1985 - 2006 & 2010).

7 - 27

8.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM 8.1 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Offsite Dose Calculation Manuals (ODCM), for Nine Mile Point Unit 1 (NMP 1) and Nine Mile Point Unit 2 (NMP2), Part II, Section 4.0 requires that the licensee participate in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program. The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall include sample media for which samples are routinely collected and for which comparison samples are commercially available. Participation in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program ensures that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurement of radioactive material in the environmental samples are performed as part of the Quality Assurance Program for environmental monitoring. To fulfill the requirement for an Interlaboratory Comparison Program, the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAFNPP) Environmental Laboratory has engaged the services of Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Incorporated in Atlanta, Georgia.

Eckert & Ziegler Analytics supplies sample media as blind sample spikes, which contain certified levels of radioactivity unknown to the analysis laboratory. These samples are prepared and analyzed by the JAF Environmental Laboratory using standard laboratory procedures. Eckert & Ziegler Analytics issues a statistical summary report of the results. The JAFNPP Environmental Laboratory uses predetermined acceptance criteria methodology for evaluating the laboratory's performance.

The JAFNPP Environmental Laboratory also analyzes laboratory blanks. The analysis of laboratory blanks provides a means to detect and measure radioactive contamination of analytical samples. The analysis of analytical blanks also provides information on the adequacy of background subtraction. Laboratory blank results are analyzed using control charts.

8-1

8.2 PROGRAM SCHEDULE SAMPLE PROVIDER SAMPLE LABORATORY ECKERT & ZIEGLER MEDIA ANALYSIS ANALYTICS Water Gross Beta 3 Water Tritium 5 Water 1-131 3 Water Mixed Gamma 4 Air Gross Beta 3 Air 1-131 4 Air Mixed Gamma 2 Milk 1-131 3 Milk Mixed Gamma 3 Soil Mixed Gamma 1 Vegetation Mixed Gamma 2 TOTAL SAMPLE INVENTORY 33 8.3 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Each sample result is evaluated to determine the accuracy and precision of the laboratory's analysis result. The sample evaluation method is discussed below.

8.3.1 SAMPLE RESULTS EVALUATION Samples provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics are evaluated using what is specified as the NRC method.

This method is based on the calculation of the ratio of results reported by the participating laboratory (QC result) to the Vendor Laboratory Known value (reference result).

An Environmental Laboratory analytical result is evaluated using the following calculation:

The value for the error resolution is calculated.

The error resolution = Reference Result Reference Results Error (1 sigma) 8-2

Using the appropriate row under the Error Resolution column in Table 8.3.1 below, a corresponding Ratio of Agreement interval is given.

The value for the ratio is then calculated.

Ratio QC Result of Agreement Reference Result If the value falls within the agreement interval, the result is acceptable.

TABLE 8.3.1 ERROR RESOLUTION RATIO OF AGREEMENT

<4 No Comparison 4to7 0.5 to 2.0 8 to 15 0.6 to 1.66 16 to 50 0.75 to 1.33 51 to 200 0.8 to 1.25

>200 0.85 to 1.18 This acceptance test is generally referred to as the "NRC" method. The acceptance criteria are contained in Procedure S-ENVSP-12, Environmental Surveillance Program Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program and EN-CY-102, Laboratory Analytical Control. The NRC method generally results in an acceptance range of approximately +/- 25% of the Known value when applied to sample results from the Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Interlaboratory Comparison Program. This method is used as the procedurally required assessment method and requires the generation of a deviation from QA/QC program report when results are unacceptable.

8-3

8.4 PROGRAM RESULTS

SUMMARY

The Interlaboratory Comparison Program numerical results are provided on Table 8-1.

8.4.1 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS QA SAMPLES RESULTS Thirty-three QA blind spike samples were analyzed as part of Eckert & Ziegler Analytics 2012 Interlaboratory Comparison Program. The following sample media were evaluated as part of the comparison program.

Air Charcoal Cartridge: 1-131

Air Particulate Filter: Mixed Gamma Emitters, Gross Beta

Water: 1-131, Mixed Gamma Emitters, Tritium, Gross Beta

" Soil: Mixed Gamma Emitters

" Milk: 1-131, Mixed Gamma Emitters

Vegetation: Mixed Gamma Emitters The JAFNPP Environmental Laboratory performed 135 individual analyses on the 33 QA samples.

Of the 135 analyses performed, 133 were in agreement using the NRC acceptance criteria for a 98.5

% agreement ratio. The two (2) analyses not in agreement are discussed below.

There were two (2) non-conformities in the 2012 program.

Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Sample E-10086, Water Gross Beta Corrective Action No. CR-JAF-2012-05041 The JAF Environmental Lab result for the Eckert & Ziegler Analytics QA sample E-10086, water gross beta, was not in agreement with the known value. JAF reported an average value of 87.4 pCi/L when the known value was 285 pCi/L.

Three aliquots of the sample were prepared and 3 results were generated along with the mean which was reported. The sampling volume was not adjusted for the 3 aliquots. The incorrect sample volume was used to calculate the activity.

The volume used in the calculation of the activity was incorrectly entered as 0.5 L when the correct volume should have been 0.166 L. If the correct volume had been used, the activity would have been 87.4

3 = 262.2 pCi/L. The corrected activity would then have been in agreement with the known value.

Guidance was added to the Lab Policy Manual for calculating gross beta concentrations when more than I aliquot of the sample is taken.

8-4

Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Sample E-10274, Water Gross Beta Corrective Action No. CR-JAF-2013-00770 The JAF Environmental Lab result for the Eckert & Ziegler Analytics QA sample E-10274, water gross beta, was not in agreement with the known value. JAF reported an average value of 190.6 pCiiL when the known value was 251 pCi/L. The error resolution is 59.7 which equates to a ratio of agreement of 0.8 to 1.25. The JAF / known value was 0.76. The sample was analyzed on another instrument with an average result of 187.9 pCiiL.

The vendor was contacted and suggested recommendations have been examined and have not accounted for the discrepancy in the result.

JAF result performed on the previous Eckert & Ziegler water gross beta sample was in excellent agreement with the known value.

8-5

8.4.2 NUMERICAL RESULTS TABLES TABLE 8-1 INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gross Beta Anal sis of Air Particulate Filter REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi +1 sigma pCi +/-1 sigma (1) 06/14/2012 El0151 FILTER 64 +/- 1.0 GROSS 66 +/- 1.0 61 +/- 1.01 1.07 A BETA 64 + 1.0 Mean = 65 +/- 0.6 12/06/2012 E10362 FILTER 71 +/- 0.9 GROSS 68 +/- 0.9 66 - 1.09 1.06 A BETA 70 +/- 0.9 Mean = 70 +/- 0.5 06/14/2012 E10189 FILTER 93 +/- 1.2 GROSS 94 +/- 1.2 84 + 1.40 1.10 A BETA 89 +/- 1.1 Mean = 92 +/- 0.7 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable 8-6

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Tritium Analysis of Water REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/liter +/-1 sigma pCi/liter +1 sigma (1) 03/15/2012 E10083 WATER 5601 +/- 169.0 H-3 5215 +/- 166.0 4990 +/- 83.40 1.08 A 5352 + 167.0 Mean = 5389 + 96.6 06/14/2012 E10150 WATER 1001 +/- 121.0 H-3 1040 +/- 121.0 964 +/- 16.10 1.07 A 1066 +/- 122.0 Mean = 1036 + 70.1 09/13/2012 E10269 WATER 918 +/- 124.0 H-3 901 +/- 124.0 960 +/- 16.00 0.95 A 915 +/- 125.0 Mean = 911 +/- 71.8 12/06/2012 E10321 WATER 12011 +/- 209.0 H-3 11938 +/- 211.0 12100 +/- 202.00 0.99 A 11994 +/- 211.0 Mean = 11981 +/- 121.4 12/06/2012 E10322 WATER 12023 +/- 210.0 H-3 12054 +/- 212.0 12100 +/- 202.00 0.99 A 12004 +/- 212.0 Mean= 12027 +/- 122.0 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable 8-7

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gross Beta Analysis of Water REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/liter +/-1 sigma pCi/liter +/-1 sigma (1) 03/15/2012 E10086 WATER 90 + 1.4 GROSS 88 + 1.4 285 +/- 4.8 0.31 N BETA 84 + 1.3 Mean = 87 + 0.8 06/14/2012 E10156 WATER 257 +/- 2.5 GROSS 255 + 2.5 273 + 4.6 0.94 A BETA 257 +/- 2.5 Mean = 256 +/- 1.4 09/13/2012 E10274 WATER 192 + 2.0 GROSS 191 +/- 2.0 251 + 4.2 0.76 N BETA 189 +/- 2.0 Mean = 191 +/- 1.2 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable 8-8

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1-131 Gamma Analysis of Air Charcoal REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi +1 sigma pCi 1 sigma (l) 03/15/2012 E10013 AIR 90 +/- 3.7 1-131 9094.1 431.57 0.96 A 90 + 3.3 Mean 90 + 2.1 06/14/2012 E10154 AIR 94 +/- 2.6 92 + 4.4 1-131 90 + 2.5 97 - 1.62 0.94 A 89 - 3.2 Mean 91 - 1.6 09/13/2012 E10267 AIR 96 - 2.6 1-131 94 2.7 97.1 - 1.62 0.98 A 96 - 2.9 Mean = 95 - 1.6 09/13/2012 E10273 AIR 102 - 2.8 1-131 101 2.7 96.8 - 1.62 1.05 A 101 - 2.6 Mean = 101 + 1.5 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable 8-9

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analysis of Water REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/liter +1 sigma pCi/liter +/-1 sigma (1) 3/15/2012 E10084 WATER 198 9.1 196 8.2 Ce-141 186 +/- 184 3.07 11.06 A 8.9 +

197 8.2 Mean= 194 4.3 189 + 49.2 257 + 39.7 Cr-51 362 +/- 68.1 309 + 5.16 0.91 A 319 +/- 42.0 Mean= 282 +/- 25.5 102 +/- 7.1 98 + 5.8 Cs-134 100 - 2.6 106 + 1.77 0.95 A 104 + 5.4 Mean= 101 - 2.7 103 + 3.9 111 + 3.1 Cs-137 116 + 1.5 113 + 1.88 0.98 A 115 + 2.9 Mean= 111 + 1.5 95 +/- 4.4 92 +/- 3.6 Co-58 97 + 2.4 93 +/- 1.56 1.03 A 100 +/- 3.4 Mean= 96 +/- 1.8 148 + 4.6 148 + 3.7 Mn-54 157 + 1.9 138 - 2.31 1.10 A 155 +/- 3.6 Mean 152 + 1.8 118 +/- 7.4 130 +/- 5.8 Fe-59 131 +/- 4.8 119 - 1.99 1.06 A 125 +/- 5.2 Mean= 126 +/- 3.0 232 + 9.5 250 +/- 7.5 Zn-65 257 +/- 3.8 235 + 3.93 1.06 A 262 +/- 6.9 Mean 250 + 3.6 209 +/- 3.9 207 3.1 Co-60 209 1.4 197 +/- 3.29 1 1.05 A 203 + 2.8 Mean = 207 +/- 1.5 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable 8-10

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analysis of Water REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/liter +1 sigma pCi/liter +1 sigma (1) 6/14/2012 E10188 WATER 110 +/-- 8.3

+/--

121 9.6 4-Ce-141 118 8.3 112 - 1.87 1.01 A 115 +/--

9.3 4-100 10.0 M-an = 111 + A1 515 - 40.9 564 - 50.5 Cr-51 532 4 41.1 548 - 9.14 1.00 A 553 - 46.3 588 - 52.7 Mean= 550 - 20.8 223 - 12.0 217 - 14.9 Cs-134 231 - 10.4 238 +E 3.97 0.95 A 225 - 12.8 234 - 14.0 Mean 226 - 5.8 281 - 7.1 277 +/- 8.6 Cs-137 298 - 6.4 289 - 4.82 0.98 A 273 - 7.3 282 - 8.4 Mean= 282 - 3.4 118 +/- 5.8 123 - 6.9 Co-58 131 +/- 5.0 126 - 2.10 1.00 A 132 - 5.8 127 +/- 6.4 Mean 126 + 2.7 182 - 6.4 177 +/- 7.5 Mn-54 200 5.7 180 - 3.01 1.03 A 184 +/- 6.6 182 +/- 7.4 Mean= 185 - 3.0 192 +/- 8.3 188 +/- 10.0 Fe-59 190 +/- 7.0 174 +/- 2.91 1.09 A 197 +/- 8.5 179 +/- 9.8 Mean 189 - 3.9 312 - 13.0 317 +/- 15.7 Zn-65 293 +/- 10.8 272 - 4.54 1.12 A 308 +/- 13.2 298 - 15.2 Mean= 306 +/- 6.1 485 - 7.2 488 - 8.6 Co-60 493 6.3 484 - 8.09 1.01 A 491 +/- 7.5 486 - 8.5 Mean= 489 +/- 3.8 116 - 10.5 82 - 12.2 1-131 101 - 10.2 99 1.66 0.93 A 85 - 11.5 78 - 12.8 Mean= 93 +/- 5.7 1 112 4.9 1-131"* 118 4.6 99 +/- 1.66 1.15 A 114 1.3 Mean = 115 +

(1) ~~ ~ielrAayis~

Rati n~ ~ Ma 23eotdEkr A=Acceptable (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc.

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable

- Result determined by Resin Extraction/Gamma Spectral Analysis.

8-11

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analysis of Water 1 tREFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/liter 1 sigma pCi/liter ++/-1sigma (1) 9/13/2012 E10270 WATER 166 +/- 6.2 167 +/- 7.1 Ce-141 170 +/- 6.5 159 : 2.65 1.04 A 159 +/- 7.7 Mean= 166 +/- 3.4 269 +/- 26.5 286 +/- 31.2 Cr-51 300 +/- 27.6 241 : 4.02 1.12 A 225 +/- 32.6 Mean= 270 +/- 14.8 107 +/- 7.6 106 +/- 9.9 Cs-134 101 +/- 8.4 105 E 1.76 0.98 A 96 +/- 10.8 Mean 102 +/- 4.6 169 +/- 4.9 158 +/- 6.7 Cs-137 175 +/- 5.6 169 +/- 2.82 0.98 A 159 + 6.5 Mean= 165 +/- 3.0 95 +/- 3.8 102 +/- 5.7 Co-58 99 +/- 4.4 98 +/- 1.63 1.00 A 95 +/- 5.7 Mean= 98 +/- 2.5 196 +/- 5.3 208 +/- 7.1 Mn-54 195 +/- 6.0 190 +/- 3.17 1.04 A 194 +/- 7.2 Mean 198 +/- 3.2 160 +/- 5.4 161 +/- 7.7 Fe-59 167 +/- 6.5 147 +/- 2.46 1.11 A 166 +/- 7.9 Mean= 164 +/- 3.5 187 +/- 8.3 191 +/- 11.2 Zn-65 191 +/- 9.6 187 +/- 3.12 0.98 A 166 +/- 11.4 Mean= 184 +/- 5.1 148 +/- 3.5 170 +/- 5.2 Co-60 154 +/- 4.2 147 +/- 2.46 1.05 A 148 +/- 5.0 Mean= 155 +/- 2.2 61.4 +/- 3.6 69.2 +/- 5.0 66.2 +/- 4.0 63 +/- 1.06 1.07 A 72.3 +/- 5.4 Mean = 67.3 +/- 2.3 68 +/- 0.9 68 +/- 0.9 1-131** 63 +/- 1.06 1.08 A 69 +/- 0.9 Mean= 68 + 0.5 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable

- Result determined by Resin Extraction/Gamma Spectral Analysis.

8-12

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analysis of Water REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/liter +/-1 sigma pCi/liter +1 sigma (1) 12/6/2012 1 E 10320 WATER 51 +/- 6.0 54 +/- 5.8 Ce-141 43 +/- 7.2 53 +/- 0.89 0.92 A 47 +/- 6.2 Mean= 49 +/- 3.2 379 +/- 33.0 382 +/- 34.5 Cr-51 321 +/- 38.3 362 +/- 6.05 0.96 A 311 +/- 35.3 Mean= 348 +/- 17.7 172 +/- 9.2 159 + 9.8 Cs-134 150 +/- 12.4 173 +/- 2.88 0.96 A 180 +/- 10.8 Mean= 165 +/- 5.3 121 +/- 4.3 118 +/- 4.5 Cs-137 120 +/- 5.7 122 + 2.03 0.99 A 122 +/- 5.1 Mean= 120 +/- 2.5 107 +/- 4.1 99 +/- 4.6 Co-58 95 +/- 5.5 103 +/- 1.72 0.98 A 103 + 4.8 Mean 101 +/- 2.4 134 +/- 4.7 134 +/- 4.9 Mn-54 120 +/- 6.0 121 +/- 2.01 1.06 A 127 +/- 5.3 Mean= 129 +/- 2.6 119 +/- 5.4 131 +/- 6.1 Fe-59 109 +/- 7.5 121 +/- 2.01 1.00 A 123 +/- 6.8 Mean= 121 +/- 3.2 205 +/- 8.9 201 +/- 9.3 Zn-65 200 + 12.2 194 +/- 3.24 1.03 A 197 +/- 10.5 Mean= 201 +/- 5.2 185 +/- 3.9 182 +/- 4.2 Co-60 183 +/- 5.3 177 +/- 2.96 1.05 A 193 +/- 4.0 Mean= 186 +/- 2.2 82.8 - 8.1 75.0 +/- 8.1 74.3 +/- 10.4 73 +/- 1.21 1.05 A 75.8 +/- 9.3 Mean = 77.0 +/- 4.5 85 +/- 1.6 86 +/- 1.8 1-131** 75 +/- 2.5 73 +/- 1.21 1.12 A 81 +/- 2.2 Mean= 81 +/- 1.0 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable

- Result determined by Resin Extraction/Gamma Spectral Analysis.

8-13

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analysis of Milk 1 1REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/liter +/-1 sigma pCi/liter +1 sigma (1) 3/15/2012 E10014 MILK 250 +/- 10.6 272 +/- 9.0 Ce- 141 255 +/- 10.1 260 +/- 4.34 0.98 A 243 +/- 10.5 Mean 255 +/- 5.0 390 +/- 43.3 495 +/- 42.2 Cr-51 364 +/- 48.9 436 +/- 7.28 1.01 A 514 +/- 49.7 Mean= 441 +/- 23.1 134 +/- 8.1 142 +/- 11.2 Cs-134 129 +/- 14.0 149 +/- 2.50 0.91 A 140 +/- 13.5 Mean= 136 +/- 6.0 157 +/- 7.7 153 +/- 6.0 Cs-137 157 +/- 7.7 159 +/- 2.66 0.95 A 140 +/- 6.9 Mean= 152 +/- 3.6 133 +/- 7.8 130 +/- 6.0 Co-58 127 +/- 7.8 132 +/- 2.20 0.97 A 122 +/- 8.0 Mean 128 +/- 3.7 204 +/- 8.8 214 +/- 7.1 Mn-54 206 +/- 8.6 195 +/- 3.26 1.06 A 203 +/- 8.5 Mean= 207 +/- 4.1 182 +/- 11.5 192 +/- 9.1 Fe-59 161 +/- 11.0 168 +/- 2.81 1.04 A 163 +/- 10.9 Mean= 175 +/- 5.3 312 +/- 18.4 326 +/- 14.4 Zn-65 320 +/- 18.0 333 +/- 5.56 0.97 A 329 +/- 17.7 Mean 322 +/- 8.6 273 +/- 7.8 279 + 6.1 Co-60 278 +/- 7.6 279 + 4.65 0.99 A 273 +/- 7.4 Mean 276 +/- 3.6 107 +/- 13.8 97.2 +/- 10.2 90.9 +/- 13.1 93 +/- 154 1.12 A 120 +/- 13.7 Mean 104 +/- 6.4 120 + 7.1 125 +/- 6.5 1-131* 105 +/- 7.6 93 +/- 1.54 1.25 A 112 +/- 7.1 Mean = 116 +/- 3.5 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable

- Result determined by Resin Extraction/Gamma Spectral Analysis.

8-14

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analysis of Milk REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/liter +/-1 sigma pCi/liter

-(1 +/-1 sigma 6/14/2012 1 E10152 MILK 81 + 5.7 83 4 6.4 Ce- 141 75 + 7.8 82 - 1.37 0.97 A 81 +/- 7.1 Mean= 80 - 3.4 429 - 31.4 411 - 30.8 Cr-51 417 - 38.5 402 +/- 6.71 1.04 A 414 - 45.0 Mean= 418 - 18.4 166 + 6.0 164 1 11.0 Cs-134 163 - 12.7 174 +/- 2.91 0.94 A 159 - 6.5 Mean= 163 + 4.7 203 +/- 6.2 203 - 6.5 Cs-137 198 + 7.1 212 - 3.54 0.95 A 202 - 6.4 Mean= 202 - 3.3 93 - 4.7 92 + 4.5 Co-58 90 +/- 5.9 92 - 1.54 0.98 A 88 - 5.6 Mean= 91 - 2.6 140 +/- 5.5 129 +/- 5.6 Mn-54 135 + 6.5 132 - 2.21 1.04 A 144 + 6.0 Mean= 137 + 3.0 130 +/- 6.4 127 - 6.6 Fe-59 142 - 8.0 128 - 2.13 1.05 A 137 - 7.7 Mean= 134 + 3.6 207 +/- 10.7 192 - 11.0 Zn-65 207 - 12.7 199 + 3.33 1.02 A 208 + 11.5 Mean 204 1 5.8 370 +/- 6.3 364 + 6.4 Co-60 356 + 7.3 355 + 5.93 1.02 A 365 +/- 6.5 Mean= 364 +/- 3.3 102 +/- 4.4 100 +/- 4.6 88.4 - 6.4 100 - 1.66 0.95 A 89.9 +/- 10.7 Mean= 95.1 + 3.5 118 +/-1 5.0 99 +/-- 5.2 1-131** 104 +- 2.2 100 - 1.66 1.08 A 109 +t 1.5 Mean= 108 +/-1 1.9 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=~Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable

- Result determined by Resin Extraction/Gamma Spectral Analysis.

8-15

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analysis of Milk REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/liter +/-1 sigma pCi/liter +/- sigma .(1) 9/13/2012 E 10272 1 MILK 159 +/-: 7.5 174 +/-

7.2 Ce-141 154 +/- 164 8.1 +/- 2.73 0.99 A 164 + 6.7 5:

Mean= 163 3.7 284 + 33.2 258 +/- 28.3 Cr-51 218 +/- 33.2 248 +/- 4.14 1.03 A 263 +/- 26.0 Mean 256 +/- 15.2 99 +/- 9.5 101 +/- 9.3 Cs-134 105 +/- 10.4 108 +/- 1.81 0.94 A 100 +/- 7.4 Mean= 101 +/- 4.6 149 +/- 6.3 161 +/- 5.8 Cs-137 159 +/- 6.4 174 +/- 2.91 0.92 A 173 +/- 5.0 Mean= 161 +/- 3.0 104 + 5.5 100 +/- 4.7 Co-58 102 +/- 5.6 100 +/- 1.68 1.06 A 116 +/- 4.2 Mean= 106 +/- 2.5 201 +/- 7.1 193 +/- 6.2 Mn-54 197 +/- 7.3 196 +/- 3.27 1.02 A 211 +/- 5.5 Mean 201 +/- 3.3 157 +/- 7.9 163 +/- 6.7 Fe-59 154 +/- 7.8 152 + 2.53 1.06 A 168 +/- 5.7 Mean= 161 +/- 3.5 186 +/- 12.4 213 +/- 10.5 Zn-65 220 +/- 11.5 192 +/- 3.21 1.06 A 198 +/- 8.8 Mean= 204 +/- 5.4 155 +/- 5.0 150 +/- 4.3 Co-60 160 +/- 5.0 152 + 2.53 1.02 A 157 +/- 3.6 Mean= 156 +/- 2.3 95.2 +/- 5.4 95.4 +/- 4.5 94.1 +/- 5.3 100 +/- 1.66 0.96 A 99.3 +/- 4.2 Mean= 96.0 +/- 2.4 106 1.1 108 1.3 1-131** 102 +/- 1.2 100 +/- 1.66 1.06 A 105 4- 0.7 Mean= 105 0.5 0.5 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable

- Result determined by Resin Extraction/Gamma Spectral Analysis.

8-16

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analysis of Air Particulate Filter REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi +/- 1 sigma pCi +1 sigma (1) 3/15/2012 E10085 FILTER 198 + 7.0 198 + 6.5 Ce-141 184 A 3.07 1.05 A 186 + 6.3 Mean= 194 + 3.8 276 +/- 39.3 Cr-51 355 +/- 41.1 308 +/- 5.14 1.00 A 292 A 36.9 Mean = 308 +/- 22.6 85 +/- 7.9 98 A: 8.5 Cs-134 106 A 1.76 0.86 A 89 A 7.9 Mean = 91 +/- 4.7 118 A 3.9 118 A: 4.3 Cs-137 112 +/- 1.88 1.03 A 110 A 4.0 Mean = 115 A 2.3 95 A 4.8 105 A: 5.8 Co-58 93 +/- 1.56 1.06 A 96 A 4.8 Mean = 99 A 3.0 163 A 4.9 155 A: 5.4 Mn-54 138 A 2.30 1.13 A 148 +/- 5.1 Mean = 155 A 3.0 132 A 7.4 130 A: 9.1 Fe-59 119 A 1.98 1.10 A 130 A 8.4 Mean = 131 A 4.8 260 A 10.1 280 A: 12.0 Zn-65 235 A 3.92 1.15 A 272 A 11.0 Mean = 271 A 6.4 201 A 4.1 210 A 4.8 Co-60 197 A 3.28 1.04 A 206 A 4.6 Mean = 206 A 2.6 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable 8-17

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analysis of Air Particulate Filter REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi +/-1 sigma pCi +/-1 sigma (1) 9/13/2012 +- 3.2 E 10271 1 FILTER 135

+/--

136 3.0 Ce- 141 134 +/-- 3.2 132 - 2.20 1.03 A 141 +/-- 3.5 Mean= 137 +/-- 1.6 223 - 14.7 195 +/- 14.2 Cr-51 212 - 16.2 200 - 3.33 1.05 A 206 - 16.2 Mean 209 - 7.7 83 - 7.5 78 +/- 7.0 Cs- 134 89 - 7.7 87 - 1.45 0.94 A 77 +/- 7.0 Mean 82 - 3.6 139 :h 4.2 139 +/- 4.1 Cs-137 140 - 4.6 140 +/- 2.34 1.01 A 145 +/- 4.2 Mean 141 +/-- 2.1 86 - 3.7 92 - 3.7 Co-58 87 +/- 4.0 81 - 1.35 1.08 A 84 - 3.5 Mean= 87 +/- 1.9 172 - 5.0 167 - 4.6 Mn-54 168 - 5.1 157 - 2.63 1.07 A 168 - 4.6 Mean= 169 - 2.4 149 - 5.6 146 +/- 5.1 Fe-59 135 - 5.6 122 +/- 2.04 1.15 A 133 - 5.0 Mean= 141 - 2.7 171 - 8.3 175 - 8.0 Zn-65 173 - 8.7 155 - 2.59 1.10 A 164 - 7.6 Mean= 171 - 4.1 4-126 3.6 124 +/-- 3.3 Co-60 126 +- 122 :h 2.04 1 1.03 A 3.7 128 +/-- 3.2 Mean= 126 +/-- 1.7 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. IY'Unacceptable

- Result determined by Resin Extraction/Gamma Spectral Analysis.

8-18

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analvsis of Soil I I REFERENCE jJAF DATE 6/14/2012 SAMPLE ID NO.

E10153 MEDIUM SOIL ANALYSIS ELAB RESULTS pCi /g+/-1 sigma s 0.161 + 0.021 LAB*

pCi/g +/-1 sigma RATIO (1) 0.169 0.021 Ce-141 0.165 0.022 0.137 +/- 0.002 1.19 A 0.156 0.019 Mean = 0.163 +/- 0.010 0.717 +/- 0.106 0.699 +/- 0.110 Cr-51 0.599 +/- 0.111 0.671 +/- 0.011 0.97 A 0.600 +/- 0.124 Mean = 0.654 +/- 0.056 0.286 +/- 0.032 0.283 +/- 0.036 Cs-134 0.269 +/- 0.029 0.292 - 0.005 0.97 A 0.292 +/- 0.035 Mean= 0.283 +/- 0.017 0.434 +/- 0.021 0.426 +/- 0.023 Cs-137 0.437 +/- 0.019 0.441 +/- 0.007 0.97 A 0.413 +/- 0.021 Mean = 0.428 +/- 0.010 0.137 +/- 0.016 0.166 +/- 0.018 Co-58 0.143 +/- 0.015 0.154 - 0.003 0.96 A 0.145 +/- 0.018 Mean= 0.148 +/- 0.008 0.206 +/- 0.017 0.201 +/- 0.020 Mn-54 0.230 +/- 0.017 0.221 + 0.004 0.94 A 0.198 +/- 0.018 Mean 0.209 +/- 0.009 0.268 +/- 0.022 0.255 +/- 0.026 Fe-59 0.209 +/- 0.023 0.213 - 0.004 1.14 A 0.237 +/- 0.026 Mean= 0.242 +/- 0.012 0.332 +/- 0.031 0.331 +/- 0.035 Zn-65 0.282 +/- 0.029 0.333 +/- 0.006 0.97 A 0.342 +/- 0.033 1 Mean 0.322 +/- 0.016 0.588 +/- 0.018 0.568 + 0.020 Co-60 0.617 +/- 0.018 0.594 +/- 0.010 1 0.98 A 0.549 +/- 0.019 Mean = 0.581 +/- 0.009 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable 8-19

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analvsis of Ve2etation I [ REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM _ANALYSIS pCi/g +/-1 sigma pCi/g +1 sigma (1) 6/14/2012 E10155 VEG 0.195

0.013 0.195 +/- 0.014 Ce-141 0.191 +/- 0.012 0.204 +/- 0.003 0.95 A 0.196 +/- 0.014 Mean = 0.194

0.007 0.926 +/- 0.076 0.902 +/- 0.082 Cr-51 1.040 +/- 0.071 0.996 +/- 0.017 0.96 A 0.943 +/- 0.087 Mean = 0.953 +/- 0.040 0.363 +/- 0.030 0.402 +/- 0.034 Cs-134 0.397 +/- 0.028 0.432 +/- 0.007 0.89 A 0.379 +/- 0.027 Mean= 0.385 +/- 0.015 0.476 +/- 0.016 0.470 +/- 0.019 Cs-137 0.472 +/- 0.016 0.525 +/- 0.009 0.91 A 0.487 +/- 0.014 Mean = 0.476 +/- 0.008 0.222 +/- 0.013 0.251 +/- 0.015 Co-58 0.236 +/- 0.012 0.229 + 0.004 1.02 A 0.221 +/- 0.012 Mean = 0.233 +/- 0.006 0.323 +/- 0.014 0.317 +/- 0.017 Mn-54 0.295 +/- 0.014 0.328 +/- 0.005 0.96 A 0.323 +/- 0.013 Mean= 0.315 +/- 0.007 0.325 +/- 0.018 0.323 +/- 0.021 Fe-59 0.330 +/- 0.018 0.317 +/- 0.005 1.01 A 0.303 +/- 0.016 Mean = 0.320 +/- 0.009 0.451 +/- 0.029 0.486 +/- 0.036 Zn-65 0.536 +/- 0.030 0.494 +/- 0.008 1.01 A 0.513 +/- 0.027 Mean = 0.497 +/- 0.015 0.832

0.017 0.861

0.020 Co-60 0.831

0.016 0.881 +/- 0.015 1 0.95 A 0.815 +/- 0.014 Mean = 0.835 +/- 0.008 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable 8-20

TABLE 8-1 (Continued)

INTERLABORATORY INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Analvsis of Vegetation REFERENCE SAMPLE JAF ELAB RESULTS LAB* RATIO DATE ID NO. MEDIUM ANALYSIS pCi/g +/-1 sigma pCi/g +/-I sigma (1) 9/13/2012 1 E10268 VEG 0.388 0.017 0.404 + 0.018 Ce-141 0.385 +/- 0.006 1.00 A 0.368 0.015 Mean= 0.387 0.010 0.625 - 0.075 Cr-5i 0.576 4- 0.083 0.584 + 0.583 +/- 0.010 1.02 A 0.067 Mean= 0.595 - 0.043 0.262 - 0.029 0.258 +/-- 0.033 Cs-134 0.255 +/- 0.004 1.00 A 0.243 +/- 0.025 Mean= 0.254 +/- 0.017 0.456 +/-- 0.019 0.486 4- 0.020 Cs-137 0.410 +/-- 0.007 1.13 A 0.447 +/- 0.015 Mean = 0.463 +/-- 0.010 0.232 +/- 0.014 0.252 +/-- 0.016 Co-58 0.236 +/- 0.004 1.01 A 0.230 +/-- 0.012 Mean = 0.238 +/- 0.008 0.497 +/- 0.020 0.491 4- 0.021 Mn-54 0.460 +/-- 0.008 1.08 A 0.496 +/- 0.016 Mean = 0.495 +/- 0.011 0.385 +/-- 0.023 0.389 A- 0.024 Fe-59 0.357 +/- 0.006 1.08 A 0.384 +/- 0.017 Mean = 0.386 +/- 0.012 0.464 +/-- 0.033 0.451 4- 0.034 Zn-65 0.452 +/- 0.008 1.02 A 0.471 +/- 0.026 Mean = 0.462 +/- 0.018 0.389 A- 0.015 0.392 A- 0.016 Co-60 A- 0.011 0.357 +/- 0.006 1.07 A 0.368 Mean= 0.383 A- 0.008 (1) Ratio = Reported/Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. A~=Acceptable

Sample provided by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. U=Unacceptable 8-21

8.5 REFERENCES

8.5.1 Radioactivity and Radiochemistry, The Counting Room: Special Edition, 1994 Caretaker Publications, Atlanta, Georgia.

8.5.2 Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, Bevington P.R., McGraw Hill, New York (1969).

8-22

ML13142A530

Text

SUMMARY

8.5 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

Search